Research Article · Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 194–202, 13 January 2021 · Open Access
Dose-Response Effect of Exogenous Enzymes Treatment of Tomato and Watermelon Crop Byproducts on In vitro Nutrient Degradability and Rumen Fermentation Kinetics
Herein, the untreated WCB and TCB showed significantly lower SCFA, MCP, OMD, DMD, CFD, CPD, and energy content, but higher PF compared with berseem hay.
Our findings showed that ENZ addition to TCB and WCB resulted in a significant linear increase in SCFA, ME, NE, MCP, and OMD.
The low nutritional content of both crop residues resulted in dwindling in the in vitro gas production, nutrient degradability, and the energy content (ME and NE).
However, WCB and TCB treatment with ENZ, especially at 24 mg/g DM, enhanced gas production and energy content and DM, CP, and CF degradation compared with untreated ones.
Selected from the article's own text.
Abstract
Mohamed M. Abd-Elkerem, Sabry M. Bassiony, Sabry A. Shehata, Adham A. Al-Sagheer*
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.
Abstract | This study aimed to investigate the potential of exogenous enzymes treatment of tomato and watermelon crop byproducts (TCB and WCB, respectively) on gas production, rumen fermentation characteristics, and feed degradability using in vitro gas production method. Four different concentrations (0, 6, 12, and 24 mg/g) of ENZ were added with the substrate (TCB and WCB) inside the incubation tubes. Berseem hay substrate was used as a positive control. The results of chemical analyses of TCB and WCB showed that most of the nutrients are lower than those in berseem hay. The untreated WCB and TCB displayed a significant reduction in cumulative gas production (GP), microbial crude protein, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), nutrient degradability, net energy (NE), and metabolizable energy (ME) contents. Still, they increased the partitioning factor value in comparison with berseem hay. However, increased GP, SCFA, ME, and NE with increasing ENZ levels were observed in both crop residues with a significant effect at the level of 24 mg/g. Also, the application of ENZ enhanced the degradation of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), and crude fiber (CF) compared with untreated WCB and TCB. All ENZ levels did not elicit any significant alterations in the ruminal pH, NH3–N concentration, and protozoa count. Conclusively, the results suggest that treatment of crop residues with ENZ, especially at 24 mg/g DM, could have the potential to improve the efficiency of feed utilization fed to ruminants, as evidenced by better gas production, in vitro DM, CF, and CP degradability.
Byproducts from agriculture may be of importance not only for reducing nutrition costs but also to reduce environmental problems associated with byproduct accumulation . Most of these biomaterials are not used and end up in municipal sites, where microbial breakdown and leachate production produce severe environmental challenges. Thus, the use of agricultural byproducts in ruminant nutrition has been virtually adopted as an approach for minimizing the expense of feeding and reducing the need to recycle wastes, which its disposal is costly . Fibrous feeds contain high cellulose and hemicellulose content, making a complex with lignin and carbohydrates to decrease the carbohydrates’ digestibility and decrease the utilization of ruminants from forages. Improvement of fibrous feeds digestibility is generally very desirable and leads to better animal productivity. Degradation of plant cell walls of high fiber feed in the rumen is possible principally because of the produced enzymes of rumen microflora . Numerous studies have focused on enhancing the efficiency of fibrous feeds degradation in the rumen using physical, chemical, and biological treatment such as yeast products, exogenous fiber degrading enzymes, and inoculants .
As an effective treatment strategy, exogenous enzymes have attracted worldwide growing interest and proved to be a useful tool to improve ruminant production (Beauchemin et al., 2019). The enhancement in the nutritive value of fibrous feeds by exogenous fiber enzymes treatment may be due to increasing attachment by rumen bacteria (Wang et al., 2001). Moreover, the enzymes act synergistically with the rumen microbes, which increases their ability to hydrolytic the fiber in the rumen (Beauchemin et al., 2004). ZAD® is a commercial product prepared from anaerobic bacteria, which by particular enzymes convert polysaccharides into monosaccharides (Salem et al., 2013). The ZADO® enzyme mixture contains α-amylase, xylanase, endoglucanase, and protease. This enzyme mixture has been used in previous studies to improve microbial crude protein synthesis, ruminal fermentation parameters, nutrient digestibility, and milk production (Gado et al., 2009, López et al., 2013, Salem et al., 2013).
Therefore, this in vitro study aimed to evaluate the ZADO® enzyme mixture’s dose-response effect on the gas production, nutrient degradability, and rumen fermentation characteristics of two crop residues of tomato and watermelon.In particular, no study, to our knowledge, has considered the nutritional assessment of two highly available crops byproducts treated with exogenous enzyme mixture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The current study was accompanied by the Animal Nutrition Laboratory, Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Plant byproducts and chemical analysis
Samples of tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) crop byproducts (TCB and WCB, respectively) were manually collected from a private farm in Zagazig, Egypt. Plant byproducts were weighed, wholly cut, dried at 65 °C to about 90 % dry matter (DM), and finely powdered (1 mm). These dried samples were used for chemical analysis and in vitro experiment. The sample was analyzed for organic matter (OM), DM, crude fiber (CF), ash, ether extract, and crude protein (CP) according to the AOAC (2006). Estimate the concentration of elements in the sample by atomic absorption device (iCE 3000 Series AAS), according to Elmer and Conn (1982). Estimate the concentration of phosphorus element by element appreciation chromatography device, according to Marker (1992). The chemical and mineral composition of TCB and WCB compared with berseem hay are listed in Table 1.
Enzyme mixture and additive dose
The used exogenous enzyme (ZADO®) was kindly provided by Dr. Hany Gado, Professor of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. ZADO® is a multi-enzyme powder (Patent No.: 22155, Cairo, Egypt), commercially available, manufactured by the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology in Egypt from Ruminococcus flavefaciens bacteria. The enzyme mixture has been examined for enzymatic activities and was found to contain (per g of enzyme) 61.5 units ofα-amylase, 7.1 units of endoglucanase, 29.2 units of protease, and 2.3 units of xylanase activity. Four doses of exogenous enzymes (0, 6, 12, and 24 mg per g DM) were added with the substrate (TCB and WCB) inside the incubation tubes. Berseem hay substrate was used as a positive control.
In vitro incubations
The ruminal liquid was collected from a slaughtered cow from a slaughterhouse located at Zagazig, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Rumen liquids were immediately transported to the laboratory in pre-warmed (39 °C) isolate flasks and kept under anaerobic environments. The rumen fluid was filtered through four layers of cheesecloth and incubated at 39 °C in a water bath, and it was saturated with CO2 until inoculation.
The buffer incubation medium (MB9) contained CaCl2 (0.1g/l), NaCl (2.8g/l), MgSO4.7H2O (0.1g/l), KH2PO4.H2O (2g/l), and Na2HPO4 (6g/l). The rumen fluid was mixed with the MB9 media at the MB9 media ratio to rumen fluid of 2:1 (v/v). Thirty millimeters of mixed ruminal fluid was introduced into calibrated glass tubes, containing 200 mg of the byproducts + dose of ZADO® (ENZ), quickly closed by a gas release rubber stopper fitted with a tri-way valve coupled with a calibrated plastic syringe to measure the gas production. The volume of gas production was measured at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h of incubation. The total gas volume was corrected from a blank tube. Three runs of gas production were conducted for all substrates. In each run as four blank bottles (without substrate) and six bottles for each treatment. Gas production kinetics were calculated following the model of Ørskov and McDonald (1979).
The contents of three tubes of each treatment were used for determining truly degraded dry matter (DMD) after 72 h of incubation by adding 30 mL of neutral detergent solution to each bottle and placed at 105 °C for three h. Then, each sample was filtered through pre-weighed Gooch crucibles, dried at 105°C for three h, and the residual DM weight was estimated . After that, it was used to estimate crude protein and crude fiber degradability (CPD and CFD), according to AOAC (2006). The concentration of NH3-N, total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), and protozoa count were determined in the contents of another three tubes of each treatment. The protozoa count
Table 1: Analyzed nutrient and minerals contents of tested substrates.
Berseem hay
Watermelon (whole plant byproduct)
Tomato (whole plant byproduct)
Chemical composition (% on DM basis)
Crude protein
15.70
10.08
8.55
Crude fiber
25.18
36.39
26.90
Ether extract
4.15
2.40
2.04
Organic matter
88.30
79.09
82.18
Ash
11.70
20.91
18.82
Nitrogen free extract
43.27
30.22
43.69
Mineral composition (on DM basis)
Calcium, %
1.45
1.02
0.073
Potassium, %
2.32
0.112
0.111
Phosphorus, %
0.262
0.008
0.006
Magnesium, %
0.290
0.032
0.024
Copper, ppm
15.18
0.822
0.646
Zinc, ppm
20.25
2.939
1.3416
Iron, ppm
178.2
42.69
17.99
Chromium, ppm
0.520
0.6154
0.4103
Table 2: Effect of various exogenous enzyme (ENZ) doses addition to watermelon crop byproducts (WCB) on cumulative gas production kinetics, predicted values, and fermentation parameter compared with berseem hay as a positive control
Berseem hay
ENZ levels added to WCB substrate
SEM
P-value
0 g/kg-1
6 g/kg-1
12 g/kg-1
24 g/kg-1
T
L
Q
Gas production, ml/g DM
3 h
37.00ab
30.17b
32.07b
39.06ab
48.13a
1.58
0.0001
0.0001
0.200
6 h
59.25ab
42.75c
47.21bc
53.56abc
65.56a
2.02
0.0001
0.0001
0.236
12 h
86.38a
59.50b
69.43ab
77.83ab
86.50a
2.64
0.0001
0.0001
0.870
24 h
110.38ab
95.54b
102.79ab
107.44ab
119.13a
2.42
0.009
0.0001
0.536
36 h
127.88ab
119.88b
128.00ab
131.78ab
143.38a
2.45
0.015
0.0001
0.631
48 h
141.38ab
132.88b
137.00b
140.94ab
157.69a
2.87
0.039
0.001
0.001
72 h
151.63ab
143.71b
147.00b
148.89b
168.44a
2.85
0.032
0.002
0.108
a
18.63ab
14.06b
14.24b
21.20ab
32.89a
1.88
0.003
0.0001
0.079
b
139.11
143.66
141.19
135.72
146.76
3.00
0.813
0.992
0.227
c
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.002
0.124
0.160
0.015
a+b
157.74
157.72
155.44
156.92
179.65
3.20
0.079
0.025
0.042
Predicted values
SCFA, mmol /0.2g DM
0.62a
0.42c
0.45bc
0.47bc
0.51b
0.011
<0.001
0.001
0.978
ME (MJ/kg DM)
5.54a
4.14c
4.39bc
4.52bc
4.75b
0.080
<0.001
0.001
0.978
NEL (MJ/kg DM)
3.18a
2.56c
2.69bc
2.84bc
2.99b
0.059
<0.001
0.001
0.978
OMD, %
47.83a
36.46c
37.85bc
38.58bc
39.89b
0.554
<0.001
0.001
0.978
MCP (mg/g DM)
751.38a
605.34b
638.61b
665.80b
660.47b
11.87
<0.001
0.024
0.936
PF (mg TDOM/ml gas)
1.71b
1.92a
1.84ab
1.80ab
1.76ab
0.019
<0.001
0.001
0.658
Fermentation
parameters
pH (24 h)
6.21
6.20
5.89
5.81
5.80
0.07
0.092
0.041
0.244
pH (48 h)
6.21
6.21
6.01
5.95
5.88
0.05
0.085
0.009
0.371
pH (72 h)
5.40
5.50
5.60
5.30
5.30
1.65
0.098
0.521
0.106
Ammonia-N, mg/dL
41.07
34.16
36.55
36.40
33.25
1.15
0.327
0.862
0.305
TVFA, ml eq./L
167.67
154.60
203.75
218.50
193.00
12.09
0.442
0.270
0.208
Protozoa count, 103/mL
164.83b
198.00ab
235.00a
233.75a
198.75ab
8.19
0.038
0.855
0.037
Means in the same row bearing different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05); SEM indicates standard error of the mean; Probability of main effects of treatment (T), linear (L), and quadratic (Q); a = the gas production from the immediately soluble fraction (ml); b = the gas production from the insoluble fraction (ml); c = the gas production rate constant for the insoluble fraction b (h); a+b = potential gas production (ml);ME, metabolizable energy; NEL, net energy lactation; OMD, organic matter degradability; PF, partitioning factor at 72 h of incubation; SCFA, short-chain fatty acids; MCP, microbial crude protein production; TVFA is the total volatile fatty acids.
was estimated microscopically after sample preparation in line with the method of Kamra et al. (1991). The TVFA concentration was estimated by the steam distillation method, according to Warner (1964). Ruminal NH3-N concentration was detected according to the method described by Conway (1957). At 24 h of incubation, the partitioning factor (PF) was calculated as the ratio of OM (mg) degradability to the volume of gas production (in mL after 24 h) . Net energy lactation (NEL, MJ/kg DM) and metabolizable energy (ME, MJ/kg DM) were calculated according to Menke and Steingass (1988). The calculation of the in vitro organic matter digestibility (OMD %) was accomplished according to Menke et al. (1979) equation. Short chain fatty acid concentrations (SCFA) were calculated according to Getachew et al. (2002). Microbial CP biomass production was estimated, according to Blümmel et al. (1997).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of the in vitro results was conducted using the general linear model procedure (GLM) using SPSS 21 (Chicago, IL) software. The orthogonal polynomial contrast was applied to identify the linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of increasing exogenous enzyme levels. Tukey’s test was used to test the significant differences (at P < 0.05) between the means.
RESULTS
Watermelon crop byproducts
Data presented in Table 2 exhibited no significant differences in gas production kinetics, TVFA, NH3-N, pH, and protozoal count between untreated WCB and berseem hay. In contrast, a significant reduction in predicted NE, SCFA, ME, MCP, and OMD, but a significant increase in PF, were observed in the untreated WCB group compared to the berseem hay (Table 2). The addition of ENZ led to a linear increase (P<0.001) in cumulative gas production, gas production from a soluble fraction (a), and the predicted value of ME, NE, SCFA, and OMD with increasing dietary ENZ levels. The highest values were observed in diet fortified with ENZ at 24 g/ kg compared with un-supplemented WCB. All concentrations of the tested ENZ did not alter the ruminal NH3-N, TVFA, pH, and protozoal count (Table 2).
At all incubation periods, DMD, CFD, and CPD for untreated WCB were significantly lower (P<0.001) than that for berseem hay (Table 3). However, the application of ENZ at 24 g/kg improved (P<0.01) the degradation of CF and CP after 72 h of incubation compared with untreated WCB (Table 2). Also, the highest (P=0.001) value of DMD was detected in WCB treated with 12 and 24 g/kg of ENZ after 24h but not at 48 and 72h of incubation (Table 3).
Tomato crop byproducts
As shown in Table 4, cumulative gas production (12-72h of incubation) was significantly (P<0.001) reduced in untreated TCB compared with berseem hay substrate. Also, a significant decrease in the predicted value of ME, NE, SCFA, MCP, and OMD, but a significant increase in PF, were detected in the un-supplemented WCB substrate compared to those in berseem hay. Incubation of TCB substrate with ENZ resulted in a linear increase in cumulative gas production (3-72h of incubation) with a significant effect at the level of 24 g/kg (Table 4). Predicted values of ME, NE, SCFA, MCP, and OMD showed a linear increase at the addition of ENZ to the incubation media containing TCB relative to the untreated one. Notably, the highest significant effect on the earlier parameters was evident at the level of 24 g/kg. Nevertheless, a linear decrease was recorded in the PF when the incubation media containing TCB was fortified with ENZ with a significant effect at 12 and 24 g/kg. The values of pH, NH3-N, TVFA, and protozoa were not significantly altered by the ENZ treatment (Table 4).
A significant reduction in DMD (after 48 and 72h), CFD
Table 3: Effect of various exogenous enzyme (ENZ) doses addition to watermelon crop byproducts (WCB) on nutrient degradability after 24, 48, and 72 hours of incubation compared with berseem hay as a positive control.
Berseem hay
ENZ levels added to WCB substrate
SEM
P-value
0 g/kg-1
6 g/kg-1
12 g/kg-1
24 g/kg-1
T
L
Q
Dry matter degradability (%) after
24 h
39.00a
32.97c
34.48bc
37.37ab
37.42ab
0.64
0.001
0.001
0.313
48 h
55.18a
40.15b
40.07b
42.22b
42.92b
1.64
<0.001
0.911
0.217
72 h
59.96a
44.89b
47.83b
50.68b
50.98b
1.21
<0.001
0.015
0.372
Crude fiber degradability (%) after
24 h
21.14a
6.21c
6.75bc
7.53bc
9.83b
1.51
<0.001
0.011
0.082
48 h
32.66a
9.24c
13.48bc
18.77bc
20.20b
2.25
<0.001
0.004
0.525
72 h
36.98a
10.30d
20.2c
27.70bc
30.85ab
2.20
<0.001
0.000
0.143
Crude protein degradability (%) after
24 h
44.00ab
38.88b
43.35ab
43.68ab
46.48a
0.88
0.041
0.007
0.579
48 h
58.41ab
45.93c
53.01bc
58.04ab
62.77a
1.70
0.001
0.000
0.468
72 h
68.09a
57.50c
59.03bc
59.80bc
64.49ab
1.04
0.001
0.093
0.103
Means in the same row bearing different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05); SEM indicates standard error of the mean; Probability of main effects of treatment (T), linear (L), and quadratic (Q).
Table 4: Effect of various exogenous enzyme (ENZ) doses addition to tomato crop byproduct (TCB) on cumulative gas production kinetics, predicted values, and fermentation parameter compared with berseem hay as a positive control
Berseem hay
ENZ levels added to TCB substrate
SEM
P-value
0 g/kg-1
6 g/kg-1
12 g/kg-1
24 g/kg-1
T
L
Q
Gas production, ml/g DM
3 h
46.38b
36.88b
51.75ab
51.06b
66.83a
2.16
<0.001
<0.001
0.978
6 h
68.25ab
51.44b
65.80b
63.72b
85.25a
2.51
<0.001
<0.001
0.472
12 h
102.63ab
71.06c
85.70bc
84.11bc
109.50a
2.85
<0.001
<0.001
0.254
24 h
140.50a
107.31b
119.85ab
119.33ab
137.75a
2.89
0.001
0.001
0.646
36 h
163.63a
128.38b
137.95b
141.44ab
162.92a
3.18
0.001
0.001
0.328
48 h
178.00a
138.44c
147.25bc
155.78abc
170.50ab
3.57
0.004
0.003
0.674
72 h
184.50a
151.13b
160.50ab
167.50ab
183.92a
3.49
0.010
0.003
0.627
a
21.14b
19.95b
35.67ab
36.19ab
50.98a
2.70
0.001
<0.000
0.792
b
157.77
140.70
133.05
146.27
143.25
3.49
0.358
0.492
0.647
c
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.002
0.542
0.987
0.632
a+b
178.91
160.65
168.72
182.45
194.23
4.26
0.113
0.006
0.806
Predicted values
SCFA, mmol /0.2 g DM
0.62a
0.46b
0.54ab
0.55a
0.61a
0.01
<0.001
<0.001
0.434
ME (MJ/kg DM)
5.52a
4.36c
4.91bc
5.00ab
5.39ab
0.09
<0.001
<0.001
0.434
NEL (MJ/kg DM)
2.90a
2.05c
2.45bc
2.52ab
2.81ab
0.07
<0.001
<0.001
0.434
OMD, %
47.74a
39.42c
42.53bc
43.07b
45.27ab
0.55
<0.001
<0.001
0.434
MCP (mg/g DM)
759.66a
632.24b
721.75a
710.14a
716.99a
10.10
<0.001
0.010
0.073
PF (mg TDOM/ml gas)
1.71b
1.89a
1.75ab
1.72 b
1.65b
0.02
<0.001
<0.001
0.243
Fermentation parameters
pH (24 h)
6.43a
5.80b
5.80b
5.85b
5.77b
0.06
<0.001
0.877
0.369
pH (48 h)
6.42a
6.10ab
5.96b
5.96b
6.04b
0.05
0.008
0.480
0.074
pH (72 h)
5.48
5.59
5.56
5.65
5.54
0.033
0.722
0.870
0.625
Ammonia-N, mg/dL
40.73b
46.58ab
46.90ab
43.30ab
52.80a
1.39
0.041
0.165
0.102
TVFA, ml eq./L
165.00
223.25
218.25
208.25
246.60
10.39
0.196
0.496
0.347
Protozoa count, 103/mL
170.67b
177.38ab
241.88a
164.13b
170.90ab
9.18
0.021
0.189
0.115
Means in the same row bearing different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05); SEM indicates standard error of the mean; Probability of main effects of treatment (T), linear (L), and quadratic (Q); a = the gas production from the immediately soluble fraction (ml); b = the gas production from the insoluble fraction (ml); c = the gas production rate constant for the insoluble fraction b (h); a+b = potential gas production (ml); ME, metabolizable energy; NEL, net energy lactation; OMD, organic matter degradability; PF, partitioning factor at 72 h of incubation; SCFA, short-chain fatty acids; MCP, microbial crude protein production; TVFA is the total volatile fatty acids.
Table 5: Effect of various exogenous enzyme (ENZ) doses addition to tomato crop byproduct (TCB) on nutrient degradability after 24, 48, and 72 hours of incubation compared with berseem hay as a positive control.
Berseem hay
ENZ levels added to TCB substrate
SEM
P-value
0 g/kg-1
6 g/kg-1
12 g/kg-1
24 g/kg-1
T
L
Q
Dry matter degradability (%) after,
24 h
40.37
36.73
37.83
38.44
38.28
0.86
0.833
0.565
0.756
48 h
54.30a
46.61c
49.89bc
50.95ab
54.19a
0.77
<0.001
<0.001
0.985
72 h
60.30a
47.69b
56.32a
56.36a
57.67a
1.02
<0.001
0.019
0.117
Crude fiber degradability (%) after
24 h
25.80a
14.37b
20.71a
22.20a
24.97a
1.08
<0.001
<0.001
0.007
48 h
34.32ab
25.54b
31.49ab
33.81ab
35.88a
1.21
0.031
<0.001
0.244
72 h
36.86ab
30.36b
34.23b
36.07b
47.67a
1.66
0.003
0.001
0.351
Crude protein degradability (%) after
24 h
46.75
46.34
49.19
50.54
53.37
0.90
0.057
0.012
0.099
48 h
60.41ab
49.77b
56.32ab
59.12ab
63.64a
1.65
0.004
<0.001
0.844
72 h
67.26a
55.35b
64.15a
64.15a
65.84a
1.04
<0.001
0.008
0.055
Means in the same row bearing different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05); SEM indicates standard error of the mean; Probability of main effects of treatment (T), linear (L), and quadratic (Q).
(after 24h), and CPD (after 72h) were evident in untreated TCB compared to berseem hay (Table 5). Treatment of TCB with ENZ displayed a linear increment in the DMD, CFD, and CPD. In particular, after 72h of incubation, a significant effect was apparent on the degradability of both DM and CP at 6, 12, and 24 g/kg of ENZ, while CFD was significantly affected at 24 g/kg (Table 5).
DISCUSSION
For enhancement of livestock productivity with minimal environmental impact, several nutritional strategies have been developed in recent years, like the use of plant byproduct and natural feed additives , , . Herein, two types of crop residues treated with exogenous enzyme were assessed for the efficiency in enhancing feed degradability in ruminants. The results of decreased gas production of untreated TCB (12-72h of incubation) and WCB (6-12 h of incubation) is in line with the findings of Sallam et al. (2007). These authors found a significant decrease in gas production from linseed straw and rice straw compared to berseem hay. This finding might be related to the low feeding value of these crop residues. Haddi et al. (2003) noted a significant negative correlation between the rate of gas production and fiber contents (NDF and ADF) of the plant. The negative influence of fiber content on gas production might be related to the decreased ruminal microbes’ activity through the lack of suitable environmental conditions for fermentation as incubation time progresses .
Our observations of increased gas production with increasing ENZ levels at all the incubation times in both crop residues are in harmony with numerous studies , . This response might be due to the Ruminococcus flavefaciens content of the ENZ that stimulate ruminal microbial fermentation. Also, increased gas production up to 72 h of incubation period due to ENZ supplementation may reflect the increase in microbial numbers, and hence, the degradation efficiency of the ruminal microbes .
Herein, the untreated WCB and TCB showed significantly lower SCFA, MCP, OMD, DMD, CFD, CPD, and energy content, but higher PF compared with berseem hay. This observed decrease was probably because of low CP and high NDF, and ADL contents of tested crop byproduct . Parissi et al. (2005) reported a positive link between ME or nutrient degradability and CP content. Also, there is a negative relationship between lignin, phenolics, and NDF with digestibility . Similarly, the cell-wall content and assessed indicators like NE, OMD, SCFA, MP, and ME were considered negatively correlated, as reported by Parissi et al. (2005). The high protein lignification (nearly half protein content is associated with ADF) might clarify the low CP degradability . Besides, Fondevila et al. (1994) showed that tomato byproducts have poorly degradable CP. Owing to the poor CP degradability and the great NDF lignification, the most degradable OM was non-structural carbohydrates .
Our findings showed that ENZ addition to TCB and WCB resulted in a significant linear increase in SCFA, ME, NE, MCP, and OMD. Similarly, Gado et al. (2009) and Salem et al. (2013) have also shown that ENZ addition amplified SCFA amounts. Also, these results are comparable to those of Omer et al. (2009), who reported that ENZ supplementation to calves diets enhanced nutrient digestibility and rumen SCFA concentrations. Beauchemin et al. (2003) stated that ENZ supplementation augmented the digestible energy intake of ruminants fed diets rich in fiber content, and energy was the controlling nutrient in the diet. The linear increase of OMD, ME, MCP, and SCFA in TCB and WCB with the ENZ addition may have been because of amplified CFD and modify fermentation in the rumen . Additionally, the enhanced predicted parameters might also be due to increasing rumen microorganisms colonization to the cell wall of the plant , . Also, the synergism between the ENZ and ruminal enzymes could be a potential ENZ mode of action .
The enhanced DMD, CPD, and CFD due to ENZ addition to the incubation media containing TCB and WCB are in line with earlier studies that evaluated the same mixture of enzymes , . This effect can be attributed to ENZ’ ability to degrade the lignocellulose substrate complex into simple compounds that could alter its surface structure or weaken the chemical bond between lignocelluloses, making it easier to access ruminal microbial degradation or to promote ruminal microbial colonization and fermentation efficacy . Also, several modes of action are suggested, like the ability of ENZ to increase colonization of ruminal microbe on the feed particles surface . Also, ENZ capacity to augment colonization and enhance the entrance to the matrix surface via ruminal microbes to hasten digestion rate has also been suggested as a possible mode of action . Moreover, ENZ has been reported to enhance the ruminal microbes hydrolytic potency because of enzyme activities or augmented synergism with enzymes of ruminal microbes . The obtained results suggest that the tested ENZ of Ruminococcus flavefaciens could have the potency to enhance ruminants’ feed utilization efficiency, as evidenced by better gas production, in vitro DM, CP, and CF degradability.
CONCLUSION
This study is an attempt to improve the nutritional quality of two crop wastes (TCB and WCB) as feed for ruminants using a multi-enzyme feed additive resulted from R. flavefaciens. The low nutritional content of both crop residues resulted in dwindling in the in vitro gas production, nutrient degradability, and the energy content (ME and NE). However, WCB and TCB treatment with ENZ, especially at 24 mg/g DM, enhanced gas production and energy content and DM, CP, and CF degradation compared with untreated ones. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to be carried out to apply these results in vivo.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION
SMB, SAS, AAA conceived and designed the experiments. MMA, AAA performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. SMB, SAS, AAA reviewed the manuscript and performed the final check. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
• Adesogan AT, Arriola KG, Jiang Y, Oyebade A, Paula EM, Pech-Cervantes AA, Romero JJ, Ferraretto LF, Vyas D (2019). Symposium review: Technologies for improving fiber utilization. J. Dairy Sci. 102: 5726-5755. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15334[CrossRef]
• Al-Sagheer AA, Daader AH, Gabr HA, Abd El-Moniem EA (2017). Palliative effects of extra virgin olive oil, gallic acid, and lemongrass oil dietary supplementation on growth performance, digestibility, carcass traits, and antioxidant status of heat-stressed growing New Zealand White rabbits. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24: 6807-6818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8396-8[CrossRef]
• Al-Sagheer AA, El-Hack A, Mohamed E, Alagawany M, Naiel MA, Mahgoub SA, Badr MM, Hussein EO, Alowaimer AN, Swelum AA (2019). Paulownia leaves as a new feed resource: Chemical composition and effects on growth, carcasses, digestibility, blood biochemistry, and intestinal bacterial populations of growing rabbits. Animals. 9: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030095[CrossRef]
• Alsaht AA, Bassiony SM, Abdel-Rahman GA, Shehata SA (2014). Effect of cinnamaldehyde thymol mixture on growth performance and some ruminal and blood constituents in growing lambs fed high concentrate diet. Life Sci. J. 11: 240-248.
• Ammar H, Lopez S, Gonzalez J (2005). Assessment of the digestibility of some Mediterranean shrubs by in vitro techniques. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 119: 323-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.12.013[CrossRef]
• AOAC (2006). Official methods of analysis, 18th edn. USA, Washington, DC.
• Ayyat MS, Al-Sagheer AA, Abd El-Latif KM, Khalil BA (2018). Organic Selenium, Probiotics, and Prebiotics Effects on Growth, Blood Biochemistry, and Carcass Traits of Growing Rabbits During Summer and Winter Seasons. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 186: 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1293-2[CrossRef]
• Bakhashwain A, Sallam S, Allam A (2010). Nutritive value assessment of some Saudi Arabian foliages by gas production technique in vitro. JKAU: Met., Env. Arid Land Agric. Sci 142: 1-31. https://doi.org/10.4197/met.21-1.5[CrossRef]
• Beauchemin K, Colombatto D, Morgavi D, Yang W (2003). Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants. J. Anim Sci. 81: E37-E47.
• Beauchemin K, Colombatto D, Morgavi D, Yang W, Rode L (2004). Mode of action of exogenous cell wall degrading enzymes for ruminants. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.4141/A02-102[CrossRef]
• Beauchemin KA, Ribeiro GO, Ran T, Marami Milani MR, Yang W, Khanaki H, Gruninger R, Tsang A, McAllister TA (2019). Recombinant fibrolytic feed enzymes and ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreatment of crop residues to improve fibre degradability in cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 256, 114260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114260[CrossRef]
• Blümmel M, Steingaβ H, Becker K (1997). The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield and 15 N incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. Br. J. Nutr. 77, 911-921. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19970089[CrossRef]
• Conway E (1957). Micro-diffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error, 4th edn. London Crossby, Lockwood and Sons Ltd. In University Press, Glasgow.
• Elmer P, Conn N (1982). Analytical methods for atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT.
• Fondevila M, Guada J, Gasa J, Castrillo C (1994). Tomato pomace as a protein supplement for growing lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 13, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(94)90086-8[CrossRef]
• Gado H, Salem A, Robinson P, Hassan M (2009). Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 154, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.07.006[CrossRef]
• Getachew G, Makkar H, Becker K (2002). Tropical browses: contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoichiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production. J. Agric. Sci. 139, 341-352 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859602002393.[CrossRef]
• Haddi M-L, Filacorda S, Meniai K, Rollin F, Susmel P (2003). In vitro fermentation kinetics of some halophyte shrubs sampled at three stages of maturity. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 104, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00323-1[CrossRef]
• Jalilvand G, Odongo N, López S, Naserian A, Valizadeh R, Shahrodi FE, Kebreab E, France J (2008). Effects of different levels of an enzyme mixture on in vitro gas production parameters of contrasting forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 146, 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.01.007[CrossRef]
• Kamra D, Sawal R, Pathak N, Kewalramani N, Agarwal N (1991). Diurnal variation in ciliate protozoa in the rumen of black buck (Antilope cervicapra) fed green forage. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 13, 165-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.1991.tb00598.x[CrossRef]
• Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT, McSweeney CS (2003). Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27, 663-693 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00072-X.[CrossRef]
• López D, Elghandour M, Salem A, Vázquez-Armijo J, Salazar M, Gado H (2013). Influence of exogenous enzymes on in vitro gas production kinetics and dry matter degradability of a high concentrate diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 13, 527-536.
• Marker TB (1992). Multi-element analysis in plant materials In: ADR IANO DC. Biogeochemistry of trace metals. Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, pp. 401-428, 1992. In Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL.
• Menke K, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agric. Sci. 93, 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086305[CrossRef]
• Menke KH, Steingass H (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 28, 7-55.
• Morgavi D, Beauchemin K, Nsereko V, Rode L, Iwaasa A, Yang W, McAllister T, Wang Y (2000). Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 1310-1321. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74997-6[CrossRef]
• Morgavi D, Beauchemin K, Nsereko V, Rode L, McAllister T, Iwaasa A, Wang Y, Yang W (2001). Resistance of feed enzymes to proteolytic inactivation by rumen microorganisms and gastrointestinal proteases. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 1621-1630. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7961621x[CrossRef]
• Nsereko V, Beauchemin K, Morgavi D, Rode L, Furtado A, McAllister T, Iwaasa A, Yang W, Wang Y (2002). Effect of a fibrolytic enzyme preparation from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on the rumen microbial population of dairy cows. Can. J. Microbiol. 48, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1139/w01-131[CrossRef]
• Omer H, Abdel-Magid SS (2015). Incorporation of dried tomato pomace in growing sheep rations. Glob. Vet 14, 1-16.
• Omer H, El-Rahman H, Salman FM, Abdel-Magid SS, Mohamed M, Awadalla I (2009). Response of growing calves to diets containing different levels of exogenous enzymes mixture. Egypt J. Nutr.& Feeds 12, 385-401.
• Ørskov E, McDonald I (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agri. Sci. 92, 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048[CrossRef]
• Parissi Z, Papachristou T, Nastis A (2005). Effect of drying method on estimated nutritive value of browse species using an in vitro gas production technique. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 123, 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.046[CrossRef]
• Salem A, Gado H, Colombatto D, Elghandour M (2013). Effects of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and growth performance in beef steers. Livest. Sci. 154, 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.02.014[CrossRef]
• Sallam S, Nasser M, El-Waziry A, Bueno I, Abdalla A (2007). Use of an in vitro rumen gas production technique to evaluate some ruminant feedstuffs. J. Appl. Sci. Res 3, 34-41 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752756200021219.[CrossRef]
• Ventura MR, Pieltain M, Castanon J (2009). Evaluation of tomato crop by-products as feed for goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 154, 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.09.004[CrossRef]
• Wang Y, McAllister T, Rode L, Beauchemin K, Morgavi D, Nsereko V, Iwaasa A, Yang W (2001). Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec). Br. J. Nutr. 85, 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2000277[CrossRef]
• Warner A (1964). Production of volatile fatty acids in the rumen: methods of measurement. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 34, 339.
• Yang W, Beauchemin K, Rode L (2000). A comparison of methods of adding fibrolytic enzymes to lactating cow diets. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2512-2520. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75143-5[CrossRef]
Dose-Response Effect of Exogenous Enzymes Treatment of Tomato and Watermelon Crop Byproducts on In vitro Nutrient Degradability and Rumen Fermentation Kinetics · ResearchersLinks