Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Biodiversity and Conservation of Freshwater Fishes in the Yujiang River, China

PJZ_56_6_2547-2555

Biodiversity and Conservation of Freshwater Fishes in the Yujiang River, China

Wen Xiong1, Zhimin Jin1, Zinuo Yuan1, Qin Liu2* and Peter A. Bowler3

1College of Life Sciences, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China

2Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China

3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2525, USA

ABSTRACT

The Yujiang River lies within the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot, a large conservation international-designated biodiversity hotspot in tropical Asia that supports some of the most diverse and unique ecosystems on the planet. Despite the extraordinary endemism in its 33 terrestrial ecoregions, there is little information about its freshwater fish biodiversity. Based on our field investigations and an extensive review of the literatures, we identified 137 fish species (including two non-native species), representing 9 orders, 26 families and 88 genera, that are distributed in the Yujiang River and its drainage basin. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) criteria, six of these species (Anguilla japonica, Cyprinus carpio, Luciocyprinus langsoni, Pseudohemiculter dispar, Ptychidio jordani, and Cranoglanis bouderius), qualify for recognition as Threatened Species. Overfishing, water flow diversions and modifications, and the impacts of non-native species are the greatest threats to freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yujiang River. We recommend the adoption and enforcement of additional protected areas, improvement in approaches to sustainable fishery management, much better control of non-native species, and an improvement in and the expansion of fish life-history research. Our study contributes recommendations for the better protection of freshwater fish biodiversity and the development of sustainable fisheries in the Yujiang River.


Article Information

Received 05 November 2022

Revised 20 November 2022

Accepted 07 December 2022

Available online 16 May 2023

(early access)

Published 24 September 2024

Authors’ Contribution

WX, ZJ, ZY, QL contributed in the investigation of the research work, methodology, formal analysis, software, data curation, writing the original draft of the manuscript, review, editing, and visualization. WX and QL contributed in the statistical analyses, software, formal analysis, writing review, editing type face, and data curation. WX and PAB have contributed in review and editing of the manuscript, visualization and validation. WX, QL and PAB contributed to conceptualization, methodology, resources, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, and review and editing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Key words

Aquatic conservation, Biodiversity, Freshwater fish, Inventory, Indo-Burma biodiversity, Yujiang River

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20221105001122

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

0030-9923/2024/0006-2547 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2024 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

Freshwater ecosystems support extremely high levels of aquatic biodiversity and endemism when compared to other ecosystem categories (Strayer and Dudgeon, 2010). They occupy less than 1% surface of earth, yet they support nearly 10% of the earth’s biodiversity (Dudgeon et al., 2006). Freshwater ecosystems are also the most endangered of the ecosystems in the world (Gleick, 2003). Among all aquatic organisms, freshwater fishes are considered the second most threatened animal group (Bruton, 1995). For this reason, freshwater fishes have received particular attention by conservation biologists and environmental organizations (Olden et al., 2010).

China is one of the countries with the greatest biodiversity in the world, including both in marine and freshwater ecosystems (Cao et al., 2016). Its vast territory, the varied natural and geographical conditions, and abundance of waterbodies make China one of the most biodiverse countries in its freshwater species diversity (He et al., 2020). Many researchers have focused on freshwater fishes in adjacent biodiversity hotspots, such as the Yangtze River (Fu et al., 2003) and the Mekong River (Kang et al., 2009). Information about freshwater biodiversity in other regions within the Indo-Burma, such as the Yujiang River, is scarce. Indo-Burma is an important biodiversity hotspot region including Cambodia, Laos, Burma, Thailand, Vietnam, and South China (Myers et al., 2000).

The Yujiang River is located in the Indo-Burma, which is one of biodiversity hotspots with the richest biodiversity on the planet (Myers et al., 2000). Although the investigations have reported the freshwater fish biodiversity in regions of Indo-Burma, such as Hainan Island (Xiong et al., 2018) and Leizhou Peninsula (Xiong et al., 2019), information about freshwater biodiversity in Yujiang River Basin, is scarce.

