Short Communication · Volume 53, Issue 2, 28 February 2021 · Open Access
Immunomodulatory Effect of New Castle Disease Virus on Inactivated Mycoplasma gallisepticum Vaccine Response in Broilers
· · · · · · ·
Affiliations & Notes ⌄
- 1University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan 2Veterinary Research Institute, Lahore, Pakistan 3Virtual University of Pakistan , * Corresponding author: drkhushi.muhammad@uvas.edu.pk
Article Info ⌄
- Journal:
- Pakistan Journal of Zoology
- Published:
- 28 February 2021

From the article
- It is concluded that bivalent MG+NDV vaccine can be prepared to induce effective immunoprophylaxis against both the immunogens simultaneously.
- Moreover, oil-based vaccine is more effective in induction of immunity than that of the gel based vaccine.
Selected from the article's own text.
Abstract
Materials and methods
One-day old Hubbard chicks (n=40) were purchased from Hi-Tech Hatchery, Multan road, Lahore and reared at the experimental shed, Department of Microbiology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (UVAS), Lahore. The chicks were raised under standard management conditions for a period of 42 days. On 7th day of age, the chicks were divided into A, B, C, D and E groups (n=8).
Local isolate of MG confirmed through polymerase chain reaction was procured in active form from University Diagnostic Laboratory (UDL), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (UVAS) Lahore. For revival of MG culture Frey’s broth culture medium (250ml contains 0.074g thallium acetate, 5.62 g PPLO broth base, 1.25g yeast extract, 0.0074 g phenol red, 0.074 g glucose (10% w/v), 0.025 g nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (1% w/v), 0.025 g cysteine HCL (1% w/v), 0.156g penicillin G and 30ml horse serum) was used.
Active MG culture (10% v/v) was added in the Frey’s broth culture medium in a flask of 250 ml capacity and incubated at 37°C in 10% CO2 incubator (70% humidity) for 48 h. Broth was observed daily for growth. After 48 h of incubation, there was change in color of medium from red to yellow. At this stage, freshly prepared sterile broth (250ml) was added after every 48 h till the volume became 1 liter. The whole culture was centrifuged at 3000xg for 20 min. The pellet was suspended in 10ml PBS in Hopkins’s tube (KimaxR , USA) that was further centrifuged at 3000xg for 20 min to estimate packed cell volume (PCV) per ml of the medium and the result was recorded. The mass of the bacteria was admixed in PBS to make 1% suspension (Yoder et al., 2009).
The bacterial suspension admixed with 0.125% of formaldehyde (37%) (Scharlau, Spain) was incubated at 37°C with 10% CO2 for 12 h. The inactivated bacterial suspension was cultured on the broth and agar, incubated at 37°C with 10% CO2 for 7 days to confirm inactivation (Koskiet al., 1976).
Newcastle disease virus (lentogenic strain) used for vaccine preparation was taken from UDL, UVAS Lahore. The virus was grown in 9 days old chicken embryosb inouculating through chorioallantoic sac route. The allanto amniotic fluid (AAF) thus harvested from embryos was processed for determination of embryo infected dose 50 (EID50) . AAF was processed for sterility on tryptose broth and tryptose agar and safety test in the non-vaccinated 30 days old broilers .
Gel based MG (G-MG) vaccine was prepared (0.3 ml/dose) by mixing 0.06 ml of one percent inactivated MG suspension, 0.06 ml PBS and 0.18 ml of 4% aluminum hydroxide gel. Oil based MG (O-MG) vaccine was prepared (0.3 ml/dose) by mixing 0.06 ml of one percent inactivated MG suspension, 0.06ml PBS and 0.18 ml montanide ISA-70 (SEPPIC, France). Oil based MG+NDV (O-MG+NDV) vaccine was prepared (0.3 ml/dose) by mixing 0.06 ml of one percent inactivated MG suspension, 0.06ml NDV having 106 unit of EID50 and 0.18 ml montanide ISA-70. Gel based MG+NDV (G-MG+NDV) vaccine was prepared (0.3 ml/dose) by mixing 0.06 ml of one percent inactivated MG suspension, 0.06ml NDV having 106 unit of EID50 and 0.18 ml of 4% aluminum hydroxide gel.
On 7th day of age, the chicks were randomly divided into A, B, C, D and E groups (n=8) and each chick of group A, B, C and D was primed (sub-cut injection at mid-dorsal side of the neck) with 0.3 ml of O-MG, O-MG+NDV, G-MG+NDV and G-MG vaccine, respectively. Each chick of group E served as un-vaccinated control.
Blood sample was collected aseptically from wing vein of each chick of each of the groups on 21, 28 and 35 days post vaccination. The serum sample from each blood sample was separated, transferred to properly labeled serum vials and stored at -400C till further processing. Each serum sample was processed for determination of anti-MG-ELISA using ProFLOK MG ELISA kit (Synbiotics Corporation, USA) .
The data thus achieved processed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subsequently Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) using SPSS version 16.0 (Table I).
Results and discussion
MG is a persistent, highly transmissible chicken pathogen yield significant losses in performance and economics to all sectors of the poultry industry. Stringent biosecurity and bio surveillance practices are needed to control MG within the poultry industry as there is vertical transmission of MG results progeny flocks infected or carrier . MG shows poor growth in the agar culture medium. MG grew well in Frey’s broth and its growth was further augmented by its continuous growth method. It might be due to continuous supply of enrichment additives over 10 days of incubation. MG does not produce any toxin (exotoxin, endotoxin) as it is wall less bacteria but the components of the broth are antigenic so are removed by centrifugation of the culture suspension. It yielded 0.75ml/10ml of the medium. Its biological titer for production of vaccine may be one percent (1%) of MG in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution PH 7.2. Formaldehyde inactivated the MG suspension when admixed at rate of 0.15% at 37 C within 12 h. The suspension was therefore inactivated through mixing formaldehyde (37 per cent: Merck) @ 0.05 per cent . Formaldehyde molecules inactivate its viability when it binds with amine group of amino acids in protein molecule of the organisms. Its higher concentration reduces the antigenicity of the organisms. Killed vaccines require the adjuvant as opposed to live attenuated vaccines . Different adjuvants when admixed with vaccinal antigen enhance the immuneresponse . Mineral oil (Montanide ISA 70) encapsulates the immunogen and hence enhances its retention time at the inoculation site . However, aluminum hydroxide gel is also used for the purpose in veterinary and medical vaccines. Aluminum-containing vaccines are prepared by adsorption of antigens onto aluminum hydroxideor aluminum phosphate gels or by precipitation of antigens in a solution of alum .
Table I. Comparative mean anti-MG-ELISA antibody response of broilers to adjuvated MG vaccines.
| Type of vaccine | Anti-MG-ELISA antibody titer on days post-vaccination (DPV) | Cumulative mean antibody titer | ||
| 21 | 28 | 35 | ||
| G-MG | 32.21±23.46 | 74.6±64.41 | 134.13±68.11 | 80.30b |
| O-MG | 34.04±28.04 | 55.34±34.3 | 323.1±401.04 | 137.49c |
| G-MG+NDV | 33.78±57.85 | 101.92±56.86 | 139.09±41.95 | 91.59b |
| O-MG+NDV | 68.17±32 | 162.95±69.11 | 278.18±91.34 | 169.76c |
| Control | 0.12±0.23 | 0.16±0.34 | 0.17±0.34 | 0.15a |
Cumulative mean values of anti-MG-ELISA antibody titer in last column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). MG, Mycoplasma gallisepticum; NDV, Newcastle disease virus; O, oil based; G, gel based.
Antibody response of the host is directly proportional to the retention time of the immunogen. This could be plausible reason of higher antibody response of birds to oil based vaccines than that of gel based vaccines. Vaccines induce specific immune responses in the vaccinated birds in the form of production of specific antibodies, and nonspecific factors / cytokines particularly interferon gamma that activate antigen stimulated B cells, macrophages, cytotoxic T cells, Natural Killer (NK) cells, etc. ; .
Birds vaccinated with G-MG vaccine showed 32.21±23.46, 74.6±64.41 and 134.13±68.11 anti-MG- ELISA mean antibody titer at 21, 28 and 35 days post vaccination.). The broilers vaccinated with O-MG vaccine showed34.04±28.04, 55.3±34.3 and 323.11±401.04 anti-MG- ELISA mean antibody titer at 21, 28 and 35 days post vaccination. These results are similar to the observation of Barbour et al. (2002). This study revealed significant immunoglobulin (Ig) response specific to MG in sera of chickens collected 3 weeks after the first and second vaccination with MG adjuvanted with oil-emulsion as compare to other adjuvants. That might be because oil has more antigen retention and slow degradation power as compare to gel so oil based vaccine has long term effect and titer decreases slowly.
Birds vaccinated with G-MG+NDV vaccine (live Newcastle disease virus) showed 33.78±57.85, 101.92±56.86 and 139.09±41.95 anti-MG- ELISA antibody titer at 21, 28 and 35 days post vaccination. Birds vaccinated O-MG+NDV showed68.17±32, 162.95±69.11, 278.1±91.34 anti-MG- ELISA antibody titer at 21, 28 and 35 days postvaccination. The possible reason is the production of cytokines by T cell due to T cell dependent antigen. In the immune-compromised birds, interferon gamma is not produced effectively in response to the vaccine so macrophages are not properly activated that ultimately fail to kill phagocytosed mycoplasma . CD8+ cells activated in response to interferon gamma may inactivate the intracellular mycoplasma in macrophages or other cells . A carrier form of MG infected flock may be treated by inducing any antigen to such chicken as can produce interferon gamma that can subsequently activates macrophages for microbicidal activity. The major advantage of oil-emulsion bacterin is protection against economic losses can be obtained without the introduction of any live-vaccine strain. Whereas, disadvantages include: cost, requirement of handling individual chicken, and the relative lack of protection against colonization of field challenge strains of MG. Although vaccination for MG can be a useful tool, especially on multi-age commercial egg-production sites yet vaccination should be limited to situations where maintenance of infection free flocks is not feasible.
Antibody response of vaccinated broilers to combined MG-NDV vaccine was not significantly different from the birds vaccinated with either of the monovalent NDV or MG vaccine (p>0.05). Moreover, it was observed that oil based monovalent (MG) or bivalent (MG+NDV) vaccine induced significantly higher antibody response in the vaccinated broilers than that of the birds vaccinated with gel based monovalent (MG) or bivalent (MG+NDV) vaccine (p<0.05).
Conclusion
It is concluded that bivalent MG+NDV vaccine can be prepared to induce effective immunoprophylaxis against both the immunogens simultaneously. Moreover, oil-based vaccine is more effective in induction of immunity than that of the gel based vaccine.
Acknowledgements
Authors of the project are immensely grateful for financial support by “Pak-USA Mycoplasma Project” and supplying of day-old chicks by Hi-Tech Poultry Breeders to execute research in the best interest of poultry industry.
Statement of conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- Ahmad, A., Rabbani, M., Yaqoob, T., Ahmad, A., Shabbir, M.Z. and Akhtar, F., 2008. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 18: 61-63.
- Ali, A. and Reynolds, D.L., 2000. Avian Dis., 44: 938-943. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593068[CrossRef]
- Anonymous, 2008. Office of International Epizootics (OIE), Manual of standards diagnostic tests and vaccines for list A and B diseases of mammals, birds and bees, pp. 482-496.
- Anonymous, 2014-2015. Pakistan economic survey. Economic Advisory Wing, Finance Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, pp. 40-42.
- Avakian, A.P., Kleven, S.H. and Glisson, J.R., 1988. Avian Dis., 32: 262-272. https://doi.org/10.2307/1590813[CrossRef]
- Barbour, E.K. and Newman, J.A., 1990. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 26: 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2427(90)90061-V[CrossRef]
- Barbour, E.K. and Hamadeh, S.K., 2000. Poult. Sci., 79: 1730-1735.
- Boyaka, P.N. and McGhee, J.R., 2001. Adv. Drug. Deliv., 51: 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00170-3[CrossRef]
- Butcher, G.D., 2009. Mycoplasma gallisepticum-a continuing problem in commercial poultry. Available from: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
- Coffman, R.L., Sher, A. and Seder, R.A., 2010. Immunity, 33: 492-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.002[CrossRef]
- Evans, J.D., Leigh, S.A., Branton, S.L., Collier, S.D., Pharr, G.T. and Bearson, S.M.D., 2005. J. appl. Poult. Res., 14: 757-763. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.4.757[CrossRef]
- Evans, J.D., Leigh, S.A., Branton, S.L. and Collier, S.D., 2007. Avian Dis., 2: e24-e24. https://doi.org/10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e24:EOIDOT]2.0.CO;2[CrossRef]
- Feizi, A., Nikpiran, H., Bijanzad, P., Moggadam, A.R.J. and Hosseini, H., 2013. Adv. Biores., 4: 50-53.
- Gharaibeh, S. and Al Roussan, D., 2008. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 7: 28-35. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.28.35[CrossRef]
- Gobel, T.W.F., 1996. In: Poultry immunology, poultry science symposium (eds. T.F. Davison, T.R. Morris, and L.N. Payne). Carfax Publishing Co. Abingdon, UK. pp. 31-45.
- Gondal, M.A., Rabbani, M., Muhammad, K., Yaqub, M.T., Babar, A., Sheikh, A.A., Ahmad, A., Shabbir, M. and Khan, M.I., 2013. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 23: 1094-1098.
- GOP, 2014. Economic Survey of Pakistan. Ministry of finance, Government of Pakistan
- Hilton, L.S., Bean, A.G.D. and Lowenthal, J.W., 2002. Vet. Immunol. Immuno. Pathol., 85: 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2427(01)00414-7[CrossRef]
- Hogenesch, H., 2002. Vaccine, 20: S34-S39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00169-X[CrossRef]
- Karaca, K. and Lam, K.M., 1987. Avian Pathol., 16: 513-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458708436400[CrossRef]
- Kleven, S.H., 2008. Avian Dis., 52: 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1637/8323-041808-Review.1[CrossRef]
- Koski, T.A., Christianson, G.G. and Cole, F.L., 1976. J. biol. Stand., 151-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-1157(76)90026-3[CrossRef]
- Mukhtar, M., Awais, M., Anwar, M.I., Hussain, Z., Bhatti, N. and Ali. S., 2012. J. Basic appl. Sci., 8: 183-186.
- Muneta, Y., Minagawa, Y., Shimoji, Y., Nagata, R., Markham, P.F., Browning, G.F. and Mori, Y., 2006. J. Interferon Cytokine Res., 26: 637-44. https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2006.26.637[CrossRef]
- Olanrewaju, H.A., Collier, S.D. and Branton, S.L., 2011. Poult. Sci., 90: 358-363. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01006[CrossRef]
- Petrovsky N. and Aguilar J.C., 2004. Immunol. Cell Biol., 82: 488-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0818-9641.2004.01272.x[CrossRef]
- Shakya, A.K. and Nandakumar, K.S., 2013. J.R. Soc. Interface, 10: 20120536. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0536[CrossRef]
- Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. and Dickey, D.A., 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 3rd Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Villegas, P., 1998. Titration of biological suspensions. In: A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens (eds. D.E. Swayne, J.R. Glisson, M.W. Jackwood, J.E. Pearson and W.M. Reed). University of Pennsylvania, American Association of Avian Pathologists, Kennett Square. pp. 248–253.
- Yilmaz, F., Timurkaan, N., Kilic, A., Kalender, H. and Kilinc, U., 2011. Rev. Med. Vet., 162: 79-80.
- Yoder, H.W.Jr., Hopkins, S.R. and Mitchell, B.W., 1984. Avian Dis., 28: 224-234. https://doi.org/10.2307/1590145[CrossRef]
Cited by 1 article
In journals published by ResearchersLinks.
Services
Article usage statistics
Loading…
