Short Communication · Volume 50, Issue 4, 16 July 2018 · Open Access
Effect of supplementation of Oregano (Origanum onites) Dried Leaves on the Intestinal Properties in Japanese Quails
· · · · · · · ·
Affiliations & Notes ⌄
- 1Department of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore (CVAS, Jhang), Pakistan 2Department of Animal Nutrition, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03200, Turkey 3Department of Pathology, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03200, Turkey 4Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Bingol University, Bingol 12000, Turkey , * Corresponding author: abdurrehman@uvas.edu.pk
Article Info ⌄
- Journal:
- Pakistan Journal of Zoology
- Published:
- 16 July 2018

From the article
- Oregano-supplementation has shown potential effect on the gut morphology by improving the villus height, crypt depth and tunica muscularis thickness in the groups D, C and E, respectively.
- It is recommended to use upto 5% level of oregano dried leaves in the diet of quail to improve performance.
- It is suggested to investigate the potential of oregano extensively which could replace the use of antibiotics in poultry diets.
Selected from the article's own text.
Abstract
Materials and methods
Data was taken from the project No. 042VF11, which was conducted at the Animal Research Centre of Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey. In this study, a total of 180 day old quail birds were procured from a local reputed hatchery. Birds were divided into 6 groups having 30 birds in each. Each group was further subdivided into 6 subgroups having 5 birds in each. The study was conducted for 70 days.
A total of 6 different diets were formulated containing 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% dried oregano leaves and fed to groups A (Control), B, C, D, E and F, respectively. Dried oregano leaves were purchased from the reputed local market in Afyonkarahisar city. Diets were formulated isonitrogenic and isocaloric according to the recommendations of NRC (1994). Ingredient and chemical composition of diets mentioned in Table I.
Table I.- The ingredient and calculated nutrient/chemical composition of diets.
| Ingredient/ nutrients | Group A (control) | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | Group F |
| Maize | 34.70 | 37.00 | 34 | 36 | 35 | 34 |
| Wheat | 30.00 | 27.00 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 26 |
| Full fat soya bean | 9.40 | 10.00 | 14 | 10.50 | 13 | 17 |
| Soybean meal | 17.50 | 16.00 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 8 |
| Oregano leaves | - | 1.00 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Fish meal | 1.30 | 2.03 | 2 | 2.77 | 3.46 | 3.31 |
| Lime stone | 5.30 | 5.35 | 5.33 | 5.20 | 5.10 | 5.20 |
| DCP | 1.07 | 0.90 | .94 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.75 |
| Salt | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Vitamin premix* | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Mineral premix* | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Methionine | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Calculated composition | ||||||
| ME (MJ/kg) | 12.13 | 12.11 | 12.12 | 12.02 | 12.04 | 12.05 |
| DM (g/kg) | 89.10 | 89.20 | 89.20 | 89.10 | 89.10 | 89.20 |
| CP (g/kg) | 19.90 | 19.90 | 19.90 | 19.80 | 19.80 | 19.80 |
| CF (g/kg) | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.70 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.60 |
| Fat (g/kg) | 3.33 | 3.46 | 4.10 | 3.54 | 3.97 | 4.61 |
| Calcium (g/kg) | 2.47 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.49 |
| Available P (g/kg) | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Methionine + cystine (g/kg) | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
| Lysine (g/kg) | 1.19 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.13 |
| Linoleic acid | 1.60 | 1.70 | 2.00 | 1.70 | 1.90 | 2.20 |
*Levels of vitamin per 2.5 kg and mineral supplements per 1 kg product: Vit. A, 12 000.000 UI; Vit. D3, 2 000.000 UI; Vit. E, 35.000 mg; Vit. K3, 4000 mg; Vit. B1, 3000 mg; Vit. B2, 7.000 mg; Vit. B6, 5.000 mg; Vit. B12, 15 mg; niacin, 20.000 mg; D-Biotin, 45 mg; Apo Carotenoic acid ester, 500 mg; Folik Asit, 1 000 mg; Kolin Klorid, 125 000 mg; Vit. C, 50 000 mg; Kal D-Pantothenate, 10.000 mg; Ksanthaxantine, 1500 mg; copper, 5.000mg; cobalt, 200 mg; selenium, 150 mg; manganese, 80.000 mg; zinc, 60.000 mg; 2odine, 1.000 mg; iron, 60.000 mg; DL-Methionine, 99% pure; DCP, Dicalcium phosphate; ME, Metabolisable energy; DM, Dry matter; CP, Crude protein; CF, Crude Fiber. Groups A,B,C,D,E and F supplemented with 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% dried oregano leaves respectively.
Table II.- Effect of Oregano onites on the villus height, crypt depth and thickness of tunica muscularis in different experimental groups.
| Groups | ||||||
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
| Villus height | 683.29± 15.82bc | 519.56± 25.81a | 491.05± 27.72a | 761.99± 24.35d | 732.05± 25.40cd | 654.54± 16.79b |
| Crypt depth | 40.30± 1.26a | 50.91± 2.16b | 50.48± 1.96b | 73.25± 3.06e | 64.01± 2.23d | 57.14± 1.78c |
| Tunica muscularis thickness | 61.51± 1.21c | 57.38± 2.02bc | 69.87± 3.36d | 51.51± 1.73ab | 49.75± 1.89a | 51.79± 1.75ab |
a, b, c, d, Mean values of groups with different superscripts in same column differ significantly with each other (P<0.05).
For details of groups, see Table I.
A total of 36 birds were slaughtered, by picking one bird from each subgroup randomly, at the age of 70 days. Intestinal samples were collected for histopathological examination using previously described method by Awad et al. (2011). Different segments of intestine were collected for the measurement of villus height, crypt depth and tunica muscularis thickness. Collected samples were preserved for 48 h in 10% buffered formalin solution. Samples were cut and imbedded in paraffin for routine histological examinations. After imbedding, 4 micrometer section was cut from each block by microtome, mounted on slide and stained by hematoxylin and eosine (HE) as describe by Sakamoto et al. (2000) and Santos et al. (2005). Prepared slides were examined in a light microscope equipped with digital camera (Olympus CX41 attached Kameram R Digital Image Analyze System) from different 10 places for each parameters in each slide. The villus height was taken from top of the villus upto the lamina propria . Crypt depth was analyzed between the crypt and villus while mucosa (Muscularis thickness) was measured from the top of villus to the base of the muscularis mucosa .
Data was subjected to ANOVA for a completely randomized design . Duncan’s multiple range test was used to check the mean differences.
Results and discussion
Gut morphology plays an important role in the proper digestion and utilization of feed nutrients. Better digestion will ultimately reduce the cost of production by improving the feed conversion ratio (FCR) . In the current years, the use of natural herbal products in the poultry diet is being explored and evaluated to enhance the production performance of birds. Researchers have paid enormous efforts to investigate the potential of phytogenics to be used as alternative of antibiotics ; . The results of current study indicated that villus height was significantly lesser (P<0.05) in groups B, C, and F, which were supplemented with 1%, 2% and 5% oregano leaves, respectively, however it was surprisingly observed higher (P<0.05) in group D, which was supplemented with 3% oregano leaves as compared to control group A as shown in Table II. In this study, oregano dried leaves have revealed that supplementation of feed with oregano leaves resulted in improved villus height. This result is supported by Jamroz et al. (2006) who showed that phytogenic extract supplementation has pronounced impact on the performance in improving villus height of intestine. It is noteworthy to mention that increased villus height is also responsible for the better performance by improving surface area and absorption of nutrients .
Many intestinal parameters are involved in digestive processes which are correlated with each other to support and enhance the performance and better feed utilization of nutrients. Crypt depth is also playing a vital role in surface area and gut functioning. In the current study, crypt depth showed higher value (P<0.05) in all groups compared to control, having highest crypt depth in group D supplemented with 3% oregano leaves. Likewise, in previous studies ; ; Çabuk et al., 2006; , it has been observed that feed conversion ratio (FCR) was improved in the oregano oil supplemented groups which favors the concept that improvement in FCR might have resulted from improved gut morphology.
Passage rate of digesta determines the rate of absorption of nutrients from the intestine into the blood. Tunica muscularis is also responsible for the integrity and normal passage rate of digesta. In this study, muscularis thickness was shown higher (P<0.05) in groups C, D, E and F, while group B demonstrated non-significant (P>0.05) difference as compared to group A. Similarly, in other studies it has been proved that the supplementation of herbal extract (mixture of oils and dried material) resulted in improved growth rate, FCR, feed intake and overall performance through improvement of gut morphology ; ; .
Conclusion
Oregano-supplementation has shown potential effect on the gut morphology by improving the villus height, crypt depth and tunica muscularis thickness in the groups D, C and E, respectively. It is recommended to use upto 5% level of oregano dried leaves in the diet of quail to improve performance. It is suggested to investigate the potential of oregano extensively which could replace the use of antibiotics in poultry diets.
Acknowledgment
This Project was supported by the Scientific Research Committee of AKU (Project No: 042VF11).
Statement of conflict of interest
Authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
- Alçiçek, A., Bozkurt, M. and Çabuk, M., 2004. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 34: 217-222.
- Aptekmann, K.P., Baraldi-Arton, S.M., Stefanini, M.A. and Orsi, M.A., 2001. Anat. Histol. Embryol., 30: 277-280. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0264.2001.00331.x[CrossRef]
- Awad, W., Ghareeb, K. and Böhm, J., 2008. Int. J. mol. Sci., 9: 2205-2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms9122505[CrossRef]
- USDA, 2015. http://search.ers.usda.gov/search?affiliate=ers&query=total%20meat%20production
- Awad, W.A., Ghareeb, K. and Böhm, J., 2011. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 95: 65-72.
- Caspary, W.F., 1992. Am. J. clin. Nutr., 55: 299S-308S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/55.1.299s[CrossRef]
- Chun, S.S., Dhiraj, A., Vattem, Y.L. and Kalidas, S., 2005. Proccess Biochem., 40: 809-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.02.018[CrossRef]
- Cabuk, M., Bozkurt, M., Alcicek, A., Akbas, Y. and Kucukyılmaz, K., 2006. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 36: 135-141. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v36i2.3996[CrossRef]
- Cetingul, I.S., Bayram, I., Yardimci, M., Sahin, E.H., Sengor, E., Akkaya, A.B. and Uyarlar, C., 2007. Arch. Zootech., 10: 57-65.
- Cetingul, I.S., Bayram, I., Yardimci, M., Sahin, E.H., Sengor, E., Akkaya, A.B. and Uyarlar, C., 2009. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 8: 131-142. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.131[CrossRef]
- Duncan, D.B., 1955. Biometrics, 11: 1-1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478[CrossRef]
- Dragland, S., Senoo, H., Wake, K., Holte, K. and Blomhoff, R., 2003. Nutrition, 133: 1286-1290.
- Denli, M., Okan, F. and Uluocak, A.N., 2004. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 34: 174-179. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v34i2.3812[CrossRef]
- Jamroz, D., Wertelecki, T., Houszka, M. and Kamel, C., 2006. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 90: 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00603.x[CrossRef]
- Jang, I.S., Ko, Y.H., Yang, H.Y., Ha, J.S., Kim, J.Y., Kang, S.Y., Yoo, D.H., Nam, D.S., Kim, D.H. and Lee, C.Y., 2004. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 17: 394-400. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.394[CrossRef]
- Lee, K.W., Everts, H., Kappert, H.J., Frehner, M., Losa, R. and Beynen, A.C., 2003. Br. Poult. Sci., 44: 450-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085508[CrossRef]
- NRC, 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 27-31.
- Nychas, G.J.E., 1995. In: New methods of food preservation (ed. G.W. Gould). Blackie Academic Professional, London, pp. 58-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2105-1_4[CrossRef]
- Parlat, S.S., Yildiz, A.O., Olgun, O. and Cufadar, Y., 2005. J. Selçuk Univ. Agric. Facul., 19: 7-12.
- Rafeeq, M., Rashid, N., Tariq, M.M., Tareen, R.B., Ullah, A. and Mustafa, Z., 2017. Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 1063-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.3.1063.1069[CrossRef]
- Runnie, I., Salleh, M.N., Mohameda, S., Headb, R.J. and Abeywardena, M.Y., 2004. J. Ethnopharmacol., 92: 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.03.019[CrossRef]
- Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. and Dickey, D.A., 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrial approach, 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, USA, pp. 481.
- Santos, F.S., Tellez, G., Farnell, M.B., Balog, J.M., Anthony, N.B., Pavlidis, H.O. and Donoghue, A.M., 2005. Poult. Sci., 84: 1495-1498. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.9.1495[CrossRef]
- Sakamoto, K., Hirose, H., Onizuka, A., Hayashi, M., Futamura, N., Kawamura, Y. and Ezaki, T., 2000. J. Surg. Res., 94: 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2000.5937[CrossRef]
- Tarachai, P. and Yamauchi, K., 2000. Poult. Sci., 79: 1578-1585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.11.1578[CrossRef]
- Teixeira, B., António, M., Cristina, R., Carmo, S., Olívia, M., Nuno, N.R., José, N.M.F., Alexandre, S.J. and Leonor, N.M., 2013. J. Sci. Fd. Agric., 93: 2707-2714. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6089[CrossRef]
- Yesilbag, S.S., Gezen, H., Biricik, H. and Bulbul, T., 2012. Br. Poult. Sci., 53: 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.654763[CrossRef]
- Wang, R.D. and Bourne, S., 1998. Biotechnology in the feed industry. In: Proc. Altech’s 14th Annual Symposium Altech Technical Publications Nottingham University Press. Nicholasville, K.Y., pp. 273-292.
Services
Article usage statistics
Loading…
