Research Article

Study to Determine the Effects of High Density plantation on Growth and Yield of Citrus

Waqas Ahmed Dogar2, Arshad Ali Khan3*, Saeed Ahmed2, Sudheer Tariq2, Mukhtar Ahmad2, Muhammad Imran2, Muhammad Noman2 and Nadeem Khan1

1Department of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan; 2Department of Horticultural Research and Development, NARC Islamabad; 3BRAINS Institute, Peshawar, Khayber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan.

Received | February 12, 2017; Accepted | May 18, 2017; Published | June 24, 2017

*Correspondence | Arshad Ali Khan, BRAINS Institute, Peshawar, Khayber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan; Email: arshadali41@gmail.com

Citation | Dogar, W.A., A.A. Khan, S. Ahmed, S. Tariq, M. Ahmad, M. Imran, M. Noman and N. Khan. 2017. Study to determine the effects of high density plantation on growth and yield of citrus. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 33(2): 315-319.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2017/33.2.315.319

Keywords | Citrus, Kinnow, Musambi, High density, Yield, Quality, Vigor

Introduction

Citrus plantings should be planned so that the biological and management aspects are interrelated to maximize economic returns. Hutton (1989) reported that changes in labor relations, government regulations, and tree loss rates require continual evaluation of citrus plantings to establish systems. In Florida a number of changes have occurred which affect returns from citrus production; land values and taxes have increased, certain zoning laws favor the agricultural production, availability of good land for citrus has decreased; citrus on poor soil type results in smaller tree size due to various limiting factors, loss of trees due to diseases has increased; and there have been increase in capital expenditures for equipments and irrigation, interest rates and labor costs. Due to these changes, citrus production in future must make more efficient use of limited land that provide more rapid recovery of invested capital in order to provide maximum net return. Zekri (2000) reported that tree spacing has become an increasingly important consideration in citrus rootstock management because of the benefits of higher tree density on early production and financial returns. Phillips (1978) reported that high density plantation may result in getting earlier return on investment, better spray coverage at less cost and easy harvesting in citrus. Keeping this in view the present study was initiated to find out the appropriate planting distance for citrus groves under the agro ecological conditions of Punjab province of Pakistan.

Materials and Method

The study was carried out at Postgraduate Agriculture Research Station (PARS), Institute of Horticultural Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad during 2012-2014 for the two consecutive years. The laboratory work was carried out at the Pomology Lab., Institute of Horticultural Sciences University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. Five years old 180 trees of Kinnow mandarin and Musambi were planted under drip irrigation of moderate vigor and health grafted on rough lemon rootstock which were grown at three planting distances. The experiment was laid out according to Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three treatments.

Factor A:

1. 1. Kinnow mandarin
2. 2. Musambi

Factor B:

T1: Trees at planting distance 11 x 22 ft

T2: Trees at planting distance 11 x 11 ft

T3: Conventional planting distance 22 x 22 ft

The present work was under taken by keeping three treatments replicated six times. Treatment units in one treatment (11 x 11 ft) were different, while the other two treatments were kept same. To determine the vigor of the trees, stem girth, plant height, number of new flushes, number of new leaves/flush, number of older leaves/flush, fruit set (%) and yield were measured according to the standard procedure. Girth measurement was taken at a fixed height of 25 cm above the graft union; position was fixed for all the treatments. The measurements were analyzed by the least significant difference. No hedging or pruning of the trees was done. Height of the tree was measured with the help of telescopic pole.

Data of new flushes was taken by counting the number of new flushes from the tagged branches from four sides of the tree. Number of new leaves was counted from the new flushes on the tagged branches of the citrus. Number of older leaves was counted from the branches tagged in all the four sides of the plant. When bloom was over, fruit set on the selected trees was counted on marked branches in the third week of April 2012. Fruit set percentage was determined by using the following formula:

Total bloom

Yield was recorded by counting the total number of fruits per plant at the time of harvesting.

Maximum plant height of 123.60 cm was recorded in plants of T2 (11x11ft) which was significantly higher than the plants of other treatments while minimum plant height (84.73 cm) was measured in plants of T3 (22x22ft). Maximum plant height of 115.07 cm was recorded in V2 (Musambi) and that were statistically higher from V1 (Kinnow) where height was 95.78cm. This is mainly due to the competition for light in plants at close spacing and shadows effect during morning and evening hours. So naturally for active photosynthetic reaction plant produce terminal branches. Similar results regarding plant height were also reported by Sharma et al. (1992), Athani et al. (2009) and Nasir et al. (2006) who reported that close plantation increased the plant height.

Stem Girth (cm)

Maximum plant girth of 17.943 cm was recorded in plants of T3 (22x22ft) which was wider spacing and significantly different from plants of other treatments. Minimum stem girth (16.552 cm) was found in plants of T2 (11x11ft). Maximum stem girth of 21.762 cm was recorded in plants of V2 (Musambi) which was statistically different from the plant of V1. Minimum stem girth (12.675 cm) was found in V1. Bassal (2009) reported that stem girth was more in wider spacing as compared to close plantation and main phenomenon of stem girth increased may be due to genetic makeup of plant. In addition to this, our results confirms the finding of Tachibana (1998) who reported that with increase in plant spacing, there was an incremental trend in stem girth in normal spacing as compared to closer spacing.

Maximum new leaves (198.29) were recorded in plants that were transplanted at 11x22ft (T1) and these were significantly higher than the plants of other treatments while minimum new leaves (198.29) were found in plants of T2 (11x11ft). Maximum new leaves of 195.75 were recorded in plants of V2 (Musambi) and these were statistically more than leaves (188.94) in the plants of V1 (Kinnow). This was mainly due to more light penetration in optimum spacing which promotes vegetative growth. It was found by Nawaz (2007) that light intensity and quality improved the vegetative growth in citrus in optimum plantation.

Maximum flowers per plant of 441.58 were recorded in plants of T1 (11 x 22 ft) and these were significantly higher from the plants of other treatments. Minimum flowers per plant (361.97) were found in plants of T2 (11 x 11ft). Maximum numbers of flowers per plant of 406.93 were recorded in plants of V2 and these were significantly higher than the plants of V1 (380.59). The interaction effect showed that the plant of V2 (Musambi) attained maximum no of flowers per plant of 493.13 in T3(11x22ft), while minimum no of flowers per plant of 336.53 was recorded in plant of V2 (Musambi) those were planted at (11x11ft). Wider spacing (HDP) increased number of plants per acre as compared to those plants planted at close spacing. Fruit setting is a genetic factor and is directly related to plant nutrients and cultural practices (Khan et al., 2014). It can be concluded that 11 x 22ft plant spacing in Musambi has significant effect on flowers per plant and in close spacing number of flowers per plant were minimum.

Fruit setting percentage

Maximum fruit setting percentage of 74.00% were recorded in plants of T2 (11x11ft) that were significantly higher than the plants of other treatments. Minimum fruit setting percentages (57.117%) were found in plants of T3 (22x22ft). Maximum fruit setting percentage of 79.222 was recorded in plants of V2 and those was statistically higher from V1, while minimum fruit setting percentage (52.70%) was found in plants of V1. Our results confirmed the findings of the Nawaz et al. (2007) who reported that fruit setting percentage was increased with decreased plant spacing.

It can be concluded that 11x11ft plant spacing in Musambi had significantly increased fruit length. In general, length of Musambi was more than Kinnow Mandarin. Similarly Khan et al. (2014) reported that fruit length is directly related to mineral nutrition and also depends on genetic makeup.

Fruit yield per plant (kg)

Among all treatments, on average maximum fruit yield per plant (3.6373 kg) was recorded in T1 (11x22ft), while minimum was recorded in T 2 (11x11ft), whereas, V2 gave better fruit yield per plant (3.1395 kg) than V1 (1.8313 kg). In comparison of both treatments and varieties at T2 fruit yields per plant were 2.70 and 4.57 kg in V1 (Kinnow) and V2 (Musambi), respectively. At T1 fruit yield per plant was 1.01 and 2.23 kg against V1 (Kinnow) and V2 (Musambi), respectively. And at T3 fruits per plant were 1.78 and 2.61 kg on plants of V1 (Kinnow) and V2 (Musambi), respectively. Our results confirmed the findings of Boswell et al. (1970), Monga et al. (1995) and Nawaz et al. (2007) who found that optimum plant spacing increased the fruit yield per plant.

Conclusion

As the value of land is increasing and the available land for cultivation is decreasing, in this condition high density plantation is very important and effective as in its greatest amount of fruit bearing volume per hectare would be attained. Our preliminary results showed that T1 (11 x 22 ft.) can prove better for satisfactory yields of the fruit. Whereas in T2 (11 x 11 ft.) although the yield per hectare is increased but the fruits were of small sized. However, for further recommendations systematic efforts are required to study the relationship between planting densities and yield as well as quality of the fruit.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to University of Faisalabad and NARC, Pakistan for technical and financial support and facilitating the research study.

Authors Contribution

WAD designed and supervised the overall research activities. MA, ST, NK and MI collected the data and supervised the research activities at the field level. AAK helped in the statistical analysis and article submission. MN, SA and MA helped in writing the manuscript.

References

Athani, S.I. and P.R. Dharmatti. 2009. Effect of plant density on growth and yield in banana. Karnataka. J. Agric. Sci. 22:143-146.

Bassal, M.A. 2009. Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Marisol’ clementine grown on four rootstocks in Egypt. Sci. Horticult. 119(2):132-137.

Boswell, S.B., L.N. Lewis, C.D. Mecarty and K.W. Hench. 1970. Tree spacing of Wasingtton Navel orange. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95 (5):523-528.

Hutton, R.J. 1989. The Influence of free size control and plant density on citrus productivity. Acta Hortic. 175:200-204.

Khan, A.A., M. Sajid and A. Rab. 2014. Mineral uptake by tomato cultivars as affected by organic and inorganic potassium amendments. Int. J. Biosci. 5(10): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.10.1-9

Khan, A.A., M. Sajid and A. Rab. 2014. Tomato fruit quality as affected by different sources of phosphorus. Pak. J. Nutr. 13(12): 692-699. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2014.692.699

Monga, P.K., P.S. Aulakh, N. Kaur and P.K. Arora. 2011. Effect of high density plantation on tree growth, fruit yield and quality in Kinnow mandarin. J. Res. Punjab agric. Univ. 48:40-42.

Nasir, M.A., A. Aziz, T.A. Mohar, S. Ahmad and M.A. Rehman. 2006. Effect of plant spacing on the growth and quality of kinnow under Sargodha climatic conditions. Sarhad J. Agric. 22: 37-40.

Nawaz, M.A., W. Ahmed, Z. Iqbal and M.M. Khan. 2007. Evaluation of high density plantation on vigor and yield in kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata B). pp. 87-92. In: K.M. Shouq (ed.). Proceeding International Symposium Prospects Hort. Ind. Pakistan. 28-30 March, 2007. Inst. Hort. Sci., Uni. Agric. Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Phillips, R.L. 1978. Citrus free spacing and size control. Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture, 319-324.

Sharma J.N., G.S. Chohan, V.K. Vij and P.K. Monga. 1992. Effect of spacings on growth, yield and quality of kinnow mandarin. Indian J. Hort. 49: 158-164.

Tachibana, S. 1998. Effect of planting density on tree growth and vertical distribution of foliage and fruit on satsuma mandarin tree. J. Jp. Soc. Hort. Sci. 67(1): 66-73.

Zekri, M. 2000. Evaluation of orange trees budded on several rootstocks and planted at high density on flat woods soil. Proc. Fla. Stat Hort. Soc. 113:119-123.