ResearchersLinks

Short Communication · Volume 52, Issue 1, 13 November 2019 · Open Access

Isolation and Characterization of 25 Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers of Sepiella japonica

· · · ·

Affiliations & Notes ⌄
  1. 1Fishery College, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China 2National Engineering Research Center for Marine Aquaculture, Zhoushan 316022, China , * Corresponding author: 18368081585@163.com
Article Info ⌄
Journal:
Pakistan Journal of Zoology
Published:
13 November 2019

Abstract

Sepiella japonica was once one of the major fisheries in Zhejiang province of China. The availability of highly polymorphic markers was important to conduct the conservation of S. japonica. In this study, next-generation sequencing and de novo assembly were used for potential useful microsatellite markers obtaining of S. japonica. A total of 120 microsatellite markers were designed and tested, 25 primer pairs showed polymorphism among S. japonica individuals. Number of alleles, observed and expected heterozygosity per locus ranged from 2 to 8, 0.083 to 0.922 and 0.042 to 0.866, respectively. The PIC ranged from 0.04 to 0.829. These markers will be useful in evaluation germplasm and genetic composition in the further research.

Materials and methods

Samples of S. japonica were collected from the aquaculture farm of Zhoushan (China) and one of them (female) was send to BioMarker Biotech Inc. for High-throughput transcriptome. Tissue samples of eyestalk, peduncle, tentacle, gill, muscle and ovary were rapidly sampled, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C prior to RNA extraction. And tissues samples were pooled in equal amounts for total RNA extraction, transcriptome Illumina sequencing and de novo assembly. Putative SSR markers were screened using the SSRHUNTER 1.3 software (http://www.biosoft.net/dna/SSRHunter.htm). The criteria used in SSRHUNTER to identify microsatellites were as follows: 6 repeats for di-nucleotide, 5 repeats for tri-nucleotide and tetranucleotide. Primers were designed using the PRIMER 5.0 program (http://www.premierbiosoft.com/).

Polymorphism evaluation was tested using 30 S. japonica individuals. Genomic DNA was isolated from muscle tissue by proteinase K digestion followed by a standard phenol-chloroform method. Amplification was carried out in a volume of 25µL, which contained approximately 100ng of DNA as template, 2.5µL dNTP (2.5 mM each), 2.5 µL 10×buffer,2µL MgCl2 (20 mM), 1µL primers (10 mM each), and 0.25µL of Taq DNA polymerase (5U/μL). Polymerase chain reaction were run under the following thermal cycle condition: at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 1 min, 45s at the optimal annealing temperature of primers (Table I), and extending 72°C for 1.5 min, and an extra extension 72°C for 10 min. The products of PCR were electrophoresed on 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gels for 4-5 h at 12 W. The sizes of the alleles were estimated according to the 8 bp DNA ladder. Finally, the target bands were visualized by silver staining.

The expected and observed heterozygosity (HE and HO, respectively), allele number (NA), polymorphism information content (PIC) were analyzed using the CERVUS 3.0 . Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and Tested for linkage disequilibrium (LD) were calculated by GENEPOP 4.0 . All results for multiple tests were corrected using Bonferroni’s correction .

Table I.- Characterization of 25 polymorphic microsatellite loci in Sepiella japonica.

Locus

Repeat motif

Primer sequence (5'-3')

TA (°C)

NA

Expe cted size (bp)

HO

HE

PIC

Accession No.

SSR40

(AGC)5

F: CCAGACACAGTAGGTTGCTT

54

6

198- 210

0.25

0.643

0.593

MH492333

R: AAGAAGAATTAGGCAGGCACTT

SSR39

(TC)7

F: GGTCATCTCTGGTAAGATTCAC

49

7

180- 200

0.417

0.866

0.829

MH492334

R: TCTGGTTCTCCGCCTGTT

SSR49

(AT)6

F: ACTGCTACGGCGACACTT

52

6

178-186

0.125

0.56

0.519

MH492335

R: GTTCATCTTCTTGTAACGTGGA

SSR52

(AT)6

F: TACTGCCTCCTGGTTACTATGT

58

6

220 -232

0.125

0.657

0.604

MH492336

R: CTGAATTGAAACTGCACCTGAA

SSR54

(TG)6

F: ACTGAAACTTGAAAGGAAGGGA

55

6

196- 220

0.833

0.781

0.736

MH492337

R: CTGTCTGAAAGTCGTCACTTGT

SSR53

(AT)6

F: TTCCCTGATGTAAACACCAAGT

56

200- 212

0.292

0.827

0.788

MH492338

R: CCGGTCAGTACACCTTCAAT

SSR56

(TG)6

F: CCTTCCTTAACTGCTCTTCGTA

53

8

120- 148

0.792

0.558

0.479

MH492339

R: CACACTCTCATTCACTTACACA

SSR57

(AT)6

F: AACGAGGGACGCTGGAAAT

55

3

156- 164

0.083

0.298

0.272

MH492340

R: GCAGTGCAAACAGACTCAGT

SSR58

(AG)6

F: AACCATAATGGTAGGCAGAGA

54

6

140- 152

0.429

0.789

0.74

MH492341

R: CTCTTTCACTCACTCTCACTCT

SSR62

(TAA)5

F: AAACGCTAACAAAGACGAATGG

55

2

120 -125

0.217

0.264

0.225

MH492342

R: GCTTCCAACACAAACCTCTATC

SSR70

(CA)6

F: TCTTCCCTTCGGAACAGACATA

61

2

130- 142

0.083

0.082

0.077

MH492343

R: CCACCTGACTCGCAATAGC

SSR73

(TGC)5

F: GCTTGCGAGGAAGATGAAGG

58

2

120- 130

0.042

0.042

0.04

MH492344

R: AGCACCATTGACAATACTACCA

SSR80

(AT)6

F: CCCAATAATATGTTTCTCGTCG

48

3

210- 222

0.25

0.228

0.206

MH492345

R: GCCATCCACTGGTGTTAGAT

SSR86

(CA)6

F: TCCGCAAACACATTTAGAGAAC

50

2

220 -232

0.125

0.12

0.11

MH492346

R: CCGTGATGACCTGGCAGAA

Locus

Repeat motif

Primer sequence (5'-3')

TA (°C)

NA

Expe cted size (bp)

HO

HE

PIC

Accession No.

SSR89

(AG)6

F: TGAGCAGCACTAAACAGAATCT

55

5

152- 164

0.922

0.624

0.533

MH492347

R: AGAGACAGCACTAACTGGAATG

SSR91

(CAC)5

F: CTGTATCTCTTCTGCCTCTTCA

58

6

100 -120

0.375

0.629

0.572

MH492348

R: CGTTGTTGTTGTTGTTGCTATC

SSR95

(GT)6

F: AGCATTACAACAATGACAAGGC

55

5

155- 180

0.864

0.807

0.754

MH492349

R: AGAATGTTCCCAGGCAATGAAA

SSR98

(TA)6

F: CACTAATACTGCAACACACA

56

6

215- 227

0.579

0.747

0.694

MH492350

R: ATCAGGCAGTGGTCTCTT

SSR100

(AT)6

F: CAATACGAACATCGCCAGAAC

55

4

170- 185

0.892

0.611

0.519

MH492351

R: TGTTGGTAGTGTTGGAATGGAA

SSR103

(GT)6

F: ATGTGACCTCTACTGCTGACC

54

4

200-220

0.565

0.699

0.623

MH492352

R: CCTCACAAGCATTAAGCTACCA

SSR104

(GA)6

F: CTTCAGAGCCAAAGAAAGTCAT

55

4

108-120

0.333

0.698

0.624

MH492353

R: CCCTCACAACATCTTCCAGTTA

SSR3

(ATA)7

F: CAAGCTGATGAATTAGCGATGA

52

4

200-221

0.231

0.702

0.622

MH492329

R: TCCTTCTGGCATATTCCCTG

SSR6

(AG)9

F: ATCAGGATGCGACATTAGGC

55

8

180-210

0.625

0.855

0.806

MH492330

R: GCTTGACAACACTTGGCTCA

SSR16

(GCAC)5

F: TGACCAAATGACAGGGAACA

54

7

140-170

0.846

0.794

0.732

MH492331

R: ACTTCTCCTCATGGTGGTGG

SSR17

(TCG)7

F: AACCTGTTCGCACTTTGTCA

56

8

220-240

0.211

0.801

0.752

MH492332

R: CAGTGAAGAGGCACGTTCAA

TA, annealing temperature; NA, observed number of alleles; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, expected heterozygosity; PIC, polymorphic information content. *Significant deviation from HWE (P < 0.05).

Results and discussion

A total of 13,471 simple sequence repeats were identified from 58,224 unigenes, which included 1693 di-nucleotide, 1761 tri-nucleotide, and 139 quad-nucleotide simple sequence repeats. 120 primers were designed base on repetition times and flaking sequence priority. 98 of the 120 primers were successfully amplified, but only 25 loci showed polymorphic (Table I). Number of alleles, observed and expected heterozygosity per locus ranged from 2 to 8, 0.083 to 0.922 and 0.042 to 0.866, respectively. The PIC ranged from 0.04 to 0.829. Three loci significantly deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction (P <0.05), but no significant linkage disequilibrium was found between all these loci.

The results of this study indicated that high throughput sequencing technology based on transcriptome was an effective method for developing microsatellite markers of S. japonica. These microsatellite markers will be helpful for further S. japonica germplasm and genetic composition evaluation.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ping Hong-Ling and Zhang Tao for sample collection. This study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41676153; 41406138), the Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang province (2015F50055) and the Scientific Research Start-up Funds of Zhejiang Ocean University.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang K.M. and Wu, C.W., 2009. J. Zhejiang Ocean Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 28: 257-263.
  2. Csencsics, D., Brodbeck, S. and Holderegger, R., 2010. J. Hered., 101: 789-793. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esq069[CrossRef]
  3. Guo, B.Y., Qi, P.Z., Zhu, A.Y., Lv, Z.M., Wang, W.C. and Wu, C.W., 2013. Genet. mol. Res., 12: 2376-2379. https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.December.19.5[CrossRef]
  4. Kalinowski, S.T., Taper, M.L. and Marshall, T.C., 2007. Mol. Ecol., 16: 1099-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x[CrossRef]
  5. Li, J.J., Guo, B.Y. and Wu, C.W., 2011. J. Zhejiang Ocean Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 30: 381-386.
  6. Rajwant, K.K., Manoj, K.R., Sanjay, K., Rohtas, S. and Dhawan, A.K., 2011. Euphytica, 177: 309-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0286-9[CrossRef]
  7. Rice, W.R., 1989. Evolution, 43: 223-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x[CrossRef]
  8. Rousset, F., 2008. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 8: 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x[CrossRef]
  9. Shan, B., Liu, Y., Yang, C., Liu, S. and Sun, D., 2018. Pakistan J. Zool., 50: 2273-2278
  10. Song, W.W. and Wang, C.L., 2009. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin., 40: 590-595.
  11. Wu, C.W., Chi, C.F., He, G.Y., Lü, Z. and Xu, M., 2010. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 29: 121-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-010-0083-2[CrossRef]
  12. Wu, C.W., Zhao, S.J. and Xu, D.N., 2006. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 37: 231-237.
  13. Yu, J.N., Won, C., Jun, J., Lim, Y.W. and Kwak, M., 2011. PLoS One, 6: e26933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026933[CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, H., Senalik, D., McCown, B.H., Zeldin, E.L., Speers, J., Hyman, J., Bassil, N., Hummer, K., Simon, P.W. and Zalapa, J.E., 2012. Theoret. appl. Genet., 124: 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1787-9[CrossRef]

Services

Article usage statistics

Loading…

Isolation and Characterization of 25 Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers of Sepiella japonica · ResearchersLinks