Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Carapace Length–Weight, Carapace Width–Weight Relationships and Relative Condition Factor of Four Portunid Crab Species of the Gulf of Mannar, Southeast Coast of India

PJZ_56_5_2411-2417

Carapace Length–Weight, Carapace Width–Weight Relationships and Relative Condition Factor of Four Portunid Crab Species of the Gulf of Mannar, Southeast Coast of India

Adyasha Sahu1*, V. K. Venkataramani1, Natarajan Jayakumar1,

Durairaja Ramulu1, Preetysh Nanda Patnaik1 and Sudhan Chandran2

1Department of Fisheries Biology and Resource Management, TNJFU-Fisheries College and Research Institute, Thoothukudi–628 008, Tamil Nadu, India.

2Fisheries Resources, Harvest and Post-Harvest Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, Maharashtra–400061, India

ABSTRACT

Carapace Length–Weight (CLW) and Carapace Width–Weight (CWW) relationships by sex, combined with Relative Condition Factor (Kn) are presented for four commercially important portunid crab species viz., Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758), Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783), Portunus gladiator Fabricius, 1798 and Charybdis natator (Herbst, 1794) collected from the Gulf of Mannar, Southeast coast of India. A total of 1,391 specimens were collected and measured from January to June 2022. All CLW and CWW relationships were linear (R2 >0.95 and R2 >0.91 respectively). The slope (b) of the CLWR ranged between 2.8210 and 3.2862 whereas the same was between 2.0099 and 3.1033 for CWWR for these four species. The relationship for the above two parameters were also established with regression coefficient of corelation and the 99% confident interval using ANOVA (MS Excel version 2016). The relationship of the studied two parameters namely carapace CLW and CWW were found to be significant between all the selected species at 1% level (P > 0.01). The Relative Condition factor (Kn) showed wide variations among these four species between CLWR and CWWR. This study presents the first reference on CLWR and CWWR for these species from the Gulf of Mannar. In addition, it also reports CLWR and CWWR for P. gladiator for the first time and for C. natator for which only limited information is available.


Article Information

Received 10 October 2022

Revised 25 April 2023

Accepted 16 May 2023

Available online 13 October 2023

(early access)

Published 14 August 2024

Authors’ Contribution

AS sample collection, species identification and preparing the manuscript. VKV formal analysis and reviewing the draft of manuscript. NJ literature collection and critical reviewing of the manuscript. DR visualization, and investigation. PNP laboratory observation and data curation. SC conceptualization and technical contribution on data analysis.

Key words

Portunid crabs, CLWR, CWWR, Condition factor, Gulf of Mannar

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20221010101012

* Corresponding author: adyashasahu6@gmail.com

0030-9923/2024/0005-2411 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2024 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

Among crustacean brachyuran crabs are most diversified group (Rajaraman et al., 2015). There are 990 species of marine brachyuran crabs in Indian waters, which are divided into 281 genera and 36 families (Myla Chakravarty et al., 2015). 404 species of crabs from 26 families and 152 genera can be found along the coast of Tamil Nadu (Kathirvel, 2008). The dominant Portunid crabs along Gulf of mannar are Calappa, Scylla, Portunus, Charybdis, Thalamita (Vidya et al., 2017). Portunus pelagicus and P. sanguinolentus together constitute 90% of the crab landings in the Indian coast (Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997). Charybdis natator contributes to crab fishery in India and it is believed that it can reduce the subsequent entry of P. pelagicus in a trap due to agonistic interaction (Sumpton, 1990). P. gladiator also contribute to a major part of crab fishery along Gulf of Mannar (Vidya et al., 2017).

