Research Article

 

Evaluation the Impact of Different Levels of Propolis on Some Reproductive features in Iraqi Local Roosters

 

Sura Safi Obayes Khafaji*, Thamer Kareem ALjanabi, Salam Merza Suhailaltaie

Department of Animal production, Agriculture College, Kerbala University, Iraq.

 

Editor | Kuldeep Dhama, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Received | September 12, 2018; Accepted | November 01, 2018; Published | November 20, 2018

*Correspondence | Sura Safi Obayes Khafaji, Department of Animal production, Agriculture College, Kerbala University, Iraq; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Khafaji SSO, Aljanabi TK, Suhailaltaie SM (2019). Evaluation the impact of different levels of propolis on some reproductive features in iraqi local roosters. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 7(2): 82-87.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2019/7.2.82.87

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

 

Copyright © 2019 Khafaji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Introduction

 

In Iraq, the development of poultry industry required modern strategies to improve roosters fertility, conversion of feeding habits and production that were achieved by applying feed additives (Hassan et al., 2010). Antibiotics are widely used in several countries to promote poultry growth, but they have side effects on general health of chicken due to basic materials precipitation in the tissues and eggs of birds that will be reflected on consumers’ health (Aziz, 1981; El-Ghamry et al., 2002). Al-Beitawi and El-Ghousein, 2008; Al-Khafaji, 2013a and Khafaji, 2018a resorted to apply the natural additives and herbal medical plants like celery (Apiumgraveolens), black cumin Nigella sativa, coriander (Coriandrum sativum),ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomumzeylanicum) and Thyme to improve the general health, performance and reproductive activity of poultry without any harmful effects (El- Ghamry et al., 2002; Gunal et al., 2006; Al-Khafaji, 2013b; Khafaji, 2018 b,c).

Propolis, which is a bee glue, is a natural substance, collected from flowers and trees buds, mixed with wax to paint the inner surface and seal the cracks in bees’ hives to prevent the entry of any pathological agents and foreign materials (Burdock, 1998). It is rich in minerals such as Fe, Na, Ca, I, Mg, K, Cu, Mn and Zn; in addition, it contains certain vitamins including E, B2, B6, B1 and C (Banskota et al. 2001a; AL-Sirraj et al., 2018). Furthermore, it possesses various enzymes such as acid phosphatase, succinic dehydrogenase, adenosine triphosphatase and glucose-6-phosphatase (Banskota et al., 2001b).

 

Propolis contains many metabolites, monomers and macromolecules and other substances including Flavonoids, Flavones, aromatic acids, amino acids, fatty acids, diterpenic acids, phenolic acid and vitamins, its composition depends on harvest location, plant source and season (Greenaway et al., 1991), as well as, it is considered a good source of antioxidant, anti-microbial, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and antifungal (Dobrowolski et al., 1991; Bankova, 2005), these attributed to propolis therapeutic application against many diseases such as cardiac diseases, cancer, diabetes mellitus and inflammation (Mishima et al., 2005).

 

Because few or no research studied the propolis’s effect on local white roosters fertility, this experiment was targeted to explore the action of propolis on main reproductive traits of this animals.

 

Materials and Methods

 

Propolis obtained from Al-Noor market of bee, it packed in dark plastic bags in -20C until used. This experiment was done at College of Agriculture/ University of Kerbala, during the period 20/2/2018 to 7/5/2018. A thirty mature local roosters, divided randomly into three equal groups. Treatment 1 group (T1), control group, provided with the basic diet during the experimental period, each rooster of treatment 2 group (T2) received orally with 0.250 g/ day, each rooster of treatment 3 group (T3) administrated orally with 0.5 g/bird day.

 

Testes weight (g), width, length and height (mm) were calculated by digital balance and vernier caliper at the end of study. Blood samples drawn and put in tubs without EDTA agent to obtain serum, which were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The clear serum was transferred carefully into clean and dry vials and kept at -20C until analysis to determine the concentrations of globulin, cholesterol, albumin, and total protein using Tietz’s, 1982 methodology.

