Amaranth leaf meal inclusion did not affect the indigenous Boschveld chickens (Table 3) aged 21, 42, and 90 days. There were no linear or quadratic influences observed in any of the performance parameters at 21, 42, and 90 days with increased levels of ALM in their diets.
ALM levels did not affect lymphocytes of indigenous Boschveld chickens aged 42 days (Table 4). ALM inclusion levels significantly affect (P < 0.05) WBC, heterophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils of indigenous Boschveld chickens at 42 days. Indigenous Boschveld chickens treated with 0% ALM had a higher (P < 0.05) white blood cell count (WBC), heterophils, and monocytes. However, indigenous Boschveld chickens treated with 10% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) eosinophils. There was a linear (p = 0.029, 0.047, and 0.052) effect on WBC, lymphocytes, and monocytes with increasing levels of ALM in their diets.
At 90 days, amaranth leaf meal did not affect monocytes of indigenous Boschveld chickens. Indigenous Boschveld chickens which were treated with 5, 10, and 15% ALM, had higher (P < 0.05) heterophils and basophils. Similarly, chickens supplemented with 5, 10, and 15% ALM had the same heterophils. Indigenous Boschveld chickens treated with 15% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) lymphocytes and eosinophils. However, chickens offered with diets containing 10 and 15% ALM had similar lymphocytes. ALM treatments in the diets showed a linear (p= 0.029, 0.003, 0.002, and 0.004) effect on heterophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, and basophils, as well as a quadratic (p= 0.028) influence on monocytes.
Indigenous Boschveld chickens which were treated with 5% ALM (Table 5) had higher (P < 0.05) CP and CF digestibility. Indigenous Boschveld chickens supplemented
Table 3: Effect of amaranth leaf meal inclusion on feed intake (FI, g/bird), weight gain (gain, g/bird) and feed conversion ratio (FCR, g: g, FI: BWG) of Indigenous Boschveld chickens
Diets: ALM0g/kg= a diet having no amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM5g/kg= a diet having 5 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM10g/kg=a diet having 10 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM15g/kg= a diet having 15 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM20g/kg = a diet having 20 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. SEM: standard error of the mean
Table 4: Effect of amaranth inclusion leaf meal on blood profiles of Indigenous Boschveld chickens
Diets: ALM0%= a diet having no amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM5%= a diet having 5 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM10% =a diet having 10 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM15%= a diet having 15 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM20% = a diet having 20 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 5: Effect of amaranth leaf meal inclusion on nutrient digestibility of Indigenous Boschveld chickens
a, b, c, d, e Means in the same row not sharing a common superscript are different (p<0.05). Diets: ALM0%= a diet having no amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM5%= a diet having 5 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM10% =a diet having 10 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM15%= a diet having 15 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM20% = a diet having 20 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 6: Effect of amaranth leaf meal inclusion on essential amino acid digestibility (%) of Indigenous Boschveld chickens
a, b, c Means in the same row not sharing a common superscript are different (p<0.05). Diets: ALM0%= a diet having no amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM5%= a diet having 5 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM10% =a diet having 10 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM15%= a diet having 15 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM20% = a diet having 20 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 7: Effect of amaranth leaf meal inclusion on non-essential amino acid digestibility (%) of Indigenous Boschveld chickens
a, b, c, d Means in the same row not sharing a common superscript are different (p<0.05). Diets: ALM0%= a diet having no amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM5%= a diet having 5 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM10% =a diet having 10 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM15%= a diet having 15 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM20% = a diet having 20 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 8: Effect of amaranth leaf meal inclusion on gut organ weights of Indigenous Boschveld chickens
Diets: ALM0%= a diet having no amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM5%= a diet having 5 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM10% =a diet having 10 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM15%= a diet having 15 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM20% = a diet having 20 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 9: Effect of amaranth leaf meal inclusion on gut organ lengths of Indigenous Boschveld chickens
Diets: ALM0%= a diet having no amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM5%= a diet having 5 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM10% =a diet having 10 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM15%= a diet having 15 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM20% = a diet having 20 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 10: Effect of amaranth leaf meal inclusion on gut organ pH of Indigenous Boschveld chickens
Diets: ALM0%= a diet having no amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM5%= a diet having 5 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion, ALM10% =a diet having 10 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM15%= a diet having 15 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal inclusion. ALM20% = a diet having 20 g/kg of amaranth leaf meal
with a 15% ALM had higher (P < 0.05) EE digestibility. Indigenous Boschveld chickens treated with 0% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) ash digestibility. There was a linear (p=0.012) increase in DM and ash digestibility with increasing levels of ALM in the diets.
ALM inclusion significantly affects (P < 0.05) essential amino acids’ digestibility of indigenous Boschveld chickens as revealed in Table 6. Indigenous Boschveld chickens fed with 5% ALM revealed overall higher (P < 0.05) amino acid digestibility. There was no linear or quadratic effect observed in any amino acid digestibility of indigenous Boschveld chickens when increasing levels of ALM in the diets, even though there was a treatment effect observed in all amino acids’ digestibility.
Indigenous Boschveld chickens supplemented with 5% ALM in Table 7 revealed higher (P < 0.05) non-essential amino acids’ digestibility. Similarly, chickens supplemented with 5 and 15% ALM revealed the same Asp and Glu digestibility. Interestingly, all non-essential amino acids’ digestibility showed no linear or quadratic influence.
ALM inclusion did not affect gut organ weights of indigenous Boschveld chickens 21 days old as shown in Table 8. ALM inclusion did not affect GIT, crop, proventriculus, gizzard, liver, small intestine, caeca, or large intestine weights of indigenous Boschveld chickens aged 42 days. At the age of 42 days, indigenous Boschveld chickens supplemented with 0 and 5% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) spleen weights. At the age of 42 days, there was a linear (p = 0.048) effect on spleen weight and a quadratic (p = 0.018) effect on GIT weights with increasing levels of ALM in their diets.
At the age of 90 days, ALM significantly affects (P < 0.05) GIT, crop, and small intestine weights of indigenous Boschveld chickens. Indigenous Boschveld chickens supplemented with 20% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) GIT weights. Indigenous Boschveld chickens which were fed diets with 0% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) crop weights than those on diets containing 5, 10, 15, and 20% ALM. Indigenous chickens fed 10% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) small intestine weights. ALM inclusion in the diets showed a linear (p = 0.024) effect on the GIT weight.
ALM did not affect GIT, small intestine, caeca, or large intestine weights of indigenous Boschveld chickens aged 21, 42, and 90 days, respectively as shown in Table 9. There were neither linear nor quadratic effects observed in any gut organ lengths with increasing levels of ALM in their diets.
ALM did not affect the gizzard, small intestine, caeca, or large intestine pH of indigenous Boschveld chickens aged 21 days. ALM significantly (Table 10, P < 0.05) affected crop and proventriculus pH of indigenous Boschveld chickens 21 days old. Indigenous Boschveld chickens treated with 15 and 20% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) crop pH values. Linear (p = 0.004 and 0.0.022) and quadratic (p = 0.006) effects were observed on crop and proventriculus pH with increasing levels of ALM in their diets.
ALM did not affect the crop, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine, or large intestine pH of indigenous Boschveld chickens for 42 days. ALM inclusion significantly affected (P < 0.05) caeca pH at 42 days. Indigenous chickens fed 0% ALM revealed higher (P < 0.05) caeca pH values. However, chickens fed 0, 10, 15, and 20% ALM had similar caeca pH values. ALM did not affect the crop, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine, or large intestine pH of indigenous Boschveld chickens aged 90 days. There was no linear, nor quadratic, influence observed in any nutrient digestibility of indigenous Boschveld chickens with increasing levels of ALM in the diets.