Short Communication · Volume 51, Issue 1, 21 January 2019 · Open Access
Genetic Diversity and Geographic Differentiation in Northern Snakehead (Channa argus) Based on Mitochondrial Cyt b Gene
· · · · · · ·
Affiliations & Notes ⌄
- 1College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China 2School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528231, China 3Qingyuan North River Fishery Science Institute, Qingyuan 511510, Guangdong, China 4Qingyuan Fisheries Technology Limited Company, Qingyuan 511510, Guangdong, China , * Corresponding author: zoujixing@scau.edu.cn
Article Info ⌄
- Journal:
- Pakistan Journal of Zoology
- Published:
- 21 January 2019

Abstract
Materials and methods
All samples were identified according to morphological characters ; . Tissue samples were taken as fin clips and preserved in 95% ethanol. Basic information of sampling sites and size (n) of Channa species were given in Table I.
Table I.- Basic information of sampling sites and size (n) of Channa species.
| No. | Species | Location name | GPS coordinate | Altitude (m) | Date (size) |
| 1 | Biocolor type C. argus | Neijiang city, Sichuan province, China | 29°35'3.16"N, 105° 2'49.95"E | 332 | 2015(30) |
| 2 3 | White type C. argus | Neijiang city, Sichuan province, China | 29°34'14.64"N, 105° 4'1.95"E | 332 | 2014(19) |
| Ziyang city, Sichuan province, China | 30° 6'28.77"N, 104°38'39.46"E | 357 | 2014(11) | ||
| 4 | C. maculata | San Jiaozhen, Zhongshan city, Guangdong province, China | 22°39'14.31"N, 113°25'43.95"E | 1 | 2015(3) |
| 5 | C. maculata x C. argus | Guangzhou city, Guangdong province, China | 23° 5'43.82"N, 113°14'19.60"E | 3 | 2015(3) |
| 6 | C. asiatica | Guangzhou city, Guangdong province, China | 23° 5'48.06"N, 113°14'5.13"E | 3 | 2015(3) |
| 7 | C. micropeltes | Guangzhou city, Guangdong province, China | 23° 5'28.31"N, 113°14'1.34"E | 3 | 2015(2) |
| 8 | C. striata | Vientiane city, Laos | 17°57'52.27"N, 102°35'17.97"E | 167 | 2014(2) |
| 9 | C. lucius | Ha noi City, Vietnam | 21° 1'41.45"N, 105°51'48.94"E | 12 | 2014(2) |
Total genomic DNA was extracted from the caudal fin using a standard extraction kit (DNeasy tissue kit, Baitaike Biotech Co., Ltd., China). The amplified primers were given in follows, Cyt b-F: AAAACCACCGTTGTTATTC; Cyt b-R: GCTCTGACGCTGAGCTAC C. The sizes of the amplified fragment length was 1200 bp . The amplification reaction was carried out in 50 μl volumes consisting of 25 μl of 2× PCR mix buffer and 0.5 μl of 2.5U/μl Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., Japan), 2 μl of 100 ng/μl DNA template, 2 μl of 10 mM each primer and 18.5 μl ddH2O. Thermal cycling condition consisted of 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec, and an extension temperature of 72°C for 60 sec, and then followed by a final extension of 72°C for 10 min. The PCR product was purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Sequencing was conducted on an ABI377 automatic sequencer with both forward and reverse primers.
The nucleotide sequences of this study (KU852444-KU852447, KU852458-KU852460, KU852459, KT358955-KT358956) and GenBank database (LT577206, KC823607, KC774689, AP006042), were aligned using Clustal-X and then was edited and connected using BioEdit . DNAstar was used to estimate the number of haplotypes and its frequencies . The dendrogram of 12 populations was constructed using Kimura 2-parameter model (K2P) in MEGA 6.0 based on the pairwise genetic distance .
Results and discussion
A total of 1026 bp of fragments of Cyt b gene was sequenced for 75 individuals. All the sequences were aligned unambiguously with 807bp based on the sequences of other Chnannidae family species in the NCBI database. The variation sites (310), parsimony informative polymorphic sites (229) and conversion/transversion ratio (1.70) were obtained, which indicated that the nucleotide substitution did not reach saturation, these characteristics suggested that the mtDNA Cyt b gene could be used as an effective molecular marker to identify different Channidae species.
Table II.- Haplotype information of Cyt b gene among white and biocolor type C. argus.
| Haplotype | Populations (number of the haplotypes and its frequencies) | Common haplotype | ||||
| White type C. argus | Freq | Biocolor type C. argus | Freq | |||
| Cyt b | WtcaHB1 | 2 | 0.067 | WtcaHB2 and BtcaHB1 | ||
| WtcaHB2 | 27 | 0.9 | ||||
| WtcaHB3 | 1 | 0.033 | ||||
| BtcaHB1 | 30 | 1 | ||||
Note: WtcaH and BtcaH represent the haplotypes of white and biocolor type C. argus. B is Cyt b. The same as below.
Three haplotypes (WtcaHB1–B3) of white type C. argus and one haplotype (BtcaHB1) of biocolor type C. argus, were defined from 60 nucleotide sequences (Table II). The nucleotide sequences of all the test Channa species and haplotypes were submitted in GenBank. The sequences of both the haplotypes WtcaHB2 and BtcaHB1, had the largest distribution.
Considering Lateolabrax maculates and Epinephelus coioides as outgroups, sequences alignment via MEGA6.0, showed that all the haploids gather together as a branch and cross each other. Genetic distance was calculated based on the Kimura 2-parameter model. The result showed that the interspecific genetic distance was 0.000-0.248 among 12 kinds of Channidae species, while the maximum was 0.002 and the intraspecific genetic distance was 0.000 (Supplementary Table SI). Interspecific sequence difference is a prerequisite for accurate identification of species for different species of generic and species level . Previous research shows that the genetic distances within species are generally less than 0.020, and most are less than 0.010 in 11 phylums 13320 species of animals . In the present study, the intraspecific average genetic distance was 0.000 and the maximum genetic distances between different haplotypes was 0.002, which was less than 0.010, respectively. These indicate that the white and biocolor type C. argus have not yet reached the level of subspecies differentiation, and thus it may be able to correct the previous classification for the white type C. argus . Previous study also have found that the synonym phenomenon is extremely common in the subfamily species of Cynoglossidae, the genetic distance between Cynoglossus lighti and C. joyneri is merely 0.004, which is considered as same species of different morphological types .
Comparative analysis of the construction of NJ tree, which showed that all haplotypes were clustered into a single group with a high confidence value between the white and biocolor type C. argus (Fig. 1). As a gene sequence information, phylogenetic information can estimate the biological related group, genetic relationship or effective and reflect the size of the development information of a gene, and estimate the accuracy when constructing a phylogenetic tree . From molecular phylogenetic trees, we can see that all the selected Channidae species are clustered together, which was separated from the outgroups, and this was mainly reflected in the species level and above. Meanwhile, all haplotypes were clustered into one and cross each other. These results indicate that the white type should be served as an albino of biocolor type C. argus, which was consistent with the result of our previous studies , 2017), and the molecular marker has a certain application value in phylogenetic and germplasm analysis. In order to valid the present study and obtain more supportive data, molecular markers are recommended to be used for further comprehensive analysis.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2017A020225035); Produce-learn-research Project of Guangdong Province (2011B090400270); Fund Fostering Talents for Young Scholars of South China Agricultural University (201707N025); Talent introduction special funds of South China Agricultural University and Scientific Research Staring Foundation for Young Scholars of College of Marine Sciences. We also wish to express our appreciation to our anonymous reviewers for providing valuable comments on the manuscript.
Supplementary material
There is supplementary material associated with this article. Access the material online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.1.sc2
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
Figures

Molecular phylogenetic tree constructed by NJ method based on Cyt b gene using Kimura 2-parameter model. (High bootstrap values (>80%) in 1,000 resamplings are shown at the corresponding nodes).
References
- Awan, A.R., Firyal, S., Tayyab, M., Rukh, L., Zia ul Haq, M., Saeed, S. and Wasim, M., 2017. Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 283- 288.
- Berra, T.M., 2007. Freshwater fish distribution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226044439.001.0001[CrossRef]
- Bhat, A.A., Haniffa, M.A., Milton, M.J., Paray, B.A., Divya, P.R. and Gopalakrishnan, A., 2014. Int. J. Biodiv. Conserv., 6: 363-372. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2013.0649[CrossRef]
- Braby, M.F. and Zwick, A., 2015. Invertebr. System., 29: 487-509. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS15028[CrossRef]
- Cheng, Q.T. and Zheng, B.S., 1987. Systematic synopsis of Chinese fishes. Science Press, Beijing.
- Chen, S.J., He, C.B., Mu, Y.L., Liu, W.D., Zhou, Z.C., Gao, X.G. and Cong, L.L., 2008. J. Fish. Sci. China, 15: 12-21.
- Courtenay, W.R. and Williams, J.D., 2004. Snakeheads (Pisces, Channidae): A biological synopsis and risk assessment. US Geological Survey.
- Ding, R.H., 1994. The fishes of Sichuan, China, 1st edition. Sichuan Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, pp. 554.
- Excoffier, L., Laval, G. and Schneider, S., 2005. Evolut. Bioinform., 1: 47.
- Gao, J., Yue, L.L., Jiang, X., Ni, L., Ashraf, M.A., Zhou, Y., Li, K. and Xiao, J., 2017. Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 1185-1195.
- Hall, T.A., 1999. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser., 41: 95-98.
- Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A. and Ball, S.L., 2003. Proc. R. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci., 270: 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218[CrossRef]
- Kartavtsev, Y.P., Sharina, S.N., Saitoh, K., Imoto, J.M., Hanzawa, N. and Redin, A.D., 2016. Mitochondrial DNA, 27: 667-678. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2014.913139[CrossRef]
- Kim, S.J., Pak, S.J. and Ju, S.J., 2015. Mitochondrial DNA, 26: 127-128. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2013.861435[CrossRef]
- Kimura, S., 1934. J. Shanghai Sci. Inst., 3: 11-247.
- Liu, S.F., Liu, J.X., Zhuang, Z.M., Gao, T.X., Han, Z.Q. and Chen, D.G., 2010. Biodiv. Sci., 18: 275-282. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.275[CrossRef]
- Peng, J.L., Wang, X.Z., Wang, D. and He, S.P., 2009. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin., 2: 271-276. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1035.2009.00271[CrossRef]
- Shih, H.J., 1936. Bull. Fan. Mem. Inst. Biol. Peiping (Zool.), 7: 81-82.
- Takashima, S., Ise, H., Zhao, P., Akaike, T. and Nikaido, T., 2004. Cell Struct. Funct., 29: 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.29.73[CrossRef]
- Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. and Kumar, S., 2013. Mol. Biol. Evolut., 30: 2725-2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197[CrossRef]
- Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. and Higgins, D.G., 1997. Nucl. Acids Res., 25: 4876-4882. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876[CrossRef]
- Wang, J.X., Zhao, X.F., Zhuo, C.W. and Liao, Z.G., 1992. Trans. Oceanol. Limnol., 2: 51-57.
- Wang, J.X., Liao, Z.G., Zhang, Z.G. and Zhao, X.F., 1993. J. Southw. China Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2: 168-172.
- Zhou, A.G., Chen, J.T., Xie S.L., Chen, Y.F. and Zou, J.X., 2016. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 27: 1419-1420. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1101583[CrossRef]
- Zhou, A.G., Wang, C., Jiang, W.Z., Li, Z.G., Chen, Y.F., Xie, S.L., Luo, J.Z. and Zou, J.X., 2016. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 6: 1-3.
- Zhou, A.G., Xie, S.L., Wang, Z.L., Fan, L.F., Wang, C., Ye, Q., Chen, Y.F. and Zou, J.X., 2017. Mitochondrial DNA Part B, 2: 283-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2017.1325334[CrossRef]
Supplementary material
Cited by 1 article
In journals published by ResearchersLinks.
Services
Article usage statistics
Loading…
