Biodiversity and Conservation of Freshwater Fishes in the Yujiang River, China
Biodiversity and Conservation of Freshwater Fishes in the Yujiang River, China
Wen Xiong1, Zhimin Jin1, Zinuo Yuan1, Qin Liu2* and Peter A. Bowler3
1College of Life Sciences, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China
2Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2525, USA
ABSTRACT
The Yujiang River lies within the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot, a large conservation international-designated biodiversity hotspot in tropical Asia that supports some of the most diverse and unique ecosystems on the planet. Despite the extraordinary endemism in its 33 terrestrial ecoregions, there is little information about its freshwater fish biodiversity. Based on our field investigations and an extensive review of the literatures, we identified 137 fish species (including two non-native species), representing 9 orders, 26 families and 88 genera, that are distributed in the Yujiang River and its drainage basin. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) criteria, six of these species (Anguilla japonica, Cyprinus carpio, Luciocyprinus langsoni, Pseudohemiculter dispar, Ptychidio jordani, and Cranoglanis bouderius), qualify for recognition as Threatened Species. Overfishing, water flow diversions and modifications, and the impacts of non-native species are the greatest threats to freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yujiang River. We recommend the adoption and enforcement of additional protected areas, improvement in approaches to sustainable fishery management, much better control of non-native species, and an improvement in and the expansion of fish life-history research. Our study contributes recommendations for the better protection of freshwater fish biodiversity and the development of sustainable fisheries in the Yujiang River.
Article Information
Received 05 November 2022
Revised 20 November 2022
Accepted 07 December 2022
Available online 16 May 2023
(early access)
Published 24 September 2024
Authors’ Contribution
WX, ZJ, ZY, QL contributed in the investigation of the research work, methodology, formal analysis, software, data curation, writing the original draft of the manuscript, review, editing, and visualization. WX and QL contributed in the statistical analyses, software, formal analysis, writing review, editing type face, and data curation. WX and PAB have contributed in review and editing of the manuscript, visualization and validation. WX, QL and PAB contributed to conceptualization, methodology, resources, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, and review and editing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Key words
Aquatic conservation, Biodiversity, Freshwater fish, Inventory, Indo-Burma biodiversity, Yujiang River
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20221105001122
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
0030-9923/2024/0006-2547 $ 9.00/0
Copyright 2024 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Freshwater ecosystems support extremely high levels of aquatic biodiversity and endemism when compared to other ecosystem categories (Strayer and Dudgeon, 2010). They occupy less than 1% surface of earth, yet they support nearly 10% of the earth’s biodiversity (Dudgeon et al., 2006). Freshwater ecosystems are also the most endangered of the ecosystems in the world (Gleick, 2003). Among all aquatic organisms, freshwater fishes are considered the second most threatened animal group (Bruton, 1995). For this reason, freshwater fishes have received particular attention by conservation biologists and environmental organizations (Olden et al., 2010).
China is one of the countries with the greatest biodiversity in the world, including both in marine and freshwater ecosystems (Cao et al., 2016). Its vast territory, the varied natural and geographical conditions, and abundance of waterbodies make China one of the most biodiverse countries in its freshwater species diversity (He et al., 2020). Many researchers have focused on freshwater fishes in adjacent biodiversity hotspots, such as the Yangtze River (Fu et al., 2003) and the Mekong River (Kang et al., 2009). Information about freshwater biodiversity in other regions within the Indo-Burma, such as the Yujiang River, is scarce. Indo-Burma is an important biodiversity hotspot region including Cambodia, Laos, Burma, Thailand, Vietnam, and South China (Myers et al., 2000).
The Yujiang River is located in the Indo-Burma, which is one of biodiversity hotspots with the richest biodiversity on the planet (Myers et al., 2000). Although the investigations have reported the freshwater fish biodiversity in regions of Indo-Burma, such as Hainan Island (Xiong et al., 2018) and Leizhou Peninsula (Xiong et al., 2019), information about freshwater biodiversity in Yujiang River Basin, is scarce.
The aims of this study are (1) to compile a list of the freshwater fish fauna of Yujiang River; (2) to summarize the main threats to freshwater fish biodiversity; and (3) to advance recommendations for fish biodiversity conservation in the Yujiang River ecosystem.
Materials and Methods
Study area
The Yujiang River is the largest tributary of the Xijiang River system in the Pearl River Basin, and it is also the boundary between the Xujiang River and the Qianjiang River. It originates near the village of Guangnan, County of Liancheng in Yunnan Province. The upper reaches of the Yujiang River are referred to as the Daliang River. It flows northeast into the Guangxi Province. The Yujiang River crosses the southwestern part of the Guangxi Autonomous region of China. It flows through Guanglian, Baise, Tianyang, Tiandong, Pingguo, Longan, Nanning, Hengxian, Guigang, and ends in Guiping where it converges with the Qianjiang River. The Yujiang River has a length of 1,179 km and a total drop in elevation of 1,655 meters. The average slope is 1.4% and the average annual runoff is 47.9 billion m3. The drainage area is 90656 km2, and it passes through 7007 km2 in Guangxi, accounting for 34.5% of the total area of the Xijiang River system.
Sources of freshwater fish information
Based on both field surveys and literature reviews, we compiled information about the freshwater fish species in Yujiang River (Fig. 1). About twenty ichthyological surveys have been conducted in the Yujiang River during different seasons between 1985 and 2017. Fish samples were collected using gillnets (20×10 m, mesh size 0.5 cm), cage nets (200×10×15 cm, mesh size 0.5 cm), and electrofishing (CWB-2000P, 12V, 250HZ). For a detailed description of the sampling methods, see Xiong et al. (2017). We searched for literature that contained the following combination of words: The Yujiang River and freshwater fish or freshwater ichthyo* in the title, abstract, or keywords using the Thomson Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, http://www.isiknoledge.com) and CNKI (http://www.cnki.net). We also collected information from Chinese books, such as The freshwater fishes of Guangdong Province (Pearl River Fishes Research Institute, 1991). The scientific names were used as found in the catalog of fishes (http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp).
To identify the freshwater fishes in the Yujiang River that are at a risk of extinction, we determined if the species were assigned a designation in the red list category system (www.iucnlist.org). Fish species assessed as critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN) or vulnerable (VU) are referred as threatened in this study.
Results
We identified 137 fish species (including to two non-native species), within 9 orders, 26 families, and 88 genera, distributed in the Yujiang River (Table I). Cyprinidae are the most species-rich of the families represented (83 species, 60.5%). Eight species, one Balitoridae (Balitora ludongensis), one Gastromyzontidae (Vanmanenia lineata), one Cobitidae (Cobitis australis), and five Cyprinidae (Bangana decora, Bangana wui, Hemibarbus umbrifer, Ptychidio jordani, and Ptychidio macrops) are endemic to the Yujiang River. Thus, the Yujiang River, though accounting for less than 1% of total land area of China, contains 135 native freshwater species (nearly 10% of the total number of Chinese freshwater fish), with eight species being endemic to it. Because of the remarkable species richness and diversity in its fishes, the Yujiang River is one of the most important freshwater fish biodiversity conservation priorities in China.
The result showed that a total of six species (Anguilla japonica, Cyprinus carpio, Luciocyprinus langsoni, Pseudohemiculter dispar, Ptychidio jordani, and Cranoglanis bouderius) were listed as threatened species according to IUCN red list criteria (Table I).
Table I. Freshwater fishes in the Yujiang River.
Orders/ Family |
Scientific name |
IUCN |
Order: Anguilliformes Family: Anguillidae |
1. Anguilla japonica Temminck and Schlegel, 1846 |
Endangered |
Order: Beloniformes Family: Hemiramphidae |
2. Hyporhamphus intermedius (Cantor, 1842) |
Not evaluated |
Order: Clupeiformes Family: Clupeidae |
3. Tenualosa reevesii (Richardson, 1846) |
Not evaluated |
Order: Cypriniformes Family: Balitoridae |
4. Balitora kwangsiensis (Fang, 1930) |
Least concern |
5. Balitora ludongensis Liu and Chen, 2012a |
Not evaluated |
|
6. Sinogastromyzon wui Fang, 1930 |
Least concern |
|
Family: Gastromyzontidae |
7. Vanmanenia lineata (Fang, 1935)a |
Not evaluated |
8. Vanmanenia pingchowensis (Fang, 1935) |
Least concern |
|
Family: Catostomidae |
9. Myxocyprinus asiaticus (Bleeker, 1864) |
Not evaluated |
Family: Botiidae |
10. Leptobotia pellegrini Fang, 1936 |
Least concern |
11. Parabotia banarescui Nalbant, 1965 |
Data deficient |
|
12. Parabotia fasciatus Dabry de Thiersant, 1872 |
Not evaluated |
|
13. Sinibotia pulchra Wu 1939 |
Data deficient |
|
14. Sinibotia reevesae (Chang, 1944) |
Not evaluated |
|
15. Sinibotia robusta (Wu, 1939) |
Data deficient |
|
Family: Cobitidae |
16. Cobitis arenae (Lin, 1934) |
Data deficient |
17. Cobitis australis Chen, Chen and He,2013a |
Not evaluated |
|
18. Cobitis sinensis Sauvage and Dabry de Thiersant, 1874 |
Least concern |
|
19. Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cantor, 1842) |
Least concern |
|
Family: Cyprinidae |
20. Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky, 1855) |
Not evaluated |
21. Acheilognathus barbatulus Günther, 1873 |
Least concern |
|
22. Acheilognathus barbatus Nichols, 1926 |
Not evaluated |
|
23. Acheilognathus tonkinensis (Vaillant, 1892) |
Data deficient |
|
24. Acrossocheilus longipinnis (Wu, 1939) |
Not evaluated |
|
25. Ancherythroculter daovantieni (Bănărescu, 1967) |
Data deficient |
|
26. Aphyocypris arcus (Lin, 1931) |
Not evaluated |
|
27. Bangana decora (Peters, 1881)a |
Not evaluated |
|
28. Bangana wui (Zheng and Chen, 1983)a |
Data deficient |
|
29. Carassioides acuminatus (Richardson, 1846) |
Least concern |
|
30. Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758) |
Least concern |
|
31. Chanodichthys dabryi (Bleeker, 1871) |
Least concern |
|
32. Chanodichthys erythropterus (Basilewsky, 1855) |
Least concern |
|
33. Chanodichthys mongolicus mongolicus (Basilewsky, 1855) |
Not evaluated |
|
34. Chanodichthys recurviceps (Richardson, 1846) |
Not evaluated |
|
35. Cirrhinus molitorella (Valenciennes, 1844) |
Near threatened |
|
36. Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844) |
Not evaluated |
|
37. Culter alburnus Basilewsky, 1855 |
Not evaluated |
|
Table continues on next page............. |
||
Orders/ Family |
Scientific name |
IUCN |
38. Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 |
Vulnerable |
|
39. Cyprinus multitaeniata Pellegrin and Chevey 1936 |
Near threatened |
|
40. Discogobio tetrabarbatus Lin, 1931 |
Least concern |
|
41. Elopichthys bambusa (Richardson, 1845) |
Data deficient |
|
42. Folifer brevifilis (Peters, 1881) |
Data deficient |
|
43. Garra orientalis Nichols, 1925 |
Least concern |
|
44. Gobiobotia kolleri Bănărescu and Nalbant, 1966 |
Data deficient |
|
45. Gobiobotia meridionalis Chen and Cao, 1977 |
Data deficient |
|
46. Hemibarbus labeo (Pallas, 1776) |
Not evaluated |
|
47. Hemibarbus macracanthus Lu, Luo and Chen, 1977 |
Data deficient |
|
48. Hemibarbus maculatus Bleeker, 1871 |
Not evaluated |
|
49. Hemibarbus medius Yue, 1995 |
Not evaluated |
|
50. Hemibarbus umbrifer (Lin, 1931)a |
Least concern |
|
51. Hemiculter leucisculus (Basilewsky, 1855) |
Least concern |
|
52. Hemiculterella wui (Wang, 1935) |
Not evaluated |
|
53. Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844) |
Near threatened |
|
54. Hypophthalmichthys nobilis (Richardson, 1845) |
Data deficient |
|
55. Luciobrama macrocephalus (Lacepède, 1803) |
Data deficient |
|
56. Luciocyprinus langsoni Vaillant, 1904 |
Vulnerable |
|
57. Megalobrama terminalis (Richardson, 1846) |
Not evaluated |
|
58. Metzia formosae (Oshima, 1920) |
Least concern |
|
59. Metzia lineata (Pellegrin, 1907) |
Least concern |
|
60. Microphysogobio elongatus (Yao and Yang, 1977) |
Not evaluated |
|
61. Microphysogobio fukiensis (Nichols, 1926) |
Least concern |
|
62. Microphysogobio kiatingensis (Wu, 1930) |
Least concern |
|
63. Mylopharyngodon piceus (Richardson, 1846) |
Data deficient |
|
64. Ochetobius elongatus (Kner, 1867) |
Least concern |
|
65. Onychostoma barbatum (Lin, 1931) |
Data deficient |
|
66. Onychostoma gerlachi (Peters, 1881) |
Near threatened |
|
67. Onychostoma leptura (Boulenger, 1900) |
Not evaluated |
|
68. Onychostoma ovalis rhomboides Tang 1947 |
Not evaluated |
|
69. Onychostoma rarum (Lin, 1933) |
Data deficient |
|
70. Onychostoma simum (Sauvage and Dabry de Thiersant, 1874) |
Data deficient |
|
71. Opsariichthys bidens Günther, 1873 |
Least concern |
|
72. Osteochilus salsburyi Nichols and Pope, 1927 |
Least concern |
|
73. Parabramis pekinensis (Basilewsky, 1855) |
Not evaluated |
|
74. Parator zonatus (Lin, 1935) |
Not evaluated |
|
75. Procypris mera Lin, 1933 |
Data deficient |
|
76. Pseudohemiculter dispar (Peters, 1881) |
Vulnerable |
|
77. Pseudohemiculter hainanensis (Boulenger, 1900) |
Least concern |
|
78. Pseudolaubuca engraulis (Nichols, 1925) |
Least concern |
|
79. Pseudolaubuca sinensis Bleeker, 1864 |
Least concern |
|
Table continues on next page............. |
||
Orders/ Family |
Scientific name |
IUCN |
80. Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846) |
Least concern |
|
81. Ptychidio jordani Myers, 1930a |
Critically endangered |
|
82. Ptychidio macrops Fang, 1981a |
Data deficient |
|
83. Puntius semifasciolatus (Günther, 1868) |
Least concern |
|
84. Rectoris posehensis Lin, 1935 |
Not evaluated |
|
85. Rhodeus lighti (Wu, 1931) |
Least concern |
|
86. Rhodeus ocellatus ocellatus Kner, 1866 |
Not evaluated |
|
87. Rhodeus sinensis Günther, 1868 |
Least concern |
|
88. Rhodeus spinalis Oshima, 1926 |
Least concern |
|
89. Sarcocheilichthys parvus Nichols, 1930 |
Least concern |
|
90. Saurogobio dabryi dabryi Bleeker 1871 |
Not evaluated |
|
91. Semilabeo notabilis Peters, 1881 |
Data deficient |
|
92. Sinibrama macrops (Günther, 1868) |
Least concern |
|
93. Sinibrama melrosei (Nichols and Pope, 1927) |
Data deficient |
|
94. Spinibarbus denticulatus Oshima, 1926 |
Least concern |
|
95. Spinibarbus hollandi Oshima, 1919 |
Data deficient |
|
96. Squalidus argentatus (Sauvage and Dabry de Thiersant, 1874) |
Data deficient |
|
97. Squalidus wolterstorffi (Regan, 1908) |
Least concern |
|
98. Squaliobarbus curriculus (Richardson, 1846) |
Data deficient |
|
99. Toxabramis houdemeri Pellegrin, 1932 |
Least concern |
|
100. Xenocypris davidi Bleeker, 1871 |
Not evaluated |
|
101. Xenocypris macrolepis Bleeker, 1871 |
Least concern |
|
102. Zacco platypus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846) |
Not evaluated |
|
Family: Nemacheilidae |
103. Schistura fasciolata (Nichols and Pope, 1927) |
Data deficient |
104. Schistura incerta (Nichols, 1931) |
Data deficient |
|
105. Traccatichthys pulcher (Nichols and Pope, 1927) |
