Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Journal of Animal Health and Production

REAL_JAHP_MH20151012191033_ Yousaf et al

 

 

Short Communication

 

The Prevalence of Brucellosis in Kundhi Buffaloes in District Hyderabad, Pakistan

 

Adnan Yousaf1*, Riaz Ahmed Laghari2, Muhammad Shoaib3, Abrar Ahmad4, Kanwar Kumar Malhi2, Gulfam Ali Mughal5, Shakeel Lakho3, Imam Bakhsh Khetran6

1Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan; 2Department of Veterinary Medicine; 3Department of Veterinary Microbiology; 4Department of Veterinary Pharmacology; 5Department of Livestock Management; 6Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan.

 

Abstract | Bovine brucellosis causes heavy losses in dairy animals. The current study was conducted to observe the prevalence of brucellosis in district Hyderabad, Pakistan. A total of Four hundred and Two (n=402) milk samples were collected from 30 towns during winter and summer seasons of 2014-2015 from Kundhi buffaloes. In winter, milk specimens (n=124) were collected from 12 towns and in summer (n=278) from 18 towns arbitrarily. All samples were investigated for Brucella abortus (B. abortus) antibodies using by milk ring test (MRT). An overall 1.99 percent (8/402) positive prevalence of B. abortus antibodies was detected in milk of Kundhi buffalo. From 124 milk samples collected throughout winter only 3 (2.41%) were found positive while, among 278 milk samples taken throughout summer, 5 (1.79%) were declared as positive. It was concluded that prevalence of brucellosis in Kundhi buffaloes was low in Hyderabad, Pakistan.

 

Keywords | Brucellosis, Kundhi Buffalo, Winter, Summer, Milk Ring Test, Hyderabad

 

Editor | Asghar Ali Kamboh, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan.

Received | October 12, 2015; Revised | November 06, 2015; Accepted | November 20, 2015; Published | December 13, 2015

*Correspondence | Adnan Yousaf, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan; Email: dr.adnan011@gmail.com

Citation | Yousaf A, Laghari RA, Shoaib M, Ahmad A, Malhi KK, Mughal GA, Lakho S, Khetran IB (2016). The prevalence of brucellosis in Kundhi buffaloes in District Hyderabad, Pakistan. J. Anim. Health Prod. 4(1): 6-8.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2016/4.1.6.8

ISSN | 2308–2801

Copyright © 2016 Yousaf et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

It has been estimated that more than 95% world population of buffaloes are found in Asia mainly in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal, Thailand and Sri Lanka (Othman et al., 2014). Buffalo is considered as the foremost milk producing animals of Pakistan which is known as “black gold’. They also have a significant role in draught and meat production. In Pakistan, three breeds of buffalo viz., Nili Ravi, Kundhi and Azi-Kheli are found. Kundhi buffaloes is found throughout the Sindh province mainly on both sides of the Indus River, with average milk production of 1700-2200 liters per lactation (Kumar et al., 2013; Mirza et al., 2015).

 

The Buffalo is facing several health issues, including colibacillosis and brucellosis (Mailk et al., 2013). Brucellosis is also called Bang disease, which is a zoonotic disease throughout the world (Durrani et al, 2015), that is a common transmittable bacterial disease of livestock and have great economic importance worldwide including Pakistan (Munir et al., 2010). Brucellosis is caused by an aerobic gram- negative bacteria of the genus Brucella. Among the genus, Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis are the principal cause of brucellosis in farm animals (Karaca et al., 2007). Brucella organism is also declared as a primary agent of brucellosis in human beings, which is transmitted to humans from infected/carrier animals including cattle, goat, sheep and dogs through ingestion of contaminated animal products and/or by inhalation of air borne pathogen (Buhari et al, 2015). Subclinical infections in animals often results in reduced milk production and clinical cases had abortion (Cutler et al., 2005).

 

In Hyderabad, Kundhi buffalo is a major milch animal, and kept as in large-scale and small-scale farms. Hyderabad region is also a border city, where from animals cross from other cities (i.e., Karachi, Jamshoro, Tando Muhammad Khan etc.) without proper quarantine measures, thus, several transmissible diseases including Anthrax, Tuberculosis and brucellosis are present in this region (Soomro et al., 2014). Therefore, in present study, it was planned to observe the prevalence of brucellosis in Kundhi buffaloes of district Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.

 

In this study, milk samples (n= 402) were collected from Kundhi buffalos in district Hyderabad to analyze the Brucella abortus (B. abortus) antibodies during winter and summer seasons of year 2014-2015. These samples were collected from milking animals regardless of animal age, of both large and small scale farming systems. In winter, milk samples (n=124) from 12 towns and in summer (n=278) from 18 towns were collected randomly. During sample collection, hygienic conditions were ensured by applying an appropriate antiseptic solution on clean teats. The first few strips of milk were discarded and then a 5 mL milk sample was collected in sterilized glass bottles. These samples were cooled immediately in ice and transported to laboratory in ice jar, where they were stored at -20˚C for as described by Soomro et al. (2014).

 

All the samples were analyzed using Milk ring test (MRT) according to standard technique (OIE, 2008). Hematoxylin stained antigen of B. abortus (Strain-99) was obtained from Central Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory Tandojam (CVDL Tandoajm, Pakistan) and used for MRT as recommended by manufacturer (Veterinary Research Institute, Lahore, Pakistan). In brief, 0.03 µL of B. abortus antigen was added to 1000 µL of milk, shaked well and incubated at 98.6 °F for 60 minutes and then tested for ring formation.

 

All results were computed using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets and were presented in percentages (by dividing the number of +ve samples with total number of samples x 100).

 

MRT is recognized as a key screening test for brucellosis in milk (Soomro et al., 2014). A total 124 milk samples were collected throughout winter, 3 (2.41%) were found positive for B. abortus antibodies, whereas 121 (97.59%) were declared as negative by MRT. Likewise, 278 milk samples collected throughout summer, 5 (1.79%) were regarded as positive while remaining 273 (98.20%) were found negative for B. abortus antibodies. An overall 1.99 percent (8/402) positive prevalence of B. abortus antibodies in milk of Kundhi buffalo was found (Table 1).

 

Table 1: Prevalence of Brucella abortus in Kundhi Buffaloes in Distract Hyderabad

Season

No. of towns

No. of milk samples

Positive No. (%)

Negative No. (%)

Winter

12

124

3 (2.41%)

121 (97.59%)

Summer

18

278

5 (1.79%)

273 (98.20%)

Total

30

402

8 (1.99%)

394 (98%)

 

According to OIE, brucellosis is a second most global zoonotic disease that chiefly found in the South Asia, India and Pakistan (Add reference). It affects the buffalo, cattle, sheep, goat and swine. In cattle, disease is mainly caused by B. abortus. The disease is important from commercial point of view because it is a major barrier for trade and one of the utmost overwhelming transboundary animal disease (OIE, 2008). In our present study, a very little prevalence (1.99%) of B. abortus was observed as compared to other studies. Like, a previous study conducted in Hyderabad indicated the 47.19% prevalence of B. abortus in buffaloes (Soomro et al., 2014), however the number of samples analyzed in the previous study were very little (n=89) as compared to our study. Similarly, another survey done in Karachi indicated the 14.00% prevalence of B. abortus antibodies in the milk of bovine population (Durrani et al., 2015). These results of high prevalence (14 to 47.19%) recorded previously might be due to the breed differences as our study was only on Kundhi buffaloes, however other researchers have study on mixed breed of buffaloes and cattle. Because, inter-breed differences for susceptibility to B. abortus in bovines have been reported recently (Mangi et al., 2015). The study reported significant differences between five different cattle breeds for susceptibility levels to B. abortus using the different techniques including Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT) and Competitive Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (c-ELISA). The study declared the difference of Brucella antibodies from 8.8% to 36.67% in different cattle breeds. However, our present study results are in agreement with a recent report that declared the prevalence of B. abortus antibodies in bovine population of Iran as 1.18% analyzed through MRT (Maadi et al., 2011).

 

In present study, we have find a very little difference in prevalence of B. abortus in buffaloes during different seasons. This result is in consistent with a recent study that also reported a non-significant (P< 0.05) effects of season on B. abortus antibodies in bovines (Maadi et al., 2011). However, another study dealing with elk indicated that milder winters could reduce the sero-prevalence of brucellosis in the elk populations (Cross et al., 2007). These dissimilarities in sero-prevalence of bovine brucellosis might be due to geographical differences, technique applied, sample used and/or variation in the animal species used in these studies (Sachan et al., 2013).

 

From present results, it could was concluded that prevalence of brucellosis in Kundhi buffaloes in Hyderabad region of Pakistan is very low; however, there is still a threat present to human population and other livestock species. Therefore, further studies should be carried out for the effective strategies for rational control and prevention of brucellosis in buffalo breeds and other farm animals.

 

Conflict of interest

 

There is no conflict of interest in the article.

 

Authors’ Contribution

 

Mr Adnan Yousaf was main author of the research work carried out. Dr Riaz Ahmed Laghari was supervisor, Muhammad Shoaib helped in correspondence, Abrar Ahmad, Kanwar Kumar Malhi assisted in results analysis, Dr. Gulfam Ali Mughal was advisor in treatment line, Shakeel Lakhho and Imam Bakhsh Khetran were fellow in the research work and proposal making.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

The authors are grateful to the staff of Central Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Tandojam, Pakistan for providing research opportunity and financial support.

 

REFERENCES

 

  • Buhari HU, Saidu SNA, Mohammed G, Raji MA (2015). Knowledge, attitude and practices of pastoralists on bovine brucellosis in the north senatorial district of Kaduna state, Nigeria. J. Anim. Health Prod. 3(2): 28 - 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2015/3.2.28.34
  • Cross PC, Edwards WH, Scurlock BM, Maichak EJ, Rogerson JD (2007). Effects of management and climate on elk brucellosis in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Ecol. Appl: 17: 957-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-1603
  • Cutler SJ, Whatmor AM, Commander NJ (2005). A review: Brucellosis - new aspects of an old disease. J. Appl. Microbiol: 98: 1270 - 1281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02622.x
  • Durrani N, Rind R, Kamboh AA, Habib F, Samo SP, khan SA, Zia U, Shahid M (2015). Prevalence survey of bovine brucellosis in apparently healthy dairy animals in Karachi, Pakistan. J. Anim. Health Prod. 3(2): 35 - 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2015/3.2.35.38
  • Karaca, M, Babϋr C, Çelebi B, Altan AH, Tϋtϋncϋ M, Keleş I, Atalay BU, Kili CS (2007). Investigation on the sero-prevalence of toxoplasmosis, listeriosis and brucellosis in goats living in the region of Van, Turkey. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 18: 45 - 49.
  • Kumar PR, Shukla SN, Purkayastha RD (2013). Economical analysis of the estimated cost of management of anestrus buffaloes under field conditions using different hormonal and non–hormonal strategies. J. Anim. Health. Prod: 1(4): 39 - 41.
  • Maadi H, Moharamnejad M, Haghi M (2011). Prevalence of brucellosis in cattle in Urmia, Iran. Pak. Vet. J. 31(1): 81 - 82.
  • Mailk S, Kumar A, Verma AK, Gupta MK, Sharma SD, Sharma AK, Rahal A (2013). Incidence and drug resistance pattern of collibacillosis in cattle and buffalo calves in Western Utter Pradesh in India. J. Anim. Health. Prod. 1(2): 15-19.
  • Mangi MH, Kamboh AA, Rind R, Dewani P, Nizamani ZA, Mangi AR, Nizamani AR, Vistro WA (2015). Seroprevalence of brucellosis in Holstein-Friesian and indigenous cattle breeds of Sindh Province, Pakistan. J. Anim. Health Prod. 3(4): 82 - 87. http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2015/3.4.82.87
  • Mirza RH, Javed K, Akhtar M, Rauf M, Dilshad SMR, Khan MA, Tipu MA (2015). Genetic and phenotypic correlation of some body measurements with milk yield in Nili Ravi buffaloes of Pakistan. J. Anim. Health Prod. 3(1): 1 - 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2015/3.1.1.5
  • Morgan WJB, Davidson I, Herbert CN (1978). The use of second international standard for anti-Brucella abortus serum in the complement fixation test. J. Biol. Standardization. 1: 43 - 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-1157(73)90030-9
  • Munir R, Afzal M, Hussain M, Naqvi SMS, Khanum A (2010). Outer membrane proteins of B. abortus vaccinal and field strains and their immune response in buffaloes. Pak. Vet. J: 30: 110 - 114.
  • OIE (2008). Bovine brucellosis. In: Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animal. Paris, France. 6th Edition. Pp. 409-438.
  • Othman R, Bakar MZA, Kasim A, Zamri–Saad M (2014). Improving the reproductive performance of buffaloes in Sabah, Malaysia. J. Anim. Health Prod. 2(1): 1 - 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2014/2.1.1.4
  • Sachan N, Nautiyal B, Agarwal RK, Singh VP, Verma AK (2013). Sero-epidemiological pattern of Salmonellosis in animals of Rohilkhand Region, Uttar Pradesh, India. J. Anim. Health Prod. 1(1): 6 - 9.
  • Shareef JM (2006). A review of serological investigations of brucellosis among farm animals and humans in Northern provinces of Iraq (1974-2004). J. Vet. Med. 53: 38 - 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.01021.x
  • Soomro AH, Kamboh AA, Rind R, Dawani P, Sarwar M, Abro SH, Awais M (2014). A study on prevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in cattle and buffaloes in district Hyderabad, Pakistan. J. Anim. Health Prod. 2 (3): 33 - 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2014/2.3.33.37
  • Taleski V, Zerva L, Kantardjiev T, Cvetnic Z, Erski- Biljic M, Nikolovski B, Bosnjakovski J, Katalinic- Jankovic V, Panteliadou A, Stojkoski S, Kirandziski T (2002). An overview of the epidemiology and epizootiology of brucellosis in selected countries of Central and Southeast Euro. Vet. Microbiol. 90: 147 - 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00250-X
  •  

     

     

     

    Journal of Animal Health and Production

    November

    Vol. 12, Sp. Iss. 1

    Featuring

    Click here for more

    Subscribe Today

    Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


    Subscribe Unsubscribe