Research Article

 

Use of Quorum Sensing Gene SdiA as a Molecular Marker for Salmonella Diagnosis

 

Shaymaa Abdelmalek1, Esraa Abdulmaged Elshafiee2, Wafy Hamed3, Mona Kadry2*

1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; 2Department of Zoonosis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; 3Medical Laboratory Specialist, Quesna, Menofiea, Egypt.

 

Received | September 14, 2020; Accepted | December 03, 2020; Published | December 05, 2020

*Correspondence | Mona Kadry, Department of Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Box 12211, Giza, PO, Egypt; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Abdelmalek S, Elshafiee EA, Hamed W, Kadry M (2021). Use of quorum sensing gene SdiA as a molecular marker for Salmonella diagnosis. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 9(1): 15-20.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.1.15.20

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

Copyright © 2021 Abdelmalek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Salmonella spp. are gram-negative bacilli spread among domestic and wild animals and humans that cause severe illnesses, such as diarrhoea, fever and general fatigue (Baired-Parker, 1990). Salmonella spp. are a major food-borne pathogen in animals and humans (Humphery, 2002). Hence, rapid detection of Salmonella in clinical samples, foodstuffs and water is critical for prompt and accurate diagnosis of Salmonella, which in turn helps in control and prevention of the disease. Molecular diagnosis by using PCR assay is more accurate and reliable technique for the detection of pathogens. Interestingly, several PCR techniques have been developed for detection of numerous genes in Salmonella, for example (Rahn et al., 1992), agfA (Doran et al., 1993), hilA and sirA (Guo et al., 2000) 16S rRNA (Iida et al., 1993), viaB (Hashimoto et al., 1995), and ttr (Malorny et al., 2004). However, the invA gene is the most commonly used for the diagnosis of Salmonella due to it has unique DNA sequences (Hara-Kudo et al., 2005; Abdel-Aziz, 2016). The majority of Salmonella spp., except S. litchfield and S. Senftenberg, are found to harbour invA gene. In the invasion-associated protein secretion mechanism, the invA gene encodes an essential compound (Gala’n et al., 1992). Besides, the invA gene has been found to be located in region that constitutes a pathogenicity island –PAI-, and it is in some Salmonella serotypes unstable, such as S. litchfield and S. Senftenberg (Ginocchio et al., 1997).

 

Although, in the past, many researches have revealed that most of the bacteria use several quorum-sensing systems, but the biological significance of this phenomenon remains unknown. Bacterial cells are able to modify the gene expression pathway in response to extracellular signals. In contrast, certain bacteria that can release and detect signalling compounds to control gene expression using quorum sensing were first detected in marine Vibrio fischeri (Nealson and Hasting, 1979). Quorum sensing is the communication phenomenon between bacteria, and it controls cellular aggregation-dependent factors, such as antibiotic production, invasion of host cells and biofilm formation (Wei and Zhao, 2018). The bacteria secrete acyl homoserine lactone (AHL), which is a species-specific autoinducer-1 (AI-1). AI-1 is an extracellular signalling molecule that is responsible for the activation of quorum sensing (Zhang and Li, 2016). Gene transcription, which is regulated by the regulatory gene sdiA (LuxR family), is induced as soon as the threshold level is reached.. The sdiA gene of Salmonella (LuxR family) regulates the intestinal survival, colonization and invasion (pathogenicity) of Salmonella (Ahmer, 2004). Host entrance and adherence to intestinal mucosa are important for Salmonella pathogenicity in cell invasion. There are interacting signals between Salmonella and the host. These signals lead to changes in ruffling of the membrane and the entry of Salmonella (Gala’n, 1995). Therefore, the development of a molecular marker for Salmonella spp. detection is very important.

 

The aim of the current study was to examine the possibility of using the sdiA gene as a molecular marker for diagnosis of local Egyptian Salmonella strains recovered from different sources, including human stool, foodstuffs, and carriers gathered from the Cairo, Giza and Menofeia governorates. Moreover, sequencing of the sdiA gene was used to detect the epidemiological link between the different Egyptian Salmonella isolates.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 

Bacterial isolates

Twenty-eight local Egyptian Salmonella isolates from the Cairo, Giza and Menoufia governorates were collected from different sources, such as 75 human stool from clinically affected persons tested by the Widal test, 35 Egyptian stork (major Salmonella carriers) and 30 from multilayer electric grills, grilled chicken. All strains of Salmonella were characterized culturally, biochemically, serologically and molecularly by using a PCR assay for the invA gene as previously studied by (Abdelmalek et al., 2019), as it is the most common PCR assay for Salmonella isolate identification,. Four Local non-Salmonella bacterial isolates were used as negative controls for the sdiA gene as follows: E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. They were local isolates and were identified culturally, biochemically and molecularly.

 

The extraction of DNA

On nutrient agar medium (SIGMA), the local Salmonella isolates were grown, and the bacterial cells were harvested from the culture plates using a sterile cotton swab placed in an Eppendorf tube containing 1X PBSS. [1X phosphate buffered saline prepared by dissolving one tablet in 100 ml of distilled water (SIGMA)], and mixed well. The specimens were then centrifuged for 5 min at 9000 x g (washing was repeated three times with PBS) and then washed once with sterile distilled deionized water. Then, at 9000 x g for 5 min, centrifugation was performed and the supernatant was extracted. Subsequently, 100 μl of sterile deionized distilled water was suspended in the bacterial pellet. The samples were put in a heat block (Grant-Bio, England) for 5 min at 100OC and then cooled in ice water immediately. The specimen had been centrifuged, (Wang et al., 1996).

 

PCR amplification and electrophoresis

In a 25 μl reaction mixture containing 12.5- μl of 2X master mix - (EmeraldAmpGT, A2201-1, TAKARA, Japan), 0.5 μl (25 pmol) of each primer (sdiA F and R), 2 - μl of the extracted DNA and 9.5 - μl of free water from nuclease (Thermo Science, # R0581, USA), PCR amplification was performed.

 

The cyclic program consisted of denaturation for 5 min at 94oC, followed by 30 cycles of 94oC for 30 s, 52oC for 40 s and 72oC for 0.5 min. Then, final extension at 72oC for 7 min was carried out (Halasti et al., 2006). In electrophoresis using 1.5 percent (w/v) agarose gels (SERVA, Russia), all reaction products in 1X TAE running buffer (SERVA, Russia) were analyzed at 100 V for 30 minuts and imaged using a Spectroline UV transilluminator (Slimline Series, USA).

 

DNA sequencing

The amplified fragments of sdiA gene in the five selected Salmonella isolates that randomly selected from grilled chicken, human and stork in the same locality were sent to be sequenced at the Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI) in Dokki- El Giza . Using the GeneJET PCR Purification Kit ( Thermo Scientific), the PCR products were purified and a DNA sequencer was used to make the sequencing. The Large Dye Terminator (V3.1 Cycle) Sequencing Kit was used to perform the sequencing step, (Applied Biosystems). The gene sequences have been submitted in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database by using BankIT tool under the accession numbers MF942870, MF942871, MF942872, MF942873, MF942874 for the human stool, stork and grilled chicken-derived sequences, respectively.

 

The sequences obtained were determined by a BLAST analysis with GenBank (NCBI). To determine the relationship of our gene sequences recovered from various sources, phylogenetic tree analysis was used and related sdiA gene sequences obtained from the GenBank database. For Clustral W- multiple alignment, BioEdit software was used, and MEGA7 software was used using the maximum likelihood approach for the construction of phylogeny.

 

RESULTS

 

PCR results

All local Egyptian Salmonella isolates were PCR-positive for the sdiA quorum sensing gene (274-bp PCR product). The local non-Salmonella isolates E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. vulgaris and P. aeruginosa were PCR-negative for the sdiA gene (Figure 1).

 

 

Table 1: Oligonucleotide sequence of the quorum sensing sdiA gene.

 

Gene	Sequence	Product	Ref.
sdiA F:	5-AAT ATC GCT TCG TAC CAC-3	274 bp	(Halatsi et al., 2006)
sdiA R:	5-GTA GGT AAA CGA GGA GCA G-3

 

Sequencing results

In this analysis, the representative sequences were deposited under accession numbers MF942870, MF942871, MF942872, MF942873, and MF942874 for the human stool, stork and grilled chicken-derived sequences, respectively into the GenBank database. The sdiA gene nucleotide sequence data available in GenBank were selected based on the criteria of the available information regarding the source, location and year of isolation (Table 2). The five amplified sdiA gene PCR products were sequenced and matched with the other associated GenBank NCBI-BLAST gene sequences of sdiA.The ≤ 99% similarity to the sdiA gene of Salmonella enterica strains showed that the primers included here exclusively amplifies the 274 bp fragment of the target gene. The phylogenetic analysis results of 5 Salmonella enterica isolates based on sdiA gene sequences are shown in Figure 2. Initially, the sdiA gene sequences of these isolates were compared to those published in GenBank for Salmonella enterica strains (Table 2).

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

Salmonella is a very significant food-borne pathogen that causes many public health problems. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is crucial for the detection of Salmonella spp. Molecular diagnosis is more reliable and accurate for pathogen diagnosis than other methods.

 

Table 2: Isolation source, location and accession no. of Salmonella spp.

 

Sample no.	Serotype	Isolation source	Location	Accession no.
1	Salmonella Heidelberg	Environmental sample	USA	KJT28859
2	Salmonella Enteritidis	Human	USA	ELN95470
3	Salmonella Infantis	Food sample	Portugal	KNB29764
4	Salmonella Heidelberg	Chicken breast	USA	EYH81042
5	Salmonella Infantis	Human	USA	EHB41363
6	Salmonella Enteritidis	Chicken breast	USA	ELO07807
7	Salmonella Heidelberg	Human	USA	KDS05771
8	Salmonella enteric	Bostourus (faecal sample)	USA	ETC75075
9	Salmonella Typhimurium	Chicken meat	Brazil	ONF85490
10	Salmonella enteric	Dry milk	London	ESJ59077
11	Salmonella Bareilly	Food sample	USA	KFT86086
12*	Salmonella Typhimurium	Human stool	Egypt	MF942870
13*	Salmonella Typhimurium	Stork (carrier)	Egypt	MF942871
14*	Salmonella Typhimurium	Grilled chicken	Egypt	MF942872
15*	Salmonella Typhimurium	Grilled chicken	Egypt	MF942873
16*	Salmonella Typhimurium	Grilled chicken	Egypt	MF942874

*Gene sequences enrolled in our study.

 

Many Salmonella studies have been focused on the invA gene in different sources; including, animals and humans from different serotypes (Herbert and Hensel, 2004).

 

Recently, quorum sensing is an essential regulator of bacterial pathogenicity, particularly in Salmonella (Gala’n, 1995; Halasti et al., 2006). The detailed mechanism is still unknown. The sdiA gene is a type of Salmonella regulatory receptor (LuxR family) that is present in the centrosome 42 region (far from the centrosome 63 region of the invA gene) and it does not regulate the virulence-associated secretion mechanism but does regulate essential factors that control intestinal survival and colonization. Until now, the sdiA gene has been shown to initiate genes that help only one of the Salmonella bacteria adhere to the intestinal mucosa (Ahmer, 2004). In the present study, the sdiA gene was examined as a molecular marker for diagnosis of local Egyptian Salmonella isolates from different sources, and compared with non-Salmonella local isolates E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. vulgaris and P. aeruginosa (Figure 1). Based on the aforementioned data, this study proved that the sdiA gene is highly specific for Salmonella spp. and could be used as a molecular marker for Salmonella diagnosis (Halasti et al., 2006).

 

DNA sequencing was accomplished to confirm that sdiA gene is a conserved gene in salmonella spp., and predict the epidemiological relationships between our study sequences and related sdiA gene sequences from the available GenBank NCBI-BLAST database. Among the study sequences, there was more than 99 percent matches to sdiA gene sequences of different serotypes of Salmonella enterica strains existing in the GenBank database. These results suggest that the SdiA gene is conserved among Salmonella enterica strains regardless of their serotypes. Previous studies supported this suggestion by sequencing and analysing phylogenetic trees based on the sdiA gene (Herbert and Hensel, 2004; Campos-Galvão et al., 2015). Phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences revealed the existence of two major clusters (C1 and C2) according to the geographical isolation with high bootstrap support value. These geographical clusters may be due to the sdiA gene partial sequence data and are scarce in Africa and the Middle East. Therefore, our study sequence isolates from Egypt with accession numbers MF942870, MF942871, MF942872, MF942873, and MF942874 are located on the same cluster (C2) and show no homology with other sdiA-related sequences (Figure 2). The majority of the sdiA gene data available in GenBank are from the USA and Latin America (Table 2). Egyptian isolates with the same serotype (Salmonella typhimurium) were divided into 2 subclusters (SC1 and SC2) with high bootstrap support values. SC1 shows that the study sequences of stork (wild bird) (MF942871) and the grilled chicken (MF942874) are highly similar to each other, which reflects the potential role of wild birds in the indirect transmission of Salmonella to humans through foodstuffs. This scenario spotlights on the public health implication of the distribution of wild birds, for example, storks, near restaurants in Egypt. Epidemiologically, wild birds that are attracted to human sewage outfalls may disseminate Salmonella to susceptible individuals through faecal shedding and shared environments and via direct contact (Afema and Sischo, 2016; Ahmed et al., 2019). In addition, we cannot deny the role of infected humans in the contamination of ready to eat food, and similar strains of Salmonella typhimurium were found in human stool (MF942870) and grilled chicken (MF942872, MF942873), as shown in SC2 (Figure 2). This finding confirmed that cooks or food handlers who do not follow proper personal hygiene procedures may act as potential sources of recontamination of food after cooking.

 

Table 3: the different serotypes of the salmonella isolates.

 

Isolates/ numbers	Serotypes	No. (%)
Human/ 7	S. Typhimurium	3 (42.8)
	S. Enteritidis	1 (14.3)
	S. Virchow	1 (14.3)
	S. Haifa	1 (14.3)
	S. Kentucky	1 (14.3)
carriers stroke/ 10	S. Typhimurium	10 (100)
grilled chicken/ 11	S. Typhimurium	10 (100)

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

The authors are thankful to the Department of Zoonoses and the Department of Microbiololgy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt for providing necessary facilities for this study. The authors did not receive any fund for this study.

 

Author’s Contribution

 

Shaymaa Abdelmalek, Esraa Abdulmaged.Elshafiee,Wafy Hamed, Mona Kadry contributed to the collection of samples, isolation of strains, performing the molecular detection of target genes, analysis and interpretation of the data as well as writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

 

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES

 

• Abdel-Aziz NM (2016). Detection of Salmonella species in chicken carcasses using genus-specific primer belong to invA gene in Sohag city, Egypt. Vet. World, 9(10): 1125-1128. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.1125-1128

• Abdelmalek S, Kadry M, Elshafiee EA, Hamed W, Moussa IM, Al-Maary KS, Mubarak AS, Hemeg HA, Elbehiry A (2019). Occurrence of Salmonella infection and antimicrobial susceptibility for local Salmonella isolates from different sources in a cross-sectional study. Ital. J. Food Safe., 8: 8525. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2019.8525

• Afema JA, Sischo WM (2016). Salmonella in wild birds utilizing protected and human impacted habitats. Uganda EcoHealth, 13: 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-016-1149-1

• Ahmed ZS, Elshafiee EA, Khalefa HS, Kadry M, Hamza D (2019). Evidence of colistin resistance genes (mcr-1 and mcr-2) in wild birds and its public health implication in Egypt. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Contr., 8: 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0657-5

• Ahmer BM (2004). Cell-to-cell signalling in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol., 52: 933–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04054.x

• Baired-Parker AC (1990). Food borne salmonellosis. Lancet, 336: 1231-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(90)92844-8

• Campos-Galvão MEM, Leite TDS, Ribon AOB. Araújo EF, Vanetti MCD (2015). A new repertoire of informations about the quorum sensing system in Salmonella enteric serovar Enteritidis PT4. Genet. Mol. Res., 14: 4068-4084. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.April.27.22

• Doran JL, Collinson SK, Burian J, Sarlós G, Todd EC, Munro CK, Kay CM, Banser PA, Peterkin PI, Kay WW (1993). DNA-based diagnostic test for Salmonella species targeting agfA, the Structural gene for thin aggregative fimbriae. J. Clin. Microbiol., l31: 2263–2273. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.31.9.2263-2273.1993

• Gala’n JE (1995). Molecular and cellular bases of Salmonella entry into non-phagocytic cells. Curr. Top MicrobiolImmunol., 209: 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85216-9_3

• Gala’n JE, Ginocchio C, Costeas P (1992). Molecular and functional characterization of the Salmonella typhimurium invasion gene invA: homology of InvA to members of a new protein family. J. Bacteriol., 17: 4338–4349. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.174.13.4338-4349.1992

• Ginocchio CC, Rahn K, Clarke RC, Galan JE (1997). Naturally occurring deletions in the centisome 63 pathogenicity island of environmental isolates of Salmonella spp. Infect. Immun., 65: 1267–1272. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.65.4.1267-1272.1997

• Guo X, Chen J, Beuchat LR, Brackett RE (2000). PCR detection of Salmonella enterica Serotype Montevideo in and on raw tomatoes using primers derived from hilA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66: 5248–5252. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.12.5248-5252.2000

• Halasti K, Oikonomou L, Lambiri M, Mandilara G, Vatopoulos A, Kyriacou A (2006). PCR detection of Salmonella spp. using primers targeting the quorum sensing genesdiA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 259: 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00266.x

• Hara-Kudo Y, Yoshino M, Kojima T, Ikedo M (2005). Loop mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid detection of Salmonella. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 253: 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.032

• Hashimoto Y, Itho Y, Fujinaga Y, Khan AQ, Sultana F, Miyake M, Hirose K, Yamamoto H, Ezaki T (1995). Development of nested PCR based on the ViaB sequence to detect Salmonella typhi. J. Clin. Microbiol., 33: 775–777. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.33.3.775-777.1995

• Herbert S, Hensel M (2004). Pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenesis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 17: 14–56. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.1.14-56.2004

• Humphery T (2000). Public health aspects of Salmonella infection. Salmonella Domest. Anim., (Way C and Way A, eds). pp. 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851992617.0245

• Iida K, Abe A, Matsui H, Danbara H, Wakayama S, Kawahara K (1993). Rapid and sensitive method for detection of Salmonella strains using combination of polymerase chain reaction and reverse dot-blot hybridization. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 114: 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb06568.x

• Malorny B, Paccassoni E, Fach P, Bunge C, Martin A, Helmuth R (2004). Diagnostic real-time PCR for detection of Salmonella in food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70: 7046–7052. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.12.7046-7052.2004

• Nealson KH, Hasting JW (1979). Bacterial bioluminescence: Its control and ecological significance. Microbiol. Rev., 43: 496-518. https://doi.org/10.1128/MR.43.4.496-518.1979

• Rahn K, De Grandis SA, Clarke RC, McEwen SA, Galán JE, Ginocchio C, Curtiss R, Gyles CL (1992). Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. Mol. Cell. Probes., 6: 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-8508(92)90002-F

• Wang RF, Cao WW, Cerniglia CE (1996). PCR detection and quantitation of predominant anaerobic bacteria in human and animal fecal samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62: 1242–1247. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.62.4.1242-1247.1996

• Wei CJ, Zhao XH (2018). Induction of Viable but Nonculturable Escherichia coli O157: H7 by Low Temperature and Its Resuscitation. Front. Microbiol., 9: 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02728

• Zhang WW, Li CH (2016). Exploiting quorum sensing interfering strategies in gram-negative bacteria for the enhancement of environmental applications. Front. Microbiol., 6: 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01535