Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Effect of Different Brooding Sources on Growth, Blood Glucose, Cholesterol and Economic Appraisal of Three Commercial Broiler Strains

PJZ_51_2_575-582

 

 

Effect of Different Brooding Sources on Growth, Blood Glucose, Cholesterol and Economic Appraisal of Three Commercial Broiler Strains

Muhammad Shabir Shaheen1, Shahid Mehmood1, Athar Mahmud1, Jibran Hussain1, Ahmed Sultan Jatoi2, Muhammad Yaqoob3, Sohail Ahmad1 and Arshad Javid4,*

1Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore

2Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Sakrand

3Department of Clinical Studies, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi

4Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore

ABSTRACT

The concept of using different brooding systems was evaluated by using 720 day-old commercial broilers, 240 from each of the 3 strains (Ross 308, Cobb 500, Hubbard classic). All the chicks having uniform body weight were randomly distributed into 36 replicates having 20 birds each according to completely randomized design and were fed the same quantity of feed. The birds were subjected to 4 heating systems during brooding (Floor Heating, Diesel, Gas and Electricity Bulb). Growth performances, blood glucose, cholesterol level and economic appraisal in term of running cost / Kg of live meat were recorded. The results revealed that all strains generally but Ross 308 particularly maintained on floor heating system (FH) exhibited significantly (P<0.05) better FCR, EEF and livability along with higher glucose and lower cholesterol level in blood with better immune response that led to higher profit margin. All these parameters were significantly (P<0.05) lowest on gas brooder in comparison of brooding systems.


Article Information

Received 10 June 2017

Revised 12 June 2018

Accepted 01 September 2018

Available online 15 February 2019

Authors’ Contribution

MSS conducted this study. SM, AM and AJ supervised the research. MY and ASJ helped in reviewing the manuscript. SA helped in statistical analysis and formatting of manuscript. JH helped in data collection and execution of experiment.

Key words

Heating systems, Growth, Economics, Glucose, Cholesterol.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.2.575.582

* Corresponding author: arshadjavid@gmail.com

0030-9923/2019/0002-0575 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2019 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Introduction

Among the disciplines of management, brooding is the most critical segment of commercial poultry, where the foundation has been laid for a healthy flock. The term “brooding” means to provide an environment (especially temperature) in the poultry house where, the chicks feel comfortable in initial phase of life and brooding temperature can be decreased 2.8°C/week to a limit (North and Bell, 2004). Any failure in the provision of adequate environmental conditions during this phase may hamper the growth performance (Fairchild, 2012). The money that will be saved on the fuel bill will not compensate the money lost in bird performance (Deaton et al., 1996).

A good range of technologies are available for brooding. However, there are a number of advantages and disadvantages to each type of brooding equipment but poultry producers must consider many factors prior to investment, including capital costs, operating costs and performance like heat output and heat distribution (Czarick, 2008). Haq and Akhtar (2004) favored the wood brooders for open houses although such brooders produce smoke and uneven temperature inside the house. While, Ahmed et al. (2008) in their study found that gas brooders are more economical than others. Diesel brooders commonly used in environmental control houses are convenient to operate and efficient to run but very expensive along with environmental hazards and such brooders have to warm the air of shed up to 49°C to warm bedding (32°C) (Farmers, 2013). Pancake (electric bulbs brooder) cannot be used in commercial farming being expensive and difficult to manage.

Floor heating (FH) is thought to be a new and a better option for heating the poultry sheds as the heat is delivered at the bird level according to requirement. FH system can be up to 50% more efficient and economical than conventional heating system (ECOTEC Pvt.). Traditional air heaters warm the air up to 40°C to provide 32°Cat floor level, while, FH system not only provides warm bedding but keeps the litter dry that is important for good performance of birds. FH has reduced energy expense along with improvements in the performance and health status by many folds (Speller, 2011; Nahashon et al., 2005).Genetic potential of a broiler strain is a primary influential factor which needs appropriate diet along with suitable environmental conditions for optimum growth performance (Kao et al., 2011). Although growth is a complex phenomenon that is controlled by genetic (breed) and non-genetic factors (nutrition and management) yet body weight is an important parameter for measuring growth in meat type chicken. Thus, these strains may give variable results of growth and carcass qualities under similar conditions of management and nutrition (Shim et al., 2012). All traits are biologically correlated due to pleiotropic effect of genes and linkage of loci (Rosario et al., 2008). McKay (1997) remarked that the performance of the modern broiler strains is due to selective breeding. Keeping in view the above discussion, the present study was conducted to investigate the effect of different brooding systems on growth performance, blood glucose and cholesterol, and economic efficiency in three broiler strains.

 

Materials and methods

The present study was conducted to evaluate the growth performance of 3 commercial broiler strains (Hubbard classic, Ross-308 and Cobb-500) maintained under 4 brooding systems (FH, gas brooder, conventional electric bulb brooder and diesel brooder) in environmental control house. A total of 720 day old broiler chicks (240 chicks from each strain) were divided according to completely randomized design into 36 replicates having 20 chicks each. The parent flocks of the experimental chicks were almost of the similar age (42-43 weeks).The experimental birds were maintained on litter (rice husk) and same quantity of feed was offered for 35days of age. In first brooding system gas brooders have gas (LPG) cylinders linked with common room heaters were used. In second heating system iron water channels embedded in floor were used through which hot water were pass on to provide brooding temperature. In the 3rd heating system, electric bulbs hover brooders (Pancake) having 03 bulbs each of 100 watts were used. While 4th heating system was a small diesel brooder, consumed diesel 4 litter per hour and produced 9000 BTU.


 

Table I.- Growth performance influenced by different heating sources and broiler strains.

Parameters

Body weight gain (g)

Livability (%)

FCR

EEF

Uniformity (%)

FHS

1910.30±19.21a

98.07±0.14a

1.541±0.04b

385.13± 19.23a

81.39±2.90ab

Electricity

1848.26±69.78ab

95.55±0.17ab

1.60±0.03ab

317.25± 15.85ab

79.00±3.00b

Gas

1800.97±43.26b

94.00±0.60b

1.636±0.04a

283.22± 18.20b

67.22±5.35c

Diesel

1861.81±33.16ab

96.55±0.17ab

1.58±0.03ab

337.20± 6.71ab

80.78±2.55ab

Strains

Cobb

1837.83±38.97ab

95.33±0.33ab

95.58±0.14b

55.12± 0.42b

80.88±3.78ab

Hubbard

1835.38±45.04ab

96.28±0.88ab

97.00±0.37a

56.29± 0.49ab

79.00±9.25b

Ross

1880.04±22.95a

95.26±0.15ab

95.70±0.44b

57.16± 0.46a

80.34±2.08ab

Strains × brooding sources

Cobb

FHS

1888.26±25.27ab

96.66±0.33b

1.55±0.07ab

364.58± 40.55ab

83.80±2.80a

Electricity

1826.75±77.67bc

95.66±0.33bc

1.61± 0.08ab

336.79± 34.19abc

80.95±3.99ab

Gas

1818.82±23.02bc

93.06±0.30c

1.61±0.02ab

254.33± 23.17c

73.00±7.43bc

Diesel

1867.50±33.56ab

96.33±0.33b

1.57±0.03ab

334.72± 2.81abc

82.50±5.74ab

Hubbard

FHS

1900.75±26.88b

99.00±0.00a

1.55±0.08ab

389.28± 30.74ab

80.28±2.91ab

Electricity

1827.11±30.31bc

97.33±0.33ab

1.61±0.02ab

347.86± 21.60ab

79.81±6.69b

Gas

1722.22±117.54c

94.33±0.88b

1.71±0.12a

267.96± 36.62bc

67.09±8.00c

Diesel

1851.46±86.45ab

99.06±0.33a

1.59±0.07ab

349.30± 16.68ab

81.90±2.73ab

Ross

FHS

1942.89±22.11a

97.66±0.33ab

1.50±0.07b

401.53± 38.65a

81.00±3.65ab

Electricity

1881.93±72.99ab

94.66±0.33bc

1.56±0.06ab

317.09± 26.10abc

80.00±5.89ab

Gas

1821.88±53.53bc

94.00±0.15bc

1.61±0.04ab

325.37± 24.30ab

71.00±6.00bc

Diesel

1867.47±48.31ab

97.66±0.33ab

1.57±0.04ab

337.58± 11.47ab

80.00±2.99ab

FHS, floor heating system; Different alphabets on means within column show significant differences (P≤0.05).

 

Floor heating system (FHS)

FH comprised a geyser to warm the water with fire of wood, this hot water was being circulated by a mono-block low pressure pump in a series of water channels interconnected with each other. These water channels were made of iron, 20 feet long, 2 inch wide, 1 inch high and 8 inch apart from each other embedded in litter (rice husk) and fixed on floor of the brooding area. Through water channels the heat of this hot water was dissipated in to the litter through conduction phenomenon. The speed and number of circulation of this hot water was manipulated with a controller according to need of temperature, due to repeated circulation of hot water (80°C), the temperature of litter was raised to 32°C or even higher. After passing through channels, the temperature of water reduced to 50°C or even less which was made hot by geyser (80°C) easily without consuming much energy. All the general protocols were adopted regarding management, record keeping, vaccination and medication. Body weight was recorded on weekly basis, while blood glucose and cholesterol, NDV antibody titer and economic efficiency was estimated at the end of trial.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed through two-way ANOVA (Steel et al., 1997) using PROC GLM in SAS software, the comparison of means were made through Tukey’s HSD test.

 

Results

Body weight gain

In his study, brooding systems and strains showed variation regarding body weight gain. Significantly (P<0.05) the highest body weight was gained by the birds reared under FHS and the lowest by those of gas brooders. With respect to the strains (Table I), significantly (P<0.05) the highest weight was attained by Ross followed by Cobb which is marginally ahead of Hubbard. In interaction, significantly (P<0.05) the highest weight gain was attained by Ross strain over FHS and the lowest in Hubbard under gas brooder.

Livability %

Significantly (P<0.05) the best livability% was recorded when all the birds of the three strains were kept on FH particularly of Hubbard, while, the least livability was found on gas brooders in general for all strains and for Cobb in particular (Table I).

 

Table II.- Blood profile influenced by different heating sources and broiler strains.

Parameters

HI Titer

Glucose(mg/dl)

Cholesterol (mg/dl)

FHS

5.95±0.40a

169.78±5.07b

111.11±1.90a

Electricity

5.53±0.63ab

215.00±4.49a

79.11±3.01b

Gas

4.50±0.62b

231.34±2.97a

79.00±1.60b

Diesel

4.83±0.64ab

189.67±7.78ab

99.89±3.12ab

Strains

Cobb

5.41±0.35

200.33±4.64

91.08±4.48

Hubbard

5.47±0.29

205.67±7.48

89.58±4.88

Ross

5.53±0.26

196.58±8.34

93.17±4.43

Strains × brooding sources

Cobb

FHS

5.87±0.50b

170.00±2.8bc

101.67±4.41abc

Electricity

5.44±0.50abc

215.67±7.45ab

77.33±1.45bc

Gas

4.50±0.50bc

241.67±6.00a

77.00±1.15bc

Diesel

5.75±0.50abc

184.00±2.08bc

108.33±4.41ab

Hubbard

FHS

5.99±0.50a

168.33±8.82c

113.00±4.04a

Electricity

5.50±0.50b

209.33±12.02abc

75.00±2.08c

Gas

4.43±0.50c

227.00±2.51b

92.00±6.03bc

Diesel

5.81±0.50a

179.00±7.64bc

78.33±4.41bc

Ross

FHS

6.00±0.50a

167.33±10.93c

116.00±3.06a

Electricity

5.64±0.50ab

214.67±6.01ab

85.00±8.67bc

Gas

4.57±0.50bc

237.00±7.00ab

81.67±2.03bc

Diesel

5.88±0.50ab

182.33±12.02bc

102.00±1.15ab

Different alphabets on means within column show significant differences (P≤0.05).

 

Feed conversion ratio (FCR) and European efficiency factor (EEF)

The results of the study (Table I) revealed that all the strains maintained under FH exhibited significantly (P<0.05) the best FCR and EEF, while, significantly (P<0.05) the worst FCR and EEF were observed under gas brooders.Ross excelled (P<0.05) in FCR and EEF when it was reared on FH and Hubbard showed significantly (P<0.05) the worst FCR and EEF on gas brooders.

Uniformity %

Regarding uniformity, significantly (P<0.05) the worst body weight uniformity was observed on gas brooders and electric brooder, respectively (Table I), While, birds exhibited better uniformity on FH, marginally followed by diesel brooders. Among the strains, Cobb seemed significantly the most uniform on FHS and Hubbard looked significantly (P<0.05) the least uniform especially when it was reared on gas brooders.

Antibody response against New Castle disease

All rearing systems separately and in interaction showed variations in antibody titer against NDV. NDV antibody titer was found significantly (P≤0.05) higher in FHS, while, the lowest was recorded in birds reared at gas brooding system. On the other hand strains did not show any significant (P≤0.05) response to ND vaccine regarding antibody titer. In interaction, generally all three strains responded positively on FH but Ross particularly manifested the (P≤0.05) best titers (6.00±0.50) as compare to others.

Glucose and cholesterol level in blood

In this study, birds reared on different brooding systems showed differences in blood glucose level (Table II). Significantly (P<0.05) the highest glucose level was recorded at gas brooding, while, the lowest at FH. Different strains did not show any variation in blood glucose. Regarding blood cholesterol, the lowest level was recorded at gas brooding system, while, the highest at FH. Different strains did not show any major difference in their glucose level.

Economic appraisal of brooding systems

The results revealed that FH is the most efficient and beneficial brooding source for all the broiler strains resulting in the best weight gain, FCR, livability (Fig. 2). It was comparatively economical (Rs. 5/bird), followed by gas brooders (Rs. 7.3/bird).


 

Discussion

Body weight gain

Better growth performance at FHS might be due to the provision of best brooding conditions like homogeneous distribution of temperature at the bird’s level, warm and dry litter (Leva et al., 2013) that might have mitigated the enteric diseases and production of noxious gases (NH3, CO2, CO) which are the basic pre-requisites for good production performance (Miles et al., 2004). Actually, DOC is mainly dependent on the floor contact to regulate its body temperature and warm bedding is essential to facilitate bird’s normal behavior (Cooper, 2009). FH has been considered to be the best system to accomplish the brooding requirements. Similarly, Speller (2011) found that FH improved the growth performance along with health status of birds by many folds. Although (Ahmed et al., 2008) reported that gas brooders are more economical than any other brooders yet these gas brooders could not provide suitable environmental conditions during brooding which would led to poor growth performance (Fairchild, 2012).

Higher weight was gain by Ross might be attributed to different genetic potential having different body requirements (Amao et al., 2011). Difference in growth performance in different strains under similar environmental conditions have already been observed in another study (Shim et al., 2012). The highest weight gain by Ross strain over FHS may be attributed to the fact that the FH was more comfortable for all strains in general and Ross in particular to accomplish their brooding requirements than those of other brooding systems. Although, basic requirements of all strains are the same, yet the FH would have appropriately fulfilled the physiological needs of all the strains used in this experiment. Similarly (Leva et al., 2013) found that FH could provide the most suitable brooding environment.

Livability %

Better livability on FH particularly of Hubbard might be due to the fact that FH might have provided more favorable conditions in terms of temperature, hygienic litter and minimum noxious gases for all birds and fluctuation of brooding temperature under rest of brooding sources would have resulted into high mortality (Ahmed et al., 2008). Hubbard showed relatively better resistance to diseases, these results are also in accordance with the findings of (Iqbal et al., 2012) as genetic differences exist between various broiler strains for immune responses (Gerald et al., 2003).

Feed conversion ratio (FCR) and European efficiency factor (EEF)

The best FCR and EEF exhibited by birds reared under FH system could be due to the fact that FHS would have provided the best brooding conditions in the shed required for optimum growth for all strains in general and for Ross in particular. While, the competitor brooding sources (diesel, gas, electric brooders) could not provide comfortable brooding temperature which would have hampered the growth (Fairchild, 2012; Malheiros et al., 2000). Although, gas brooder appeared a bit economical after FHS yet these were least beneficial for growth and health of the all strains. These results are contrary to the findings of Ahmed et al. (2008), who observed that the gas brooders were more economical and efficient than electricity and wood brooding. Best FCR and EEF of ROSS on floor heating system indicates that experimentally provided conditions were the most suitable for Ross. Even under similar conditions, broiler strains have the tendency to behave independently (Shim et al., 2012).

Uniformity %

Cobb strain revealed better uniformity reared under FH system and it can be argued that uniformity depends primarily upon brooding conditions (mainly on temperature), if DOCs were selected having uniform (±5%) body weight at hatchery to rule out this factor being an etiology of variable uniformity of a broiler flock. Thus, solely it would be the brooding conditions (temperature) which have affected the uniformity of the birds. Results are evident that FHS and diesel brooders provided uniform and steady temperature according to the bird’s requirement. Gas brooders failed to manage the required conditions which might lead to poor uniformity especially exhibited by Hubbard. Up to 80% flock uniformity is being considered an uniform flock, while less than70% uniformity is poor one (Anonymous, 2012). The level of uniformity basically dictates the final result; poor flock uniformity goes hand in hand with delayed growth, rejects, and poor FCR (Anonymous, 2005).

Antibody response against New Castle disease

Same vaccine schedule for NDV adopted, yet the provoked immune responses were observed quite variable under different brooding systems. It can be assumed that immune response depends upon several factors including health status and micro-climatic conditions (Yonash et al., 2001; Knowles et al., 2008). As, the overall results of this study showed that birds felt more comfort on FH which might have provided such conditions (Colibasilosis and coccidiosis free along with establishing suitable temperature) at which birds immune system responded positively to the ND live vaccines (Vijendravarma et al., 2009). According to Heller et al. (1992) better general disease resistance might be gain by selection of chicken lines for antibody response against a non-replicating antigen resulted in better response to other antigens contrary to Lin et al. (2000), who illustrated that there is hardly any difference in immune response in various strains of poultry.

Glucose and cholesterol level in blood

The highest glucose level was observed in birds reared under gas brooding, while, cholesterol level was found to be higher in birds reared under FH system. It is evident from the results that concentration of glucose is reciprocal to the cholesterol. It seemed that the need for glucose increases during heat stress (Soleimani, 2010) as observed in birds reared at gas brooding system. The increase in plasma glucose might be an indicative stimulation of gluconeogenesis processes as a direct response to increased epinephrine, norepinephrine, and glucocorticoid secretion (Borges et al., 2003). Since exposure of thermal shock, reduces the feed consumption, the hepatic storage of glycogen might be the first available sources of energy leading to elevation of glucose in blood (Faisal et al., 2008; Blahová et al., 2007). So, glucose was higher in those birds who experienced some stressful environment (gas brooder) (Olanrewaju et al., 2010) contrary to cholesterol level. Some researchers like Rajman et al. (2006) are convinced that blood biochemistry can be influenced by genetic makeup, housing conditions, seasonal variation, sex and strains of chicken contrary and thermal shock led to hypoglycemia (Sahin et al., 2002; Nazifi et al., 2003)

Economic appraisal of brooding systems

FH was comparatively economical, although gas brooders are economical (Ahmed et al., 2008) to electric and diesel brooders respectively, but led to least livability having adverse effects on bird’s health. FHS has reduced energy expense along with improvements in the performance and health status by many folds (Speller, 2011) as it provided warm bedding (ECOTEC) which might facilitate the maximum stocking density (Rehau Pvt. UK). While, traditional air heaters (diesel, gas and electric brooders) warmed the air contrary to the litter. Thus, FH mitigated the ammonia production which is highly detrimental for the birds (Miles et al., 2004) and need of ventilation.

 

Conclusion

Based upon the results of this study, it can be concluded that floor heating (FH) system is proved comparatively more efficient and economical than other heating systems which results into better growth performance, improved feed efficiency and better turn over along with increased glucose with lowered Cholesterol in all broiler strains but Ross 308 in particular.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 

References

Ahmed, F., Haque, A., Yassar, A., Ashraf, M. and Sadiqui, M.Z., 2008. Effect of different brooding techniques on production performance and physiological parameters of broiler. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci., 6: 103-107.

Amao, S.R., Lamidi, O. and Olalekan, A.S., 2011. Growth performance traits in strains of broiler chicken. World J. Young Res., 1: 28.

Anonymous, 2005. Evaluating uniformity in broiler factors affecting variation. Hubbard’s Tech. Bull., 2005: 2-3.

Anonymous, 2012. Cobb broiler management guide. pp. 20-21. Available at: http://www.cobb-vantress.com/docs/default-source/management-guides/broiler-management-guide.pdf

Bayyari, G.R., Huff, W.E., Rath, N.C., Balog, J.M., Newberry, L.A., Villines, J.D., Skeeles, J.K., Anthony, N.B. and Nestor, K.E., 1997. Effect of the genetic selection of Turkeys for increased body weight and egg production on immune and physiological responses. Poult. Sci., 76: 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.2.289

Blahová, J., Dobšíková, R., Straková, E. and Suchý, P., 2007. Effect of low environmental temperature on performance and blood system in broiler chickens (Gallus domesticus). Acta Vet. Brno, 76:17-23. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200776S8S017

Borges, S.A., Fischer, A.V., da Silva, A.J., Hooge, D.M. and Cummings, K.R., 2003. Dietary electrolyte balance for broiler chickens under moderately high ambient temperatures and relative humidities. Poult. Sci., 82: 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.2.301

Ching, C.Y. and Yeh, C.C., 1992. Effect of acute heat stress in the blood characteristics of Taiwan country chickens and broilers. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci., 21: 57-66.

Cooper, O., 2009. Under floor heating halves energy bill for free range chicken flock. Farmer Weekly, UK, pp. 4.

Cotter, S.C., Myatt, J.P., Benskin, C.M.H. and Wilson, K., 2008. Selection for cuticularmelanism reveals immune function and life-history trade-offs in Spodoptera littoralis. J. Evol. Biol., 21: 1744-1754 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01587.x.

Czarick, M., Fairchild, B. and Dartnell, D., 2008. Alternative heating systems: an overview. Poult. Housing Tips, 20: 1-6. https://www.poultryventilation.com/node/4597

Deaton, J.W., Branton, S.L., Simmons, J.D. and Lott, B.D., 1996. The effect of brooding temperature on broiler performance. Poult. Sci., 75: 1217-1220. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751217

Ecotec, 2012. A manufacturing company of under floor heating system. Ecotec Pvt. Ltd., United Kingdom.

Fairchild, B., 2012. Environmental factors to control when brooding chicks. UGA Coop. Extens. Bull., 1287: 1-6.

Faisal, B.A., Abdel-Fattah, S.A., Hommosany, Y.M.E., Nermin, M., Abdel-Gawad, M. and Ali, F.M., 2008. Immuno-competence, hepatic heat shock protein and physiological responses to feed restriction and heat stress in two body weight lines of Japanese Quail. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 7: 174-183. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.174.183

Farmers, N.S.W., 2013. Floor heating system improves the performance. Poult. Int., 50: 10-13.

Gerald, B.H., Qureshi, V. and Cheema, M.A., 2003. A comparison of the immune profile of commercial broiler strains when raised on marginal and high protein diets. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 10: 3923-3930.

Haq, A. and Akhta, M., 2004. Poultry farming. Higher Education Commission, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 458.

Hayashi, K., Taniguchi, N., Kinjou, T. and Ohtsuka, A., 2001. Heat stress causes death via glucose metabolism in broiler. 13th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition and Ascites Workshop, Belgium, pp. 250.

Hazelwood, R.L., 1976. Carbohydrate metabolism. In: Avian physiology (ed. P.D. Sturkie). Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96274-5_11

Heller, E.D., Leitner, G., Friedman, A., Uni, Z., Gutman, M. and Cahaner, A., 1992. Immunological parameters in meat-type chicken lines divergently selected by antibody response to Escherichia coli vaccination. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 34: 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2427(92)90159-N

Iqbal, J., Asghar, A.M., Tanveer, A., Shamsul, H. and Sohail, H.K., 2012. Comparative performance of different economic traits of four imported broiler strains under local conditions of Pakistan. Pak. J. agric. Res., 25: 76-82.

Kao, L., Moura, D., Carvalho, T., Bueno, L. and Vercellino, R., 2011. Ammonia emissions in tunnel ventilated broiler houses. Rev. Bras. Cie. Avic., 13: 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2011000400008

Kataria, N., Kataria, A.K. and Gahlot, A.K., 2008. Ambient temperature associated variations in serum hormones and interrelated analyses of broiler chickens in arid tract. Slov. Vet. Res., 45: 127-134.

Knowles, T.G., Kestin, S.C., Haslam, S.M., Brown, S.N. and Green, L.E., 2008. Leg disorders in broiler chickens: Prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PLoS One, 3: 1545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001545

Lamont, S.J., Bolin, C. and Cheville, N., 1987. Genetic resistance to fowl cholera is linked to the major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics, 25: 284-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00404420

Leva, F.F., Camacho, J.R. and Filho, D.O., 2013. Evaluation of the heating of broilers in shed by means of gas hoods and under floor heating. Eng. Agríc., 33: 844-856. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162013000400023

Lin, H., Du, R., Xh, F.C. and Zang, Z.Y., 2000. A study on plasma biochemical indices of heat stressed broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 1210-1218.

Malheiros, R.D., Moraes, V.M.B., Bruno, L.D.G., Malheiros, E.B. and Macari. M., 2000. Environmental temperature and surface temperatures of broilers chicks in first week post-hatch. J. appl. Poult. Res., 9: 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/9.1.111

McKay, J., 1997. The next decade a breeder’s perspective. Int. Poult. Prod., 31: 213-214.

Miles, D.M., Branton, S.L. and Lott, B.D., 2004. Atmospheric ammonia is detrimental to the performance of modern commercial broilers. Poult. Sci., 83: 1650-1654. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.10.1650

Nahashon, S.N., Adefope, N., Amenyenuj, N. and Wright, D., 2005. Effects of dietary metabolizable energy and crude protein concentrations on growth performance and carcass characteristic of French guinea broilers. Poult. Sci. 84: 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.2.337

Nazifi, S., Saeb, M., Rowghani, E. and Kaveh, K., 2003. The influence of thermal stress on serum biochemical parameters of Iranian fat-tailed sheep and their correlation with triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxin (T4) and cortisol concentrations. Comp. clin. Pathol., 12: 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-003-0487-x

North, M.O. and Bell, D.D., 2004. Commercial chicken production manual, 4th ed. Springer, USA, pp. 228.

Olanrewaju, H.A., Purswell, J.L., Collier, S.D. and Branton, S.L., 2010. Effect of ambient temperature and light intensity on physiological reactions of heavy broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 89: 2668-2677. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00806

Rahimi, G., 2005. Effect of heat shock at early growth phase on glucose and calcium regulating axis in broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4: 790-794. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2005.790.794

Rajman, M., Juráni, M., Lamosová, D., Máèajová, M., Sedlaèková, M., Kostál, L., Jezová, D. and Výboh, P., 2006. The effects of feed restriction on plasma biochemistry in growing meat type chickens (Gallus gallus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 145: 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.07.004

Rantala, M.J. and Roff, D.A., 2005. An analysis of trade-offs in immune function, body size and development time in the Mediterranean field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Funct. Ecol., 19: 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00979.x

Rosario, M.F., Silva, M.A.N., Coelho, A.A.D., Savino, V.J.M. and Dias, C.T.S., 2008. Canonical discriminant analysis applied to broiler chicken performance. Animal, 2: 419-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107001012

Sahin, K., Kuck, O., Sahin, N. and Gursu, M.F., 2002. Optimal dietary concentration of vitamin E for alleviating the effect of heat stress on performance, thyroid status, ACTH and some serum metabolite and mineral concentrations in broiler. Vet. Med. Czech, 47: 110-116. https://doi.org/10.17221/5813-VETMED

Shim, M.Y., Tahir, M., Karnuah, A.B., Miller, M., Pringle, T.D., Aggrey, S.E. and Pesti, G.M., 2012. Strain and sex effects on growth performance and carcass traits of contemporary commercial broiler crosses. Poult. Sci., 91: 2942-2948. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02414

Siegel, P.B. and Gross, W.B., 1980. Production and persistence of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. I. Directional selection. Poult. Sci., 59: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0590001

Soleimani, A.F. and Zulkifil, 2010. Effect of high ambient temperature on blood parameters in Red jungle fowl, village fowl and broiler chickens. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 9: 1201-1207. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.1201.1207

Speller, D., 2011. Environmental factors effecting brooding. The Oxford Farming Conference, UK.

Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. and Dickie, D.A., 1997. Principle and procedures of statistics-A biometric approach, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Publisher Company, Toronto, Canada.

Vijendravarma, R.K., Kraaijeveld, A.R. and Godfray, H.C.J., 2009. Experimental evolution shows Drosophila melanogaster resistance to a micro-sporidian pathogen has fitness costs. Evolution, 63: 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00516.x

Yahav, S. and McMurty, J., 2001. Thermo tolerance acquisition in broiler chickens by temperature conditioning early in life: The effect of timing and ambient temperature. Poult. Sci., 80: 1662-1666. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.12.1662

Yahav, S., Rath, S. and Shinder, D., 2004. The effect of thermal manipulation during embryogenesis of broiler chicks (Gallus domesticus) on hatchability, body weight and thermoregulation after hatch. J. Thermal Biol., 29: 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2004.03.002

Yonash, N., Cheng, H.H. and Cahaner, J., 2001. DNA microsatellites linked to quantitative trait loci affecting antibody response and survival rate in meat-type chickens. Poult. Sci., 80: 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.1.22

Zulkifil, I., Norma, M.T.D., Israf, A. and Omer, A.R., 2000. The effect of early age feed restriction on subsequent response to high environmental temperature in female broiler chicken. Poult. Sci., 78: 1401-1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.10.1401

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

June

Vol. 51, Iss. 3, Pages 801-1202

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe