Judicious use of Saline Water for Growing Sorghum Fodder through the Application of Organic Matter
Judicious use of Saline Water for Growing Sorghum Fodder through the Application of Organic Matter
Ghulam Murtaza1*, Ghulam Sarwar1, Noor-Us-Sabah1, Mukkram Ali Tahir1, Fakhar Mujeeb2, Sher Muhammad3, Muhammad Zeeshan Manzoor1 and Ayesha Zafar1
1Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan; 2Soil Bacteriology Section, Ayub Agriculture Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan; 3Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abstract | The use of saline irrigation water leads to the buildup of salts in root zone, resulting in decreased yield and deterioration in soil resource. Continues use of organic manures, help in the reduction of salt concentration in the root zone. Organic matter was used to mitigate the negative effects of saline water irrigation using sorghum as test crop during summer, 2018. In this experiment water of 3 different types was applied coupled with addition of organic matter at 2 different rates. The experiment comprised of 9 treatments having 4 replications; T1 = canal water, T2 = saline water having EC value 2 dS m-1, T3 = saline water having EC value 3 dS m-1, T4 = T1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1, T5 = T2 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1, T6 = T3 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1, T7 = T1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1, T8 = T2 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1 and T9 = T3 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1. The experiment was laid according to randomized complete block design (RCBD). Sorghum cultivar “Hegari” was grown as a test crop. Data regarding plant parameters such as height of sorghum plants, diameter of stem, number of plants/ m2, total biomass of fresh plants were noted. Among all the treatments, T7 (T1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) performed the best which produced the highest values of growth parameters. However, the treatment T3 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1) proved inferior to all others with respect to height of sorghum plants, diameter of stem, number of plants m-2, total biomass of fresh plants. All the collected data were analyzed by using statistix 8.1, ANOVA technique and significance of treatment were compared by using Tukey’s (HSD) test at 5% probability level.
Received | September 04, 2019; Accepted | December 06, 2019; Published | January 22, 2020
*Correspondence | Ghulam Murtaza, Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Murtaza, G., G. Sarwar, N.U. Sabah, M.A. Tahir, F. Mujeeb, S. Muhammad, M.Z. Manzoor and A. Zafar. 2020. Judicious use of saline water for growing sorghum fodder through the application of organic matter. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 33(1): 106-112.
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2020/33.1.106.112
Keywords | Canal water, Brackish water, Sorghum, Organic matter
Introduction
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is ranked at fifth number among cereal crops (Iqbal et al., 2010). It belongs to the Graminae family and is well adapted to semi-arid regions (Sharif et al., 2014). Sorghum is the cheapest source of micronutrients and energy after pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Majority of people in Africa and central India are dependent on sorghum to fulfill their energy demand and micronutrients need (Rao et al., 2006). Sorghum being used as forage crop is grown normally in summer season that is used as feed in the livestock production (Saini, 2012). Sorghum is C4 plant having greater ability to tolerate biotic and abiotic stresses as well as greater ability to process photosynthesis (Reddy et al., 2009). Sorghum is an important source of protein and energy in Africa and China (Elkhier and Hamid, 2008). The nutritional value of sorghum is similar to that of corn and because of its modern and wonderful nature animals enjoy it; therefore, the preferred species are those that produce both grain and stover (Habib et al., 2013). Sorghum provides not only food and forage but it also plays an important role in supplying raw materials like biofuel, starch, fiber, grapefruit syrup, alcohol and other byproducts (Mehmood et al., 2008).
Irrigation with saline water is one of the key factors that limits crop yield because most of the water available for irrigation is unfit for irrigating crops due to the presence of excessive concentration of salts (Fuller et al., 2012). Continuous irrigation of crops with saline water results in the rise in the EC of the soil (Kim et al., 2016). Saline water irrigation has negative impacts on soil water plant relationship, sometimes limiting the physiological activities of the plants and eventually the production of crops (Plaut et al., 2013). There is a need to minimize the toxicity of salts and to improve soil properties by the use of cost-effective approaches such as application of organic manure in the soil (Shaaban et al., 2013). Almost every plant growth and development stages are affected by salinity but the growth of seedling and germination percentage differs depending upon the plant species (Gul and Weber, 1999). The presence of high concentration of salt affects the germination of seedlings, restrict the uptake of water causing ions to be disrupted resulting to osmotic stress and specific ion toxicity. Salinity decreases soil water potential leading to osmotic stress (Khan and Panda, 2008). It has been found that a reduction in biomass, changes in the capacity of photosynthesis in the water of foliated leaf potential leaves is caused by salinity (Gama et al., 2007). Intensive salt concentration amplified the concentration of Na+ and Cl- while reduces the level of K+ and Ca2+ which results in a decreased pigment content of leaves (Mansour et al., 2005). The canal water is not enough to meet crop requirements. Consequently, the installation of private wells is growing, unfortunately, about 70-75% of the pumped groundwater is not fit for irrigation because of EC, SAR and RSC values are more than the normal which affects crops growth negatively (Ghafoor et al., 2001). In rhizosphere salts are accumulated due to application of saline water (Patel et al., 2000).
The management of salt affected soils involves use of combined agricultural practices based on the quality of water, existing agricultural system, chemical modification and local conditions, including climate, economics and environment of the crops (Amezketa et al., 2005). In order to overcome the saltiness not even a single procedure have been invented but many other practices that perform adequately were used by scientists (Mashali, 1995). Effective tools to alter and uses of several modifications to improve the saline soil properties which may be either chemical or physical were compiled by scientists after a lot of research (Hanay et al., 2004). The benefits of adding organic materials in this regard are due to their role in upgrading, modifying and altering the soil characteristics as well as their role as a fertilizer. Organic manure and compost have been tested for their efficacy as some organic amendments in the recovery of saline soils (Wahid et al., 2015). For the reclamation of sandy soil, use of organic matter alone is little but its effectiveness to perk up physical property of soil is well documented in the literature (Mamo et al., 2000).
Organic matter is material that has come from a recently living organism. It is capable of decay, or is the product of decay; or is composed of organic compounds. The organic matter in soil comes from plants and animals. The addition of organic materials like poultry manure, farmyard manure (FYM), compost and crop residues are being recommended and utilized for a long time due to its importance as a source of nutrients required by crop plants and its role in altering and modifying the physio-chemical properties of the soil (Ahmad et al., 2007). The most commonly available source of organic matter is FYM whose efficiency depends upon its composition which varies depending upon the age and type of animal, nature of the feed consumed by animal and waste management methods (Iqbal et al., 2008). The purpose of this research was to examine the role of water salinity management technique (use of organic matter) for the growth of sorghum when continuously irrigated with saline water under local conditions.
Materials and Methods
This experimental trail was conducted at research area of College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha sited 32.08o North range and 72.67o East longitude. Its elevation is above the sea degree is 193 meters.
This study was performed in randomized complete block design (RCBD) design with 9 treatments that were replicated four times. The plot size was 3.5m × 3.5m having row to row spacing of 75 cm and plant to plant distance 25 cm. The treatments of the experiments were as under:
T1 = Canal water
T2 = Water of EC 2.0 dS m-1
T3 = Water of EC 3.0 dS m-1
T4 = T1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1
T5 = T2 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1
T6 = T3 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1
T7 = T1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1
T8 = T2 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1
T9 = T3 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1
Before sowing the sorghum seeds, the seed beds were prepared by ploughing the soil with tractor-installed cultivar. Organic matter in the form of FYM was added to the respective treatment plots. Sorghum cultivar “Hegari” was sown @ 40 kg acre-1. To keep 25 cm plant to plant distance extra plants were uprooted. The hoeing was done two times in the whole growing season to reduce weed-crop competition. The crop was firstly irrigated after 10 days of germination while other irrigations were applied to the crop according to water requirements of the crops. Fertilizers like Urea, Single super phosphate (SOP) and Sulphate of potash (SOP) were the N, P, K sources used in the experiment. These fertilizers were applied @ 80, 60, 60 kg ha-1 for N, P and K respectively. At maturity crop was harvested, parameters like biomass, plant height, plant diameter and number of plants m-2 were noted. The analysis was made following the procedure written in Hand Book 60 of U.S Laboratory Staff (1969).
Statistical analysis
All data was statistically analyzed by statistix 8.1 ANOVA technique by comparing the significance of treatments through Tukey’s (HSD) test at 5% probability level (Steel et al., 1997).
Results and Discussion
Plant height (cm)
Sorghum is grown for both grain and fodder purposes, so increase in height of plants resulted in increased forage production. Data indicated that the height of plants was affected significantly by the use of canal and saline water with and without organic matter. Data displayed in the Figure 1 showed that maximum height of plants (199 cm) was obtained in the treatment T7 (canal water + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) followed by T4 (canal water + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) and T8 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) that produced 191.75 and 188 cm respectively. However, T8 and T4 were significant with each other in terms of statistics. Plant heights of 183.25, 176 and 174.5 cm were noted in treatment T1 (canal water), T9 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) and T5 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) respectively. Treatments T5 and T9 were found non-significant when statistically compared. The lowest value of plant height (163.75 cm) was observed in treatment T3 where water of EC 3.0 dS m-1 was used for irrigation followed by T2 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1) and T6 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) that produced 169.5 and 170 cm respectively (Figure 1). These research outcomes are favored by the findings of Abou El-Magd et al. (2008) who asked that the use of organic matter increased the sweet fennel height by alleviating the destructive of saline water. Similar results were given by Das et al. (2013) who described that application of organic matter reduced the stress of salts and improved the plant height of corn as well as forage production.
Stem diameter (cm)
Stem diameter of sorghum is of great importance for better yield of forage. As increase in diameter of stem will result in increased forage yield. Data demonstrated that stem diameter of sorghum was significantly affected by applying canal and saline water with and without organic matter. The use of canal water along with 10 Mg ha-1 organic matter (T7) produced maximum stem diameter (2.6 cm) followed by treatment T4 (canal water + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) and T1 (canal water) that both produced stem diameter of 2.52 cm (Figure 2). However, treatments T7, T4 and T1 were non-significant when compared statistically. Treatment T5 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) and T8 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) both produced stem diameter of 2.2 cm. The treatment T9 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) and T2 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1) both produced stem diameter of 2.1 cm. The minimum diameter of stem (1.9 cm) was recorded in the treatment T3 where water having EC 3 dS m-1 was applied which was followed by treatment T6 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) that produced stem diameter of 2.0 cm (Figure 2). Same were the outcomes of Idrees et al. (2004) that FYM when applied significantly increased the stem diameter of sugarcane under the conditions of saline irrigation. These research findings are favored by the outcomes of Almodares et al. (2008) that increasing the level of salinity caused a reduction in diameter of stem as well as stem yield.
Number of plants/m2
In sorghum, plants/m2 is key selection criteria for better productivity. As increase in number of plants/m2 will result in increased plant population as well as photosynthesis leading to enhanced accumulation of photosynthates resulting in more grain yield. Data demonstrated that plants/m2 of sorghum were drastically affected by applying canal and saline water with and without organic matter. Treatment T7 where canal water was used along with 10 Mg ha-1 organic matter was achieved as the best amendment which produced maximum number of plants/ m2 (32) followed by T4 (canal water + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) and T8 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) that both produced 30 plants/m2 (Figure 3). The treatment T1 where canal water was applied and treatment T5 where water of EC 2.0 dS m-1 was applied along with 5 Mg ha-1organic matter both produced 29 plants/ m2. However, these treatments T1 and T5 were non-significant with each other in terms of statistics. The minimum number of plants/m2 (23) were gained in the T3 where water of EC 3 dS m-1 was used followed by T6 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) and T2 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1) that both produced 25 plants/m2 (Figure 3). These research findings are favored by outcomes of Mirza et al. (2005) who said that applying saline water decreased the germination percentage of cauliflower and rice. Same work was also reported by Zeng and Shannon (2000) that increased level of salinity lowered the seedling survival resulting in reduced number of plants as well as decreased tillering in rice.
Fresh biomass weight (Mg ha-1)
In sorghum, fresh weight is also a vital selection criterion which determines forage yield. As increase in fresh weight will results in increased productivity of green fodder. Data indicated that fresh weight of sorghum was significantly affected by applying canal and saline water with and without organic matter. The highest fresh weight of 61.03 Mg ha-1was observed in treatment T7 where canal water was used along with 10 Mg ha-1following T4 where canal water was used along with 5 Mg ha-1organic matter and T1 (canal water) that produced fresh weight of 59.08 and 57.33 Mg ha-1 respectively (Figure 4). However, T1 and T4 were non-significant with each other statistically. Fresh biomass of 54.49, 52.37 and 47.13 Mg ha-1 was taken from treatment T8 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1), T5 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) and T2 (water of EC 2.0 dS m-1) respectively. The minimum fresh weight of 41.19 Mg ha-1 was observed in T3 where water having EC 3 dS m-1 was used and it was followed by T6 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 5 Mg ha-1) and T9 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1 + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) that produced 43.31 and 45.78 Mg ha-1 respectively (Figure 4). These research outcomes are similar as given by Abou El-Magd et al. (2008) who found enhanced fresh weight of sweet fennel by applying organic matter which reduced the detrimental effects of saline water. Similarly, Alam et al. (2016) asked that addition of organic matter like FYM and poultry manure enhanced the growth and productivity of rice. These results are similar to the outcomes of Sarwar et al. (2008) who depicted that the addition of compost at different rates enhanced the content of phosphorus in soil along with other macro nutrients essential by plants.
Conclusions and Recommendations
It was concluded after analyzing results that addition of organic matter proved effective in minimizing the damaging property of saline water. The results demonstrated that application of organic matter decreased lethal impacts of saline water on growth of sorghum by improving the properties of soil. Among all the treatments, T7 (canal water + organic matter @ 10 Mg ha-1) performed the best which produced highest values of sorghum biomass, plant height, plant diameter and number of plants/m2. However, treatment T3 (water of EC 3.0 dS m-1) remained inferior to all others by affecting all growth parameters negatively.
Author’s Contribution
Ghulam Murtaza: Conception and design of the work, Conduction of experiment and write up.
Ghulam Sarwar: Academic Supervisor and guided throughout the research tenure.
Noor-Us-Sabah: Co-supervision, Interpretation of data and proof reading.
Mukkarram Ali Tahir: Supervision, Drafting and technical assistance at every step.
Fakhar Mujeeb: Technical assistance at every step.
Sher Muhammad: Contributed in statistical analysis.
Muhammad Zeeshan Manzoor: Member of research group and helped in data collection.
Ayesha Zafar: Member of research group and helped in laboratory analysis.
References
Abou El-Magd, M.M., M.F. Zaki and S.D. Abou-Hussein. 2008. Effect of organic manure and different levels of saline irrigation water on growth, green yield and chemical content of sweet fennel. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 2(1): 90-98.
Ahmad, A., I. Qadir and N. Mahmood. 2007. Effect of integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers on fodder yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 44(3); 415-421.
Ahmed, B.O., M. Inoue and S. Moritani. 2010. Effect of saline water irrigation and manure application on the available water content, soil salinity, and growth of wheat. Agric. Water Manage., 97(1): 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.09.001
Ahmed, B.O., T. Yamamoto and M. Inoue. 2007. Response of drip irrigated sorghum varieties growing in dune sand to salinity levels in irrigation water. J. Appl. Sci. 7(7): 1061-1066. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.1061.1066
Alam, M.Z., D.K. Das, M.A. Hashem and M.A. Hoque. 2016. Soil amendments with farm yard manure and poultry manure confer tolerance to salt stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Res. Agric. Livest. Fish., 3(3): 379-386. https://doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v3i3.30728
Almodares, A., M.R. Hadi and H. Ahmadpour. 2008. Sorghum stem yield and soluble carbohydrates under different salinity levels. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7(22): 4051-4055.
Amezketa, E.A., R. Aragues and R. Gazol. 2005. Efficiency of sulfuric acid, mined gypsum and two gypsum by-products in soil crusting prevention and sodic soil reclamation. Agron. J., 97: 983-989. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0236
Das, D.K., B.R. Dey, M.J.A. Mian and M.A. Hoque. 2013. Mitigation of the adverse effects of salt stress on maize (Zea mays L.) through organic amendments. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol., 1(4): 233-239. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v1i4.9128
Elkhier, M.K.S. and A.O. Hamid. 2008. Effect of malting on the chemical constituents, anti- nutrition factors, and ash composition of two sorghum cultivars (Feterita and Tabat). J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 4(5): 500-504.
Fuller, M.P., J.H. Hamza, H.Z. Rihan and M. Al-Issawi. 2012. Germination of primed seed under NaCl stress in wheat. Int. Sch. Res. Netw. Bot., 12: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/167804
Gama, P.B., S. Inanaga, K. Tanaka and R. Nakazawa. 2007. Physiological response of common-bean (Phaseolus Vulg. L.) seedlings to salinity stress. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 6(2): 79-88.
Ghafoor, A., M.A. Gill, A. Hassan, G. Murtaza and M. Qadir. 2001. Gypsum: An economical amendment for amelioration of saline-sodic waters and soils and for improving crop yields. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 3: 266-275.
Gul, B. and D.J. Weber. 1999. Effect of salinity, light, and temperature on germination in Allenrolfea occidentalis. Can. J. Bot., 77(2): 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1139/b98-204
Habib, N., A. Tahir and Q.U. Ain. 2013. Current situation and future outlook of sorghum area and production in Pakistan. Asian J. Agric. Rural Dev., 3(5): 283-289.
Hanay, A., F. Buyuksonmez, F.M. Kizilolu and M.Y. Canbolat. 2004. Reclamation of saline sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost. Compost Sci. Util., 12(2): 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2004.10702177
Idrees, S., M.S. Qureshi, M.Y. Ashraf, M. Hussain and N.H. Naveed. 2004. Influence of sulphate of potash (SOP) and farmyard manure (FYM) on sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) grown under salt stress. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci., 2(1): 65-69.
Iqbal, A., B. Sadia, A.I. Khan, F.S. Awan, R.A. Kainth and H.A. Sadaqat. 2010. Biodiversity in the sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) germplasm of Pakistan. Genet. Mol. Res., 9(2): 756-764. https://doi.org/10.4238/vol9-2gmr741
Iqbal, M., A. Hassan and M. Ibrahim. 2008. Effects of tillage systems and mulch on soil physical quality parameters and maize (Zea mays L.) yield in semi-arid Pakistan. Biol. Agric. Hortic., 25(4): 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2008.9755058
Khan, M.H. and S.K. Panda. 2008. Alterations in root lipid peroxidation and antioxidative responses in two rice cultivars under NaCl-salinity stress. Acta Physiol. Plant., 30: 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-007-0093-7
Kim, H., H. Jeong, J. Jeon and S. Bae. 2016. Effects of irrigation with saline water on crop growth and yield in greenhouse cultivation. Water, 8(4): 127-135. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040127
Mamo, M., J.F. Moncrief, C.J. Rosen and T.R. Halbach. 2000. Municipal solid waste compost application on soil water and water stress in irrigated corn. Compost Sci. Util., 8(3): 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2000.10701996
Mansour, M.M., F.Z. Salama, M. Ali and A.F. Abou-Hadid. 2005. Cell and plant responses to NaCl in Zea mays L. cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Gen. Appl. Plant Physiol., 31(1-2): 29-41.
Mashali, A.M. 1995. Integrated soil management for sustainable use of salt affected soils and network activities. Int. Workshop Integ. Soil Manage. Sustainable Use Salt Affected Soils. Philippines: November. 610: 29-38.
Mehmood, S., A. Bashir, A. Ahmad, Z. Akram, N. Jabeen and M. Gulfraz. 2008. Molecular characterization of regional Sorghum bicolor varieties from Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 40(5): 2015-2021.
Mirza, B.B., M.S. Zia, N. Szombathova and A. Zaujec. 2005. Rehabilitation of soils through environmental friendly technologies: role of sesbania and farm yard manure. Agric. Trop. Subtrop., 38(1): 17-22.
Patel, R.M., S.O. Prasher and R.B. Bonnell. 2000. Effects of water table depth, irrigation water salinity and fertilizer application on root zone salt buildup. Can. Agric. Eng., 42(3): 111-115.
Plaut, Z., M. Edelstein and M. Ben-Hur. 2013. Overcoming salinity barriers to crop production using traditional methods. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 32(4): 250-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2012.752236
Rao, P.P., P.S. Birthal, B.V. Reddy, K.N. Rai and S. Ramesh. 2006. Diagnostics of sorghum and pearl millet grains-based nutrition in India. Int. Sorghum and Millets Newsl., 47: 93-96.
Reddy, B.V.S., S. Ramesh, P.S. Reddy and A.A. Kumar. 2009. Genetic enhancement for drought tolerance in sorghum. Plant Breed Rev., 31: 189-222. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470593783.ch3
Saini, A. 2012. Forage quality of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) as influenced by irrigation, nitrogen levels and harvesting stage. Indian J. Sci. Res., 3(2): 67-73.
Sarwar, G., H. Schmeisky, N. Hussain, S. Muhammad, M. Ibrahim and E. Safdar. 2008. Improvement of soil physical and chemical properties with compost application in rice-wheat cropping system. Pak. J. Bot., 40(1): 275-282.
Shaaban, M., M. Abid and R.A.I. Abou-Shanab. 2013. Amelioration of salt affected soils in rice paddy system by application of organic and inorganic amendments. Plant Soil Environ., 59(5): 227-233. https://doi.org/10.17221/881/2012-PSE
Sharif, M., M. Arif, T. Burni, F. Khan, B. Jan and I. Khan. 2014. Growth and phosphorus uptake of sorghum plants in salt affected soil as affected by organic materials composted with rock phosphate. Pak. J. Bot., 46(1): 173-180.
Steel, R.G., J.H. Torrie and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biological approach. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc. Book Co. NY, pp. 352-358.
U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. 1969. Diagnosis and Improvements of saline and alkali soils. Handbook No. 60. USDA. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.
Wahid, A., S. Akhtar, I. Ali and E. Rasul. 2015. Amelioration of saline-sodic soils with organic matter and their use for wheat growth. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 29(15-16): 2307-2318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629809370112
Zeng, L. and M.C. Shannon. 2000. Salinity effects on seedling growth and yield components of rice. Crop Sci. Soc. Am., 40(4): 996-1003. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.404996x
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?