ResearchersLinks

Research Article · Volume 14, Issue 4, 12 September 2026 · Open Access

Chemical Composition of Guinea Grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq.) Cultivars as Forage for Ruminants Under VSU Microclimate

Affiliations & Notes ⌄
  1. 1Central Bicol State University of Agriculture, San Jose, Pili, Camarines Sur, Philippines 4418. *Correspondence | Angelo Francis F. Atole, Central Bicol State University of Agriculture, San Jose, Pili, Camarines Sur, Philippines 4418Email: angelofrancis.atole@cbsua.edu.ph
Article Info ⌄
Journal:
Journal of Animal Health and Production
Published:
12 September 2026

From the article

  • The increased GE levels at 45 days may be associated with greater fiber accumulation in plant tissues.
  • The higher cellulose concentrations in LG, particularly at 45 days, reflect greater structural carbohydrate accumulation at later harvest age.
  • The cultivar type and harvest age significantly influenced the chemical composition of Guinea grass.
  • The more favorable fiber profile of MG, particularly when harvested at 30 days, reflects the influence of harvest age on forage quality.

Selected from the article's own text.

Abstract

This study compared the effects of cultivar and harvest age on the chemical composition of Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq.) grown under the microclimate at Visayas State University, Leyte, Philippines. The two factors were: Factor A: cultivar (Local Guinea grass; LG and Mombasa grass; MG), and Factor B: harvest age (30 and 45 days). The harvested samples were subjected to proximate analysis and fiber fraction assessment using the standard laboratory procedures. The data were analyzed using a 2x2 factorial experiment in a Randomized Complete Block Design with cultivars and harvest age as main effects. Dry matter (p=0.0068) and organic matter (p=<0.0001) were significantly higher for LG than for MG, except for ash (p=<0.0001; higher for MG). These chemical compositions increased with harvest age. Interaction effects were observed between crude protein (p=0.0018) and ether extract (p=0.0044), while gross energy increased significantly with harvest age (p=0.0003). Significant interaction effects were observed for neutral detergent fiber (p=0.0001), acid detergent lignin (p=0.0206; both highest for LG45), and hemicellulose (p=0.0015; highest for MG45). Acid detergent fiber and cellulose were significantly higher for LG (p=0.0001) and increased with harvest age. MG (specifically when harvested at 30 days) had higher crude protein and lower fiber fractions, making it a more favorable forage from a ruminant nutrition perspective than LG. This study highlights the importance of proper cultivar selection and harvest age, thus optimizing the feeding value of Guinea grass as forage for ruminants under the VSU microclimate.
 
Keywords | Chemical analysis, Fiber profile, Guinea grass, Harvest age, Microclimate, Mombasa grass

Introduction

Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq.) is widely cultivated by ruminant farmers due to its adaptability, ease of propagation, and high biomass yield. Of its cultivars, Local Guinea grass (LG) and Mombasa grass (MG; Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Mombasa) are especially common in tropical Southeast Asia, including the Philippines ; ; ; . Numerous studies have shown that harvest age significantly influences the nutrient composition of these grasses, which in turn affects ruminant feed intake ; . Delayed harvest ages consistently increase fiber [(NDF (neutral detergent fiber), ADF (acid detergent fiber), and ADL (acid detergent lignin)] concentrations in plant tissues, reducing rumen degradability. Conversely, harvesting grasses at a younger age can result in higher crude protein (CP), soluble carbohydrate, and mineral contents ; ; ; Ramirez et al., 2022). Therefore, optimizing age at harvest is a crucial management practice for ruminant farmers aiming to maximize forage quality.

Harvesting grasses while young typically enhances their nutritive value in ruminants. However, dry matter (DM), including other more soluble cellular components, may be lower than that of grasses harvested late. In fact, delaying the harvest age increases the herbage yield at the expense of forage acceptability and digestibility in ruminants ; ; . This is exacerbated by the reduced leaf-to-stem ratio as the grass matures due to chemical composition imbalances that can diminish its nutritional integrity. Moreover, genetic differences in growth rate and cell wall development between LG and MG can complicate the situation (Ramirez et al., 2022). Also, cultivar differences between LG and MG may greatly affect the chemical composition of their plant parts . Despite extensive research on the effects of harvest age on forage quality, information on the interaction between cultivar type and harvest age on the chemical composition of Guinea grass cultivars under specific microclimatic conditions is poorly characterized. This limits the development of precise, location-specific harvest recommendations to optimize forage quality and yield of LG and MG. On the other hand, the geography (e.g., soil type, topography) and microclimate (e.g., rainfall, temperature, humidity) at the Visayas State University (VSU) can affect plant growth, nutrient uptake, and fiber deposition. These conditions can influence the DM, OM (organic matter), ash, CP, NDF, ADF, and ADL of plants, making findings from other regions indirectly applicable. Therefore, site-specific findings are essential for developing effective harvest strategies and maximizing forage quality. Among the chemical composition of grasses, DM, OM, ash, CP, NDF, ADF, and ADL are essential indicators of their feeding value for ruminants ; ; . Forages with lower concentrations of detergent fiber fractions and their fiber components, and higher CP content and soluble sugars, promote better rumen microbial activity . This event improves nutrient digestibility and animal performance, aided by nutrient availability in the gut . Therefore, understanding the impacts of Guinea grass cultivar and harvest age on forage production is essential from a ruminant nutrition perspective. Hence, this study compared the chemical composition of LG and MG harvested at 30 and 45 days. This study is pioneering in the Visayas, particularly in Region 8, an archipelagic area characterized by diverse microclimatic conditions resulting from its island geography.

Materials and Methods

Experimental treatments and design

Two factors were considered in this study: Factor A-Guinea grass cultivar (LG, MG), and Factor B-harvest age (30, 45 days). The following treatment combinations were compared: LG30-LG, harvested at 30 days; LG45-LG, harvested at 45 days; MG30-MG, harvested at 30 days; and MG45-MG, harvested at 45 days. A 2x2 factorial experiment in a Randomized Complete Block Design was employed to compare the effects of cultivar and harvest age on the chemical composition of LG and MG. The experimental area was an existing pasture previously utilized for cattle grazing, which has an inherent spatial variability. To control this variability, four blocks were established (four plots/block), each having the randomly assigned treatment combinations. The experimental area was blocked based on the identified factors (e.g., topography, light exposure, and soil characteristics) that may affect plant growth and nutrient composition. The experimental plots (i.e., experimental unit) within each block received the specific treatment combination and were randomly repeated in other blocks.

Environmental conditions of the experimental area

VSU is located in the province of Leyte, which has a Type IV climate, defined by a distribution of year-round rainfall ; . The study area is located at the foot of Mount Pangasugan, surrounded by tree-dominated vegetation and close to the sea, which contributes to its microclimatic conditions. An area with a microclimate is characterized by a small, localized environment with slightly different conditions than the regional climate. During the study, the mean rainfall (12.71 mm) and air temperature (25.02 °C) were recorded using data obtained from the PAGASA AGROMET Station, VSU, Visca, Baybay City, Leyte. The soil characteristics [(pH: 5.89, total OM: 1.84%, total N: 0.16%, avail P: 22.96 mg/kg, exchangeable K: 63.41 mg/kg, particle size: 7.66% clay, 18.66% silt, and 73.66% sand] by composite sampling from the plots were analyzed at the Central Analytical Services Laboratory, VSU, Visca, Baybay City, Leyte.

Land preparation and planting of guinea grass

Several portions of the pasture area at the Department of Animal Science, VSU, Leyte, Philippines, were plowed once and harrowed twice, then divided into four plots (2.5 x 5 m) per block. Four tillers per hill of Guinea grass were planted (0.5 x 0.5 m) and basally fertilized (10 days post-planting) once with complete fertilizer (14-14-14) at a rate of 200 kg/ha. Weeding was carried out as needed, while watering depended on rainfall, reflecting the local practice of marginal ruminant farmers in Leyte, Philippines.

Harvesting and preparation of guinea grass for chemical analysis

Zeroing was performed when Guinea grass cultivars were 60 days old by manually cutting 15 cm above ground with scissors. These served as the baseline information for Factor B: harvest age. The next harvest from their respective plots follows the designated harvest age. Two kilograms of randomly collected and freshly chopped (1 inch long) Guinea grass cultivars from each plot were the composite sample source (50 g). Thereafter, five grams from the composite sample (replicated 3x) were oven-dried (105 °C) for eight hours or until constant weight was achieved. The samples intended for chemical analysis were oven-dried (60 °C) overnight or until constant weight was achieved . The oven-dried samples were immediately ground using a mini-Wiley mill and passed through a 2-mm screen (1425 RPM, Model: 5KH39QN9777, GE Motors, USA; . The ground samples were kept in a sealed plastic container, labeled and stored in a cool, dry place until further analysis.

Chemical analysis of guinea grass

The chemical composition of the Guinea grass cultivars was analyzed at the Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the Department of Animal Science, VSU, Visca, Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines. Samples from each plot in duplicate were analyzed for %DM (105 oC for 8 h), %ash (ashing at 600 °C for 4 h), % OM (100-%ash), %CP (micro Kjeldahl digestion and distillation), %NDF, %ADF, %acid detergent lignin (ADL; , %hemicellulose (%NDF-%ADF), %cellulose (%ADF-%ADL), gross energy (GE; bomb calorimeter, Static Jacket Calorimeter, IKA-Werke GmbH and Co. KG, Germany), and %ether extract (EE; Soxlet fat extraction) following the AOAC (1995) procedures.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using analysis of variance for a 2×2 factorial experiment arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design. Treatment means were compared using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test using the Statistical Analysis System computer program. Main and interaction effects were considered significant at P≤0.05.

Results

Dry matter, organic matter, and ash contents

Table 1 showed no interaction effects between cultivar and harvest age for %DM (p=0.3206), %ash (p=0.2574), and %OM (p=0.2569). However, main effects were observed with LG containing significantly higher DM (p=0.0068) than MG, with values increasing at 45 days of harvest (p<0.0001). In contrast, MG has significantly higher ash content (p<0.0001) than LG, with values increasing at 45 days of harvest (p=0.0078). LG had significantly higher OM content (p=<0.0001) than MG, but OM content decreased at 45 days of harvest (p=0.0077). This indicates a greater proportion of organic nutrients available for animal utilization. In contrast, MG had a significantly higher ash content than LG, with values increasing at 45 days post-harvest.

Table 1: The chemical analysis of LG and MG harvested at 30 and 45 days.

Parameters

LG

MG

SEM

P-values

30-d

45-d

30-d

45-d

A

B

AxB

DM (%)

21.95

23.85

21.35

23.52

0.09

0.0068

<.0001

0.3206

Ash (%)

10.72

11.69

12.56

13.03

0.15

<.0001

0.0078

0.2574

OM (%)

89.28

88.31

87.44

86.97

0.14

<.0001

0.0077

0.2569

CP (%)

4.47b

4.02c

5.18a

4.21b

0.04

<.0001

<.0001

0.0018

EE (%)

2.48a

2.21c

2.40ab

2.34b

0.02

0.5319

0.0003

0.0044

GE (Cal/g)

3616

3801

3582

3736

21.10

0.1308

0.0003

0.6077

NDF (%)

68.05c

72.59a

63.05d

70.14b

0.14

<.0001

<.0001

0.0001

ADF (%)

40.93

43.18

35.84

38.49

0.12

<.0001

<.0001

0.3062

ADL (%)

4.70b

6.27a

4.04c

4.85b

0.09

<.0001

<.0001

0.0206

Hemicellulose (%)

27.13c

29.42b

27.21c

31.65a

0.16

0.0009

<.0001

0.0015

Cellulose (%)

36.23

36.90

31.80

33.64

0.18

<.0001

0.0011

0.0565

*Treatments with similar superscripts in each row are not significantly different.

Crude protein and energy contents

Interaction effects were observed for %CP (p=0.0018) and %EE (p=0.0044). MG30 had the significantly highest CP content among other treatments. MG30 and LG30 have the significantly highest EE content. In contrast, GE was not affected by cultivar type, but was significantly affected by harvest age (p=0.0003), with higher GE values obtained at 45 days compared with 30 days.

Van soest fiber components

Interaction effects were observed for the %NDF (p=0.0001), %ADL (p=0.0206), and %hemicellulose (p=0.0015). For %NDF and %ADL, LG45 had the significantly highest values recorded, while for %hemicellulose, MG45 had the significantly highest value (p=0.0015). In contrast, no interaction effects were observed, but main effects were detected for %ADF and %cellulose. LG had significantly higher ADF (p<0.0001) and %cellulose contents (p<0.0001) than MG, with values increasing at 45 days of harvest (p<0.0001).

Discussion

The cultivar type and harvest age greatly affected the chemical composition of Guinea grass. The increasing DM contents with harvest age (i.e., 45 days) indicate plant maturity and a reduction in grass moisture content. During this event, the Van Soest detergent fiber fractions, particularly the fiber fractions (cellulose and hemicellulose), have increased the structural tissue development of plant parts. Although soil mineral dynamics were not assessed in this study, previous studies have shown that mineral accumulation tends to increase at grass maturity ; , which supports our findings. Additionally, at a later age, higher mineral accumulation is associated with reproductive stages , which may consequently dilute the proportion of organic nutrients, thereby decreasing OM content at 45 days. Therefore, delaying the harvest age provides higher biomass production and mineral accumulation in grasses, providing a better forage supply when feed is scarce.

The concentration of CP was greatly affected by the cultivar, harvest age, and their interaction. The decline in CP concentration at 45-day harvest compared to 30-day harvest in this study reflects the effect of maturity on grass quality. This trend may be associated with a dilution effect as structural components increase; the proportions of nitrogenous and energy-rich constituents in plant parts relatively decrease . In addition, previous studies suggest that at maturation, grass morphology changes, such as a decrease in leaf-to-stem ratio ; , although it was not directly assessed in the present study. This is associated with greater structural carbohydrate accumulation and lignification for stem development, rigidity, and structural integrity (Ramirez et al., 2022), which supports our findings. The cultivar type may also affect the variation in CP contents, as MG has been reported to contain higher levels of protein in the leaves than in stems, which is associated with early harvest stages (i.e., 30 days; ; ; ; ; . In contrast, the extended harvest age (i.e., 45 days) employed in this study resulted in reduced CP content compared to the young stage (i.e., 30 days), which conforms to the previous reports ; ; ; . From a ruminant nutrition perspective, harvesting young grasses will provide higher CP contents than harvesting grasses later.

Similarly, to CP, EE concentration is affected by cultivar type, harvest age, and their interaction. The EE levels from Guinea grass in this study were proximate to values reported by several researchers (1.6-2.34%; ; ; . The decline in EE at 45 days reflects the effect of plant maturity on the cellular components (e.g., . A greater association with grass age and the accumulation of its structural components in plant parts has been reported ; . This suggests an increase in carbon fiber density in the fibrous tissues, particularly in the stems. Consequently, this may reduce the proportion of lipid-containing cellular contents in plant tissues . Contrastingly, previous studies suggest that young grasses have more metabolically active tissues, which may contribute to higher lipid concentrations . Although these physiological events were not measured in this study, the higher EE content observed in younger Guinea grass may provide a greater supply of dietary lipids. Therefore, younger forage may offer nutritional advantages, supporting the energy requirements and milk synthesis in lactating ruminants.

The increased GE levels at 45 days may be associated with greater fiber accumulation in plant tissues. However, higher GE levels at later harvests do not necessarily translate into greater metabolizable energy availability for ruminants. This is associated with an increased cell wall deposition, and lignification reduces forage digestibility. Consequently, the proportion of GE utilized by the animal becomes limited. Furthermore, delaying the harvest period (i.e., 45 days) substantially increased the detergent fiber fractions and their components, as exhibited by higher NDF, ADL, and hemicellulose concentrations. The findings in this study are consistent with previous reports, indicating higher fiber accumulation at later harvests due to greater deposition of structural components required to plant support ; ; . While structural changes were not directly measured in this study, they are widely associated with reduced forage quality at later harvest.

The higher concentrations of detergent fibers (except NDF) and fiber fractions in LG imply higher structural carbohydrate deposition in plant parts. The increased concentrations of ADF and ADL at later harvest highlights the development of more lignified structural tissues in Guinea grass (e.g., LG) harvested at 45 days. Although the leaf-to-stem ratio was not directly evaluated in this study, such variations between cultivars have been reported to influence shifts in fiber composition of plant parts ; . The higher cellulose concentrations in LG, particularly at 45 days, reflect greater structural carbohydrate accumulation at later harvest age. These findings were consistent with the previous report, suggesting that cultivar variation influences cell wall components and lignification (Ramirez et al., 2022). From a ruminant nutrition perspective, higher concentrations of cellulose and lignin are associated with reduced accessibility of structural carbohydrates by rumen microbes ; ; ; . Therefore, farmers may opt to decide the optimum harvest age, considering the drawbacks of harvesting grasses later on their structural carbohydrate accumulation.

Conclusions

The cultivar type and harvest age significantly influenced the chemical composition of Guinea grass. MG has higher concentrations of nutritive cellular components, particularly CP, EE, and hemicellulose, than LG. The more favorable fiber profile of MG, particularly when harvested at 30 days, reflects the influence of harvest age on forage quality. Given the MG’s advantage when harvested earlier, it may provide a better chemical composition than LG. From a ruminant nutrition perspective, the lower fiber levels and higher cellular components of MG30 are associated with improved forage utilization. However, rumen degradability and feeding value were not assessed in this study. Comparing the agronomic and chemical characteristics of Guinea grass cultivars influenced by various management practices, such as fertilization and water management, is recommended. The effects of geographic variation among Philippine islands on the agronomic characteristics and chemical composition of Guinea grass cultivars can be tested. Assessing the silage quality from MG and LG (using inoculants, a wider range of harvest ages) and their rumen degradability at varying harvest ages may provide a more comprehensive understanding of their feeding value in ruminants (at different physiological conditions).

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the research fund provided by the Department of Science and Technology-Accelerated Science and Technology Human Resource Development Program and the Department of Animal Science at VSU for providing access to their resources. Sincere thanks to Dr. Manuel D. Gacutan, Jr. and his team for their invaluable technical assistance and support throughout the conduct of this research. Also, the author acknowledges Madam Maria Rhodora Rodriguez for improving the article’s readability.

Novelty Statement

This study is among the first to evaluate the interactive effects of Guinea grass cultivar and harvest age on the chemical composition of forage under the distinct microclimatic conditions of VSU, Leyte, Philippines. Unlike previous studies that focused primarily on either cultivar or cutting interval, this study provides site-specific evidence demonstrating that MG harvested at 30 days offers superior nutritional quality, thereby generating practical recommendations for optimizing forage management and ruminant feeding in similar tropical environments.

Author’s Contribution

The author conducted, analyzed, and drafted this research.

Generative AI and AI assisted technology statement

The authors declare that no generative AI and AI assisted technology was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest in the conduct of the study.

References

  1. Aclan MA, Sumaria MGC (2025). Irregularity and time-series trend analysis of rainfall in Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines. Ann. Trop. Res., 47(1): 90-102. https://doi.org/10.32945/atr4717.2025[CrossRef]
  2. AOAC (1995). Official methods of analysis, 16th ed. AOAC, Washington, D.C.
  3. Atole AF, Compendio JDZ, Posas OB, Cuadra LJ, Gacutan MDJ (2025). Agronomic characteristics of guinea grass cultivars at different cutting intervals as forage grass for ruminants in Leyte, Philippines. Afr. J. Biol. Sci., 7(8): 511-527.
  4. Atole AFF, Bestil LC (2014). Extrapolating bypass protein potential of treated soybean meal by degradation in rumen-fistulated brahman cattle. Ann. Trop. Res., 36(1): 50-62. https://doi.org/10.32945/atr3614.2014[CrossRef]
  5. Atole AFF, Bestil LC (2019). Extrapolating the bypass potential of treated madre de agua (Trichanthera gigantea Nees) leaf meal as protein source in rumen-fistulated brahman cattle. Ann. Trop. Res., 41(1): 24-31. https://doi.org/10.32945/atr4113.2019[CrossRef]
  6. Babayemi O (2009). Silage quality, dry matter intake and digestibility by West African dwarf sheep of guinea grass (Panicum maximum cv Ntchisi) harvested at 4 and 12 weeks. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8(16). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/62100
  7. Bacorro TJ, Reyes PMB, Loresco MM, Angeles AA (2018). Herbage dry matter yield, nutrient composition, and in vitro gas production of mulato II and mombasa grasses at 30-and 45-day cutting intervals. Philipp. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 44(1): 86-89.
  8. Barbosa RA, Nascimento Júnior Dd, Vilela HH, Sousa BMdL, Silva SCd, Euclides VPB, Silveira MCTd (2012). Morphogenetic and structural characteristics of guinea grass tillers at different ages under intermittent stocking. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 41: 1583-1588. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000700005[CrossRef]
  9. Basconcillo J, Lucero A, Solis A, Sandoval, Jr R, Bautista E, Koizumi T, Kanamaru H (2016). Statistically downscaled projected changes in seasonal mean temperature and rainfall in Cagayan Valley, Philippines. 2. 94(0): 151-164. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-058[CrossRef]
  10. Bestil LC, Atole AFF, Rama JM (2014). Chemical composition and in situ digestibility of common feed resources for ruminants in marginal uplands. Ann. Trop. Res., 36(Supplement): 179-190. https://doi.org/10.32945/atr36s12.2014[CrossRef]
  11. Carvajal-Tapia JI, Barahona-Rosales R, Castro-Montoya J, Arango J, Vivas Quila NJ (2023). Nutritional and biomass evaluation of a Megathyrsus maximus collection in a dry tropical climate in Colombia. Trop. Grassl.-Forrajes Trop., 11(1): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(11)11-21[CrossRef]
  12. Chen X, Yan F, Liu T, Zhang Y, Li X, Wang M, Zhang C, Xu X, Deng L, Yao J, Wu S (2022). Ruminal microbiota determines the high-fiber utilization of ruminants: Evidence from the ruminal microbiota transplant. Microbiol. Spectr., 10(4): e00446-00422. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00446-22[CrossRef]
  13. Darch T, McGrath SP, Lee MR, Beaumont DA, Blackwell MS, Horrocks CA, Evans J, Storkey J (2020). The mineral composition of wild-type and cultivated varieties of pasture species. Agron., 10(10): 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101463[CrossRef]
  14. González Marcillo RL, Castro Guaman WE, Guerrro Pincay AE, Vera Zambrano PA, Ortiz Naveda NR, Guaman Rivera SA (2021). Assessment of guinea grass Panicum maximum under silvopastoral systems in combination with two management systems in Orellana province, Ecuador. Agric., 11(2): 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020117[CrossRef]
  15. Guadayo G, Rayos A, Merca F, Tandang A, Loresco M, Angeles A (2019). Prediction of in situ ruminal degradability of forages in buffaloes using the in vitro gas production technique. Trop. Anim. Sci. J., 42(2): 128-136. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2019.42.2.128[CrossRef]
  16. Hare MD (2020). Herbage yield and quality of megathyrsus cultivars in Northeast Thailand. Trop. Grassl.-Forrajes Trop., 8(3): 187-194. https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(8)187-194[CrossRef]
  17. Hare MD, Phengphet S, Songsiri T, Sutin N (2014). Botanical and agronomic growth of two Panicum maximum cultivars, mombasa and tanzania, at varying sowing rates. Trop. Grassl. Forrajes Trop., 2(3): 246-253. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(2)246-253[CrossRef]
  18. Hare MD, Phengphet S, Songsiri T, Sutin N, Stern E (2013). Effect of cutting interval on yield and quality of two Panicum maximum cultivars in Thailand. Trop. Grassl. Forrajes Trop., 1: 87-89. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(1)87-89[CrossRef]
  19. Heuzé V, Tran G (2020). Panicum guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus). Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO.
  20. Junges L, Gomes ENO, Candido AR, Ítavo LCV, Ítavo CCBF, Coelho EM, Difante GDS, Santos GTD, Dias AM (2024). Longer cutting intervals on the characteristics of guinea grass: Morphogenetic, productive, and nutritional traits. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci., 46: e60358. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v46i1.60358[CrossRef]
  21. Jusoh S, Alimon A, Kamiri M (2014). Agronomic properties, dry matter production and nutritive quality of guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus) harvested at different cutting intervals. Malays. J. Anim. Sci., 17(2): 31-36.
  22. Kondo M, Yoshida M, Loresco M, Lapitan RM, Herrera JRV, Barrio AND, Uyeno Y, Matsui H, Fujihara T (2015). Nutrient contents and in vitro ruminal fermentation of tropical grasses harvested in wet season in the Philippines. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 3(12): 694-699. https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/3.12.694.699[Full text][CrossRef]
  23. Machado E, Matumoto Pintro PT, Ítavo LCV, Agustinho BC, Daniel JLP, Santos NW, Bragatto JM, Ribeiro MG, Zeoula LM (2020). Reduction in lignin content and increase in the antioxidant capacity of corn and sugarcane silages treated with an enzymatic complex produced by white rot fungus. PLoS One, 15(2): e0229141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229141[CrossRef]
  24. Maillard A, Diquélou S, Billard V, Laîné P, Garnica M, Prudent M, Garcia-Mina JM, Yvin, JC, Ourry A (2015). Leaf mineral nutrient remobilization during leaf senescence and modulation by nutrient deficiency. Front. Plant Sci., 6: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00317.[CrossRef]
  25. Marques BDS, Costa KADP, do Nascimento, HLB, Bilego UO, Hara E, Tavares RLM, Cabral JSR, da Silva LM, Bento JC, de Morais BF, Costa AC (2024). Efficiency of desiccation, biomass production, and nutrient accumulation in zuri and quênia guinea grasses in integrated crop–livestock systems and second-crop maize. Plants., 13(22): 3250. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13223250[CrossRef]
  26. Morillo D, Farìa-Mármol J, Gonzalez R (1997). Effect of the cutting frequency on yield and crude protein and mineral contents of Panicum maximum. IGC Proceedings., (1985-2023): 29. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/1997/session22/29
  27. Obregón-Cruz AB, Gómez CA, Osorio CM, Van Saun RJ (2024). Intake and digestibility of four rations with different fiber levels in alpacas (Vicugna pacos). Trop. Anim Health Prod., 56(8): 311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04177-7[CrossRef]
  28. Ogunwole O, Akinfemi A, Akinsoyinu A (2011). Degradation of crude protein in groundnut cake, guinea grass (Panicum maximum) and rumen epithelial scraping based diets by West African dwarf sheep. Niger. J. Anim. Prod., 38(1): 106-115. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v38i1.702[CrossRef]
  29. Peng Z, Liang X, Sai Y (2024). Effect of harvesting time on biomass and combustion quality of Miscanthus lutarioriparius in Dongting lake area. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Na., 52(2): 13575-13575. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha52213575[CrossRef]
  30. Quang DV, Ba NX, Doyle PT, Hai DV, Lane PA, Malau-Aduli AE, Van NH, Parsons D (2015). Effect of concentrate supplementation on nutrient digestibility and growth of brahman crossbred cattle fed a basal diet of grass and rice straw. J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 57: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-015-0068-y[CrossRef]
  31. Ramírez, Sergio, Rueda JA, Magaly C, Ángel M, Bautista J. (2022). Yield and quality of Guinea grass cv. Mombasa according to plant spacing and season of the year. 195-203. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v15i9.2286[CrossRef]
  32. Thongruang S, Manatrinon S, Swangkit T, Kochasopon S (2020). Yields, forage characteristics, and nutritive values of purple guinea grass and mombasa guinea grass at different cutting ages. J. Mahanakorn Vet. Med., 15(2): 199-207.
  33. Van Niekerk W, Hassen A, Bechaz F (2010). Influence of growth stage at harvest on fermentative characteristics of Panicum maximum silage. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 40(4): 334-341. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v40i4.65251[CrossRef]
  34. Van Soest P, Robertson J (1979). Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds standardization of analytical methodology for feeds: Proceedings of a workshop. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  35. Van Soest P (1988). Effect of environment and quality of fibre on the nutritive value of crop residues. Plant Breeding and Nutritive Value of Crop Residues, pp. 71-96.
  36. Villalba JJ, Ates S, Mac Adam JW (2021). Non-fiber carbohydrates in forages and their influence on beef production systems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 5: 566338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.566338[CrossRef]
  37. Wolele MA, Zeleke FM, Chekol YM, Limenih BA, Zegeye ZB (2025). Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus) agronomic performances in mixed cultivation using irrigation condition, North-Western Ethiopia. PLoS One, 20(2): e0316565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316565[CrossRef]

Services

Article usage statistics

Loading…

Chemical Composition of Guinea Grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq.) Cultivars as Forage for Ruminants Under VSU Microclimate · ResearchersLinks