ResearchersLinks

Short Communication · Volume 52, Issue 1, 21 November 2019 · Open Access

The Antioxidant Status of Serum and Egg Yolk in Layer Fed with Mushroom Stembase (Flammulina velutipes)

· · · · ·

Affiliations & Notes ⌄
  1. 1School of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin, P.R. China. 2Department of Animal Nutrition, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh. 3College of Chinese Medicine Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin, P.R. China. 4Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Changchun 130118, China. , * Corresponding author: songhuisk@jlau.edu.cn
Article Info ⌄
Journal:
Pakistan Journal of Zoology
Published:
21 November 2019

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant properties of serum and egg yolk in ISA Brown layer hens fed with mushroom (Flammulina velutipes) stembase (FVS). A total 150 hens of 30 wk old were grouped into 5 equal treatments with 5 replications of 6 hens each. Dietary treatments included basal diet as a control group; control diet including antibiotic (0.05% flavomycin) as an antibiotic group; 2% FVS fed group; 4% FVS fed group and 6%FVS fed group. The experimental duration was total 63 days, from 30 wk to 39 wk. Serum total antioxidant (T-AOC) was significantly higher (P<0.05) in 6%FVS than control; glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) was significantly higher (P<0.05) in FVS fed groups and control groups than in the antibiotic fed group; Malondialdehyde (MDA) was significantly lower (P<0.05) in FVS fed groups and antibiotic groups than in the control fed group. However, there was no significant difference were observed for serum total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) in among experimental groups. Yolk antioxidant T-AOC and T-SOD were significantly higher (P<0.05) in 4%FVS than the control group and antibiotic fed groups; MDA was significantly lower (P<0.05) in FVS fed groups than antibiotic group and control fed groups. Mushroom stembase can be used as a dietary supplement at 6% level to improve the antioxidant capacity of serum and egg yolk in ISA Brown laying hens.

Materials and methods

Experimental chickens (ISA Brown) were purchased from Changchun Octavia farms and F. velutipes stembase (FVS) was collected from the local domestic mushroom farm in Changchun city, Jilin, China.

A single factor completely randomized design was used to select 150 healthy, 210-day-old ISA brown laying hens and were randomly divided into 5 groups. Each group had 5 replicates and each had 6 hens. The control group was fed the basal diet, the antibiotic group was fed with the basal diet with the addition of antibiotic, (flavomycin, 0.05%) and the 2%FVS, 4%FVS and 6%FVS fed groups were added with 2%, 4%, and 6% of the ground mushroom stembase on the basal diet. The experimental period is 63 days. The basal dietary nutrition level of laying hens is based on the nutritional requirements of laying hens in the NRC (1994). Feeds and water were provided ad libitum in the whole trial period. The hen house temperature was 240C and a 17 h light with 7 h dark period was maintained throughout the whole experimental period.

The mushroom stembase sample was prepared (0.01mm) by laboratory high speed universal sample grinder (Huanghua xinxing electric Appliance Co, Hebei, China). Six representative samples in triplicate were obtained and analyzed for proximate components dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), ether extract (EE), total minerals (Ash) including calcium and phosphorus following the method of AOAC. Nitrogen was determined using an FP-528 nitrogen determinator (LECO Corporation, USA). Total phenolics content was measured according to the method of Giannenas et al. (2010). The value was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram of dry weight (mg GAE/g) on dry weight) basis. The analyzed nutritional composition of the experimental diets and FVS were presented in Table I and Table II, respectively.

At the end of the experiment at d 273 (39 wk), blood samples were obtained via wing vein from 5 hens per experimental group. Serum was obtained by centrifuged at 3000 × g for 20 min at 4oC (Legend Micro 17R centrifuge, Thermo Fisher, Germany) and were stored at -80oC until measuring serum antioxidant properties. Similarly, at the end of the experimental period at d 273(39 wk), fresh eggs were selected (5 eggs per treatment) and egg yolks were collected for the test. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content, total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) activity, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity, and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) in serum and egg yolk were measured using commercial kits provided by Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China (MDA A003-1, T-SOD A001-1, GSH-Px A005,T-AOC A015-3).

Table I.- The ingredients and chemical composition of experimental diets (g/kg).

Ingredients

Control

Antibiotic

2% FVS

4% FVS

6% FVS

Maize corn

577.0

576.5

562.0

545.0

533.0

Soyabean meal

263.0

263.0

259.0

258.0

254.0

Soyabean oil

31.0

31.0

30.0

28.0

24.0

FVW a

-

-

20.0

40.0

60.0

Lysine

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Methionine

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

Dicalcium

30.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

30.0

Limestone

92.0

92.0

92.0

92.0

92.0

Common salt

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

Vit -mineral premix b

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

Antibiotics

-

0.5

-

-

-

Total

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

Chemical analysisc

DM, (g/kg)

912.4

921.2

923.3

923.5

924.10

CP (g/kg)

168.3

168.0

169.1

168.8

169.3

Ca, (g/kg)

40.6

40.40

41.11

41.0

40.6

P, (g/kg)

7.10

7.05

7.15

7.20

7.20

EE, (g/kg)

51.4

52.1

52.10

51.30

51.60

CF, (g/kg)

25.6

25.5

29.60

33.7

37.90

Calculated analysis

ME (MJ/kg)

11.55

11.50

11.61

11.59

11.64

Lysine,(g/kg )

10.4

10.4

10.30

10.5

10.4

Methionine, (g/kg)

5.0

4.9

5.0

4.8

4.9

Cystine (g/kg)

2.6

2.6

2.7

2.5

2.6

a FVS= F. velutipes stembase at 2%, 4% and 6%. bProvided per kg of the complete diet: retinyl acetate, 4500 IU; cholecalciferol, 1200 IU; DL-α-tocopheryl acetate, 25000 IU; thiamin, 5000 mg; riboflavin, 20000 mg; phylloquinone,10000 mg; niacin, 45000 mg; pantothenic acid, 35000 mg; biotin, 1500 mg; folic acid, 3000 mg; cyanocobalamin, 40 mg; zinc, 45 mg; manganese 50 mg; iron, 30 mg; copper, 4 mg; cobalt, 120 μg; iodine, 1 mg; selenium, 120 μg. cDM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; EE, crude fat; CF, crude fiber; ME, metabolisable energy.

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SPSS 15.0. The results were expressed as the mean plus SEM value (standard error), and each set of data was processed using Duncan’s multiple comparison method.

Results and discussion

Serum antioxidant T-AOC was significantly higher (P<0.05) in 6%FVS than control; GSH-Px was significantly higher (P<0.05) in all levels of mushroom fed groups and control groups than antibiotic fed groups; MDA was significantly lower (P<0.05) in all levels of mushroom fed groups and antibiotic groups than control fed groups. However, there was no significant difference were observed for T-SOD among experimental groups (Table III).

Table II.- Chemical compositions and active ingredients of F. velutipes mushroom stem base (FVS).1

Chemical composition and active ingredients

Value

Moisture (g/kg)

116.0 ±0.85

Crude protein (CP, %Nx6.25) (g/kg)

137.5±0.75

Crude fiber (CF) (g/kg)

22.05±0.11

Ether extract (EE) (g/kg)

28.0±0.01

Ash (total minerals) (g/kg)

116.1±0.09

Organic matter (OM) (g/kg)

884.0±0.85

Nitrogen free extract (NFE) (g/kg)

498.0±3.45

Calcium (ca) (g/kg)

1.8±0.14

Available phosphorus (p) (g/kg)

6.4±0.28

Total phenolic content (mg, GAE/g)

6.87±0.25

1Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=6).

For yolk antioxidant T-AOC, and T-SOD were significantly higher (P<0.05) in 4%FVS than the control group and antibiotic fed groups; MDA was significantly lower (P<0.05) in all levels of mushroom fed groups than antibiotic group and control fed groups (Table IV).

This study assumed that mushroom contains different bioactive components especially phenolic compound, the amino acids that may role on improving the antioxidant capacity. The phenolics compounds, has the antioxidants activities, was discovered from the mushroom F. velutipes . The various proportion of F. velutipes mushroom has been reported as a potential source of antioxidants . Form some past studies it has been known that the polysaccharides and oligosaccharide present in F. velutipes mushroom shows the antioxidant function ; . Liu et al. (2016) reported that different polysaccharides originated from F. velutipes mushroom residue were purified and the antioxidant function has been considered in the study. Zeng et al. (2012) stated that F. velutipes mushroom holds the higher phenolic with the highest antioxidant activities. Besides, F. velutipes mushroom was found to exhibit vitamin-C that may play a role in antioxidant function . In a recent study by Han et al. (2017) found that dietary inclusion of yeast selenium and selenite could improve the activity of glutathione peroxidase in serum, and improve the activity of superoxide dismutase in the liver in chicken. Adding polyphenols in feed could increase the activity of glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase in serum and improve the total antioxidant capacity of serum in weaned pigs . In addition, adding L- arginine in the diet of laying hens could improve the total antioxidant capacity and reduce the concentration of malondialdehyde in egg yolk and serum .

Tables III.- Effects of mushroom stembase on serum antioxidant in layer.

Parameters

Control

Antibiotic

2%FVS

4%FVS

6%FVS

SEM

P value

T-AOC

0.71a

1.14bc

1.45bc

1.33b

1.95c

0.124

0.01

MDA

19.71c

10.53a

15.36b

15.6b

13.62b

0.847

0.03

T-SOD

64.23

67.03

74.47

70.97

75.17

1.924

0.56

GSH-Px

878.68b

683.6a

767.21ab

865.57b

832.78b

22.984

0.01

T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; MDA, malondialdehyde; T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase. 1data represent the mean value of 5 samples for each treatment (n=5). a, b,c means in the same row with different letters are significantly different at P<0.05. SEM, pooled standard error of the means.

Tables IV.- Effects mushroom stembase on egg yolk antioxidant in layer.

Parameters

Control

Antibiotic

2%FVS

4%FVS

6%FVS

SEM

P value

T-AOC

1.16a

1.15a

1.17a

1.74b

1.44a

0.074

0.02

MDA

18.11b

18.16b

14.83a

13.09a

13.71a

0.611

0.01

T-SOD

41.74a

42.79ab

51.98ab

58.11b

47.69ab

2.386

0.01

T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; MDA, malondialdehyde; T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase. 1data represent the mean value of 5 samples for each treatment (n=5). a, b,means in the same row with different letters are significantly different at P<0.05. SEM, pooled standard error of the means.

Conclusion

The present study explored that FVS could be a good source of natural feed supplement as well as antioxidant that can improve both serum and yolk antioxidant properties. Focus on quality eggs production and sound health status, F. velutipes mushroom stem base can be used as a natural supplement as well as a substitute for antibiotic on layer production.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by “Innovation Platform for Economic Fungi in Jilin Province” [Grant No. 2014-2016] Changchun, P.R. China.

Statement of conflicts of interest

Authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beluhan, S. and Ranogajec, A., 2011. Fd. Chem., 124: 1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.081[CrossRef]
  2. Chen, J., Yan, Li.,Yu, B., Chen, D., Mao, X., Zheng, P., Luo, J., and He, J., 2018. J. Anim. Sci., 96: 1108-1118. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skx078[CrossRef]
  3. Duan, X.X., Li, F., Mou, S.Y., Feng, J.W., Liu, P.F. and Xu, L.M., 2015. Poult. Sci., 94: 2938-2943. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev283[CrossRef]
  4. Giannenas, I., Tontis, D., Tsalie, E., Chronis, EF., Doukas, D. and Kyriazakis, I., 2010. Resh. Vet. Sci., 89: 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.003[CrossRef]
  5. Han, X.J., Qin, P., Li, X.W., Ma, Q.G., Ji, C., Zhang, J.Y. and Zhao, H.L., 2017. Poult. Sci., 96: 3973-3980. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex216[CrossRef]
  6. Kamran, S., Khushi, M. and Rubina, N., 2016. Pakistan J. Zool., 48: 1715-1719.
  7. Kim, M.Y., Chuang, L.M., Lee, S.J., Ahn, J.K. and Kim, E.H., 2009. Fd. Chem., 113:386-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.045[CrossRef]
  8. Liu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, J. and Xie, Z., 2014. Int. J. BioMacromol., 65: 446-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.01.062[CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y., Zhang, B., Ibrahim, S., Gao, SS., Yang, H. and Huang, W., 2016. Carbohydrate polymers., 145:71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.020[CrossRef]
  10. Ma, Z., Zhang, C., Gao, X., Cui, F. and Zhang, J., 2015. Int. J. BioMacromol., 73: 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.028[CrossRef]
  11. Mahfuz, S., Hui, S. and Zhongjun, L., 2017. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 16: 112-117. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.112.117[CrossRef]
  12. Metin, D., Asuman, A.D., Köksal, K., Ecevit, E., Harun, C. and Mohammad, M.T., 2017. Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 129-137.
  13. Moncol, J., 2007. Int. J. Biol. Cell Biol., 39: 44-84.
  14. Mujahid, A., Akiba, Y. and Toyomizu, M., 2007. Poult. Sci., 86: 264-371. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.2.364[CrossRef]
  15. National Research Council, NRC., 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
  16. Rahman, K., 2007. Studies on free radicals, antioxidants, and co-factors. Clin. Interv. Aging., 2: 219-236.
  17. Rahman, M.A., Abdullah, N. and Aminudin, N., 2015. Oxid. Med. Cell. Long., 10: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/403023[CrossRef]
  18. Rautou, P.E., Mansouri, A., Lebrec, D., Durand, F., Valla, D. and Moreau, R., 2010. J. Hepatol,. 53:1123-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.006[CrossRef]
  19. Reis, F.S., Barros, L. and Martins, A., 2012. Fd Chem. Toxicol., 50: 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.10.056[CrossRef]
  20. Ser, H.L., Tan, L.T.H. and Palanisamy, U.D., 2016. Front. Microbiol.,7: 899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00899[CrossRef]
  21. SPSS, 15.0., 2006. Statistical software package for the social sciences SPSS, Int., USA.
  22. Tang, C., Hoo, P.C.X., Tan, L.T.H., Pusparajah, P., Khan. T.M., Lee, L.H., Goh, B.H. and Chan, KG., 2016. Front. Pharmacol.,7: 474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00474[CrossRef]
  23. Xia, Z., 2015. Carbohyd. Polym, 118: 41-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.074[CrossRef]
  24. Yang, W., Yu, J., Zhao, L., Ma, N. and Fang, Y., 2015. J. Funct. Fds, 18: 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.08.003[CrossRef]
  25. Zeng, X., Suwandi, J., Fuller, J., Doronila, A. and Ng, K., 2012. Fd. Sci. Technol. Int.,18: 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013211427993[CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, X., Yang, Z. B., Yang, W. R., Wang, Y., Jiang, S.Z. and Zhang, G.G., 2011. Poult. Sci., 90: 1720-1727. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01280[CrossRef]

Cited by 1 article

In journals published by ResearchersLinks.

  1. Effect of Bee Pollen Supplemented Diet on Performance, Egg Quality Traits and some Serum Parameters of Laying HensPakistan Journal of Zoology · 2020

Services

Article usage statistics

Loading…