Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Hydrolyzed Chicken Feather Meal as Protein Source for Red Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) Aquafeeds

PJZ_51_4_1489-1496

 

 

Hydrolyzed Chicken Feather Meal as Protein Source for Red Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) Aquafeeds

Nursinatrio and Rudy Agung Nugroho*

Animal Physiology, Development and Molecular Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University, Indonesia

ABSTRACT

An 84-day feeding trial was conducted to determine the effects of Hydrolyzed Chicken Feather Meal (HCFM) supplementation on the growth, feed efficiency, survival rate and carcass composition of red tilapia (Oreochromis sp). A group of red tilapias (initial weight 24.09 ± 0.05 g) were fed 3, 6, 9 and 12% HCFM as a supplement and compared to a control group without supplementation. After 84 days, growth parameters such as body weight gain (BWG), average weekly gain (AWG), daily weight gain (DWG), specific growth rate (SGR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), feed efficiency (FE), protein efficiency ratio (PER), survival rate (SR) and carcass proximate of red tilapia were measured. The results showed that HCFM up to 12% could be used as supplementation and showed positive effects on all growth parameters. Supplementation of HCFM above 6% in the red tilapia diet increased the protein and fat content of red tilapia’s carcass. The highest survival was found on red tilapia fed 9% HCFM supplementation in the diet. The current study also found that supplementation of HCFM in the diet is possible for red tilapia without impairing growth, feed intake, survival rate or carcass composition. Altogether, the results suggest that HCFM is an optional ingredient which can be used as an alternative for fish meal in aquafeed for red tilapia.


Article Information

Received 03 March 2018

Revised 22 May 2018

Accepted 20 July 2018

Available online 15 May 2019

Authors’ Contribution

N surveyed the location and collected the data. N and RAN analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Key words

Hydrolyzed chicken feather meal, Growth parameters, Oreochromis sp., Carcass composition, Survival rate.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.4.1489.1496

* Corresponding author: rudyagung.nugroho@fmipa.unmul.ac.id

0030-9923/2019/0004-1489 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2019 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Introduction

Fish meal (FM) plays an important role as an ingredient for fish feed (Caruso, 2015) and is known as a prime protein source of high quality and is a very digestible feed ingredient (Miles and Chapman, 2006; Tantikitti et al., 2016). Approximately 30% of total fish caught are converted to FM and fish oil (Barroso et al., 2014). However, there is a limitation in the production of FM due to an increasing price of this source (FAO, 2010; García-Romero et al., 2014; Kurbanov et al., 2015). Although FM is still a favourite among fish farmers, the search for potential alternative ingredients has become a well-recognized priority for sustainable development of the aquaculture industry. The use of poultry to replace FM that is often scarce, expensive, of limited availability, and which leads to high fish production costs provides an alternative approach and has been gaining momentum.

Replacing FM with cheaper ingredients such as chicken feather meal is a priority for nutrition research. Chicken feather is waste from slaughterhouses that has been found to have considerable economic potential to replace FM. Chicken feathers can be used for animal feed because they have high protein content, which comprises 80–90% dry matter and exceeds the raw protein content of soybean meal (42.5%) and fish meal (66.5%). Moreover, proximate analysis of chicken feathers found the following compositions: crude lipid (0.83%), crude fiber (2.15%), crude protein (82.36%), ash (1.49%), NFE (1.02%) and moisture content (12.33%) whereas ultimate analyses resulted in carbon (64.47%), nitrogen (10.41%), oxygen (22.34%) and sulphur (2.64%) (Tesfaye et al., 2017). However, chicken feather meal only has the digestibility of dry and organic matter in vitro, respectively at 5.8% and 0.7% because it has a fiber-shaped protein type (fibrous protein). Thus, chicken feathers must be hydrolyzed to improve digestibility (Bureau et al., 1999) and can be used as a protein source in fish diets such as red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). Previous research noted that the used of poultry by product has been conducted in some fish research such as Koi fish, Anabas testudines (Bloch) (Bhaskar et al., 2015), golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) (Wang et al., 2017) and juveniles of European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) (Campos et al., 2017). However, there has been limited research on the effects of dietary HCFM as a protein source on the growth, survival and feed efficiency of red tilapia.

Tilapia are generally placed as the second most commonly used aquaculture fish in the world (Fitzsimmons, 2010) and reached more than 5,000,000 metric tons of global production in 2016 (Fitzsimmons, 2016). As one of the important species in Indonesia aquaculture, the production of tilapia has also increased gradually in some Indonesian regions such as South Sumatera, West Java and East Kalimantan (Widiarti, 2015). Meanwhile, red tilapia are one of the most popular freshwater and economically important food fish, and have high protein levels (Nakphet et al., 2017; Pauly and Zeller, 2017; Roslan et al., 2014). Red tilapia can be cultivated with several advantages such as rapid growth, ease of breeding and resistance to pests and diseases as well as being able to adapt to environmental changes; they are popular for both local and export markets. The production of red tilapia can be accelerated by providing feed containing high quality nutrients in accordance with the requirements of fish to increase growth in shorter time periods.

To evaluate growth performance and health of fish, various physiological tools such as body weight gain (BWG), average weekly gain (AWG), daily weight gain (DWG), specific growth rate (SGR) (Nur et al., 2017; Yusup and Nugroho, 2017), feed conversion ratio (FCR) (Fum et al., 2017), feed efficiency (FE) (Moutinho et al., 2017), protein efficiency ratio (PER) (Azaza et al., 2015), survival rate (Cai et al., 2015) and carcass proximate (Aryani et al., 2017) have been successfully used. Thus, the current study was designed to evaluate the effects of dietary HCFM as a protein source on the growth, feed efficiency, survival rate and carcass composition of red tilapia.

 

Materials and Methods

Animals and experimental setup

Three-month-old red tilapia (n=900) (average initial weight 24.09 ± 0.05 g) were provided from local fish breeding sources in Cirata, Cianjur West Java (Indonesia) and acclimated at PT Suri Tani Pemuka, Cianjur West Java, Indonesia for one week. The fish were then randomly distributed into five experimental groups, namely control and four diets supplied with 3, 6, 9 and 12% of HCFM. Each experimental group was in triplicate with 50 fish per replicate being 15 experimental pond cages. These cages were randomly assigned to each group dietary treatment. The daily feed was divided into five parts (8, 10, 12 am, 2 and 4 pm) by using at satiation method. The fish were fed until apparent satiation and the feeding experiment lasted for 84 days. To quantify the exact feed intake, refused feed was siphoned out immediately, dried and weighed. Temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured daily with a routine thermometer, an HM-7 pH meter (pH 110, Eutech Instrument Cyberscan, Thermo Scientific, Illinois, USA) and a DO meter (YSI 550A Clandon, Ohio, USA). Nitrate, nitrite and ammonium were measured and recorded weekly using chemical test kits (Rochelle Salt Solution and Nessler Reagent, HACH, Loveland, Colorado, USA).

Diet preparation

All raw materials for control and test diets were prepared, weighed and mixed with a Getra mixer (B20-F volume 20 L Series R10240, China). A pelleting machine was used to obtain wet strands that were of 3 mm diameter. Both control and test diets were dried in an oven (30ºC), allowed to cool at room temperature, and stored at 27ºC throughout the experimental period. Determination of feed composition proximate analysis including dry matter, crude protein, crude fat and ash was performed. The compositions of the control and test diets are shown in Table I.

 

Table I.- Ingredient and proximate composition of control and trial diets.

Ingredients

Types of diet with hydrolyzed feathers meal inclusion

Control

3%

6%

9%

12%

Corn

26.00

23.00

20.00

17.00

14.00

Wheat by product

18.01

18.00

18.00

18.00

18.00

Soybean meal

17.64

18.31

18.65

19.00

20.20

Sunflower meal

5.30

5.30

5.30

5.30

5.30

Cassava starch

7.20

7.20

7.20

7.20

7.20

HCFM

0.00

3.00

6.00

9.00

12.00

Animal protein*

18.00

17.34

17.03

16.71

15.41

Fish meal

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

Mix oil

1.75

1.72

1.66

1.60

1.66

Vitamin mix

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

Proximate composition (%)

Dry matter

90.8

91.6

91.4

91.8

90.9

Crude protein

35.5

36.0

36.7

37.4

37.4

Crude fat

5.1

5.2

5.0

4.8

4.6

Ash

11.1

9.5

9.3

9.3

9.4

*Animal protein: Bone meal and blood meal.

 

Sampling and analytical procedure

Body weights (BW) of fish from each tank were recorded at weeks 4, 8 and 12 of the experiment. At the end of the experiment, BWG, AWG, DWG, SGR (Nur et al., 2017; Yusup and Nugroho, 2017), FCR (Fum et al., 2017), FE (Moutinho et al., 2017), PER (Azaza et al., 2015) and SR (Cai et al., 2015) were measured.

Proximate analysis

To calculated carcass composition, fish was transformed into meal for a proximate standard test (AOAC, 2005) by using a chemical test and NIRS automatic machine. Fish were measured for protein and fat contents.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Proximate analysis and growth data were objected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (SPSS, Inc., USA). Comparisons among treatment means were carried out by one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s test. Standard Error (±SE) was calculated to identify the range of means. Percentage data were transformed by arc-sine transformation prior to ANOVA and reversed afterwards. All significant tests were at P<0.05 levels.

 

Results

Growth, feed efficiency and survival rate

After 84 days of feeding trial, the BWG and AWG of red tilapia fed dietary 12% of HCFM supplementation were significantly higher (P<0.05) than red tilapia fed other diets. The red tilapia fed dietary HCFM inclusion above 3% also had significantly higher DWG than control diet. Meanwhile, SGR, FCR, FE and PER were not affected by the supplementation of HCFM in the diet of red tilapia (Table II). At the end of feeding trial, the lowest survival rate was found for red tilapia fed with 12% of HCFM inclusion whereas the highest survival rate was shown for the red tilapia fed control and 9% HCFM supplementation in the diet (Fig. 1).


 

Table II.- Growth performance of red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) with different concentration of hydrolyzed feathers meal.

Parameters

Hydrolyzed feathers meal inclusion

Control

3%

6%

9%

12%

BWG (g/fish)

77.56 ± 0.52a

64.43 ± 0.17b

80.93 ± 0.20c

83.96 ± 0.87c

84.20 ± 0.73d

AWG (g/fish)

6.46 ± 0.44a

5.36 ± 0.89b

6.74 ± 0.16a

6.99 ± 0.72a

7.01 ± 0.60c

DWG (g/fish)

0.92 ± 0.06a

0.76 ± 0.12b

0.96 ± 0.02c

0.99 ± 0.10c

1.00 ± 0.08c

SGR (%/day)

1.70 ± 0.13

1.53 ± 0.31

1.71 ± 0.04

1.78 ± 0.20

1.78 ± 0.17

FCR

1.74 ± 0.04

2.07 ± 0.15

1.86 ± 0.09

1.91 ± 0.16

1.75 ± 0.08

FE (%)

57.64 ± 1.54

48.43 ± 3.44

53.90 ± 2.83

53.24 ± 4.96

57.30 ± 2.86

PER

1.62 ± 0.04

1.35 ± 0.09

1.47 ± 0.07

1.42 ± 0.12

1.53 ± 0.07

Values are Means ± Standar error. Means in the same row having different superscript letters (a, b, c) indicated significant differences (P<0.05). BWG, body weight gain; AWG, average weight gain; DWG, daily weight gain; SGR, specific growth rate; FCR, feed conversion ratio; FE, feed efficiency, PER, protein efficiency ratio; SR, survival rate.

 

Table III.- Proximate analysis of hydrolyzed feathers meal of fish.

Parameters (%)

Hydrolyzed feathers meal inclusion

Control

3%

6%

9%

12%

Crude protein

48.50 ± 0.25a

49.59 ± 0.05a

51.32 ± 0.12b

51.40 ± 0.03b

51.93 ± 0.27c

Crude fat

20.84 ± 0.15a

19.67 ± 0.18a

21.40 ± 0.22b

21.56 ± 0.21b

23.00 ± 0.11c

 

Fish carcass composition

Table III shows carcass compositions (%/100 g wet weight basis) of the red tilapia at the five levels of HCFM supplementation after the 84-day experimental period. Crude protein and crude fat of red tilapia fed 12% HCFM supplementation showed a high percentage after this 84-day period.

Water quality parameter

Water quality parameters were recorded during the experiments along with their tolerable limits (Table IV). Average temperature, pH, DO, nitrite and TAN for this research were found to be at the tolerable limit.

 

Table IV.- Water quality parameters.

Parameters

Mean± SE

Tolerable limits

Temperature (o C)

22.13 ± 0.17

20.9 – 24.3

pH

7.35 ± 0.25

6.5 – 9.0

DO (ppm)

5.70 ± 0.31

3-12

Nitrite (ppm)

0.17 ± 0.07

0.5

TAN (ppm)

0.14 ± 0.02

0.5

 

Discussion

Growth performance

Positive effects of growth of red tilapia were observed when fish were fed 12% HCFM in the diet. The body weight of red tilapia also increased with the increasing level of HCFM. According to Grazziotin et al. (2008), Moritz and Latshaw (2001) and Wiradimadja et al. (2014), chicken feathers contain keratin proteins that have low digestibility. However, hydrolysis can increase digestibility to 54–76%. Further, the absorption of nutrients becomes more optimal when consumed at high concentrations. This suggests that the use of HCFM as a protein source in aquafeeds could replace some other animal protein sources with the same result. This study also found that the 12% of HCFM supply in the diet of red tilapia for 84 days resulted in higher BWG (84.20 ± 0.73 g/fish), AWG (7.01 ± 0.60 g/fish) and DWG (1.00 ± 0.08 g/fish) than the control group. This finding is similar to previous research revealing that replacement of fish meal by using poultry also increased fish growth parameters such as in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (Yones and Metwalli, 2016), juveniles of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Barreto-Curiel et al., 2016) and Japanese sea bass (Lateolabrax japonicus) (Wang et al., 2015). Another current study, however, mentioned that poultry used as an FM replacement in the diet of juvenile Black Sea Bass Centropristis striata from 40–90% led to no significant differences in BWG (Dawson et al., 2018). Similarly, no effects on growth performance were found in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed diets with poultry meal and blood meal in combination with poultry oil (Hatlen et al., 2015; Aryani et al., 2017).

It is assumed that the amount of protein contained in the feed that can be digested was sufficient to support fish growth. Growth may stop and a decrease in body weight can occur if protein is deficient. Further, protein in the body system can be broken down to maintain more critical functions such as the immune system (Magnadóttir, 2006; Uribe et al., 2011). In addition to protein metabolism, low fish growth rates can occur due to the amount and characteristics of keratin protein contained in feather meals, and only a small amount of protein can be absorbed by the body. Moreover, keratin proteins have a strong double bond that inhibits breakdown by proteolytic enzymes in the digestive tract (Montes-Zarazúa et al., 2015; Sinkiewicz et al., 2017). Growth values exceeding 1% indicate that the amount of protein contained in the feed and digested by the fish is sufficient, providing a balance of essential amino acids in the diet. In addition, specific growth rate is also affected by the balance of nutrients in the diet that can be digested by fish, particularly the amino acid content. These results also indicate that the use of HCFM up to 12% is still acceptable by red tilapia.

Current findings also found that SGR, FCR, FE and PER of red tilapia fed any level of HCFM were not significantly different to the control. These findings showed that a supply with 3–12% of HCFM in the diet of red tilapia can be applied with no adverse effects on fish growth. This result is in accordance with previous research noting that replacing FM with other soy protein (33–100%) led to no significant difference in growth performance or nutrient utilization of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Kaushik et al., 1995). Moreover, protein efficiency is influenced by several factors including fish size, physiological functions of fish, feed quality and feeding rate. High PER values also indicate a good feed quality (Cho, 1992; Council, 2011; De Silva and Anderson, 1994). In addition, HCFM inclusion in the diet up to 12% reflects that the quality of this ingredient can match the value of the feed using animal protein meal, which is beneficial because animal protein generally has high prices and materials that compete with human needs.

Survival

Although 12% HCFM inclusion reduced survival of red tilapia to 92%, this survival rate was at an acceptable level. This result is similar to past research finding that substituted fish meal using another source of protein in the diet of Clarias gariepinus fingerlings (Djissou et al., 2016) led to a high survival rate above 90% or similar survival rate with control (100%) with respect to juvenile Ussuri catfish Pseudobagrus ussuriensis (Bu et al., 2017). In contrast, study replacement fish meal with soya protein concentrate on snakehead (Channa striata) showed lower survival rates compared to control (Hien et al., 2017). In addition, a previous study on the use of fermented feather meal as a fish meal replacement on the survival of Oreochromis niloticus revealed that the survival of the fish was not affected by any concentration of fermented feather meal substitution (Arunlertaree and Moolthongnoi, 2008). Hence, complete nutrition in the feed provides energy for the activity and survival of fish. The quality of feed is determined by its nutrient content because fish utilize the feed to obtain energy in accordance with their needs.

Diet composition

Diets were formulated to be optimal for growth and survival of red tilapia by inclusion of HCFM up to 12%, with no significant negative effects on fish growth performance and survival rate. The inclusion of HCFM might decrease diet costs, which explains the lower values of cost for per-kg fish production. The present study revealed that diet composition with HCFM inclusion had higher protein, low fat and ash content than a diet without HCFM substitution. The higher protein in the diet supports and affects fish weight. Meanwhile, freshwater fish such as red tilapia often require fatty acids such as 18 carbon n-3 fatty acid and linolenic acid (18:3-n-3), in quantities ranging from 0.5 to 1.5% of dry diet (Craig and Helfrich, 2009). As a comparison, previous research suggests that hybrid tilapia needs 5% crude fat for minimum growth and can be increased until 12% of crude fat for maximum growth (Chou and Shiau, 1996). Further, ash is the result of combustion of organic materials in the form of minerals and the lower ash content indicates that the feed is more easily digested by the fish.

Fish carcass composition

Generally, tilapia has a protein content of approximately 19.04% and a fat content of 19.67–23.00% (Foh et al., 2011). The current results determined that red tilapia fed 12% HCFM supplementation in the diet had the highest protein (51.93%) and fat (23.00%) contents. This finding is similar to previous research stating that tilapia fed with 20% fish meal substitution had significantly higher total protein in their muscle compared to tilapia fed commercial feeds. In addition, Oreochromis niloticus fed 20% fish meal substitution had also minimum lipid content (Al-Ghanim et al., 2017). In contrast, another study revealed no significant effects on crude protein and fat of Juvenile tilapia fed poultry instead of fish meal (Yones and Metwalli, 2016). The present results also suggested that the protein content in the HCFM can be applied to increase the protein content in fish carcass, in comparison with red tilapia fed without inclusion of HCFM.

Water quality

The quality of water plays a pivotal role in the growth of fish. These water parameters (temperature, pH, DO, nitrite and TAN) remained within the suitable range required for red tilapia (Alabaster and Lloyd, 1980; Hepher et al., 1983), and there were only minor differences among the treatments. The average water temperature recorded during the experiment was 22.13± 0.17 oC, which is in a tolerable limit for red tilapia (20.9–24.3oC); pH was in a tolerable range (7.35± 0.25), the DO levels recorded during the experiment were 5.70± 0.31 ppm and TAN was at an acceptable level (0.14± 0.02 ppm) that supports the life of the red tilapia. Overall, water quality parameters such as temperature, pH, DO, nitrite and TAN were found to be favourable for fish growth and survival during the trial.

 

Conclusion

Based on growth, feed efficiency, survival rate and carcass composition, the use of hydrolyzed chicken feather meal up to 12 % is possible for red tilapia aquafeed without impairing growth and feed intake. The carcass composition (crude protein and crude lipid) of red tilapia was recorded to be highest at 6% of HCFM inclusion. Further research should be conducted to determine the effects of prolonged feeding with current ingredients at high concentration.

 

Acknowledgment

The author(s) gratefully thank the Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University, Indonesia; Mr Erwin Suwendi and Ai Tety Nurbety from PT Suri Tani Pemuka, the Aquaculture division research and development, and Japfa Comfeed Indonesia for technical and facilities in support of the research.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

 

References

Al-Ghanim, K., Al-Thobaiti, A., Al-Balawi, H.F.A., Ahmed, Z. and Mahboob, S., 2017. Effects of replacement of fishmeal with other alternative plant sources in the feed on proximate composition of muscle, liver and ovary in tilapia (Oreochromis nioloticus). Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 60: e17160376. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2017160376

Alabaster, J., and Lloyd, R., 1980. Dissolved oxygen: Water quality criteria for fresh-water fish. Butterworth’s, London, pp. 127-143.

AOAC, 2005. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Benjamin Franklin Station, Washington.

Aryani, N., Mardiah, A. and Syandri, H., 2017. Influence of feeding rate on the growth, feed efficiency and carcass composition of the giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy). Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 1775-1781. http://doi.org/10.17582/journal. pjz/2017.49.5.1775.1781

Arunlertaree, C. and Moolthongnoi, C., 2008. The use of fermented feather meal for replacement fish meal in the diet of Oreochromis niloticus. Environ. Nat. Resour. J., 6: 13-24.

Aryani, N., Mardiah, A. and Syandri, H., 2017. Influence of feeding rate on the growth, feed efficiency and carcass composition of the giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy). Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 1775-1781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.5.1775.1781

Azaza, M.S., Khiari, N., Dhraief, M.N., Aloui, N., Kraϊem, M.M. and Elfeki, A., 2015. Growth performance, oxidative stress indices and hepatic carbohydrate metabolic enzymes activities of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L., in response to dietary starch to protein ratios. Aquacul. Res., 46: 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12153

Barreto-Curiel, F., Parés-Sierra, G., Correa-Reyes, G., Durazo-Beltrán, E. and Viana, M.T., 2016. Total and partial fishmeal substitution by poultry by-product meal (petfood grade) and enrichment with acid fish silage in aquafeeds for juveniles of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Lat. Am. J. aquat. Res., 44: 327-335. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol44-issue2-fulltext-13

Barroso, F.G., de Haro, C., Sánchez-Muros, M.J., Venegas, E., Martínez-Sánchez, A. and Pérez-Bañón, C., 2014. The potential of various insect species for use as food for fish. Aquaculture, 422–423: 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.12.024

Bhaskar, P., Pyne, S.K. and Ray, A.K., 2015. Growth performance study of Koi fish, Anabas testudineus (Bloch) by utilization of poultry viscera, as a potential fish feed ingredient, replacing fishmeal. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric., 4: 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-014-0082-y

Bu, X., Chen, A., Lian, X., Chen, F., Zhang, Y., Muhammad, I., Ge, X. and Yang, Y., 2017. An evaluation of replacing fish meal with cottonseed meal in the diet of juvenile Ussuri catfish Pseudobagrus ussuriensis: Growth, antioxidant capacity, nonspecific immunity and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture, 479: 829-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.07.032

Bureau, D., Harris, A. and Cho, C., 1999. Apparent digestibility of rendered animal protein ingredients for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture, 180: 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00210-0

Cai, Z., Li, W., Mai, K., Xu, W., Zhang, Y. and Ai, Q., 2015. Effects of dietary size-fractionated fish hydrolysates on growth, activities of digestive enzymes and aminotransferases and expression of some protein metabolism related genes in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) larvae. Aquaculture, 440: 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.01.026

Campos, I., Matos, E., Marques, A. and Valente, L.M.P., 2017. Hydrolyzed feather meal as a partial fishmeal replacement in diets for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles. Aquaculture, 476: 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.04.024

Caruso, G., 2015. Use of plant products as candidate fish meal substitutes: An emerging issue in aquaculture productions. Fish. Aquacul. J., 6: e123. https://doi.org/10.4172/2150-3508.1000e123

Cho, C.Y., 1992. Feeding systems for rainbow trout and other salmonids with reference to current estimates of energy and protein requirements. Aquaculture, 100: 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(92)90353-M

Chou, B.S. and Shiau, S.Y., 1996. Optimal dietary lipid level for growth of juvenile hybrid tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus x Oreochromis aureus. Aquaculture, 143: 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(96)01266-5

Council, N.R., 2011. Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. National Academies Press, Washington DC, United States.

Craig, S. and Helfrich, L.A., 2009. Understanding fish nutrition, feeds, and feeding. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Virginia State University, Petersburg.

Dawson, M.R., Alam, M.S., Watanabe, W.O., Carroll, P.M. and Seaton, P.J., 2018. Evaluation of poultry by-product meal as an alternative to fish meal in the diet of juvenile black sea bass reared in a recirculating aquaculture system. N. Am. J. Aquacul., 80: 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/naaq.10009

De Silva, S.S. and Anderson, T.A., 1994. Fish nutrition in aquaculture. Springer Science & Business Media.

Djissou, A.S.M., Adjahouinou, D.C., Koshio, S. and Fiogbe, E.D., 2016. Complete replacement of fish meal by other animal protein sources on growth performance of Clarias gariepinus fingerlings. Int. aquat. Res., 8: 333-341.

FAO, 2010. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2008. Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

Fitzsimmons, K., 2010. Potential to increase global tilapia production. Global outlook for Aquaculture Leadership, Kuala Lumpur.

Fitzsimmons, K., 2016. Supply and demand in global tilapia market 2015. World Aquaculture Society, Las Vegas.

Foh, M., Kamara, M., Amadou, I., Foh, B. and Wenshui, X., 2011. Chemical and physicochemical properties of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fish protein hydrolysate and concentrate. Int. J. biol. Chem., 5: 21-36. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijbc.2011.21.36

Fum, K.Y., Shapawi, R. and Lim, L.S., 2017. Fish by-product meal served as a good protein source in the formulated diets for red tilapia fry. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 39: 813-817.

García-Romero, J., Ginés, R., Izquierdo, M.S., Haroun, R., Badilla, R. and Robaina, L., 2014. Effect of dietary substitution of fish meal for marine crab and echinoderm meals on growth performance, ammonia excretion, skin colour, and flesh quality and oxidation of red porgy (Pagrus pagrus). Aquaculture, 422–423: 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.11.024

Grazziotin, A., Pimentel, F.A., De Jong, E.V. and Brandelli, A., 2008. Poultry feather hydrolysate as a protein source for growing rats. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci., 45: 61-67. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1413-95962008000700008

Hatlen, B., Jakobsen, J.V., Crampton, V., Alm, M., Langmyhr, E., Espe, M., Hevrøy, E., Torstensen, B., Liland, N. and Waagbø, R., 2015. Growth, feed utilization and endocrine responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed diets added poultry by-product meal and blood meal in combination with poultry oil. Aquacul. Nutr., 21: 714-725. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12194

Hepher, B., Liao, I.C., Cheng, S.H. and Hsieh, C.S., 1983. Food utilization by red tilapia - Effects of diet composition, feeding level and temperature on utilization efficiencies for maintenance and growth. Aquaculture, 32: 255-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90223-5

Hien, T.T.T., Phu, T.M., Tu, T.L.C., Tien, N.V., Duc, P.M. and Bengtson, D.A., 2017. Effects of replacing fish meal with soya protein concentrate on growth, feed efficiency and digestibility in diets for snakehead, Channa striata. Aquacul. Res., 48: 3174-3181. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13147

Kaushik, S.J., Cravedi, J.P., Lalles, J.P., Sumpter, J., Fauconneau, B. and Laroche, M., 1995. Partial or total replacement of fish meal by soybean protein on growth, protein utilization, potential estrogenic or antigenic effects, cholesterolemia and flesh quality in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture, 133: 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00403-B

Kurbanov, A.R., Milusheva, R.Y., Rashidova, S.S. and Kamilov, B.G., 2015. Effect of replacement of fish meal with silkworm (Bombyx mori) pupa protein on the growth of Clarias gariepinus fingerling. Int. J. Fish. aquat. Stud., 2: 25-27.

Magnadóttir, B., 2006. Innate immunity of fish (overview). Fish Shellf. Immunol., 20: 137-151.

Miles, R. and Chapman, F., 2006. The benefits of fish meal in aquaculture diets 1. IFAS Extension, The University of Florida, pp. 1-6.

Montes-Zarazúa, E., Colín-Cruz, A., Pérez-Rea, M.L., de Icaza, M., Velasco-Santos, C. and Martínez-Hernández, A.L., 2015. Effect of keratin structures from chicken feathers on expansive soil remediation. Adv. Mater Sci. Engin., 2015: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/907567

Moritz, J. and Latshaw, J., 2001. Indicators of nutritional value of hydrolyzed feather meal. Poult. Sci., 80: 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.1.79

Moutinho, S., Martínez-Llorens, S., Tomás-Vidal, A., Jover-Cerdá, M., Oliva-Teles, A. and Peres, H., 2017. Meat and bone meal as partial replacement for fish meal in diets for gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) juveniles: Growth, feed efficiency, amino acid utilization, and economic efficiency. Aquaculture, 468: 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.10.024

Nakphet, S., Ritchie, R.J. and Kiriratnikom, S., 2017. Aquatic plants for bioremediation in red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus × Oreochromis mossambicus) recirculating aquaculture. Aquacul. Int., 25: 619-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0060-7

Nur, F.M., Nugroho, R.A. and Fachmy, S., 2017. Effects of propolis (Trigona sp.) extract supplementation on the growth and blood profile of Pangasius djambal. AIP Conference Proceedings, pp 20-24.

Pauly, D. and Zeller, D., 2017. Comments on FAOs state of world fisheries and aquaculture (SOFIA 2016). Mar. Policy, 77: 176-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.006

Roslan, J., Yunos, K.F.M. Abdullah, N. and Kamal, S.M.M., 2014. Characterization of fish protein hydrolysate from tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by-product. Agric. agric. Sci. Procedia, 2: 312-319.

Sinkiewicz, I., Śliwińska, A. Staroszczyk, H. and Kołodziejska, I., 2017. Alternative methods of preparation of soluble keratin from chicken feathers. Waste Biomass Valori, 8: 1043-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9678-y

Tantikitti, C., Chookird, D. and Phongdara, A., 2016. Effects of fishmeal quality on growth performance, protein digestibility and trypsin gene expression in pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 38: 73-82.

Tesfaye, T., Sithole, B. Ramjugernath, D. and Chunilall, V., 2017. Valorisation of chicken feathers: Characterisation of chemical properties. Waste Manage. N.Y., 68: 626-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.050

Uribe, C., Folch, H. Enriquez, R. and Moran, G., 2011. Innate and adaptive immunity in teleost fish: A review. Vet. Med. Czech, 56: 486-503. https://doi.org/10.17221/3294-VETMED

Wang, Y., Ma, X.Z., Wang, F., Wu, Y.B., Qin, J.G. and Li, P., 2017. Supplementations of poultry by-product meal and selenium yeast increase fish meal replacement by soybean meal in golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) diet. Aquacul. Res., 48: 1904-1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13028

Wang, Y., Wang, F., Ji, W.X., Han, H. and Li, P., 2015. Optimizing dietary protein sources for Japanese sea bass (Lateolabrax japonicus) with an emphasis on using poultry by-product meal to substitute fish meal. Aquacul. Res., 46: 874-883. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12242

Widiarti, A., 2015. Indonesia tilapia production and trade. In: Infofish tilapia. Ministry of Marine Afffairs and Fisheries, Kualalumpur, Republic of Indonesia.

Wiradimadja, R., Rusmana, D., Widjastuti, T. and Mushawwir, A., 2014. Chicken slaughterhouse waste utilization (chicken feather meal treated) as a source of protein animal feed ingredients in broiler chickens. Lucr. Stiint. Ser. Zooteh., 62: 120-124.

Yones, A. and Metwalli, A., 2016. Effects of fish meal substitution with poultry by-product meal on growth performance, nutrients utilization and blood contents of juvenile nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J. Aquacul. Res. Dev., 7: 1-6.

Yusup, C.H.M. and Nugroho, R.A., 2017. Effects of copra (Cocos nucifera) meal on the growth performance of Cyprinus carpio. AIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 20-25.

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Vol. 51, Iss. 5, Pages 1599-1997

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe