Abundant Distribution of Little Indian Field Mouse, Mus booduga, in the Wetlands of Salt Range, Punjab, Pakistan
Abundant Distribution of Little Indian Field Mouse, Mus booduga, in the Wetlands of Salt Range, Punjab, Pakistan
Abdul Aziz Khan1,*, Waseem Ahmad Khan2, Waseem Ahmad Khan3 and Najam-ul-Huda Khan4
1Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan
2Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
3Federal Post Graduate College, H-8, Islamabad, Pakistan
4WWF Pakistan, Ferozepur Road, Lahore, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
We studied the abundance and population structure of Little Indian field mouse, Mus booduga, at five lakes in the Salt Range, Punjab, Paklistan. The trapping data of 375 trap nights indicated highest abundance of Mus booduga (no = 132), out of 141 small mammals trapped. Majority of the Mus booduga specimens were adults (56.06%) while the juvenile/sub-adults were 43.94% of the total specimens trapped. The highest trap success of Mus booduga of 74% was achieved at Namal Lake, followed by Khabeki (38.67%), Uchali (30.67%), Kallar Kahar (16%) and the lowest at Jahlar Lake (12%). The results of the present study indicated that distribution of Mus booduga was abundant in thorn-scrub habitat around five lakes in the Salt Range.
Article Information
Received 02 September 2015
Revised 21 December 2015
Accepted 13 April 2016
Available online 01 February 2017
Authors’ Contributions
AAK conceived and designed the study, and wrote the manuscript. AAK, WAK and WAK participated in the field work. NHK provided field support and logistics.
Key words
Small mammals, Thorn-scrub habitat, Wetlands of salt range.
* Corresponding author: pestwatch360@yahoo.com
0030-9923/2016/0004-1161 $ 8.00/0
Copyright 2016 Zoological Society of Pakistan
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.2.481.485
INTRODUCTION
The diversity of small mammals, particularly the rodent species of Muridae family, is remarkable in Pakistan (Akhtar, 1958-60; Ellerman, 1961; Siddiqi, 1961, 1969; Taber et al., 1967; Ahmad and Ghalib, 1979; Roberts, 1997; Woods and Kilpartick, 1997). Rodents occupy a wide range of crop lands, natural habitats, including deserts, range lands and forests. They often represent a significant amount of the animal biomass in scrub forests and other natural habitats and provide ecosystem services. The high diversity of rodent species in any ecosystem provides an opportunity to identify them and study their populations. These activities may indicate whether the ecosystem is in poor condition (degraded landscape) or in good shape (sustainable productivity). Rodent species which indicate such conditions are known as indicator species. Therefore, rodents particularly belonging to Mus spp. are to be considered as better indicators of environmental health at a local to ecozone level.
In Pakistan, the current level of information reflects the uneven knowledge of small rodent mammals in different ecological zones of the country. The majority of rodent species are considered as pests of agricultural crops, range lands and forests (Khan, 2012) and not as being considered worthy of conservation except few species of Jarbos (Saltpingotus michaelis and Allactaga elator) and crestless Himalayen porcupine, Hystrix hodgsoni. Very little knowledge is available on small rodent mammals inhabiting thorn scrub vegetation, natural forests, inter-mountainous ecozones, range and desert lands of Pakistan (Roberts, 1997; Mirza, 1969). Woods and Kilpatrick (1997) provided a comprehensive account of small mammals of northern mountains of Pakistan. Recently, Awan and Akbar (2012) documented animal and vegetation diversity of Salt Range.
