Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Length-Weight Relationship of the Invasive Mosquitofish

PJZ_52_3_1197-1200

 

 

Length-Weight Relationship of the Invasive Mosquitofish

Wen Xiong1,2*, Qitao Zeng2, Dangen Gu1 and Yinchang Hu1*

1Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences/ Key Laboratory of Recreational Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Guangzhou 510380, China

2College of Fisheries, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China

ABSTRACT

This study presents 49 length-weight relationships gathered from literature and our investigation pertaining to Gambusia affinis and G. holbrooki. The value of the slope b ranged from 2.44 for male G. holbrooki in Tajan River (Iran) to 3.81 for combined G. holbrooki in reservoirs of Segura River basin (Spain). The mean value of b was 3.11 (SD =0.30), which significantly higher than 3 (t-test, p<0.05). The median value of b was 3.15 and 50% of the b values ranged between 2.95 and 3.31.


Article Information

Received 22 April 2019

Revised 01 June 2019

Accepted 06 July 2019

Available online 18 March 2020

Authors’ Contribution

WX performed the experiments, designed the research and wrote the paper. QZ and DG analyzed the data. YH conducted the research.

Key words

Invasive, Mosquitofish, Length-weight relationship, Gambusia affinis, Growth parameter

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20190422150443

* Corresponding author: chinaxiongwen@gmail.com;

huyc22@163.com

0030-9923/2020/0003-1197 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2020 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Length-weight relationships (LWRs) are an important tool for fish biology and fisheries management (Froese, 2006; Froese et al., 2011). Researchers can determine fish weight from length or vice versa (Sasi and Ozay, 2017; Xiong et al., 2018a, b). Thus, understanding LWRS can be very useful tool for ichthyologists because of limited by resources and time.

Mosquitofish (including Gambusia holbrooki and Gambusia affinis) are small fish native to the North America and have been introduced to all continents except Antarctia (Pyke, 2005). They are probably the most widely distributed freshwater fish in the world (Pyke, 2008) and western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) were listed in the world’s 100 worst invasive alien species by IUCN (Global Invasive Species Programme, http://www.issg.org/database). Western mosquitofish was introduced into China Taiwan in 1911, and into China mainland in 1924 (Cheng et al., 2018) and now occurred and widespread wetlands in southern China (Xiong et al., 2015a, 2019). Many studies have shown that western mosquitofish negatively affect native amphibians in native (Zelber and Sutton, 2008) and non-native habitat (Gamradt and Kats, 1996; Goodsell and kats, 1999; Segev et al., 2009; Shulse and Semlitsch, 2014). In China, western mosquitofish has been implicated in the decline of native endangered fish (Li and Xie, 2002; Xiong et al., 2018c) and amphibian (Dudgeon and Corlett, 1994). A large amount of literature exists with regard to two mosquitofish. However, our knowledge of western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) and Eastern mosquitofish (G. holbrooki) biology is also surprisingly patchy and limited because of complex distributions and difficult to separate with certainty (Pyke, 2008). In this study, length-weight relationships were estimated for western mosquitofish from wetlands of the central Yangtze River, and we gathered 46 length-weight relationships from literature for western mosquitofish and eastern mosquitofish from world.

 

Materials and methods

The study was carried out in some wetlands along side Donghu Lake (30°31′-30°36′N, 114°21′-114°28′E) in Wuhan, Hubei Province, central of the Yangtze River. West mosquitofish specimens were caught periodically every season from May 2012 to January 2013 (20-27 May, 15-22 August, 11-19 November 2012, and 22-30 January 2013). Captured by dip nets, they were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (total length, L) and weighed to the nearest 0.01g (Weight, W). For detailed sampling methods see Xiong et al. (2015b). West mosquitofish were classified as males if they possessed any evidence of a gonopodium, and as females in the case of the absence of gonopodium. When this was not possible (usually TL<13mm), sex was determined by the direct observation of gonads. Length-weight relationship was calculated using the expression: W= aLb, where the W is the weight (g) and L the length (cm), the parameters a and b is the intercept (coefficient related to body


 

form) and the slope, respectively (Froese, 2006). The 95% confidence of limits of a and b were determined.

All length-weight relationships of two mosquitofish are the product of field studies conducted during 2004-2013 in freshwater and estuary of the world. For the majority of the original length-weight relationships (w=aLb), length was in cm and weight in g (43 relationships out 49; 88%), whereas for 6 (12%), length and weight were expressed in mm and g. For all length-weight relationships presented here, length has been expressed in cm and weight in g. Based on our field investigations and literature review, this study is the first report on preliminary length-weight relationship of mosquitofish in the world (Supplementary Table I).

 

Results and discussion

Overall, 49 length-weight relationships (Supplementary Table 1) were gathered from literature and our investigation, referring to two mosquitofish, including female, male and combined. Thereinto, 25 length-weight relationships refer to G. holbrooki (6 females, 6male, and 13 combined), other 24 to G. affinis (6 females, 5 males and 13 combined).

The value of the slope b in the plot of Log W against Log L ranged from 2.44 for male G. holbrooki in Tajan River (Iran) to 3.81 for combined G. holbrooki in reservoirs of Segura River basin (Spain). The mean value of b was 3.11 (SD =0.30), which significantly higher than 3 (t-test, p<0.05). The median value of b was 3.15 and 50% of the b values ranged between 2.95 and 3.31.

The plot of log a vs b for all known length-weight relationships of s species results in a species results in a linear relationship, and that this relationship can be used to identify outliers (Froese, 2000). We have applied this method to two mosquitofish (Fig. 1). This method led to the detection of outliers, where the respective point deviated more than two standard deviations from the regression line. These length-weight relationships were marked as “questionable” in Supplementary Table I.

 

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No 31472016) and open fund of Key Laboratory of Recreational Fisheries, ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas (2019N03). We acknowledge reviewers’ suggestive comments.

 

Supplementary material

There is supplementary material associated with this article. Access the material online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20190422150443

 

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

 

References

Andreu-Soler, A., Oliva-Paterna, F.J. and Torralva, M., 2006. J. appl. Ichthyol., 22: 295-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00719.x

Cheng, Y., Xiong, W., Tao, J., He, D.K., Chen, K. and Chen, Y.F., 2018. BioInvasions Rec., 7: 309-318. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2018.7.3.13

Dudgeon, D. and Corlett, R.T., 1994. Hills and streams: An ecology of Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.

Dulcic, J. and Glamuzina, B., 2006. J. appl. Ichthyol., 22: 254-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00633.x

Erguden, S.A., 2013. Iran. J. Fish. Sci., 12: 204-218.

Erguden, S.A. and Goksu, M.Z.L., 2009. J. appl. Ichthyol., 25: 501-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01231.x

Esmaeili, H.R. and Ebrahimi M., 2006. J. appl. Ichthyol., 22: 328-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00653.x

Froese, R., 2000. In: Fish Base 2000: concepts, design and data sources (eds. R. Froese and D. Pauly). ICLARM, Los Bauos, laguna, Philippines. pp. 133.

Froese, R., 2006. J. appl. Ichthyol., 22: 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x

Froese, R., Tsikliras, A.C. and Stergiou, K.I., 2011. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat., 41: 261-263. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2011.41.4.01

Gamradt, S.C. and Kats, L.B., 1996. Conserv. Biol., 10: 1155-1162. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041155.x

Gilligan, D., 2010. The condition of freshwater fish assemblages in the bellinger catchment, NSW. A report to the Northern Rivers catchment management Authority. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/400495/AE_2011_Output-1805_Gilligan_Bellingen-Ecohealth-Report_REPORT.pdf

Gkenas, C., Oikonomou, A., Economou, A., Kiosse, F. and Leonardos, I., 2012. J. Biol. Res., 17: 121-136.

Goodsell, J.A. and Kats, L.B., 1999. Conserv. Biol., 13: 921-924. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98237.x

Gossman, B.P., 2005. Use of terraced marsh habitats by estuarine nekton in southwestern Louisiana. MS Thesis. University of Florida.

Kimmerer, W., Avent, S.R. and Bollens, S.M., 2005. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 134: 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1577/T04-042.1

Koutrakis, E.T. and Tsikliras, A.C., 2003. J. appl. Ichthyol., 19: 258-260. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00456.x

Li Q., Xu R.L. and Huang J.R., 2013. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat., 43: 65-69. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2013.43.1.09

Li, Z.Y., Xie, Y., 2002. Invasive alien species in China. Forestry Press, Beijing.

Moreno-Valcarcel, R., Oliva-Paterna, F.J., Arribas, C. and Fernandez-Delgado, C., 2012. J. appl. Ichthyol., 28: 663-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2012.01933.x

Ozturk, S. and Ikiz, R., 2004. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 28: 355-361.

Petriki, O., Gousia, E. and Bobori, D.C., 2011. J. appl. Ichthyol., 27: 939-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01578.x

Pyke, G.H., 2005. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher., 15: 339-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-006-6394-x

Pyke, G.H., 2008. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 39: 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173451

Rahman, P., Mohsen, G. Ali G. and Hoda, A., 2011. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limn., 29: 167-173.

Ruiz-Campos, G., Acosta, A.F.G. and Aguero, D.L.C., 2006. J. appl. Ichthyol., 22: 314-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00780.x

Sasi, H. and Ozay, G.G., 2017. Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 1571-1580. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.5.1571.1580

Sedaghat, S. and Hoseini, S.A., 2012. World J. Fish Mar. Sci., 4: 530-532.

Segev, O., Mangel, M. and Blaustein, L., 2009. Anim. Conserv., 12: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00217.x

Shulse, C.D. and Semlitsch, R.D., 2014. Hydrobiologia, 723: 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1502-0

Singh, N. and Gupta, P.K., 2008. J. Inland Fish. Soc. India, 40: 82-85.

Tang, J.F., Ye, S.W., Liu, J.S., Zhang, T.L., Zhu, F.Y., Guo, Z.Q. and Li, Z.J., 2013. J. appl. Ichthyl., 29: 1179-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12188

Tarkan, A.S., Gaygusuz, O., Acipinar, H., Gursoy, C. and Ozulug, M., 2006. J. appl. Ichthyol., 22: 271-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00711.x

Tarkan, A.S., Ozulug, M., Gaygusuz, O., Gaygusuz, C.G. and Sac, G., 2009. J. appl. Ichthyol., 25: 230-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01201.x

Xiong, W., Sui, X.Y., Liang, S.H. and Chen, Y.F., 2015a. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher., 25: 651-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-015-9396-8

Xiong, W., Tao, J., Zhang, D.C., Liu, C.L., He, D.K. and Chen, Y.F., 2015b. J. appl. Ichthyol., 31: 219-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12484

Xiong, W., Tao, J., Liu, C.L., Liang, Y.Y., Sun, H.Y., Chen, K., Cheng, Y. and Chen, Y.F., 2019. Aquat. Ecosyst. Hlth Manage., UAEM-2019-0035

Xiong, W., Zhu, G.P., Wang, Z.L. and Ye, N., 2018a. J. appl. Ichthyol., 34: 167-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13516

Xiong, W., Zhu, X.W., Xie, D. and Pan, C.H., 2018b. J. appl. Ichthyol., 34: 729-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13588

Xiong, W., Wang, Q., Xie, D., Fletcher, D.H. and He, D.K., 2018c. Knowl. Manage. aquat. Ecosyst., 419: 6. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2017054

Zelber, R.A. and Sutton, T.M., 2008. J. Freshw. Ecol., 23: 663-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2008.9664254

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

June

Vol. 52, Iss. 3, Pages 825-1224

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe