Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Antimicrobial Properties of Aloe Vera Gel Extracts against Bacterial Isolates from Wound of Donkey

PJZ_52_6_2333-2339

 

 

Antimicrobial Properties of Aloe Vera Gel Extracts against Bacterial Isolates from Wound of Donkey

Safia Arbab1, Rehana Buriro1, Shams Uddin Bhugio1, Atta Hussain Shah2, Jamila Soomro3, Qudratullah kalwar4, Saqib Ali Fazilani1 and Waseem Ali Vistro5*

1Department of Veterinary Pharmacology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam

2Department of Animal Product Technologies, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam

3Department of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam

4Department of Animal Reproduction, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam

5Department of Anatomy and Histology. Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam

ABSTRACT

Despite the exploration of antibacterial activity of the Aloe Vera in different families of animals. However, very limited information is documented about antibacterial activity of Aloe Vera in equines. The present study was designed to check the antibacterial activity of the Aloe Vera against most pathogens found in the wounds of donkey. For this purpose, two different concentrations 30 µl and 60 µl crude as well as ethanol extract of Aloe Vera were used. During this experiment, total 50 wound samples were collected from donkey wounds. All 50 samples were found contaminated with different bacterial organism, among all those 45, 35, 33, and 25 were recorded positive for S. aureus, E. coli, Shigella and Salmonella spp respectively. However, out of 50 sample, 34 (68%) were found to have different bacterial species and 16 (32%) were recorded with pure contamination. At 30 µl of crude Aloe Vera isolated bacterial organisms did not show any susceptibility, whereas at 60 µl, organisms showed quit sensitive reactions. In contrast, ethanol extract of Aloe Vera showed better result as compared to crude Aloe Vera at both concentration i-e 30 µl and 60 µl. Among isolates, S. aureus showed high sensitivity (15-22 mm), followed by E. coli (14-18 mm), Shigella (13-15) and Salmonella spp (11-14 mm) both concentrations. The results of this study revealed that ethanol extract of Aloe Vera showed better antibacterial activity against all isolates as compared to pure Aloe Vera extract at both concentrations used, due to its high polarity.


Article Information

Received 24 April 2019

Revised 30 June 2019

Accepted 06 July 2019

Available online 16 September 2020

Authors’ Contribution

SA, RB, SB and AHS conceived, designed and performed the experiments. JS, QK and SAF interpreted the data. SA, RB and

WAV wrote the manuscript.

Key words

Aloe vera, Antibacterial activity, Donkey, Gel, Wound

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20190424140406

* Corresponding author: drwaseemvistro@gmail.com

0030-9923/2020/0006-2333 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2020 Zoological Society of Pakistan



INTRODUCTION

Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis miller) is a cactus like xerophytes plant and about 360 species of this plant have been identified so far. It has been named due to its therapeutic effectiveness among all tested species. It is cultivated in warm climatic areas of the world. Aloe vera (AV) has been known as “secret plant” because it contains photochemical, vitamins and nutrients

(Maenthaisong et al., 2007). This plant has elongated, pointed and fleshy leaves which consists of two parts, an outer skin (green rind or latex) and an inner pulp which is colorless mucilaginous gel (Helal et al., 2003; Rodriguez et al., 2005).

Aloe vera has been used for various therapeutic purposes worldwide including Japan, Greece, and China (Rajasekaran et al., 2004; Parthipan, 2011). It has broad range of therapeutic effect and is used traditionally to treat variety of veterinary and human ailments (Blumenhal et al., 1998). It is used orally to combat several problems, including constipation, colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, respiratory tract disorders, cardio vascular disorders, immune system enhancement, inflammation, peptic ulcer, different bacterial and viral infection (Rajasekaran et al., 2004; Chatterjee et al., 2013). Topically, aloe vera has been used for the treatment of burns, sunburns, inflammatory skin disorders and wounds (Belo et al., 2006; Reider et al., 2005;

Paulsen et al., 2005). This plant recognized to have therapeutic properties used for an array of ailments including mild fever, wounds and burns, gastrointestinal aliments hyperglycemia, sexual vitality, fertility problems, cancer, immune system modulates, AIDS and different skin diseases (Rudrangshu et al., 2015).

Skin wounds in donkeys (Equus asinus) can be suitable habitat where microorganisms can grow especially in cases of saddle sores because they accelerate the risk of infection by providing perfect conditions for the propagation of some microorganism. The classic signs of equine skin wounds include pain, erythema, edema, heat and purulent discharge. In advanced stages, other signs might be observed, which include serous exudates, delayed healing, discoloration, foul odor and friable granulation tissue at the base of the wound and on disruption of these wounds, there is increased pain (Wells et al., 1988; Devrajani et al., 2000; Bowler et al., 2001).

Several studies indicated that the aloe vera has a notable effect on wound healing. To the best of our knowledge, so far very little work has been conducted on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Shigella and Salmonella spp. isolated from donkey wounds. Therefore, considering the importance of the donkey as a domesticated member of the horse family, Equidae, which is mainly used for transportation in developing countries like Pakistan, this study has been designed to check the antibacterial effect of aloe vera against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella and Salmonella spp. with the aim to provide the cheap source of medication.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of donkey wound samples

A total of 50 wound samples were collected from veterinary clinics and nomadic animals in the vicinity of Tando jam and taken to the Department of Veterinary Pharmacology, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam. All samples were collected under aseptic condition with the help of Tran’sweb tube.

Isolation and identification of pathogens

For detection of Staphylococcus aureus wound samples were sub cultured on the nutrient agar. Plates were observed for such as yellow golden colonies further confirmation was done by Gram’s staining and biochemical reactions of the isolates.

For the detection of E. coli, wound samples were sub cultured on the MacConkey agar which is typical for E. coli growth. Plates were observed for bacterial growth which included pink colonies on MacConkey’s agar and further confirmation was done by Gram’s staining and biochemical test of the isolates.

For the detection of Salmonella/ Shigella spp., wound samples were sub cultured on the Salmonella/Shigella agar (SS Agar), which is specific for Salmonella and Shigella spp. Growth plates were observed for typical colonies such as for Shigella, as transparent or translucent colorless colonies. Shigella spp were observed whereas colonies of Salmonella spp may appear with or without black centers and further confirmation was done by Gram’s staining and biochemical test of the isolates.

Extraction of gel from aloe vera leaves

The aloe vera plant leaves were collected from the local plant nursery, Hyderabad, washed with distilled water and was subjected to surface sterilization with 70% alcohol. The leaves were incised and gel was separated with the help of sterile knife. Further, the parenchymatous covering of the leaves was blended to make it homogenous and filtered with muslin cloth and sterilized in autoclave for 15 min (Agary et al., 2005). The filtered gel was used as stock solution (100% concentration).

Ethanol extraction method

For ethanol extraction, fresh aloe vera gel was dried in the oven at 80 ºC for 48 h and then powdered. Ten grams of this powder was dissolved in 100 ml of ethanol and left for 24 h. The contents were filtered through Whatman filter paper No.1 and filtrate was evaporated to dryness. This dried extract was further powdered and dissolved in 10 ml of distilled water and sterilized. The resultant solution was kept at 4 ºC, and used as stock solution (Chatterjee et al., 2013).

Disc preparation

The 6 mm (diameter) discs were prepared from Whatman No.1 filter paper. The discs were sterilized by autoclaving at 120 ºC for 15 min. After sterilization, the moisture containing discs were dried in hot air oven at 50 ºC for 1 h (Arunkumarand Muthuselvam, 2009). The prepared discs were kept under aseptic condition for further use.

Crude and ethanol extract of aloe vera gel sensitivity tests

To check the susceptibility of the isolated organisms against crude and ethanol extract of aloe vera at different concentrations i-e 30 µl and 60 µl, aloe vera gel was used to check susceptibility and resistance pattern of above four bacterial isolates.

The surface of Muller-Hinton agar was dried by incubating at 37 ºC for 30 min. The isolated colonies were selected and dispended in barium chloride. The sterile cotton swab was dipped in the bacterial solution and then rolled over the surface of the agar medium and evenly with bacterial suspension and placed in incubator for 30 minutes to get dried. Sterile Whatman NO.1 filter paper discs with absorbed aloe vera extracts, crude as well as ethanol extract at different concentrations i-e 30µl and 60µl, and blank/control (without any aloe vera) discs were placed on Muller Hinton agar plate with the help of sterile forceps and slightly pressed to make it adhere to the surface of the medium. The plates were closed, wrapped in polythene bag, kept inverted (medium up and disc downward) and incubated for 24 h at 37 ºC.


 

 

RESULTS and discussion

The present study was aimed to compare the antibacterial activity of crude and ethanol extract of aloe vera at different concentrations against some common pathogenic bacterial isolated from donkey wounds.

Prevalence of bacteria isolated from wounds

A total of 50 wound samples were examined and all were recorded positive for different organisms. Out of 50 samples, 45, 35, 33 and 25 were found positive for Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Shigella and Salmonella Spp, respectively (Table I). All organisms were identified on their morphological, cultural characteristics and staining reactions. Organisms were further confirmed by their biochemical reactions. The incidence recorded 90%, 70%, 66% and 50%, respectively. A similar type of study was done to isolate the bacterial organisms from wound samples of animals by various workers throughout world. However, the comparison of the present figures can be compared with the results of (Rind and Khan, 2000), who isolated and characterized bacterial species from surgical and non-surgical wounds located on skins and hides of domestic animals. Their results showed, Staphylococcus aureusas most prevalent organisms followed by Escherichia coli and Bacillus spp isolates from buffaloes, cattle, sheep and goat wounds. Another study showed that Staphylococcus are the common pathogen isolates from wounds of dogs (Kelly et al., 1993).

The result of the current study is in accordance with the previously reported studies that showed isolated different species of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from skin wounds of cattle, sheep, goats and dogs and result indicated that among all organisms Staphylococcus aureus was a predominant species, whereas E. coli was on list after Staphylococcus. These studies showed that S. aureus was prevalent among all other isolates from other animals. (Kelly et al., 1993; Dewani et al., 2000). Different species of bacteria were isolated from cattle, sheep and goat and besides other animals Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli and Micrococcus were found most prevalent (Khan and Rind, 2001).

 

Table I. Percentage prevalence of bacterial organisms, and (mixed and individual bacterial species) from donkey wounds.

Bacterial species

Total no. of wound samples

No. of positive wound samples

Percentage

Staphylococcus aureus

50

45

90%

Escherichia coli

50

35

70%

Shigella spp

50

33

66%

Salmonella spp

50

25

50%

Pure bacterial spp

50

16

30%

No of contaminated samples into mixed bacterial spp

34

64

68%

 

Table II. Zone of inhibition produced by crude ethanol extract of aloe vera extract at different concentrations (30µl and 60 µl).

Bacterial species

30µl

Sensitivity

60µl

Sensitivity

Crude extract

Staphylococcus aureus

0

--

12mm

+++

Escherichia coli

0

--

10mm

+++

Shigella spp

0

--

9mm

+++

Salmonella spp

0

--

7mm

+++

Ethanol extract

Staphylococcus aureus

15mm

++++

22mm

++++

Escherichia coli

14mm

++++

18mm

++++

Shigella spp

13mm

++++

15mm

++++

Salmonella spp

11mm

++++

14mm

++++

 

--, no sensitivity (absence of clear zone); +, weak sensitivity (clear zone with 1-2m); ++, moderate sensitivity (clear zone with 3-7mm); +++, quite sensitivity (clear zone with 8-11mm); ++++, highly sensitive (clear zone with 12-15mm or above).

 

The current study observed that S. aureus was the most common organism present in wound, as Staphylococcus is prevalent in the environment and form where it can get access to the wounds which are source of bacterial propagation. Similarly, the same species were observed the most dominant and common species in the wounds of camel (Devrajani et al., 2000).

Out of 50 wound samples taken from donkey wounds, 16 (32%) were contaminated with pure bacterial species, whereas 34 (68%) were found having contamination with mixed bacterial species (Table II).

It is clear that mixed infection was common in wound sample of donkey. The data of other study showed that out of 46 different animals wound samples 35 were found to be contaminated with mixed organisms, while in 11 samples had single bacterial species. It is concluded that mixed infections are always common in the wound samples (Kamla et al., 2010). In another study in which the bacterial organisms were isolated from human wounds, polymicrobial infection was common and recorded in 59 (27·1%) of the samples (Bessa et al., 2015). It was reported that in wound samples from sheep and goats, more than 80% were with mixed infections, while 20% samples were contaminated with pure infection. It was clear from the results that mixed infections are common in wound samples of animals (Talan et al., 1989).

Susceptibility of bacteria to crude aloe vera extract

Two different concentrations i-e 30 µl and 60 µl of crude aloe vera gel were used to check the susceptibility of the isolated organisms. The results indicated that 30 µl crude extract of aloe vera did not show any result and no clear sensitivity zone was formed around the disc, whereas 60 µl of crude extract of aloe vera produced a clear zone and organisms showed quite sensitive reaction against crude extract (Table II).

Susceptibility of bacteria to ethanol extract of aloe vera

Using ethanol extracts showed the better results as compared to crude aloe vera at both concentrations i-e 30 and 60 µl. S. aureus was recorded as most susceptible among all isolates and recorded highly sensitive (15 to 22 mm), followed by E. coli (14 to 18 mm), Shigella (13 to 15 mm) and Salmonella (11 to 14 mm), respectively. Ethanol extract showed greater susceptibility against gram positive as well as gram negative isolates at 60 µl (Table II).

Study was conducted to check the antibacterial activity of ethanol and chloroform extract of aloe vera, ethanol extract of A. Vera which exhibited maximum inhibition against S. aureus. S. pneumonia and B. subtilis (JothiKarumari et al., 2014). A similar kind of investigation was carried out in which ethanol extract was used and it showed the greatest effect on S. aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebisella pneumoniae and shigella compared to pure Aloe extract. Methanol extract exhibited maximum antibacterial activity against S. aureus 24 mm, followed by B. cereus (Rudrangshu et al., 2015). The result of the current study are in accordance with the previously reported studies showed greater susceptibility against gram positive as well as gram negative isolates while, significantly least inhibition was with chloroform extract (Cera et al., 1980; Azghani et al., 1995). In another study ethanol extract of aloe vera exhibited greater antimicrobial activity besides methanol, chloroform and Di-chloro Methane extracts (Rudrangshu et al., 2015).

The current study also showed agreement with the previous studies. The result of current study are showed that ethanol extract showed 100% efficacy and susceptibility against gram positive as well as gram negative isolates same as antibiotics. Ethanol extract showed better result as compare to crude extract because ethanol is more polar than water. Apart from that, a lower antimicrobial action against Gram-negative has been recorded as compared to Gram-positive organism because of the presence of additional lipopolysaccharide layer in the Gram-positive bacteria (Matu et al., 2003).

 

CONCLUSION

It could be concluded from the present study that ethanol extract of aloe vera showed greater efficacy against bacterial isolates as compared to crude aloe vera extract.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared is no conflict of interests.

 

REFERENCES

Agary, O.O., Olaleye, M.T. and Bello- Michael, C.O., 2005. Comparative activities of Aloe vera gel and leaf. Afr. J. Biotehnol., 4: 1413-1414.

Arunkumar, S. and Muthuselvam, M., 2009. Analysis of physiochemical constituents and antimicrobial activities of aloe vera against pathogens. World J. agric. Sci., 5: 572-176.

Azghani, A.O., Williams, I. Holiday., D.B. and Johnson, A.R., 1995. A beta- linked mannan inhibits adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to human lung epithelial cells. Glycobiology, 5: 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/5.1.39

Belo, S.E., Lorena, R.G. and Patricia, M.B., 2006. Moisturizing effect of cosmetic formulations containing aloe vera extract in different concentrations assessed by skin bioengineering techniques. Skin Res. Technol., 12: 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0909-752X.2006.00155.x

Bessa, L.J., Fazii, P., Di Giulio, M., Cellini, L., 2015. Bacterial isolates from infected wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern: Some remarks about wound infection. Int. Wound J., 12:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12049

Blumenhal, M., Busse, N.R. and Golddberg, A., 1998. The complete commission E. monographs therapeutic guide to herbal medicine, Boson M.A. Integrative Medicine Communications, pp. 80-81.

Bowler, P.G., Duerden, B.I. and Armstrong, D.G., 2001. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 14: 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.14.2.244-269.2001

Cera, L.M., Heggers, J.P. Robson., M.C. and Hag-Strom, W.J., 1980. The therapeutic efficacy of aloe vera cream (Dermaide Aloe) in thermal injuries. Two case reports. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., 16: 768-772.

Chatterjee, P., Charkarborty, B. and Nandy, S., 2013. aloe vera plant: review with significant pharmacological activities mintage. J. Pharmaceut. Med. Sci., 2: 21-24.

Devrajani, K., Abubakar, M., Fazlani, S.A., Shahid, F., Shah, Q.A. and Rashid, I., 2000. Occurrence and prevalence of bacterial species as identified from camel wounds. Int. J. Agro Vet. med. Sci., 4: 96-104.

Dewani, P.R., 2000. Bacteriological studies on mastitis in ewes and goats. J. Anim. Vet. Advan., 1: 98-100.

Glimar, G.A., Rall, W.W.T., Nies, S.A. and Taylor, P., 1992. Pharmacolgical basis of therapeutics, II. English edition. McGraw- Intern. Edi Med. Ser.

Helal, E.G.M., Mohammed, H.A., Ashrf, M.M. and Al-Kamel, A., 2003. Effect of aloe vera extract on some physiological parameters in diabetic albino rats. Eygpt J. Hosp. Med., 12: 147-152.

Jothi, K.R., Vijayalakshmi, K., Tamilarasi, L. and Ezhilarasi, B., 2014. Antibacterial activity of leaf extracts of aloe vera, Ocimum sanctum and Sesbania Grandi flora against the gram positive bacteria. Asian J. Biomed. Pharmaceut. Sci., 35: 2249-622.

Kamla, D., Muhammad, A., Sarfaraz, A.F., Faraz, S., Qurban, A.S. and Imran, R., 2010. Occurrence and prevalence of bacterial species as identified from camel wounds. Int. J. Agro Vet. med. Sci., 4: 96-104.

Kelly, P.J, Mason, P.R., Els, J. and Matlrewman, L.A., 1993. Pathogens in dog bite wounds in dogs in Harare, Zimbabwe. Vet. Rec., 131: 464-466. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.131.20.464

Khan, T.S. and Rind, R., 2001. Bacteriological studies on surgical and nonsurgical wound located on body surface of animals. Pak. J. biol. Sci., 4: 696-702.

Maenthaisong, R., Chaiyakunapruk, N. and Niruntraporn, S., 2007. The efficacy of aloe vera for burn wound healing: A systematic review. Burns, 33: 713-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.384

Matu, E.N. and Vanstaden, J., 2003. Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities of some plants used for medicinal purpose in Kenya. J. Ethnopharmacol., 87: 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00107-7

Matu, E.N. and Van Staden, J., 2003. Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities of some plants used for medicinal purposes in Kenya.

Olaleye, M.T., Olaleye, M.T. and Bello-Michael, C.O., 2005. Comparative antimicrobial activities of aloe vera gel and leaf. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 4: 1413-1414.

Parthipan, M., Thomas, B. and Rajendran, A., 2011. Habitat diversity, morphological and systematic analysis of multipotential species of Aloe barbadensis Mill. (Liliaceae from the Sothern Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu. India. J. Res. Biol., 1: 237- 241.

Paulsen, E., Korsholm, L. and Brandrupt, F., 2005. A double-blind, placebo- controlled study of a commercial aloe vera gel in the treatment of slight to moderate psoriasis vulgaris. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 19: 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.01186.x

Rajasekarn, S., Ravi, K., Sivagnam, K. and Subramanian, S., 2004. Beneficial effects of aloe vera leaf gel extract on lipid profile status in rats with streptozotocin diabetes. Clin. exp. Pharmacol. Physiol., 33:232-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2006.04351.x

Reider, N., Issa, A., Hawranek, T., Schuster, C., Aberer, W., Kofler, H. and Hausen. B.N., 2005. Absence of contact sensitization to aloe vera (L.) burm. f. Contact Dermatitis, 53: 332–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00713.x

Rind, R. and Khan, T.S., 2000. Antibiogram sensitivity of bacterial organisms identified from surgical and non-surgical wounds of animal. Pak. J. biol. Sci., 3: 1719-1723.

Rodriguez, D.J., Castillo, D.R.H., Rodriguez, G. and Sanchez, J.L.A., 2005.Antifungal activity in vitro of aloe vera pulp and liquid fraction against plant pathogenic fungi. Indust. Crops Prod., 21: 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.01.002

Rudrangshu, C., Dushyant, S., Amita, G., Dimri, A., Pandita, S., Chaudhary, S. and Aggarwal, M.L., 2015. Comparative study of antimicrobial activity of aloe vera gel and antibiotics against isolate from fast food. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci., 4: 1058- 1073.

Talan, D.A., Staatz, D., Staaz, A., Goldstein, E.J.C., Singer, K. and Overtruf, G.D., 1989. Wound infections: Laboratory characterization of a newly recognized zoonotic pathogen. J. clin. Microbiol., 27: 78-81.

Wells D., Krecek, R.C., Wells, M., Guthrie, A.J. and Louren, J.C., 1988. Helminth levels of working donkeys kept under different management systems in the Moretele1 district of the North West Province, South Africa, Vet. Parasitol., 77:163-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00105-8

Zhang, X., Liu, W., Liu, D., Zhao, T. and Tian, H., 2006. Isolation, structure elucidation, antioxidative, and immunomodulatory properties of two novel dihydrocoumarin from aloe vera. Bioorg. med. Chem. Lett., 16:949-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.10.096

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Vol. 52, Iss. 5, Pages 1631-2026

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe