Current study was aimed to determine the prevalence of parasitic infection in vegetables collected from the vegetable markets in Lower and Upper Dir districts. A total of 520 vegetable samples were collected during April to October 2016. These vegetable samples were screened for parasitic contamination. The results showed that 10.7% of the vegetables were found to be contaminated with one or more than one species of parasites. Intestinal parasites Ascaris lumbricoides 26.7%, Trichuris trichura 19.6%, Taenia saginata 25 % and Entamoeba histolytica cyst 28.5% were detected. The highest prevalence was recorded for Entamoeba histolytica while Trichuris trichura was detected as the least parasitic infection. Coriandrum annum (Coriander) was found highly contaminated 14.2% with parasitic infection while Zingiber officinale (Ginger) with least 1.78%. The vegetable collected from lower Dir were highly infected 41(73.2) than the upper Dir district 15(26.7). Based on the results of the present study it was suggested that vegetables are the possible source of transmission of intestinal parasites.
Short Communication · Volume 49, Issue 3, 26 May 2017 · Open Access
Parasitic Contamination of Fresh Vegetables Sold at Upper and Lower Dir Districts, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
· · ·
Affiliations & Notes ⌄
- 1Department of Zoology, University of Malakand, Lower Dir, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan , * Corresponding author: walikhan.pk@gmail.com
Article Info ⌄
- Journal:
- Pakistan Journal of Zoology
- Published:
- 26 May 2017

From the article
- Furthermore, the rate of contamination in fresh vegetables examined in vegetable market, Lower Dir district was much higher (73.3 %) compared to that of Upper Dir district (26.7%) (Table I).
- No significant difference was found amongst the vegetables and that of the parasitic infection (Table II).
- Eggs of 4 different species of parasites namely A. lumbricoides, E. histolytica, T.saginata, T. trichura, were detected in the vegetables examined during this study.
- Fresh vegetables in Dir districts were moderately contaminated by intestinal parasites, which are source of infection with amoebiasis, ascariasis, taeniasis, trichuriasis and others.
Selected from the article's own text.
Abstract
Materials and methods
A total of 520 fresh vegetable samples were collected randomly from two main vegetable markets one each in Lower (320 samples) and in Upper Dir (200 samples) districts. The vegetables are brought from different farms and agricultural fields of Malakand division, where majority of the farmers use human and animal manures to extend the commercially processed fertilizer to limit their cost of farming.
The vegetable samples collected for this study were Solanum tuberosum (potato), Zingiber officinale (ginger), Allium cepa (onion), Brassica compastris (mustard), Abelmoschus esculanta (lady finger), Colocasia esculenta (taro), Coriandrum annum (coriander), Allium sativum (garlic), Spinacia oleracea (spinach), Lycopersicum esculentum (tomato), Capsicum annum (chilli), Daucus carota (carrot) and Cucumis sativus (cucumber). Each sample were washed in formalin for the removal of the parasite ova, larva or cysts. The suspension was strained through a cheese cloth to remove undesirable materials. A drop of the pellet was placed on a clean slide and examined under the microscope using 10X and 40X objectives. For the confirmation of the parasite the sedimentation and floatation methods were applied . About 200g of each vegetable were washed with distilled water in a plastic container. The filtrate was decanted into a beaker while the remains were sediment in the bottom of the container. A drop of the sediments was examined under the microscope to investigate parasite stages. Similarly, the suspension was shaking with a glass rod for 5 min and added Sodium chloride and zinc sulfate regularly. After the regular shaking the supernatant layer was formed, a slide was taken on the upper surface of the tube and left it for 5 min, the slide was observed under the microscope for parasite evidence. The floatation fluid was examined under microscope using 10X and 40X objectives. The eggs/cysts were identified based on morphological details with the help of keys provided by Soulsby (1982).
Data analysis was performed using the Graph Pad Prism 5. One way analysis of variance ANOVA was used to find out the association between the acquisition of parasitic infection in fresh vegetables and type of parasites and to check the significance between the type of contaminated parasite and type of vegetable. The p value <0.005 was considered as significant.
Table I.- Prevalence rate of intestinal parasitic contamination in different fresh vegetables among the two major markets in Lower and Upper Dir districts (April to October 2016).
| Type of vegetable | Vegetable market in Lower Dir | Vegetable market in Upper Dir | Total examined | Total contaminated (Infection %) | ||
| No.of examined | No. of positive (%) | No. of examined | No.of positive (%) | |||
| Solanum tuberosum (Potato) | 29 | 3 | 19 | 1 | 48 | 4 (7.14) |
| Allium sativum (Garlic) | 26 | 4 | 18 | 2 | 44 | 6 (10.7) |
| Zingiber officinale (Ginger) | 22 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 41 | 1(1.78) |
| Allium cepa (Onion) | 18 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 33 | 3(5.35) |
| Daucuscarota (Carrot) | 31 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 43 | 4(7.14) |
| Colocaciaesculenta (Taro) | 23 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 31 | 7(12.5) |
| Brassica compestriss (Mustard) | 27 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 44 | 4(7.14) |
| Coriandrum annum (Coriander) | 25 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 38 | 8(14.2) |
| Spinacia oleracea (Spinach) | 24 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 38 | 5(8.92) |
| Lycopersicum esculentum (Tomato) | 30 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 47 | 5(8.92) |
| Capsicum annum (Chili) | 23 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 38 | 2(3.57) |
| Cucumis sativus (Cucumber) | 16 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 32 | 3(5.35) |
| Abelmoschus esculantum (Lady finger) | 26 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 43 | 4(7.14) |
| Total | 320 | 41(73.2) | 200 | 15(26.7) | 520 | 56(100) |
Results and discussion
Protozoan cysts and helminth eggs were detected in 10.7% (n=56/520) of fresh vegetables examined (Table I). Interestingly, the most detected parasites in the vegetable samples in both markets were E. histolytica / dispar (28.5 %), A. lumbricoides (26.7 %), T. saginata (25%) and T. trichura (19.6 %) (Table II). The most contaminated vegetable was coriander (14.2 %) followed by taro (12.5%) and least number of parasites was detected in cucumber (1.78 %) (Table I). Furthermore, the rate of contamination in fresh vegetables examined in vegetable market, Lower Dir district was much higher (73.3 %) compared to that of Upper Dir district (26.7%) (Table I). No significant difference was found amongst the vegetables and that of the parasitic infection (Table II).
The daily consumed vegetables have been reported to be frequently contaminated with different protozoan and helminth parasites throughout the world ; . By comparing this result with other studies, it was lower than many studies done in Syria , Iran ; , Pakistan , Ethiopia ; ; , Egypt ; , Nigeria ; ; , Vietnam and Nigeria . The variation in degree of contaminations may be attributed to geographical location, type and number of samples examined, methods used for detection, different laboratory techniques used, type of water used for irrigation, post harvesting handling methods of such vegetables and even the type of water used to wash vegetables can play an instrumental role in the epidemiology of transmission of parasitic diseases.
Eggs of 4 different species of parasites namely A. lumbricoides, E. histolytica, T.saginata, T. trichura, were detected in the vegetables examined during this study. In present study the most detected parasite was E. histolytica/ dispar in fresh vegetable samples, and this result is in accordance with study conducted by Mohamed et al. (2016) and Benti and Gemechu (2014). Zingiber officinale (Ginger) and chili cucumber were found with least parasitic contamination, while Ul-Haq et al. (2014) found that cayenne pepper was less contaminated by parasitic contaminations in Lahore, Pakistan.
Table II.- Distribution of intestinal parasites in relation to the type of fresh vegetable samples collected from both the markets (April to October 2016).
| Vegetables | Taenia saginata | Ascaris lumbricoides | Entamoeba histolytica | Trichuris trichuira | Total | P Value |
| Leafy (n=120) | ||||||
| Brassica compestriss (Mustard) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4(7.14) | 0.2437 |
| Coriandrum annum (Coriander) | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8(14.2) | |
| Spinacia oleracea (Spinach) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5(8.92) | |
| Sub-total | 4 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 17(30.3) | |
| Mean ± SD | 1.3± 0.5 | 2.33±1.52 | 0.66±0.5 | 1.3±0.57 | 5.6±2.0 | |
| Root (n=240) | ||||||
| Solanum tuberosum (Potato) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4(7.14) | 0.2970 |
| Zingiber officinale (Ginger) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1(1.78) | |
| Allium sativum (Garlic) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6(10.7) | |
| Colocaciaesculenta (Taro) | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7(12.5) | |
| Daucuscarota (Carrot) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4(7.14) | |
| Allium cepa (Onion) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3(5.35) | |
| Sub-total | 7 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 25(44.6) | |
| Mean ± SD | 1.1±0.9 | 1±0.89 | 1.5±1.0 | 0.5±0.5 | 4.1±2.1 | |
| Fruit (n=160) | ||||||
| Lycopersicum esculentum (Tomato) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5(8.92) | 0.3829 |
| Cucumis sativus (Cucumber) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3(5.35) | |
| Capsicum annum (Chili) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2(3.57) | |
| Abelmoschus esculantum (Lady finger) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4(7.14) | |
| Sub-total | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 14(25) | |
| Mean ± SD | 0.7±0.5 | 0.5±0.5 | 1.25±0. | 1±0.81 | 3.5±1.2 | |
| Gross total | 14(25) | 15(26.7) | 16(28.5) | 11(19.6) | 56 | |
Ascaris lumbricoides was detected in 2.88% (n=15/520) of vegetables examined in the present work. A study from Saudi Arabia reported the detection of A. lumbricoids in 16% of leafy vegetables examined . Another study from Iran, reported prevalence of A. lumbricoids eggs being detected in 2% of samples examined . Taenia saginata 2.69 %( n=14/520) and Trichuristrichura 2.11% (n=11/520) were evidenced in this study.
In current study the coriander had the highest parasitic contamination which is not with agreement to the studies conducted by ; ; ; in that the lettuce had the highest parasitic contamination, this may be due to its leaves which are capable of sheltering parasites more easily than other vegetables i.e. Zingiber officinale (Ginger), chili, Allium cepa (Onion) and cucumber.
Unhygienic handling during transportation as well as use of contaminated water to wash the vegetable are the main sources of parasitic diseases. Fresh vegetable samples in this study were found to have one or more than one species of parasite which reflects the level of faecal contamination of vegetables which may result in several parasitic infections . Besides that animal manure, faeces of wild jackals, foxes and stray dogs frequently visiting the fields, human defecation practices of rural population and post-harvest washing of the vegetables with dirty water also contribute to the contamination of vegetables. The high overall prevalence of parasitic contamination in vegetables indicates an alarmingly high risk for the consumers of the vegetables.
Conclusions
Fresh vegetables in Dir districts were moderately contaminated by intestinal parasites, which are source of infection with amoebiasis, ascariasis, taeniasis, trichuriasis and others. Effective and comprehensive prevention and control measures should be taken to ensure food safety.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to the greengrocers enrolled in this study and to Rafiq Ahmed for statistical advice in data analysis.
Statement of conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- Alade, G.O., Alade, T.O. and Adewuyi, I.K., 2013. Am. Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 13: 1275-1282.
- Al-Binali, A.M., Bello, C.S., El-Shewy, K. and Abdulla, S.E., 2006. Saudi med. J., 27: 613-616.
- Alhabbal, A.T., 2015. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 30: 94-97.
- Benti, G. and Gemechu, F., 2014. J. Parasitol. Vector Biol. 6: 103-109.
- Daryani, A., Ettehad, G.H., Sharif, M., Ghorbani, L. and Ziaei, H., 2008. Fd. Contr., 19: 790-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.08.004[CrossRef]
- Ebrahimzadeh, A., Jamshidi, A. and Mohammadi, S., 2013. Hlth. Scope, 1: 205-209. https://doi.org/10.17795/jhealthscope-8209[CrossRef]
- Eraky, M., Rashed, S., Nasr, M., El-Hamshary, A. and El-Ghannam, A., 2014. J. Parasitol. Res., Article ID: 613960. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/613960[CrossRef]
- Fallah, A.A., Pirali-Kheirabadi, K., Fatemeh, S. and Saei-Dehkordi, S., 2012. Iran Fd. Contr., 25: 617-620.
- Frazier, W.C. and Westhoff, D.C., 1998. Food microbiology. T.M.H. Edition. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 198-209.
- Gharavi, M.J., Jahani, M.R. and Rokni, M.B., 2002. Iranian J. Publ. Hlth., 31: 83-86.
- Gupta, N., Khan, D.K. and Santra, S.C., 2009. Fd. Contr., 20: 942-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.02.003[CrossRef]
- Idahosa, O.T., 2011. Global J. med. Res., 11: 20-25.
- Izadi, S.H., Abedi, A.S. and Mahmoodi, M., 2006. Sci. J. Kurdistan Univ. med. Sci., 11: 51-58.
- Klapec, T. and Borecka, A., 2012. Annls. agric. environ. Med., 19: 421-425.
- Liu, R.H., 2003. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 78 : 5175-20S.
- Luca, S.,A., Ajugi, I. and Umuh, J.U., 2000. J. Parasitol., 21: 109-116.
- Mohamed, M.A., Siddi, E.E., Elaagip, A.H., Edris, A.M.M. and Nasir, A.A., 2016. Annls. clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob., 15: 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-016-0133-5[CrossRef]
- Nazemi, S., Raei, M., Amiri, M. and Chaman, R., 2012. Zahedan J. Res. Med. Sci., 14: 84-86.
- Said, D., 2012. Alexandria J. Med., 48: 345-352.
- Shehu, M. and Amina, R., 2014. J. Zool. Biosci. Res., 1: 15-19.
- Simon-Oke, I.A., Afolabi, O.J. and Obasola, O.P., 2014. Researcher, 6: 30-35.
- Soulsby, E.J.L., 1982. Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals, 7th Edition, Bailliere Tindal, London, pp. 136-346.
- Sunil, B., Thomas, D., Latha, C. and Shameem, H., 2014. Vet. World, 7: 253-256. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.253-256[CrossRef]
- Tefera, T., Biruksew, A., Mekonnen. Z. and Eshetu T. 2014. Int. Sch. Res. Notices, Article ID: 382715. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/382715[CrossRef]
- Tomass, Z. and Kidane, D., 2012. CNCS Mekelle Univ., 4: 77-89.
- Uga, S., Hoa, N., Noda, S., Moji, K., Cong, L., Aoki, Y., Rai, S. and Fujimaki, Y., 2009. Nepal med. Coll. J., 11: 75-78.
- Ul-Haq, S., Maqbool, A., Javed, Khan, U., Yasmin, G. and Sultana, R., 2014. Pakistan J. Zool., 46: 1303-1309.
- Van-Duyn, M.A. and Pivonka, E., 2000. J. Am. Diet Assoc., 100: 1511-1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00420-X[CrossRef]
- Walked, H.M., 2009. J. appl. Sci. Res., 5: 293-296.
- WHO, 2003. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation. Geneva, World Health Organization, WHO Technical Report series, No. 916.
Services
Article usage statistics
Loading…