The aims of this study are (1) to compile a list of the freshwater fish fauna of Yujiang River; (2) to summarize the main threats to freshwater fish biodiversity; and (3) to advance recommendations for fish biodiversity conservation in the Yujiang River ecosystem.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The Yujiang River is the largest tributary of the Xijiang River system in the Pearl River Basin, and it is also the boundary between the Xujiang River and the Qianjiang River. It originates near the village of Guangnan, County of Liancheng in Yunnan Province. The upper reaches of the Yujiang River are referred to as the Daliang River. It flows northeast into the Guangxi Province. The Yujiang River crosses the southwestern part of the Guangxi Autonomous region of China. It flows through Guanglian, Baise, Tianyang, Tiandong, Pingguo, Longan, Nanning, Hengxian, Guigang, and ends in Guiping where it converges with the Qianjiang River. The Yujiang River has a length of 1,179 km and a total drop in elevation of 1,655 meters. The average slope is 1.4% and the average annual runoff is 47.9 billion m3. The drainage area is 90656 km2, and it passes through 7007 km2 in Guangxi, accounting for 34.5% of the total area of the Xijiang River system.

Sources of freshwater fish information

Based on both field surveys and literature reviews, we compiled information about the freshwater fish species in Yujiang River (Fig. 1). About twenty ichthyological surveys have been conducted in the Yujiang River during different seasons between 1985 and 2017. Fish samples were collected using gillnets (20×10 m, mesh size 0.5 cm), cage nets (200×10×15 cm, mesh size 0.5 cm), and electrofishing (CWB-2000P, 12V, 250HZ). For a detailed description of the sampling methods, see Xiong et al. (2017). We searched for literature that contained the following combination of words: The Yujiang River and freshwater fish or freshwater ichthyo* in the title, abstract, or keywords using the Thomson Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, http://www.isiknoledge.com) and CNKI (http://www.cnki.net). We also collected information from Chinese books, such as The freshwater fishes of Guangdong Province (Pearl River Fishes Research Institute, 1991). The scientific names were used as found in the catalog of fishes (http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp).

To identify the freshwater fishes in the Yujiang River that are at a risk of extinction, we determined if the species were assigned a designation in the red list category system (www.iucnlist.org). Fish species assessed as critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN) or vulnerable (VU) are referred as threatened in this study.

 

Results

We identified 137 fish species (including to two non-native species), within 9 orders, 26 families, and 88 genera, distributed in the Yujiang River (Table I). Cyprinidae are the most species-rich of the families represented (83 species, 60.5%). Eight species, one Balitoridae (Balitora ludongensis), one Gastromyzontidae (Vanmanenia lineata), one Cobitidae (Cobitis australis), and five Cyprinidae (Bangana decora, Bangana wui, Hemibarbus umbrifer, Ptychidio jordani, and Ptychidio macrops) are endemic to the Yujiang River. Thus, the Yujiang River, though accounting for less than 1% of total land area of China, contains 135 native freshwater species (nearly 10% of the total number of Chinese freshwater fish), with eight species being endemic to it. Because of the remarkable species richness and diversity in its fishes, the Yujiang River is one of the most important freshwater fish biodiversity conservation priorities in China.

The result showed that a total of six species (Anguilla japonica, Cyprinus carpio, Luciocyprinus langsoni, Pseudohemiculter dispar, Ptychidio jordani, and Cranoglanis bouderius) were listed as threatened species according to IUCN red list criteria (Table I).

 

Table I. Freshwater fishes in the Yujiang River.

Orders/ Family

Scientific name

IUCN

Order: Anguilliformes

Family: Anguillidae

1. Anguilla japonica Temminck and Schlegel, 1846

Endangered

Order: Beloniformes

Family: Hemiramphidae

2. Hyporhamphus intermedius (Cantor, 1842)

Not evaluated

Order: Clupeiformes

Family: Clupeidae

3. Tenualosa reevesii (Richardson, 1846)

Not evaluated

Order: Cypriniformes

Family: Balitoridae

4. Balitora kwangsiensis (Fang, 1930)

Least concern

5. Balitora ludongensis Liu and Chen, 2012a

Not evaluated

6. Sinogastromyzon wui Fang, 1930

Least concern

Family: Gastromyzontidae

7. Vanmanenia lineata (Fang, 1935)a

Not evaluated

8. Vanmanenia pingchowensis (Fang, 1935)

Least concern

Family: Catostomidae

9. Myxocyprinus asiaticus (Bleeker, 1864)

Not evaluated

Family: Botiidae

10. Leptobotia pellegrini Fang, 1936

Least concern

11. Parabotia banarescui Nalbant, 1965

Data deficient

12. Parabotia fasciatus Dabry de Thiersant, 1872

Not evaluated

13. Sinibotia pulchra Wu 1939

Data deficient

14. Sinibotia reevesae (Chang, 1944)

Not evaluated

15. Sinibotia robusta (Wu, 1939)

Data deficient

Family: Cobitidae

16. Cobitis arenae (Lin, 1934)

Data deficient

17. Cobitis australis Chen, Chen and He,2013a

Not evaluated

18. Cobitis sinensis Sauvage and Dabry de Thiersant, 1874

Least concern

19. Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cantor, 1842)

Least concern

Family: Cyprinidae

20. Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky, 1855)

Not evaluated

21. Acheilognathus barbatulus Günther, 1873

Least concern

22. Acheilognathus barbatus Nichols, 1926

Not evaluated

23. Acheilognathus tonkinensis (Vaillant, 1892)

Data deficient

24. Acrossocheilus longipinnis (Wu, 1939)

Not evaluated

25. Ancherythroculter daovantieni (Bănărescu, 1967)

Data deficient

26. Aphyocypris arcus (Lin, 1931)

Not evaluated

27. Bangana decora (Peters, 1881)a

Not evaluated

28. Bangana wui (Zheng and Chen, 1983)a

Data deficient

29. Carassioides acuminatus (Richardson, 1846)

Least concern

30. Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Least concern

31. Chanodichthys dabryi (Bleeker, 1871)

Least concern

32. Chanodichthys erythropterus (Basilewsky, 1855)

Least concern

33. Chanodichthys mongolicus mongolicus (Basilewsky, 1855)

Not evaluated

34. Chanodichthys recurviceps (Richardson, 1846)

Not evaluated

35. Cirrhinus molitorella (Valenciennes, 1844)

Near threatened

36. Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844)

Not evaluated

37. Culter alburnus Basilewsky, 1855

Not evaluated

Table continues on next page.............

Orders/ Family

Scientific name

IUCN

38. Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758

Vulnerable

39. Cyprinus multitaeniata Pellegrin and Chevey 1936

Near threatened

40. Discogobio tetrabarbatus Lin, 1931

Least concern

41. Elopichthys bambusa (Richardson, 1845)

Data deficient

42. Folifer brevifilis (Peters, 1881)

Data deficient

43. Garra orientalis Nichols, 1925

Least concern

44. Gobiobotia kolleri Bănărescu and Nalbant, 1966

Data deficient

45. Gobiobotia meridionalis Chen and Cao, 1977

Data deficient

46. Hemibarbus labeo (Pallas, 1776)

Not evaluated

47. Hemibarbus macracanthus Lu, Luo and Chen, 1977

Data deficient

48. Hemibarbus maculatus Bleeker, 1871

Not evaluated

49. Hemibarbus medius Yue, 1995

Not evaluated

50. Hemibarbus umbrifer (Lin, 1931)a

Least concern

51. Hemiculter leucisculus (Basilewsky, 1855)

Least concern

52. Hemiculterella wui (Wang, 1935)

Not evaluated

53. Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844)

Near threatened

54. Hypophthalmichthys nobilis (Richardson, 1845)

Data deficient

55. Luciobrama macrocephalus (Lacepède, 1803)

Data deficient

56. Luciocyprinus langsoni Vaillant, 1904

Vulnerable

57. Megalobrama terminalis (Richardson, 1846)

Not evaluated

58. Metzia formosae (Oshima, 1920)

Least concern

59. Metzia lineata (Pellegrin, 1907)

Least concern

60. Microphysogobio elongatus (Yao and Yang, 1977)

Not evaluated

61. Microphysogobio fukiensis (Nichols, 1926)

Least concern

62. Microphysogobio kiatingensis (Wu, 1930)

Least concern

63. Mylopharyngodon piceus (Richardson, 1846)

Data deficient

64. Ochetobius elongatus (Kner, 1867)

Least concern

65. Onychostoma barbatum (Lin, 1931)

Data deficient

66. Onychostoma gerlachi (Peters, 1881)

Near threatened

67. Onychostoma leptura (Boulenger, 1900)

Not evaluated

68. Onychostoma ovalis rhomboides Tang 1947

Not evaluated

69. Onychostoma rarum (Lin, 1933)

Data deficient

70. Onychostoma simum (Sauvage and Dabry de Thiersant, 1874)

Data deficient

71. Opsariichthys bidens Günther, 1873

Least concern

72. Osteochilus salsburyi Nichols and Pope, 1927

Least concern

73. Parabramis pekinensis (Basilewsky, 1855)

Not evaluated

74. Parator zonatus (Lin, 1935)

Not evaluated

75. Procypris mera Lin, 1933

Data deficient

76. Pseudohemiculter dispar (Peters, 1881)

Vulnerable

77. Pseudohemiculter hainanensis (Boulenger, 1900)

Least concern

78. Pseudolaubuca engraulis (Nichols, 1925)

Least concern

79. Pseudolaubuca sinensis Bleeker, 1864

Least concern

Table continues on next page.............

Orders/ Family

Scientific name

IUCN

80. Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846)