Species of the genus Mus have been studied by Hussain et al. (1975), Rana and Beg (1976) and Khokhar (1983). Research based studies in croplands have provided an excellent account on small rodent mammals (Mann, 1969; Khokhar, 1981; Fulk et al., 1981; Rana and Beg, 1976; Beg and Khan, 1984; Hussain et al., 1992, 2002, 2003). Rana (1991) studied the biology and taxonomic status of little Indian field mouse, Mus booduga, in four districts of Punjab, covering both croplands and con-crop areas. M. booduga have not been recorded from alkaline tracts, farm houses and from the natural vegetation belts (Rana, 1991). Prakash (1975) recorded this species from the ruderal habitat as well as from the crop fields. In this study, data on its abundance and population structure were gathered. The results of the present study on M. booduga, conducted in the five wetlands of Salt Range will add further knowledge on small rodent mammals of Pakistan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study sites
Five lakes, Kallar Kahar, Khabeki, Uchali, Jahlar and Namal (Fig. 1) were sampled from June 03 to 12, 2011 to assess small rodent mammal’s populations, abundance and richness of species in the Salt Range. Salt Range is the last out-riders and the first uplifts of the Himalayas, commonly known as Siwaliks.
Uchali Wetland Complex is famous for having a group of three lakes (Khabeki, Uchali and Jahlar) and are 700-980 m above sea level. The complex is located in the Soan Valley, district Khushab, in the middle of the Salt Range between Indus and Jhelum rivers at 32 29 to 32 37 N latitude and 72 to 72 15 E longitude. The total water surface area of the complex is about 1,243 hectares. The three lakes have been declared as wildlife sanctuaries and designated as a Ramsar site of international importance. These lakes provide habitat to a wide variety of wintering waterfowls including species of concern such as white-headed duck (Oxyura leucocephala), ferruginous duck (Aythya nyroca), greylag goose (Anser anser) and greater flamingo (Phoenicopterus rube).
The Soan Valley, the home of these lakes is an arid, sub-tropical zone, characterized by rocky and hilly areas and covered with thorn scrub vegetation. The natural vegetation of the area mainly consists of Phulai (Acacia modesta), Kareer (Capparis aphylla) and Kahu (Olea ferruginea). Another dominating species is Gymnosporia royleana, commonly known as Pataki. In addition to the tree and shrubs of Ziziphus nummularia (Jharber) and Z. mauritiana (Ber) are common species of the Salt Range. Cymbopogan jwarancusa (Khavi grass), Cynodon dactylon (Dub), Desmostachya bipinnata (Kusa), Typha elephantine (Elephant grass) and Echinochla colona (Sanwak) are common grasses found in the area. The cultivated flora in the agriculture lands include A. nilotica (Kikar), Eucalyptus spp. (Red gum), Melia azaderach (Bakain), Dalbergia sissoo (Shisham) and Morus alba (Shahtut).
The Kallar Kahar Lake is a small brackish water body, with an area of 85 ha. The lake is located in Chakwal district at a distance of 25 km north of Chakwal city; 135 km from Rawalpindi via Chakwal road where as 100 km from Islamabad by Motorway. It is located between 32 46 to 30 31 N latitude and 72 42 to 23 80 E longitude at an altitude of 554 m above sea level. Khabeki lake is a shallow brackish lake of approximately 283 ha situated 10 km northeast of Naushera town and 38 km northwest of Khushab city between 32 37 N latitude and 72 14 E longitude. Jahlar lake is a small brackish to saline lake of 17 ha, situated 10 km southeast of Uchali lake and 10 km southwest of Naushera town, between 32 29 N latitude and 72 07 E longitude. The Uchali is brackish to saline lake and the largest lake (943 ha) and almost entirely surrounded by agricultural lands. It is situated 13 km west of Naushera town and 42 km northwest of Khushab city, between 32 33 N latitude and 72 01 E longitude. The Namal Lake (32 41 N latitude and 71 49 E longitude) is a special type of wetland in the Salt Range. It is a shallow brackish lake, partly impounded by a dam in one corner. It lies at an approximately distance of 30 km north-east of Mianwali city. Its total surface area is 486 ha and lies at an altitude of 532 m above sea level.
Traps and trapping
H.B. Sherman collapsible rat and mouse traps were used to capture live animals. In majority of the cases trap lines were selected 200-300 m away from the water line of the lakes. At each lake 2-3 trap lines were operated.
Table I.- Population structure of trapped small rodent mammals including shrews.
| Location | Species |
Adult Males |
Adult Females |
Sub-adult/ Juvenile Males |
Sub-adult/ Juvenile Females |
Male/ Female Ratio |
Total |
| Khabeki | Mus booduga |
14 |
16 |
10 |
18 |
0.41:0.59 | 58 |
| Khabeki | Suncus murinus |
1 |
2 |
-- |
-- |
0.33:0.67 | 03 |
| Uchali | M. booduga |
7 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
0.62:0.38 | 23 |
|
Uchali |
Mus musculus |
1 |
-- |
1 |
1 |
0.67:0.33 | 03 |
| Jhalar | M. booduga |
1 |
-- |
1 |
4 |
0.33:0.67 | 06 |
|
Namal |
M. booduga |
16 |
10 |
4 |
7 |
0.54:0.46 | 37 |
| Kallar kahar | M. booduga |
5 |
2 |
-- |
1 |
0.63:0.37 | 08 |
| S. murinus |
1 |
1 |
-- |
-- |
1:1 | 02 | |
| Rattus rattus |
-- |
1 |
-- |
-- |
-- | 01 | |
| Total of 05 Lakes | 04 Species |
46 |
35 |
23 |
37 |
-- |
141 |
Between the trap lines a distance of 150-200 m was kept. On each trap line 25 traps were set about 10 m apart. The traps were set one hour before sunset and trapped animals were collected next morning (0530-0600 h). Altogether, 15 trap lines were established at five lakes. Before the placement of traps, a piece of sweet melon was used as fresh bait in each trap. The collected live specimens were transferred in a transparent polythene bag for identification and recording weight nearest to 0.1 g. After recording necessary data, the captured animals were set free in the same habitat from where they were trapped. After every two trap nights, the traps were washed before using again.
Raw trap success (no. of rats/trap nights) x 100, was adjusted using equation of Caughley (1977) as follows:
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The trapping data of five lakes are presented in Table I which indicated high abundance of little Indian field mouse (M. booduga), followed by house or musk shrew (Suncus murinus), house mice (Mus musculus) and house rat (Rattus rattus). Altogether, three species of small rodent mammals and one insectivore were captured. Out of 141 small mammals trapped 49.14% were males and 51% females, while 57.45% were adults and 42.55% were juvenile/sub-adults. Juvenile population contained 38.33% males and 61.67% females. Among the adult population 56.79 % were males and 43.20% females. The trapping data also indicated that females were frequently trapped than males. The maximum (40%) males were trapped from Namal lake area, while maximum females were captured from the surroundings of Khabeki Lake. Among the trapped animals (no=141), M. booduga ranked highest in number (no=132), followed by S. murinus (no = 05), M. musculus (no = 03) and R. rattus (no = 01). Majority of the M. booduga specimens were adults (56.06%) while juvenile/sub adults were 43.94%. Females compromised 50.76% while males were 49.24% of the total specimens trapped. In the present study the proportion of juvenile/sub-adults of M. booduga was the highest so far record of the species in any eco-zone of the country and elsewhere in India. In the crop and non-crop lands of central Punjab, Rana (1991) recorded proportion of young M. booduga which varied from 8 to 12%.
Table II.- Trap success of little Indian field mouse, Mus booduga, trapped from the surroundings of five lakes of salt range.
| Location / Lake |
No. of traps |
No. of trap nights |
No. trapped |
Trap success(%) |
ATS* (%) |
| Khabeki |
50 |
150 |
58 |
38.67 |
48.94 |
| Uchali |
25 |
75 |
23 |
30.67 |
36.67 |
| Jhalar |
50 |
50 |
06 |
12.00 |
12.78 |
| Namal |
50 |
50 |
37 |
74.00 |
134.71 |
| Kallar Kahar |
50 |
50 |
08 |
16.00 |
17.43 |
*Adjusted trap success.
Trap success data of little Indian field mouse, M. booduga, at five lakes are summarized in Table II. This is a cumulative data of 15 traplines and 375 trap nights. The highest trap success of 74% was achieved at Namal Lake followed by Khabeki (38.67%), Uchali (30.67), Kallar Kahar (16.0%) and the lowest at Jahlar (12.0%). Abundance of M. booduga at Namal Lake was the highest while it was lowest at Jahlar. Based upon over 1130 trap nights, Hussain et al. (1975) record trap success of 2.37% for M. booduga in winter and 4.57 % in summer in the croplands of district Faisalabad. This study indicated that M. booduga was less plentiful in croplands than that of the results of the present study conducted in scrub lands of Salt Range. The trap success of any animal species in a specific habitat is the most important indicator of abundance of particular species. Generally, trap success of 10% or more indicate high rodent population of any species. However, relative estimates of abundance through trap success do not give absolute value for population size at any location or between time periods. In such cases, every time an animal is caught, there is one trap fewer available to make more capture. Therefore, the raw trap success was adjusted (Caughley, 1976) to reflect a simple frequency-density relationship of both sexes of M. booduga. The age classes by weight were determined as: 6-10 g (juvenile/sub-adults); 11-15 g (adult) and 16-20 g (matured/old). Only one male weighing 5 g was trapped. Age classes of M. booduga specimen are presented in Figure 2. In all age classes the mean weight of individuals did not differ significantly. The maximum weight of an individual of both sexes was 20.0 g. Only two specimens (one ♂ and one ♀) were captured having this weight class. The mean weight of old/matured males was 16.57±1.55 g, while for females it averaged 17.2±1.69 g. The mean weights of both sexes of juvenile/sub-adults and adults were 7.94±1.39 g and 12.85±1.36 g, respectively. Male-female sex ratio of M. booduga varied from 0.33:0.67 to 0.67:0.33. In the study of Rana (1991) the sex ratio varied from 1:1.38 to 1:0.45. The population structure and age classes recorded in this study indicated that M. booduga breeds throughout the year in the Salt Range. This confirmed the findings of Roberts (1997) and Rana (1991).
CONCLUSION
The diversity of small rodent mammal species was remarkable in Salt Range wetlands. Among the trapped specimens, M. booduga was the most abundant and its population was almost evenly distributed in the five lakes area except Jahlar. Previous reports from Pakistan and India show that this species is found in irrigated croplands as compared to habitats with natural vegetation. This is for the first time that M. booduga has been recorded in abundance from the thorn-scrub lands of Salt Range. This species does not depend on human habitation like M. musculus. It prefers to live in patches of tropical thorn-scrub and also on the edges of the cultivated fields. In this study, all specimens of M. booduga were trapped from such habitats. The most important feature of the present study was the recording of high density population of M. booduga in the Salt Range with 74% trap success in Namal Lake area.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr. Ghulam Akbar, National Programme Manager, Pakistan Wetlands Program (PWP) for programming this study; Mr. Najam-ul-Huda Khan (PWP) for making very logical and effective field programme; Hafiz Muhammad Bakhsh, Site Manager (KCIC), for making excellent local arrangements and gracious hospitality. Without their help and cooperation the field work was not possible.
Statement of conflicts of interest
Authors claim no conflicts of interest for this research.
REFERENCES
Ahmad, M.F. and Ghalib, S.A., 1979. A checklist of mammals of Pakistan. Rec. zool. Surv. Pakistan, 7:1-34.
Akhtar, S.E., 1958-60. The rodents of West Pakistan. J. Sci., Pt. I, 10: 5-18; Pt. ll, 19: 79-90; Pt. III, 10: 262-291; Pt. IV, 12: 17-37.
Awan, S.A. and Akbar, G. (eds.), 2012. Biodiversity of Salt Range, Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Wetlands Programme, Islamabad. pp. 215.
Bag, M.A. and Khan, A.A., 1984. The bandicoot rat invades Punjab. Pakistan J. agric. Sci., 21: 218-224.
Caughley, G., 1977. Analysis of vertebrate populations. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 234.
Ellerman, J.R., 1961. The Fauna of British India including Pakistan, Burma and Ceylon. Mammalia (2nd Ed.), Vol. 3 (Rodentia) Pt. 2, pp. 483-849. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta.
Fulk, G.W., Lathiya, S.B. and Khokhar, A.R., 1981. Rice field rats of lower Sind: Abundance, reproduction and diet. J. Zool. (London), 193: 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb03451.x
Hussain, I., Chema, A.M. and Khan, A.A., 2002. Field observation on reproduction in small rodents inhabiting agro-ecosystem of Pothwar Plateau, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., 34: 155-165.
Hussain, I., Cheema, A.M. and Khan, A.A., 2003. Small rodents in the crop ecosystem of Pothwar Plateau, Pakistan. Wildl. Res., 30: 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR01025
Hussain, I., Ahmad, M. and Brooks, J.E., 1992. Body size, sex ratio and reproduction of Bandicota bengalensis in northern Punjab. Pakistan J. Zool., 24: 193-198.
Hussain, S.R., Khan, A.A. and Beg, M.A., 1975. Ecological distribution of mice in the cultivations of Lyallpur district and vicinity. Pakistan J. agric. Sci., 12: 151-156.
Khan, A.A., 2012. Bio-economic Impacts of vertebrate pests on crops with special reference to rodent pests in Pakistan and other countries. VPCI/SARC, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Karachi. pp. 35.
Khokar, A.R., 1981. Biology of rodents in rice and wheat fields in Central Punjab, Pakistan. M.S. thesis (unpublished), University of Philippines, Los Banos, pp. 74.
Khokhar, A.R., 1983. Species of the genus Mus in Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., 15: 223-224.
Mann, G.S., 1969. Studies on the biology and control of field mice and analysis of rodent population around Ludhiana. M.Sc., thesis, Punjab Agriculture University Ludhiana, India.
Mirza, Z.B., 1969. The small mammals of West Pakistan. Central Urdu Board, Lahore (in Urdu).
Parkash, I., 1975. The population ecology of the rodents of the Rajastan Desert, India. In: Rodents in desert environments (eds. I. Parkash, and P.K. Ghosh), pp. 75-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1944-6_5; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1944-6
Rana, S.A. and Beg, M.A., 1976. Field biology of Mus musculus and M. booduga in the Punjab. Pakistan J. Zool., 8: 135-141.
Rana, S.A., 1991. Biology and taxonomic status of little Indian field mouse in Punjab. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Fisheries and Zoology. University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, pp. 204.
Roberts, T.J., 1997. The mammals of Pakistan (Revised Edition). Oxford University Press, Karachi. pp. 525.
Siddiqi, M.S.U., 1969. Tentative list of mammalian fauna of Pakistan. Pakistan Agriculture Research Council, Government of Pakistan, Karachi. pp. 160.
Siddiqi, M.S.U., 1961. Checklist of mammals of Pakistan with particular reference to the mammalian collection in the British Museum (Natural History), London. Biologia, 7: 93-225.
Taber, R.D., Sheri, A.N. and Mustafa, S.A., 1967. Mammals of Lyallpur region, West Pakistan. J. Mammal., 48: 392-407. https://doi.org/10.2307/1377772
Woods, C.A. and Kilpatrick, C.W., 1997. Biodiversity of small mammals in the mountains of Pakistan (high or low): In: Biodiversity of Pakistan (eds. S.A. Mufti, C.A. Woods and S.A. Hasan). PMNH, Islamabad (Pakistan) & FMNH, Gainesville, USA, pp. 437-467.
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?