According to (Dulcic and Kraljevic, 1996; Ikhwanuddin et al., 2010), the length-weight relationship is the most reliable method for estimating fish and crustacean populations in the area. Length weight relationships reveal taxonomic differences and life history events in fishes and crustaceans (Jaiswar and Kulkarni, 2002) and thought to be helpful in calculating biomass, condition indices, and various other population dynamics aspects (Atar and Secer, 2003). Additionally, it is used to determine whether the species have isometric or allometric somatic growth conditions (LeCren, 1951; Ricker, 1975). Any change in this relationship indicates a change in the animal’s physiology, habitat ecology, or both (Jaiswar and Kulkarni, 2002). There have been numerous studies done on the length-weight relationships of commercially significant crab species (Sukumaran and Neelkantan, 1997; Gokc et al., 2006; Mohapatra et al., 2010; Josileen, 2011; Oluwatoyin et al., 2013; Khan and Mustaqeem, 2013; Vidya et al., 2018). In the present account, the carapace length/ width-weight and carapace length-width relationships in Portunus pelagicus, Portunus sanguinolentus, Portunus gladiator and Charybdis natator reported since similar studies in brachyurans are limited.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

The Gulf of Mannar (GoM) is situated in the Indian Ocean between south-eastern part of India and north-western part of Sri Lanka, ranging 8° 35’ N - 9° 25’ N latitude to 78° 08’ E- 79° 30’ E longitude (Vidya et al., 2018). It is known for its unique biological wealth and is a store house of marine diversity of global significance. The four commercially important portunid crab species viz., Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pulli nandu), Portunus sanguinolentus (Herbst, 1783) (Mukkannu nandu), Portunus gladiator Fabricius, 1798 (Chippi nandu) and Charybdis natator (Herbst, 1794) (Par nandu) covering a wide range of size were collected weekly from the four major landing centres of the Gulf of Mannar namely Vedalai, Keelakarai, Therespuram and Thiruchendur for a period of six months from January 2022 to June 2022 (Fig. 1). The specimens were collected from various fishing gears like bottom set gillnet, trawl net and trammel net from which bottom set gillnet dominate the crab fishery along the entire Gulf of Mannar region. The mesh size of this bottom set gillnet operated in Vedalai and Keelakarai varies between 70 and 110 mm whereas in Therespuram and Tiruchendur it varies between 28 and 40 mm. It is noted that the mesh size of cod end of trawl net and trammel net in the study area were 15-20 mm and 40-80 mm respectively. The crabs were collected up to a distance of 7 to 15 nautical miles towards seaward side and depth range of 6–12 m in Gulf of Mannar region.

Identification key of four selected portunid crabs

The portunid crabs were identified up to species level using FAO species identification sheet (Fischer and Bianchi, 1984); CMFRI identification manual (Josileen et al., 2017) (Fig. 2).

Genus Portunus: Anterolateral carapace cut into nine teeth with last one enlarged as a long spine and propodus of cheliped costate.

P. pelagicus: Nine spine at distal end of posterior border of merus of cheliped; Front with 4 teeth; inner margin of merus of cheliped with 3 spines

P. sanguinolentus: Carapace with three purple to red spots on posterior half; no spine on posterior border of merus of cheliped.

P. gladiator: No spot on dactylus of last ambulatory legs; granules of the meso-gastric region form (T) shape.

Genus Charybdis: Anterolateral border of carapace oblique and arched, cut into six teeth, no spine on posterior border of arm of cheliped.

C. natator: Carapace with distinct ridges or granular patches behind level of last pair of anterolateral teeth.

 

 

Data collection

The carapace length was measured from the front tooth of the rear end of the carapace along the midline while the carapace width was measured as a distance between the tips of the posterior most lateral carapace spines. The carapace length/ width was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and body weight to the nearest 0.01 g using the vernier calliper and sensitive electronic balance. In the present study, the carapace length for P. pelagicus was ranged from 30 to 83 mm; carapace width ranged from 46 to 156 mm and weight ranged from 21 to 469 g. The carapace length of P. sanguinolentus was varied between 27 to 75 mm, carapace width ranged from 37 to 148 mm and weight ranged from 11–331.5 g. The carapace length of P. gladiator ranged from 28 to 62 mm, carapace width ranged from 39-96 mm and 17-143.5 g of weight was recorded. The carapace length recorded for C. natator in the present study varied between 34 to 89 mm, 54 to 128 mm of carapace width and 28.5 to 510 g of weight.

Statistical analysis

The CLWR and CWWR for the four species were established by using the least square linear regression equation W= aLb, where ‘W’ is the body weight in gm, ‘L’ is the carapace length/ width in cm, ‘a’ is the intercept and ‘b’ is the slope of the regression curve (Le Cren, 1951) considering the sexes separate. The degree of association between the variables was computed by the determination of coefficient, R2. Outliers were removed before linear regression analysis. The statistical significance, 95% confidence limits of the parameters ‘a’ and ‘b’ were calculated using regression analysis. All analyses were performed using MS Excel (Microsoft Office, 2016).

Results

Weekly samples were taken along the entire coast of Gulf of Mannar from the four landing centres (Fig. 2). Statistical description of the parameters including sample size (number of specimens observed), carapace length (CL)/ carapace width (CW) range (cm), total body weight (W) range (gm), length weight relationship (LWR) parameters ‘a’ and “b” with 95% confidence limits and coefficient of determination (R2) are shown in Table I. A positive allometry was evident in sexes between carapace length and body weight for P. pelagicus, P. sanguinolentus with high degree of correlation. However, a negative allometry growth in sexes was evident for P. gladiator and C. natator with a high degree of corelation. With regard to carapace width–body weight, a negative allometry was evident in sexes for P. pelagicus, P. sanguinolentus and P. gladiator (<3), however a positive allometry was evident for C. natator (>3). The relative condition factor (Kn) for the selected four portunid crab species of Gulf of Mannar with regard to CLWR and CWWR are shown in Table II. The overall wellbeing condition (Kn) was found to be high for C. natator and P. pelagicus while the same was less for P. sanguinolentus for CLWR while for CWWR the Kn value was found to be high for P. sanguinolentus and less for C. natator. The reason behind high Kn value for C. natator and P. pelagicus may be due to landing of higher female sex ratio during the study period as study shows that mean condition factors always higher in females than in males, due to the heavier gonads in the former (Noori et al., 2015).

 

Table I. Estimated CLW and CWW parameters for four commercially important portunid crab species from Gulf of Mannar, India.

Species

n

CL (cm)

Min-

Max

CW (cm)

Min-

Max

BW (g)

Min-Max

Regression parameters (CLW)

Regression parameters (CWW)

a

95% CI a

b

95% CI b

R2

a

95% CI a

b

95% CI b

R2

Portunus pelagicus

Male

184

3-7.5

4.6-14

21-372

0.75

0.70-0.80

3.27

3.18-3.36

0.96

0.73

0.68-0.78

2.52

2.45-2.58

0.96

Female

248

4.2-8.3

6.2-15.6

48.5-469

0.82

0.78-0.86

3.12

3.06-3.18

0.98

0.75

0.70-0.80

2.47

2.41-2.53

0.97

Pooled

432

3-8.3

4.6-15.6

21-469

0.85

0.81-0.88

3.09

3.04-3.15

0.96

0.77

0.74-0.81

2.44

2.40-2.49

0.96

Portunus sanguinolentus

Male

145

2.8-7.5

3.7-14.8

11-331.5

0.75

0.70-0.81

3.18

3.07-3.29

0.96

0.09

0.01-0.01

2.00

1.92-2.09

0.96

Female

147

3-7.4

4.3-14.1

10-305

0.70

0.65-0.76

3.28

3.18-3.39

0.96

0.72

0.65-0.80

2.45

2.35-2.55

0.95

Pooled

292

2.8-7.5

3.7-14.8

11-331.5

0.72

0.69-0.76

3.24

3.17-3.31

0.96

0.90

0.85-0.96

2.22

2.16-2.29

0.95

Portunus gladiator

Male

222

2.8-5.6

3.9-8.6

17-116

0.88

0.83-0.93

2.91

2.87-2.99

0.95

0.83

0.77-0.90

2.40

2.30-2.49

0.91

Female

121

2.9-6.2

4.2-9.6

17.5-143.5

0.91

0.83-0.99

2.82

2.67-2.96

0.95

0.92

0.80-1.06

2.21

2.03-2.39

0.91

Pooled

343

2.8-6.2

3.9-9.6

17-143.5

0.83

0.80-0.86

2.99

2.93-3.05

0.96

0.74

0.69-0.79

2.53

2.44-2.61

0.92

Charybdis natator

Male

192

4.8-8.9

6.6-12.8

56.5-510

0.88

0.81-0.96

2.99

2.88-3.09

0.96

0.49

0.45-0.55

3.07

2.96-3.19

0.95

Female

132

3.4-6.5

5.4-9.8

28.5-211.5

0.91

0.84-0.98

2.97

2.86-3.08

0.95

0.50

0.43-0.58

3.04

2.88-3.21

0.90

Pooled

324

3.4-8.9

5.4-12.8

28.5-510

0.93

0.88-0.98

2.92

2.85-2.99

0.97

0.48

0.44-0.52

3.10

3.01-3.18

0.96

 

n, sample size; CL, carapace length; CW, carapace width; BW, total body weight; a, intercept; b, slope; CI, confidence intervals; R2, co-efficient of determination

 

Table II. Relative condition factor (Kn) of selected portunid crab species from Gulf of Mannar.

Species

Kn- value with regard to CLWR

Kn value with regard to CWWR

Portunus pelagicus

0.8128

0.7256

Portunus sanguinolentus

0.6625

0.8899

Portunus gladiator

0.7574

0.7106

Charybdis natator

0.9059

0.5614

 

A significant relationship at 1% level was evident using ANOVA (MS Excel version 2016), between species for P. pelagicus and P. sanguinolentus; P. pelagicus and P. gladiator; P. pelagicus and C. natator; P. sanguinolentus and P. gladiator; P. sanguinolentus and C. natator and P. gladiator with C. natator between CLW (Table III) and between CWW (Table IV).

Discussion

The coefficient of determination (R2) for CLWR and CWWR for both sexes of all these four species was very close to one in the regression analysis (Table I). Thus, the nature of the relationship between CL and BW and CW and BW can be expressed as highly positive. The value of exponent (b) is a very important indicator for judging the

 

Table III. Test of significance for carapace length-weight (CLW) among all studied species.

Source of variation

Degree of freedom

Sum of square

Mean square

Observed F

Difference between Regression

1

46.2499

46.2499

20698.15*

Deviation from individual within P. pelagicus and P. sanguinolentus

723

1.6155

0.0022

Difference between Regression

1

77.2620

77.2620

33893.46*

Deviation from individual within P. pelagicus and P. gladiator

773

1.7620

0.0022

Difference between Regression

1

30.6432

30.6432

13762.51*

Deviation from individual within P. pelagicus and C. natator

754

1.6788

0.0022

Difference between Regression

1

40.4805

40.4805

20286.91*

Deviation from individual P. sanguinolentus and P. gladiator

634

1.2650

0.0019

Difference between Regression

1

37.5604

37.5604

14215.91*

Deviation from individual P. sanguinolentus and C. natator

615

1.6249

0.0026

Difference between Regression

1

56.7088

56.7088

22175.71*

Deviation from individual P. gladiator and C. natator

665

1.7005

0.0025

 

* Significant at 1% level.

 

Table IV. Test of significance for carapace width-body weight (CWW) among all studied species.

Source of variation

DF

Sum of square

Mean square

Observed F

Difference between Regression

1

45.3010

45.3010

12774.06*

Deviation from individual within P. pelagicus and P. sanguinolentus

723

2.5639

0.0035

Difference between Regression

1

77.2918

77.2918

34488.09*

Deviation from individual within P. pelagicus and P. gladiator

773

1.7323

0.0022

Difference between Regression

1

27.2032

27.2032

4006.98*

Deviation from individual within P. pelagicus and C. natator

754

5.1188

0.0067

Difference between Regression

1

38.9847

38.9847

8952.67*

Deviation from individual P. sanguinolentus and P. gladiator

634

2.7607

0.0043

Difference between Regression

1

30.7910

30.7910

2255.98*

Deviation from individual P. sanguinolentus and C. natator

615

8.3939

0.0136

Difference between Regression

1

55.6829

55.6829

13581.49*

Deviation from individual P. gladiator and C. natator

665

2.7264

0.0040

 

* Significant at 1% level.

 

growth pattern of a species. However, ecological factors (i.e., food availability, water quality parameters, sample size, and length range) can cause variation in slope (b) in the case of any species (Mommsen, 1998; Ighwela et al., 2011).

Generally, the slope value (b) is usually three in the length weight relationship of most of the decapod crustaceans, but due to changing of specific gravity and shape of the body contour the cube law need not hold good (Rounsefell and Everhart, 1953). Morphological changes due to age also cause the coefficient of logarithmic of weight on logarithmic of length to depart substantially from 3.0. In the present study, the slope value is more than three for two species namely P. pelagicus and P. sanguinolentus indicating positive allometric growth and less than three for P. gladiator and C. natator indicating a negative allometric growth pattern in relation to CLWR. With regard to CWWR, the slope value (b) lies below three for three species, except C. natator, thus showing a marked deviation from the isometric growth pattern, indicating negative allometric growth.

However, on comparing the sexes with regard to CLWR, the slope value (b) shows variation. The males of P. pelagicus and P. gladiator have a higher exponent value compared to females while in P. sanguinolentus, the slope value is higher in females compared to males and exponent value is almost similar between sexes in C. natator (Table I). From this, it is evident that males are heavier than females in P. pelagicus and P. gladiator, whereas in P. sanguinolentus the females are heavier than males. In C. natator, the growth of the males and females do not show any variation at a given length or body weight. In the present study, the growth of males is higher compared to females which is in agreement with the observation made by Sukumaran and Neelakantan (1997), Josileen (2011) and Vidya et al. (2018) for P. pelagicus. The higher slope values in males comparing with females was also observed by Thirunavukkarasu and Shanmugam (2011) in Scylla tranquebarica in Parangipettai coast of southeast coast of India. Afzaal (2017) observed that growth of females was high compared to males in this species. In the present study, comparing the sexes of P. sanguinolentus, the females were found to be heavier compared to males. However, Sukumaran and Neelakantan (1997) and Vidya et al. (2018) observed males with higher growth rate compared to females in P. sanguinolentus. In the present study, the exponent value is very close to three in C. natator indicating the isometric growth. Similar exponent value nearing three was also observed by Vidya et al. (2018) for females of C. natator.

Presently, with regard to CWWR for P. pelagicus, P. gladiator and C. natator, the slope value is higher in male compared to female while in P. sanguinolentus the female showed a higher slope value comparing with male. A similar observation was also observed by Sukumaran and Neelakantan (1997) and Vidya et al. (2018) for P. pelagicus. In Scylla serrata, a similar relationship was observed by Khan and Mustaqeem (2013). A deviation was recorded by Afzaal et al. (2017) in which female showed higher growth rate compared to male. In the present study, the slope value was found to be higher in female compared to male for P. sanguinolentus. A higher growth in male compared to female was observed by Sukumaran and Neelakantan (1997) and Vidya et al. (2018) for this species.

Further, relative condition factor (Kn) is the important biological parameters which indicate the suitability of a specific water body for growth of fish (LeCren, 1951). Condition factor has been used as an index of growth and feeding intensity (Fagade, 1979). It is also reported to decrease with increase in length (Bakare, 1970; Fagade, 1979) and influences the reproductive cycle in fish (Welcome, 1979). The condition factor (Kn) showed variation between carapace length-weight (0.6625 – 0.9059) and carapace width-weight relationship (0.5614 – 0.8899) which may be influenced by the seasonal changes of gonads, feeding intensity, habitat and other environmental factors (Dubey et al., 2014). The Kn value for Scylla serrata and S. tranquebarica were 0.83–1.21 and 0.76–1.35 reported in Chilika lagoon, east coast of India (Mahapatra et al., 2010) which supports the present study (Table II) as Kn value of the selected species has not been attempted in India by the earlier workers.

