Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Host Plant Selection Affects Biological Parameters in Armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

PJZ_51_6_2117-2123

 

 

Host Plant Selection Affects Biological Parameters in Armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Asad Abdullah, Muhammad Irfan Ullah*, Abu Bakar Muhammad Raza, Muhammad Arshad and Muhammad Afzal

Department of Entomology, University of Sargodha, 40100, Sargodha

ABSTRACT

Armyworm, Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) is considered as one of the economically important insect pest in global agriculture. Suitability of host plants is critical for the efficient management of this economically important insect pest. We studied the effect of various host plants on the growth, development and fecundity of S. litura. The larvae of S. litura were offered leaves of cabbage, alfalfa, sesbania and, maize in comparison to artificial diet under laboratory conditions (32±05 oC; 65±05 RH). The larval suitability was found maximum on cabbage followed by sesbania, alfalfa and minimum on maize. The larval length and weight were found higher on cabbage followed by alfalfa and sesbania. Similarly, the pupal development was minimum in respect to days on maize than others. The adults lived 11 days more on cabbage compared to other diets. Female life span was found higher than male on all diets provided. Adult emergence rate was high in cabbage (93.11%), followed by alfalfa (87.5%), sesbania (81.33%), and maize (68.44%). Fecundity was higher when fed on leaves of cabbage, alfalfa and sesbania as compared to maize and artificial diet. Number of eggs oviposited were highest on cabbage (2455.5 eggs) followed by alfalfa (1750.0 eggs) and lowest on maize (1055.6 eggs). More egg batches were found on alfalfa and sesbania. All of the biological parameters of S. litura included in the study were affected by the host plants.


Article Information

Received 07 January 2019

Revised 12 March 2019

Accepted 10 April 2019

Available online 14 August 2019

Authors’ Contribution

AA and MIU conceived and designed

the study and wrote the manuscript. ABMR and MA analyzed the data and reviewed the literature. MA critically reviewed the manuscript and interpreted the results. This work is a part of PhD thesis of AA.

Key words

Armyworm, artificial diet, growth and development, host preference, host suitability

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.6.2117.2123

* Corresponding author: muhammad.irfanullah@uos.edu.pk

0030-9923/2019/0006-2117 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2019 Zoological Society of Pakistan



INTRODUCTION

Armyworm, also known as common cutworm, Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has achieved the significant position as a destructive insect pest in cotton growing areas of Pakistan (Saeed et al., 2010; Ahmad et al., 2007). It has a wide range of hosts from about 25 genera and 14 families including fodder crops, economically important cash crops, vegetables, weeds, various horticultural and ornamentals plants (Simpson et al., 2002; Raubenheimer and Simpson, 2003; Lee et al., 2003; Ahmad et al., 2013). This pest has a vigorous migratory ability (Fu et al., 2015) and is widely distributed throughout the tropical and temperate climatic conditions (Tenywa et al., 2018). This pest cause damage in the form of monstrous patches from one to another host plant, causing inconsiderable economic losses (Tuan et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2006). S. litura damage the host plants by feeding leaves, brackets, newly emerged seedlings, tender shoots and fresh seed kernels (Yinghua et al., 2017).

Both species, Spodoptera exigua, Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and S. litura are economically to their high reproductive rate and heavy losses. Due to the absence of common hosts, S. litura may select the grasses for the reproduction and survival. Although it has been a sporadic pest of cotton in Pakistan for many years, it is becoming gradually a very important insect pest of various agricultural crops due Due to the absence of common hosts, S. litura may select the grasses for the reproduction and survival. Although it has been a sporadic pest of cotton in Pakistan for many years, it is becoming gradually a very important insect pest of fodder crops in recent years (Ahmad et al., 2008). The common cultivated fodder crops, mostly affected by the S. litura are corn, Zea maize L. (family: poaceae), alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (family: fabaceae), barseem, Trifolium alexandrinum L. (family: fabaceae) (Khan et al., 2011; Ahmad et al., 2013). Alfalfa, being a perennial crop is mostly affected by the S. litura as alternate host (Kaur, 2012; Agrell et al., 2003).

S. litura not only reduce the quality of various crops but also lower the quantity. S. litura damage the immature cobs of maize at milking stage by making galleries (Naz et al., 2003). Same trend is observed in cabbage flower due to which fungus develops and stunting in growth occurs (Bhatia and Gupta, 2003). This pest has 1-2 generations on sesbania and completely destroys the plant leaves (Ghaffar et al., 2002).

Number of studies have reported S. litura selection of various host plants and mode of damage under different environmental conditions in India (Christou et al., 2006; Xue et al., 2010), Pakistan (Ahmad et al., 2007; Chaudhry et al., 2017) and China (Kaur, 2012; Zhu et al., 2000, 2005; Qin et al., 2004), including other Asian countries. From the last many years, it is reported that this pest has established high immunity against the large groups of pesticides (Saleem et al., 2008; Nathan and Kalaivani, 2005; Sang et al., 2013) and also have minute range of susceptibility for the non-conventional growing crops (Wan et al., 2008). Due to the resistance, S. litura can survive from the area where application of pesticides carried out (Kaur et al., 2014).

In this study, we determined the oviposition preferences, development and survival of larval and pupal stages of S. litura on the different host plants (cabbage, alfalfa, sesbania and maize) to determine its host preferences.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Test insects

Larvae of S. litura were collected from farmer fields from Muzaffargarh (29.5069° N, 70.8536° E) and Sargodha district (32.0740° N, 72.6861° E) and were brought into the laboratory of department of Entomology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha. Artificial diet was prepared from wheat germ based according to the method described by Sorour et al. (2011). The artificial diet contained 90 g of wheat flour, methyle-hydroxy benzoate (2g), streptomycin (0.25g), yeast (10g), vitamin C (2 capsule), wheat flour (90g), ascorbic acid (3g) and sorbic acid (3g). Flour was sterilized for 30 min before using. Diet was provided daily up to the pupation stage for the homogenous and less resistant population. Pupae were collected on the daily basis and kept in separate rearing cage for the adult emergence. Adults were released in separate rearing transparent cages (2x2 ft square) provided with moist cotton and honey solution (9:1%) to feed the adults. Towel paper strips were provided for egg laying. The strips having egg batches were replaced daily and eggs per batch were recorded under the microscope, (OPTIKA-SZM2, Italy). Standard rearing conditions of 27±2°C, 65±05% RH with 16:8 lights to dark ratio were followed (Ahmad et al., 2007; Arif et al., 2009; Gupta et al., 2005). The F3 generation of reared culture of S. litura was used in this study.

Host plants

Four host plants were used in this study including common name jantar/sesban (Sesbania sesban (L.), lucern/alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), maize (Zea maize L.) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.). These plant species were planted in research area at College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha. No pesticides were applied in the field. Fresh leaves of each host were collected to feed the S. litura. The leaves were first washed with distilled water and then dried at room temperature prior to feeding the larvae.

Development of S. litura

Newly hatched larvae were reared on artificial diet. Second instar larvae were used in the experiment. Larvae were starved for 24 h prior to experimentation. The experimental arena was a petri dish containing 1 larva/plate. There were three replications with 5 larvae in each replication. The data for larval length and weight were recorded daily using measuring scale and digital weight balance. After pupal formation, the pupal weight and length was recorded. Adult emergence ratio was also determined to check the effect of host plant.

Fecundity of S. litura

For each treatment, three pairs of adults were separated and released into clean cages separately. The towel paper was hanged to facilitate the egg laying, number of egg batches and total number of eggs were recorded daily. The honey solution was provided as discussed above.

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test the significance of host plants on the developmental biology, and fecundity of S. litura, by keeping host plant as main factors. Means were separated by Tukey HSD all pairwise comparison test. All the analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 software.

 

RESULTS

Overall, larval development was significantly affected by the host plants (P<0.05) and was longest on cabbage (8.86 days) followed by alfalfa (8.00 days) and shortest on maize (7.00 days). Maximum larval length was found on cabbage (3.74 cm), followed by alfalfa (3.54 cm) and minimum on maize (2.93 cm). In case of larval weight, similar trend was found. However, the pupal development was also affected significantly (P<0.05) by hosts. Pupal developmental period was longest on artificial diet (17.00 days), followed by maize (13.66 days) and the shortest on cabbage (9.66 days). Pupal length was also significantly different (P<0.001) by host and was longer 2.05 cm on cabbage, followed by 1.93 cm on artificial diet and shortest 1.34 cm on maize. Pupal weight was significantly different by host and was found heaviest (0.089 g) in cabbage treatment and was the lightest (0.034 g) on maize (Table I).

 

Table I.- Effect of host plants on larvae and pupal development of Spodoptera litura.

Larval development

Pupal development

Diets

Length (cm)

Weight (g)

Period (No. of days)

Length (cm)

Weight (g)

Period (No. of days)

Cabbage

3.74±0.11a

0.69±0.03a

8.86±0.35a

2.05±0.06a

0.089±0.01a

9.66±0.37d

Alfalfa

3.54±0.18ab

0.61±0.04ab

8.00±0.37ab

1.83±0.05b

0.067±0.00b

11.26±0.40cd

Sesbania

3.48±0.08ab

0.54±0.03bc

7.46±0.32ab

1.61±0.05bc

0.065±0.00b

11.66±0.37c

Maize

2.93±0.24b

0.42±0.02cd

7.00±0.39b

1.34±0.11c

0.034±0.00c

13.66±0.49b

Artificial

3.11±0.15ab

0.33±0.02d

7.4±0.40b

1.93±0.42a

0.036±0.00c

17.00±0.60a

F-value

3.921

23.603

3.811

15.801

526

37.703

P-value

<0.05

<0.001

<0.05

<0.001

<0.05

<0.05

The means±SE in the same column followed by same letters are not significantly different at P > 0.05.

 

Number of egg masses and total eggs oviposited by S. litura females on host plants differed significantly (egg masses: F = 174.0; df = 4, 74; P < 0.001; total eggs: F = 348.0; df = 4, 74; P < 0.001). S. litura oviposited greater and almost the similar number of egg masses (21-22.6) on alfalfa and sesbania compared to other treatments.

The lowest number of egg masses (9.3) were found on maize. However, the total number of eggs laid by three females were found greater on cabbage (7366.7) followed by 5250.0 on alfalfa and the lowest 2316.0 on artificial diet (Fig. 1).


 

Adult emergence rate was also significantly affected (F = 28.41 and P > 0.001) by host plants and was maximum on cabbage (93.11%±6.73) followed by alfalfa (87.5%±4.61). While minimum adult emergence percentage 68.44%±2.59 was found on maize (Fig. 2).

There was a significant difference in male (F=26.1 and P>0.00) and female (F=12.1 and P>0.00) adult life span feeding on different host plants. Female adults lived more days compared to male feeding on hosts. However, the adult life span was more; 10±0.29 days for female and 8.80±0.34 days for male followed by alfalfa and sesbania when were fed on cabbage leaves compared to other hosts. The shortest period of both male (4.6±0.31 days) and female (6.6±0.42 days) adults were observed when they fed on maize (Fig. 3). The host suitability was found maximum on cabbage, Alfaalfa and least on artificial diet (Fig. 4).


 

DISCUSSION

The current study results show that larval food directly affects the pupal size and weight and duration as well adult life span on all four host plants. The results are in line to Xue et al. (2010) and Ahmad et al. (2013), they reported that the food directly affects the larval and pupal developmental period along with length and weight of larvae and pupae. Their findings depicted that during the larval feeding activity, specific storage proteins play an important role in fecundity and metamorphosis of insects. Few work has been reported that focused on the process of protein storage at larval and pupal stages (Telang et al., 2002). Our results showed that S. litura preferred the cabbage, lucern (alfalfa) and jantar (sesbania) leaves in comparison to maize and artificial diet, these results supported by Wakil et al. (2011) and Maung (2016). Current study results are in line with Zhu et al. (2000); Chen et al. (2002), Seema et al. (2004) and Courdon et al. (2002) they stated that due to the variation in nutritional values, larval weight and developmental period may differ. Differences in pupal survival, adult sex ratio, longevity, and fecundity may also be affected by temperature and other environmental conditions (Zhu et al., 2000; Chen et al., 2002; Seema et al., 2004).


 

Similarly, the adult emergence ratio was higher on cabbage leaves than other diets and the adult life span was also higher in this treatment. The results about female longevity and the number of eggs laid is also in accordance to Mabrouk et al. (2001) and El-Awady et al. (2009) who reported that S. litura laid maximum number of eggs feeding on cabbage leaves. Selection of the suitable host plants for feeding help the insects to maintain the population up to several generations and multiplication (Lee et al., 2003). The information about the host plants for insect pest development led to the useful implementation for the integrated pest management (IPM) tool (Greenberg et al., 2001; Saeed et al., 2009; Rezapanah et al., 2008). To understand the insect behavior and for the management tools this basic nutritional ecology can enhance our appreciation of insects’ adaptation to new food resources. The destruction ability of S. litura for host plants represented by the fitness of the pest (Tuan et al., 2015). The fitness can be determined with the help of pest life table, because life table provides complete and inclusive exposure about the pest developmental stage, reproduction of new progeny and its existence (Jha et al., 2012). Integrated pest management program can be established by the life tables as an important ecology-based implementing tool (Tuan et al., 2014; Ahmad et al., 2018). Under the different laboratory circumstances for the life history facts, S. litura was reared on diverse host plant materials reported by Xue et al. (2010) and Shahout et al. (2011). To understand the effect of host plants diversity on the ecosystem of pest is very essential for the population management strategies (Greenberg et al., 2001).


 

Cabbage crop is a potentially good candidate trap crop for oviposition by the S. litura. However, the effectiveness of trap crops depends on the relative attractiveness of the plant species (Badenes-Perez et al., 2004), the proportion of the field occupied by the trap crop (Banks and Ekbom, 1999), duration of the trapping effect (Cook et al., 2007), insect migratory and host-finding behaviors (Shelton and Badenes-Perez, 2006), and the relative planting times of trap crops. Trap crops at the field edge can prevent the pest from reaching the crop (Rea et al., 2002). The use of trap cropping in agriculture is not well established because this approach is more knowledge-intensive than is pesticide use. However, in least developed countries, pesticides can represent an unacceptable extra cost (Khan et al., 2001; Gurr et al., 2017) and generally lead to many environmental problems.

The results of our study will be helpful to determine the population dynamics and preferences for various biological parameters in different host regimes and ultimately will aid in developing the suitable management practices for the control of this notorious pest.

 

CONCLUSION

These findings of this study will be useful in understanding the biology of S. litura that could be utilized in various management protocols including integrated pest management (IPM)

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The research work is the part of PhD study of first author and is funded by UOS funded project.

 

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

References

Agrell, J., Oleszek, W., Stochmal, A., Olsen, M. and Anderson, P., 2003. Herbivore-induced responses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). J. chem. Ecol., 29: 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022625810395

Ahmad, M. Arif, M.I. and Ahmad, M., 2007. Occurrence of insecticide resistance in field populations of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Crop Protec., 26: 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.07.006

Ahmad, M., Ghaffar, A., Rafiq, M. and Ali, P.M., 2013. Host plants of leaf worm, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: noctuidae) in Pakistan. Asian J. Agric. Biol., 1: 23-28.

Ahmad, M., Sayyed, A.H., Saleem, M.A. and Ahmad, M., 2008. Evidence for field evolved resistance to newer insecticides in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Pakistan. Crop Protec., 27: 1367-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2008.05.003

Ahmad, J.N., Mushtaq, R., Ahmad, S.J.N., Maqsood, S., Ahuja, I. and Bones, A.M., 2018. Molecular identification and pathological characteristics of NPV Isolated from Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., 50: 2229-2237.

Arif, M.I., Rafiq, M. and Ghaffar, A., 2009. Host plants of cotton mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace to cotton agroecosystem of Punjab. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11: 163-167.

Badenes-Perez, F.R., Shelton, A.M. and Nault, B.A., 2004. Evaluating trap crops for diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. econ. Ent., 97:1365–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/97.4.1365

Bhatia, R. and Gupta, D., 2003. Insect and mite pest status of subtropical horticultural crops in Himachal Pradesh. J. Insect Sci., 16: 1-8.

Banks, J.E. and Ekbom, B., 1999. Modelling herbivore movement and colonization: pest management potential of intercropping and trap cropping. Agric. For. Ent,. 1:165-170. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-9563.1999.00022.x

Chaudhry, H.R., Sattar, M.M.K., Ahmad, H. and Shehzad, F., 2017. Fodder production, a module for extension workers. The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321106875_Fodder_Production [accessed Oct 16 2018].

Chen, Q.J, Yang, J.Q., Zhang, J.Z., Zhang, Y.Z. and Chen, J.H., 2002. Effect of temperature on laboratory population of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in tobacco fields. Tobbaco Sci. Technol., 2: 42-45.

Christou, P., Capell, T., Kohli, A., Gatehouse, J.A. and Gatehouse, A.M., 2006. Recent developments and future prospects in insect pest control in transgenic crops. Trends Pl. Sci., 11: 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.04.001

Cook, S.M., Khan, Z.R. and Pickett, J.A., 2007. The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu. Rev. Ent., 52: 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407

Courdon, T.A., Wittmeyer, J. and Kim, Y., 2002. Life history and cost analysis for continuous rearing of Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on a zoophytophagous artificial diet. J. econ. Ent., 95: 1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.6.1159

El-Awady, S.M., Ali, F.A.F., Abdel-Sattar, M.M. and Hafez, S.S., 2009. Comparative study for some biological aspects of the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) reared on castor bean leaves and artificial diets. J. agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 34(4): 3913-3917.

Fu, X.W., Zhao, X.Y., Xie, B.T., Ali, A. and Wu, K.M., 2015. Seasonal pattern of Spodoptera litura L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) migration across the Bohai strait in Northern ChinaJ. econ. Ent., 108: 525-538. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov019

Ghaffar, A., Attique, M.B., Naveed, M.R. and Jan, M.T., 2002. Host range and population dynamics of beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, in cotton agro ecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., 34: 209-213.

Greenberg, S.M., Sappington, T.W., Legaspi, B.C., Liu, T.X. and Setamou, M., 2001. Feeding and life history of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants. Annls. ent. Soc. Am., 94: 566-575. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0566:FALHOS]2.0.CO;2

Gupta, G.P., Rani, S., Birah, A. and Raghuraman, M., 2005. Improved artificial diet for mass rearing of the tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci., 25: 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1079/IJT200551

Gurr, G.M., Wratten, S.D., Landis, D.A. and You, M., 2017. Habitat management to suppress pest populations: progress and prospects. Annu. Rev. Ent., 62: 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035050

Jha, R.K., Chi, H. and Tang, L.C., 2012. A Comparison of artificial diet and hybrid sweet corn for the rearing of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) based on life table characteristics. Environ. Ent., 41: 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN11206

Kaur, J., 2012. Development of tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different cultivars of cabbage. Doctoral dissertation, PAU Ludhiana.

Kaur, T., Vasudev, A., Sohal, S.K. and Manhas, R.K., 2014. Insecticidal and growth inhibitory potential of Streptomyces hydrogenans DH16 on major pest of India, Spodoptera litura Fab. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). BMC Microbiol., 14: 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0227-1

Khan, Z.R., Pickett, J.A., Wadhams, L. and Muyekho, F., 2001. Habitat management strategies for the control of cereal stemborers and striga in maize in Kenya. Insect Sci. Appl., 21:375-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400008481

Khan, R.R., Ahmed, S. and Nisar, S., 2011. Mortality responses of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) against some conventional and new chemistry insecticides under laboratory conditions. Pak. Entomol., 33: 147-150.

Lee, K.P., Raubenheimer, D., Behmer, S.T. and Simpson, S.J., 2003. A correlation between macronutrient balancing and insect host-plant range: evidence from the specialist caterpillar Spodoptera exempta (Walker). J. Insect Physiol., 49: 1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2003.08.013

Mabrouk, A., Bekheit, H.K.M. and El-Husseini, M.M., 2001. Economic diet for rearing Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.), used for the production of the nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Egypt. J. biol. Pest Contr., 11: 127-134.

Maung, N., 2016. Study of Spodoptera litura larvae parasitoid in cabbage fields, the crucifer pest rearing on natural various foods and explain the knowledge to farmers to apply in fields of Myanmar. Proc. Ninth Agric. Res. Conf., Yezin Agricultural University, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.

Nathan, S.S. and Kalaivani, K., 2005. Efficacy of nucleopolyhedrovirus and azadirachtin on Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol. Contr., 34: 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.03.001

Naz, F., Hussain, M. and Faridullah, Din, M., 2003. Insect pests of maize and their losses. Asian J. Pl. Sci., 2: 412-414. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2003.412.414

Qin, H. G,, Zx, Y.E., Huang, S.J., Ding, J. and Luo, R.H., 2004. The correlations of the different host plants with preference level, life duration and survival rate of Spodoptera litura Fabricius. Chinese J. Eco-Agric., 12: 40-42.

Raubenheimer, D. and Simpson, S.J., 2003. Nutrient balancing in grasshoppers: behavioural and physiological correlates of diet breadth. J. exp. Biol., 206: 1669- 1681. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00336

Rea, J.H., Wratten, S.D., Sedcole, R., Cameron, P.J., Davis, S.I. and Chapman, R.B., 2002. Trap cropping to manage green vegetable bug Nezara viridula (L.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in sweet corn in New Zealand. Agric. Ent., 4: 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-9563.2002.00130.x

Rezapanah, M., Shojai-Estrabragh, S., Jehle, J.A. and Huber, J., 2008. Molecular and biological characterization of new isolates of Cydia pomonella granulovirus (CpGV) from Iran for controlling S. litura. J. Pest Sci., 1: 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-008-0204-2

Saeed, S., Sayyed, A.H. and Ahmad, I., 2010. Effect of host plants on life-history traits of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Pest Sci., 83: 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-009-0283-8

Saleem, M.A., Ahmad, M. and Sayyed, A.H., 2008. Evidence for field evolved resistance to newer insecticides in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Pakistan. Crop Prot., 27:1367-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2008.05.003

Sang, S., Wang, Z., Qi, J.W., Shu, B.S. and Zhong, G.H., 2013. Research progress on pesticide resistance of Spodoptera lituraJ. environ. Ent., 35: 808-814.

Seema, R., Goel, B.B. and Gupta, G.P., 2004. Effects of temperature on the development and reproduction of Spodoptera litura. Annls. Pl. Prot. Sci., 12: 205-206.

Shahout, H., Xu, J., Yao, X. and Jia, Q., 2011. Influence and mechanism of different host plants on the growth, development and, fecundity of reproductive system of common cutworm Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Asian J. agric. Sci., 3: 291-300.

Shelton, A.M. and Badenes-Perez, F.R., 2006. Concepts and applications of trap cropping in pest management. Annu. Rev. Ent., 51: 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.150959

Simpson, S.J., Raubenheimer, D., Behmer, S.T., Whitworth, A. and Wright, G.A., 2002. A comparison of nutritional regulation in solitarious and gregarious phase nymphs of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. J. exp. Biol., 205: 121-129.

Sorour, M.A., Khamiss, O., Abdel-Wahab, A.S., El-Sheikh, M.A.K. and Abul-Ela, S., 2011. An economically modified semi-synthetic diet for mass rearing the Egyptian cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littolaris. Acad. J. Ent., 4: 118-123.

Telang, A., Buck, N.A. and Wheeler, D.E., 2002. Response of storage protein levels to variation in dietary protein levels. J. Insect Physiol., 48: 1021-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00190-7

Tenywa, M.M., Nyamwaro, S.O., Kalibwani, R., Mogabo, J., Buruchara, R. and Fatunbi, A.O., 2018. Innovation opportunities in sorghum production in Uganda. FARA Res. Rep., 2:16-20.

Tuan, S.J., Lee, C.C. and Chi, H., 2014. Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F.) on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different conditions using the age-stage, two-sex life table. Pest Manage. Sci., 70: 805-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3618

Tuan, S.J., Yeh, C.C., Atlihan, R., Chi, H. and Tang, L.C., 2015. Demography and consumption of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) reared on cabbage and taro. J. econ. Ent., 109: 732-739. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov325

Wakil, W., Ghazanfar, M.U., Sahi, S.T., Kwon, Y.J. and Qayyum, M.A., 2011. Effect of modified meridic diet on the development and growth of tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ent. Res., 41: 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2011.00323.x

Wan, P., Wu, K.M., Huang, M.S., Yu, D.Z. and Wu, J.P., 2008. Population dynamics of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Bt cotton in the Yangtze River Valley of China. Environ. Ent., 37: 1043-1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/37.4.1043

Xue, M., Pang, Y.H., Wang, H.T., Li, Q.L. and Liu, T.X., 2010. Effects of four host plants on biology and food utilization of the cutworm, Spodoptera litura. J. Insect Sci., 10: 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.2201

Yinghua, S., Yan, D., Jin, C., Jiaxi, W. and Jianwu, W., 2017. Responses of the cutworm Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to two Bt corn hybrids expressing Cry1Ab. Sci. Rep., 7: 41577. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41577

Zhang, G.F., Wan, F.H., Liu, W.X. and Guo, J.Y., 2006. Early instar response to plant-delivered Bt-toxin in a herbivore (Spodoptera litura) and a predator (Propylaea japonica). Crop Prot., 25: 527-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.08.008

Zhu, J.H, Zhang, F.P. and Ren, H.G., 2005. Development and nutrition of Prodenia litura on four food plants. Chinese Bull. Ent., 42: 643-646.

Zhu, S.D., Lu, Z.Q., Chen, L.F. Yu, W. and Zhang, S.J., 2000. Effect of temperature and food on Spodoptera litura population. Chinese J. appl. Ecol., 11: 111-114.

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

December

Vol. 51, Iss. 6, Pages 1999-2399

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe