Research Article

 

Epidemiological Survey of Fascioliasis in Cattle, Buffalo and Goat in Mahottari and Dhanusha, Nepal

 

Saroj Kumar Yadav1, Md. Ahaduzzaman2, Sudeb Sarker3, Md. Abu Sayeed2, Md. Ahasanul Hoque2

1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; 2Department of Medicine and Surgery, Chittagong Veterinary & Animal Sciences University (CVASU), Bangladesh; 3Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Bangladesh.

Editor | Muhammad Imran Rashid, Department of Parasitology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Received | July 06, 2015; Revised | August 18, 2015; Accepted | August 20, 2015; Published | September 29, 2015

*Correspondence | Md. Ahaduzzaman, Chittagong Veterinary & Animal Sciences University (CVASU), Bangladesh; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Yadav SK, Ahaduzzaman M, Sarker S, Sayeed MA, Hoque MA (2015). Epidemiological survey of fascioliasis in cattle, buffalo and goat in Mahottari and Dhanusha, Nepal. J. Adv. Parasitol. 2(3): 51-56.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jap/2015/2.3.52.56

ISSN | 2311-4096

Copyright © 2015 Yadav et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Introduction

 

Fascioliasis is a parasitic disease, caused by two species of trematode: Fasciola gigantica and F. hepatica commonly known as liver fluke. Fasciola hepatica has a worldwide distribution, but predominates in temperate zones while Fasciola gigantica is found in most continents, primarily in tropical regions (Andrews, 1999; Bennema et al., 2014). Both species are transmitted by the snails of the family Lymnaeidae. There are about 75 biotopes of Lymnaeidae snails were found responsible for the transmission (Caron et al., 2014). Infection with Fasciola spp., are usually associated with grazing wetland and drinking places contaminated by the infective metacercariae (Payne, 1990). Moreover, the distribution and abundance of fascioliasis is extremely related to geological position, topography and environmental conditions (Dutra et al., 2010). Based on this, climatic factors have been reported to be a sensitive means of predicting the annual prevalence and geospatial variability (Fuentes, 2006). This fluke infects the bile duct of the final host especially domestic ruminants such as cattle (Bos taurus), buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis), goats (Capra hircus) and sheep (Ovis aries) that have a significant contributory role in national and social economic condition across the globe (Choubisa and Jaroli, 2013). Fasciola can also infect human (Homo sapiens) and is classified in Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD). In livestock, fascioliasis is important for losses caused by either mortality in acute cases or weight loss, infertility and reduced production in chronic cases (Siddiki et al., 2010). Although several efforts have been available for the diagnosis of fascioliasis through immunological and molecular techniques, but still detection of eggs by faecal examination techniques remains as the gold standard for the diagnosis of trematode infection like fascioliasis (Esteban et al., 2014). Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the Fasciola spp. infection in cattle, buffalo and goat in Mahottari and Dhanusha of Nepal, adopted qualitative and quantitative technique to identify the prevalence and risk factors for better and appropriate control strategies.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Study Area

The study was conducted in two different districts of Nepal, named Mahottari and Dhanusha (Figure 1). Geographically Mahottari and Dhanusha fall in the arid and semi-arid hydrological zones, with average annual rainfall of 2,020 mm (Mahottari) and 1,480 mm (Dhanusha) mostly occur during the monsoon period (June to September). Average temperatures range between 6°C to 40°C in Mahottari and 11°C to 30°C in Dhanusha respectively. Both districts are naturally riverine and experiences five seasons: summer, monsoon, autumn, winter and spring. Moreover, a quarter of Mahottari territory is forested (UN, 2013).

 

 

Epidemiological Data Collection

Species, age, sex and body condition score of each individual animal were recorded using a structured record keeping sheet through physical inspection and face-to-face interview.

 

Sample Collection and Transportation

An opportunistic cross-sectional coprological survey was performed in plain riverside rural areas of Mahottari and Dhanusha districts of Nepal during July, 2014 with the aim of estimating prevalence of fascioliasis in local breeds of cattle (Bos indicus), buffalo (Bos bubalis) and goat (Capra hircus). Mixed livestock, household farms were considered for the study. One individual animal of each livestock species per household was sampled. A total of 300 faecal samples were collected from cattle, buffalo and goat directly from the rectum of animal using hand glove. Samples were placed in 10% formalin containing sterile vials labelled with unique identity numbers, transferred to the laboratory at Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chittagong, Bangladesh and stored at 4°C until being evaluated.

 

Examination of Samples

Two different types of qualitative analyses, namely direct and sedimentation technique were followed to detect the eggs in the faecal materials. The direct smear method for faecal examination was performed, as described by Hossain et al. (2011). At least three smears were prepared for each sample and eggs were identified on the basis of their morphological features (Soulsby, 1986). In addition, the Modified McMaster Counting technique as described by Soulsby (1986) was performed to determine the parasitic load (egg per gram).

 

Epidemiological Data Analysis

Field and laboratory data were entered into the Microsoft Excel Program 2007. Data were sorted and checked the integrity before exporting to STATA 13 (Stata Corp, 4905, Lakeway Drive, College station, TX 77845, USA) for epidemiological analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed on qualitative and quantitative results of fascioliasis. A fisher’s exact test was applied to assess the association between Fasciola spp. infection (yes or no) and the selected factors viz. age, sex and body condition score. To determine the age wise prevalence all ages were categorized based on percentile that is 50% in one group and 50% in another group. The results were presented as frequency, percentage, mean and 95% confidence interval (Cl). The set level of significance was 0.05. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant in all statistical tests at confidence interval 95%.

 

Table 1: Prevalence and qualitative evaluation of faecal samples for fascioliasis in ruminants in Mahottari and Dhanusha districts of Nepal by direct smear and sedimentation diagnostic methods

Species	Total no of samples	Mahottari		Dhanusha
		N (%)	CI (%)	N (%)	CI (%)
Cattle	100	36 (70.59)	57.51- 83.77	15 (29.41)	17.86 -44.61
Buffalo	100	40 (58.82)	66.28- 89.97	28 (41.18)	41.25 -70.01
Goat	100	32 (68.09)	49.19- 77.08	15 (31.91)	17.86 -44.61

 

RESULTS

 

Overall qualitative prevalence of fascioliasis among cattle, buffalo and goat are displayed in Table 1 and quantitative prevalence in Table 2. In both methods prevalence and intensity was higher in Mahottari than the Dhanusha district and there variations were significant (p<0.05). The female

 

Table 2: Prevalence, intensity and quantitative evaluation of faecal samples for fascioliasis in ruminants in Mahottari and Dhanusha districts of Nepal by Modified McMaster technique

Species	Total no of samples	No of positive samples	Mean eggs (min–max)	% CI	Mahottari		Dhanusha
					Mean egg (min–max)	Std. dev.	Mean egg (min–max)	Std. dev.
Cattle	100	51	66 (0-200)	51.6- 80.4	90 (0-200)	67.76	42 (0-200)	70.25
Buffalo	100	68	118 (0-400)	97. 4-138.6	146 (0-400)	105.39	90 (0-300)	95.30
Goat	100	47	54 (0-200)	41.3-66.7	76 (0-200)	65.65	32 (0-200)	51.27

 

Table 3: Prevalence and qualitative evaluation of faecal samples for fascioliasis infection in ruminants according to sex, age and body condition score (BCS) in Mahottari and Dhanusha districts of Nepal

Parameters		Cattle		Buffalo		Goat		P value
		N (%)	% CI	N (%)	% CI	N (%)	% CI
Sex	Male	9 (17.7)	8.4- 31.0	19 (27.9)	17.7-40.1	15 (31.9)	19.1-47.1	0.170
	Female	42 (82.3)	69.1-92.0	49 (72.1)	59.9-82.3	32 (68.1)	52.9-80.9
Age1(Year)	Less or equal to 5	39 (54.9)	62.5-87.2	-	-	-	-	0.012
	More than 5	12 (41.4)	12.8-37.5	-	-	-	-
	Less or equal to 3	-	-	47 (70.2)	56.7-79.8	-	-
	More than 3	-	-	21 (63.6)	20.2-43.3	-	-
	Less or equal to 1	-	-	-	-	31 (49.2)	50.7-79.1
	More than 1	-	-	-	-	16 (43.2)	.20.9-49.3
BCS	Average	1 (1.9)	0.05-10.4	57 (83.8)	72.9-91.6	38 (80.9)	66.7-90.9	0.011
	Good	1 (1.9)	0.05-10.4	5 (7.4)	2.4- 16.3	3 (6.4)	1.3-17.5
	Cachectic	49 (96.1)	86.5-99.5	6 (8.8)	3.3-18.2	6 (12.8)	4.8-25.7
Grazing system2	Tethering	-	-	-	-	17 (36.17)	10.2-25.8	0.008
	Free ranged	-	-	-	-	30 (63.83)	21.2-39.9

 

1age values are according to percentile to minimize wide age variation among species; 2 cattle and buffaloes were free ranged

 

animals were more likely to infected in compared to the males, but was statistically insignificant (p=0.170). Moreover, the body condition score (BCS) of the animals found significant effect on the prevalence of fascioliasis (p<0.05). Cattle suffering for fascioliasis were mostly cachectic, on the other hand buffaloes and goats were in average BCS (Table 3). Goats grazed on free ranged system were found more infected by fascioliasis than that of reared under tethered husbandry practice (p<0.05).

 

DISCUSSION

 

Prevalence of Fascioliasis

The definitive host range for Fasciola spp. is widely diverse and includes household ruminants. We selected cattle, buffalo and goat for this study because these livestock species are the principal source of household income in the rural areas. In this study it was found that the prevalence was more in buffalo followed by cattle and goat. This may be due to variation in grazing habit of individual species, as buffaloes are more likely to graze on swampy ground and goats are on dry pasture therefore less chance for goat to ingest metacercariae and vice versa. Similar results were reported in another study at Punjab, Pakistan; the species-wise prevalence of fasciolosis was found higher in buffaloes (30.50%) as compared to cattle (20.42%) (Khan et al., 2009), but in contrast with findings by Choubisa and Jaroli (2013), who found goats were more infected by fascioliasis than buffaloes at Dungarpur and Udaipur districts of southern Rajasthan, India, which may be due to variation in husbandry practice. Moreover, remarkably high (42.06%) prevalence was found by Bhutto et al. (2012) in buffalo in Sindh province of Pakistan and the incidence was almost double in female (45.08%) in comparison of male (20.89%), are in-line with this study. In China, the prevalence was about 44.7% with Fasciola hepatica and 24.9% with Fasciola gigantica in water buffalo (Liu et al., 2009). Another coproscopy examination reported that, the overall prevalence of fascioliasis in traditional, large-scale dairy and small-scale dairy cattle was 63.8%, 46.2% and 28.4%, respectively; in Iringa district, Tanzania (Keyyu et al., 2006) is almost double than the findings of this study. Joshi (1988) found above 50% prevalence of fascioliasis from cattle and buffalo in six villages of mid-western hills of Nepal. On the other hand, in Sylhet district of Bangladesh, overall prevalence of caprine fascioliasis was observed 20.75% and the rate was found higher in female goats (Hossain et al., 2011).

 

Effects of Age on Fascioliasis

We also found that animals of younger aged group were more infected than the older group, which may be due to the development of partial immunity against fascioliasis by the parasitized hosts. Moreover, Fasciola sp., are capable to develop an escape mechanism from the natural host immunity (Emmanuelle and Alain, 2010). In contrast, Fatima et al. (2012) noticed that a higher infection rate was recorded in older animals than in young. This speculated variation probably for random sampling strategy, where the age variation was wide; therefore, we sorted all animals age as percentile to limit the error and calculate age-wise prevalence.

 

Effects of Grazing System on Fascioliasis

It is important to realize, grazing nature and husbandry practice enrol an optimal role in the prevalence of the diseases having multiple host. Here the studied population of cattle and buffaloes were absolutely free ranged pasture grazing, but goats were either tethered or free ranged and the prevalence was notably higher in free ranged compared to tethered and which may be due to expose more contact to the risk factors such as the presence of metacercaria. Oryan et al. (2011) suggested that, differences in the animal husbandry conditions of ruminates, easier accessibility to intermediate hosts and hereditary resistance to parasitic infections might be the reasons for differences in the prevalence rate and infection of these animals.

 

Conclusion

 

The present study reported species, age, sex, grazing system and body condition were the factors that influence the prevalence of fasciolosis in cattle, buffalo and goat in Nepal. These parameters need to be emphasized during the planning for effective management and control of fascioliasis.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

 

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 

Ethical statement

 

There was nothing to violate against animal ethics and welfare.

 

Authors Contribution

 

Saroj Kumar Yadav collected the samples from sampling areas. Saroj Kumar Yadav, Md. Ahaduzzaman and Sudeb Sarker carried out the laboratory experimentation. Md. Abu Sayeed and Md. Ahasanul Hoque analyzed the data. Md. Ahaduzzaman and Md. Ahasanul Hoque designed the research work, drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

We are very grateful to the animal owners for their cordial participation to fill up the questionnaire.

 

REFERENCES

 

Andrews SJ (1999). The life Cycle of Fasciola hepatica. In: Fasciolosis, Bull. Anim. Health Prod. Afr. 23(1): 57-86.

Bennema SC, Scholte RGC, Molento MB, Medeiros C, Carvalho OS (2014). Fasciola hepatica in bovines in Brazil: data availability and spatial distribution. Rev. Inst. Med. trop. S. Paulo. 56(1): 35-41.

Bhutto B, Arijo A, Phullan MS, Rind R (2012). Prevalence of fascioliasis in buffaloes under different agro-climatic areas of Sindh Province of Pakistan. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 14(2): 241-245

Caron Y, Martens K, Lempereur L, Saegerman C, Losson B (2014). New insight in lymnaeid snails (Mollusca, Gastropoda) as intermediate hosts of Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda, Digenea) in Belgium and Luxembourg. Parasit. Vectors. 7(1): 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-66

Choubisa SL, Jaroli VJ (2013). Gastrointestinal parasitic infection in diverse species of domestic ruminants inhabiting tribal rural areas of southern Rajasthan, India. J. Parasit. Dis. 37(2): 271-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0178-0

Dutra LH, Molento MB, Naumann CRC, Biondo AW, Fortes FS, Savio D, Malone JB (2010). Mapping risk of bovine fasciolosis in the south of Brazil using geographic information systems. Vet. Parasitol. 169(1-2): 76-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.12.015

Emmanuelle M, Alain C (2010). Immunity against helminths: Interactions with the host and the intercurrent infections. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. (428593): 9.

Esteban JG, Muñoz-Antoli C, Toledo R, Ash LR (2014). Diagnosis of human trematode infections. In Digenetic Trematodes, Springer New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0915-5_9

Fatima M, Chishti MZ, Ahmad F, Lone BA (2012). Epidemiological Study of Fasciolosis in Cattle of Kashmir Valley. Adv. Biol. Res. 6(3): 106-109.

Fuentes MV (2006). Remote sensing and climate data as a key for understanding fasciolosis transmission in the Andes, review and update of an ongoing interdisciplinary project. Geospat. Health 1(1): 59-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/gh.2006.281

Hossain MM, Paul S, Rahman MM, Hossain FMA, Hossain MT, Islam MR (2011). Prevalence and economic significance of caprine fascioliasis at Sylhet district of Bangladesh. Pak. Vet. J. 31(2): 113-116.

Joshi BR (1988). Prevalence of Fascioliasis (Liverfluke) in Cattle and Buffaloes in the Mid-western Hills of Nepal. J. Inst. Agri. Anim. Sci. 9(1): 111-114.

Keyyu JD, Kassuku AA, Msalilwa LP, Monrad J, Kyvsgaard NC (2006). Cross-sectional prevalence of helminth infections in cattle on traditional, small-scale and large-scale dairy farms in Iringa district, Tanzania. Vet. Res. Commun. 30(1): 45-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11259-005-3176-1

Khan MK, Sajid MS, Khan MN, Iqbal Z, Iqbal MU (2009). Bovine fasciolosis: prevalence, effects of treatment on productivity and cost benefit analysis in five districts of Punjab, Pakistan. Res. Vet. Sci. 87(1): 70-75.

Liu Y, Li F, Liu W, Dai RS, Tan YM, He DS, Zhu XQ (2009). Prevalence of helminths in water buffaloes in Hunan Province, China. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 41(4): 543-546.

Oryan A, Mansourian M, Moazeni M, Nikahval B, Barband S (2011). Liver distomatosis in cattle, sheep and goats of Northeastern Iran. Global Vet. 6(3): 241-246.

Payne W (1990). An introduction to animal husbandry in the tropics, Black well science. Oxford. London.

Siddiki AZ, Uddin MB, Hasan MB, Hossain MF, Rahman MM, Das BC, Sarker MS, Hossain MA (2010). Coproscopic and haematological approaches to determine the prevalence of helminthiasis and protozoan diseases of Red Chittagong Cattle (RCC) breed in Bangladesh. Pak. Vet. J. 30(1): 1-6.

Soulsby EJL (1986). Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of DomesticatedAnimals, 7th ed. The ELBS and Bailliers, Tindle, Cassell, London, 763-766.

UN (2013). UNDAF District Profile, http://un.info.np/Net/NeoDocs/View/4224