Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Effect of Di-n-butyl Pthalate on Oxidative Stress Parameters in Liver and Gills of Labeo rohita

PJZ_51_4_1595-1598

 

 

Effect of Di-n-butyl Pthalate on Oxidative Stress Parameters in Liver and Gills of Labeo rohita

Iqra Jaffar, Zainab Sehzadi, Muhammad Adeel, Khalid P. Lone and Mehwish Faheem*

Department of Zoology, Government College University, Lahore

ABSTRACT

Phthalates are plasticizers, released from different sources, are ubiquitous in the aquatic environment. In the present study, freshwater fish (Labeo rohita) juveniles were exposed to low concentrations (10μg/l and 100μg/l) of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) for 7 days to evaluate oxidative stress in liver and gills by analyzing activity of glutathione-S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), glutathione (GSH) and by measuring lipid peroxidation (LPO). Catalase activity increased significantly in liver and gills of fish exposed to 10μg/l of DBP. Level of GSH and LPO increased significantly in gills while a non-significant decrease was recorded for GSH and GST in liver. These results showed that exposure to low concentrations of di-n-butyl phthalate are capable of inducing oxidative stress in vital organs of fish that may cause detrimental effects on the fish health.


Article Information

Received 26 September 2018

Revised 12 December 2018

Accepted 27 January 2019

Available online 30 May 2019

Authors’ Contributions

IJ, ZS and MA performed the experiments and analyze data under supervision of KPL and MF. MF wrote the manuscript.

Key words

Oxidative stress, Dibutyl phthalate, Labeo rohita.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.4.sc6

* Corresponding author: mehwishfaheem@gcu.edu.pk

0030-9923/2019/0004-1598 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2019 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Phthalates are esters of phthalic acid and are involved in the production of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyvinyl acetates, polyurethanes (Xu et al., 2013). Some phthalates, like diethyl hexyl phthalate (DEHP) and benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), are used for adding flexibility to the plastics, packaging of food material and manufacturing of medical tubing while diethyl phthalate (DEP) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) are also used as solvents in insecticides and cosmetics and in personal care product (Ferguson et al., 2011). Due to their high use in various products, phthalates are produced in high amount and are ubiquitous in our environment.

Oxidative stress can be defined as the imbalance between production of reactive oxygen species (ROS; free radical) and antioxidant defense. Oxidative stress results in deregulation of cellular functions and lead to pathological conditions (Bandyopadhyay et al., 1999).

ROS readily react with proteins, nucleic acid, carbohydrate and lipids present in cellular components and result in their impaired structure and function. Unsaturated fatty acids present in the cell membranes are attacked by ROS and results in lipid peroxidation. Estimation of LPO with thiobarbituric reactive oxygen species (TBARS) is a reliable and most widely used method (de Zwart et al., 1999). Antioxidant enzymes i.e. catalase, SOD, GST and free radical scavengers like GSH are responsible for the protection of cell and tissues from the toxic effects of these ROS (Banerjee et al., 1999; Valko et al., 2007). Therefore, antioxidant parameters and oxidative stress indices are considered potential biomarkers and are frequently used as screening tools to assess the impacts of environmental stress in biological system.

The Present study was designed to investigate whether a repeated 7-day exposure to low and realistic concentrations of DBP produces any signs of intoxication in fish. Labeo rohita is a commercially important fish of Pakistan and toxicity evaluation of DBP using this species is a first step to understand complete mechanism of action of DBP in L. rohita and will be helpful in future environmental monitoring and human health.

 

Materials and methods

Healthy L. rohita juveniles (56.48g±5.2 BW; 16.7±0.63 cm TL) were purchased from Manawan Fisheries Teaching and Research Institute Lahore. After acclimatization for 15 days, 30 fish were equally divided into six aquariums filled with total 60 L of water. Aquariums were randomly assigned control and treatment groups in replicates. Fish were given commercial carp feed from Oryza Organics twice a day during acclimatization and experimental period. Fish were healthy and pathogen free.

Fish were exposed to 10 µg/l and 100 µg/l of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide and diluted in aquarium water, for 7 days. Up to 60% of water was changed daily during the experiment and fresh toxicant was added daily. After 7 days, fish were collected and anesthetized using clove oil (5 ppm in water). Gills and liver were taken out, homogenized in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH=7.4) using glass homogenizer and centrifuged at 13000 rpm (30 min at 4oC) to get post mitochondrial supernatant (PMS). A portion of homogenate was used for estimation of lipid peroxidation according to Wright et al. (1981). Glutathione was quantified by method of Jollow et al. (1974) as described by Faheem and Lone (2017). Catalase (CAT) activity was measured according to Claiborne (1985) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity according to Habig et al. (1974). Protein content was estimated by using Bradford reagent as described by He (2011) with bovine serum albumin as standard. Data was analyzed using Garphpad Prism 7. One way analysis of varience (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s Post Hoc test was used to determine difference between means. Data was expressed as mean±S.E.M.

 

Results and discussion

Anthropogenic pollutants enter into aquatic ecosystem from land based sources (Tornero and Hanke, 2016). These pollutants have adverse effects on animal’s physiological system and also disturb their normal functions (Rhind, 2009). Pthalates are largely used in the production of plastics and a large amount of pthalates are released into aquatic ecosystem every year because of anthropometric activities that result in detrimental effects on fish health.

Free radicals can damage cell membrane by attacking the polyunsaturated fatty acid and form lipid peroxides thus leads to lipid peroxidation (LPO). Increase in lipid peroxidation after exposure to environmental contaminants has been reported in many studies (Qu et al., 2015; Faheem and Lone, 2017; Karataş 2018). Flounder exposed to low concentrations of DEP had increased level of LPO in liver and kidney tissues (Kang et al., 2010). Similarly, carp exposed to various concentrations of DEP resulted in increased hepatic lipid peroxidation (Zhang, 2014). In current study with L. rohita, the measured levels of lipid peroxidation expressed as concentration of thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) in liver and gill tissue are shown in Figure 1A. The 7-day exposure to DBP resulted


 

in increased lipid peroxidation, especially in animals exposed to 100 µg/l (462.822 nmol of TBARS formed/g of tissue vs. 1883.72 nmol of TBARS formed/g of tissue in liver; 177.835 nmol of TBARS formed/g of tissue vs. 1065.17nmol of TBARS formed/g of tissue in gills) (Fig. 1A).

GSH is one of the important tripeptide and undergo scavenging of reactive oxygen species (Srikanth et al., 2013). In present study, the reduced GSH content increased significantly in the gills (16.80 nmol GSH/g of tissue vs. 17.44 nmol GSH/g of tissue) while a non-significant decrease was observed in liver (6.01 nmol GSH/g of tissue vs. 3.34, 2.84 nmol GSH/g of tissue) following the 7-day exposure to DBP (Fig. 1B). Zhang (2014) reported that high concentrations of DEP resulted in significant decrease in GSH content in liver of carp. Nile tilapia exposed to DBP at concentration of 10 mg L−1 for 24 and 96 h, resulted in decreased content of gills GSH (Erkmen et al., 2015). This decrease may be due to the fact that fish were exposed to very high concentration of DBP which cause such decrease in level of GSH in gills, while low concentration as used in present study can increase the GSH content to cope with the damage caused by toxicant.

Catalase (CAT) is an antioxidant enzyme that can detoxify H2O2 into oxygen and water and is first line of defense against oxidative stress (Velisek et al., 2011). In current study, a significant increase was observed in catalase activity in fish liver (784.397 µmole H2O2/mint/mg of protein vs. 2398.85 µmole H2O2/mint/mg of protein) and gills (27.533 µmole H2O2/mint/mg of protein vs. 75.190 µmole H2O2/mint/mg of protein) in group exposed to 10 µg/l DBP after 7days. A non-significant decrease compared to control was observed for liver (784.397 µmole H2O2/mint/mg of protein vs. 662.254 µmole H2O2/mint/mg of protein) in group exposed to 100µg/l DBP (Fig. 1C). CAT activity increased to protect cell from damage as catalase is the first line of defense against oxidative stress (Harman, 2006). Mankidy et al. (2013) reported that fertilized eggs of fathead minnows exposed to 1mg/l DBP resulted in 14 fold more expression of CAT mRNA compared to the control. Similar increase in catalase activity was recorded in various fish species exposed to different toxicants (Stara et al., 2012; Abdel-Tawwab and Hamed, 2018). Zhao et al. (2014) reported that exposure of DBP to common carp caused decreased in catalase activity. This decrease may be due to the fact that fish were exposed to high concentration of DBP which cause decrease in activity whereas in our study very low concentrations were used.

GST enzyme can metabolize the harmful compounds by adding thiol group and making them more water soluble (Ashor et al., 2016). In our study, GST activity was not significantly changed compared to the respective negative control fish. However a non-significant decrease was observed in liver (1791.84 nmol CDNB conjugate/min/mg protein, 1490.07 nmol CDNB conjugate/min/mg protein vs. 1339.28nmol CDNB conjugate/min/mg protein). In case of gills, most of the measured values were within the limits of the control values (330.909 nmol CDNB conjugate/min/mg protein, 385.017 nmol CDNB conjugate/min/mg protein vs. 642.687nmol CDNB conjugate/min/mg protein) (Fig. 1D). Decreased GST activity after exposure of DBP and other related phthalates was reported in various studies (Kang et al., 2010; Zhang, 2014). On the other hand, Mankidy et al. (2013) reported that exposure of 1mg/l of DBP had no effect on mRNA level of GST.

 

Conclusion

Present study showed that exposure to low concentrations of DBP caused oxidative stress by altering activity of the antioxidant enzymes and enhancing lipid peroxidation in gills and liver tissue considering that these tissues are the main target of action of anthropogenic chemicals. Endpoints measured in the present study may accurately reflect the various imbalances that occur in a body following exposure of dibutyl phthalate and will be helpful in environmental monitoring using L. rohita and related species.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

References

Abdel-Tawwab, M. and Hamed, H.S., 2018. J. appl. Ichthyol., 34: 1117-1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13763

Ashor, A.W., Siervo, M. and Mathers, J.C., 2016. In: Molecular basis of nutrition and aging. Academic Press, pp. 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801816-3.00043-1

Bandyopadhyay, U., Das, D. and Banerjee, R.K., 1999. Curr. Sci., 77: 658-666.

Banerjee, B.D., Seth, V., Bhattacharya, A., Pasha, S.T. and Chakraborty, A.K., 1999. Toxicol. Lett., 107: 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00029-6

Claiborne, A., 1985. In: CRC handbook of methods in oxygen radical research (ed. R.A. Greenwald). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 283-284.

de Zwart, L.L., Meerman, J.H., Commandeur, J.N. and Vermeulen NP., 1999. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 26: 202-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00196-8

Erkmen, B., Karasu Benli, A.Ç., Ağuş, H.H., Yıldırım, Z., Mert, R. and Erkoç, F., 2017. Aquacult. Res., 48: 675-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12914

Ferguson, K.K., Caruso, R.L. and Meeker, J.D., 2011. Environ. Res., 111: 718-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.002

Faheem, M. and Lone, K.P., 2017. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci., 53: e17003.

Habig, W.H., Pabst, M.J. and Jakoby, W.B., 1974. J. biol. Chem., 249: 7130-7139.

Harman, D., 2006. Annls. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1067: 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1354.065

He, F., 2011. Bio-Protocol Bio-101, 2011: e45. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.45

Jollow, D.J., Mitchell, J.R., Zampaglione, N. and Gillete, J.R., 1974. Pharmacology, 11: 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1159/000136485

Kang, J.C., Jee, J.H., Koo, J.G., Keum, Y.H., Jo, S.G. and Park, K.H., 2010. Ecotoxicol. environ. Safe., 73: 1449-1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.07.025

Karataş, T., 2018. Pakistan J. Zool., 50: 1723-1729. http://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2018.50.5.1723.1729

Mankidy, R., Wiseman, S., Ma, H. and Giesy, J.P., 2013. Toxicol. Lett., 217: 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.11.025

Qu, R., Feng, M., Sun, P. and Wang, Z., 2015. Environ. Toxicol., 30: 1125-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.21985

Rhind, S.M., 2009. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., 364: 3391-3401. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0122

Srikanth, K., Pereira, E., Duarte, A.C. and Ahmad, I., 2013. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 20: 2133-2149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1459-y

Stara, A., Machova, J. and Velisek, J., 2012. Enviorn. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 33: 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2011.12.019

Tornero, V. and Hanke, G., 2016. Mar. Poll. Bull., 112: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.091

Valko, M., Leibfritz, D., Moncol, J., Cronin, M.T.D., Mazur, M. and Telser, J., 2007. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 39: 44-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001

Velisek, J., Stara, A., Kolarova, J. and Svobodova, Z., 2011. Pest. Biochem. Physiol., 100: 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.05.004

Wright, J.R., Colby, H.D. and Miles, P.R., 1981. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 206: 296-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(81)90095-3

Xu, H., Shao, X., Zhang, Z., Zou, Y, Wu, X. and Yang, L., 2013. Ecotoxicol. environ. Safe., 93: 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.03.038

Zhang, G., 2014. Toxin Rev., 34: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.3109/15569543.2014.958758

Zhao, X., Gao, Y. and Qi, M., 2014. Ecotoxicology, 23: 626-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1312-9

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Vol. 51, Iss. 5, Pages 1599-1997

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe