Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Prospects and Risks Related to Potential Transmission of COVID-19 and Other Viruses and Disinfection in Sewage Effluent

PJZ_53_2_743-755

Prospects and Risks Related to Potential Transmission of COVID-19 and Other Viruses and Disinfection in Sewage Effluent

Ayesha Alam1,* and Labeeb Ali2

1College of Food and Agriculture, UAE University, Abu Dhabi

2College of Engineering, UAE University, Abu Dhabi

ABSTRACT

The presence of viruses in treated and untreated sewage water is a serious issue in the agricultural sector as it is highly dependent on recycled water for irrigation purposes due to the shortage of fresh water resources. In this study viruses in untreated and treated wastewater has been reviewed to evaluate the health threats to the people. It has been cited that viruses such as Rotavirus, Norwalk virus, adenovirus, and Hepatitis A virus, are common mediators of the diseases in human beings. Including respiratory disorders, bronchiolitis, digestive tract disorders, pneumonia and conjunctivitis. Additionally, traces of COVID-19 were also found in sewage water sources in some countries like Italy bringing attention towards analysis of sewage water. Based on information from cited literature it is estimated that an individual handling sewage water have approximately 1% chance of becoming infected with virus. Treated sewage effluent and reuse of sewage water for recycle purposes must be considered as it may lead to widespread of COVID 19 in coming decade. Thus, a qualitative risk assessment and disinfection of water supplies based on reported infection rates suggested that viruses in treated and untreated sewage effluents may pose the most risk. This risk assessment and a limited epidemiological evidence suggest that TSE is not harmful for the public places but it cannot be neglected, therefore proper guidelines and policies are required.


Article Information

Received 21 August 2020

Revised 23 November 2020

Accepted 31 December 2020

Available online 26 February 2021

Authors’ Contribution

AA presented the concept, investigated, performed formal analysis and wrote the manuscript. LA visualized, wrote draft, reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Key words

Treated Sewage effluent, Viruses, Sewage water, Urban landscaping, COVID- 19.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20200821130834

* Corresponding author: ayeshaalam4848@gmail.com

0030-9923/2021/0002-0743 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2021 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Introduction

The utilization of sewage effluent is not only dedicated to irrigational purposes but also associated with the economy of the country as it is cost-efficient for water scarcity. This utilization is not only for irrigational purposes but also in various other areas such as industry and urban landscaping or as shown in Table I.

Treated sewage wastewater is quite beneficial for crop growth because of the availability of organic nutrients and it is easily available (Jaramillo and Restrepo, 2017). This sort of re-utilization signifies an alternative approach that is being implemented in different parts of the world facing shortage of water and increasing populations with rising water needs for daily purposes (Winpenny et al., 2013). Particularly assumed the decrease in groundwater reservoirs occurred due to climate change (CC) and climate variability (CV) in different regions of the world. Almost 805 million of population, 1/9th of the world’s population, is affected by hunger explosion because of less availability of domestic crops. There comes a need to facilitate agriculture with cost-effective approaches to manage water scarcity in agriculture purposes for promoting food safety and food security as well as urban landscaping to improve the environment (Corcoran et al., 2010). One of the most important reasons for the reuse of sewage water in the agriculture division is the relative reduction in the pressure of water reservoirs to integrate into regular use. Figure 1 illustrates the mapping of countries that are utilizing treated and untreated sewage effluents for their irrigation purposes (Pimentel et al., 2007).

On contrary, the occurrence of microorganisms in treated and untreated sewage effluents pretenses a phenomenal threat to public health (Rodrigues and Cunha, 2017). Despite of great developments in aqua treatment plants, waterborne pathogens still cause a danger to the public worldwide. According to an investigation, waterborne microorganisms infect almost 0.25 Billion population per year that results in 10±20 million deaths that which is the biggest rate for any of the causalities (Castillo et al., 2015). The types and concentration of dangerous pathogens in the water along with chemical substances may vary from regions to regions as per the socio-economic and sanitary situations imposed by the government nominated rules and regulations (Gerba et al., 2017). For instance, the microbial concentration of parasites, and viruses in sewage water may exceed by 10–1000X in developing countries as compared to the developed countries where there are proper laws and legislations are maintained for each department operated by ministries (Omarova et al., 2018).

Adding to these contamination levels, the occurrence of waterborne sicknesses in the United States of America increased between the years 1971 and 1985 recording more disease outbreaks as compared to any former decade and a half interval since the year 1920 (Craun et al., 2006). Department of USEPA and WHO made inventory of viruses as major contaminant and public health threat mediators (Rachmadi et al., 2020).


 

Utilization Rate of Sewage Water in Middle East

Industrial effluents play a major character in accompanying the water requirement of the Middle East as it has been described only 60% of the produced volume of sewage wastewater up to 10,900 million cubic meters per year was purified in treatment plant (Safwat et al., 2011). Out of this volume of treated sewage water, only 1/ 3rd of the quantity is utilized for agricultural and recreational purposes. The following calculations disclose that almost 80% of the total generated sewage water can hypothetically be re-claimed to deal with water scarcity in different regions of the world (Jasim et al., 2016).

Whereas, Singapore is presently fulfilling 30% of water requirement by recycling its sewage water and targeting to raise the reclaim rate to 55% by the next 30 years (Bennett, 2015). Similarly, in Israel more than 80% of local household sewage wastewater is cleaned and reused. Many countries in the Middle East have implemented important plans. By the next 20 years, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia is aiming to upsurge in the reclamation rate of water by almost 90% of the total quantity of water generation. The rate of water re-utilization in the KSA agriculture subdivision is likely to grow 1.3X in 2035 as compared to the assumed total of 0.54 Billion cubic meters per year in 2012. The analogous increment is also foreseen in the urban landscaping division in which the recycle quantity in 2035 is estimated at 0.56 Billion cubic meter/year, respectively. As far as the United Arab Emirates is concerned, it is Environment Vision 2 targets to reclaim 100% of TSE by the year 2030.

Water-Borne pathogens

Sewage water purifying plants and generated effluent have been recognized as the reproducing place of resistant microbes (Rizzo et al., 2012). The viruses are amongst the significant and possibly perilous of the microorganisms in water reservoirs (Pandey et al., 2014). Human viruses are commonly extra resilient to handling procedures, are infective, and entail lesser dosages to cause disease than many other viral pathogens. Table II illustrates a study in Australia reported by Gibbs and Ho (1993), an infectious dose of different viruses to the cause of incidence when sewage water is exposed to the exposed people.

 

Table I.- Applications of sewage water.

Sector

Application

Reference

Agriculture reuse

Irrigation purposes, industrial crops, seed, processed food, orchards, fodder, commercial nurseries, food crops and livestock

(Jaramillo and Restrepo, 2017; Khan, 2018; Weindl et al., 2015)

Urban

Public urban greenery, Football fields, Institutional playgrounds, residential medians, fireguard utilization, highways horticulture, and golf course

(Bizari and Cardoso, 2016; Ma et al., 2015)

Environmental reuse

Artificial and natural wetlands, augmenting and sustainable stream and river flows

(De Santis, 2011; Butt et al., 2005)

Industrial reuse

Process cooling of broilers and towers

(Xu et al., 2019; Sigh et al., 2012)

 

Table II.- Infectious dose of viruses to the cause of the incidence.

Pathogen

Possibility of disease from disclosure to 1 Organism

Dose to cause the incidence of

1%

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

Enteroviruses

1-10

10-100

100-1000

103-104

Poliovirus 3

3.10×10-2

0.32

Poliovirus 1

1.49×10-2

0.67

Echovirus 1 2

1.70×10-2

0.59

Rotavirus

3.10×10-1

0.03

Norwalk agent

1-10

10-100

100-1000

103-104

Hepatitis A

1-10

10-100

100-1000

103-104

 

These viruses are more problematic to perceive in environment i.e., water and sewage than other microbes such as bacteria and parasites. It is narrated in previous literature that untreated sewage effluent can comprise a wide range of viral pathogens at concentrations of 103± 104 virus particles per liter of water sample (Chahal et al., 2016).

The infectious dose of pathogen depends upon the concentration unit of the microbe such as the infectious units required causing an infection in any host organism (Leggett et al., 2012). For instance, many parasites and viruses generally involve less than 10 infectious cysts to cause an infection in a targeted organism. Variety and nature of the contaminant in effluent waters can find out the ways of pathogen remediation giving an early caution of health-threatening pathogenic concentrations and estimating the risk at all the possibilities of contact between effluent and people involved in handling and surrounding also permitting inspection for influence in proposed pollution by pathogens in the ecosystem (Derx et al., 2016).

Viruses retain at the place wherever the surroundings have been contaminated by sewage or human waste (WHO, 2015). Thus, in natural aquatic habitats, the occurrence of the virus is possibly vulnerable to pollution with exposure or dumping of untreated sewage effluent. Several varieties of human adenovirus have been identified so far, out of which 50 serotypes of viruses are known by the studies (Blyn et al., 2008). The human adenovirus known as (HAdV) has been associated with ailments initiating conjunctivitis (respiratory sickness) and gastroenteritis (gut diseases) as well as affecting immunosuppressed people by chronic infections caused by chronic viruses (Kuo et al., 2010).

Infectious Dose Concentration

The discovery of viruses in water reservoirs is very essential for public health especially in the prevention of disease and in reaction to epidemics. TSE is commonly utilized in public areas especially for irrigation purposes may cause a drastic impact on the ecosystem around, especially people visiting the places. Even though these pathogens are deliberately crucial but still inadequate statistics are available to estimate the occurrence and dissemination in the TSE used in the surroundings. In the case of viruses particularly human adenoviruses are imperative water-borne microorganisms because of their low infection doses which proves that even exposure of small concentrations of virions has the potential to cause infection in the human body (Boehm et al., 2019). Most commonly found human adenoviruses in TSE water samples that have low infection dose are mentioned in Table III.

 

Table III.- Commonly detected enteroviruses in TSE.

Reference

Species of enterovirus

Fong et al. (2010)

Adenovirus 40 41

Murray et al. (2013)

Calicivirus

Zhou et al. (2014)

Calicivirus (astrovirus)

Tiwari and Dhole (2018)

Coxsackievirus

Bisseux et al. (2020)

Echovirus

Baez et al. (2017)

Hepatitis E

Zhou et al. (2016)

Rotavirus

 

Barker et al. (2013) established the QMRA model for estimating the cause of norovirus infection from untreated sewerage water (UTSE) sprayed lettuce leaves. It is usually done in the Australian agriculture sector but unfortunately, it is not endorsed as per the appropriate guidelines set by the ministry. The assessed annual virus statistics showed in between the range from 2.0 ×10-8 and 5.0 ×10-4 provisional on the sewage water resource and most importantly of how systematically the user rinses the vegetable at home before use. This model forecasted the infection loads of around 4.0 ×10-9 and 3.0 ×10-6 rinsing and cleaning with water correspondingly. Consequently, researchers suggested the rinsing of vegetables before eating that imitated upgraded principles in the Australian region.

Similarly, Mok and Hamillton (2014) led experimentation to define the capacity of collected water post irrigation from Asian leafy vegetable farms by sprinkling method with sewage water, respectively. The possibility of disease was calculated as 7.0 ×10-4 and 4.0 ×10-3 for the utilization of two varieties of Chinese cabbage, and 2.0 ×10-3 recorded for lettuce and Chinese broccoli annually. The mean disease load was in the range of 5.0 ×10-6 DALY and 3×10-5 DALY per individual for utilizing Chinese leafy vegetables, correspondingly. This study was the very first demonstration of Asian leafy vegetables in case of water retention measurement also a risk assessment of viral pathogens in leafy vegetables that are irrigated with sewage water in china.

As far as enteric viruses are concerned, limited statistics are available on the presence of human viruses in TSE stated in Table IV.

 

Table IV.- Concentration of enteric viruses in sewage water.

Authors

No. of organisms/ kg

Mean

Range

Llivina et al. (2003)

30

0-60

Goyal et al. (1984)

550

10-5859

Lydholm and Nielsen (1983)

1900

300-4100

Carrington et al. (1991)

200

NS+

Bitton (2005)

810

<0.9- 7500

 

Sewage effluents exposure

The following discussion will concentrate on direct exposure to wastewater as there was not enough published information to quantitatively or qualitatively assess the risks associated with indirect exposure to TSE. It has been proved by various studies proved that the improper biological standard of irrigation water play role in in spreading human viruses. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) added caliciviruses such as norovirus, adenovirus, enterovirus comprising echovirus, polioviruses, and coxsackievirus and particularly HAV in the list of contaminant candidate (CCL4) since 2016 as common microbial pollutants (USEPA, 2018). Additionally, the World Health Organization (WHO) strategies classified HEV, astrovirus, rotavirus, and sapovirus as main microbes for high health hazards evidently (WHO, 2015). The main purpose to review this agenda is to assess the potential health risks related to the usage of treated sewage effluent from sewage water purification plants. TSE from different purifying plants vary depending on wastewater treatment strategy, but here comes a critical aspect for assessing the risks to the exposed people in treatment plants. The risks can be assessed by looking at the following research questions: (i) which groups of people could be at risk from exposure to TSE? and (ii) what alarming densities of pathogens have been found in wastewater for causing disease?

It also focuses on the major route of infection for most enteric viruses i.e., COVID-19 from person to person contact. However, this does not negate the possibility that exposure to TSE may be another potential route of infection.

Urban water risk assessment of living organisms associated with the handling of sewage effluents numerous studies reported pathogen in urban sewage water comprising viral pathogens HAV, Poliviruses, nepavirus, and rotavirus that may directly or indirect infect the handlers and visitors around (Battistone et al., 2014). The individuals at health risk from exposure to wastewater can be distributed into II groups, those who are directly and indirectly exposed to the viruses (Adegoke et al., 2018). The direct exposure holders include treatment plant labors and managers, caretakers of the community using the garden that is irrigated with TSE, farmworkers, and landscaping workers (Dickin et al., 2016). People directly exposed to TSE could ingest pathogens contaminating their hands or clothes. Children are probably most at risk because they are more likely to directly ingest or eat without washing their hands (Biezen et al., 2019). From a literature study conducted in Hevsel Gardens, Turkey was irrigated untreated sewage water which induced the Hepatitis-E infection risk by consuming vegetables and irrigation labors that used untreated sewage effluent were examined out of that around 34.8% were found positive for anti-HEV (Ceylan et al., 2003).

COVID-19 in sewage water and TSE

As the resiliency of environment, the Irrigation Association’s staff and leadership have been working behind the scenes, both advocating on behalf of agricultural and turf-landscape irrigation in public urban green areas to make it COVID 19 free for local visitors around. FAO (2020) department of Land and Water supports planning across the rural, peri-urban, and urban agriculture by providing resources and tools to national and city governments and supply chain actors as they work to provide safe water consumption through water and wastewater treatment, composting of waste, and sustainable land and soil management. FAO Land and Water assists in the resilience of virus-free TSE for irrigational purposes.

Evidences against COVID-19 transmission in SE and TSE

According to the reports by CDC, traditional water treatment techniques that include the use of disinfection and filtration, mostly in municipal water treatment systems must eliminate or deactivate the COVID-19 strains (CDC, 2020a). From recent studies, it is estimated that COVID-19 has been detected in the excreted waste material of patients suffering from COVID-19 which ultimately gets mixed with sewage water and make its way to irrigation reservoirs.

Presently, the diffusion risk of COVID-19 via appropriately intended and sustained sewerage plants is assumed to be quite low. Whereas, scientists have investigated the existing data which proposes that regular individual and municipal purification systems and sewage water management practices must deactivate the virus eventually. Based on all previously published information regarding SARS and MERS, the experts think that there is a quite low threat of infection between individuals through Sewage as Covid-19 does not endure activation for longer periods after being excluded from the human body (AS English, 2020). The Centre for disease control and prevention is revising evidence on COVID-19 spread as soon as it will be available by advanced studies (CDC, 2020a).

Means of COVID-19 transmission from untreated sewage water and TSE

Coronavirus has been identified in untreated wastewater but (CDC, 2020b) it is stated that there is no confirmation about coronavirus can be contracted into a human by coming into contact with it. The possibility of becoming infected via the feces of a COVID-19 carrier is also remote - there have been no confirmed reports of this occurring. However, it is added that coronavirus may be transferred via feces to oral consumption. It is confirmed that RNA virus has been identified within the stool of infected patient and eventually researchers observed that few patients who suffered from COVID-19 initially infected by diarrhea instead of any fever and the concluding this incidence as common afterward (WEF, 2020). This indicates the presence of novel coronavirus persistence into the sewage water and can infect patients via feces oral route.

Reuters (2020) published in Al-Arabiya published the detected traces of coronavirus in sewage effluent in Italy during December 2019 which suggests that COVID-19 was previously existing in Italy before Wuhan reported its first coronavirus case. This report was published as a result of the Italian National Institute of Health observed 40 different sewage water samples taken from sewage treatment plants in Italy from October 2019 till February 2020, respectively. Similar studies directed by scientific crews in Australia, Netherlands, and France have identified that coronavirus can be spotted in TSE, and various states are starting to use sewage samples to track the outbreak of the infection. Similarly, it is also considered that the occurrence of the virus in the sewage samples of Italy doesn’t indicate inevitably that the key reason for the spreading of the epidemic was initiated from the initial integration of coronavirus in the sewage sample (La Rosa, 2020). The survival of coronaviruses in water prompted labs around the country to begin using sewage monitoring as a means of tracking COVID-19. Although infectious droplets may contaminate water and the virus has been detected in wastewater, experts agree that when it gets into large bodies of water, like lakes, rivers, and oceans, the concentration of the virus would be so diluted that it would be difficult to contract it (Needles, 2020).

Wastewater could prove to be a vital resource if future outbreaks occur (Sims and Kasprzyk-Hordern, 2020). A one-month study in Paris was able to gauge the rise and fall in reported coronavirus cases in the French capital during the lockdown. In Eau de Paris, according to a virologist, Sébastien Wurtzer elucidated at public water service of the city, that “the higher the concentration of virus in wastewater the higher the number of infected people: “This visibility is also going to help us predict the future waves of outbreaks,” (Lesserre, 2020).

Identification and disinfection of sewage water from viruses

For the prevention of health issues and corrosion of ecological systems, the sewage water used in the alternate method should satisfy the following quality standards that will examine the physical, chemical, and biological quality of water before utilization (Khalid et al., 2018). In this cause, various quality parameters are applied in different regions of the world (Ceylan et al., 2003). Some of the quality parameters that must be taken in to account for the utilization of sewage effluent for irrigational purposes are mentioned below in Table V.

Uzen (2017) reported some limitations in the utilization of sewage water for irrigation purposes where there are chances of its direct contact with the people around. As turf irrigation and recreational parks irrigation is now totally mechanical in which water sprinklers and waterjets are accommodated for irrigation purposes

 

Table V.- Quality standards for the classification of sewage water for irrigation purpose (Uzen, 2017).

Quality parameter

Class of quality (highest to least quality)

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th

E C25 × 106

250

250- 750

750- 2000

2000-3000

More than 3000

Exchangeable Na %

Less than 20

20- 40

40- 60

60- 80

More than 80

Adsorption rate of Sodium (SAR)

Less than 10

10- 18

18- 26

Greater than 26

-

Residual (Na2 CO3)

<66 meq L-1, mg L-1

66- 133 meq L-1, mg L-1

>133 meq L-1, mg L-1

-

-

Chlorides

0- 142 meq L-1, mg L-1

192-249 meq L-1, mg L-1

249-426 meq L-1, mg L-1

426-710 meq L-1, mg L-1

>710 meq L-1, mg L-1

Sulphates

0-192 meq L-1, mg L-1

192-336 meq L-1, mg L-1

336-575 meq L-1, mg L-1

575-960 meq L-1, mg L-1

>960 meq L-1, mg L-1

Total Solids Dissolved

0-175 mg L-1

175- 525 mg L-1

525- 1400 mg L-1

1400- 2100 mg L-1

>2100 mg L-1

Boron (B)

0-0.5 mg L-1

0.5-1.12 mg L-1

1.12-2.0 mg L-1

More than 2.0 mg L-1

-

Water class

C1 S1

C1 S2

C2 S2

C2 S1

C1 S3, C3 S4, C2 S3, C3 S3, C3 S1

C4S3, C4S2, C1S4, C2S4, C4S1, C3S4, C4S4

-

Nitrogen NH4+ / NO3-

0-5 mg L-1

5-10 mg L-1

10-30 mg L-1

30-50 mg L-1

Greater than 50 mg L-1

Coliform of Feces 1/100ml

0-2ml

1-20ml

20- 100ml

100- 1000ml

>1000ml

BOI5

0- 25 mg L-1

25- 50 mg L-1

50- 100 mg L-1

100- 200 mg L-1

More than 200 mg L-1

Solids particles (Suspended)

20 mg L-1

30 mg L-1

45 mg L-1

60 mg L-1

More than 100 mg L-1

-log of H (pH)

6.5- 8.5

6.5- 8.5

6.5- 8.5

6.5- 9

<6 and >9

Temp (C)

30 C

30 C

35 C

40 C

More than 40 C

 

around the roads, parks, and urban landscape areas in homes as well. This is because the agricultural areas and surrounded vegetation are done at a large scale where these technologies supported water sprinklers can reduce the labor and irrigation is done in proper ways. The limitations of sprinkling sewage water for irrigation in public places, gardens, and orchards must follow the following limitations (Table VI).

Identification of viruses in sewage water resources typically includes viral strains concentration out of big volumes of a sample followed by identification techniques such as microbial culture in appropriate host cells, scanning electron microscopic technique and immunological performances. Disinfection as the las barrier in wastewater treatment plays a critical role in removing those enteric viruses (Okoh et al., 2010).

 

Table VI.- Limitations for irrigation with sewage water (Uzen, 2017).

Agricultural species

Limitations

Viti culture and orchards

No irrigation with sprinkler

Prohibited consumption of fallen fruit

Fecal coliform must not exceed 1000/l00 ml

Seed and Fiber production

sprinkler allowed

chlorinated and biologically clean sewage water can be used through a sprinkler

No of Fecal coliform must not exceed

1000/l00 ml

Forage and oil crops, floriculture, raw inedible flora

surface irrigation, mechanically treated wastewater

 

Risk assessment model

Pachepsky et al. (2011) stated a quantifiable pathogenic risk assessment model to evaluate the threat of infection because of ingestion of generated irrigated pathogens contained water. This model is basically comprised of two phases: a) exposure model and b) infectivity model. Exposure model in 6 stages. First phase estimate whether pathogens are immune enough to pass through all stages and remain active to cause infection if ingested. Second phase in which Infectious dose of pathogen is transmitted form source to the host and chance of infection is evaluated. The major factor to assess in second model is the time and probability of illness to happen. Time is usually about the persistence of microbe throughout the process and its activation towards infection causing whereas probability of disease occurrence is about immunity of the host who is ingesting that microbe in activated form. Figure 2 is illustrating the steps.


 

Indicator pathogen method

Quality standard for biological water is an indicator microbe that may be not pathogenic but is supposed to correlate with other existing pathogens in the water, therefore enabling assessment of the probability that possible pathogens are present in the sample or not (Korajkic et al., 2018). There are plenty of microbes that have been projected and confirmed as indicators for detection, while only a fewer of these have been implemented in standard procedures.

CT value method

To justify the importance for water sterilization, engineers are applying disinfection strength, which is defined as a CT value product of concentration of disinfectant and time of contact (mg x min/L) treating against viral pathogens in sewage water samples. As per reported by Rachmadi et al. (2020) sterilization of water sample was conducted against echovirus and Coxsackie B. Results depicted high CT values which means lesser susceptibility as 4-log10 deactivation as compared to Norovirus and Adenovirus with free chlorine usage. Similarly, adenovirus showed lesser susceptibility towards mono chloramine as compared to that of coxsackie and norovirus, respectively. Virus type, water temperature, pH and water matrices really affect the CT value (Rachmadi et al., 2020). Conversely, according to guidelines of WHO there are multiple barrier system for health hazard managing in sewage water recycling and re utilization for irrigational purposes. There are certain criteria set forward for concertation of viruses in water based on the acceptable loss of disability-adjusted life years known as (DALYs) /individual. Yr, reduction of virus by 2- to 3-log10 to 6- to 7-log10 is compulsory in the recycled water for treated and untreated irrigation resources, correspondingly (Ito et al., 2017). Gerba et al. (2017) suggested further 2- to 3-log10 elimination of viral pathogens in water samples to confirm the protection of reclaimed water for irrigational purposes. The last barrier in sterilization treatment is typically disinfection procedure. Sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), ozone (O3), and acetic acid (CH3COOH) are normally consumed as disinfectants in sewage treatment plants especially in developed regions like West and Europe (Brandão et al., 2013). Amongst existing sterilization agents, the free chlorine and mono chloramine are mostly utilized disinfection agents because of cost effectiveness and efficacy for the eradication of microbes, in spite of having narrow contact surface area in the incident that groups of viruses are made and there are certain scavengers in sample water i.e., organic matter simultaneously (Collivignarelli et al., 2017).

Advance oxidation process (AOP)

Ozone (O3) based advanced oxidation process (AOP) may suggest an innovative clarification to treat microbes present in sewage effluents (Uslu et al., 2015). Numerous researches have emphasized that traditional water cleaning techniques that depend on basic microbial treatments and chlorination are quite unsuccessful in eradicating hazardous pathogens such as viruses. Major drawback of chlorination is formation of chlorinated disinfecting agents as by-products (Wang et al., 2015) for instance Halogenic acetic acids (HAAs) and Trihalomethanes (THMs) which are extremely carcinogenic for the humans. Another approach is alternative oxidants which is known as ozone and ozone-hydrogen peroxide AOP which is one of the most proficient solutions that may significantly decrease the risk sat by microorganisms of evolving concerns within treated sewage effluent (TSE) (Wang et al., 2015).

QMRA assessment

One of the most famous approach for viral risk assessment is quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) which usually rely upon to create mandatory treatment levels that should be useful to sufficiently diminish infection problem related with contact with pathogens in TSE. General protocol to determine the level of water treatment needed to make a TSE supply adequately harmless for a specific type of risk includes an appropriate degree of danger, identifying expected exposure levels, and choosing proper dose response function that associates exposure towards risk of infection (Stanford et al., 2015). This approach is highly promising for viral pathogens found in water because of their dose-response relationships. Water quality standards monitoring viral pathogens, comprising human deadly viruses and coliphages, have been established previously. Although these approaches deliver information only on viability of virus, they are normally less promising to detect viruses because of their lesser concentrations in sewage and TSE. An alternate method is using assays that are based on nucleic acid of virus (Crank et al., 2019). A proper sequencing of virus is done and traces are detected from the water sample after PCR and sequences are matched by molecular markers.

Conclusion

This review recommends the further investigations of irrigation resources to ensure the crop quality and public health. Utilization of sewage effluent water (TSE), as a substitute approach of irrigation purpose, is an accredited policy for the proficient usage and inhibition of ecological and aquatic contamination that is acquiring increased application throughout the world, particularly in regions where water is scarce. However, there are some risks connected that should be evaluated against some indigenous guidelines, taking TSE irrigation of public places and crops which are frequently handled and visited by people around. There is an absence of quantifiable assessment of microbial risk, may lead to suspecting the concentration of COVID 19 RNA virus in TSE, is the missing piece in the puzzle that is mandatory for the appropriate application in agricultural reutilization of sewage water. It is suspected that improper handling of sewage water and direct exposure of TSE to the public and environment can lead to the future wave of pandemic which may prove to be the catastrophe in history of viral outbreaks.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interests.

References

Adegoke, A.A., Amoah, I.D. and Stenstrom, T.A.V., 2018. Epidemiological evidence and health risks associated with agricultural reuse of partially treated and untreated wastewater: A review. Front. Publ. Hlth., 6: 337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00337

Afzal, A., Chelme-Ayala, P., Drzewicz, P., Martin, J.W. and Gamal El-Din, M., 2015. Effects of ozone and ozone/hydrogen peroxide on the degradation of model and real oil-sands-process-affected-water naphthenic acids. Ozone: Sci. Engin., 37: 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2014.967835

Allison Needles, 2020. Testing sewers for COVID-19 can help predict future outbreak: Tacoma News Tribune. In: The News Tribune. https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article242041431.html (Accessed on 28 May, 2020).

Arvai, A., Klecka, G., Jasim, S., Melcer, H. and Laitta, M.T., 2013. Protecting our Great Lakes: Assessing the effectiveness of wastewater treatments for the removal of chemicals of emerging concern. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada, 49: 23–31. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrjc.2013.104

AS English, 2020. Coronavirus: can Covid-19 be spread through water? - AS.com. https://en.as.com/en/2020/05/01/other_sports/1588336370_175415.html (Accessed on 28 May, 2020).

Baez, P.A., Lopez, M.C., Duque-Jaramillo, A., Pelaez, D., Molina, F., and Navas, M.C., 2017. First evidence of the Hepatitis E virus in environmental waters in Colombia. PLoS One, 12: e0177525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177525

Barker, S.F., O’Toole, J., Sinclair, M.I., Leder, K., Malawaraarachchi, M. and Hamilton, A.J., 2013. A probabilistic model of norovirus disease burden associated with greywater irrigation of home-produced lettuce in Melbourne, Australia. Water Res., 47: 1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.012

Battistone, A., Buttinelli, G., Fiore, S., Amato, C., Bonomo, P., Patti, A.M., Vulcano, A., Barbi, M., Binda, S., Pellegrinelli, L., Tanzi, M.L., Affanni, P., Castiglia, P., Germinario, C., Mercurio, P., Cicala, A., Triassi, M., Pennino, F. and Fiore, L., 2014. Sporadic isolation of Sabin-like polioviruses and high-level detection of non-polio enteroviruses during sewage surveillance in seven Italian cities, after several years of inactivated poliovirus vaccination. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 80: 4491–4501. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00108-14

Becerra-Castro, C., Lopes, A.R., Vaz-Moreira, I., Silva, E.F., Manaia, C.M. and Nunes, O.C., 2015. Wastewater reuse in irrigation: A microbiological perspective on implications in soil fertility and human and environmental health. Environ. Int., 75: 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.001

Bennett, A., 2015. Developments in desalination and water reuse. Filtrat. Separat., 52: 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-1882(15)30181-6

Biezen, R., Grando, D., Mazza, D. and Brijnath, B., 2019. Visibility and transmission: Complexities around promoting hand hygiene in young children - A qualitative study. BMC Publ. Hlth., 19: 398. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6729-x

Bisseux, M., Didier, D., Audrey, M., Christine, A., Hélène, P.L., Jean-Luc, B. and Cécile, H., 2020. Monitoring of enterovirus diversity in wastewater by ultra-deep sequencing: An effective complementary tool for clinical enterovirus surveillance. Water Res., 169: 115246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115246

Bitton, G., 2005. Wastewater microbiology (Wiley series in ecological and applied microbiology) by Gabriel Bitton. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471717967

Bizari, D.R. and Cardoso, J.C., 2016. Água de reuso e horticultura urbana: Aliança para a criação de cidades mais sustentáveis. Horticul. Brasil., 34: 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362016003002

Blyn, L.B., Hall, T.A., Libby, B., Ranken, R., Sampath, R., Rudnick, K., Moradi, E., Desai, A., Metzgar, D., Russell, K.L., Freed, N.E., Balansay, M., Broderick, M.P., Osuna, M.A., Hofstadler, S.A. and Ecker, D.J., 2008. Rapid detection and molecular serotyping of adenovirus by use of PCR followed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. clin. Microbiol., 46: 644–651. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00801-07

Boehm, A.B., Graham, K.E. and Jennings, W.C., 2018. Can we swim yet? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and risk assessment of aging sewage in surface waters. Environ. Sci. Technol., 52: 9634–9645. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01948

Boehm, A.B., Silverman, A.I., Schriewer, A. and Goodwin, K., 2019. Systematic review and meta-analysis of decay rates of waterborne mammalian viruses and coliphages in surface waters. Water Res., 164: 114898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114898

Borikar, D., Mohseni, M. and Jasim, S., 2015. Evaluation and comparison of conventional and advanced oxidation processes for the removal of PPCPs and EDCs and their effect on THM-formation potentials. Ozone: Sci. Engin., 37: 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2014.940028

Brandao, D.N., Scherrenberg, S.M. and Lier, J.V.B., 2013. Recalamation of used urban waters for irrigation purposes-A review of treatment technologies. J. environ. Manage., 122: 85-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.012

Butt, M.S., Sharif, K., Bajwa, B.E. and Aziz, A., 2005. Hazardous effects of sewage water on the environment: Focus on heavy metals and chemical composition of soil and vegetables. Manage. environ. Quality: An Int. J., 16: 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830510601217

Carrington, E.G., Pike, E.B., Auty, D. and Morris, R., 1991. Destruction of faecal bacteria, enteroviruses and ova of parasites in wastewater sludge by aerobic thermophilic and anaerobic mesophilic digestion. Water Sci. Technol., 24: 377-380. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1991.0094

Castillo, F.Y.R., Muro, A.L., Jacques, M., Garneau, P., Gonzalez, F.J.A., Harel, J. and Barrera, A.L.G., 2015. Waterborne pathogens: Detection methods and challenges. Pathogens, 4: 307-334. https://doi:10.3390/pathogens4020307

CDC, 2020a. Information for sanitation and wastewater workers on COVID-19. CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/sanitation-wastewater-workers.html (Accessed on 6 June, 2020).

CDC, 2020b. Water and COVID-19 FAQs. National Center of Immunization and Respiratory Disease, CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/water.html (Accessed on 6 June, 2020)

Ceylan, A., Ertem, M., Ilcin, E. and Ozekinci, T., 2003. A special risk group for hepatitis E infection: Turkish agricultural workers who use untreated waste water for irrigation. Epidemiol. Infect., 131: 753–756. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268803008719

Chahal, C., van den Akker, B., Young, F., Franco, C., Blackbeard, J. and Monis, P., 2016. Pathogen and particle associations in wastewater: Significance and implications for treatment and disinfection processes. Adv. appl. Microbiol., 97: 63–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aambs.2016.08.001

Collivignarelli, M., Abbà, A., Benigna, I., Sorlini, S. and Torretta, V., 2017. Overview of the main disinfection processes for wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Sustainability, 10: 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010086

Corcoran, E., Nellemann, C., Baker, E., Bos, R., Osborn, D. and Savelli, H., 2010. Sick water? The central role of wastewater management in sustainable development a rapid response assessment. https://gridarendal-website-live.s3.amazonaws.com/production/documents/:s_document/208/original/SickWater_screen.pdf?1486721310 (Accessed on 7 June 2020).

Crank, K., Petersen, S. and Bibby, K., 2019. Quantitative microbial risk assessment of swimming in sewage impacted waters using CrAssphage and Pepper mild mottle virus in a customizable model. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 6: 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00468

Craun, M.F., Craun, G.F., Calderon, R.L., Beach, M.J. and Craun Michael F Craun, G.F., 2006. Waterborne outbreaks reported in the United States. J. Water Hlth., 4: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2006.016

de Santis, A., 2011. Status and prospects for Lorentz and CPT violation tests at KLOE and KLOE-2. Proceedings of the 5th Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry, CPT 2010, 1294: 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814327688_0018

Derx, J., Schijven, J., Sommer, R., Zoufal-Hruza, C.M., van Driezum, I.H., Reischer, G., Ixenmaier, S., Kirschner, A., Frick, C., de Roda Husman, A.M., Farnleitner, A.H. and Blaschke, A.P., 2016. QMRAcatch: Human-associated fecal pollution and infection risk modeling for a river/floodplain environment. J. environ. Qual., 45: 1205–1214. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.11.0560

Dickin, S.K., Schuster-Wallace, C.J., Qadir, M. and Pizzacalla, K., 2016. A review of health risks and pathways for exposure to wastewater Use in Agriculture. Environ. Hlth. Perspect., 124: 900–909. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509995

FAO, 2020. The FAO Land and Water response to COVID-19. Land and Water. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/land-water/overview/covid19/en/ (Accessed on 7 June, 2020).

Fong, T.T., Phanikumar, M.S., Xagoraraki, I. and Rose, J.B., 2010. Quantitative detection of human adenoviruses in wastewater and combined sewer overflows influencing a Michigan river. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 76: 715–723. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01316-09

Gerba, C.P., Betancourt, W.Q. and Kitajima, M., 2017. How much reduction of virus is needed for recycled water: A continuous changing need for assessment? Water Res., 108: 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.020

Gibbs, R. and Ho, G., 1993. Health risks from pathogens in sewage: Implications for Australian sludge management guidelines. Water, 20: 17–22.

Goyal, S.M., Schaub, S.A., Wellings, F.M., Berman, D., Glass, J.S., Hurst, C.J., Brashear, D.A., Sorber, C.A., Moore, B.E., Bitton, G., Gibbs, P.H. and Farrah, S.R., 1984. Round robin investigation of methods for recovering human enteric viruses from sludge. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 48: 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.48.3.531-538.1984

Ito, T., Kitajima, M., Kato, T., Ishii, S., Segawa, T., Okabe, S. and Sano, D., 2017. Target virus log10 reduction values determined for two reclaimed wastewater irrigation scenarios in Japan based on tolerable annual disease burden. Water Res., 125: 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.057

Jaramillo, M.F. and Restrepo, I., 2017. Wastewater reuse in agriculture: A review about its limitations and benefits. Sustainability, 9: 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101734

Jasim, S.Y., Saththasivam, J., Loganathan, K., Ogunbiyi, O.O. and Sarp, S., 2016. Reuse of treated sewage effluent (TSE) in Qatar. J. Water Process Engin., 11: 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.05.003

Jiang, S.C., 2006. Human adenoviruses in water: Occurrence and health implications: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40: 7132–7140. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060892o

Khalid, S., Shahid, M., Natasha, Bibi, I., Sarwar, T., Shah, A.H. and Niazi, N.K., 2018. A review of environmental contamination and health risk assessment of wastewater use for crop irrigation with a focus on low and high-income countries. Int. J. environ. Res. Publ. Hlth., 15: 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050895

Khan, N., 2018. Natural ecological remediation and reuse of sewage water in agriculture and its effects on plant health. InTech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75455

Korajkic, A., McMinn, B.R. and Harwood, V.J., 2018. Relationships between microbial indicators and pathogens in recreational water settings. Int. J. environ. Res. Publ. Hlth., 15: 2842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122842

Kuo, D.H.W., Simmons, F.J., Blair, S., Hart, E., Rose, J.B. and Xagoraraki, I., 2010. Assessment of human adenovirus removal in a full-scale membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Water Res., 44: 1520–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.039

La Rosa, G., 2020. Coronavirus was already in Italy by December, waste water study finds - BBC News. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53106444 (Accessed on 7 June, 2020).

Leggett, H.C., Cornwallis, C.K. and West, S.A., 2012. Mechanisms of pathogenesis, infective dose and virulence in human parasites. PLoS Pathog., 8: e1002512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002512

Lesserre, C., 2020. Coronavirus found in Paris sewage points to early warning system. Science, 368: 6489. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc3799

Llivina, L.M., Muniesa, M., Vale, H.P., Lucena, F. and Jofre, J., 2003. Survival of bacterial indicator species and bacteriophages after thermal treatment of sludge and sewage. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 69: 1452-1456. https://doi.org10.1128/AEM.69.3.1452–1456.2003

Lupo, A., Coyne, S. and Berendonk, T.U., 2012. Origin and evolution of antibiotic resistance: The common mechanisms of emergence and spread in water bodies. Front. Microbiol., 3: 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00018

Lydholm, B. and Nielsen, A., 1983. Effect of aerobic and anaerobic sludge stabilization on the content of indigenous viruses. Waste Manage. Res., 1: 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X8300100127

Ma, X.C., Xue, X., González-Mejía, A., Garland, J. and Cashdollar, J., 2015. Sustainable water systems for the city of tomorrow-A conceptual framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7: 12071–12105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912071

Mocé-Llivina, L., Muniesa, M., Pimenta-Vale, H., Lucena, F. and Jofre, J., 2003. Survival of bacterial indicator species and bacteriophages after thermal treatment of sludge and sewage. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 69: 1452–1456. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.3.1452-1456.2003

Mok, H.F., Barker, S.F. and Hamilton, A.J., 2014. A probabilistic quantitative microbial risk assessment model of norovirus disease burden from wastewater irrigation of vegetables in Shepparton, Australia. Water Res., 54: 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.060

Murray, T.Y., Mans, J. and Taylor, M.B., 2013. Human calicivirus diversity in wastewater in South Africa. J. appl. Microbiol., 114: 1843–1853. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12167

Norton-Brandão, D., Scherrenberg, S.M. and van Lier, J.B., 2013. Reclamation of used urban waters for irrigation purposes - A review of treatment technologies. J. environ. Manage., 122: 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.012

Okoh, A.I., Sibanda, T. and Gusha, S.S., 2010. Inadequately treated wastewater as a source of human enteric viruses in the environment. Int. J. environ. Res. Publ. Hlth., 7: 2620–2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7062620

Omarova, A., Tussupova, K., Berndtsson, R., Kalishev, M. and Sharapatova, K., 2018. Protozoan parasites in drinking water: A system approach for improved water, sanitation and hygiene in developing countries. Int. J. environ. Res. Publ. Hlth., 15: 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030495

Pachepsky, Y., Shelton, D.R., Mclain, J.E.T., Patel, J. and Mandrell, R.E., 2011. Irrigation waters as a source of pathogenic microorganisms in produce. Adv. Agron., 113: 73–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386473-4.00002-6

Pandey, P.K., Kass, P.H., Soupir, M.L., Biswas, S. and Singh, V.P., 2014. Contamination of water resources by pathogenic bacteria. AMB Express, 4: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-014-0051-x

Park, K.Y., Choi, S.Y., Lee, S.H., Kweon, J.H. and Song, J.H., 2016. Comparison of formation of disinfection by-products by chlorination and ozonation of wastewater effluents and their toxicity to Daphnia magna. Environ. Pollut., 215: 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.001

Pimentel, D., Berger, B., Filiberto, D., Newton, M., Wolfe, B., Karabinakis, E., Clark, S., Poon, E., Abbett, E. and Nandagopal, S., 2007. Water resources: Agricultural and environmental issues. In: Food, energy and society, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis, UK. pp. 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420046687.ch14

Rachmadi, A.T., Kitajima, M., Kato, T., Kato, H., Okabe, S. and Sano, D., 2020. Required chlorination doses to fulfill the credit value for disinfection of enteric viruses in water: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol., 54: 2068–2077. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01685

Ramírez-Castillo, F.Y., Loera-Muro, A., Jacques, M., Garneau, P., Avelar-González, F.J., Harel, J. and Guerrero-Barrera, A.L., 2015. Waterborne pathogens: Detection methods and challenges. Pathogens, 4: 307–334. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4020307

Reuters, M., 2020. Coronavirus: Traces of COVID-19 found in Italy’s sewage water from December 2019. Al Arabiya English. https://english.alarabiya.net/en/coronavirus/2020/06/19/Coronavirus-Traces-of-COVID-19-found-in-Italy-s-sewage-water-from-December-2019 (Accessed on 7 June, 2020).

Rizzo, L., Fiorentino, A. and Anselmo, A., 2012. Effect of solar radiation on multidrug resistant E. coli strains and antibiotic mixture photodegradation in wastewater polluted stream. Sci. Total Environ., 427: 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.062

Rodrigues, C. and Cunha, M.Â., 2017. Assessment of the microbiological quality of recreational waters: indicators and methods. Euro-Mediterr. J. environ. Integr., 2: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-017-0035-8

Rodríguez-Lázaro, D., Cook, N., Ruggeri, F.M., Sellwood, J., Nasser, A., Nascimento, M.S. J., D’Agostino, M., Santos, R., Saiz, J.C., Rzezutka, A., Bosch, A., Gironés, R., Carducci, A., Muscillo, M., Kovač, K., Diez-Valcarce, M., Vantarakis, A., von Bonsdorff, C.H., de Roda Husman, A.M., Hernandaz, M. and van der Poel, W.H.M., 2012. Virus hazards from food, water and other contaminated environments. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 36: 786–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00306.x

Safwat, F.T. and Abdel-Dayem, R.C.A., 2011. Water reuse in the Arab World. From principle to practise (Issue May) (Accessed on 7 June, 2020).

Sims, N. and Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., 2020. Future perspectives of wastewater-based epidemiology: Monitoring infectious disease spread and resistance to the community level. Environ. Int., 139: 105689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105689

Singh, R., Verma, R. and Yadav, Y., 2012. Use of industrial waste water for agricultural purpose: Pb and Cd in vegetables in Bikaner City, India. Curr. World Environ., 7: 287–292. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.7.2.14

Smeets, P.W.M.H., Medema, G.J. and van Dijk, J.C., 2008. The Dutch secret: Safe drinking water without chlorine in the Netherlands. Drink. Water Engin. Sci. Discuss., 1: 173–212. https://doi.org/10.5194/dwesd-1-173-2008

Stanwell-Smith, R., 2003. Classification of water-related disease. Water Hlth., 1: 1–24.

Tiwari, S. and Dhole, T.N., 2018. Assessment of enteroviruses from sewage water and clinical samples during eradication phase of polio in North India. Virol. J., 15: 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1075-7

USEPA, 2018. Public comments for national drinking water advisory council (NDWAC) Meeting on December 11 and 12, 2013. http://www.epa.gov/dclead/WA_rack_6_Aug06.pdf (Acessed om 7 June 2020).

Uslu, M., Seth, R., Jasim, S., Tabe, S. and Biswas, N., 2015. Reaction kinetics of ozone with selected pharmaceuticals and their removal potential from a secondary treated municipal wastewater effluent in the Great Lakes Basin. Ozone: Sci. Engin., 37: 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2014.929520

Uzen, N., 2017. Use of wastewater for agricultural irrigation and infectious diseases. Diyarbakir example use of wastewater for agricultural irrigation and infectious diseases . Diyarbakir example. J. environ. Protect. Ecol., 17: 488–497.

Stanford, B., Walker, T., Khan, S., Synder, S. and Robillot, C., 2015. Critical control point in DPR: Quantifying the multi-barrier approach to treatment. In: 88th Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition and Conference, WEFTEC. pp. 5477-5488. https://doi.org/10.2175/193864715819540810

Wang, H., Jia, P., Ding, N., Pang, G. and Wang, N., 2015. Photocatalytical deactivation of pathogens for municipal wastewater reusing. Water Air Soil Pollut., 226: 333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2619-8

WEF, 2020. Current priority: Coronavirus Index. Water Environment Federation. https://wef.org/coronavirus (Accessed 8 June, 2020).

Weindl, I., Lotze-Campen, H., Popp, A., Müller, C., Havlík, P., Herrero, M., Schmitz, C. and Rolinski, S., Weindl, I., Lotze-Campen, H., Popp, A., Müller, C., Havlík, P., Herrero, M., Schmitz, C. and Rolinski, S., 2015. Livestock in a changing climate: production system transitions as an adaptation strategy for agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett., 10: 094021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094021

WHO, 2015. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, fourth edition. WHO.

Winpenny, J., Heinz, I., Koo-Oshima, S., Salgot, M., Collado, J., Hérnandez, F. and Torricelli, R., 2013. Reutilización del agua y agricultura: Beneficios para todos? FAO, Rome, Italy.

Xu, R., Wu, Y., Wang, G., Zhang, X., Wu, W. and Xu, Z., 2019. Evaluation of industrial water use efficiency considering pollutant discharge in China. PLoS One, 14: e0221363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221363

Zhang, Y. and Pagilla, K.R., 2013. Gas-phase ozone oxidation of hydrogen sulfide for odor treatment in water reclamation plants. Ozone: Sci. Engin., 35: 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2013.796861

Zhou, N., Lin, X., Wang, S., Wang, H., Li, W., Tao, Z. and Xu, A., 2014. Environmental surveillance for human astrovirus in Shandong Province, China in 2013. Scient. Rep., 4: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07539

Zhou, N., Lv, D., Wang, S., Lin, X., Bi, Z., Wang, H., Wang, P., Zhang, H., Tao, Z., Hou, P., Song, Y. and Xu, A., 2016. Continuous detection and genetic diversity of human rotavirus A in sewage in eastern China, 2013-2014. Virol. J., 13: 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-016-0609-0

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

June

Vol. 53, Iss. 3, Pages 801-1200

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe