Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

The Journal of Advances in Parasitology

JAP_MH20150716230705_Othman et al

 

 

Research Article

 

Detection of Malaria in Healthy Blood Donors using PCR in an Endemic Area in Yemen

 

Ragaa Ali Othman1*, Hanan Elsayed Eldeek1, Amal Mohammed Almatary1, Ayat Abdelrahman Sayed2, Asmaa Alsakaf3

1Department of Parasitology; 2Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt; 3Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Yemen.

 

Abstract | The transmission of malaria by blood transfusion is one of the most important problems when selecting blood donors in transfusion centres particularly in endemic areas. Traditionally, malaria diagnosis has been made using thick blood smears, but more sensitive techniques are required especially in blood donor screening. The present study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic performance of nested PCR for detection of malaria parasites in healthy blood donors compared with light microscopy. Two hundred blood samples were collected randomly from healthy blood donors presented to the blood bank at the Almukalla Hospital, Hadramout Governorate, Yemen. Light microscopic examination of thin and thick blood smears and nested PCR were performed on the blood samples. Out of the 200 blood samples,148 were taken from males (74%) and 52 from females (26%), with an average age of 29.8+8.4. Twenty-eight out of the 200 samples (14%) were detected positive for Plasmodium by light microscopy, 2 (1%) of them were identified as Plasmodium vivax and 26 (13%) as Plasmodium falciparum. Thirty-three out of the 200 samples (16.5%) were detected positive by nested PCR, which were all identified as Plasmodium falciparum including 5 samples detected negative by light microscopy. It was concluded that nested PCR is the most appropriate method for population-based screening of blood donors for malaria parasites. It enabled the identification of P. falciparum in a considerable proportion of clinically healthy donors, highlighting the potential risk for transfusion-transmitted malaria. This tool can be adopted for the screening of malaria in haemotherapy centres, especially in malaria-endemic areas.

 

Keywords | Malaria, Blood donor, Microscopy, Nested PCR

 

Editor | Muhammad Imran Rashid, Department of Parasitology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Received | July 16, 2015; Revised | August 05, 2015; Accepted | August 06, 2015; Published | August 10, 2015

*Correspondence | Ragaa Ali Othman, Assiut University, Egypt; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Othman RA, Eldeek HE, Almatary AM, Sayed AA, Alsakaf A (2015). Detection of malaria in healthy blood donors using PCR in an endemic area in Yemen. J. Adv. Parasitol. 2(2): 40-47.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jap/2015/2.2.40.47

ISSN | 2311-4096

Copyright © 2015 Othman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Introduction

 

Malaria is recognized as a serious public health problem occurring in tropical regions such as Africa, Asia, Central and South America (WHO, 2011). Malaria is transmitted not only by the bite of the female Anopheles mosquito but also by congenital transmission, by blood transfusion and the sharing of needles and syringes (Piñeros-Jiménez et al., 2011). According to the World Malaria Report published by the World Health Organization, 207 million malaria cases occurred among 3.3 billion at-risk people from 103 countries in 2012, resulting in an estimated 627,000 deaths (WHO, 2011).

 

Yemen is an Asian country where 65% of its population is at risk of malaria, with 43% at high risk (Omar et al., 2014). Plasmodium falciparum is the predominant species which is responsible for 90% of the malaria cases followed by Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium malariae (Abdulsalam et al., 2010).

 

Infected blood donors are considered a potential hazard for blood recipients. The transmission of malaria via blood transfusion is the second manner of transmission and is associated with acute manifestations (Kazemi et al., 2005). The history of transfusion-transmitted malaria dates back to 1882, when Gerhardt empirically demonstrated the transmission of malaria in humans by infected blood (King, 1938). However, the first case of accidental transmission by blood transfusion was reported in 1911 (Singh and Sehgal, 2010). The risk of transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM) has been associated with the difficulty in identifying infected potential donors, most with low numbers of parasites circulating in the blood (incomplete immunity), as well as the ability of this parasite to remain viable in stored blood bags, even after the storage process (Kitchen and Chiodini, 2006; Chattopadhyay et al., 2011). Thus, the transfusion practice constitutes a major challenge in malaria-endemic areas because many potential blood donors are infected. This situation could jeopardize the attainment of blood and blood products for transfusion demand in areas where the refusal of donation is high (Kitchen and Chiodini, 2006). Another difficulty is the lack of parasite-diagnostic methods that are sensitive, specific and easily reproducible in endemic areas and are focused on laboratory screening of blood donors (Seed et al., 2005; Noubouossie et al., 2012).

 

Microscopy is considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis although its wide application is limited (Thongdee et al., 2014). Microscopy offers significant advantages to other methods, but its limitations include detection of low parasite loads, result interpretation, mixed infections and limited usefulness in non-endemic regions due to frequently inadequate training and experience of laboratory personnel (Wilson, 2013).

 

For two decades, the sensitivity of malaria diagnostic tests has considerably been improved with the introduction of molecular assays (Canier et al., 2015). Methods based on molecular biology have been used to detect different types of Plasmodium by PCR, such as nested PCR (Batista-dos-Santos et al., 2012). The performance of nested PCR as a ma­laria diagnostic tool is excellent with respect to its high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and ability to discriminate Plasmo­dium species (Canier et al., 2015). PCR technique can detect parasites below the threshold levels of microscopy; when performed under optimal conditions, PCR can detect parasitaemia as low as 0.01-1 parasite/μL of blood (Tangpukdee et al., 2009). The results depend directly on the quality of the genetic material (DNA) of the parasite obtained during extraction and amplification as well as on the quality of the reagents, and the test requires a long analysis time. Despite the increased sensitivity, PCR has not been established as a routine diagnostic method in laboratories or blood banks (Lima et al., 2011). One limitation of the PCR-based methods is that the parasite DNA can remain in the blood stream long after infection has been cleared and therefore differentiating an active infection from a recently cleared infection is difficult (Thongdee et al., 2014). Another major limitation is the volume of blood samples collected and analysed, obviously limited in mass screening studies (usually 5-30 µL). Indeed, larger volumes of blood may allow the detection of very low parasite density, and could reveal a higher than expected proportion of malaria parasite carriers, including mixed infections (Canier et al., 2015).

 

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of nested PCR for the detection of malaria in­fection in healthy blood donors compared with light microscopy.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Study Area

The study was conducted over the period from May to November 2014 in Hadramout Governorate, the largest Yemeni governorate, accounting for half of the country’s surface area with a total population of 1,028,556 according to the last available census for the year 2004 (Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation Yemen, 2004). Hadramout is located in the east of the republic of Yemen and at 777 km from the capital Sana’a, bounded to the north by the Empty Quarter, and the middle Mahra Governorate, in the south by the Arabian Sea and to the west by Shabwa. Hadramout was selected as an endemic area for malaria in our study.

 

Blood Collection

Two millilitres of venous blood sample were collected from each of the two hundred participants who were randomly selected from blood donors presented to the blood bank at the Almukalla Hospital, Hadramout Governorate. The subjects were of both sexes and their age ranged from 20-55 years. All participants completed data forms for history of malaria infection, or fever and chills and also anti-malaria drug consumption during the last 2 years. The blood samples were collected in EDTA anticoagulant tubes. Thin and thick blood smears were prepared and sent with the stored blood samples to the Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt in order to perform the study techniques.

 

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Yemen Ministry of Public Health. Moreover, the results of examination were given to the participants, free of charge.

 

Light Microscopic Examination

All samples were air-dried, fixed in methanol and stained for 15–30 minutes in 1:10 diluted Giemsa stain (BDH Ltd); a (pH 7.2). The stain was washed off with tap water and the smears were examined by oil immersion lens×1,000 magnification by 2 independent experienced parasitologists. Thick and thin films were interpreted as negative only after examination for at least 100 oil immersion fields. Parasitaemia was determined as: No. infected RBCs ÷ Total No. RBCs counted) × 100 = Percent Infected RBCs.

 

Table 1: Primers for nested PCR of Plasmodium 18S rRNA gene

Species

Primer

Sequence 5´-3´

Size of PCR product (bp)

Plasmodium sp.

rPLU5

CCTGTTGTTGCCTTAAACTTC

1,100

rPLU6

TTAAAATTGTTGCAGTTAAAACG

P. falciparum

rFAL1

TTAAACTGGTTTGGGAAAACCAAATATATT

205

rFAL2

ACACAATGAACTCAATCATGACTACCCGTC

P. vivax

rVIV1

CGCTTCTAGCTTAATCCACATAACTGATAC

120

rVIV2

ACTTCCAAGCCGAAGCAAAGAAAGTCCTTA

 

Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (Nested PCR)

DNA extraction from EDTA blood samples was carried out using the QIAamp DNA Mini spin columns according to the manufacturer protocol (http://www.qiagen.com), quantified, and stored at -20°C. Nested PCR assay was carried out as previously described elsewhere (Snounou et al., 1993; Mekonnen et al., 2014).

 

DNA samples were amplified using both genus-specific and species-specific primers (Table 1) targeting the Plasmodium spp. 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. The primers used were manufactured in laboratories of the analysis for life invitrogen by life technologies, Texas, USA.

 

The PCR reactions were carried out in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 12.5 µL of 2x green PCR Master Mix, 200 nM primers, with 5µL of DNA solution (for the 1st round reactions) and 5 µL of the PCR products in the 2nd round, and up to 25 μL nuclease free water on a Veriti® Thermal Cycler (Life Technologies). The thermo-cycler was programmed as follows: Hot start at 95°C for 10 min; initial denaturation at 95°C for 45 sec; annealing at 58°C for1 min; extension at 72°C for 2 min. A total of 40 cycles were used followed by a final extension 72°C for 10 mins for the 1st round reactions. For the second round reaction the condition is as follows: 30 cycles of, respectively, 25 sec at 94°C for denaturation, 25 sec at 56°C for annealing temperature, and 60 sec at 72°C extension. This was followed by a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The amplified product was detected by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized on an ultraviolet trans-illuminator. Positive and negative controls were included in each run (positive controls were persons who are evident clinically and microscopically having malaria infection with high parasitaemia, while the negative controls were healthy individuals with no history of malaria, living in non-endemic areas) .

 

Data Analysis

Categorical variables were described by number and percentage (N & %), whereas continuous variables were described by mean and standard deviation (Mean ±SD). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive (NPV) and accuracy rate were calculated. All analyses were performed with the SPSS 20.0 software.

 

Results

 

A total of 200 donor samples were evaluated, all in a governorate considered endemic for malaria in Yemen. 148 of the donors were males (74%) and 52 were females (26%). Their age ranged from 20 to 55 years old with an average of 29.8±8.4. In donor samples examined by thin and thick blood films, analysis by light microscopy showed that 28(14%) were detected positive for malaria, 2 (1%) of them were identified as having only P. vivax and 26 (13%) as having only P. falciparum infections (Figures 1, 2 and 3), 172 (86%) were slide-negative.

 



There was no P. malariae or P. ovale in these specimens. The thin films showed parasitaemia ranging from 0.001% to 5%. PCR analysis for the detection of the Plasmodium genus and species determination is shown in Table 2.

 

Table 2: Comparisons between microscopic examination and PCR for detection of malaria in blood samples of 200 blood donors

Results

Microscopic examination (n=200)

PCR (n=200)

No.

%

No.

%

Positive cases

P. Falciparum

26

13

33

16.5

P. Vivax

2

1

0

0

Mixed

0

0

0

0

Negative cases

172

86

167

83.5




M: 100 bp ladder; PCR amplification product of 1100 bp was seen in all samples (lane 2-7); Lane 1: negative case control; Lane 8: positive case control; Lane 9: no template control

 

PCR detected malarial parasites in 33 samples including 5 samples that had been detected negative for malarial parasites on light microscopy. The percentages of P. vivax mono infection, P. falciparum mono infection, and mixed infections were 0 (0%), 33 (16.5%) and 0 (0%), respectively. The samples positive for P. falciparum included 7 samples from women (7/52 women) and 26 from men (26/148 men). All positive samples were within the age range of 20 to 37 years, and their average age was 26.2±3.9 (Table 3). A typical gel was shown in Figures 4 and 5. Five out of 200 specimens microscopically diagnosed as negative were positive as P. falciparum with nested PCR (Table 4). In order to ensure that the results were true and not due to technical errors such as cross-contamination, assays were all carried out with concurrent human negative controls (healthy individuals, with no history of malaria, living in non-endemic areas of the country). Sensitivity and specificity of PCR diagnosis were detected in comparison with microscopy were shown in Table 5.

Table 3: Number of samples detected by nested PCR for Plasmodium parasite according to age groups and gender

Age (year)

Negative samples (167)

Positive samples (33)

Male (122)

Female (45)

Male (26)

Female (7)

No. %

No. %

No. %

No. %

20-28*

68 55.7

26 57.8

22 84.6

5 71.4

29-37*

24 19.7

11 24.4

4 15.4

2 28.6

38-46

19 15.6

6 13.3

0 0.0

0 0.0

47-55

11 9.0

2 4.5

0 0.0

0 0.0

 

*There was significant difference in the comparison between different positive age groups (p<0.01), however, there is no significant difference relating to gender p=0.268 (p>0.05).

 

Table 4: Comparison between microscopic and PCR diagnosis in the 200 blood samples tested in the present study

PCR

Microscopy examination

P. vivax

P. falciparum

Mixed infection

Negative results

Total

P. vivax

0

2

0

0

2

P. Falciparum

0

26

0

0

26

Mixed infection

0

0

0

0

0

Negative results

0

5

0

167

172

Total

0

33

0

167

200

 

Table 5: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of PCR in relation to microscopy

Microscopic examination

+Ve

-Ve

PCR

+Ve

28

5

PPV=84.85%

-Ve

0

167

NPV=100.0%

Sensitivity = 100.0%

Specificity = 97.1%

Accuracy=97.5%

CI= (93.9:99.1)

 

PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; CI:  Confidence interval; +Ve: Positive; -Ve: Negetive

 


M: 50 bp ladder; The representative P. vivax were negative by using P. vivax specific primers lanes 1-4 (right panel) and the representative P. falciparum were positive at 205bp by using P. falciparum specific primers lanes 5-7 (left panel); Lane 8: negative case control; Lane 9: positive case control; Lane 10: no template control

 

Discussion

 

The transmission of malaria by blood transfusion was one of the first transfusion-transmitted infections recorded in the world. Transfusion-transmitted malaria may lead to serious problems because infection with P. falciparum may cause rapid death (Hassanpour et al., 2011).

 

Currently, the technique most often used in endemic areas is the gold standard of objective microscopy in thick blood smears. This technique is considered the most effective and inexpensive for the diagnosis of malaria. However, its low sensitivity and specificity in situations of low-parasite density hinder the detection of asymptomatic donors who have small amounts of parasites at the time of donation. This fact presents a transfusion risk for the recipient, and parasite detection depends on the experience of the microscopist (Singh and Sehgal, 2010; Rosanas-Urgell et al., 2010). So, there is a need for molecular methodologies based on the amplification of DNA because of its higher sensitivity for detection of picogram units of DNA.

 

The elevated malaria indexes found in endemic areas of Yemen increase the risk of blood transfusion transmission. Our results showed that there is great risk of this type of transmission, during checking 200 blood samples collected from participants who were randomly selected from blood donors at Almukalla Hospital, Hadramout Governorate, Yemen. Fourteen percent of the samples showed positivity for malaria by microscopic examination and 16.5% by using nested PCR. The comparison between the nested PCR and blood smear, which is considered the reference test for malaria detection, demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%. Other authors in different countries have reported lower sensitivity values of 96.6% (Boonma et al., 2007), 94.3% (Han et al., 2007), 99.41% (Khairnar et al., 2009) and 93.88% (Lima et al., 2011). The specificity of our results using nested PCR reached 97.1%, which is greater than some previously described values (89.4% (Boonma et al., 2007), 94.3% (Han et al., 2007), and 90.88% (Khairnar et al., 2009), but lower than Lima et al., (2011) who have reported a specificity of 100% (Lima et al., 2011).

 

A study conducted in Yemen by Saif et al. (2014) found that the total malaria cases in the blood bags in Taiz Governorate is about 8.33% by using microscopic examination and the main Plasmodium species was P. falciparum (100%), which was also the predominant species in studies conducted by Abdulsalam et al. (2010), Assabri and Muharram (2002), Azazy and Rajaa (2003), Al-Maktari et al. (2003); Bassiouni and Al-Maktari (2005), Alkadi et al. (2006) and Al-Taiar et al. (2006). More recently, Sallum et al. (2014) found that most of the subclinical infections were associated with P. falciparum. In our study we detected P. falciparum mono-infection in 13% of cases followed by mono-infection with P. vivax detected in only 1% of cases, the latter was only detected by microscopy.

 

Traditionally, P. falciparum has been thought to inhibit the parasitaemia of P. vivax (Albadr et al., 2011). Albadr et al. (2011) found that when P. vivax parasitaemia rose and no drug was administered, asexual P. falciparum parasitaemia fell to submicroscopic levels. This is somewhat surprising as previous experience showed that mixed infections tend to be interpreted as P. vivax rather than P. falciparum, obviously because of its characteristic morphology (Wang et al., 2014). The reason why microscopy failed to detect mixed infections could be due to the presence of higher numbers of parasites of one species relative to the others (Mekonnen et al., 2014). In our study no vivax malaria was detected by PCR, although there were 2 cases of vivax malaria detected by microscopy. This may be due to the fact that PCR test was not able to detect mixed infections. This could probably be due to the tendency for one species to be dominant over other species (Kimura et al., 1995; Albadr et al., 2011). This result does not agree with Jill et al. (1999) who stated that PCR could diagnose mixed infection more than microscopy. Also the recurrence of P. vivax infections cannot be theoretically predicted by PCR assays because PCR cannot detect relapses of the P. vivax hypnozoite liver stage (Kimura et al., 1995; Albadr et al., 2011). That is why the WHO recommends microscopic examination as the gold standard for the diagnosis of vivax malaria (Kim et al., 2014).

 

Although malaria affects all ages, the present study showed that all positive cases were among donors between the ages of 20 and 37. This result confirmed the greater risk of an exposure to malaria infection in adults. Also the study conducted by Abdulsalam et al. (2010) confirmed that malaria in Yemen is age dependent, identifying the younger age as a high risk group (Abdulsalam et al., 2010). This finding is concordant with previous results from Yemen and other countries (Sintasath et al., 2005; Al-Taiar et al., 2006; Bin Mohanna et al., 2007). This pattern may be the result of professional activities that foster individual exposure to the mosquito vector (Batista-dos-Santos et al., 2012). Also the bias of malaria infection to younger age group could be explained by the fact that protection against malaria may be acquired with age due to repeated exposure in endemic areas (Carneiro et al., 2010).

 

Our study also showed that malaria positive cases are gender biased, with males being more infected, although no significant difference existed between them. Similar results have been reported in Yemen (Al-Taiar et al., 2006; Abdulsalam et al., 2010), Saudi Arabia (Malik et al., 1998) and many African countries (Oduro et al., 2007).

 

Our results indicated that nested PCR is a highly sensitive method that can be helpful for the confirmation of malaria infection in different units of blood transfusion organizations especially in malaria-endemic areas where the majority of donors may be potentially infected with malaria parasites. Many authors used nested PCR as a reference standard for calculating the sensitivity, specificity, and agreement of other PCR-based assays (Thongdee et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014). Although nested PCR has been reported as a specific and sensitive diagnostic method to detect malaria, the assay is inadequate for use in a clinical setting because the turnaround time is incompatible with the urgency required to initiate treatment. However it can be a valuable tool when malaria cases with low parasitemia need to be identified as in screening blood donors in endemic areas or even monitoring malaria treatment (Kim et al., 2014).

 

This study concluded that nested PCR enabled the identification of Pfalciparum in a high proportion of clinically healthy donors, highlighting the potential risk for transfusion-transmitted malaria. Additionally, this molecular diagnostic tool can be adopted as a new laboratory screening method in haemotherapy centres, especially in malaria-endemic areas. Although, till now, the usage of PCR in Yemen is limited as a confirmatory tool for donor screening in blood banks due to cost and technical inadequacy, the test proved to be useful in screening blood donors in endemic areas which is of higher importance because of the scarce number of blood donors and the increased risk of disease transmission.

 

Authors’ contributions

 

All the authors participated in drafting and designing the manuscript. Ragaa Ali Othman, Hanan Elsayed Eldeek, Amal Mohammed Almatary and Asmaa Alsakaf performed parasitological examination while Hanan Elsayed Eldeek and Ayat Abdelrahman Sayed analysed data. All authors approved final form and additional revisions.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

 

There exisit no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

  • Abdulsalam MQ, Al-Mekhlafi1, Mohammed AK, Mahdy Ahmed A, Azazy, Fong MY (2010). Clinical situation of endemic malaria in Yemen. Trop. Biomed. 27: 551-558.
  • Albadr A, Almatary AM, Eldeek HE, Alsakaf A (2011). Comparison of PCR and SD bioline malaria antigen test for the detection of malaria in Hadramout Governorate. J. Am. Sci. 7: 772-778.
  • Alkadi HO, Al-Maktari MT, Nooman MA (2006). Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum local strain in Taiz Governorate, Republic of Yemen. Chemotherapy. 52: 166-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000093592
  • Al-Maktari MT, Bassiouny HK, Al-Hamd ZS, Assabri AM, El-Massry AG, Shatat HZ (2003). Malaria status in Al-Hodeidah Governorate, Yemen: malariometric parasitic survey & chloroquine resistance P. falciparum local strain. J. Egypy. Soc. Parasitol. 33: 361-372.
  • Al-Taiar A, Jaffar S, Assabri A, Al- Habori M, Azazy A, Al-Mahdi N, Ameen K, Greenwood BM, Whitty CJ (2006). Severe malaria in children in Yemen: two site observational study. British Med. J. 333: 827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38959.368819.BE
  • Assabri AM, Muharram AA (2002). Malaria in pregnancy in Hodiedah, Republic of Yemen. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 8: 245-253.
  • Azazy AA, Raja’a YA (2003). Malaria and intestinal parasitosis among children presenting to the paediatric centre in Sana’a, Yemen. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 9: 1048-1053.
  • Bassiouny HK, Al-Maktari MT (2005). Malaria in late pregnancy in Al Hodeidah Governorate, Yemen. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 11: 606-617.
  • Batista-dos-Santos S, Raiol M, Santos S, Cunha MG, Ribeiro-dos-Santos  (2012). Real-time PCR diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax among blood donors. Malar. J. 11: 345-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-345
  • Bin Mohanna MA, Bin Ghouth AS, Rajaa YA (2007). Malaria signs and infection rate among asymptomatic schoolchildren in Hajr Valley, Yemen. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 13: 35-40.
  • Boonma P, Christensen PR, Suwanarusk R, Price RN, Russell B, Lek-Uthai U (2007). Comparison of three molecular methods for the detection and speciation of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum. Malar. J. 6: 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-124
  • Canier L, Khim N, Kim S, Eam R, Khean C, Loch K, Ken M, Pieter Pannus P, Bosman P, Stassijns J, Nackers F, Alipon S, Char MC, Chea N, Etienne W, De Smet M, Kindermans J, Ménard D (2015). Malaria PCR detection in Cambodian low-transmission settings: dried blood spots versus venous blood samples. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 10: 4269. http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.14-0614
  • Carneiro I, Roca-Feltrer A, Griffin JT, Smith L, Tanner M, Schellenberg JA, Greenwood B, Schellenberg D (2010). Age-patterns of malaria vary with severity, transmission intensity and seasonality in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and pooled analysis. PLoS ONE. 5(2): e8988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008988
  • Chattopadhyay R, Majam VF, Kumar S (2011). Survival of Plasmodium falciparum in human blood during refrigeration. Transfusion. 51: 630-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02872.x
  • Han ET, Watanabe R, Sattabongkot J, Khuntirat B, Sirichaisinthop J, Iriko H, Jin L, Takeo S, Tsuboi T (2007). Detection of four Plasmodium species by genus- and species-specific loop-mediated isothermal amplification for clinical diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2521-2528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02117-06
  • Hassanpour G, Mohebali M, Raeisi A, Abolghasemi H, Zeraati H, Alipour M, Azizi E, Keshavarz H (2011). Detection of malaria infection in blood transfusion: a comparative study among real-time PCR, rapid diagnostic test and microscopy: sensitivity of malaria detection methods in blood transfusion. Parasitol. Res. 108: 1519-1523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2207-1
  • Jill MT, Szu HL, Theresa MC, Robert CY, Ursula AK (1999). Detection and species determination of malaria parasites by PCR: comparison with microscopy and with Para-Sight-F and ICT malaria Pf tests in a clinical environment. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 37: 1269-1273.
  • Kazemi B, Najari M, Saneimoghaddam E, Bandehpour M, Seyed N, Sharifi K (2005). Detection of Plasmodium parasites in healthy blood donors using polymerase chain reaction. Arch. Iran. Med. 8: 135-138.
  • Khairnar K, Martin D, Lau R, Ralevski F, Pillai DR (2009). Multiplex real-time quantitative PCR, microscopy and rapid diagnostic immuno-chromatographic tests for the detection of Plasmodium sp: performance, limit of detection analysis and quality assurance. Malar. J. 8: 284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-284
  • Kim J, Goo Y, Ji1 S, Shin H, Han E, Hong Y, Chung D, Cho S, Lee W (2014). Development and efficacy of real-time PCR in the diagnosis of vivax malaria using field samples in the Republic of Korea. PLoS ONE 10: 1371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105871
  • Kimura M, Miyake H, Kim HS, Tanabe M, Arai M, Kawai S, Yamane A, Wataya Y (1995). Species-specific PCR detection of malaria parasites by microtiter plate hybridization: clinical study with malaria patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33: 2342-2346.
  • King WV (1938). Historical developments and progress in our knowledge of malaria control. Southern Med. J. 31: 797-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007611-193807000-00021 OpenURL
  • Kitchen AD, Chiodini PL (2006). Malaria and blood transfusion. Vox. Sang. 90: 77-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00733.x
  • Lima GFMC, Levi JE, Geraldi MP, Sanchez MCA, Segurado AAC, Hristov AD, Inoue J, Costa-Nascimento MJ, Di Santi SM (2011). Malaria diagnosis from pooled blood samples: comparative analysis of real-time PCR, nested PCR and immunoassay as a platform for the molecular and serological diagnosis of malaria on a large-scale. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 106: 691-700. OpenURL http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762011000600008
  • Malik GM, Osheik S, Abdelmageed E, Abdin SM (1998). Clinical aspects of malaria in the Asir region, Saudi Arabia. Annal. Saudi Med. 18: 15-17.
  • Mekonnen SK, Aseffa A, Medhin G, Nega Berhe N, Velavan TP (2014). Re-evaluation of microscopy confirmed Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria by nested PCR detection in southern Ethiopia. Malar. J. 13: 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-48
  • Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation Yemen: National Census of Yemen 2004.
  • Noubouossie D, Tagny CT, Same-Ekobo A, Mbanya D (2012). Asymptomatic carriage of malaria parasites in blood donors in Yaoundé. Transf. Med. 22: 63-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01121.x
  • Oduro AR, Koram KA, Rogers W, Atuguba F, Ansah P, Anyorigiya T, Ansah A, Anto F, Mensah N, Hodgson A, Nkrumah F (2007). Severe falciparum malaria in young children of the Kassena-Nankana district of northern Ghana. Malar. J. 6: 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-96
  • Omar AA Bamaga, Mohammed AK Mahdy, Mahmud R and AL Lim Y (2014). Malaria in Hadhramout, a southeast province of Yemen: prevalence, risk factors, knowledge, attitude and practices (KAPs). Parasit. Vector. 7: 351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-351
  • Piñeros-Jiménez JG, Álvarez G, Tobón A, Arboleda M, Carrero S, Blair S (2011). Congenital malaria in Urabá, Colombia. Malar. J. 10: 239-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-239
  • Rosanas-Urgell A, Mueller D, Betuela I, Barnadas C, Iga J, Zimmerman PA, Del Portillo HA, Siba P, Mueller I, Felger I (2010). Comparison of diagnostic methods for the detection and quantification of the four sympatric Plasmodium species in field samples from Papua New Guinea. Malar. J. 9: 361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-361
  • Saif NA, Alhweesh M, Al-harazi T, Alkadasi M, Zaid A (2014). Diagnostic study on plasmodium in blood bags at Taiz City, Yemen. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 3: 635-643.
  • Sallum MA, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Laporta GZ, Ferreira-da-Cruz MF, Maselli LM, Levy D, Bydlowski SP (2014). Finding connections in the unexpected detection of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum DNA in asymptomatic blood donors: a fact in the Atlantic Forest. Malar. J. 13: 337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-337
  • Seed CR, Kitchen A, Davies TM (2005). The current status and potential role of laboratory testing to prevent transfusion-transmitted malaria. Transf. Med. Rev. 19: 229-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2005.02.004
  • Singh G, Sehgal R (2010). Transfusion-transmitted parasitic infections. Asian J. Transfus Sci. 4: 73-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.67018
  • Sintasath DM, Ghebremeskel T, Lynch M, Kleinau E, Bretas G, Shililu J, Brantly E, Graves PM, Beier JC (2005). Malaria prevalence and associated risk factors in Eritrea. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72: 682-687.
  • Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN (1993). Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 58: 283–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-6851(93)90050-8
  • Tangpukdee N, Duangdee C, Wilairatana P, Krudsood S (2009). Malaria diagnosis: a brief review. Korean J. Parasitol. 47: 93-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2009.47.2.93
  • Thongdee P, Chaijaroenkul W, Kuesap J, Na-Bangchang K (2014). Nested-PCR and a new ELISA-based NovaLisa test kit for malaria diagnosis in an endemic area of Thailand. Korean J. Parasitol. 52: 377-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2014.52.4.377
  • Wang B, Han S, Cho C, Jin-Hee Han J, Cheng Y, Lee S, Galappaththy G, Thimasarn K, Soe MT, Oo HW, Kyaw MP, Hana E (2014). Comparison of microscopy, Nested-PCR, and real-time PCR assays using high-throughput screening of pooled samples for diagnosis of malaria in asymptomatic carriers from areas of endemicity in Myanmar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52: 1838-1845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03615-13
  • Wilson ML (2013). Laboratory diagnosis of malaria (conventional and rapid diagnostic methods). Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 137: 805-811. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2011-0602-RA
  • World Health Organization (2011). Global Malaria Programme. World Malaria report.
  •  

     

     

     

     

    The Journal of Advances in Parasitology

    December

    JAP Vol. 10, Pages 1-29

    Featuring

    Click here for more

    Subscribe Today

    Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


    Subscribe Unsubscribe