 

The reproductive hormones: Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), Interstitial cell – stimulating hormone (ICSH) and Testosterone hormone were estimated in serum by ELIZA technique following Elias and Franey’s, 1968 methodology.

 

Statistical Analysis

Data of this study were calculated by using Complete Random Design (C.R.D). Statistical analysis was done by using system of (SAS, 2001). Statistical significant value was determined at P<0.05 .

 

Results

 

Table 1 explained the impact of Propolis on width (mm), length (mm) and height (mm) and weight (g) of local rooster testes. The mean values of weight, width, length and height were increased significantly (P<0.05) in T2 with mean values (13.105± 0.543, 21.492± 1.645, 34.282 ± 1.645, 17.93 ±1.662) respectively, in comparison with control roosters, as well as T3 roosters were influenced significantly (P<0.05) by porpolis with means (15.369±0.548, 27.496±0.831, 46.2±1.274, 24.078±0.241) respectively, in comparing with T1 roosters at means (9.184±0.542, 16.888±1.155, 23.212±2.766 , 13.034±0.615) respectively.

 

Table 1: Impact of propolis on weight, length, width and height of testes in Local roosters.

 

Parameters/Groups	T1	T2	T3
Weight of testes (g)	0.542 c± 9.184	0.543 b± 13.105	0.548 a± 15.369
Width of testes (cm)	1.155 c±16.888	0.585 b± 21.492	0.831 a± 27.496
Length of testes (cm)	2.766 c± 23.212	1.645 b± 34.282	1.274 a± 46.2
Height of testes(mm)	0.615 c± 13.034	1.662 b± 17.93	0.241 a± 24.078

 

*Data set as mean ± SD.

*The dissimilar letters in the same rows are significantly differences at P<0.05.

 

The results of propolis activity on mean values of total protein, globulin, albumin and cholesterol of local roosters are demonstrated in Table 2. The statistical analysis revealed that the serum globulin and protein in T2 (2.76±0.167 and 5.64±0.31) and T3 treated groups (3.34±0.167 and 6.6±0.39) respectively, increased significantly (P<0.05) in comparison with T1 group.

 

On other hand, the concentrations of cholesterol and albumin were not noted significant levels (P>0.05) in comparison among the three groups of roosters.

 

Table 2: Role of propolis on biochemical parameters in Local rooster.

 

Parameters/Groups	T1	T2	T3
Total protein(g/100ml)	0.29 c± 4.36	0.31 b± 5.64	0.39 a± 6.6
Albumin (g/100ml)	0.29 a± 3.12	0.29 a± 3.36	0.29 a± 3.44
Globulin (g/100ml)	0.178 c± 2.32	0.167 b± 2.76	0.167 a± 3.34
Cholesterol (g/100ml)	4.192 a±126.62	5.283 a± 128.92	7.649 a± 133

 

*Data set as mean ± SD.

*The dissimilar letters in the same rows are significantly differences at P<0.05.

 

Table 3 clarified the concentrations results of Interstitial cell – stimulating hormone (ICSH), Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and Testosterone hormone under effect Propolis. The statistical analysis indicated significant raise (P<0.05) in concentration of FSH, ICSH and Testosterone hormone in T2 (3.788±0.041, 3.544±0.034, 2.965±0.047) and T3with values (4.860±0.129, 4.432±0.044, 4.064±0.243) respectively, when compared with mean value of T1 rooster (02.89±0.083, 2.526±0.054, 1.925±0.086).

 

Table 3: Effect of Propolis on the levels of some Reproductive hormones of Local roosters.

 

Parameters/Groups	T1	T2	T3
FSH(miu/ml)	0.083 c± 02.89	0.041 b±3.788	0.129 a± 4.860
ICSH (miu/ml)	0.054 c±2.526	0.034 b±3.544	0.044 a± 4.432
Testosterone (ng/ml)	0.086 c± 1.925	0.047 b± 2.965	0.243 a±4.064

 

*Data set as mean ± SD.

*The dissimilar letters in the same rows are significantly differences at P<0.05.

 

Discussion

 

The results of this study indicate that the oral administration of propolis to local roosters at individual dose 0.250 and 0.5 g/day for ten weeks- generated beneficial effects on animals health and improved male sexual organ physical and biomarkers parameters related with fertility characteristic. The valuable actions of propolis were characterized by high measurements testes’ characteristics and high serum protein, globulin and reproductive hormones values. These effects may be arbitrated to numerous mechanisms of the active constituents of porpolis.

 

The statistical analysis proved a significant elevation in weight and all physical measurements of testis because the propolis regarded as growth promoter (Meurer et al., 2009; Yousef et al., 2010) due to its contents of flavonoids and 4-hidoxibenzoic acid and benzoic, that promoted animal’s feeding habit, feed conversion ratio and could enhance nutrient digestibility like ash and proteins (Tatli Seven, 2008; Seven et al., 2012; Attia et al., 2014) that reflected on current results of testis size, weight and body condition. Numerous studies showed a beneficial correlation among weight and size of testis, general body health and fertility (Hocking, 1990), the current results concur with Yousef and Salama (2009),Yousef et al. (2010) and El-Metwally et al. (2017).

 

Propolis regarded as a testicular protective agent because it is rich in phenolic and flavonoids contents that protect against oxidative stress and testicular tissues apoptosis by preventing free radicals’ actions on testicular cells proteins, DNA and membranes through raising the potential concentration of Glutathione -S- transferase, Catalase, Superoxide dismutase and Glutathione, which enhance the metabolic functions and subsequently increase testicular size as reported in current results (Yousef and Salama, 2009; Shalaby and Saleh, 2011; Rizk et al., 2014).

 

In addition, the present results revealed that serum protein and globulin elevated significantly due to the ability of porpolis components to improve functions of liver by increasing the generated protein which accompanied with actions of antioxidant agents (Sulaiman et al., 2011). As well as, the changes in our results may be attributed to propolis efficacy to induce immunological proteins synthesis due to high levels of amino acids and flavonoids (Tayeb and Sulaiman, 2014). The current results agree with Galal and his colleagues’s (2008) findings who reported an increment in globulin and protein concentration when broiler fed with 198 and 188 mg/kg of propolis extract. Furthermore, propolis possesses anabolic activity because it has vitamins, essential amino acids and minerals that induce liver proteins production that associated with general health improvement via potential immunostimulatio activity of propolis which increased IgG and IgM levels (Çetin et al., 2010; Shihab and Ali, 2012; Abdel-Rahman and Mosaad, 2013).

 

The statistical analysis of our work recorded significant raise in testosterone level (Table 3), this may be attributed to lignans and phenolic compounds –which are regarded as phytoestrogens— that metabolized in cell into enterolactone and enterodiol, they have estrogen hormone like effects (Branham et al., 2002; Zingue et al., 2017), could be influence donhypothamus and adenohypophesis that lead to produce of LH and FSH which in turn promote gonads to increase testosterone generation and the process of spermatogenesis, respectively (Pineda and Dooley, 2003).

 

The increment in testosterone values in our investigation are required for spermatogenesis and normal seminiferous tubules function that may be attributed to the ability of propolis to increase mRNA expressions of major enzymes is responsible for androgenesis process in testes including 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17ß –HSD), and 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3ß-HSD) (Sharpe et al., 1992; Jana et al., 2006). The current results support by Rizk and his colleagues’s (2014) findings that showed an elevation in testosterone concentration in normal rats injected with extract of propolis that due to an increase in the expression of 17ß-HSD and 3ß-HSD gens. As well as, propolis possesses the ability to improve testicular proteins and 17-ketosteroid reductase (17-KSR) enzyme that are necessary for testosterone synthesis, Shalaby and Saleh (2011) revealed that the application of porpolis could protect DNA from damage and increase LH, testosterone hormone, 17-KSR enzyme and proteins levels due to propolis contents of phenolic acid and flavonoids that prevent and delete the harmful effects of free radicles because it acts as scavenger of free radicles (Baykalir et al., 2016; El-Metwally et al., 2017), consequently increases testicular 17-KSR enzyme level which is required to produce testosterone from androstenedione that leads to high level of testosterone hormone (Shalaby and Saleh, 2011) such found in present results.

 

Several studies established that propolis could enhance semen quantity and quality and spermatogenesis via influencing fertility hormones, as supported by Ghazi et al. (2013) who revealed the augmentation action of propolis on reproductive feature of rats treated with acrylamide agent, as improvement LH, testosterone hormone, FSH and production of sperm (Yousef et al., 2010; ElMazoudy et al., 2011). The present results are agreement with Hussien’s (2011) suggestion who investigated the enhancement actions of propolis on LH, testosterone and FSH in the weaning period of lambs. According to our finding, this work investigated the potential role of propolis at dose 0.250 and 0.5 g/day on general health and the reproductive features of Iraqi local roosters via utilizing physical testicular metrics, as well as, its progressive relationship between propolis dosage and fertility hormones such testosterone hormone, FSH and LH that improving spermatogenesis process and semen characters. In future, several researches required to determine the action of porpolis on general performance and gene expression of liver enzymes of local roosters.

 

Acknowledgments

 

The authors thankful to Dean of agriculture College/ Kerbala University and to the Chairman and all members of Department of Animal production for supporting with all essential requirements for present research.

 

Conflict of Interest

 

This work is personal noncommercial research and there is no conflict of interest.

 

Authors contribution

 

Sura Safi Obayes Khafaji, Thamer Kareem ALjanabi and Salam Merza SuhailAltaie designed the experiment. Salam Merza SuhailAltaie and Thamer Kareem ALjanabi conducted the statistical analysis, as well as, Sura Safi Obayes Khafaji, Salam Merza SuhailAltaie and Thamer Kareem ALjanabi supported the manuscript via conducting the experimental measurement, writing the article and the serious review of article before submission.

 

References

 

• Abdel-Rahman MA, Mosaad GM (2013). Effect of Propolis as Additive on Some Behavioural Patterns, Performance and Blood Parameters in Muscovy Broiler Ducks. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 3:64-68.

• Al-Amoudi WM (2016). Effect of propolis on the reproductive toxicity induced by deltamethrin in male albino rats. African J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 10(4): 44-52. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP2015.4441

• AL-Beitawi N, EL-Ghousein SS (2008). Effect of feeding different levels of Nigella sativa seeds (black cumin) on performance, blood constituents and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7:715-721. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.715.721

• Ali BH, Blunden G (2003). Pharmacological and toxicological properties of Nigella sativa. Phytother. Res. 17: 299- 305. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1309

• Al-Khafaji SS (2013a). Effect of dietary supplementation of crushed seed of Celery (Apiumgraveolens) on Blood traits & Some Immunological parameters of broiler breeder. J. Karbala Uni. 11(4):33-39.

• Al-Khafaji SS (2013b). Effect of dietary supplementation of crushed seed of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum) on Some Physiological & Immunological parameters of broiler. J. Karbala Uni. 11(3):194-201.

• AL-Sirraj MA, Ali RS, Al-Selawy RL, Awad HA, Khdem AA, Mouhsan ZM, Lateef SM (2018). Evaluation of the quality and quantity of some local and imported honey varieties in the Middle Euphrates governorates. J. Kerbala Agric. Sci. Proceedings of the3rdAgricultural Scientific Conference. 5(5):152-165.

• Attia YA, Abd Al-Hamid AE, Ibrahim MS, Al-Harthi MA, Bovera F, Elnaggar ASh (2014). Productive performance, biochemical and hematological traits of broiler chickens supplemented with propolis, bee pollen, and mannan oligosaccharides continuously or intermittently. Livest. Sci. 164: 87-95.

• Aziz MA (1981). Growth promoting agents. In: Handbook of Veterinary Pharmacology, Aziz, M.A. (Ed.) Zagazig University, Pp: 290–295.

• Bankova V (2005). Recent trends and important developments in propolis research. Evidence-based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2: 29–32.

• Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Kadota S (2001a). Recent progress in pharmacological research of propolis. Phytother. Res. 15 (7) (2001) 561–571.ature. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 10 (2): 82-86.

• Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Adnyana IK, Ishii E, Midorikawa K, Matsushige K (2001b). Antiproliferative activity of the Netherlands propolis and its active principles in cancer cell lines. Phytomedicine. 8:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-7113-00004

• Baykalir BG, Seven PT, Gur, S, Seven I (2016). The effects of propolis on sperm quality, reproductive organs and testicular antioxidant status of male rats treated with cyclosporine-A. Anim. Reprod. 13(2):105-111. https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR736

• Branham WS, Siddiqi BS, Bellamy CO (2002). Phytoestrogens and Mycoestrogens Bind to the Rat Uterine Estrogen Receptors. J. Nntr. Cancer. 133: 788-791. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.4.658

• Burdock GA (1998). Review of the biological properties and toxicity of Bee Propolis (Propolis). Food Chem. Toxicol. 36: 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00145-2

• Çetin E, Silici, S, Çetin, N, Güçlü BK (2010). Effects of Diets Containing Different Concentrations of Propolis on Hematological and Immunological Variables in Laying Hens. Poult. Sci. 89: 1703–1708. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00546

• Dobrowolski JW, Vohorab SB, Sharmab K, Shah SA, Naqvi SA, Dandiyab PC (1991). Antibacterial, antifungal, antiamoebic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic studies on propolis bee products. J. Ethnopharmacol. 35: 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(91)90135-Z

• El-Ghamry AA, El-Mallh GM, El-Yamny AT (2002). The effect of incorporating yeast culture, Nigella sativa seeds and fresh garlic in broiler diets on their performance. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 22 (11): 445 – 459.

• Elias A, Franey RJ (1968). Serum cholesterol measurement based on ethanol extraction and ferric chloride sulfuric acid. Clin. Chem. Acta. 2: 225-263.

• ElMazoudy RH, Attia AA, El-Shenawy NS (2011). Protective role of propolis against reproductive toxicity of chlorpyrifos in male rats. Pesticide Biochem. Physiol. 101:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.09.003

• El-Metwally AE, El-Hallawany HA, Ali AH (2017). Immunohistopathologic Study on the Ameliorative Effect of Propolis Against Fluoride Cytotoxicity on Rabbit Buck Fertility. Sciences Vet. J. Alexandria. 53(1): 156-166.

• Galal A, Abd el–Motaal AM, Ahmed AMH, Zaki TG (2008). Productive performance and immune response of laying hens as affected by dietary propolis supplementation. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7: 272–278. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.272.278

• Ghazi AM, Ulaiwi HK, Jary SH (2013). The role of local propolis extract against harmful effects of acrylamide on some male reproductive parameters in rats. AL-Qadisiya J. Vet. Med. Sci. 12(1): 87-95.

• Greenaway J, May T, Scaysbrook D, Whatley F (1991). Identification by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry of 150 Compounds in Propolis. Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX 1 3 RB, U.K.. Z. Naturforsch. 46c, 111- 121. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1991-1-218

• Gunal M, Yayli G, Kaya O, Karahan N, Sulak O (2006). The effects of antibiotic growth promoter ,probiotic or Organic acid Supple- mention on performance intestinal microflora and tissue of broilers . Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5: 149 – 155. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.149.155

• Hassan HMA, Mohamed MA, Youssef AW, ER Hassan (2010). Effect of using organic acids to substitute antibiotic growth promoters on performance. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 23(10): 1348–1353.

• Hocking PM (1990). The relationships between dietary crude protein, body weight, and fertility in naturally mated broiler breeder males. Br. Poult. Sci. 31(4):743-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669008417305

• Hussien HK (2011). Effect of propolis extract on past-weaning LH,FSH and testosterone concentration in Turkish Awassi lambs. J. Anbar. Vet. Sci. 4:219-224.

• Jana K, Jana S, Samanta PK (2006). Effects of chronic exposure to sodium arsenite on hypothalamo–pituitary–testicular activities in adult rats: possible an estrogenic mode of action. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 4: 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-4-9

• Khafaji SS (2018 a). Study the Effect of Ceylon Cinnamon (Cinnamomumzeylanicum) Powder on Some Physiological Parameters in Broiler Chicks. J. Global Pharma. Technol. 10 (07):236-242.

• Khafaji SS (2018 b). Subject Review: Pharmacological Application of Thyme. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 6(9): 366- 371.

• Khafaji SS (2018c). Study the effect of dietary supplementation of crushed seeds of coriander (Coriandrum Sativum) on some physiological parameters of rabbits. Int. J. Res. Pharma. Sci. 9(SPL 1). https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v9iSPL1.1412.

• Meurer F, de Costa MM, de Barros DAD, de Oliveira STL, da Paixa˜o PS (2009). Brown propolis extract in feed as a growth promoter of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linnaeus 1758) fingerlings. Aquac. Res. 40: 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02139.x

• Mishima S, Inoh Y, Narita Y, Ohta S, Sakamoto T, Araki Y, Suzuki KM, Akao Y, Nozawa Y (2005). Identification of caffeoylquinic acid derivatives from Brazilian propolis as constituents involved in induction of granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13: 5814–5818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2005.05.044

• Pineda MH, Dooley MP (2003). McDonald′s Veterinary Endocrinology and Reproduction. (5th ed.). Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.

• Rizk SM, Zaki HF, Mina MA (2014). Propolis Attenuates Doxorubicin-Induced Testicular Toxicity in Rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 67:176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.02.031

• SAS (2001). SAS/STAT Users Guide for Personal Computer. Release 6.18. SAS Institute Inc., New York, USA.

• Seven I, Aksu T, Tatli Seven P (2012). The effects of propolis and vitamin c supplemented feed on performance, nutrient utilization and carcass characteristics in broilers exposed to lead. Livest. Sci. 148: 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.05.001

• Shalaby KA, Saleh EM (2011). Ameliorative Effect of Honey Bee Propolis on the Nonylphenol Induced- Reproductive Toxicity in Male Albino Rats. Australian J. Basic Appl. Sci. 5(11): 918-927.

• Shalaby KA, Saleh EM (2011). Ameliorative Effect of Honey Bee Propolis on the Nonylphenol Induced- Reproductive Toxicity in Male Albino Rats. Australian J. Basic Appl. Sci. 5(11): 918-927, 2011

• Sharpe RM, Maddocks S, Millar M, Saunders PTK, Kerr JB, McKinnell C (1992). Testosterone and spermatogenesis: identification of stage dependent, androgen-regulated proteins secreted by adult rat seminiferous tubules. J. Androl. 13: 172–184.

• Shihab IM, Ali BH (2012). Effect of propolis in diet supplementation on the immune response against Newcastle disease and hematological picture in broiler chicks. Al-Anbar J. Vet. Sci. 5: 40-46.

• Sulaiman GM, Al Sammarrae KW, Ad’hiah AH, Zucchetti M, Frapolli R, Bello E, Erba E, D’Incalci M, Bagnati R (2011). Chemical characterization of Iraqi propolis samples and assessing their antioxidant potentials. Food Chem. Toxicol. 49: 2415–2421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.060

• Tatli Seven P, Seven I, Yilmaz M, Simsek UG (2008) The effects of Turkish propolis on growth and carcass characteristics in broilers under heat stress. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 146: 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.11.003

• Tayeb IT, Sulaiman BF (2014). Effect of propolis supplementation on productive performance in local quail. Iranian J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 4: 621–627.

• Tayeb IT, Sulaiman BF (2014). Effect of propolis supplementation on productive performance in local quail. Iranian J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 4: 621–627.

• Tietz NW (1982). Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. 2nd edition, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.

• Yousef MI, Kamel KI, Hassan MS, El-Morsy AMA (2010). Protective role of propolis against reproductive toxicity of triphenyltin in male rabbits. Food Chem. Toxicol. 48: 1846–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.018

• Yousef MI, Salama AF (2009). Propolis protection from reproductive toxicity caused by aluminium chloride in male rats. Food Chem. Toxic. 47: 1168–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.02.006

• Zingue S, Nde CBM, Michel T, Ndinteh DT, Tchatchou J, Adamou M, Fernandez X, Fohouo FT, Clyne C, Njamen D (2017). Ethanol-extracted Cameroonian propolis exerts estrogenic effects and alleviates hot flushes in ovariectomized Wistar rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 17: 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1568-8