Conclusions

The present studies provide the first detailed information on carapace length/ width-weight relationship of P. gladiator and C. natator along the Gulf of Mannar coast. For the rest two species has also limited information in the study area. For successful development, management practices and production, it can serve as a guide for future research by fishery biologists and conservation biologists. The fishing of juvenile and berried crabs is currently permitted in many nations, and the minimum size at capture is not strictly enforced. Release of young, berried, and soft crabs into the ocean while they are still alive is the sole alternative for conservation. The greatest strategy to guarantee a year-round sustainable fishery while simultaneously enhancing yield quality is to forbid the capture and sale of undersized and berried crabs. The relative condition factor also provides the status of portunid crabs throughout the study period which may further help to the crab biologist to understand the developmental biology.

Acknowledgments

This study is a part of the first author’s M.F.Sc. dissertation. The authors would like to thank the Vice-Chancellor, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India, and the Dean, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, India for providing the necessary resources and supporting the study.

Funding

Funding was provided by “TNJFU - Fisheries College & Research Institute, Thoothukudi PG Merit Scholarship”.

IRB approval

For this study, approvals was given by the advisory committee members.

Ethical statement

Not applicable.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Afzaal, Z., Kalhoro, M.A., Buzdar, M.A., Tariq, S., Shafi, M., Nadeem, A., Imran, S., Saeed, F., Sohail, M., Hassan, R. and Haroon, A., 2018. Carapace length-weight and carapace width-weight relationship of Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Pakistani waters northern Arabian Sea.

Atar, H.H. and Secer, S., 2003. Width/length-weight relationships of the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun 1896) population living in Beymelek Lagoon Lake. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 27: 443-447.

Bakare, O., 1970. Bottom deposits as food of inland freshwater fish. A Nigerian man made lake. Kainji Lake studies, vol. 1.

Dubey, S.K., Chakraborty, D.C., Bhattacharya, C. and Choudhury, A., 2014. Allometric relationships of red ghost crab Ocypode macrocera (H. Milne-Edwards, 1852) in Sundarbans mangrove eco-region, India. World J. Fish Mar. Sci., 6: 176-181.

Dulčić, J. and Kraljević, M., 1996. Weight-length relationships for 40 fish species in the eastern Adriatic (Croatian waters). Fish. Res.28: 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(96)00513-9

Fagade, S.O., 1979. Observations on the biology of two species of Tilapia from the Lagos lagoon, Nigeria.

Fischer, W. and Bianchi, G., 1984. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes: Western Indian Ocean (Fishing Area 51). v. 1: Introductory material. Bony fishes, families: Acanthuridae to Clupeidae. -v. 2: Bony fishes, families: Congiopodidae to Lophotidae. -v. 3: families: Lutjanidae to Scaridae. -v. 4: families: Scatophagidae to Trichiuridae. -v. 5: Bony fishes, families: Triglidae to Zeidae. Chimaeras. Sharks. Lobsters. Shrimps and prawns. Sea turtles. v. 6: Alphabetical index of scientific names and vernacular names.

Gokce, G., Erguden, D., Sangun, L., Cekic, M. and Alagoz, S., 2006. Width/length-weight and relationships of the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, 1986) population living in Camlik Lagoon Lake (Yumurtalik). https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.1460.1464

Ighwela, K.A., Ahmed, A.B. and Abol-Munafi, A.B., 2011. Condition factor as an indicator of growth and feeding intensity of Nile tilapia fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus) feed on different levels of maltose. Am. Eur. J. Agric. environ. Sci., 11: 559-563.

Ikhwanuddin, M., Bachok, Z., Hilmi, M.G., Azmie, G. and Zakaria, M.Z., 2010. Species diversity, carapace width-bodyweight relationship, size distribution and sex ratio of mud crab, genus Scylla from setiu wetlands of Terengganu coastal waters, Malaysia. J. Sustain. Sci. Manage.5: 97-109.

Jaiswar, A.K. and Kulkarni, B.G., 2002. Length-weight relationship of intertidal molluscs from Mumbai, India.

Josileen, J., 2011. Morphometrics and length-weight relationship in the blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda, Brachyura) from the Mandapam Coast, India. Crustaceana, 84: 1665-1681. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854011X607060

Josileen, J., Maheswarudu, G., Jinesh, P.T., Sreesanth, L., Ragesh, N., Pillai, S.L. and Chakraborty, R.D., 2017. A brief note on portunid crab, Charybdis (Goniohellenus) omanensis septentrionalis from southwest coast of India. Mar. Fish. Inf. Ser. Tech. Ext. Ser., 231: 26-26.

Kathirvel, M., 2008. Biodiversity of Indian marine brachyuran crabs. Rajiv Gandhi Chair Spec. Publ.7: 67-78.

Khan, M.A. and Mustaqeem, J., 2013. Carapace width weight relationship of mud crab Scylla serrata (Forskal, 1775) from Karachi Coast. Can. J. Pure appl. Sci., 7: 2381-2386.

Le Cren, E.D., 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J. Anim. Ecol., 20: 201-219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540

Mohapatra, A., Mohanty, R.K., Mohanty, S.K. and Dey, S.K., 2010. Carapace width and weight relationships, condition factor, relative condition factor and gonado-somatic index (GSI) of mud crabs (Scylla spp.) from Chilika Lagoon, India.

Mommsen, T.P., 1998. Growth and metabolism. The physiology of fishes.

Myla Chakravarty, M.S., Ganesh, P.R.C., Amarnath, D., Sudha, B.S. and Vivek, V., 2015. Diversity of crabs in Tekkali creek, Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh. Int. J. Fish. aquat. Stud.4: 414-418.

Noori, A., Moghaddam, P., Kamrani, E., Akbarzadeh, A., Neitali, B.K. and Pinheiro, M.A.A., 2015. Condition factor and carapace width versus wet weight relationship in the blue swimming crab Portunus segnisAnim. Biol.65: 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1163/15707563-00002463

Oluwatoyin, A., Akintade, A., Edwin, C. and Victor, K., 2013. A study of length-weight relationship and condition factor of west African blue crab (Callinectes pallidus) from Ojo Creek, Lagos, Nigeria. Am. J. Res. Commun., 1: 102-114.

Rajaraman, P., Durairaj, K., Prabhakaran, D. and Priyadharshini, K., 2015. (Please give reference title). Indo–Asian J. Multidis. Res., 2: 576 - 579.

Ricker, W.E., 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 191: 1-382.

Rounsefell, G.A. and Everhart, W.H., 1953. Fishery science: Its methods and applications. Wiley.

Sukumaran, K.K. and Neelakantan, B., 1997. Length-weight relationship in two marine portunid crabs, Portunus (Portunus) sanguinolentus (Herbst) and Portunus (Portunus) pelagicus (Linnaeus) from the Karnataka coast. Indian J. mar. Sci., 26: 39-42.

Sumpton, W.D., 1990. Morphometric growth and fisheries biology of the crab, Charybdis natator (Herbst) in Moreton Bay, Australia (Decapoda, Brachyura). Crustaceana, 59: 113-120.

Thirunavukkarasu, N. and Shanmugam, A., 2011. Length-weight and width-weight relationships of mud crab Scylla tranquebarica (Fabricius, 1798). Eur. J. appl. Sci., 3: 67-70. https://doi.org/10.18000/ijabeg.10048

Vidhya, V., Jawahar, P., Padmavathy, P. and Karuppasamy, K., 2017. Morphometrics and length-weight relationship of Charybdis natator from Gulf of Mannar. India. Appl. Sci., 7: 797-808.

Welcome, R.L., 197917. Fisheries ecology of flood plain rivers. LongMan Press, London. pp. 317.

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

August

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 4, pp. 1501-2000

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe