Research Article

 

Rapid Detection of Enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Raw Cow Milk in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt

 

Sally H. Abou-Khadra1*, Ibrahim M. El-Shorbagy2, Mona M. El-Azzouny1

1Microbiology Unit, Animal Health Research Institute(AHRI), Zagazig branch, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt; 2Food Hygiene Unit, Animal Health Research Institute(AHRI), Dokii, Giza, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

 

Received | June 10, 2020; Accepted | June 25, 2020; Published | July 12, 2020

*Correspondence | .Sally H. Abou-Khadra; Microbiology Unit, Animal Health Research Institute(AHRI), Zagazig branch, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt; Email: [email protected], sallylab85@gmail

Citation | Abou-Khadra SH, El-Shorbagy IM, El-Azzouny MM (2020). Rapid detection of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw cow milk in Sharkia governorate, Egypt. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 8(s1): 11-17.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.s1.11.17

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

Copyright © 2020 Abou-Khadra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Introduction

 

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) has emerged as one of the most important pathogens over the past several decades. It is considered a leading cause of food-poisoning outbreaks and contagious bovine mastitis (Guven et al., 2010; El-Jakee et al., 2013). Milk is regarded as a suitable medium for its growth, where potential contamination occurs during processing stages (Asao et al., 2003; Le Loir et al., 2003; Brasca et al., 2005; Jørgensen et al., 2005).

 

The leading cause of raw milk contamination with S. aureus is the dairy cows. These are mainly the cows that suffer from subclinical mastitis, and therefore had the potential to disseminate this microbe intomilk (Da Silva et al., 2005). The success of this pathogen for producing toxin is ascribed to its potential virulence, where, with the emergence of multi-drug resistance (MDR), it has proven remarkable ability to overcome most of the antibiotics developed in the recent years (Diep et al., 2008). Infection caused by antibiotic resistant strains such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is considered severe threat to the healthcare system worldwide, mainly due to ease in its spread and the dif­ficulties inpatient treatment. This is primarily due to the dissemination of determinants that encode resistance to antimicro­bial drugs (Witte, 1999). There were five classes of SE types were previously identified (SEA, SEB, SEC, SED and SEE) (Bergdoll, 1983).

 

In the 1990s, sequence analyses discovered further “new” Se genes These are Sek, Sel, Sem, Sen, Seo, Sep, Seq, Ser, and Seu; however, their importance in food poisoning has not been explicated (Morandi et al., 2007; Boynukara et al., 2008; Rall et al., 2008).

 

Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) proteins are about 26.900 - 29.600 Kilo Dalton, These are resistant to heat and the pro­teolytic enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract (Martın et al., 2004). These are not affected by pasteurization, For instance, Staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA) keeps some activity even after exposure to heat at 121°C for 28 min (Rall et al., 2008). A consumption of staphylococcal enterotoxin SEA is the most frequent cause of food poisoning (Stewart, 2003), and several outbreaks are attributed accordingly (Asao et al., 2003). It is the leading cause of staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks in the developed countries where it represents about 75% of outbreaks followed by SED, SEB, and SEC (Normanno et al., 2005).

 

Multiplex PCR is required for the simultaneous identification of S. aureus enterotoxin genes. However, gene existence does not confirm the enterotoxigenic properties of a strain. Therefore, an expression of the gene also should be measured (Van Belkum, 2003).

 

Recently enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were employed for direct detection of SE in food. However, these methods are time consuming and do involve a high cost. On the other hand, reverse passive latex agglutination (SET-RPLA) is considered the best method for the identification of SE in bacterial culture (Morandi et al., 2007) that can detect enterotoxin protein using specific antibodies (Sergeev et al., 2004). The present work aimed to identify enterotoxin genes Ses (Sea, Seb, Sec, Sed and See) among multidrug-resistant S. aureus strains using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and SEs protein production using the RPLA technique.

 

Material and Methods

 

Sampling

During the period from March to October 2018, one hundred raw milk samples were randomly collected from farms in Sharkia Governorates, Egypt. Milk samples were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 minutes, and the sediment was used for bacteriological cultivation.

 

Bacteriological examination

All samples were subjected to the routine preliminary phenotypic characterization of S. aureus isolates on the basis of standard microbiological techniques (Baird,1996).

 

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the S. aureus isolates against a panel of 9 antimicrobial agents was tested by the Kirby-Bauer standard agar disk diffusion technique as described earlier (Bauer, 1966). The tested antibiotics and their concentrations in μg/disc included clindamycin (DA; 2 μg), tetra­cycline (TE; 30), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5μg), oxacillin (OX; 1μg), vancomycin (VA; 30 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC; 20/10 μg), amoxicillin (Ax; 10 μg), ampicillin (AM; 10 μg) and gentamycin (CN; 10 μg) (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK). Inhibition zone, (mm) was measured in duplicate and scored in accordance with the critical breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2014). All S. aureus colonies were screened for methicillin resistance using oxacillin.

 

Multiplex PCR for the detection of enterotoxin genes

A total of ten S. aureus isolates were used for genome extraction that showed the highest multidrug-resistant. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH). Briefly, 200 µl of the sample suspension was incubated with 10 µl of proteinase K and 200 µl of lysis buffer at 56oC for 10 min. After incubation, 200 µl of 100% ethanol was added to the lysate. The sample was then washed and centrifuged following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Nucleic acid was eluted with 100 µl of elution buffer. The primer sequences, their corresponding genes and the respective molecular sizes of PCR amplified products are listed in Table 1. PCR amplification reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing 12.5 μL of DreamTaq TM Green Master Mix (2X) (Fermentas, Inc. Hanover, USA), 0.1 μL of 100 pmol of each primer (SigmaAldrich, Co., St. Louis, USA), and 2 μL of S. aureus DNA template. The volume of the reaction mixture was completed to 25 μL using DNase/RNase-free water. The cycling condition was carried out using a PTC-100 TM programmable thermal cycler (MJ Research Inc., Waltham, USA). PCR was performed with an initial denaturation at 94˚C /5 min, followed by 35 cycles of each of 94°C for 30 sec, 57°C for 40 sec, and 72°C for 40 sec, and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C (Mehrotra et al., 2000).

 

PCR product analysis

The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel (Applichem, Germany, GmbH) in 1x TBE (Tris-borate-EDTA) buffer at room temperature using gradients of 5V/cm. The fragment sizes of PCR products were determined with a 100 bp DNA ladder (Qiagen, Germany), photographed, and the data was analyzed through computer software.

 

Staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) detection by the RPLA method

The detection of enterotoxin production (SEA, SEB, SEC, SED) from broth cultures of S. aureus isolates were detected by commercially available kit (SET-RPLA,TD 900, Oxoid, UK) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

 

Table 1: Primers sequences, target genes, amplicon sizes and cycling conditions.

 

Target gene	Primers sequences	Amplicon size (bp)
Sea	GGTTATCAATGTGCGGGTGG	102
	CGGCACTTTTTTCTCTTCGG
Seb	GTATGGTGGTGTAACTGAGC	164
	CCAAATAGTGACGAGTTAGG
Sec	AGATGAAGTAGTTGATGTGTATGG	451
	CACACTTTTAGAATCAACCG
Sed	CCAATAATAGGAGAAAATAAAAG	278
	ATTGGTATTTTTTTTCGTTC
See	AGGTTTTTTCACAGGTCATCC	209
	CTTTTTTTTCTTCGGTCAATC

 

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using the statistical package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 22. The chi-square test was used at a 5% significance level.

 

Results

 

Occurrence and distribution of S. aureus among the examined samples

Out of 100 raw milk samples, 30 of them (30%) were positive for Staphylococcus spp. However, the coagulase test illustrated only 20 isolates (20 %) were coagulase positive (S. aureus) and, therefore, considered as pathogenic strains.

 

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of all coagulase positive (S. aureus) isolates are illustrated in Figure 1. Analysis of methicillin resistance confirmed that all the recovered isolates were MRSA. All tested MRSA isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin (100%) and vancomycin (96%). However, higher frequency levels of resistance were obtained for ampicillin (95%), followed by amoxicillin (90%) clindamycin (80%). All the isolates were considered resistant to three or more of the antimicrobial agents of three different groups and therefore taken as multiple drug resistance (MDR).

 

S. aureus enterotoxigenic genes

S. aureus isolates from raw milk samples were examined by multiplex PCR, where ten isolates showed their genomic potential to produce enterotoxin genes, as shown in Table 2 and Figure 2. All isolates produced the Sed enterotoxin gene followed by Sea and See at percentages of 70% and 50%, respectively. On the other hand, seven strains had Sea and Sed enterotoxin genes, three isolates harbored Sea, See and Sed enterotoxin genes, and two isolates had gene corresponding to Sed and See enterotoxin genes. Seb and Sec genes were not detected in any of the study isolates.

 

Table 2: Multiplex-PCR and SET-RPLA results for detection of some S. aureus enterotoxins in raw cow milk.

 

IsolatesNo.	Enterotoxin genotyping pattern	Enterotoxin proteina (SET-RPLA)	Antibiotic resistant patternb
1	Sea, Sed, See	SEA, SED	OXA-AM-DA-AX
2	Sea, Sed, See	SEA, SED	OXA-AM-TE-AX
3	Sea, Sed, See	SEA, SED	OXA- AM-CN-AX
4	Sed	SEA, SED	OXA-AM-AX
5	Sea, Sed	SED	OXA-AM-DA-TE
6	Sed, See	SEA, SED	OXA-AM-DA-CN-AX
7	Sea, Sed	SED	OXA-AM-DA-AX
8	Sed, See	SEE, SED	OXA-AM-DA-TE-AX
9	Sea, Sed	SEA, SED	OXA-AX-DA-CN
10	Sea, Sed	SED	OXA-AX-DA-CN

 

aall S.aureus enterotoxin proteins significantly associated with S.aureus enterotoxin genes except SEE protein that was non significantly associated with See gene (P=0.068). bDA: clindamycin, TE: tetra­cycline, CIP: ciprofloxacin,OX: oxacillin ,AMC: amoxicillin/clavulinic acid, Ax: amoxicillin, AM: ampicillin , CN: gentamycin.

 

 

S. aureus enterotoxigenic protein

Enterotoxins, extracted from 10 enterotoxigenic S. aureus broth culture, revealed varying results. All isolates produced SED, six strains produced SEA, while none of the strains produced SEB and SEC. Six isolates produced SEA in combination with SED (Table 2). Interestingly, except for SEE, which was not found associated with See gene (P=0.068), we found that all S. aureus enterotoxin proteins were significantly associated with S. aureus enterotoxin genes (P= 0.014).This can be evidenced in Table 2, where isolates No.4 and No.6 produced SEA enterotoxin, while the encoding gene was not detected by multiplex PCR. On the other hand, enterotoxin proteins (SEE) was not produced, whereas, it’s See gene was detected by multiplex PCR (Figure 3).

 

 

 

 

Discussion

 

Cli­nically, S. aureus is one of the most significant bacteria that cause food poising worldwide. In this study,20% of raw milk samples from Sharkia Governorate were found contaminated with S. aureus. This rate of prevalence has previously been documented by a number of other studies (Ekici et al., 2004; Santana et al., 2010; Tambekar and Bhutda, 2010; Ammar et al., 2016). They found analyzed samples contaminated with S. aureus in a varying rate of percentages that ranged from 17.34% to 18.80%. Some other studies reported significantly higher levels of contamination ranging from 40% to 61.7 % (Guven et al., 2010; Lingathurai and Vellathurai, 2010; Zakary et al., 2011). Similarly, other studies reported low contamination from 6.2% to 7.3% (Fagundes et al., 2010; Thaker et al., 2013). This is not surprising because milk can be contaminated internally through the production of milk from a diseased animal or externally by an infected person or the surrounding envi­ronment (Serraino et al., 2004).

 

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. aureus against nine different antibiotics showed higher sensitivity rates to ciprofloxacin and vancomycin. These observations are in accordance with those stated previously by others (Aydin et al., 2011). The highest resistance rates were observed for ampicillin, amoxicillin, clindamycin, and gentamycin.With a negligible difference, these observations correlate with those reported previously by others (De Oliveira et al., 2000; Guérin-Faublée et al., 2003; Ammar et al., 2016).

 

All S. aureus isolates were completely resistant to oxacillin (100%), which contradicts previous findings (Thaker et al., 2013), who found only 20% of S. aureus isolates resistant to oxacillin. High percent isolation of MRSA in this study was considered an extension of previous studies conducted by other researcher groups in Egypt (Ammar et al., 2016) and Bangladesh (Nusrat et al., 2015).

 

Our findings showed that all the isolates were resistant to at least three antibiotics which is not consistence to previously reported result (Ombui et al., 2000) and contradict several studies which found high levels of MDR in MRSA isolates (Kérouanton et al., 2007; Ge et al., 2017; Sahibzada et al., 2017; Abdi et al., 2018; Suleiman et al., 2018).

 

S. aureus has the ability to produce enterotoxins that make the potential risk to public health. Our results demonstrated the detection of Sed (100%) gene among all tested S. aureus isolates from raw milk followed by Sea (70%) and See (50%). Sec or Seb genes were not detected in examined isolates. Similar findings were documented previously by others (Carfora et al., 2015).

 

In another study, a frequent occurrence of See gene was detected in all isolates of SE (100%) followed by a similar presence of Seb and Sec (33.3%), while none of the isolatehadSea or Sed genes (Mansour et al., 2017). Another study revealed Sea gene the most frequent one (61.8%) followed by See (33.1%), Sed (17.5%), Sec (15.9%), and Seb (13.9%) in the S. aureus (Mathenge et al., 2015). We found a significant association between Sea and Sed enterotoxin genes, which is in agreement with findings reported previously (Serraino et al., 2004; Normanno et al., 2005; Morandi et al., 2007).

 

Multiplex PCR assay can identify the presence of enterotoxin genes but didn’t evaluate their expression. Therefore, in this study, we compared the multiplex PCR results and RPLA (SEA- SED) for toxin type. The RPLA is usually used as a qualitative assessment for S. aureus enterotoxin with a sensitivity of 0.25–0.5 ng/mL concentration of toxins in examined solutions (Rose et al., 1989; Cretenet et al., 2011).

 

We found that the frequency of SEA and SED enterotoxins were inconsistent with their corresponding genes. Previous studies indicated SEA as the top contributor (80%) to staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks, followed by SEE, SED, SEB, and SEC. On the contrary, some researchers found a higher expression of SEC and SEB than SED and SEA (Mathenge et al., 2015).

 

Varying results among PCR and RPLA are not surprising because similar observation for both assays has previously been documented. For instance, a <5% difference in the results of the RPLA and the PCR assays were observed already by others (Jørgensen et al., 2005; Pinto et al., 2005). Ranging from 15 to 32%, marked discrepancies in results of multiplex PCR and RPLA assays, especially for SEA, have been reported (Zouharova and Rysanek, 2008). Such a discrepancy could be explained by the production of enterotoxin in a quantity that was below the detection limit of the RPLA test.

 

The RPLA results detected some enterotoxin proteins; however, their enterotoxin genes were not detected by multiplex PCR for the same isolate. This finding is in agreement with the observations illustrated previously (Mansour et al., 2017).

 

Two strains produced SEA enterotoxin, while its encoding gene was not detected using multiplex PCR. Our findings were justified by others (Fraser and Proft, 2008; Argudín et al., 2010) who reported that, though genes more commonly found in groups, enterotoxin genes may found alone, in the large mobile segments of DNA called mobile genetic elements (MGEs) such as transposons, S. aureus pathogenicity islands (SaPIs), plasmids, prophases and the enterotoxin gene clusters (egc).

 

Conclusion

 

This study reported that SED and SEA are common enterotoxins in S. aureus isolates originating from raw milk samples. Therefore, the consumption of raw milk should be considered a potential public health hazard. Rapid and efficient detection of enterotoxigenic S. aureus is necessary for consumer safety, and RPLA is recommended for the detection of S. aureus enterotoxin. As presence of enterotoxin genes in S. aureus isolates not mean production of enterotoxin proteins.

 

Acknowledgments

 

We thank Animal Health Research Institute, Egypt, for providing the technical support for this study.

 

Authors Contribution

 

All authors contributed equally to this work.

 

Conflict of interests

 

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

 

Reference

 

• Abdi RD, Gillespie BE, Vaughn J, Merrill C, Headrick SI, Ensermu DB, D’souza DH, Agga GE, Almeidaand RA, Oliver SP (2018). Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from dairy cows and genetic diversity of resistant isolates. Foodborne Pathog. Dis., 15(7): 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2017.2362

• Ammar A, Attia A, El-Aziz NA, El Hamidand MA, El-Demerdash A (2016). Class 1 integron and associated gene cassettes mediating multiple-drug resistance in some food borne pathogens. Int. Food Res. J. 23(1): 332.

• Argudín MÁ, Mendozaand MC, Rodicio MR (2010). Food poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Toxins. 2(7): 1751-1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2071751

• Asao T, Kumeda Y, Kawai T, Shibata T, Oda H, Haruki K, Nakazawa H, Kozaki S (2003). An extensive outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning due to low-fat milk in Japan: estimation of enterotoxin A in the incriminated milk and powdered skim milk. Epidemiol. Infect. 130(1): 33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268802007951

• Aydin A, Muratoglu K, Sudagidan M, Bostan K, Okuklu B, Harsa S (2011). Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of foodborne Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Turkey. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 8(1): 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0613

• Baird D (1996). Staphylococcus: Cluster forming gram positive cocci. Chapter 11. In: Mackie and McCartney Prac.Med. Microbiol. 2(14): 245–261.

• Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Amer. J. Clin. Pathol. 45(4): 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493

• Bergdoll MS (1983). Enterotoxins. Staphylococci and Staphyloococcal Infections. pp. 559.

• Boynukara B, Gulhan T, Alisarli M, Gurturk K, Solmaz H (2008). Classical enterotoxigenic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in Van, Turkey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 125(2): 209-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.024

• Brasca M, Morandi S, Vanoni L, Colombo L, Lodi R (2005). The influence of different cultural conditions on the development and toxinogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus [milk; cheese; Lombardy]. Scienza e Tecnica Lattiero Casearia (Italy).

• Carfora VA Caprioli, Marri N, Sagrafoli D, Boselli C, Giacinti G, Giangolini G, Sorbara L, Dottarelli S, Battisti A (2015). Enterotoxin genes, enterotoxin production, and methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk and dairy products in Central Italy. Int. Dairy J. 42: 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.10.009

• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI (2014). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fourth informational supplement, CLSI document M100-S24, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA. 34(1): 134-136.

• Cretenet M, Even S, Le Loir Y (2011). Unveiling Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin production in dairy products: a review of recent advances to face new challenges. Dairy Sci. Technol. 91(2): 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-011-0014-9

• Da Silva ER, Do Carmo LS, Da Silva N (2005). Detection of the enterotoxins A, B, and C genes in Staphylococcus aureus from goat and bovine mastitis in Brazilian dairy herds. Vet. Microbiol. 106(1-2): 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.12.005

• De Oliveira A, Watts J, Salmon S, Aarestrup FM (2000). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Europe and the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 83(4): 855-862. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74949-6

• Diep BA, Chambers HF, Graber CJ, Szumowski JD, Miller LG, Han LL, Chen JH, Lin F, Lin J, Phan TH (2008). Emergence of multidrug-resistant, community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300 in men who have sex with men. Ann. Int. Med. 148(4): 249-257. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00204

• Ekici K, Bozkurt H, Isleyici O (2004). Isolation of some pathogens from raw milk of different milch animals. Pak. J. Nutr. 3(4): 161-162. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2004.161.162

• El-Jakee JK, Aref NE, Gomaa A, El-Hariri MD, Galal HM, Omar SA, Samir A (2013). Emerging of coagulase negative staphylococci as a cause of mastitis in dairy animals: An environmental hazard. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 1(2): 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2013.05.006

• Fagundes H, Barchesi L, Nader Filho A, Ferreira LM, Oliveira CAF (2010). Occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in raw milk produced in dairy farms in São Paulo state, Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 41(2): 376-380. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000200018

• Fraser JD, Proft T (2008). The bacterial superantigen and superantigen‐like proteins. Immunol. Rev. 225(1): 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00681.x

• Ge B, Mukherjee S, Hsu CH, Davis JA, Tran TTT, Yang Q, Abbott JW, Ayers SL, Young SR, Crarey ET (2017). MRSA and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in US retail meats, 2010–2011. Food Microbiol. 62: 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.029

• Guérin-Faublée V, Carret G, Houffschmitt P (2003). In vitro activity of 10 antimicrobial agents against bacteria isolated from cows with clinical mastitis. Vet. Rec. 152(15): 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.152.15.466

• Guven K, Mutlu M, Gulbandilar A, Cakir P (2010). Occurrence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat and dairy products consumed in Turkey. J. Food Saf. (30): 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2009.00200.x

• Jørgensen H, Mørk T, Høgåsen H, Rørvik L (2005). Enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in bulk milk in Norway. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99(1): 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02569.x

• Kérouanton A, Hennekinne J, Letertre C, Petit L, Chesneau O, Brisabois A, De Buyser M (2007). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with food poisoning outbreaks in France. Inter. J. Food Microbiol. 115(3): 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.050

• Le Loir Y, Baron F, Gautier M (2003). Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genet. Mol. Res. 2(1): 63-76.

• Lingathurai S, Vellathurai P (2010). Bacteriological quality and safety of raw cow milk in Madurai, South India.

• Mansour AS, Wagih GES, Morgan SD, Elhariri M, El-Shabrawy MA, Abuelnaga AS, Elgabry E (2017). Detection of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxigenic strains in bovine raw milk by reversed passive latex agglutination and multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Vet. World. 10(8): 843. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.843-847

• Martın M, Fueyo J, González-Hevia M, Mendoza (2004). Genetic procedures MC for identification of enterotoxigenic strains of Staphylococcus aureus from three food poisoning outbreaks. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 94(3): 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.01.011

• Mathenge J, Okemo P, Ng’ang’a P, Mbaria J, Gicheru M (2015). Identification of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus strains from meat and dairy products by multiplex PCR and reverse passive latex agglutination test in Nairobi, Kenya. Medical, 97.

• Mehrotra M, Wangand G, Johnson WM (2000). Multiplex PCR for detection of genes forStaphylococcus aureus enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, and methicillin resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38(3): 1032-1035. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.3.1032-1035.2000

• Morandi S, Brasca M, Lodi R, Cremonesi P, Castiglioni B (2007). Detection of classical enterotoxins and identification of enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus from milk and dairy products. Vet. Microbiol. 124(1-2): 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.03.014

• Normanno G, Firinu A, Virgilio S, Mula G, Dambrosio A, Poggiu A, Decastelli L, Mioni R, Sucuota S, Bolzoni G, Di Giannatale E, Salinetti AP, La Salandra G, Bartoli M, Zuccon F, Pirino T, Sias S, Parisi A, Quaglia NC, Celano GV (2005). Coagulase-positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus in foods products marketed in Italy. Food Microbiol. 98: 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.008

• Nusrat J, Ifra T, Mrityunjoy A (2015). Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus within raw milk and cheese samples. Inter. Food Res. J. 22(6): 2629-33.

• Ombui J, Kimotho A, Nduhiu J (2000). Antimicrobial resistance patterns and plasmid profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk and meat. East Afri. Med. J. 77(9): 463-467. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v77i9.46688

• Pinto B, Chenoll E, Aznar R (2005). Identification and typing of food-borne Staphylococcus aureus by PCR-based techniques. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 28(4): 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2005.01.002

• Rall V, Vieira F, Rall R, Vieitis R, Fernandes Jr A, Candeias J, Cardoso K, Araújo Jr J (2008). PCR detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from raw and pasteurized milk. Vet. Microbiol. 132(3-4): 408-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.05.011

• Rose SA, Bankes P, Stringer M (1989). Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins in dairy products by the reversed passive latex agglutination (SET-RPLA) kit. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 8(1): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(89)90081-0

• Sahibzada S, Abraham S, Coombs G, Pang S, Hernández-Jover M, Jordan D, Heller J (2017). Transmission of highly virulent community-associated MRSA ST93 and livestock-associated MRSA ST398 between humans and pigs in Australia. Sci. Rep. 7(1): 5273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04789-0

• Santana EHW, Cunha MDLRD, Oliveira TCRMD, Moraes LB, Aragon-Alegro LC, Beloti V (2010). Assessment of the risk of raw milk consumption related to staphylococcal food poisoning. Ciência Anim. Brasileira. (11): 643-652. https://doi.org/10.5216/cab.v11i3.5751

• Sergeev N, Volokhov D, Chizhikov V, Rasooly A (2004). Simultaneous analysis of multiple staphylococcal enterotoxin genes by an oligonucleotide microarray assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42(5): 2134-2143. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.5.2134-2143.2004

• Serraino A, Alberghini L, Cristina FM, Annemüller C, Lämmler C, Rosmini R (2004). Occurrence of enterotoxin genes and macrorestriction analysis of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis and bulk-tank milk samples in Italy. An epidemiological study. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 3(1): 47-53. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2004.47

• Stewart C (2003). Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal enterotoxins. Foodborne Microorg. Pub. Health Signi. 6: 359-379.

• Suleiman T, Karimuribo E, Mdegela R (2018). Prevalence of bovine subclinical mastitis and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of major mastitis pathogens isolated in Unguja island of Zanzibar, Tanzania. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 50(2): 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1424-3

• Tambekar D, Bhutda S (2010). Prevalence of Bacterial Pathogens in Pedha(A Milk Product) Sold in Amravati(India). Int. J. Dairy Sci. 5(3): 173-176. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijds.2010.173.176

• Thaker H, Brahmbhatt M, Nayak J, Thaker HC (2013). Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus from milk and milk products and their drug resistance patterns in Anand, Gujarat. Vet. World. 6(1): 10-13. https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2013.10-13

• Van Belkum A (2003). Molecular diagnostics in medical microbiology Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 3(5): 497–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-4892(03)00108-5

• Witte W (1999). Antibiotic resistance in gram-positive bacteria: epidemiological aspects. J. Antimicrob. Chemothera. 44(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/44.suppl_1.1

• Zakary EM, Nassif MZ, Mohammed G (2011). Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in bovine milk and its product by real time PCR assay. Glob. J. Biotechnol. Biochem. 6(4): 171-177.

• Zouharova M, Rysanek D (2008). Multiplex PCR and RPLA Identification of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxigenic strains from bulk tank milk. Zoonoses Pub. Health. 55(6): 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01134.x