Join Us  |   Site Map
Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Non-Monotonic Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Bisphenol-A on Vitellogenin Expression in Juvenile Freshwater Cyprinid, Catla catla

PJZ_49_4_1531-1534

 

 

Non-Monotonic Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Bisphenol-A on Vitellogenin Expression in Juvenile Freshwater Cyprinid, Catla catla

Mehwish Faheem1,*, Saba Khaliq2 and Khalid Parvez Lone2

1Department of Zoology, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan

2Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals e.g. bisphenol-A can alter fish reproduction. Vitellogenin (vtg) is the egg yolk precursor and used as a biomarker for estrogenic endocrine disruption. To elucidate the endocrine-disrupting effect of bisphenol-A, juvenile Catla catla was exposed to graded concentrations of bisphenol-A (10,100,1000μg/l) for 14 days. BPA exposure strongly elevates vtg mRNA level in fish exposed to 100μg/l but at 1000 μg/l exposure of BPA, vtg level decreased compared to 100µg/l exposed fish. These results showed that BPA has estrogenic action and cause endocrine disruption in juvenile C. catla at environmentally relevant concentration. Moreover, these results also depict the non-monotonic, biphasic dose response to BPA.


Article Information

Received 19 October 2016

Revised 28 November 2016

Accepted 24 December 2016

Available online 10 July 2017

Authors’ Contributions

MF carried out the experiment and prepared the manuscript under supervision of SK and KPL.

Key words

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), Bisphenol-A (BPA), Catla catla, Vitellogenin.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.4.sc9

* Corresponding author: mehwishfaheem@gcu.edu.pk; mehwish_faheem@hotmail.com

0030-9923/2017/0004-1531 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2017 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Many chemicals released into the environment have the potential to disturb the endocrine system of organisms (Diamanti-Kandarakis et al., 2009). These chemicals are termed as endocrine-disturbing chemicals (EDCs) and can interfere with synthesis, release, circulation and metabolism of endogenous hormones which in turn lead to reproductive abnormalities. Because water bodies tend to contain a variety of EDCs from agricultural, municipal and industrial discharge, fish inhabiting such aquatic environments are exposed to all waterborne contaminants during brief periods or for entire lifespans, and are therefore considered more vulnerable to these EDCs (Eggen et al., 2003; Goksøyr, 2006).

Vitellogenin induction is used as a biomarker in assessing endocrine disruption in aquatic environment, particularly by estrogenic compounds (Matozzo et al., 2008). Vitellogenin (vtg) is a precursor of egg-yolk protein, synthesized in liver of female fish under influence of endogenous estrogen (Thomas-Jones et al., 2003). Male and juvenile fish also has vtg gene but is not expressed due to the absence of substantial levels of circulating estrogens (Harries et al., 1997). Therefore, induction of vtg mRNA in male and juvenile fish is considered as biomarker of endocrine disruption by environmental estrogens (Sumpter and Jobling, 1995; Kime, 1999).

Bisphenol-A (BPA) is an estrogenic endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC) that gained much attention over the past decade. It is commercially important and widely used chemical (Vandenberg, 2014). It is a monomer used in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins which in turn are used to make a large variety of plastic products including lining of food beverage containers (Staples et al., 1998, 2002). BPA is ubiquitous in aquatic environment and a number of reproductive and developmental effects have been reported in fish (reviewed in Bhandari et al., 2015).

Large number of studies reported estrogenic effects of BPA in fish, but to the best of our knowledge, no study is present concerning the effects of BPA on Catla catla. In this respect, a dose-response study was performed in order to determine the estrogenic potential of BPA and to establish the threshold for BPA induction of vtg in C. catla. In the present study, the estrogenic potential of BPA was determined by measuring mRNA expression of vtg in liver of juvenile C. catla.

 

Materials and methods

Juvenile Catla catla were purchased from a commercial fish farm located at suburbs of Lahore, Pakistan. Fish were acclimatized in cement ponds for two weeks under natural photoperiods. After acclimatization, fish were divided into four groups (10 fish per group). Three groups were exposed to graded concentration (10, 100, 1000µg/l) of BPA for 14 days, and the fourth group was vehicle control. BPA stock solution was prepared in ethanol and control group was exposed to maximum level of ethanol used for BPA dilutions. A fresh toxicant solution was added every other day after renewal of 75 % water. Experiments and fish handling was performed according to OECD guidelines for fish toxicity (OECD, 1992). After 14 days, fish was anesthetized with clove oil and length and weight of fish measured. Fish were humanly sacrificed, liver was removed and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 0C.

For insolating RNA tissue samples were ground in liquid nitrogen and total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of tissue using Trizol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Quantity and quality of RNA was checked using nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and ethidium bromide stained agarose gel respectively. Total RNA (1µg) was reverse transcribed with oligo-dT primers using Revert aid MMLV cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo-scientific). cDNA was diluted 1:10 for use in qRT-PCR.

Primers were designed using Primer3plus software. Primer sequence, annealing temperature and product size are listed in Table I. Validation of primer specificity was performed by conventional PCR and electrophoresing the PCR product on agarose gel to confirm a single band with the desired product size. Real-time PCR was performed using CFX 96 (Bio-Rad) with Syber green fluorescent label. In order to ensure amplification specificity, the melt curve of the PCR product was evaluated by heating from 60°C to 95 °C at the end of each reaction.

Ct value generated by software (CFX Manager Software, Version 3.1) at the end was used for further analysis. Baseline and threshold values were automatically set by the software. The Ct values for each of the gene were transformed into relative expression using the 2-ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

Data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean. Data were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test using IBM SPSS (Version: 20) to examine the effects of BPA exposure on vtg mRNA expression relative to the control group. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Geometric mean of three most stable reference genes should be used as a reference control to accurately estimate mRNA transcript abundance (Vandesompele et al., 2002). Mean of three most stable reference genes, gapdh, tbp, and 18S was used as internal control as described by Faheem et al. Unpublished.

 

Results and discussion

No mortality was observed during 14 day period in any treatment groups. Fold change in vtg concentration exposed to 10, 100 and 1000µg/l BPA is shown in Figure 1. vtg mRNA expression increased in fish liver exposed to 10, 100 and 1000μg/l BPA. At 100µg/l vtg expression increased many thousand folds compared to control, whereas at 1000 μg/l, vtg expression increased only 6 fold compared to control group. It appears from these results that 100µg/l is the optimum dose for vtg induction in juvenile C. catla in our experimental conditions.

Vitellogenin is a female-specific protein synthesized in the liver, transported through the blood to growing oocytes and accumulated in yolky eggs as a food reserve for embryos and early larval stages of fish. The analysis of vtg mRNA expression in the liver is a promising approach to monitoring estrogenic exposure (Bowman et al., 2000; Scholz et al., 2004). In particular, levels of mRNA rise rapidly after vtg gene induction, revealing recent exposure to

 

 

Table I.- Primer sequences, amplicon lengths and annealing temperature of selected genes.

Genes

Primer sequence 5’to 3’

Amplicon size

Annealing temperature (oC)

gapdh

ATCA-CAGCCACGCAGAAGACC CAGGAATGACTTTGCCCACAGC

126

60

18S

CGGTGAACCTTGGTGACTCT CT TGGATGTGGTAGCCGTTT

189

60

tbp

AACAGCTTGTCCCTCCTGGA TCCAGGAGGGACAAGCTGTT

213

60

vtg

GTTGCTCTCCAGACCTTTGC GCAGAGCCTCCACCTTGTAG

180

60

estrogenic pollutants with elevated sensitivity (Bowman et al., 2000; Craft et al., 2004; Scholz et al., 2004) and it is one of the most studied estrogen-dependent processes in the reproduction of oviparous species.

In the present study, the levels of vtg mRNA altered in juvenile fish exposed to 10, 100 and 1000μg/l BPA for 14 days. However, the increase was only statistically significant in100 µg/l treated fish. Significant increase in vtg level was reported in liver of juvenile Atlantic salmon exposed to BPA, 25 and 125 mg/kg body weight (Arukwe et al., 2000). Exposure of 50 μg/l of BPA for 21 days cause significant induction of vtg in Atlantic cod (Larsen et al., 2006). Similarly, BPA induced significant increase in vtg level of both male and female fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) exposed at concentrations of 160 and 640µg/l (Sohoni et al., 2001).

Induction of vtg at 10, 100 and 1000 μg/l BPA observed in the present study also suggests estrogenic activity of BPA at environmentally relevant concentrations. Other studies have shown vtg induction in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Dose dependent increase was observed in liver vtg mRNA level of male Oryzias sinensis exposed to BPA for six days in a range of 0.02 to 2 mg/l (Lee et al., 2007). vtg level increased significantly in common carp exposed to range of BPA (1,10,100,1000μg/l) for 14 days (Mandich et al., 2007) and a significant increase in medaka exposed to 1000μg/l of BPA for 21 days (Ishibashi et al., 2005). In rainbow trout exposure of 500μg/l of BPA for 12 days resulted in significant induction of vtg (Lindholst et al., 2000). All these studies reported that BPA is capable of vtg induction; however difference among studies can be due to difference in fish species used as model, species-specific estrogen receptor binding, water temperature and exposure time (Lindholst et al., 2000; Crain et al., 2007).

Mandich et al. (2007) reported dose dependent increase of vitellogenin in male and female Cyprinus carpio exposed for 14 days to gradient concentrations of BPA (1-1000µg/l). Our results are interesting as we observed the optimum increase in mRNA expression of vtg at 100 µg/l of BPA exposure, while at 1000µg/l of BPA increase in vtg mRNA expression is not significant compared to control. This means that BPA becomes less effective and toxic at concentrations above 100 µg/l. This is sometimes referred as a biphasic response. Our results at higher dose of BPA are contradictory to the findings of Mandich et al. (2007) who reported an increase of vitellogenin in cyprinus carpio exposed to 1000 µg/l. Recent studies from Zhang et al. (2016) showed similar inverted U-shaped response of BPA in rare minnow. BPA exposure of 1 and 15 µg/l significantly up-regulated vtg levels (1.09 and 1.13 folds, respectively) while BPA exposure at 225 µg/l causes down-regulation of vtg level. Virk et al. (2014) reported that common carp, a species related to C. catla, exposed to 100 µg/l of BPA had significantly higher plasma concentration of vitellogenin, while fish exposed to 1000µg/l BPA has lower plasma vitellogenin concentration. BPA showed inverted U-shaped kinetics regarding vitellogenin levels in common carp (Virk et al., 2014) which is also observed in the present study. Down-regulation of vtg observed at higher dose of BPA is due to the fact that at higher doses BPA become toxic to liver cells. In an earlier study, we evaluated the histopathological effects of BPA and found that 1000µg/l BPA exposure caused degenerative effects in liver and other vital organs of juvenile C.catla (Faheem et al., 2016a). NIEHS expert panel in 2007 also concluded that BPA can produce non-monotonic dose response curves (vom Saal et al., 2007). Vandenberg (2014) reported that non-monotonic dose-response curves are common with BPA and around 24% of in-vitro experiments with BPA showed non-monotonic response. In vivo studies with rodents also support the notion that BPA produce non-monotonic, biphasic responses (Xu et al., 2010; Jenkins et al., 2011; Angle et al., 2013).

 

Conclusion

Bisphenol-A exerts an estrogenic action and at environmentally relevant concentrations can induce vtg synthesis that cause potential harm to fish reproduction.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this paper.

 

References

Angle, B.M., Do, R.P., Ponzi, D., Stahlhut, R.W., Drury, B.E., Nagel, S.C., Welshons, W.V., Besch-Williford, C.L., Palanza, P., Parmigiani, S., vom Saal. F.S. and Taylor, J.A., 2013. Reprod. Toxicol., 42: 256-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.07.017

Arukwe, A., Celius, T., Walther, B. T. and Goksøyr, A., 2000. Aquat. Toxicol., 49: 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00083-1

Bowman, C.J., Kroll, K.J., Hemmer, M.J., Folmar, L.C. and Denslow, N.D., 2000. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., 120: 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1006/gcen.2000.7565

Bhandari, R.K., Deem, S.L., Holliday, D.K., Jandegian, C.M., Kassotis, C.D., Nagel, S.C., Tillitt, D.E., vom Saal, F.S. and Rosenfeld, C.S., 2015. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., 214: 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.09.014

Crain, D.A., Eriksen, M., Iguchi, T., Jobling, S., Laufer, H., LeBlanc, G.A. and Guillette Jr., L.J., 2007. Reprod. Toxicol., 24: 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.05.008

Craft, J.A., Brown, M., Dempsey, K., Francey, J., Kirby, M., Scott, A.P., Katsiadaki, I., Robinson, C.D., Davies, I.M., Bradac, P. and Moffat, C.F., 2004. Mar. Environ. Res., 58: 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2004.03.025

Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Bourguignon, J.P., Giudice, L.C., Hauser, R., Prins, G.S., Soto, A.M., Zoeller, R.T. and Gore, A.C., 2009. Endocr. Rev., 30: 293–342. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2009-0002

Eggen, R.I.L., Bengtsson, B.E., Bowmer, C.T., Gerritsen, A.A.M., Gibert, M., Hylland, K., Johnson, A.C., Leonards, P., Nakari, T., Norrgren, L., Sumpter, J.P., Suter, M.J.F., Svenson, A. and Pickering, A.D., 2003. Pure appl. Chem., 75: 2445–2450. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375112445

Faheem, M., Jahan, N. and Lone, K.P., 2016a. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 26: 514-522.

Goksøyr, A., 2006. J. Toxicol. environ. Hlth. A. 69: 175–184.

Harries, J.E., Sheahan, D.A. and Jobling, S., 1997. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 16: 534-541. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160320

Ishibashi, H., Watanabe, N., Matsumura, N., Hirano, M., Nagao, Y., Shiratsuchi, H., Kohra, S., Yoshihara, S. and Arizono, K., 2005. Life Sci., 77: 2643-2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2005.03.025

Jenkins, S., Wang, J., Eltoum, I., Desmond, R. and Lamartiniere, C.A., 2011. Environ. Hlth. Perspect, 119: 1604-1609. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103850

Kang, I., Yokota, H., Oshima, Y., Tsuruda, Y., Oe, T., Imada, N., Tadokoro, H. and Honjo, T., 2002. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 21: 2394–2400. https://doi.org/10.1897/1551-5028(2002)021<2394:EOBAOT>2.0.CO;2

Kime, D.E., 1999. Sci. Total Environ., 225: 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00328-3

Larsen, B.K., Bjornstad, A., Sundt, R.C., Taban, I.C., Pampanin, D.M. and Andersen, O.K., 2006. Aquat. Toxicol., 78: 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.02.026

Livak, K.J. and Schmittgen, T.D., 2001. Methods, 25: 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262

Lindholst, C., Pedersen, K.L. and Pedersen, S.N., 2000. Aquat. Toxicol., 48: 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00051-X

Lee, C., Park, M., Kim, H.M., Kim, H.J. and Choi, K., 2007. Mol. cell. Toxicol., 3: 185-189.

Matozzo, V., Gagne, F., Marin, M. G., Ricciardi, F. and Blaise, C., 2008. Environ. Int., 34: 531-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.09.008

Mandich, A., Bottero, S., Benfenati, E., Cevasco, A., Erratico, C., Maggioni, S., Massari, A., Pedemonte, F. and Viganò, L., 2007. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., 153: 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.01.004

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1992. Fish acute toxicity test. Test Guideline 203. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Paris, France.

Scholz, S., Kordes, C. and Hamann, J., 2004. Mar. Environ. Res., 57: 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1136(03)00082-5

Sohoni, P., Tyler, C.R., Hurd, K., Caunter, J., Hetheridge, M., Williams, T., Woods, C., Evans, M., Toy, R., Gargas, M. and Sumpter, J.P., 2001. Environ. Sci. Technol., 35: 2917–2925. https://doi.org/10.1021/es000198n

Staples, C.A., Dorn, P.B., Klecka, G.M., O’Block, S.T. and Harris, L.R., 1998. Chemosphere, 36: 2149–2173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10056-X

Staples, C.A., Woodburn, K., Caspers, N., Hall, A.T. and Klecka, G.M., 2002. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 8: 1083-1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1080-700291905837

Sumpter, J.P. and Jobling, S., 1995. Environ. Hlth. Perspect., 103 (Suppl 7): 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.95103s7173

Thomas-Jones, E., Thorpe, K., Harrison, N., Thomas, G., Morris, C., Hutchinson, T., Woodhead, S. and Tyler, C., 2003. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 22: 3001–3008. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620220506

Vandenberg, L.N., 2014. Dose-Response, 12: 259–276. https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.13-020.Vandenberg

Virk, P., Ali, A., Al-Sakran, M. and Elobeid, M.A., 2014. Trop. J. pharm. Res., 13: 1107-1112. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v13i7.14

Vandesompele, J., Preter, D.K., Pattyn, F., Poppe, B., Roy, V.N., Paepe, D.A. and Speleman, F., 2002. Genome Biol., 3: 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034

vom Saal, F.S., Akingbemi, B.T., Belcher, S.M., Birnbaum, L.S., Crain, D.A, Eriksen, M., Farabollini, F., Guillette, L.J. Jr., Hauser, R., Heindel, J.J., Ho, S.M., Hunt, P.A., Iguchi, T., Jobling, S., Kanno, J., Keri, R.A., Knudsen, K.E., Laufer, H., LeBlanc, G.A., Marcus, M., McLachlan, J.A., Myers, J.P., Nadal, A., Newbold, R.R., Olea, N., Prins, G.S., Richter, C.A., Rubin, B.S., Sonnenschein, C., Soto, A.M., Talsness, C.E., Vandenbergh, J.G., Vandenberg, L.N., Walser-Kuntz, D.R., Watson, C.S., Welshons, W.V., Wetherill, Y. and Zoeller, R.T., 2007. Reprod. Toxicol., 24: 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.005

Xu, X.H., Zhang, J., Wang, Y.M., Ye, Y.P. and Luo, Q.Q., 2010. Horm. Behav., 58: 326-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.02.012

Zhang, Y., Tao, S., Yuan, C., Liu, Y. and Wang, Z., 2016. Chemosphere, 144: 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.083

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology (Associated Journals)

October

Vol. 49, Iss. 5, Pages 1547-1936

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe

Commons Attribution License

This license permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Creative Commons License
Follow ResearchersLinks