In Vitro Efficacy of Medicinal Plant Material on the Inhibition of Development of Egg of Ascaridia galli

Md. Shakhayet Hossain; Anita Rani Dey; Nurjahan Begum; Md. Abdul Alim

doi:10.14737/journal.jap/2015/2.1.5.10

Research Article · Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 5–10, 8 April 2015 · Open Access

In Vitro Efficacy of Medicinal Plant Material on the Inhibition of Development of Egg of Ascaridia galli

· · ·

Article Info ⌄

Journal:: The Journal of Advances in Parasitology
DOI:: 10.14737/journal.jap/2015/2.1.5.10
Published:: 8 April 2015

Download PDF Set Alert Get Rights Reprints

From the article

Among the five selected plant, pineapple was the highest efficacious plant against the development of A. galli eggs at 20% concentration (86.9%) of fresh juice of leaves followed by pineapple at 10% concentration (84.0%), garlic at 5% concentration (81.8%), turmeric at 20% concentration (78.9%) (Table 2).
These findings indicated that turmeric leaves have better efficacy on the inhibition of development of A. galli eggs in juice preparation than dust.
The leaves of akanda revealed the maximum efficacy against eggs of A. galli at 5% dust (75.0%) followed by 10% juice (73.0% and 69.2%) both at 10% juice and 20% dust concentration.
It is concluded that among five plants and different preparations, pineapple, turmeric and akanda were found effective.

Selected from the article's own text.

Abstract

Md. Shakhayet Hossain¹, Anita Rani Dey^2*, Nurjahan Begum², Md. Abdul Alim²

¹Agroni bank Ltd, Bandar branch, Chittagong; ²Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.

*Correspondence | Anita Rani Dey, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh; Email: anitadey.dpp.vet@gmail.com

Abstract
To determine the in vitro efficacy of indigenous plants on the inhibition of development of eggs of Ascaridia galli, a study was carried out in the laboratory of Department of Parasitology from January to May, 2012. Leaves of five plants namely pineapple (Ananas comosus), turmeric (Curcuma domestica), akanda (Calotropis gigantea), garlic (Allium sativum) and custard apple (Annona reticulata) were selected. Two different types of preparation such as fresh juice and dust material were used. Fresh leaves juice at 5%, 10% and 20% concentration and dust of leaves at 5%, 10% and 20% concentration were used for screening. Among the selected plants in all three concentrations of fresh juice of leaves, pineapple was the highest effective plant (86.9%) at 20% concentration followed by pineapple at 10% concentration (84.0%), garlic at 5% concentration (81.8%), turmeric at 20% concentration (78.9%), pineapple at 5% concentration (78.9%), turmeric at 10% concentration (73.9%), garlic at 10% concentration (73.0%). Among the plants in all concentrations of dust of leaves, pineapple at 20% concentration (76.9%) was observed as the best plant followed by akanda at 5% concentration (75.0%) and turmeric at 20% concentration (73.3%). The present study suggests that pineapple, turmeric and garlic leaves are effective and can be used against the development of eggs of A. galli. So, further studies are required to determine the side effects of these plants and determine the recommended doses in poultry.

Keywords | In vitro, Efficacy, Medicinal plant, Ascaridia galli

INTRODUCTION

Ascaridia galli is one of the most common parasitic roundworms of poultry that occurs in chickens and turkey ; ; . Embryonated eggs of A. galli are very hardy and under laboratory conditions may live for two years in ordinary conditions. However, few probably live more than one year . Disinfectants and other cleaning agents do not kill eggs under farm conditions and chickens become infected by eating infective eggs containing L3 . Chemical anthelmintics have long been considered the only effective way of controlling this parasitic infection. Available drugs remove only the adult parasite and also some serious disadvantages of using manufactured drugs have become evident in the world, such as drug resistance, food residues and environmental pollution. A general stagnation in the development of conventional medicine has led to an increased need for research into alternative therapeutic agents for the treatment and control of helminth infections. Medicinal plants have been used to combat parasitism, and in many parts of the world are still used for this purpose . In ethno-veterinary medicine, which draws inspiration from traditional practice, there seems to be a range of plant/s or plant extract suitable for treating almost every parasitic disease of livestock and poultry.

It is estimated that more than 20,000 species of plants are used medicinally throughout the world for controlling diverse disease . Pineapple, turmeric, akanda, garlic and custard apple are the medicinal plants available in Bangladesh those have anthelmintic activity ; ; . The active compound of garlic is allicin which is an organosulfur compound . The pharmacological activity of turmeric has nematocidal . Treatment with allicin from garlic is effective against A. galli in chicken . In vitro and in vivo screening of plant materials as anthelmintic against adult A. galli has been done throughout the world with the aim of controlling A. galli in poultry. But eggs generally have a long survival rate in the environment, and thus a high infection potential. So, the present study will have a great importance in controlling A. galli in chickens, as this work will be a stand point to control A. galli by inhibiting the development of eggs using available indigenous plants and thus reducing the infection. Therefore, this research plan was designed with a view to evaluate the efficacy of some plant materials on the inhibition of development of eggs of A. galli eggs and also to compare the efficacy of the fresh juice and dust of leaves of candidate plants against development of A. galli eggs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted from January May, 2012 in the laboratory of the Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh.

Preparation of Plant Materials for Experiment

Selection of Plants Used in this Experiment

Five plants namely pineapple (A. comosus), turmeric (C. domestica), akanda (C. gigantea), garlic (A. sativum) and custard apple (A. reticulata) were selected on the basis of their ethnomedical uses for screening.

Processing of Leaves

After collection, leaves were separated from the plants and washed thoroughly in running tap water. The dust and juice of leaves used in this study were processed. For the preparation of fresh juice, the fresh leaves were cut into small pieces and water was added at 1:1 ratio in a kitchen blender. Then juice were made by blending the leaves for 2-3 minutes and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C to maintain the quality of active ingredients of juice. For the preparation of dust, the leaves were dried in the shade at room temperature and then they were dried in the oven at 55-60°C. The dried leaves were cut into small pieces and pulverized with a blender. A 25mm mesh diameter sieve was used to obtain the fine dust, after then dust was preserved in airtight plastic container until they were directly used in litter materials for screening and preparation of aqueous.

Collection and Maintenance of Eggs of A. galli

Collection of Eggs of A. galli

At first, intestines were collected from indigenous chickens slaughtered in the nearby market at BAU campus and brought to the laboratory. Then, adult A. galli were collected from small intestine following a standard method . Female parasites were identified under microscope and separated from males. Eggs were recovered by grinding the female parasites with pestle and mortar by adding 5 ml PBS. These fresh eggs were used for the experiment.

Treatment of Egg-PBS Suspension with Plant Materials

Treatment of eggs with fresh leaves juice: Petri dishes were used for the treatment which were properly washed, dried and then labeled. PBS was used as media for this trial and 10 ml of total volume were made for each trial as in Table 1. Upper meniscus of total 10 ml volume of suspension in all petridishes was marked by permanent ink. Fresh leaves juices were used as 5%, 10% and 20% and for control, one petridish with egg-PBS suspension retained without treatment. The petridishes were kept at room temperature for 20 days. Petri dishes were placed at a large tray and moist cotton was used under the petri dishes to prevent desiccation. All petri dishes were covered in same manner; about half of the petri dishes were kept open to allow aeration for development of eggs. Continuous monitoring of petri dishes had been done and the upper meniscus of fluid was maintained by adding PBS if necessary.

Table 1: Making of fresh leaves juice concentrations for trial

Concentration (in %)	Volume (in ml)
Concentration (in %)	Fresh leaves Juice	PBS	Egg-PBS suspension	Total
Control (0)	0	9	1	10
5	0.5	8.5	1	10
10	1	8	1	10
20	2	7	1	10

Treatment of litter with dust: Dust of each plant leaves were used at 10% and 20% concentrations. For making different preparations, 8g, 9g and 9.5g, 5% of litter were mixed with 2g, 1g and 0.5g of dust for 20%, 10% and 0.5% concentration respectively. For each trial, total 10g of litter-dust mixture were kept in the medium sized petri dishes and 1 ml of egg-PBS suspensions were sprayed on each petri dish. For the control, only 10g of litter were sprayed with 1 ml of egg-PBS suspension. All petri dishes were kept at room temperature for 20 days and after then water was added with the mixture and sieved to remove litter. The filtrate was allowed to stand for 30 minutes for sedimentation of eggs. The supernatant was poured off and the sediment was washed for several times to make it clear. Finally the filtrate was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for five minutes and the sediment was taken on a clear slide to examine the eggs under microscope.

Examination of eggs for development of larvae: Fresh juice and dust treated eggs were examined at 10th day, 15th day and 20th day for the development of larvae within the eggs. Developed eggs were identified with the presence of larvae within egg and the movement of larvae. Both fresh/undeveloped and treated eggs were identified under microscope with high power objectives.

Determination of efficacy of plants: In vitro screening of fresh leaves juice and dust of leaves of selected plants on the inhibition of development of A. galli eggs were done for their efficacy; and the plant/preparations were considered as effective having at least 70% efficacy.

Statistical Analysis

In vitro effects of different preparations of plant leaves were statistically analyzed with ANOVA technique to obtain the level of significance using MSTAT-C package programme developed by Russell (1986). The mean differences were compared by /Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (DMRT) .

RESULTS

Among the five selected plant, pineapple was the highest efficacious plant against the development of A. galli eggs at 20% concentration (86.9%) of fresh juice of leaves followed by pineapple at 10% concentration (84.0%), garlic at 5% concentration (81.8%), turmeric at 20% concentration (78.9%) (Table 2). From the present study, it is found that fresh leaves juice was more efficacious than the dust of leaves.

In vitro Screening of Fresh Juice of Leaves

Efficacy of Fresh Leaves Juice at 5% Concentrations

During in vitro screening of fresh leaves juice of five selected plants at 5% concentration, the highest efficacy in terms of inhibition of development of growth of larvae was found in garlic (81.8%) followed by pineapple (78.9%), turmeric (70.0%), akanda (69.2%) and custard apple (58.3%) (Table 2).

Efficacy of Fresh Leaves Juice at 10% Concentration

In case of investigation of efficacy of fresh leaves juice at 10% concentration, pineapple was found as most efficacious plant (84.0%) followed by turmeric (73.9%), akanda (73.0%), custard apple (71.4%) and garlic (63.1%) (Table 2).

Efficacy of Fresh Leaves Juice at 20% Concentration

At 20% concentration of fresh leaves juice, highest efficacy was found in pineapple (86.9%) followed by turmeric (78.9%), custard apple (72.0%), akanda (66.6%) and garlic (65.0%) (Table 2).

Overall Performance of Fresh Leaves Juice

Among the selected plants and in all three concentrations of fresh juice of leaves, pineapple was the highest efficacious plant against the development of A. galli eggs. Papaya was the second highest followed by akanda and garlic, whereas custard apple was the least efficacious. The efficacy of fresh juice of leaves of plants can be presented chronologically as: pineapple at 20% concentration (86.9%) > pineapple at 10% concentration (84.0%) > garlic at 5% concentration (81.8%) > turmeric at 20% concentration (78.9%) > pineapple at 5% concentration (78.9%) > turmeric at 10% concentration (73.9%) >garlic at 10% concentration (73.0%).

In vitro Screening of Dust of Leaves

Efficacy of Dust at 5% Concentration

At 5% concentration of dust of leaves, the highest efficacy was observed in akanda (75.0%), followed by turmeric (73.3%), pineapple (70.5%), garlic (64.2%) and custard apple (57.1%) (Table 3).

Efficacy of Dust at 10% Concentration

At 10% concentration of dust of leaves, the highest efficacy was observed in pineapple and turmeric (71.4%), followed by akanda (60.0%), custard apple (53.8%) and garlic (50.0%) (Table 3).

Efficacy of Dust at 20% Concentration

In case of dust preparation of leaves at 20% concentration, the highest efficacy was found in the pineapple (76.9%), followed by turmeric (73.3%), akanda 69.2%), garlic (66.6%) and custard apple (53.3%) (Table 3).

Overall Efficacy of Dust of Leaves

Among the plants, in all concentrations of dust of leaves, Pineapple was observed as the best plant followed by akanda, turmeric, garlic and custard apple. Chronological distribution of efficacy of dust of plants leaves at different concentrations: pineapple at 20% concentration (76.9%) > akanda at 5% concentration (75.0%) > turmeric at 20% concentration (73.3%). In case of control group, less than 22% efficacy was found in all concentration of juice and dust preparation.

Table 2: Efficacy of fresh leaves juice of five selected plants at 5%, 10% and 20% concentration against development of A. galli eggs

Name of plants	5% concentration							10% concentration						20% concentration
	Tot al no. of egg	No. of dev el op ed eg gs				No. of unde vel oped eggs	Effe cts aga inst dev elo pm ent of eggs	Total no. of egg	No. of developed eggs			No. of undev eloped eggs	Effects against devel opment of eggs	Tot al no. of egg	No. of devel oped eggs			No. of und eve lo ped eggs	Effects against develo pment of eggs
		Observation at (days)				No. of unde vel oped eggs	Effe cts aga inst dev elo pm ent of eggs		Observation at (days)			No. of undev eloped eggs	Effects against devel opment of eggs	Tot al no. of egg	Observation at (days)			No. of und eve lo ped eggs	Effects against develo pment of eggs
		10th	15th		20th				10th	15th	20th				10th	15th	20th
Pine apple	19	2	4		4	15	78.9	25	2	4	4	21	84.0	23	2	3	3	20	86.9
Turm eric	20	4	5		6	14	70.0	23	2	4	6	17	73.9	19	2	3	4	15	78.9
Aka nda	26	2	6		8	18	69.2	26	3	6	7	19	73.0	18	4	6	6	12	66.6
Ga rlic	22	1	3		4	18	81.8	19	5	7	7	12	63.1	20	6	7	7	13	65.0
Cust ard ap ple	24	4	7		10	14	58.3	21	4	5	6	15	71.4	25	4	6	7	18	72.0
Con trol	17	12	14		15	2	11.7	17	13	15	15	2	11.7	25	8	19	23	2	8.0
Level of significance				**				**						**

In a column figures with same letter or without letter do not differ significantly whereas figures with dissimilar letter differ significantly (as per DMRT); ** = Significant at 1% level of probability

Table 3: Efficacy of dust of leaves of five selected plants against development at 5%, 10% and 20% concentration of A. galli eggs

Name of plants	5% concentration							10% concentration						20% concentration
	To tal no. of egg	No. of developed eggs				No. of und evel oped eggs	Effe cts on dev elopm ent of eggs	Tot al no. of egg	No. of developed eggs			No. of und evel oped eggs	Effe cts on dev elop ment of eggs	To tal no. of egg	No. of developed eggs			No. of und evel oped eggs	Effects on develop ment of eggs
		Observation at (days)							Observation at (days)						Observation at (days)
		10th	15th		20th				10th	15th	20th				10th	15th	20th
Pine apple	17	3	5		5	12	70.5	14	2	3	4	10	71.4	13	2	3	3	10	76.9
Turm eric	15	2	3		4	11	73.3	14	3	4	4	10	71.4	15	2	3	4	11	73.3
Aka nda	16	1	3		4	12	75.0	15	2	5	6	9	60.0	13	3	4	4	9	69.2
Gar lic	14	3	4		5	9	64.2	16	6	8	8	8	50.0	12	1	2	4	8	66.6
Cus tard apple	14	4	6		6	8	57.1	13	4	5	6	7	53.8	15	3	6	7	8	53.3
Con trol	13	8	9		11	2	15.3	12	7	9	10	2	16.6	14	8	9	11	3	21.4
Level of significance				**				**						**

DISCUSSION

Pineapple (A. comosus) is an important medicinal plant with diverse pharmacological spectrum. The active ingredient of A. comosus is bromelian. The effect of bromelian (proteolytic enzyme) is to digest parasites . In this experiment, highest efficacy of pineapple leaves was found in 20% juice (86.9%), followed by 10% juice (84.0%). These finding could be compared with the study of Rahman (2002) who recorded the findings against gastro intestinal nematodes where juice of pineapple showed the best (86.00%) efficacy. Patra et al. (2010) reported that the anthelmintic activity of pineapple is 85.0% after 20 days of treatment.

Curcumin is the main active constituent of turmeric which may cause death of A. galli during in vitro study . Number of researchers reported the anthelmintic activity of turmeric (C. domestica) against adult A. galli (Ahktar and Riffat, 1985; and other helminths ; ; ; ; ; ; . In this experiment, highest efficacy of turmeric leaves was found in 20% juice (78.9%), followed by 10% juice (73.9%) and dust at 20% concentration (73.3%). These findings indicated that turmeric leaves have better efficacy on the inhibition of development of A. galli eggs in juice preparation than dust. Rahman (2002) recorded the highest efficacy (100%) of turmeric leaves in alcoholic extract whereas aqueous extract have the lower efficacy (92.0%) against gastrointestinal nematodes in goats.

The active ingredient of garlic (A. sativum) is allicin. Allicin is readily permeable through phospholipid membranes and affects helminthes by altering the body surface of helminthes . In this study, garlic leaves showed efficacy at 5% juice (81.8%), followed by 5% dust (64.2%), 10% juice (63.1%) and 10% dust (50.0%) against A. galli. These records have close agreements with study of Murdiati et al., (1997), Lamtiur (2000) and Rahman (2002) that proved the anthelmintics efficacy against A. galli. These findings have also similarities with the study of Kumar et al (1991) who compared in vitro effects of BITC (benrylisothiocyanate), an anthelmintic principle of garlic with mebendazole against A. galli and found effective.

The leaves of C. gigantea (Akanda) are used as a vermicide. The active component of C. gigantea is calotropain. This proteolytic enzyme can digest parasites . The efficacy of leaves of akanda is determined in this experiment. The leaves of akanda revealed the maximum efficacy against eggs of A. galli at 5% dust (75.0%) followed by 10% juice (73.0% and 69.2%) both at 10% juice and 20% dust concentration.. These records is more or less similar with the findings of Lal et al. (1976) and Ali (2006) who studied the anthelmintic efficacy of akanda against adult A. galli as well as other helminthes. Similarly, Rahman (2002) recorded the efficacy of akanda in aqueous (67%) and ethanol extract (79%) against gastro intestinal nematodes in vivo. These findings are partially agreed with percentage of efficacy of present study, though present study recommends the plants as effective which have at least 70% efficacy.

Preliminary phytochemical investigation of methanolic extract revealed the presence of alkaloid, acetogenin, flavonoids, stenoid and triterpenoids in A. reticulata . Previous studies reported that alkaloid is responsible for the paralysis of earthworm. Tannin might have anthelmintic activity by binding with free proteins in gastrointestinal tract of earthworm and cause death ; . Dust powder of custard apple was found 57.1% and 53.3% effective at 5% and 10% concentration respectively. These results could be compared with the findings of Chakraborty et al. (2008) who recorded the efficacy (77.0%) of custard apple leaves against sporulation of Eimeria tenella oocysts. According to Bhale et al. (2011), methanolic extract of leaves of custard apple have a potent anthelmintic activity.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that among five plants and different preparations, pineapple, turmeric and akanda were found effective. But they can not be used directly, as many microbes multiply in moist liter. So further studies are therefore needed to find out the side effects of these plants and determine the recommended doses in poultry.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors express special thanks to respected teachers in the department of Parasitology for their kind help.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

Akhtar MS, Riffat S (1985). Evaluation of Melia azedarach Linn. seeds (Bakain) and piperazine against Ascaridia galli infection in chickens. Pak. Vet. J. 5: 34-37.
Ali MA (2006). In vitro anthelmintic effects of some indigenous plants against Ascaridia galli of indigenous chikens. MS thesis. Submitted to the Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh., pp 44.
Anderson RC (1992). Nematode parasites of vetebrates. Their Development and Transmission. CAB International, University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Anthony JP, Fyfe L, Smith H (2005). Plant active components—A resource for antiparasitic agents? Trends Parasitol. 21: 462–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2005.08.004[CrossRef]
Athanasiadou S, Githiori J, Kyriazakis I (2007). Medicinal plants for helminth parasites control: facts and fiction. Animal. 1(9): 1392-1400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107000730[CrossRef]
Bazh EK, El-Bahy NM (2013). In vitro and in vivo screening of anthelmintic activity of ginger and curcumin on Ascaridia galli. Parasitol. Res. 112(11): 3679-3686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3541-x[CrossRef]
Bhale S, Tuse T, Jadhav G (2011). In vitro anthelmintic activity of Annona reticulate leaves extract against Eisinia fetida. Int. J. Res. Pham. Sci. 2(4): 569-570.
Chakraborty D, Anisuzzaman, Shanta IS, Dey AR, Begum N, Mondal MMH (2008). In Vitro Efficacy of eleven Indigenous Plant Materials on the Inhibition of sporulation of oocysts of Eimeria tenella. Bangladesh Vet. J. 42(1-4): 48-58.
Chandrawathani P, Chang KW, Nurulaini R, Waller PJ, Adnan M, Zaini CM, Jamnah O, Khadijah S, Vincent N (2006). Daily feeding of fresh Neem leaves (Azadirachta indica) for worm control in sheep. Int. J. Oncol. 29(5): 1269-1278.
Fowler NG (1990). How to Carry Out a Field Investigation. In: Poultry Diseases, Jordan FTW (Ed.), Bailliere Tindall, London. Pp. 372-400.
Githiori JB, Hoglund J, Waller PJ, Baker RL (2004). Evaluation of anthelmintic properties of some plants used as livestock dewormers against Haemonchus contortus infections in sheep. J. Hazard Mater. 113: 97-109.
Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research Intl. Rice Res. Inst. John Wiley and Sons. New York, Brisbane, Tornoto, Singapjore. pp. 136-200.
Hordegen P, Hertzberg H, Heilmann J, Langhans W, Maurer V (2003). The anthelmintic efficacy of five plant products against gastrointestinal trichostrongylids in artificially infected lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 117(1-2): 51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.07.027[CrossRef]
Jeyathilakan N, Murali K, Anandaraj A, Basith (2012). In vitro evaluation of anthelmintic property of ethnoveterinary plant extracts against the liver fluke, Fasciola gigantica. J. Parasite. Dis. 36(1): 26-30.
Kiuchi F, Goto Y, Sugimoto N, Akao N, Kondo K, Tsuda Y (1993). Nematocidal activity of turmeric: synergistic action of curcuminoids. Chem. Pharmacol. Bull. (Tokyo), 41, 1640-1643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.41.1640[CrossRef]
Krishnadev N, Meleth AD, Chew E (2010). Nutritional supplements for age-related macular degeneration. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 21(3): 184 – 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32833866ee[CrossRef]
Kumar D, Mishra S, Tripathi HC (1991). Mechanism and action of benylisothiocyanate. Fitoterapi. 62(5): 403-410.
Lal J, Chandra S, Raviprakash V, Sabir M (1976). In vitro anthelmintic action of some indigenous medicinal plants on Ascaridia galli wonns. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 20(2): 64-68.
Lamtiur L (2000). Uji aktivitas anthelmintik infus Biji Pepaya (Carica papaya L.) terhadap Mencit putih (Mus musculus L.) galur swiss yang terinfeksi cacing Hemenolepis nana. Skripsi, Fakultas Farmasi Universitas, Agustus, Jakarta.
Lechat P, Bisseliches F, Dechy H (1978). Pharmacologie Medicale, 3rd ed. Masson, Paris, pp. 120-122.
Matter F, Oester H (1989). Hygiene and welfare implications of alternative husbandry systems for laying hens. In: The proceedings of the third European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, edited by Faure, J.M & Mills, A.D. Tours,; France 11-14th June.
Miron T, Rabinkov A, Mirelman D, Wilchek M, Weiner L (2000). The mode of action of allicin: Its ready permeability through phospholipid membranes may contribute to its biological activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1463: 20–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00174-1[CrossRef]
Mishra V, Parveen N, Singhal KC, Khan NU (2004). Antifilarial activity of Azadirachta indica on cattle filarial parasite Setaria cervi. Med. Vet. Entomol. 18(4): 449-452.
Murdiati TB, Beriajaya, Adiwinata G (1997). Aktivitas getah pepaya terhadap cacing Haemonchus contortus pada domba. Majalah Parasitologi Indonesia. 10: 1-7.
Oommen S, Anto RJ, Srinivas G, Karunagaran D (2004). Allicin (from garlic) induces caspace-mediated apoptosis in cancer cells. Euro. J. Pharmacol. 485: 97-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.11.059[CrossRef]
Patra G, Lyngdoh WM, Ali MA, Prava M, Chanu KV,Tolenkhomba TC, Das G, Prasad H, Devi LI, Devi IK (2010). Comparative anthelmintic efficacy of pineapple and neem leaves in broiler chickens experimentally infected with Ascaridia galli. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 9(12): 1120-1124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.1120.1124[CrossRef]
Permin A (1997). Helminths and helminthosis in poultry with special emphasis on Ascaridia galli in chickens. Ph.D. Thesis. Submitted to the Danish Center for Experimental Parasitology and Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark.
Rahman M (2002). In vitro and in vivo anthelmintic effects of some plants against gastro intestinal nematodes of goats. MS Thesis, Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.
Rubini D, Suhahar D, Anandarangopal K (2012). Phytochemical investigation and anthelmintic activity of Celosia cristata leaf extract. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 3(5): 335-337.
Russell DF (1986). MSTAT-C Package programme. Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan State University, USA.
Shalaby HA, Farag TK (2014). Body Surface Changes in Gastrointestinal Helminthes Following in vitro Treatment with Allium sativum Oil. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 5: 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000153[CrossRef]
Sharma V, Walia S, Kumar J, Nair MG, Parmar BS (2003). An efficient method for the purification and characterization of nematicidal azadirachtins A, B, and H, using MPLC and ESIMS. J. Plant Physiol. 160(5): 557-564.
Soulsby EJL (1982). Helmintlrs. Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. 7th edn. Baillire Tindall, London.
Szewczuk VD, Mongelli ER, Pomilio AB (2006). In vitro anthelmintic activity of Melia azadirach naturalized in Argentina. Phytother Res. 20(11): 993-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1929[CrossRef]
Tiwari P, Kumar B, Kaure M (2011). Phytochemical screening and extraction: A review. Int. Pharm. Sci. 1(1):98-106.
Velkers FC, Dieho K, Pecher FWM, JCM Vernooij, van Eck JHH, Landman WJM (2011). Efficacy of allicin from garlic against Ascaridia galli infection in chickens. Poult. Sci. 90: 364–368.

Services

Article usage statistics

Loading…

[1] Akhtar MS, Riffat S (1985). Evaluation of Melia azedarach Linn. seeds (Bakain) and piperazine against Ascaridia galli infection in chickens. Pak. Vet. J. 5: 34-37.

[2] Ali MA (2006). In vitro anthelmintic effects of some indigenous plants against Ascaridia galli of indigenous chikens. MS thesis. Submitted to the Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh., pp 44.

[3] Anderson RC (1992). Nematode parasites of vetebrates. Their Development and Transmission. CAB International, University Press, Cambridge, UK.

[4] Anthony JP, Fyfe L, Smith H (2005). Plant active components—A resource for antiparasitic agents? Trends Parasitol. 21: 462–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2005.08.004[CrossRef]

[5] Athanasiadou S, Githiori J, Kyriazakis I (2007). Medicinal plants for helminth parasites control: facts and fiction. Animal. 1(9): 1392-1400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107000730[CrossRef]

[6] Bazh EK, El-Bahy NM (2013). In vitro and in vivo screening of anthelmintic activity of ginger and curcumin on Ascaridia galli. Parasitol. Res. 112(11): 3679-3686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3541-x[CrossRef]

[7] Bhale S, Tuse T, Jadhav G (2011). In vitro anthelmintic activity of Annona reticulate leaves extract against Eisinia fetida. Int. J. Res. Pham. Sci. 2(4): 569-570.

[8] Chakraborty D, Anisuzzaman, Shanta IS, Dey AR, Begum N, Mondal MMH (2008). In Vitro Efficacy of eleven Indigenous Plant Materials on the Inhibition of sporulation of oocysts of Eimeria tenella. Bangladesh Vet. J. 42(1-4): 48-58.

[9] Chandrawathani P, Chang KW, Nurulaini R, Waller PJ, Adnan M, Zaini CM, Jamnah O, Khadijah S, Vincent N (2006). Daily feeding of fresh Neem leaves (Azadirachta indica) for worm control in sheep. Int. J. Oncol. 29(5): 1269-1278.

[10] Fowler NG (1990). How to Carry Out a Field Investigation. In: Poultry Diseases, Jordan FTW (Ed.), Bailliere Tindall, London. Pp. 372-400.

[11] Githiori JB, Hoglund J, Waller PJ, Baker RL (2004). Evaluation of anthelmintic properties of some plants used as livestock dewormers against Haemonchus contortus infections in sheep. J. Hazard Mater. 113: 97-109.

[12] Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research Intl. Rice Res. Inst. John Wiley and Sons. New York, Brisbane, Tornoto, Singapjore. pp. 136-200.

[13] Hordegen P, Hertzberg H, Heilmann J, Langhans W, Maurer V (2003). The anthelmintic efficacy of five plant products against gastrointestinal trichostrongylids in artificially infected lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 117(1-2): 51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.07.027[CrossRef]

[14] Jeyathilakan N, Murali K, Anandaraj A, Basith (2012). In vitro evaluation of anthelmintic property of ethnoveterinary plant extracts against the liver fluke, Fasciola gigantica. J. Parasite. Dis. 36(1): 26-30.

[15] Kiuchi F, Goto Y, Sugimoto N, Akao N, Kondo K, Tsuda Y (1993). Nematocidal activity of turmeric: synergistic action of curcuminoids. Chem. Pharmacol. Bull. (Tokyo), 41, 1640-1643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.41.1640[CrossRef]

[16] Krishnadev N, Meleth AD, Chew E (2010). Nutritional supplements for age-related macular degeneration. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 21(3): 184 – 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32833866ee[CrossRef]

[17] Kumar D, Mishra S, Tripathi HC (1991). Mechanism and action of benylisothiocyanate. Fitoterapi. 62(5): 403-410.

[18] Lal J, Chandra S, Raviprakash V, Sabir M (1976). In vitro anthelmintic action of some indigenous medicinal plants on Ascaridia galli wonns. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 20(2): 64-68.

[19] Lamtiur L (2000). Uji aktivitas anthelmintik infus Biji Pepaya (Carica papaya L.) terhadap Mencit putih (Mus musculus L.) galur swiss yang terinfeksi cacing Hemenolepis nana. Skripsi, Fakultas Farmasi Universitas, Agustus, Jakarta.

[20] Lechat P, Bisseliches F, Dechy H (1978). Pharmacologie Medicale, 3rd ed. Masson, Paris, pp. 120-122.

[21] Matter F, Oester H (1989). Hygiene and welfare implications of alternative husbandry systems for laying hens. In: The proceedings of the third European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, edited by Faure, J.M & Mills, A.D. Tours,; France 11-14th June.

[22] Miron T, Rabinkov A, Mirelman D, Wilchek M, Weiner L (2000). The mode of action of allicin: Its ready permeability through phospholipid membranes may contribute to its biological activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1463: 20–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00174-1[CrossRef]

[23] Mishra V, Parveen N, Singhal KC, Khan NU (2004). Antifilarial activity of Azadirachta indica on cattle filarial parasite Setaria cervi. Med. Vet. Entomol. 18(4): 449-452.

[24] Murdiati TB, Beriajaya, Adiwinata G (1997). Aktivitas getah pepaya terhadap cacing Haemonchus contortus pada domba. Majalah Parasitologi Indonesia. 10: 1-7.

[25] Oommen S, Anto RJ, Srinivas G, Karunagaran D (2004). Allicin (from garlic) induces caspace-mediated apoptosis in cancer cells. Euro. J. Pharmacol. 485: 97-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.11.059[CrossRef]

[26] Patra G, Lyngdoh WM, Ali MA, Prava M, Chanu KV,Tolenkhomba TC, Das G, Prasad H, Devi LI, Devi IK (2010). Comparative anthelmintic efficacy of pineapple and neem leaves in broiler chickens experimentally infected with Ascaridia galli. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 9(12): 1120-1124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.1120.1124[CrossRef]

[27] Permin A (1997). Helminths and helminthosis in poultry with special emphasis on Ascaridia galli in chickens. Ph.D. Thesis. Submitted to the Danish Center for Experimental Parasitology and Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark.

[28] Rahman M (2002). In vitro and in vivo anthelmintic effects of some plants against gastro intestinal nematodes of goats. MS Thesis, Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.

[29] Rubini D, Suhahar D, Anandarangopal K (2012). Phytochemical investigation and anthelmintic activity of Celosia cristata leaf extract. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 3(5): 335-337.

[30] Russell DF (1986). MSTAT-C Package programme. Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan State University, USA.

[31] Shalaby HA, Farag TK (2014). Body Surface Changes in Gastrointestinal Helminthes Following in vitro Treatment with Allium sativum Oil. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 5: 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000153[CrossRef]

[32] Sharma V, Walia S, Kumar J, Nair MG, Parmar BS (2003). An efficient method for the purification and characterization of nematicidal azadirachtins A, B, and H, using MPLC and ESIMS. J. Plant Physiol. 160(5): 557-564.

[33] Soulsby EJL (1982). Helmintlrs. Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. 7th edn. Baillire Tindall, London.

[34] Szewczuk VD, Mongelli ER, Pomilio AB (2006). In vitro anthelmintic activity of Melia azadirach naturalized in Argentina. Phytother Res. 20(11): 993-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1929[CrossRef]

[35] Tiwari P, Kumar B, Kaure M (2011). Phytochemical screening and extraction: A review. Int. Pharm. Sci. 1(1):98-106.

[36] Velkers FC, Dieho K, Pecher FWM, JCM Vernooij, van Eck JHH, Landman WJM (2011). Efficacy of allicin from garlic against Ascaridia galli infection in chickens. Poult. Sci. 90: 364–368.