Short Communication · Volume 53, Issue 4, 7 June 2021 · Open Access
Red Onion Extract Attenuates Aluminum Induced Toxicity in Swiss Albino Mice
· · · · ·
Affiliations & Notes ⌄
- 1Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore, Pakistan 2Department of Zoology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan 3Department of Pathobiology, Narowal Sub-Campus University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan 4Department of Zoology, University of Lahore, Sub Campus Sargodha, Pakistan. , * Corresponding author: dr.chamanara@yahoo.com
Article Info ⌄
- Journal:
- Pakistan Journal of Zoology
- Published:
- 7 June 2021

From the article
- During current study, a significant (P≤0.001) decrease in mice body weight was observed in Al exposed groups as compared to control group.
- In the case of AD+Al group average weights of all tissues were comparable to control group except at higher concentrations of Al whereas, average liver weight increased noticeably (P≤0.05) in the mice exposed to onion extract only (Table I).
- Groups in which onion extract was co-administered with Al, increase was less obvious except at higher concentrations of Al (AD+ D-III).
- Contrary to these findings, another noticeable thing was hepatotoxicity and serum level of liver specific enzymes was also increased significantly in only onion extract exposed mice, probably due to its sulphur content.
Selected from the article's own text.
Abstract
Materials and methods
Swiss Webster albino male mice (Mus musculus), 8-9 weeks old and approximately 28 ±2g weight, were raised in the animal house, Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore. Mice were housed in ventilated steel cages (14x”10”x7”) under well controlled environment, 12h light/dark cycle, temperature (27 ± 2°C) and with relative humidity 40-55%. Food and water were supplied ad libitum. All protocols and ethical procedures opted during this research were approved by local Ethical Committee of the Punjab University.
Aluminum chloride as source of aluminum (Al) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co (Online). Keeping in view, LD50 of Al chloride in mice (0.77 ±0.12g/kg), three sub-lethal concentrations of Al were prepared in water, so that 0.1ml contained the required dose concentrations of 37.5µg/g, 18.7µg/g, 9.37µg/g body weight for mice. Onion extract was prepared by grinding 100g of onion in 60ml distilled water according to the reported procedure (Yoshinari et al., 2012). In short, fresh red onions purchased from local market of Lahore were peeled, cleaned and cut into pieces. Onion pieces were then minced using an electric blender and paste filtered using fine cloth to get liquid extract which was stored at 4°C.
In all eighty male albino mice were randomly divided into eight groups each of ten mice, which received following treatments for 30 days consecutively through oral gavage: (i) Control: received distilled water; (ii) D-I: received 9.37µg/g B.W of Al; (iii) D-II: received 18.7µg/g B.W of Al; (iv) D-III: received 37.5µg/g B.W of Al; (v) AD+D-I: received onion extract+9.37µg/g B.W of Al; (vi) AD+D-II: received onion extract+18.7µg/g B.W of Al; (vii) AD+D-III: received onion extract+37.5µg/g B.W of Al; (viii) AD: which received onion extract (1ml) only. The animals were euthanized by anesthetic inhalation Isoflurane for dissection on 31st day of dose administration.
Morphological and morphometric studies involved wet weight of testes, liver and kidneys measured by digital balance. Blood samples for biochemical assay were collected from intra-cardiac puncture into serum separating tubes and different enzymes were analyzed by methods described by Mastoi et al. (2010).
The arithmetic mean and standard error of means of all observations were calculated. The numerical data were processed statistically by using software SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) by one-way ANOVA. Post Hoc Tukey test was applied on significant results for multiple comparisons.
Results and discussion
During current study, a significant (P≤0.001) decrease in mice body weight was observed in Al exposed groups as compared to control group. But average weight of mice in AD+Al groups was comparable with control and antidote groups (Table I). Our results were similar to those of Zhu et al. (2014) and Julka et al. (1996), who described that the oral administration of Al chloride had a detrimental effect on the body weights of rats.
Morphometric data revealed dose dependent increase (P≤0.05 to P≤0.001) in the mean weight of testes, kidneys and liver in Al exposed groups as compared to control. In the case of AD+Al group average weights of all tissues were comparable to control group except at higher concentrations of Al whereas, average liver weight increased noticeably (P≤0.05) in the mice exposed to onion extract only (Table I). These results are justified by the observations of Ighodaro et al. (2012) who reported marked degenerative changes and increased weight of testes and liver in Al exposed male rats. This was probably due to the functional compensation of the organs against oxidative stress caused by Al chloride.
Table I shows elevated levels (p≤0.05-p≤0.001) of liver function biomarkers ALT, ALP and AST in Al administered groups in dose dependent manner. These findings are supported by Chinoy and Memon (2001) who described that Al exposure promoted liver dysfunction. Groups in which onion extract was co-administered with Al, increase was less obvious except at higher concentrations of Al (AD+ D-III). Bilirubin level remained consistently less in Al group though a remarkable decrease was seen in AD+ Al group.
Table I also shows biochemical markers for kidney (urea and creatinine levels) which increased (p≤0.05-p≤0.001) notably in Al exposed groups though onion extract therapy increased urea and creatinine level inconsistently compared with control. These outcomes are similar to the study of Newairy et al. (2009). However, onion extract prior to Al significantly altered urea and creatinine level to someextent in normal range. These results are similar tothose of Prakash et al. (2007).
Table I. Effect of onion extract on body weight, weights of organs (liver, kidney and testis), liver function and renal function parameters of aluminum intoxicated male swiss albino mice.
| Dose groups parameters | Control (n=10) | Al treated groups | Onion extract+ Al treatment | Onion extract treatment AD (n=10) | ||||
| D-I (n=10) | D-II (n=10) | D-III (n=10) | AD + D-I (n=10) | AD + D-II (n=10) | AD + DIII (n=10) | |||
| Body weight (g) | 30.0 ±0.92 | 27.2 ±0.50 | 26.4 ±0.28*** | 25.5 ±0.87*** | 28.95 ±1.3 | 29 ±0.35 | 29.3 ±1.35 | 28.5 ±1.18 |
| Organ weight(mg) | ||||||||
| Liver | 1208.8 ±33.77 | 1209 ±22.70 | 1482.6 ±23.77** | 1802 ±29.50*** | 1351 ±15.85 | 1466.6 ±26.36* | 1608 ±22.70*** | 1283.6 ±32.56* |
| Kidney | 231.6 ±9.09 | 249 ±7.80* | 259.4 ±4.01* | 268 ±9.26** | 223 ±5.61 | 251.6 ±5.80* | 256.4 ±11* | 215 ±18.56 |
| Testis | 53 ±2.03 | 61.6 ±5.19* | 70.4 ±4.50** | 72.7 ±3.55*** | 52.3 ±2.28 | 53.6 ±1.40 | 62.4 ±3.55** | 50.5 ±2.28 |
| Liver function test | ||||||||
| Bilirubin (mg/dl) | 0.76 ±0.07 | 0.61 ±0.09 | 0.69 ±0.09 | 0.68 ±0.09 | 0.49 ±0.00 | 0.49 ±0.00*** | 0.51 ±0.21*** | 0.39 ±0.00** |
| ALT (U/L) | 19.3 ±0.08 | 23.04 ±0.25* | 21.2 ±0.43* | 27 ±0.27*** | 18.94 ±0.16 | 23.66 ±0.52* | 24.84 ±0.37* | 39.38 ±0.41 |
| AST (U/L) | 18.1 ±0.58 | 26.6 ±0.21** | 25.8 ±0.37** | 29.8 ±0.09*** | 20.8 ±0.24* | 14.6 ±0.18 | 22.8 ±0.10* | 41.46 ±0.34** |
| ALP (U/L) | 150.3 ±0.56 | 201.5 ±0.22*** | 188 ±0.41*** | 215.6 ±0.31*** | 205.5 ±0.44*** | 199.3 ±0.31*** | 213.6 ±0.43*** | 175.7 ±0.39* |
| Renal function test | ||||||||
| Urea (mg/dl) | 31.8 ±3.73 | 28.46 ±0.24 | 37.76 ±0.10* | 42.84 ±0.09** | 30.9 ±0.11* | 27.76 ±0.11 | 29.80 ±0.09* | 28.1 ±3.25 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.48 ±0.09 | 0.8 ±0.05*** | 0.78 ±0.01*** | 1.18 ±0.00*** | 0.81 ±0.01*** | 0.68 ±0.00* | 0.63 ±0.03* | 0.58 ±0.00 |
Control, untreated; D-I, D-II, D-III, Al exposed groups; AD+D-I, AD+D-II, AD+D-III, Al + onion extract treated; AD, onion extract treated; n, number of animals. Data presented as Mean ± SEM, Oneway ANOVA, * P≤0.05, **P≤0.01, ***P≤0.001. ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase.
Despite these findings and clear evidences on hepatic, renal, and testicular toxicity of Al in mammalian model, this study had some limitations. First, very low concentration of Al is expected to be absorbed using oral administration and unfortunately we were not able to detect the levels of Al accumulation within the tested tissues by HPLC.
Conclusion
So by these observations, it is concluded that Al toxicity is proved by various parameters (Morphology, morphometry, biochemistry). Side by side, therapeutic effect of onion extract is justified, when given with Al, it showed positive remedial potential. Perhaps here onion extract acts as metal chelating agent and binds with Al. Contrary to these findings, another noticeable thing was hepatotoxicity and serum level of liver specific enzymes was also increased significantly in only onion extract exposed mice, probably due to its sulphur content.
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
- Abbasali, K.M., Zhila, T. and Farshad, N., 2005. J. appl. Res., 5: 575-579.
- Augusti, K.T., 2009. J. exp. Biol., 34:634-640. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819dfa46[CrossRef]
- Braunlich, H., Fleck, C., Kerste, L., Stein, G., Laske, V., Muller, A. and Keil, E., 2006. J. appl. Toxicol., 6: 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2550060112[CrossRef]
- Chinoy, N.J. and Memon, M.R., 2001. Fluoride, 34: 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPER.2001.4311119[CrossRef]
- Exely, C., Burgess, E., Day, J.P., Jefrey, E.H., Melethil, S. and Yokel, R.A., 1997. In: Research issues in aluminium toxicity. Taylor and Francis, Washington., pp. 117-132.
- Ighodaro, O.M., Omele, J.O., Ebuehi, O.A.T. and Salawu, F.N., 2012. J. Hosp. Med., 22: 123-134.
- Julka, D., and Gill, K.D., 1996. Biochim. biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis., 1315: 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4439(95)00100-X[CrossRef]
- Kumar, V. and Gill, K.D., 2009. Arch. Toxicol., 83: 965– 978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-009-0455-6[CrossRef]
- Mastoi, A.A., Devrajani, B.R., Shah, S.Z.A., Rohopoto, Q., Memon, S.A., Baloch, M. and Sami, W., 2010. World J. Gestroenterol., 16: 603-607. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i5.603[CrossRef]
- Mitkus, R.J., King, D.B., Hess, M.A., Forshee, R.A. and Walderhaug, M.O., 2011. Vaccine, 29: 9538-9543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.124[CrossRef]
- Nehru, B. and Bhalla, P., 2006. Mol. Cell Biochem., 290: 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-006-9186-7[CrossRef]
- Newairy, A.S.A., Salama, A.F., Hussien, H.M., and Yousef, M.I., 2009. Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 47: 1093-1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.01.032[CrossRef]
- Ochmanski, W. and Barabasz, W., 2000. Przegl. Lek., 57: 665–668.
- Prakash, D., Singh, B.N. and Upadhyay, G., 2007. Fd. Chem., 102: 1389–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.06.063[CrossRef]
- Qitu, M.A., Rengel, Z. and Kuo, J., 2002. Annls Bot., 89: 241.
- Roldán, E., Sanchez-Moreno, C., De ancos, B. and Cano, MP., 2008. Fd. Chem., 108: 907-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.11.058[CrossRef]
- Ross, J.A. and Kasum, C.M., 2002. Annu. Rev. Nutr., 22:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.111401.144957[CrossRef]
- Saleheen, D., Ali, S.A. and Yasinzai, M.M., 2004. Fitoterapia, 5: 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2003.07.010[CrossRef]
- Santas, J., Carbo, R., Gordon, M.H. and Almajano, M.P., 2008. Fd. Chem., 107: 1210-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.056[CrossRef]
- Sharma, S., Sharma, K. and Sharma, R., 2003. J. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl., 1: 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(02)03895-2[CrossRef]
- Shati, A.A. and Alamri, S.A., 2010. J. Med., 31: 1106– 13.
- Turkez, H., Yousef, M.I. and Geyikoglu, F., 2010. Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 48: 2741– 2746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.06.049[CrossRef]
- Verstraeten, S.V., Aimo, L. and Oteiza, P.L., 2008. Arch. Toxicol., 82: 789-802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-008-0345-3[CrossRef]
- Yoshinar, O., Shiojina, Y. and Igarashi, K., 2012. Nutrients, 4: 1518-1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4101518[CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.Z., Sun, H., Yang , F.U., Wang, J., Song, M., Li, YF. and Milao, L.G., 2014. Life Sci., 102: 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2014.02.035[CrossRef]
Services
Article usage statistics
Loading…
