Antimicrobial Activity of Some Medicinal Plants Extracts Against Food Industry Isolates

Hide Journal Menu

<< Previous Article

Current Issue

Next Article >>

PJZ_49_2_523-530

Antimicrobial Activity of Some Medicinal Plants Extracts Against Food Industry Isolates

Iram Liaqat1*, Najma Arshad2, Muhammad Arshad3, Safdar Ali Mirza4, Nazish Mazhar Ali1 and Ammara Shoukat1

1Department of Zoology, Govt. College University, Lahore

2Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore

3Department of Zoology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha

4Department of Botany, Govt. College University, Lahore

ABSTRACT

Microbial contamination and biofilm formation in food industries pose a threat to human health worldwide. With the increased use of antibiotics in food industry, the problem of bacterial resistance is emerging, hence leading to serious health issues. Among 24 strains isolated from Shaukat Banaspati Ghee industry (Grw) and Shezan foods (pvt) Ltd, Lahore, Pakistan food industry, 10 highly antibiotic resistant strains were subjected to morphological, physiological and biochemical characterization. 16SrRNA sequencing was performed to identify three highly resistant strains at species level. Antimicrobial activity of aqueous and methanolic plant extracts of Camellia sinensis (Green tea), Syzygium aromaticum (Clove) and Mentha piperita (Peppermint) was evaluated against identified isolates. Agar well diffusion assay was used to monitor the antimicrobial activity of these strains both in mono culture and mixed culture. Streptomycin sulphate (10 μgml-1) and Amphotericin B (5 mgml-1) were used as positive controls. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of plant extracts was also determined. Syzygium aromaticum was proven to have excellent antimicrobial activity against all tested microorganisms, while C. sinensis and M. piperita showed weak antimicrobial activity. Methanolic plant extracts exhibited greater antimicrobial activity than aqueous extracts. Maximum zone of inhibition exhibited by methanolic extracts of S. aromaticum was 10 mm and 20 mm in mono and mixed culture bacterial isolates, respectively. The findings from this study warrant further research to help to establish an alternative anti-infective phytotherapeutical approach to control antibiotic-resistant microbial strains in the food industry.

Article Information

Received 09 March 2016

Revised 26 June 2016

Accepted 19 August 2016

Available online 10 February 2017

Authors’ Contributions

IL conceived and designed the study. AS performed the experiments. NA, MA, SAM and NMA analyzed the data. IL, NA and MA wrote the article.

Key words

Food industry, Medicinal plants, Antibiotic resistant biofilms, Mentha piperita, Syzygium aromaticum, Camellia sinensis.

* Corresponding author: iramliaq@hotmail.com

0030-9923/2017/0002-523 $ 8.00/0

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.2.565.572

INTRODUCTION

The ability of microorganisms to form biofilms is of great importance in nature as well as man-made environments. These microbes may live individually or in colonies performing their functions of life. The formation of a biofilm is determined not only by the nature of the attachment surface, but also by the characteristics of the bacterial cell and by environmental factors (Van Houdt and Michiels, 2010).

Biofilms can be found in almost every environment where bacterial presence occurs (natural, industrial and clinical media). Minimum amount of moisture and nutrients are essential to flourish on a variety of surfaces (Terry et al., 2003). The presence of biofilm forming microbial population is very frequent in food industry, on a variety of surfaces including plastic, glass, metal, and wood (Chmielewsky and Frank, 2003). The attachment and biofilm formation on food products or food contact surfaces may result in food poisoning and economical losses to the producer because of food spoilage (Van Houdt and Michiels, 2010).

A major problem in the food industry is the resistance of bacterial population to antibiotics including tetracycline, beta-lactam antibiotics, and sulphamide as well as biocides (e.g., disinfectants, food and feed preservatives, or decontaminants) because of poor sanitation of surfaces or materials that come in contact with food directly or indirectly. Dairy animals are continuously exposed to different antibiotics to have good health and yield quality product. While application of disinfection strategies on crops and vegetables pose a serious threat to increasing microbial tolerance to antimicrobial agents (Chorianopoulos et al., 2008). Majority of the foodborne biofilm forming bacteria of health and quality concern belong to the genera Listeria, Staphylococcus, Alcaligenes, Enterobacter, Flavobacterium and Pseudomonas (Lee et al., 2009).

A number of the antimicrobial agents such as chlorine dioxide, sodium nitrate and ionizing radiations have been used to eliminate the bacteria in nature, household, and for bacterial infection treatment over the past five decades (Chorianopoulos et al., 2008). Due to the continued application of antimicrobial agents, microbial resistance to conventional antibiotics also increases (Capita and Alonso-Calleja, 2013). It is one of the top priority matters of food industry to have well cleaned and proper sanitizing/disinfection method to avoid biofilm contamination. However, used methods of disinfectants are not so ideal due to poor penetration ability in biofilm matrix. Search for new substances as disinfectants is the target area in food industry. The negative approach of consumers to the artificial synthetic chemicals as disinfectants have shifted our focus more towards “naturals”. It has been documented previously that essential oils and extracts of edible and medicinal plants, herbs and spices act as very potent natural antibacterial agents (Chorianopoulos et al., 2008). Advancements in sciences and technology enable the innovative development of new pharmaceuticals with better remedial activity and less side-effects by the use of natural plants. Substances and compounds extracted from plant parts (leaves, roots, stems and seeds) are now the basis of innovative research for potential applications of antimicrobial activity (Shokeen et al., 2009).

Plant products, mostly spices and extracts of a range of plant parts have been used comprehensively as natural antimicrobials and antioxidants (Oskay et al., 2009). S. aromaticum (Clove) is an evergreen aromatic plant belonging to the Myrtaceae family (Chaieb et al., 2007) that was found to have antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities against food borne pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. It is reported that eugenol is the major antimicrobial component of S. aromaticum which make its way to check the antimicrobial activity to food borne harmful bacteria (Naveed et al., 2013).

Camellia sinensis (Green tea) possesses antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic activity against various pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp.), some fungi (e.g., Candida albicans), and a variety of viruses (e.g., HIV, herpes simplex, influenza) (Wanda, 2014). C. sinensis is reported to contain 4000 bioactive compounds, out of which one third is attributed to catechin (polyphenols) (Tariq et al., 2010). Methanolic extracts of C. sinensis have already been reported to limit the growth of food borne pathogens (Kim et al., 2001).

Mentha piperita (piper mint) is a medicinally significant herbaceous plant belonging to family Labiate. M. piperita is very important as its leaves and extracts are used in foods, cosmetics and medicines (Scavroni et al., 2005). M. piperita extracts are able to cease the growth of various pathogens as well as fungi extending the shelf life of food products (Tiwari et al., 2009).

This study was aimed to assess the resistance of food borne bacterial isolates against commercial antibiotics and their biofilm forming ability. Additionally, antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of aqueous and methanolic extracts from medicinal herbs and spices (S. aromaticum, C. sinensis, M. piperita) was also evaluated against food industry isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection

Eighteen samples were collected from Shaukat Banaspati Ghee industry (Grw) and Shezan foods (pvt) Ltd, Lahore, Pakistan. Sampling was done using sterilized cotton swabs on different food contact surfaces like floor, drains, and stainless steel surfaces of food industries where the food was processed. Samples were taken to the Immunology Lab, Zoology Department GCU, Lahore under sterile conditions and processed within two hours.

Isolation and characterization of purified strains

Bacterial strains were isolated and purified by various rounds of streaking and restreaking on nutrient agar plates. Purified microbes were characterized morphologically, physiologically and biochemically following Gerhardt et al. (1994). Gram’s staining, acid fast staining and motility assays were performed. Biochemical test included catalase test, citrate utilization, H2S production, methyl red, voges proskauer, indole, denitrification, urease, TDA test, and carbohydrate fermentation. Growth curves were generated in nutrient broth for 15 h to determine the generation time and specific growth rate of the strains. Impact of pH, temperature and antibiotics was monitored in nutrient agar. Five different disks with different concentrations including Ampicillin (Am-10μml-1), Oxacillin (Ox-1μml-1), Carbenicillin (Py-100μml-1), Tetracycline (Te-30μml-1), and Amoxicillin (Ax-25μml-1) were used to check the antibiotic resistance profile on Mueller Hinton agar using dis diffusion agar method (Bauer et al., 1966).

16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing

16S RNA gene sequencing was performed to identify the taxonomic position of the isolates. The forward primer (-3′) and reverse primer (16S-27F (5′- AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 16S-1522R (5′- AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′) (Penicon) were used. Amplification reactions were performed under standard conditions (Wojtyczka et al., 2014). The PCR products were gel purified using the QIAquick Gel purification kit (QIAgen, Germany) and subjected to cycle sequencing. Obtained data were analysed with the Chromas Lite (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Tewantin, QLD, Australia) software and compared with the sequences deposited in the GenBank database. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the ClustalW software.

Quantification of biofilm formation

Biofilm formation of the identified bacterial isolates was monitored by using the congo red assay (Mathur et al., 2006), test tube method (Liaqat et al., 2009), and air-liquid interface coverslip assay (Mathur et al., 2006). Experiments were carried out in triplicates.

Preparation of aqueous and methanolic plant extracts

Syzygium aromaticum (clove), M. piperita (peppermint) and C. sinensis (green tea) were used for the preparation of plant extracts. The leaves of M. piperita were washed with distilled water and sun dried before grinding. Aqueous and methanolic extracts of plants were prepared and stored at 4°C (Somchit et al., 2003). For S. aromaticum aqueous extract, cloves were dried for 3-4 days in an incubator at 37°C and ground into fine powder using pestle and mortar. 40 g of clove powder was dissolved in 200 ml of autoclaved distilled water, boiled, centrifuged and stored at 4oC until use (Badhe et al., 2013). Methanolic extracts of plants were prepared by dissolving 60 g of plant powder in 360 ml methanol then placed in a shaker at 37°C for 24 h. The extracts were filtered, concentrated on a rotary vacuum evaporator (Agrawal, 2011) and stored at 4°C. For S. aromaticum methanolic extract, 40 g of S. aromaticum powder was mixed in 300 ml of 80 % methanol. The mixture was then filtered with Whatman filter paper no.1 and placed in an incubator at 37°C until methanol evaporated completely. The concentrated clove extract was then dissolved in 2X tris HCl (pH 8.0) and stored at 4°C until use (Pandey and Singh, 2011).

Minimum inhibitory (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) determination

MIC of the extracts was determined by broth dilution method (Pirbalouti et al., 2010). The aqueous and methanolic extracts of S. aromaticum, M. piperita and C. sinensis were diluted to concentrations ranging from 5 to 45 mg ml-1 in 3 ml nutrient broth. 150 µl of overnight bacterial suspension with a turbidity of 0.5 MacFarland standard (1.5 x 108 CFU/ml) was inoculated in the test tubes. Streptomycin sulphate (10 μgml-1) and Amphotericin B (5 mgml-1) while extract free media were used as positive and negative controls respectively were run in parallel to each concentration. After incubation for 48 hrs OD was determined at 523 nm. MIC was recorded as the lowest concentration which showed no visible growth. For MBC determination, 10 µl from the tubes with MIC and higher concentrations of extract were spread on nutrient agar plates, incubated plates at 37°C for 24 h. The concentration at which the 99% of the growth was inhibited was recorded as MBC (Okoli et al., 2002; Hassan et al., 2016).

Antibacterial activity

Plant extracts are popular for their antimicrobial activity. Antibacterial screening of plant extracts was carried out by measuring zone of inhibition by agar well diffusion method (Rios et al., 1998). Four dilutions (100%, 75%, 50% and 25%) of both aqueous and methanolic extracts were prepared. 100 µl of fresh bacterial suspension [with OD approx. 1.5 x 108 CFU/ml by comparing turbidity to 0.5 MacFarland standard (Koneman et al., 1997)] was spread on labeled nutrient agar plates with a sterilized glass spreader. Wells were made on each agar plate, labeled and filled with 200 µl plant extracts. Experiments were run in triplicates. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts was also tested against mixed cultures. Mixed cultures were prepared by adding equal volume of E. cloacae + E. coli, E. cloacae + E. ludwigii, E. coli + E. ludwigii and E. cloacae + E. coli + E. ludwigii.

Susceptibility of biofilms against plant extracts

Plant extracts were supplemented to the 3ml nutrient broth with concentration according to their MIC. 30 µl of standard bacterial inoculum was added to the test tubes. Controls inoculated only with bacterial suspension were run in parallel. After incubation, culture was discarded and tubes were dried at 37ºC for 10 min. 5 ml of 0.1% crystal violet was added and then tubes were washed with 0.85% saline solution. O.D was measured at 523 nm. Experiments were run in triplicates.

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed in SPSS (Version 13.0) using one way ANOVA followed by post hoc Turkey test. Bars having no common superscript are significantly different at p<0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Morphological and biochemical characteristics of isolated strains

Twenty four morphologically distinct strains were isolated from 18 samples collected from food industries. These isolates were characterized on the basis of color, texture, margin and elevation. Majority of the strain (79%) Gram-negative while 21% were Gram-positive. All strains showed negative result for acid fast staining. Whereas 70% of the strains showed good motility. Ten strains showing resistance against ampicillin, carbenicillin, and amoxicillin were subjected to the biochemical characterization, identified strains were found to belong to genera; Enterobacter, Shigella, Pseudomonas, Escherichia and Klebsiella (Data not shown).

16S rRNA gene sequencing and physiological characterization

Molecular characterization was done by ribotyping of 16S rRNA gene of three highly resistant strains. Theses strains were resistant against all the five antibiotics studied here (Data not shown) and were identified as E. coli (AC: KM658273), E. cloacae (AC: KM658274), and E. ludwigii (AC: KM658275). This is in agreement with Van Houdt and Michiels (2010), who isolated bacteria from a variety of industries including the food industry and reported their ability to form biofilms on a variety of biotic and abiotic surfaces. Physiological characterization of the three strains indicated that all strains have a log phase of 1.5 up to 5.15 h. Afterwards, stationary phase was observed (Fig. 1A). pH preference remains same in all three strains growing best at 7. All strains showed optimum growth at 37◦C temperature with a specific growth rate ranging from 0.59±0.02 to 0.42±0.05 h-1.

Growth ceased at 45-60°C (Fig. 1B, C). It has been reported previously that when the temperature falls beyond the optimum, the enzymatic activity would be inhibited due to destabilization of three-dimensional structure of enzymes, causing denaturation. This process decreases the reaction velocity (Bisswanger, 2014).

Quantification of biofilm formation

Biofilm formation was determined qualitatively by congo red assay in which all the strains showed black crystalline colonies indicating positive biofilm forming potential. Quantitatively, the test tube method proved to be the most reliable method (Liaqat et al., 2009) among all methods of biofilm formation. Experiments were conducted for 3, 5 and 7 days. Highest biofilm formation was achieved at 72 h of incubation. E. coli exhibited highest biofilm formation by tube method compared to E. cloacae and E. ludwigii (Fig. 2A). Air-liquid interface coverslip assay revealed again E. coli as strongest biofilm former after 72 h (Fig. 2B). Also the increased biofilm formation exhibited by different strains may be related to different properties of the attachment surface such as surface roughness, disinfectability, hydrophobicity and vulnerability to wear (Van Houdt and Michiels, 2010).

MIC and MBC determination

MIC and MBC of aqueous and methanolic plant extracts against bacterial strains isolated from food industry was determined. Results showed that MIC of aqueous plant extracts was in the range of 5-40 mg ml-1 against E. cloacae, E. coli, and E. ludwigii and of methanolic extracts was in the range of 15-45 mg ml-1. Usually MIC value was in the range below MBC. Our study revealed that in E. cloacae, S. aromaticum methanolic extract showed MIC value of 5.0 mg ml-1 (Fig. 3A) which is in accordance with the MIC values of ethanolic and aqueous extract of S. aromaticum ranging from 0.5-5.5 mg ml-1, 0.8-5.5 mg ml-1, respectively (Hoque et al., 2008). In contrast, aqueous extract of S. aromaticum proved to be more effective showing significantly low MIC (5, 15 mg ml-1) and MBC values (20, 25 mg ml-1) for E. coli and E. ludwigii, respectively (Fig. 3B, C). Plant extracts have the ability to inhibit bacterial growth due to the presence of some biologically active compounds like phenolics, alkaloids and terpenoids that interfere with the metabolic machinery of the bacterial cell (Dybey and Bhadauria, 2009).

Antibacterial activity of plant extracts in planktonic and biofilm mode

Aqueous and methanolic extracts of C. sinensis, S. aromaticum and M. piperita were tested for their antibacterial activity against three highly resistant and good biofilm forming bacteria both in planktonic and biofilm mode. Methanolic extracts were found to have more potent antimicrobial activity than aqueous extracts against all tested strains. Extracts of C. sinensis and M. piperita showed weak antibacterial activity against tested mono culture bacterial strains as compared to S. aromaticum extract (Figs. 4, 5). Methanolic extract of C. sinensis showed highest antibacterial activity against E. coli in planktonic monoculture compared to mixed culture where aqueous extract was most effective. In biofilm mode, C. sinensis methanolic extract was found to have highest antibacterial activity both in mono and mixed culture food industry isolates (Fig. 5A, B). It has been experimentally shown that extracts and essential oil from peels of Citrus fruits exhibit inhibitory activity against microorganisms. Mandal et al. (2011) assessed the in vitro antibacterial activity of C. sinensis ethanolic extract and found it useful in combating emerging drug-resistance among enteropathogens including S. typhi and V. cholerae Ogawa. In another study, Maduhri et al. (2014) evaluated the antibacterial activity of peel extracts from C. sinensis and C. aurantium and observed that C. sinensis had a greater antibacterial activity than C. aurantium.

In planktonic mode, S. aromaticum methanolic extract showed maximum zone of inhibition 8.0 ± 0.0 (ZI±S.D) against monoculture of E. coli, and this result is in accordance with a study that showed E. coli exhibited inhibition zone of 8±1 when exposed to clove extract (Saeed and Tariq, 2008). Sethi et al. (2013) reported that S. aromaticum extract was proven to be an active inhibitor of food borne bacteria. This is also what we observed in our study where S. aromaticum methanolic extracts resulted in highest zone of inhibition 20.00 ± 0.02 against mixed culture of E. coli and E. ludwigii (Fig. 4A, B). Likewise, methanolic extract of S. aromaticum exhibited significantly higher anticaterial activity both in mono and mixed culture biofilm (Fig. 5A, B). Lopez et al. (2005) also proved that S. aromaticum oil is equally effective against food borne Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria.

M. piperita showed antimicrobial activity in the form of aqueous and methanolic extract in both mono and mixed culture isolates. In comparison with methanolic extract of M. piperita, aqueous extract against E. coli showed a greater zone of inhibition (6.2±0.2). While in combination of E. cloacae, E. coli, and E. ludwigii, zone of inhibition was 4.9±0.4 (Fig. 4A, B). Antibacterial activity of M. piperita is in correlation with the study that its oil has strong antibacterial and antioxidant activities against both Gram negative and Gram positive bacterial strains (Lopez et al., 2005). Methanolic extracts of M. piperita were found to be more effective in monoculture while no significant difference was observed in antibacterial activity of aqueous or methanolic extracts in planktonic mode (Fig. 4A, B). Sandasi et al. (2011) also reported that M. piperita showed highest antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa and Candida albicans both in planktonic and biofilm mode. A similar pattern was observed in biofilm mode in our study where methanolic extracts were observed to have more potent antibacterial activity in mono or mixed culture in biofim mode than aqueous extract (Fig. 5A, B). Saharkhiz et al. (2012) examined antifungal activity of essential oil of M. piperita and observed that it inhibited the biofilm formation of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis. Considering the wide range of the antifungal activities, he concluded that it might be used as a potential antifungal agent in food industry.

CONCLUSIONS

Food hygiene is the first and foremost concern for both developing and developed countries. The presence of diseases causing biofilm forming microbes in food contact surfaces offers alarming situation for food hygiene. Bacterial population develop resistance more and more and ultimately having genetic variability due to the excessive use of commercial antibiotics for the treatment of diseases. Due to this increased resistance microbial biofilms are difficult to eradicate. There is an urgent need to identify effective alternatives to overcome this problem. Results reported in our study contributed to the knowledge of antibacterial and therapeutic properties of Pakistani medicinal plants. Both aqueous and methanolic plant extracts of C. sinensis, S. aromaticum, and M. piperita proved to have considerable antibiofilm activity and thus used as a substitute way for treatment of food-borne diseases. The results of present investigation clearly indicate that the antibacterial and antifungal activity vary with the species of the plants, plant material, and type of extract used. Hence, the present study ascertains the value of plant extract before applying in food industry, which could be of considerable interest to the development of new drugs. On the other hand more research is needed on medicinal benefits and possible harmful effects of herbal plants to confirm the safety of their effective concentrations for human consumption.

Statement of conflict of interest

Authors have declared no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

Agrawal, I., 2011. Susceptibility of bacterial biofilms against some leaf extracts. J. Pl. Sci. Feed., 1: 69-73.

Badhe, S., Fairoze, M.N., Raghunath, B.V., Sudharshan, S., Wilfred, R.S. and Chandrashekaran, V., 2013. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of aqueous extract and essential oil of clove in chicken meat system against various foodborne pathogens. J. Cell Tissue Res., 13: 3507-3511.

Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M.M., Sherris, J.C. and Turck, M., 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am. J. clin. Pathol., 45: 494-496.

Bisswanger, H., 2014. Enzyme assays. Perspect. Sci., 1: 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2014.02.005

Capita, R. and Alonso-Calleja, C., 2013. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a challenge for the food industry. Crit. Rev. Fd. Sci. Nutr., 53: 11-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.519837

Chaieb, K., Hajlaoui, H., Zmantar, T., Nakbi, K.A.B., Rouabhia, M., Mahdouani, K. and Bakhrouf, A., 2007. The chemical composition and biological activity of essential oil, Eugenia cryophyllata (Syzygium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): a short review. Phytother. Res., 21: 501-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2124

Chmielewsky, R.A.N. and Frank, J.F., 2003. Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Compreh. Rev. Fd. Sci. Fd Safe., 2: 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00012.x

Chorianopoulos, N.G.1., Giaouris, E.D., Skandamis, P.N., Haroutounian, S.A. and Nychas, G.J., 2008. Disinfectant test against monoculture and mixed-culture biofilms composed of technological, spoilage and pathogenic bacteria: bactericidal effect of essential oil and hydrosol of Satureja thymbra and comparison with standard acid-base sanitizers. J. appl. Microbiol., 104: 1586-1596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03694.x

Dybey, M. and Bhadauria, S., 2009. Green synthesis of nanosilver particles from extract of Eucalyptus hybrid (Safeda) leaf. Dig. J. Nanometer Biosci., 4: 537-543.