Least concern

81. Ptychidio jordani Myers, 1930a

Critically endangered

82. Ptychidio macrops Fang, 1981a

Data deficient

83. Puntius semifasciolatus (Günther, 1868)

Least concern

84. Rectoris posehensis Lin, 1935

Not evaluated

85. Rhodeus lighti (Wu, 1931)

Least concern

86. Rhodeus ocellatus ocellatus Kner, 1866

Not evaluated

87. Rhodeus sinensis Günther, 1868

Least concern

88. Rhodeus spinalis Oshima, 1926

Least concern

89. Sarcocheilichthys parvus Nichols, 1930

Least concern

90. Saurogobio dabryi dabryi Bleeker 1871

Not evaluated

91. Semilabeo notabilis Peters, 1881

Data deficient

92. Sinibrama macrops (Günther, 1868)

Least concern

93. Sinibrama melrosei (Nichols and Pope, 1927)

Data deficient

94. Spinibarbus denticulatus Oshima, 1926

Least concern

95. Spinibarbus hollandi Oshima, 1919

Data deficient

96. Squalidus argentatus (Sauvage and Dabry de Thiersant, 1874)

Data deficient

97. Squalidus wolterstorffi (Regan, 1908)

Least concern

98. Squaliobarbus curriculus (Richardson, 1846)

Data deficient

99. Toxabramis houdemeri Pellegrin, 1932

Least concern

100. Xenocypris davidi Bleeker, 1871

Not evaluated

101. Xenocypris macrolepis Bleeker, 1871

Least concern

102. Zacco platypus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846)

Not evaluated

Family: Nemacheilidae

103. Schistura fasciolata (Nichols and Pope, 1927)

Data deficient

104. Schistura incerta (Nichols, 1931)

Data deficient

105. Traccatichthys pulcher (Nichols and Pope, 1927)

Least concern

Order: Cyprinodontiformes

Family: Adrianichthyidae

106. Oryzias latipes (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846)

Not evaluated

Family: Poeciliidae

107. Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard,1853)b

Least concern

Order: Osmeriformes

Family: Salangidae

108. Neosalanx tangkahkeii (Wu, 1931)

Least concern

109. Salanx reevesii (Gray, 1831)

Data deficient

Order: Perciformes

Family: Channidae

110. Channa asiatica (Linnaeus, 1758)

Least concern

111. Channa gachua (Hamilton, 1822)

Least concern

112. Channa maculata (Lacepède, 1801)

Least concern

Family: Gobiidae

113. Mugilogobius myxodermus (Herre, 1935)

Not evaluated

114. Rhinogobius brunneus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845)

Data deficient

115. Rhinogobius giurinus Rutter, 1897

Least concern

Family: Odontobutidae

116. Micropercops compressocephalus Chen, 1985

Not evaluated

117. Odontobutis obscura (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845)

Not evaluated

118. Odontobutis sinensis Wu, Chen and Chong, 2002

Not evaluated

Family: Osphronemidae

119. Macropodus opercularis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Least concern

Table continues on next page.............

Orders/ Family

Scientific name

IUCN

Family: Sinipercidae

120. Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky, 1855)

Data deficient

121. Siniperca knerii Garman, 1912

Not evaluated

122. Siniperca scherzeri Steindachner, 1892

Data deficient

123. Siniperca undulata Fang and Chong, 1932

Near threatened

Family: Cichlidae

124. Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)b

Not evaluated

Order: Siluriformes

Family: Bagridae

125. Hemibagrus guttatus (Lacepède, 1803)

Data deficient

126. Hemibagrus macropterus Bleeker, 1870

Least concern

127. Tachysurus fulvidraco (Richardson, 1846)

Least concern

128. Tachysurus intermedius (Nichols and Pope, 1927)

Least concern

129. Tachysurus vachellii (Richardson, 1846)

Data deficient

130. Tachysurus crassilabris (Günther, 1864)

Not evaluated

131. Tachysurus argentivittatus (Regan, 1905)

Not evaluated

Family: Clariidae

132. Clarias fuscus (Lacepède 1803)

Least concern

Family: Cranoglanididae

133. Cranoglanis bouderius (Richardson, 1846)

Vulnerable

Family: Sisoridae

134. Glyptothorax fokiensis (Rendahl, 1925)

Least concern

Family: Siluridae

135. Silurus asotus Linnaeus, 1758

Least concern

Order: Synbranchiformes

Family: Mastacembelidae

136. Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepède, 1800)

Least concern

Family: Synbranchidae

137. Monopterus albus (Zuiew, 1793)

Least concern

 

a, endemic to the Yujiang River; b, non-native species.

 

These threatened fish species occur primarily in the mountain streams of Yunnan and Guangxi (Wang and Xie, 2004).

Threats to freshwater fish biodiversity

Freshwater ecosystems, including lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and wetlands, cover about 5% of the global land surface area, but support nearly 10% of the planet’s described animal species (Reid et al., 2018). Freshwater ecosystems are considered to have a higher proportion of species that are threatened with extinction than their terrestrial and marine counterparts (Vörösmarty et al., 2010). The main threats to freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yujiang River include overfishing, flow modification, and the impacts of non-native species (Xiong et al., 2018, 2019; He et al., 2020).

Overfishing is an important threat to Chinese freshwater fish biodiversity (Xing et al., 2016). Most of the areas through which the Yujiang River passes are in extremely economically poor regions of China. More than 20 million people living in the Yujiang River Basin, and fishes are the most important source of animal protein for local residents (GXBS, 2021). Many kinds of illegal fishing equipment, such as traps, gill nets, electrofishing, and poisons are widely used to harvest fish from the Yujiang River system (Xiong et al., 2018, 2019). A number of small fish taxa, such as Oryzias latipes, Rhodeus lighti, Rhodeus ocellatus, Rhodeus sinensis, Rhodeus spinalis, Mugilogobius myxodermus, Rhinogobius brunneus, Rhinogobius giurinus and tilapia species (Xiong et al., 2019, 2023), are wild-caught for the aquarium trade. Thus, overfishing is the greatest threat to native fish abundance and biodiversity.

Some water conservation projects can cause degradation of habitat and restrict the functioning of river ecosystems (Dudgeon, 2000; Dudgeon et al., 2006). Since the 1950s, many dams, irrigation projects, and hydropower projects have been constructed in the Yujiang River system (Miao et al., 2015). For example, the Guangxi Basin water conservation project, considered to be one of the top ten projects in China, was built between 2001 and 2006. The construction of these water conservation projects altered fast flowing streams to slow, pooled flow conditions, making habitat unsuitable for many endangered or endemic species such as Balitora ludongensis, Vanmanenia lineata, and Cobitis australis.

China has become known as world’s most notorious hotspot for the introduction of non-native aquatic species (Xiong et al., 2015, 2017). Fortunately, only two non-native fish species we identified were introduced in Yujiang River. These two non-native fish are the worst of the invasive species and have caused great negative ecological and economic impacts in China (Cheng et al., 2018; Gu et al., 2019). Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is the most important non-native species used for aquaculture (Xiong et al., 2015), and Guangxi and Yunnan (the main regions of the Yujiang River watershed) are China’s top two tilapia producers (Xiong et al., 2023). Inevitably, a great number of tilapia have escaped and established feral populations and even over 80% of total fisheries capture (Gu et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2023) causing the sharp decline of native aquatic biodiversity (Gu et al., 2015; 2019). The omnivorous tilapia increases the turbidity and nutrient levels of water, which has made it difficult for some native fishes to survive (Zhang et al., 2017). The western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) is the most popular non-native freshwater fish species in China (Cheng et al., 2018). We found that mosquitofish have widely spread in rivers, lakes, ponds, reservoirs, canals, and paddy fields of the Yujiang River Basin. Mosquitofish chase small or young native fish and prey on large quantities of their eggs, larvae and immature individuals (Cheng et al., 2018; Xiong et al., 2019). Nile tilapia and mosquitofish have contributed significantly to the sharp decline of native freshwater fish in the Yujiang River.

Conservation of freshwater fish biodiversity

Freshwater fish are regarded as the second most threatened animal group of all animal categories (Bruton, 1995) and they are the most important animal group in terms of providing food and protein to humans (Wang et al., 2015). Therefore, it is important to protect freshwater fish for both ecological and economic seasons.

The establishment of protected areas is one of the most effective ways to assist in the conservation of freshwater fish (Xiong et al., 2018, 2019). Although over 300 protected areas have been established for the conservation of forests, mangroves, birds, and karst ecosystems in Yunnan and Guangxi, there are no protected areas established specifically for freshwater fish. It would be a strong and likely effective measure to designate protected areas for freshwater fish and add protected lists of fish species in already established protected area in the Yujiang River, especially in the mountain streams which are important spawning grounds and habitats for a number of threatened fish, such as Balitora ludongensis, Vanmanenia lineata, Cobitis australis, and Ptychidio jordani.

Designating seasonal fishing times or terminating fishing altogether in certain areas is another important means of conserving fish biodiversity and fisheries resources (He et al., 2020). Recently, some river reaches have been designated as closed to fishing in China. For example, the mainstem of the Yangtze River has been closed to fishing between April 1 to June 30. Local governments should forbid fishing in designated spawning habitats as a protective measure for some endangered or endemic species. Illegal fishing gear, especially electrofishing and the use of poisons, should be strictly prohibited in the Yujiang River.

Finally, the prevention of additional introductions of non-native aquatic species would be an excellent manner of halting additional impacts by newly introduced non-native species (Xiong et al., 2015). The Yujiang River Basin is an important region for aquaculture, which uses non-native species to raise and sell commercially (Xiong et al., 2023). Some non-native species were and continue to be introduced solely for aquaculture. Researchers and environmental organizations should dedicate more effort to monitoring, studying life-history traits, and gaining a better understanding the ecological and economic impacts of potentially invasive aquatic species (Xiong et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2018).

Conclusion

The Yujiang River supports a high freshwater fish biodiversity, with some species recognized as endangered or endemic. Many fish species are play an important role in providing food for local residents. Overfishing, flow modification, and non-native species are the primary threats to native fish biodiversity. To better protect native freshwater fish biodiversity and maintain the development of sustainable fisheries, local governments should enforce effective measures including the establishment of additional protected areas, the provision of selective bans on fishing, better control of the use of illegal fishing gear, and the prevention of new introductions or further invasion by extant non-native species.

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly helped us to improve upon the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program (No. 2019QZKK0501).

IRB approval and ethical approval

This research was conducted in accordance with ethics committee procedures of animal experiments.

Sampling and field studies

All necessary permits for sampling and observational field studies have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities and are mentioned in the acknowledgements, if applicable.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Bruton, M.N., 1995. Have fishes had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish., 43: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001812

Cao, L., Zhang, E., Zang, C.X. and Cao, W.X., 2016. Evaluating the status of China’s continental fish and analyzing their causes of endangerment through the red list assessment. Biodivers. Sci., 24: 598-609. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2015331

Cheng, Y., Xiong, W., Tao, J., He, D.K., Chen, K. and Chen, Y.F., 2018. Life-history traits of the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis Baird and Girard, 1853) in the central Yangtze River, China. BioInvasions Rec., 7: 309-318. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2018.7.3.13

Dudgeon, D., 2000. The ecology of tropical Asian rivers and streams in relation to biodiversity conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 31: 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.239

Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A.H., Gessner, M.O., Kawabata, Z-I., Knowler, D.J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R.J., Prieur-Richard, A.H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M.L.J. and Sullivan, C.A., 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev., 81: 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006950

Fu, C., Wu, J., Chen, J., Wu, Q. and Lei, G., 2003. Freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yangtze River basin of China: patterns, threats and conservation. Biodivers. Conserv., 12: 1649-1685.

Gleick, P.H., 2003. Global freshwater resources: Soft path solutions for the 21st century. Science, 302: 1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089967

Gu, D.E., Ma, G.M., Zhu, Y.J., Xu, M., Luo, D., Li, Y.Y., Wei, H., Mu, X.D., Luo, J.R. and Hu, Y.C., 2015. The impacts of invasive Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) on the fisheries in the main rivers of Guangdong Province, China. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 59: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.01.004

Gu, D.E., Mu, X.D., Xu, M., Luo, D., Wei, H., Li, Y.Y., Zhu, Y.J., Luo, J.R. and Hu, Y.C., 2016. Identification of wild tilapia species in the main rivers of south China using mitochondrial control region sequence and morphology. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 65: 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2016.02.007

Gu, D.E., Yu, F.D., Yang, Y.X., Xu, M., Wei, H., Luo, D., Mu, X.D. and Hu, Y.C., 2019. Tilapia fisheries in Guangdong Province, China: Socio-economic benefits, and threats on native ecosystems and economics. Fish Manage. Ecol., 26: 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12330

GXBS (Guangxi Bureau of Statistics), 2021. Guangxi Statistical Yearbook. http://tjj.gxzf.gov.cn//tjsj/tjnj/material/tjnj20200415/2021/zk/indexch.htm (access on Nov 23 2021).

He, D.K., Sui, X.Y., Sun, H.Y., Tao, J., Ding, C.Z., Chen, Y.F. and Chen, Y.Y., 2020. Diversity, pattern and ecological drivers of freshwater fish in China and adjacent areas. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 30: 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09600-4

Kang, B., He, D.M., Perrett, L., Wang, H.Y., Hu, W.X., Deng, W.D. and Wu, Y.F., 2009. Fish and fisheries in the upper Mekong: Current assessment of the fish community, threats and conservation. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 19: 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-009-9114-5

Miao, C.Y., Borthwick, A.G.L., Liu, H.H. and Liu, J.G., 2015. China’s policy on dams at the crossroads: Removal or further construction? Water, 7: 2349-2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052349

Myer, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B., Pacala, S.W. and Levin, S.A., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

Olden, J.D., Kennard, M.J., Leprieur, F., Tedesco, P.A., Winemiller, K.O. and García-Berthou, E., 2010. Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: Recent progress and future challenges. Divers. Distrib., 16: 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00655.x

Pearl River Fishes Research Institute, 1991. The freshwater fishes of Guangdong province. Guangdong Science & Technology Press, Guangzhou.

Reid, A.J., Carlson, A.K., Cree, I.F., Eliason, E.J., Gell, P.A., Johnson, P.T.J., Kidd, K.A., MacCormack, T.J., Olden, J.D., Ormerod, S.J., Smol, J.P., Taylor, W.W., Tockner, K., Vermaire, J.C., Dudgeon, D. and Cooke, S.J., 2018. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev., 94: 849-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12480

Strayer, D.L. and Dudgeon, D., 2010. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: Recent progress and future challenges. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 29: 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1899/08-171.1

Vörösmarty, C.J., McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S.E., Sullivan, C.A., Liermann, C.R. and Davies, P., 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467: 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440

Wang, Q.D., Cheng, L., Liu, J.S., Li, Z.J., Xie, S.Q. and De Silva, S.S., 2015. Freshwater aquaculture in PR China: Trends and prospects. Rev. Aquacult., 7: 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12086

Wang, S. and Xie, Y., 2004. China species red list. Beijing, Higher Education. (in Chinese).

Xing, Y., Zhang, C., Fan, E. and Zhang, Y., 2016. Freshwater fishes of China: Species richness, endemism, threatened species and conservation. Divers. Distrib., 22: 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12399

Xiong, W., Sui, X.Y., Liang, S.H. and Chen, Y.F., 2015. Non-native freshwater fish species in China. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher., 25: 651-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-015-9396-8

Xiong, W., Shen, C.Y., Wu, Z.X., Lu, H.S. and Yan, Y.R., 2017a. A brief overview of known introductions of non-native marine and coastal species into China. Aquat. Invasions, 12: 109-115. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2017.12.1.11

Xiong, W., Zhu, J., Jin, L. and Zhang, J.Q., 2017b. Length weight relationships of seven fish species from the Yuan River, China. J. appl. Ichthyol., 33: 1240-1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13439

Xiong, W., Wang, Q., Xie, D. and He, D.K., 2018. Factors influencing tropical Island freshwater fishes: Species, status, threats and conservation in Hainan Island. Knowl. Manage. Aquat. Ecosyst., 419: 6. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017054

Xiong, W., Xie, D., Chen, G. and He, D.K., 2019. Freshwater fish biodiversity in the Leizhou Peninsula of China. Aquat. Ecosyst. Hlth., 22: 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2019.1632666

Xiong, W., Guo, C.B., Gozlan, R.E. and Liu, J.S., 2022. Tilapia introduction in China: Economic boom in aquaculture versus ecological threats to ecosystems. Rev. Aquacult., https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12710

Xiong, W., Guo, C.B., Rozlan, R.E. and Liu, J.S., 2023. Tilapia introduction in China: Economic boom in aquaculture versus ecological threats to ecosystems. Rev. Aquacult., 15: 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12710

Zhang, X.F., Mei, X.Y. and Gulati, R.D., 2017. Effects of omnivorous tilapia on water turbidity and primary production dynamics in shallow lakes: Implications for ecosystem management. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish., 27: 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-016-9458-6

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 5, pp. 2001-2500

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe