Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Journal of Animal Health and Production

JAHP_9_s1_42-48

 

 

Research Article

 

Ascorbic Acid Attenuated the Hepatic Parenchymal Necrosis induced by Azithromycin- Etoricoxib Interaction in Rats

 

Fatma Omara2, Sayed A. Aziz1, Sawsan M. El-Sheikh1, Mahmoud A. A. Said2*

1Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt; 2Zagazig University Hospital, Zagazig University, Egypt.

 

Abstract | Adverse drug reactions are still facing difficulties until these days. Azithromycin is commonly prescribed for serious infectious diseases of farm animals caused by gram positive cocci and gram negative bacilli. Some data reported that azithromycin has a potential interaction with etoricoxib. The objective of this study was to investigate the possible hepatoprotective effect of ascorbic acid against hepatotoxicity due to azithromycin- etoricoxib interaction using biochemical and histopathological approaches. One hundred and eight adult male albino rats were divided into six equal groups Viz., control, ascorbic acid, azithromycin, etoricoxib, azithromycin+etoricoxib and azithromycin+etoricoxib+ascorbic acid. The results showed a significant (p < 0.05) decline in aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) level of rats given ascorbic acid alone and in combination with etoricoxib and azithromycin corresponding to control and etoricoxib/azithromycin groups respectively. The ascorbic acid significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level in rats given combination of etoricoxib and azithromycin. A significant increase (p<0.05) in serum glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and decrease (p<0.05) in malondialdehyde (MDA) was observed in ascorbic acid+etoricoxib+azithromycin group as compared with etoricoxib+azithromycin group. Moreover, ascorbic acid restored the liver histomorphological architecture deteriorated by azithromycin+etoricoxib to its normal state. It was concluded that ascorbic acid could prevent hepatocellular damage caused by azithromycin and etoricoxib.

 

Keywords | Liver, Ascorbic acid, Azithromycin, Etoricoxib, Histopathology

 

Received | July 21, 2021; Accepted | August 08, 2021; Published | August 25, 2021

*Correspondence | Mahmoud AA Said, Zagazig University Hospital, Zagazig University, Egypt; Email: bataomara@gmail.com

Citation | Omara F, Aziz SA, El-Sheikh SM, Said MAA (2021). Ascorbic acid attenuated the hepatic parenchymal necrosis induced by azithromycin- etoricoxib interaction in rats. J. Anim. Health Prod. 9(s1): 42-48.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2021/9.s1.42.48

ISSN | 2308-2801

Copyright © 2021 Omara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Globally, Drug- induced liver disease is considered one of most adverse drug events having high mortality rate and their prevention and treatment guidelines still remain inadequate in spite of advancement of pharmacovigilance field (Ramappa et al., 2013). The main cornerstone for pathogenesis of this type of disease is oxidative stress and inflammation which makes it progress to more serious complications e.g. steatosis, chronic hepatitis, fibrosis, and even cirrhosis. Azithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, is extensively used for gram positive cocci and gram negative bacilli infections. Despite its effectiveness and clinically improvement outcome, many hepatic disorders have been reported because of the use of this drug (Sultana et al., 2020).

 

Some controversial data reported that etoricoxib (a selective cox II inhibitor) increases chances of developing hepatic injury induced by azithromycin via inhibiting its metabolism. Nevertheless, some anti-oxidant drugs like sylimarin and N-acetyl cysteine have been assessed for their hepatoprotective effect against different experimentally induced liver toxicities and have shown to be therapeutically useful agents (Camini et al., 2020). Additionally, many diverse plant extracts were extensively established for its role against oxidative stress- induced hepatotoxicity through various mechanisms (Mossa et al., 2015).

 

Ascorbic acid is a water soluble vitamin and it’s one of the dominant antioxidants, sustaining the intracellular antioxidant system. It has many different therapeutic uses like immunostimulant and promoting wound healing. And yet, its role in preventing hepatic fibrosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis due to its free radicle scavenging effect has been recognized (Naziroglu et al., 2011).

 

This study was carried out to detect the possible drug interaction between azithromycin and etoricoxib, to assess the hepatocellular damage induced by this interaction and to attempt to counteract this damage by ascorbic acid by performing serum biochemical analysis and histopathological techniques.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 

Drugs

Azithromycin powder for oral suspension (100 mg/5ml), etoricoxib and ascorbic acid (500 mg each) were purchased from EGYPHAR, Obour City-Egypt.

 

Animals and experimental design

One hundred and eight adult male albino rats weighing from 150-180 g were used. They were obtained from Animal Breeding Unit, Faculty of Vet. Med. Zagazig University. The rats were left to acclimatize in wire cage with natural ventilation and were given standard pelleted diet and clean tap water ad libitum 2 weeks prior to the experiment. The rats were allocated into 6 equal groups, each of 18 and were treated according to experimental design shown in Table 1. This study was done according to ethical guidelines of Zagazig University committee (Nr. ZU-IACUC/2/F/69/2020).

 

Sample collection

At the end of the experiment, six rats from each group were sacrificed on days 1, 7, and 14 post treatments. Blood samples were collected to clot and serum was separated by centrifugation at 503 xg for measuring biochemical liver function parameters and liver tissues were collected in a jar containing 10% neutral formation for histopathological examination.

 

Histopathological study

According to procedures of Suvarnet et al. (2013) liver was cut into slices and preserved in jar containing 10% neutral formalin. They were processed in an automated tissue processor. Paraffin sections (4–5 um) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Stained sections were examined for inflammatory reactions, degenerative, necrotic, apoptotic changes and any other pathological lesions in experimental rats (Mohammed et al., 2019).

 

Biochemical analysis of liver enzymes

Serum Liver enzymes including AST and ALT were analyzed with IDEXX Catalyst One Chemistry Analyzer (IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, USA) while gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the liver homogenate was analyzed by following specific ELISA kit procedures using manufacturer’s instructions (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Houston, TX, USA) (Akinnuga, 2019).

 

Oxidant/Antioxidant Assessment

The determination of the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was based on the generation of superoxide radicals produced by xanthine and xanthine oxidase, which react with 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenol)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride to form a red formazon dye. Briefly, 300 μL of mixed substrate was added to 200 μL of diluted hemolysates (Madkour, 2013). The samples were mixed well and 75 μL xanthine oxidase was added to reactions. The absorbance was measured at 505 nm and the SOD activity was then calculated according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Ransod®-Randox Lab, Antrim, UK) and expressed as U/mL.

 

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity was determined based on the fact that GPx catalyses the oxidation of glutathione by cumene hydroperoxide. In presence of the glutathione reductase and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), the oxidized glutathione was immediately converted to the reduced form with concomitant oxidation of NADPH to NADP+. To evaluate GPx activity in hemolysates 10 μL of samples was mixed with 500 μL reagent R1 and 20 μL cumene R2. The absorbance was measured at 340 nm and the GPx activity was then calculated according to the manufacturers instruction (Ransel®-Randox Lab, Antrim, UK). The enzymes activities were expressed as U/mL (Fatemeh et al., 2016).

 

The procedure to estimate the reduced glutathione (GSH) level followed the method described by Ellman, (1959). In this method thiols react with Ellman’s reagent (5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) or DTNB), cleaving the disulfide bond to give 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoate (TNB), which ionizes to the TNB2− dianion in water at neutral and alkaline pH. To evaluate GSH level in samples, 15 μL of hemolysates was mixed with 260 μL assay buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate and 1 mM EDTA, pH: 8) and 5 μL Ellman reagents. Samples were incubated for 15 min at room temperature and the TNB2− formation was quantified in a spectrophotometer by measuring the absorbance of visible light at 412 nm. Absorbance values were compared with a standard curve generated from standard curve from known GSH.

 

Catalase (CAT) activity was determined spectrophotometrically by the method of (Koroliuk et al., 1988). Briefly, 10 μL of sample was incubated with 100 μmol/mL of H2O2 in 0.05 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer pH = 7 for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by rapidly adding 50 μL of 4% ammonium molybdate. Yellow complex of ammonium molybdate and H2O2 was measured at 410 nm. One unit of catalase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to decompose 1 μmol H2O2 per min.

 

Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in samples were measured using the thiobarbituric acid reaction method of Placer et al. (1966). Quantification of the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances was determined at 532 nm by comparing the absorption to the standard curve of MDA equivalents generated by acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane. To measure MDA level, a working solution containing 15% trichloroacetic acid, 0.375% thiobarbituric acid, and 0.25 N hydrochloric acid was prepared. For each sample, 250 μL serum and 500 μL working solution were mixed and placed in boiling water for 10 min. After cooling the samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. Finally 200 μL of each supernatant was transferred to microplates and the optical density of samples was measured at 535 nm. The values of MDA were expressed as μmol/L.

 

Statistical analysis

The obtained data were analyzed and graphically represented using the statistical package for social science (SPSS, version 16), for obtaining [Mean value ± standard error]. The results were statistically analyzed by using one-way ANOVA test. Subsequent multiple comparisons between the different groups were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple comparison tests. Values at p < 0.05 were considered significant (Armitage et al., 2008).

 

RESULTS

 

Liver function parameters

The data shown in Table (2) illustrated significant (p < 0.05) decline in AST and ALT of rats given ascorbic acid alone and in combination with etoricoxib and azithromycin corresponding to control and etoricoxib/azithromycin respectively along the entire period of the study. Ascorbic acid also reduced (p > 0.05) the serum AST and ALT level of rats when given along with etoricoxib+azithromycin combination.

 

Changes in ALP and GGT parameters were represented in Table 3. The ascorbic acid significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the GGT level in rats given combination of etoricoxib and azithromycin on 1st and 7th day post administration as compared to rats of group etoricoxib+azithromycin. The ALP level was reduced (p < 0.05) in rats given etoricoxib and azithromycin combination on 7th and 14th day post administration as compared to etoricoxib+azithromycin group.

 

Antioxidant parameters

The data provided on Table 4 clarified a significant increase (p<0.05) in serum GPx of ascorbic acid+etoricoxib+azithromycin group as compared with etoricoxib+azithromycin group on 1st and 7th day post administration. The obtained results revealed that treatment with all drugs and their combination in their recommended doses showed no significant (p > 0.05) changes in serum CAT. Table (5) revealed that treatment of ascorbic acid in etoricoxib+azithromycin rats exhibited a significant (p < 0.05) increase in GSH on day-7 post oral administration, but no difference (p > 0.05) detected on days 1 and 14 post-treatment. Serum SOD levels of rats given ascorbic acid together with azithromycin and etoricoxib has decreased in a significant manner (p < 0.05) on days 1, 7 and 14 post treatment in contrast to azithromycin+etoricoxib group.

 

The treatment of ascorbic acid to etoricoxib+azithromycin rats resulted a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in serum MDA value on days 1 and 7 post-treatments (Table 6).

 

Histopathological findings

Hepatic parenchyma and hepatocytes were apparently normal (Fig.1A). The dose of etoricoxib induced hydropic degenerative and edematous portal vein with periductular fibrosis containing lymphocyte, which were the main detectable lesions in the hepatic parenchyma on the 14th day post administration (Fig.1B). Degenerative changes, mainly acute cell swelling or coagulative necrosis occurred in the hepatic cells. Moreover, congested blood vessels with proliferation of bile ductules and fibroblasts were seen in portal areas and in interlobular tissue as shown in Fig.1C. On day 7 post administration of etoricoxib and azithromycin combination, an extensive degenerative or necrotic changes of the hepatic cells, congested portal vein, while numerous bile ductules and fibroblasts proliferation were evident (Fig 1D). On the 14th day post administration, these necrotic changes in the hepatic parenchyma were replaced by extravasted erythrocyte with acute cell swelling in the adjacent cells were the main encountered lesions (Fig. 1E). Addition of ascorbic acid with the two drugs caused mild reversible changes varied from cloudy swelling beside dilated portal vein and a few lymphocytes in some portal areas were noticed (Fig. 1F). Fourteen days after the treatment, the majority of the hepatic parenchyma restored its normal morphological character except few cells have a cloudy swelling or vacuolar degeneration beside hyperplastic kupffer cells (Fig. 1G). There were no detectable changes in the portal areas.

 

Table 1: Experimental animals grouping and treatment strategy.

 

Experimental groups* Dose**
I. Control group Rats were orally given 1 ml distilled water.
II. Treated with vitamin C (Ascorbic acid) Rats were injected with vitamin C 40mg/kg BW intraperitoneally for14 consecutive days.
III. Treated with etoricoxib, azithromycin and vitamin C Rats were given etoricoxib 1 mg/kg BW and azithromycin 45mg/kg BW orally using stomach tube, and vitamin C 40mg/kg BW intraperitoneally for 14 consecutive days.
IV. Treated with etoricoxib and azithromycin Rats were orally given etoricoxib 1 mg/kg BW and azithromycin 45mg/kg BW for 14 consecutive days.
V. Treated with azithromycin Rats were orally given azithromycin 45mg/kg BW for 14 consecutive days.
VI. Treated with etoricoxib Rats were orally given etoricoxib 1 mg/kg BW for 14 consecutive days.


* n= 18 in each group.

** Doses of vitamin C, etoricoxib and azithromycin were adopted from the studies of Ebuehi et al., (2012), Moraes et al., (2007), and El-Sayed, (2017) respectively.

 

Table 2: Effect of administration of azithromycin, etoricoxib and ascorbic acid on ALT and AST of male albino rats. (Mean± S.E)

 

Parameters ALT(U/L) AST (U/L)
Groups

1st day

7th day

14th day

1st day

7th day

14th day

Control

262.33 10.19ab

259.54 10.6ab

264.33 10.61bc

50.3 3.38ab

48.66 3.23d

49.073.15bc

Ascorbic acid

222 9.53cd

281.33 3.89ab

281.33 4.6 b

49.66 4.17ab

39.33 3.41de

45.33 5.19bc

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib+ ascorbic acid

273.66 12.81ab

279.33 11.79ab

251 4.01cd

44.66 3.9b

73.33 4.43ab

55.33 6.41b

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib

286.66 12.46a

304.33 10.68a

271 10.61bc

52.33 1.42ab

77.66 6.08a

66.66 5.33ab

Azithromycin

226.33 10.94cd

146.33 10.06d

245.5 5.05cd

56 .28a

65.66 3.89bc

56.41 1.81b

Etoricoxib

185 4.5e

200.33 12.6bc

320.66 2.2a

49 1.32b

63 3.53bc

78.33 .83a


Mean with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different at (p ≤ 0.05).

 

Table 3: Effect of administration of azithromycin, etoricoxib and ascorbic acid on GGT and ALP of male albino rats. (Mean± S.E)

 

Parameters GGT (U/L) ALP(U/L)
Groups

1st day

7th day

14th day

1st day

7th day

14th day

Control

1.13 0.058c

1.14 0.052d

1.13 0.05d

315.83 10.94a

303 10.68a

307 10.26e

Ascorbic acid

1.35 0.1d

1.33 0.22d

1.03 0.25c

169 3.96b

221 4.44c

374.33 15.83d

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib+ ascorbic acid

4.91 0.63c

6 0.86c

3.33 0.44b

177 9.004b

198.66 10.58 c

586 21.09 b

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib

10 1.31a

29 3.87a

3.66 0.44b

180.33 5.18b

245.66 10.88b

737 16.74a

Azithromycin

7.10 0.36b

14 1.42b

8.1 0.83a

197.66 10.93b

191 10.21c

448.5 5.34 c

Etoricoxib

1.55 0.36d

26 1.24a

4.33 0.6b

177.66 5.73b

252 11.85b

590.66 15.83 b


Mean with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different at (p ≤ 0.05).

 

Table 4: Effect of administration of azithromycin, etoricoxib and ascorbic acid on GPx and CAT of male albino rats. (Mean± S.E)

 

Parameters GPx (U/ ml) CAT (U/L)
Groups

1st day

7th day

14th day

1st day

7th day

14th day

Control

24.85 .12 a

24.2 .103 a

25.06 .2a

5.47 .25 c

5.48 0.28 ab

5.26 0.25c

Ascorbic acid

24.2 .17 b

23.46 .12 b

24.26 .21b

6.21 .47bc

4.93 0.34 b

6.05 0.4b

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib+ ascorbic acid

22.2 .05 c

22.8 .25 c

22.66 .14c

8.33 .43 a

6.13 0.38 ab

9.59 0.72a

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib

21.60 .05 e

22.18 .102 d

22.4 .15 c

8.39 .59 a

7.69 0.45 a

9.51 1.1a

Azithromycin

21.80 .05de

22.16 .09 d

22.06 .08 c

6.9 .28 b

7.71 0.41 a

7.26 0.58bc

Etoricoxib

22.06 .12cd

22.4 .057 d

22.4 .15 c

7.23 .24 ab

8.06 0.33 a

7.02 0.58 c


Mean with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different at (p ≤ 0.05).

 

Table 5: Effect of administration of azithromycin, etoricoxib and ascorbic acid on GSH and SOD of male albino rats. (Mean± S.E)

 

Parameters GSH (µmol/ mL) SOD (U/L)
Groups

1st day

7th day

14th day

1st day

7th day

14th day

Control

68.32 2.93a

77.95 2.02a

79.99 .64a

44.33 0.72 b

44.62 1.04 ab

45.2 1.58a

Ascorbic acid

74.06 .98a

77.77 2.39a

79.25 2.25a

49.33 1.3 a

48.66 2.02 a

49 1.15a

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib+ ascorbic acid

55.55 1.92 b

62.73 1.33b

55.55 2.13c

32.33 1.01d

32 1.04 d

33.66 1.58c

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib

49.81 1.82 b

40.73 1.61 c

58.51 3.74 c

41 0.57 c

39.66 1.45 bc

38.33 1.2b

Azithromycin

42.22 .64 c

31.1 1.28 d

70.36 2.03ab

32 1.32 d

31.33 1.01 d

30 1.06c

etoricoxib

40.73 .74 c

62.95 2.96 b

65.91 1.95b

29.33 0.88 d

31.33 1.16 d

24.66 0.79 d


Mean with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different at (p ≤ 0.05).

 

Table 6: Effect of administration of azithromycin, etoricoxib and ascorbic acid on MDA value of male albino rats. (Mean± S.E)

 

Parameter

 

MDA(mmol/L)after
Groups

1st day

7th day

14th day

 

49.89 2.86 c

50.12 2.8d

49.75 1.91d

Control

48.23 2.16 c

47.25 2.87d

41.59 1.87e

Ascorbic acid

71.58 3.75 b

71.59 1.87 c

84.6 1.87b

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib+ ascorbic acid

97.62 1.87 a

108.46 4.72a

73.75 3.9bc

Azithromycin+ etoricoxib

99.79 2.87 a

95.45 5.59 ab

112.8 5.73a

Azithromycin

106.29 7.11a

71.59 1.87 c

82.43 2.16b

Etoricoxib

 

 

 


Mean with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different at (p ≤ 0.05).

 






 

DISCUSSION

 

In this study, we used rats and divided them as mentioned before. Biochemical analysis including oxidative parameters and liver function tests and histopathological study were performed to evaluate the severity of liver damage induced by etoricoxib-azithromycin interaction and how to avoid this adverse drug reaction by using ascorbic acid.

 

Further, the combination of etoricoxib and azithromycin caused a significant increase in ALT and AST along the entire course of study as well as major necrotic changes in the hepatic parenchyma on days 7 and 14 post treatment. No previous studies have been reported on the hepatotoxicity caused due to the interaction between azithromycin and etoricoxib. But the same dose of azithromycin alone caused a coagulative necrosis associated with congested blood vessels. These data agreed with Sayed et al. (2020) who stated that the dose of 5 mg/ kg. body weight given orally for 5 successive days caused centrolobular necrosis with a presence of congested central vein. Also, Olayinka and Ore, (2014) supported our findings, because they concluded that the hepatotoxic effects of azithromycin appeared due to the generation of highly reactive free radicals because of oxidative threat caused by the drug which disrupted normal cellular functioning of the liver.

 

As is known, increased serum GGT is one of the major adverse effects caused by azithromycin. For that reason, it caused a significant rising of serum GGT values of rats given azithriomycin and its combination with etoricoxib. This result was in accordance with Singh et al. (2015) who concluded that azithromycin 200 mg/kg and paracetamol 250 mg/kg given to Wister rats for 7 successive days caused liver toxicity characterized by increased GGT and other liver enzymes and increased oxidative parameters. Notably, increased levels of AST, ALT and ALP indicate cellular leakage and hepatocyte dysfunction, so this leakage makes these enzymes escape into the circulation. In addition, elevated serum GGT levels are indicative of increased biliary pressure caused by azithromycin (Duan et al., 2016).

 

Many research studies have widely revealed that Vitamin C (Ascorbic acid) has anti-oxidant properties (Hoang et al., 2020). Our results are nearly similar to (Riffel et al., 2020) who reported that that administration of vitamins C prevented changes in pro-oxidant and antioxidant markers in rats exposed to chronic constriction injury. After adding ascorbic acid to the two drugs, it resulted in normalizing serum liver enzymes and returned hepatic histomorphological architecture to its normal state. It was explained by Oularbi et al. (2017) who confirmed that Vit. C attenuated oxidant markers, liver biochemical and histological abnormalities in rats whose liver was exposed to Emamectin. On the other hand, these provided data strengthened the hypothesis that ascorbic acid is potent anti-oxidant works by 1) Inhibiting cytochrome C that’s involved in activation of caspase enzymes 2) Decrease DNA damage 3) Enhancement of cytochrome oxidase, which is important for mitochondrial O2 entry (Agnieszka et al., 2019).

 

CONCLUSION

 

It was concluded that the interaction (combination) of azithromycin and etoricoxib have serious hepato-damaging effects. Ascorbic acid clearly abolished liver damage and histomorphological abnormalities induced by both azithromycin and etoricoxib. This would be of interest in the upcoming days in the clinical practice to establish a concept role in management and avoidance of potential hepatotoxicity induced by azithromycin- etoricoxib interaction.

 

acknowledgements

 

The authors would like to thank all members of Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University for their assistance.

 

conflict of interest

 

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 

AUTHORS CONTRibution

 

All authors contributed equally.

 

REFERENCES

 

  • Agnieszka G˛Egotek, Iwona Jarocka-Karpowicz, El ˙Zbieta Skrzydlewska (2019). Synergistic Cytoprotective Effects of Rutin and Ascorbic Acid on the Proteomic Profile of 3D-Cultured Keratinocytes Exposed to UVA or UVB Radiation. Nutrients. 11: 2672. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112672
  • Akinnuga AM, Siboto A, Khumalo B, Sibiya NH, Ngubane PS, Khathi, A (2019). Evaluation of the effects of bredemolic acid on selected markers of glucose homeostasis in diet-induced prediabetic rats. Archiv. Physiol. Biochem. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2978340
  • Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JN (2008). Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Fourth Edition. 760-783.
  • Camini, Fernanda Caetano,Costa, Daniela Caldeira (2020). «Silymarin: not just another antioxidant». J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. (31): 4. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0206
  • Duan L, Davis JS, Woolbright BL, Du K, Cahkraborty M, Weemhoff J, Jaeschke H, Bourdi M, Chakraborty M (2016). Differential Susceptibility to Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Injury in Sub-Strains of C57BL/6 Mice: 6N versus 6J. Food Chem. Toxicol98:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.10.021
  • Ebuehi OA, Ogedegbe RA, Ebuehi OM (2012). Oral administration of vitamin C and vitamin E ameliorates lead-induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in the rat brain. Nig. Q J. Hosp. Med. (2):85-90. PMID: 23175903.
  • Ellman GL (1959). Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82:70–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6
  • El-Sayed MG, Kandiel MM, Ebied DA (2017). Changes in reproductive organs, semen characteristics and intra-testicular oxidative stress in adult male rats caused by azithromycin. Int. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2017; 5: 72-79. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijpt.v5i2.7778
  • Fatemeh S, Razavi, S, Adeleh R, Mehdi H, Nematollah R, Rahnama A (2016). Glutathione Peroxidase Activity Assay with Colorimetric Method and Microplate Reading Format and Comparison with Chemiluminescence Method. 5: 15-21
  • Hoang BX, Shaw G, Fang W, Han B (2020). Possible application of high-dose vitamin C in the prevention and therapy of coronavirus infection. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 23:256-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.09.025
  • Koroliuk MA, Ivanova LI, Maĭorova IG, Tokarev VE (1988). Metod opredeleniia aktivnosti katalazy [A method of determining catalase activity]. Lab Delo. (1):16-9.
  • Madkour FF, Abdel-Daim MM (2013). Hepatoprotective and Antioxidant Activity of Dunaliella salina in Paracetamol-induced Acute Toxicity in Rats. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 75(6):642-648.
  • Mohammed RS, Donia GR, Tahoun EAE, Darwish AA (2019). Immunological and histopathological alterations in rats experimentally infected with trypanosoma evansi. J. Anim. Health Prod. 7(2): 43-50.
  • Moraes B, Amaral B, Morimoto M, Vieira L, Perazzo F, Carvalho J (2007). Anti-inflammatory and analgesic actions of etoricoxib (an NSAID) combined with misoprostol. Inflammopharmacology. 15: 175-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-006-1581-x
  • Mossa AH, Swelam ES, Mohafrash SMM (2015). Sub-chronic exposure to fipronil induced oxidative stress, biochemical and histotopathological changes in the liver and kidney of male albino rats.  Toxicol. Rep. 19; 2:775-784 doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.02.009
  • Naziroglu M, Butterworth PJ, Sonmez TT (2011). Dietary vitamin C and E modulates antioxidant levels in blood, brain, liver, muscle, and testes in diabetic aged rats. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 81:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000083
  • Olayinka ET, Ore A (2014). Influence of azithromycin treatment on hepatic lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defence systems of rats. Brit. J. Pharmaceut. Res. 2014: 4(2):240-256. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJPR/2014/3853
  • Oularbi KH, Richeval C, Lebaili N, Zerrouki-Daoudi N, Baha M, Djennas N, Allorge D (2017). Ameliorative effect of vitamin C against hepatotoxicity induced by emamectin benzoate in rats. Human Experimen. Toxicol. 36(7): 709-717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327116661022
  • Placer ZA, Cushman LL, Johnson BC (1966). “Estimation of product of lipid peroxidation (malonyl dialdehyde) in biochemical systems,” Analyt. Biochem. 16(2): 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(66)90167-9
  • Ramappa V, Aithal GP (2013). Hepatotoxicity related to anti-tuberculosis drugs: mechanisms and management. J. Clin. Experimen. Hepatol. 3(1):37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2012.12.001
  • Riffel AP, Santos MC, De Souza JA, Scheid T, Horst A, Kolberg C, Belló-Klein A, Partata WA (2018). Treatment with ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol modulates oxidative-stress markers in the spinal cord of rats with neuropathic pain Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 51: 4. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431x20177097
  • Sayed M, Farag, Enas, Kandil, Mona, Sayed (2020). Hepatorenal protective effect of curcumin in normal and infected rats with staphylococuss aureus treated with azithromycin. World J. Pharmac. Pharmaceut. Sci. 8(4).
  • Singh H, Prakash A, Kalia AN, Majeed AB (2015). Synergistic hepatoprotective potential of ethanolic extract of Solanum xanthocarpum and Juniperus communis against paracetamol and azithromycin induced liver injury in rats. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 6(4):370-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2015.07.005
  • Sultana J, Cutroneo PM, Crisafulli S, Puglisi G, Caramori G, Trifirò G (2020). Azithromycin in COVID-19 Patients: Pharmacological Mechanism, Clinical Evidence and Prescribing Guidelines. Drug Saf. 43(8):691-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00976-7
  • Suvarnet S, Christopher L, Bancroft John D (2013). Bancroft’s Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 7th Edition.
  •  

     

     

     

    Journal of Animal Health and Production

    November

    Vol. 12, Sp. Iss. 1

    Featuring

    Click here for more

    Subscribe Today

    Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


    Subscribe Unsubscribe