Join Us  |   Site Map
Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Toxicity, Antifeedant and Sub-Lethal Effects of Citrullus colocynthis Extracts on Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)




Toxicity, Antifeedant and Sub-Lethal Effects of Citrullus colocynthis Extracts on Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Asim Gulzar1,*, Ather Maqsood1, Munir Ahmed1, Muhammad Tariq1, Muhammad Ali2 and Rahmatullah Qureshi3

1Department of Entomology, Pir Meher Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

2Institute of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

3Department of Botany, Pir Meher Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan


Cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) is very important polyphagous insect pest with wide host range known for its economic losses worldwide. Its ability to develop resistance to insecticides faster to identify alternates like biocontrol agents, plant extracts etc. In the present study the extract of Citrullus colocynthis in different solvents were evaluated on second instar larvae of H. armigera under laboratory studies for toxicity, sublethal and antifeedant effect. The result showed that ethanol based extract was the most effective to control the H. armigera followed by the ethyl acetate. The sublethal concentration of ethanol based extract of C. colocynthis increased larval and pupal duration as compared with control. The percent pupation, adult emergence and pupal weight decreased in treated populations as compared with control populations. The results of this study can be used in integrated pest management program for the management of H. armigera.

Article Information

Received 22 November 2016

Revised 14 March 2017

Accepted 21 July 2017

Available online 20 October 2017

Authors’ Contribution

AG, M Ahmed and RQ conceived the idea. AM and MT conducted the experiment. AG and M Ali analyze the data. AG and MT wrote the paper.

Key words

Citrullus colocynthis, Helicoverpa armigera, IPM, Cotton bollworm, Insecticide resistance.


* Corresponding author:

0030-9923/2017/0006-2019 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2017 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), commonly known as bollworm, earworm, fruitworm or pod borer is very important insect pest of many important crops in Asia, Africa, Australia and Europe (Fakrudin et al., 2004; Teese et al., 2013; Hemati et al., 2013; Ali et al., 2016). It damages approximately 181 plant species including cotton, chickpea, okra and tomato (Manjunath et al., 1989; Razmjou et al., 2014). The larvae feed mainly on reproductive plant parts resulting severe crop losses and protects themselves because of their cryptic feeding habits (Kamaraj et al., 2008; Razmjou et al., 2014). During the 1990s, it appeared as a major insect pest of important crops in Pakistan (Ahmad et al., 2001) and needed application of more effective methods for its management.

Farmers mostly rely on chemicals as insecticides for the control of insect and mite pests but their frequent use has resulted in development of resistance in number of key pest species (Palumbi, 2008; Matthew, 2008; Xu et al., 2010). Insecticide resistance is now a major problem for the chemical control of a wide range of insect pests (Bisset et al., 1997; Liu and Yue, 2000). Approximately 500 agricultural pest insect species have developed resistance to various pesticides (Whalon et al., 2008). The field populations of H. armigera (F.) have developed insecticide resistance to all the insecticides (McCaffery, 1998; Avilla and Gonzales-Zamora, 2010; Namin et al., 2014; Abedi et al., 2014). In Pakistan, this developed insecticide resistance to almost all the conventional insecticide such as organochlorine (OCs, pyrethroids, organophosphates (OPs) and carbamates (Ahmad et al., 1995, 1997, 1998a, b, 1999, 2001).

Environmental and toxicological hazards of insecticides widespread use have spurred the search for alternatives (Munoza et al., 2013). Conventional and synthetic compounds of plants for development of more integrated methods of insect pest management have possibilities for future use (Tabashnik, 1994). Plant extracts have certain chemicals which can effectively substitute synthetic pesticides without phytotoxic properties (Schmutterer, 1990; Georges et al., 2008; Munoza et al., 2013). These plant based pesticides have been used in agriculture since two millennia for their efficient pest management and safety to mankind (Bernays, 1983; Thacker, 2002). Citrullus colocynthis, an annual herb, is found in warm regions of Pakistan, India, and Africa (Tallamy et al., 1997; Hussain et al., 2014). This plant shows insecticidal, antifeedant, larvicidal and antioviposition effects against insect pests. Petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, benzene and methanol extracts of C. colocynthis seeds showed negative impact on adult emergence of spider mites and pulse beetle (Mansoor et al., 2004; Seenivasan et al., 2004) and Culex quinquefasiatus (Mullai and Jebanesan, 2007; Rahuman et al., 2008). The aqueous extract of different parts of C. colocynthis significantly reduced the Rhopalosiphum padi population (Khalid, 2015).

Sub-lethal effects may be defined as behavioural and physiological changes occur in individuals that survive to the exposure to a pesticide at sub-lethal dose/concentration (Desneux et al., 2007; Hui et al., 2010). Various studies on sub-lethal effects of various insecticides have been conducted to determine the harmful and non-lethal impacts of insecticides on life span, fecundity, fertility and olfactory learning of insects (Shi et al., 2011; Biondi et al., 2012; Gontijo et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2013). In this paper the toxicity and antifeedant activity of different extract of C. colocynthis were studied. Moreover, the sub-lethal effects of ethanolic extract on different biological parameter of H. armigera were also studied.


Materials and methods

Insect collection and rearing

A population of H. armigera was collected from the cotton growing areas and cultured at 25 ± 2 C, 60 ± 5% RH with 16:8 (light:dark) cycle. The larvae were provided with artificial diet until pupation. The pupae were placed in a box lined with tissue paper. The adults were transferred to rearing jars and fed with 10% sugar solution. Nappy liner strips were hanged for egg laying. The eggs were collected on daily basis. After hatching, neonates were shifted to the artificial diet and 2nd instar larvae were used for bioassays and biological studies.

Collection of plant material and extract preparation

Citrullus colocynthis fruits were collected from Bhakkar and all the impurities were removed completely by hand picking. C. colocynthis plant was dried at room temperature. Dried fruits were pulverized in fine powder with electric grinder and sieved through a muslin cloth. For solvent extract, 50 grams of the powdered fruit was soaked in 100 ml of commercial ethanol, methanol, ethyl acetate and hexane separately for 24 h. The mixtures were stirred for one hour and then kept under 4°C in a refrigerator for 48 h. This was stirred again for one hour. The solution was passed through Whatman filter paper No. 4 twice. The solvent was dissolved in 10 ml of respective solvent to be used as stock solution.

Toxicity bioassays

Bioassay experiments were performed by using diet immersion method. Fresh artificial diet was prepared with different serial concentrations with different solvent extracts of C. colocynthis. The prepared artificial diet was cut into small pieces and place in Petri dish. The diet prepared with respective solvent alone was used as control. One larva per Petri dish was released on the treated diet. Four replications were made against each concentration and 10 larvae per replication were used. An organophosphate insecticide, (profenofos) was used as standard to compare the results of plant extracts. Mortality data was noted after 7 days. Larvae that failed to respond to gentle contact with a fine brush were considered as dead.

Sub-lethal effects on biological parameters

Sublethal effect of ethanolic extract of C. colocynthis against H. armigera larvae were evaluated using a sublethal concentration of LC25 calculated from the toxicity experiment.

Development and survival of larval stages of H. armigera to adults

Twenty 2nd instar larvae were placed on artificial diet incorporated with the LC25 concentration of ethanol extract of C. colocynthis in individual Petri dishes and same with ethanol alone as control. Each treatment was replicated five times. Larvae were examined daily and the development time from 2nd instar larva to pupa was noted. The weight of the pupa was noted one day after pupation. The pupae were kept individually in 250 ml plastic cups covered with white netting. Adult emergence was noted daily.

Adult longevity, mating success, fecundity and egg viability of H. armigera

On emergence, adults (< 24 h-old) were paired to estimate the longevity, fecundity and egg viability. The adults were paired as follows: Control (untreated) male x Control (untreated) female (10 pairs) and insecticide treated male x insecticide treated female (10 pairs). Each pair was kept in transparent cup coved with white netting. Honey solution was provided as a food source. When a female started egg laying, the pair was shifted to a new cup daily until they died. Mating success, number of eggs laid per female, proportion of eggs that hatched and adult longevity were recorded.

Antifeedant activity

Diet having LC50 value of extracts of C. colocynthis was weighed in the shape of a small cube and placed in Petri dishes for larval consumption. The diet prepared without extract was used as control. The 2nd instar larvae were starved for almost 8 h before the experiment. Starved larvae were released on treated and control diet in Petri dishes. Data was noted after 24 h. The percent diet consumed was calculated by using feeding deterrence index (DI) (Koul et al., 2003).

Deterrence index

CAA = (C-T / C+T) × 100

Where, CAA is corrected antifeedant activity; T is diet consumed in treatment and C is diet consumed in control.

Statistical analysis

LC50 and LC25 values were determined with Polo-PC software (LeOra Software, 1987). Data for developmental time (larval and pupal duration) was subjected to one–way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the significant differences between treatments were determined by using Tukey’s HSD test (P < 0.05) with Satistix 8.1 (2005).



Toxicity bioassay

The LC25, LC50 and LC90 values of different extract of C. colocynthis to H. armigera after 7 days were summarized in Table I. The result showed that the ethanol based extract was more toxic as compared with the other extract of C. colosynthis. The water based extract showed least toxicity. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the toxicity of all the treatments (Table I) but there was significant difference (P< 0.05) between all the extract and the positive control.

Development and survival of Helicoverpa armigera

The larval developmental time (2nd instar to pupation) of H. armigera treated with sub- lethal concentration of ethanol fruit extract of C. colocynthis was significantly longer compare with untreated control larvae (Table II, F =8.17, df =5, p <0.046). The mean pupal developmental time of treated larvae were significantly longer compare with untreated larvae (Table II, F= 70.8, DF= 5, P< 0.001). The mean developmental time from 2nd instar to adult of treated larvae was also significantly longer than control (Table II, F= 60.72, dF= 5, P< 0.001). The mean pupal weight of treated H. armigera was significantly lower than control treatment (Table II, F= 161.04, df =5, P < 0.0001). The percent pupation was not significantly different (Table II, F= 0.34, df= 5, P> 0.736) in the treated insects as comparison with the control treatment. The percent adults emergence was significantly lower in treated population (Table II, F= 15.76, df= 5, P < 0.016) as compare with the control. The mean adult longevity of treated population was significantly longer than control population (Table II, F=20.16, df= 5, P < 0.01).


Table I.- Toxicity of Citrullus colocynthis fruit extracts in different solvents to 2nd instar larvae of Helicoverpa armigera observed after seven days of exposure.


LC25 (95% CI) %

LC50 (95% CI) %

LC90 (95% CI) %

Slope ± SE


2.63 (0.92-4.16)a

7.57 (6.17-10.28)a

32.18 (19.28-98.19)a


Ethyl acetate

1.26 (0.35-2.09)a

3.55 (2.21- 4.66)b




0.79 (0.09-1.58)a

2.54 (1.04-3.61)b









3.53 (2.41-4.42)a

9.92 (7.54-12.76)c




0.02 (0.006-0.044)b






Table II.- Mean developmental time (day’s ± SE) and Pupal weight of H. armigera treated with sub lethal concentration of ethanol fruit extract compared with control.


Larval develop ment

Pupal develo pment

Development time (2nd instar to adult)

Adult longevity



% pupae

Adult Emerg ence


16.7± 0.48a

7.76± 0.44a

24.46± 0.04a

10.6 ± 0.61a

213.36± 2.12a

84.4% ± 1.34a

77% ± 0.04a


18.08± 1.04b

10.11± 0.10b

28.2± 0.94b

12.26± 0.53b

199.43± 0.04b

79% ± 0.027b

68% ± 0.014b

Values within columns with a common letter are not significantly different (P>0.05).


Table III.- Larval weight (mg ± SE) of Helicoverpa armigera treated with sub-lethal (LC25) concentration of ethanol fruit extract compared with control.



















Values within columns with a common letter are not significantly different (P>0.05).


The mean larval weight of 2nd. 3rd, 4th and 5th instars was not significantly different as compare with the control in comparison with the control (Table III, F = 32.7, df = 5, P> 0.05). But There was significant difference in larval weight of 6th instar when compared with the control population (Table III, F= 29.8, df= 5, P < 0.001).


Matting success, fecundity and egg viability of Helicoverpa armigera

There was no significant difference between treated and control treatments for the proportion of pairs that produced eggs (Table IV, df= 5, P > 0.05). The number of eggs laid by the treated H. armigera was not significantly different as compare with the control (Table IV, df= 5, P> 0.05). Similarly, the egg viability of treated population was not significantly different compared with the control (Table IV, df= 5, P> 0.05)


Antifeedant activity

Decrease in feeding was observed with significant variation of different extracts of 74.5% with ethyl acetate, 72 % with ethanol, 52.5 % with methanol, 36.5% with hexane and 24% with water based (Table V).


Table IV.- Mean reproductive parameter of Helicoverpa armigera treated with sub-lethal (LC25) concentration of ethanol fruit extract compared with control.



MPSb %

Egg/female ± SE

% viability of eggs ±SE

Control 15 80

360± 16a


Treated 15 65

376± 13a


a, total number of pairs; b, mating pair success; Values within columns with a common letter are not significantly different (P>0.05).


Table V.- Deterrence index of different solvent extracts of C. colocynthis against 2nd instar of Helicoverpa armigera in diet incorporate method at LC50 value.


Deterrence index







Ethyl acetate







The frequent and indiscriminate use of synthetic insecticides causes environmental and insect pest resistance problems (Tabashnik and Roush, 1990). Another source of natural insecticides used by man for centuries is chemicals derived from the plants which are safe for environment, less toxic to natural enemies and do not persist in nature for long time (Liu et al., 2000). In the present study organic and water solvent extracts of C. colosynthis fruit were tested against 2nd insatar larvae of H. armigera. The results showed that ethanol extract was more toxic to 2nd instar larvae of H. armigera followed by ethyl acetate extract when used with diet immersion method.) The petroleum ether, methanol and ethyl acetate leaf extracts of C. colocynthis showed toxicity against C. quinquefasciatus larvae (Mullai and Jebanesan, 2007). Seed extract of C. colosynthis in ethanol has antifeedant and toxic properties against mites (Mansour et al., 2004). Water extract of C. colocynthis showed toxic effect against Rhopalosiphum padi (Khalid, 2015). Petroleum and methanol extracts have already been identified as toxic to many mosquito species with larvicidal and anti-oviposition activities (Rahuman et al., 2008). This mortality in mosquitoes was due to the presence of oleic acid and linolic acid (Abdul and Venkatesan, 2008). Fruits extract in four different solvents i.e., n-hexane, methylene chloride, Chloroform and ethanol against have also revealed them effective against Aphis craccivora with the highest mortality recorded in ethanol extracts. This mortality in A. craccivora was due to the presence of E-Glycosides (Torkey et al., 2009). Extract of C. colocynthis, Azadirachta indica, Ammi majus and Mentha microphylla have toxin effect on S. litura and also decreased the total lipid, total fat and total glucose contents of the larvae. These extracts also showed high level of disturbance in the cell wall and midgut of the insect. Presence of organic chemicals including oleic acid, linolic acid, Cucurbiticin B compound and E-Glycoside compounds may be responsible for toxicity and antifeedant effects against tested H. armigera larvae.

The ethanol extract of C. colosynthis showed significant effect on larval development, pupal duration, total development time, percent pupation and pupal weight. However, there existed non-significant effect on the adult longevity, larval weights, fecundity and egg viability. Many scientists have documented similar differences in development after exposure of sublethal concentrations of plant extracts (Wondafrash et al., 2012; Khani et al., 2013; D’Inaco et al., 2014). Ma et al. (2000) studied the effect of neem extract on 2nd instar H. armigera and reported that the neem extract have significant effect on insect development. Arti and Purohit (2009) reported abnormalities in 4th instar larvae of H. armigera when treated with Lantana camara. The water extract of different parts of neem delayed the larval development as compare with control treatment in H. armigera (Wondafrash et al., 2012). The methanolic extract of S. alba showed 54% pupicidal activity at 2% concentration against H. armigera (Sivaraman et al., 2014). The extracts of S. alba and C. viscosa caused 33.93% and 32.86% deformities at adult stage of H. armigera respectively (Sivaraman et al., 2014). These effects of plant extract on insect development could be due to the effects on neurosecretory cells and on endocrine system that control development in insects (Mordue et al., 2005).

In the present study C. colocynthis fruits extract in five different solvents i.e., hexane, methanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate and water were used for investigating the antifeedant activity and the results showed that the ethyl acetate extract reduced the feeding activity 74.5 % in comparison with the control population, ethanol extract was the 2nd effective antifeedant extract with 72% reduction in feeding of the test insect, and water was least effective with 24% decrease in food consumption. Dong et al. (2005) reported that Lantana leaves showed antifeedant activity even at very low concentration when used against two lepidopterous pests, Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera litura. Ramya et al. (2008) investigated that Cathranthus roseus leaf extracts of petroleum ether, methanol and ethyl acetate have antifeedant and larvicidal activity against H. armigera. The methanolic extract of S. alba showed 71.42% antifeedant activity at 2% concentration against H. armigera (Sivaraman et al., 2014)

In Pakistan, farmers mostly apply insecticide to control this pest. This situation leads the development of insecticide resistance in H. arnmigera. This study showed that extracts of C. colosynthis possess insecticidal and developmental inhibiting effect on H. armigera. The use of C. colosynthis along with the insecticide in the IPM programs delays the development of resistance in this pest. Moreover, the application of C. colosynthis also minimizes adverse effect on the human due to the use of synthetic insecticides. However, further detailed studies are suggested after identification of chemicals present in these extracts and their biological and toxicological activities against important insect pests like H. armigera.


Statement of conflict of interest

Authors have declared no conflict of interest.




Abdul, R. and Venkatesan, P., 2008. Larvicidal efficacy of five cucurbitaceous plant leaf extracts against mosquito species. Parasitol. Res., 103: 133-139.

Abedi, Z., Saber, M., Vojoudi, S., Mahdavi, V. and Parsaeyan, E., 2014. Acute, sublethal, and combination effects of azadirachtin and Bacillus thuringiensis on the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. J Insect Sci., 14: 30.

Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I. and Ahmad, Z., 1995. Monitoring insecticide resistance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. J. econ. Ent., 88: 771-776.

Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I. and Ahmad, Z., 1998b. Analysis of pyrethroid resistance in Helicoverpa armigera in Pakistan. Proc. Second World Cotton Res. Conf., Athens, Greece, pp. 697-700.

Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I. and Ahmad, Z., 1999. Patterns of resistance to organophosphate insecticides in field populations of Helicoverpa armigera in Pakistan. Pestic. Sci., 55: 626-632.<626::AID-PS988>3.0.CO;2-L

Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I. and Ahmad, Z., 2001. Resistance to carbamate insecticides in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Crop Protect., 20: 427-432.

Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I. and Attique, M.R., 1997. Pyrethroid resistance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Bull. entomol. Res., 87: 343-347.

Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I., Ahmad, Z. and Attique, M.R., 1998a. Helicoverpa armigera resistance to insecticides in Pakistan. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., pp. 1138-1140.

Ali, R., Javed, H. and Gulzar, A., 2016. Comparative development, survival and fecundity of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different chickpea cultivars. Pakistan J. Zool., 48: 249-255.

Arti, P. and Purohit, S., 2009. Evaluation of the morphological abnormalities in the 4th instar larva of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) On application of leaf extract of Lantana camara (L.). World J. Zool., 4: 253-255.

Avilla, C. and Gonza´lez-Zamora, J.E., 2010. Monitoring resistance of Helicoverpa armigera to different insecticides used in cotton in Spain. Crop Protect., 29: 100-103.

Bernays, E.A., 1983. Antifeedant in crop pest management. In: Natural products for innovative pest management (eds. D.L. Whitehead and W.S. Bowers). Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 259-271.

Biondi, A., Mommaerts, V., Smagghe, G., Vinuela, E., Zappala, L. and Desneux, N., 2012. The non-target impact of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods. Pest. Manage. Sci., 68: 1523-1536.

Bisset, J., Rodriguez, M., Soca, A., Pasteur, N. and Raymond, M., 1997. Cross-resistance to pyrethroid and organophosphorus insecticides in the southern house mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) from Cuba. J. med. Ent., 34: 244-246.

D’Incao, M.P., Gosmann, G., Machado, V., Fiuza, L.M. and Moreira, G.R.P., 2012. Effect of saponin extracted from Passiflora alata Dryander (Passifloraceae) on development of the Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Pl. Res., 2: 151-159.

Desneux, N., Decourtye, A. and Delpuech, J.M., 2007. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Ent., 52: 81-106.

Dong, Y., Zhang, M. and Ling, B., 2005. Antifeeding effects of crude lantadene from Lantana camara on Plutella xylostella and Spodeoptera litura larvae. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao, 16: 2361-2364.

Fakrudin, B., Kumar, V., Krishnareddy, K.B., Patil, B.V. and Kuruvinashetti, M.S., 2004. Morphometric differences between pyrethroid resistant and susceptible populations of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Resist. Pest Manage. News, 13: 18-19.

Georges, K., Jayaprakasam, B., Dalavoy, S.S. and Nair, M.G., 2008. Pest managing activities of plant extracts and anthraquinones from Cassia nigricans from Burkina faso. Biores. Technol., 99: 2037-2045.

Gontijo, P.C., Moscardini, V.F., Michaud, J.P. and Carvalho, G.A., 2014. Nontarget effects of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam on Chrysoperla carnea when employed as sunflower seed treatments. J. Pestic. Sci., 87: 711-719.

Guo, L., Desneux, N., Sonoda, S., Liang, P., Han, P. and Gao, X.W., 2013. Sublethal and transgenerational effects of chlorantraniliprole on biological traits of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. Crop Protet., 48: 29-34.

Hemati, S.A., Naseri, B. and Razmjou, J., 2013. Reproductive performance and growth indices of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on various host plants. J. Crop Prot., 2: 193-208.

Hui, W., Wang, J., Li, H.S., Dai, H.G. and Gu, X.J., 2010. Sub-lethal effects of fenvalerate on the development, fecundity, and juvenile hormone esterase activity of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Agric. Sci. China, 9: 1612-1622.

Hussain, A.I., Rathore, H.A., Sattar, M.Z.A. , Chatha, S.A.S., Sarker, S.D. and Gilani, A.H., 2014. Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad (bitterapplefruit): A review of its phytochemistry, pharmacology, traditional uses and nutritional potential. J. Ethnophar., 155: 54-66.

Kamaraj, C., Rahuman, A.A. and Bagavan, A., 2008. Screening for antifeedant and larvicidal activity of plant extracts against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Sylepta derogate (F) and Anopheles stephensi (Liston). Parasitol. Res., 103: 1361-1368.

Khalid, A.A., 2015. Aphidicidal activity of different aqueous extracts of bitter apple citrullus colocynthis (L.) Against the bird cherry-oat aphid, rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (homoptera: aphididae) under laboratory conditions. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 25: 456-462.

Khani, M., Awang, R.M., Omar, D. and Rahmani, M., 2013. Toxicity, antifeedant, egg hatchability and adult emergence effect of Piper nigrum L. and Jatropha curcas L. extracts against rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton). J. med. Pl. Res., 7: 1255-1262.

Koul, O., Daniewski, W.M., Multani, J.S., Gumulka, M. and Singh, G., 2003. Antifeedant effects of the limonodis from Entandrophragma candotei (Meliaceae) on the Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepdoptera: Noctuidae). J. Agric. Fd. Chem., 51: 7271-7275.

Le Ora Software, 1987. Polo-Pc. A User`s guide to probit or logit analysis. Berkely.

Liu, N. and Yue, X., 2000. Insecticide resistance and cross-resistance in the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J. econ. Ent., 93: 1269-1275.

Liu, S.Q., Shi, J.J., Cao, H., Jia, F.B., Liu, X.Q. and Shi, G.L., 2000. Survey of pesticidal component in plant, Entomology in China in 21st Century. In: Proceedings of Conference of Chinese Entomological Society (ed. L. Dianmo). Science and Technique Press, Beijing, China, pp. 1098-1104.

Ma, D., Gordh, G. and Zalucki, M.P., 2000. Biological effects of azadirachtin on Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fed on cotton and artificial diet. Australian J. Ent., 39: 301-304.

Manjunath T.M., Bhatnagar, V.S., Pawar, C.S. and Sithanantham, S., 1989. Economic importance of Heliothis spp. in India and an assessment of their natural enemies and host plants. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Biological Control of Heliothis: increasing the effectiveness of natural enemies. New Delhi, India, pp. 197-228.

Mansoor, F., Azaizeh, H., Saad, B., Tadmor, Y., Abo-Moch, F. and Said, O., 2004. The potential of Middle Eastern flora as a source of new safe bio-acaricides to control Tetranychus cinnabarinus, the carmine spider mite. Phytoparasitica, 32: 66-72.

Matthew, G.A., 2008. Insect and mite pest: General introduction. In: Insect pests of cotton (eds. G.A. Matthews and J.P. Tunstall). CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 29-37.

McCaffery, A.R., 1998. Resistance to insecticides in Heliothine Lepidoptera: a global view. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 353: 1-16.

Mordue, A.J., Morgan, E.D. and Nisbet, A.J., 2005. Azadirachtin, a natural product in insect control. In: Comprehensive molecular insect science (eds. L. Gilbert, K. Iatrou and S.S. Gill), Volume 6. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 117-135.

Mu˜noza, E., Lamillaa, C., Marin, J.C., Alarconc, J. and Cespedesa, C.L., 2013. Antifeedant, insect growth regulatory and insecticidal effects of Calceolaria talcana (Calceolariaceae) on Drosophila melanogaster and Spodoptera frugiperda. Indust. Crops Prod., 42: 137-144.

Mullai, K. and Jebanesan, A., 2007. Larvicidal, ovicidal and repellent activities of the leaf extract of two cucurbitacious plants against filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) (Diptera: Culicidae). Trop. Biomed., 24: 1-6.

Namin, R.F., Naseri, B. and Razmjou, J., 2014. Nutritional performance and activity of some digestive enzymes of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, in response to seven tested bean cultivars. J. Insect Sci., 14: 1-8.

Palumbi, S.R., 2008. Humans as the world’s greatest evolutionary force. Science, 293: 1786-1790.

Rahuman, A.A., Gopalakrishnan, G., Venkatesan, P. and Geetha, K., 2008. Larvicidal activity of some Euphorbiaceae plant extracts against Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol. Res., 102: 867-873.

Ramya, S., Rajasekaran, C., Kalaivani, T., Sundararajan, G. and Jayakumararaj, R., 2008. Biopesticidal effect of leaf extracts of Catharanthus roseus on the larvae of gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Ethnobot. Leafl., 12: 1096-1101.

Razmjou, J., Naseri, B. and Hemati, S.A., 2014. Comparative performance of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hu¨bner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on various host plants. J. Pestic. Sci., 87: 29-37.

Schmutterer, H., 1990. Properties and potential of natural pesticides from neem tree, Azadiracta indica. Annu. Rev. Ent., 35: 271-297.

Seenivasan, S.P., Jayakumar, M., Raja, N. and Ignacimuthu, S., 2004. Effect of bitter apple, Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad seed extracts against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Entomon, 29: 81-84.

Shi, X., Jiang, L., Wang, H., Qiao, K. Wang, D. and Wang, K., 2011. Toxicities and sublethal effects of seven neonicotinoid insecticides on survival, growth and reproduction of imidacloprid-resistant cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii. Pest Manage. Sci., 67: 1528-1533.

Sivaraman, G.M., Paulraj, G., Ignacimuthu1, S. and Al-Dhabi, N.A., 2014. Bioefficacy of Cleome viscosa and Sinapis alba seed extracts against Helicoverpa armigera (hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Pure appl. Zool., 2: 211-217.

Statistix Version 8.1, 2005. User’s manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, Florida.

Tabashnik, B.E. and Roush, R.T., 1990. Pesticide resistance in arthropods. Chapman and Hall, N.Y.

Tabashnik, B.E., 1994. Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu. Rev. Ent., 39: 47-79.

Tallamy, D.W., Stull, J., Ehresman, N.P., Gorski, P.M. and Mason, C.E., 1997. Cucurbitacins as feeding and oviposition deterrents to insects. Environ. Ent., 26: 678-683.

Teese, M.G., Farnsworth, C.A., Li, Y., Coppin, C.W. and Devonshire, A.L., 2013. Heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of fourteen esterases from Helicoverpa armigera. PLoS One, 8: e65951.

Thacker, J.M.R., 2002. An introduction to arthropod pest control. Cambridge University Press, pp. 343.

Torkey, H.M., Abou-Yousef, H.M., Azeiz, A.Z.A. and Farid, H.E.A., 2009. Insecticidal effect of cucurbitacin e glycoside isolated from Citrullus colocynthis against Aphis craccivora. Australian J. Basic appl. Sci., 3: 4060-4066.

Whalon, M.E., Mota-Sanchez, D. and Hollingworth, R.M., 2008. Analysis of global pesticide resistance in arthropods. In: Global pesticide resistance in arthropods (eds. M.E. Whalon, D. Mota-Sanchez and R.M. Hollingworth). CABI International, Wallingford, Oxon.

Wondafrash, M., Getu, E. and Terefe, G., 2012. Life-cycle parameters of African bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) affected by neem, Azadirachta indica extracts. Agric. Sci. Res. J., 2: 335-345.

Xu, Z., Cao, G.C. and Dong, S.L., 2010. Changes of sex pheromone communication systems associated with tebufenozoide and abamectin resistance in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). J. Chem. Ecol., 36: 526-534.

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology (Associated Journals)


Vol. 49, Iss. 5, Pages 1547-1936


Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Commons Attribution License

This license permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Creative Commons License
Follow ResearchersLinks