Least concern |
|
Order: Cyprinodontiformes Family: Adrianichthyidae |
106. Oryzias latipes (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846) |
Not evaluated |
Family: Poeciliidae |
107. Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard,1853)b |
Least concern |
Order: Osmeriformes Family: Salangidae |
108. Neosalanx tangkahkeii (Wu, 1931) |
Least concern |
109. Salanx reevesii (Gray, 1831) |
Data deficient |
|
Order: Perciformes Family: Channidae |
110. Channa asiatica (Linnaeus, 1758) |
Least concern |
111. Channa gachua (Hamilton, 1822) |
Least concern |
|
112. Channa maculata (Lacepède, 1801) |
Least concern |
|
Family: Gobiidae |
113. Mugilogobius myxodermus (Herre, 1935) |
Not evaluated |
114. Rhinogobius brunneus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845) |
Data deficient |
|
115. Rhinogobius giurinus Rutter, 1897 |
Least concern |
|
Family: Odontobutidae |
116. Micropercops compressocephalus Chen, 1985 |
Not evaluated |
117. Odontobutis obscura (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845) |
Not evaluated |
|
118. Odontobutis sinensis Wu, Chen and Chong, 2002 |
Not evaluated |
|
Family: Osphronemidae |
119. Macropodus opercularis (Linnaeus, 1758) |
Least concern |
Table continues on next page............. |
||
Orders/ Family |
Scientific name |
IUCN |
Family: Sinipercidae |
120. Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky, 1855) |
Data deficient |
121. Siniperca knerii Garman, 1912 |
Not evaluated |
|
122. Siniperca scherzeri Steindachner, 1892 |
Data deficient |
|
123. Siniperca undulata Fang and Chong, 1932 |
Near threatened |
|
Family: Cichlidae |
124. Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)b |
Not evaluated |
Order: Siluriformes Family: Bagridae |
125. Hemibagrus guttatus (Lacepède, 1803) |
Data deficient |
126. Hemibagrus macropterus Bleeker, 1870 |
Least concern |
|
127. Tachysurus fulvidraco (Richardson, 1846) |
Least concern |
|
128. Tachysurus intermedius (Nichols and Pope, 1927) |
Least concern |
|
129. Tachysurus vachellii (Richardson, 1846) |
Data deficient |
|
130. Tachysurus crassilabris (Günther, 1864) |
Not evaluated |
|
131. Tachysurus argentivittatus (Regan, 1905) |
Not evaluated |
|
Family: Clariidae |
132. Clarias fuscus (Lacepède 1803) |
Least concern |
Family: Cranoglanididae |
133. Cranoglanis bouderius (Richardson, 1846) |
Vulnerable |
Family: Sisoridae |
134. Glyptothorax fokiensis (Rendahl, 1925) |
Least concern |
Family: Siluridae |
135. Silurus asotus Linnaeus, 1758 |
Least concern |
Order: Synbranchiformes Family: Mastacembelidae |
136. Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepède, 1800) |
Least concern |
Family: Synbranchidae |
137. Monopterus albus (Zuiew, 1793) |
Least concern |
a, endemic to the Yujiang River; b, non-native species.
These threatened fish species occur primarily in the mountain streams of Yunnan and Guangxi (Wang and Xie, 2004).
Threats to freshwater fish biodiversity
Freshwater ecosystems, including lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and wetlands, cover about 5% of the global land surface area, but support nearly 10% of the planet’s described animal species (Reid et al., 2018). Freshwater ecosystems are considered to have a higher proportion of species that are threatened with extinction than their terrestrial and marine counterparts (Vörösmarty et al., 2010). The main threats to freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yujiang River include overfishing, flow modification, and the impacts of non-native species (Xiong et al., 2018, 2019; He et al., 2020).
Overfishing is an important threat to Chinese freshwater fish biodiversity (Xing et al., 2016). Most of the areas through which the Yujiang River passes are in extremely economically poor regions of China. More than 20 million people living in the Yujiang River Basin, and fishes are the most important source of animal protein for local residents (GXBS, 2021). Many kinds of illegal fishing equipment, such as traps, gill nets, electrofishing, and poisons are widely used to harvest fish from the Yujiang River system (Xiong et al., 2018, 2019). A number of small fish taxa, such as Oryzias latipes, Rhodeus lighti, Rhodeus ocellatus, Rhodeus sinensis, Rhodeus spinalis, Mugilogobius myxodermus, Rhinogobius brunneus, Rhinogobius giurinus and tilapia species (Xiong et al., 2019, 2023), are wild-caught for the aquarium trade. Thus, overfishing is the greatest threat to native fish abundance and biodiversity.
Some water conservation projects can cause degradation of habitat and restrict the functioning of river ecosystems (Dudgeon, 2000; Dudgeon et al., 2006). Since the 1950s, many dams, irrigation projects, and hydropower projects have been constructed in the Yujiang River system (Miao et al., 2015). For example, the Guangxi Basin water conservation project, considered to be one of the top ten projects in China, was built between 2001 and 2006. The construction of these water conservation projects altered fast flowing streams to slow, pooled flow conditions, making habitat unsuitable for many endangered or endemic species such as Balitora ludongensis, Vanmanenia lineata, and Cobitis australis.
China has become known as world’s most notorious hotspot for the introduction of non-native aquatic species (Xiong et al., 2015, 2017). Fortunately, only two non-native fish species we identified were introduced in Yujiang River. These two non-native fish are the worst of the invasive species and have caused great negative ecological and economic impacts in China (Cheng et al., 2018; Gu et al., 2019). Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is the most important non-native species used for aquaculture (Xiong et al., 2015), and Guangxi and Yunnan (the main regions of the Yujiang River watershed) are China’s top two tilapia producers (Xiong et al., 2023). Inevitably, a great number of tilapia have escaped and established feral populations and even over 80% of total fisheries capture (Gu et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2023) causing the sharp decline of native aquatic biodiversity (Gu et al., 2015; 2019). The omnivorous tilapia increases the turbidity and nutrient levels of water, which has made it difficult for some native fishes to survive (Zhang et al., 2017). The western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) is the most popular non-native freshwater fish species in China (Cheng et al., 2018). We found that mosquitofish have widely spread in rivers, lakes, ponds, reservoirs, canals, and paddy fields of the Yujiang River Basin. Mosquitofish chase small or young native fish and prey on large quantities of their eggs, larvae and immature individuals (Cheng et al., 2018; Xiong et al., 2019). Nile tilapia and mosquitofish have contributed significantly to the sharp decline of native freshwater fish in the Yujiang River.
Conservation of freshwater fish biodiversity
Freshwater fish are regarded as the second most threatened animal group of all animal categories (Bruton, 1995) and they are the most important animal group in terms of providing food and protein to humans (Wang et al., 2015). Therefore, it is important to protect freshwater fish for both ecological and economic seasons.
The establishment of protected areas is one of the most effective ways to assist in the conservation of freshwater fish (Xiong et al., 2018, 2019). Although over 300 protected areas have been established for the conservation of forests, mangroves, birds, and karst ecosystems in Yunnan and Guangxi, there are no protected areas established specifically for freshwater fish. It would be a strong and likely effective measure to designate protected areas for freshwater fish and add protected lists of fish species in already established protected area in the Yujiang River, especially in the mountain streams which are important spawning grounds and habitats for a number of threatened fish, such as Balitora ludongensis, Vanmanenia lineata, Cobitis australis, and Ptychidio jordani.
Designating seasonal fishing times or terminating fishing altogether in certain areas is another important means of conserving fish biodiversity and fisheries resources (He et al., 2020). Recently, some river reaches have been designated as closed to fishing in China. For example, the mainstem of the Yangtze River has been closed to fishing between April 1 to June 30. Local governments should forbid fishing in designated spawning habitats as a protective measure for some endangered or endemic species. Illegal fishing gear, especially electrofishing and the use of poisons, should be strictly prohibited in the Yujiang River.
Finally, the prevention of additional introductions of non-native aquatic species would be an excellent manner of halting additional impacts by newly introduced non-native species (Xiong et al., 2015). The Yujiang River Basin is an important region for aquaculture, which uses non-native species to raise and sell commercially (Xiong et al., 2023). Some non-native species were and continue to be introduced solely for aquaculture. Researchers and environmental organizations should dedicate more effort to monitoring, studying life-history traits, and gaining a better understanding the ecological and economic impacts of potentially invasive aquatic species (Xiong et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2018).
Conclusion
The Yujiang River supports a high freshwater fish biodiversity, with some species recognized as endangered or endemic. Many fish species are play an important role in providing food for local residents. Overfishing, flow modification, and non-native species are the primary threats to native fish biodiversity. To better protect native freshwater fish biodiversity and maintain the development of sustainable fisheries, local governments should enforce effective measures including the establishment of additional protected areas, the provision of selective bans on fishing, better control of the use of illegal fishing gear, and the prevention of new introductions or further invasion by extant non-native species.
Acknowledgement
Special thanks to two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly helped us to improve upon the manuscript.
Funding
Funding for this project was provided by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program (No. 2019QZKK0501).
IRB approval and ethical approval
This research was conducted in accordance with ethics committee procedures of animal experiments.
Sampling and field studies
All necessary permits for sampling and observational field studies have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities and are mentioned in the acknowledgements, if applicable.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Bruton, M.N., 1995. Have fishes had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish., 43: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001812
Cao, L., Zhang, E., Zang, C.X. and Cao, W.X., 2016. Evaluating the status of China’s continental fish and analyzing their causes of endangerment through the red list assessment. Biodivers. Sci., 24: 598-609. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2015331
Cheng, Y., Xiong, W., Tao, J., He, D.K., Chen, K. and Chen, Y.F., 2018. Life-history traits of the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis Baird and Girard, 1853) in the central Yangtze River, China. BioInvasions Rec., 7: 309-318. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2018.7.3.13
Dudgeon, D., 2000. The ecology of tropical Asian rivers and streams in relation to biodiversity conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 31: 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.239
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A.H., Gessner, M.O., Kawabata, Z-I., Knowler, D.J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R.J., Prieur-Richard, A.H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M.L.J. and Sullivan, C.A., 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev., 81: 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006950
Fu, C., Wu, J., Chen, J., Wu, Q. and Lei, G., 2003. Freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yangtze River basin of China: patterns, threats and conservation. Biodivers. Conserv., 12: 1649-1685.
Gleick, P.H., 2003. Global freshwater resources: Soft path solutions for the 21st century. Science, 302: 1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089967
Gu, D.E., Ma, G.M., Zhu, Y.J., Xu, M., Luo, D., Li, Y.Y., Wei, H., Mu, X.D., Luo, J.R. and Hu, Y.C., 2015. The impacts of invasive Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) on the fisheries in the main rivers of Guangdong Province, China. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 59: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.01.004
Gu, D.E., Mu, X.D., Xu, M., Luo, D., Wei, H., Li, Y.Y., Zhu, Y.J., Luo, J.R. and Hu, Y.C., 2016. Identification of wild tilapia species in the main rivers of south China using mitochondrial control region sequence and morphology. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 65: 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2016.02.007
Gu, D.E., Yu, F.D., Yang, Y.X., Xu, M., Wei, H., Luo, D., Mu, X.D. and Hu, Y.C., 2019. Tilapia fisheries in Guangdong Province, China: Socio-economic benefits, and threats on native ecosystems and economics. Fish Manage. Ecol., 26: 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12330
GXBS (Guangxi Bureau of Statistics), 2021. Guangxi Statistical Yearbook. http://tjj.gxzf.gov.cn//tjsj/tjnj/material/tjnj20200415/2021/zk/indexch.htm (access on Nov 23 2021).
He, D.K., Sui, X.Y., Sun, H.Y., Tao, J., Ding, C.Z., Chen, Y.F. and Chen, Y.Y., 2020. Diversity, pattern and ecological drivers of freshwater fish in China and adjacent areas. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 30: 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09600-4
Kang, B., He, D.M., Perrett, L., Wang, H.Y., Hu, W.X., Deng, W.D. and Wu, Y.F., 2009. Fish and fisheries in the upper Mekong: Current assessment of the fish community, threats and conservation. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 19: 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-009-9114-5
Miao, C.Y., Borthwick, A.G.L., Liu, H.H. and Liu, J.G., 2015. China’s policy on dams at the crossroads: Removal or further construction? Water, 7: 2349-2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052349
Myer, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B., Pacala, S.W. and Levin, S.A., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Olden, J.D., Kennard, M.J., Leprieur, F., Tedesco, P.A., Winemiller, K.O. and García-Berthou, E., 2010. Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: Recent progress and future challenges. Divers. Distrib., 16: 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00655.x
Pearl River Fishes Research Institute, 1991. The freshwater fishes of Guangdong province. Guangdong Science & Technology Press, Guangzhou.
Reid, A.J., Carlson, A.K., Cree, I.F., Eliason, E.J., Gell, P.A., Johnson, P.T.J., Kidd, K.A., MacCormack, T.J., Olden, J.D., Ormerod, S.J., Smol, J.P., Taylor, W.W., Tockner, K., Vermaire, J.C., Dudgeon, D. and Cooke, S.J., 2018. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev., 94: 849-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12480
Strayer, D.L. and Dudgeon, D., 2010. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: Recent progress and future challenges. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 29: 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1899/08-171.1
Vörösmarty, C.J., McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S.E., Sullivan, C.A., Liermann, C.R. and Davies, P., 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467: 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440
Wang, Q.D., Cheng, L., Liu, J.S., Li, Z.J., Xie, S.Q. and De Silva, S.S., 2015. Freshwater aquaculture in PR China: Trends and prospects. Rev. Aquacult., 7: 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12086
Wang, S. and Xie, Y., 2004. China species red list. Beijing, Higher Education. (in Chinese).
Xing, Y., Zhang, C., Fan, E. and Zhang, Y., 2016. Freshwater fishes of China: Species richness, endemism, threatened species and conservation. Divers. Distrib., 22: 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12399
Xiong, W., Sui, X.Y., Liang, S.H. and Chen, Y.F., 2015. Non-native freshwater fish species in China. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher., 25: 651-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-015-9396-8
Xiong, W., Shen, C.Y., Wu, Z.X., Lu, H.S. and Yan, Y.R., 2017a. A brief overview of known introductions of non-native marine and coastal species into China. Aquat. Invasions, 12: 109-115. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2017.12.1.11
Xiong, W., Zhu, J., Jin, L. and Zhang, J.Q., 2017b. Length weight relationships of seven fish species from the Yuan River, China. J. appl. Ichthyol., 33: 1240-1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13439
Xiong, W., Wang, Q., Xie, D. and He, D.K., 2018. Factors influencing tropical Island freshwater fishes: Species, status, threats and conservation in Hainan Island. Knowl. Manage. Aquat. Ecosyst., 419: 6. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017054
Xiong, W., Xie, D., Chen, G. and He, D.K., 2019. Freshwater fish biodiversity in the Leizhou Peninsula of China. Aquat. Ecosyst. Hlth., 22: 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2019.1632666
Xiong, W., Guo, C.B., Gozlan, R.E. and Liu, J.S., 2022. Tilapia introduction in China: Economic boom in aquaculture versus ecological threats to ecosystems. Rev. Aquacult., https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12710
Xiong, W., Guo, C.B., Rozlan, R.E. and Liu, J.S., 2023. Tilapia introduction in China: Economic boom in aquaculture versus ecological threats to ecosystems. Rev. Aquacult., 15: 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12710
Zhang, X.F., Mei, X.Y. and Gulati, R.D., 2017. Effects of omnivorous tilapia on water turbidity and primary production dynamics in shallow lakes: Implications for ecosystem management. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish., 27: 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-016-9458-6
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?