Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Decadal Population Traits and Fishery of Largehead Hairtail, Trichiurus lepturus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the East China Sea

PJZ_50_1_1-5

 

 

Decadal Population Traits and Fishery of Largehead Hairtail, Trichiurus lepturus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the East China Sea

Sher Khan Panhwar1,2,3, Zhou Yong Dong1,4,*, Gao Tianxiang1,3, Wang Ping5, Han Zhiqiang1, Wang Zhongming1,4 and Wang Yang1,4

1Marine Fisheries Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, China

2Fisheries College, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan, China

3Center of Excellence in Marine Biology, University of Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

4Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Technology Research for Fishery Resource of Zhejiang Province, Zhoushan, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Fishery Resources for Key Fishing Grounds, Ministry of Agriculture, China

5College of Pharmaceutical Sciences,, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China

ABSTRACT

Largehead hairtail, Trichiurus lepturus, fishery status in the East China Sea was estimated using length frequencies data sets for 2001, 2004, 2009 and 2013 and catch and effort data from 2000~2012. Length frequency data for 8,350 individuals were collected using pair trawl nets. The predominant size classes in the catch comprised of 130−374 mm in 2001, 83−360 mm in 2004, 53−355 mm in 2009, and 23−389 mm in 2013. Growth parameters of asymptotic length ranged from 515.6 to 768.6 mm in 2004 and 2009, growth coefficients ranged from 0.230 to 0.685, and t0 from -0.654 to -0.494. The rate of total mortality (Z) ranged from 0.82 to 2.73 year-1 in 2013 and 2001, respectively. The exploitation rate was estimated to range from 0.660−0.797 year-1. Catch per unit effort estimates showed a consistent decline in catches. This study is a start to bridge the gap between data and information, allowing resource managers to determine management priorities for this economically and ecologically important species in the ECS.


Article Information

Received 14 November 2016

Revised 03 March 2017

Accepted 23 March 2017

Available online 18 December 2017

Authors’ Contribution

SKP, analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. ZYD and WY collected data sets. GT, WP, HZ, WZ assisted in manuscript preparation

Key words

Largehead hairtail, Population traits, CPUE, Fishery, East China Sea.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2018.50.1.1.5

* Corresponding author: zyd511@126.com;

sk.panhwar@uok.edu.pk

0030-9923/2018/0001-0001 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2018 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Introduction

 

Largehead hairtail, Trichiurus lepturus, is an important fish resource of the East China Sea (ECS), which has been mainly exploited by fleets from the Fujian, Jiangsu, Shanghai and Zhejiang provinces. A steady increase in fishing vessels (stow net) from 1,100 to 1,200 in Zhejiang province has been registered over a decade, increasing production from 9.43 to 10.02 % (Chen et al., 2009). Li et al. (2010) reported catch composition proportions from stow net survey programs in the ECS during 2000 to be 97 percent for yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) and 61 percent for largehead hairtail.

Largehead hairtail is a slow growing species with a life span of up to nine years (Wu, 1985, 1991; Du et al., 1988). Xue and Luo (1993) suggested the annual average yield in the ECS for this species to be 42x104 MT, which might be obtained following proper management practices. Lin (1987) reported that wide fluctuation in the abundance of large yellow croaker, an important prey item for this work’s target species, in addition to overfishing, caused large changes in largehead hairtail population structure during the last 20-30 years. Additionally, Xu et al. (1994) reported a declining trend in largehead hairtail population condition, due to excessive fishing pressure. After analyzing a time-series on largehead hairtail population abundance, Zhou et al. (2002) suggested an increase in productivity and a decrease in mean population age. After an ECS three-month largehead hairtail fishery closure during the summer, Yan et al. (2007) reported an increase in average body weight and catch, immediately following closure. Following the studies of Yan et al. (2007) summer closures to manage largehead hairtail at the ECS have been implemented regularly (Yan et al., 2010).

The increase in fishing pressure detailed above has been reported to increase fishery production from 9.43% to 10.02 % (Chen et al., 2009). This increase, however, might be short-lived, provided no investigations are conducted to evaluate the effects of fishing pressure on ECS largehead hairtail stocks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the state of current largehead hairtail population abundances and provide sound management advice for the fishery in the ECS.

 

Materials and methods

 

Growth, mortality, and exploitation rates for longhead hairtail were estimated from 8,350 individuals. Fish were obtained from stow-net fleets operating at the ECS during 2001, 2004, 2009, and 2013. Fish total length, mouth tip and anal opening length, and standard length were taken, together with individual weights. Population parameters were estimated using FiSAT II. Growth was estimated using the von Bertalanffy equation (Lt = L∞ [1-e -K (t-to)]; (Sparre and Venema, 1992), with the t0 parameter estimated as Log (-t0) = -0.392-0.275 Log (L) -1.038 Log (K) (Pauly, 1980). Mortality was estimated using a linearized length-converted catch curve (Sparre and Venema, 1992). The empirical equation for estimation of natural mortality for longhead hairtail was Log M = -0.0066-0.279 (Log) asymptotic length+0.6543 (Log) growth+0.4634 (Log) temperature (Pauly, 1980). Fishing mortality was estimated as F/Z and total mortality was the sum of natural and fishing mortality (Ricker, 1975). The exploitation rate was estimates as F/Z, the fraction of mortality due to fishing (Sparre and Venema, 1992). Fishing effort in the form of number of stow-net and pair trawl gears and catch in tones was used to calculate catch-per-unit-effort indices. Total catch was estimated using the equation:

Ct = qEtNt,

Where, Ct is catch at time t, Et is the effort expended at time t, Nt is abundance at time t and q is catchability or the portion of the stock captured by one unit of effort.

 

Results

 

Most fish were in the range from 180 to 240 mm for the entire dataset. For fish sampled during 2001, length peaked between 150 and 260 mm, for 2004, length peaked between 170 and 210 mm, for 2009, peak length was from 180 to 220, and for 2010, that peak was from 190 to 270 mm. The trends indicate slow growth and catches of pre-recruit individual, below legal harvestable size for this species. Unregulated gear usage, in addition, could have caused limited representation of small and large largehead hairtail individuals.

Population cohorts also indicate that lower and upper size classes were consistently targeted (Fig. 1), explaining the low numbers for such size classes. The VBGF estimated maximum length (asymptotic length) for this work ranged from 515.6 to 768.6 mm, the growth coefficients from 0.230 to 0.685, and the fishing mortality from 0.599 to


 

Table I.- Summary of the population parameters estimated for Largehead hairtail (T. lepturus) in the EC Sea fishing area (length used here is from snout tip to anus opening in mm).

Estimated population parameters

2001

2004

2009

2013

Number of individuals (n)

1161

1778

1819

3592

Mean length from snout tip to anus opening and weight in parenthesis

210 (155)

200 (128)

198 (129)

226 (193)

Asymptotic length (L)

537.6

515.6

642.6

768.6

Growth rate (K)

0.685

0.270

0.450

0.230

Fishing mortality (F)

2.227

0.764

1.307

0.599

Natural mortality (M)

0.503

0.276

0.363

0.221

Total mortality (Z) (CLimits95% of Z)

2.730

1.040

1.670

0.820

Length at fish does not grow (t0)

-0.494

-0.654

-0.530

-0.586

Goodness of fit (Rn)

0.888

0.614

0.846

0.596

Fishing limits (Flimit)

1.485

0.509

0.871

0.399

Optimum fishing (Fopt).

1.114

0.382

0.654

0.300

Exploitation ratio (U)

0.745

0.426

0.616

0.865

Exploitation rate (E)

0.797

0.660

0.759

0.700

Bottom water temperature

17.76

17.69

17.62

17.48

 

 

2.227 in 2013 and 2001, respectively. The exploitation rate and goodness of fit are summarized in (Table I). From the VBGF growth equation, largehead hairtail population growth ranged from 0.230 to 0.685 (Table I); whereas, growth performance was between 4−6 (Fig. 2). The total mortality (Z) was estimated separately for the entire data and for individual years.

The highest mortality was found in 2001 (2.73 per year) and the lowest in 2013 when Z score reached at 0.82 year-1 (Figs. 3, 4). A comparison between growth and mortality (Fig. 5) demonstrates large uncertainties in

 

 

 

 

theses population parameters. Over the period of a decade, data of fishing vessels and biomass (tones) were used to estimate catch per unit effort for largehead hairtail (Fig. 6). The catch per unit effort for largehead hairtail fishery in ECS area was reduced from 53 in 2001 and 49 in 2013, which indicates that this population might have been overfished beyond recovery.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Despite lack of basic biological and environment data on largehead hairtail, this paper demonstrates key population characteristics for the ECS. The VBGF parameters for the study population are largely different from previous studies by Fofandi (2012). The estimated exploitation rate of 0.8 year-1 was higher than the optimum exploitation rate recommended by Gulland (1971), leading support that the population of largehead hairtail in the ECS is overfished. The target length for the ECS largehead hairtail fishery (180−260 mm) caused pressure on the younger individuals for this fishery, keeping recruitment rates down, with the consequent low population levels at all size classes. It is generally accepted that natural mortality is very high during the larval stages and decreases as the age of fish approaching a steady rate (Jennings et al., 2001). The rate of natural mortality increases exponentially when the fish nears maximum age. A decline in CPUE, as observed in this study, suggests a fishery has overextended its resources. A decline in CPUE may also be a function of data uncertainties from data collections, such as personnel, time, and space from where data is gathered. Despite of these factors, a decline in CPUE should trigger an immediate management action, such as recommendations for a reduction in exploitation rates proportional to the declines in CPUE. Previous long-term studies of the ECS largehead hairtail fishery have alerted to an impending crisis in this industry (Yongjun and Jinlin, 1989). Similar conclusions have been reached for Trichiurus haumela fishery in the Zhejiang coastal waters of China (Wu et al., 1985; Wu, 1991; Ma, 1989; Xu et al., 2003). This study bridges an important gap between information for management and data. Our data provides information allowing resource managers to prioritize conservation of ECS fisheries and to contribute to curbing current overfishing and consequent stock depletion of largehead populations.

 

Conclusion

 

Keeping in view estimates of growth, mortality, exploitation and CPUE trends, this study would increase understanding of the current state of the stocks and prospect of future harvest strategy for sustainable exploitation of an economically and ecologically important fish species in this area.

 

Acknowledgment

 

The authors are grateful to Marine Fisheries Research Institute of Zhejiang Province for funding the study financially.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

Authors have declared no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

Beverton, R.J.H. and Holt, S.J., 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations, fishery investigations series II. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, pp. 533.

Chen, W., Bo, Z. and Zhou, W., 2009. Current analysis and investigation on fisheries of stow net in Zhejiang Province. J. Zhejiang Ocean Uni. (Natural Science) 28: 70-74.

Du, J., Li, F., Lin, S. and Zhang, Q., 1988. On age and growth of hairtail, Trichiurus haumela (Forskal) in western Taiwan. J. Oceanogr. Taiwan Strait, 7: 339-346.

Fofandi, M.D., 2012. Population dynamics and fishery of ribbonfish (Trichiurus lepturus) of Saurastra Coast. Open Access Sci. Rep., 1: 189. https://doi.org/10.4172/scientificreports.189

Gulland, J.A., 1971. The fish resource of the ocean. West Byfleet, Survey, Fishing News (Books), Ltd., FAO. Fish. Tech. Pap., 97: 425.

Jennings, S., Kaiser, M.J. and Reynolds, J.D., 2001. Marine fisheries ecology. Blackwell Science Ltd., ISBN.0-63205098.

Li, Z., Miao, Z., Yu, C., Chen, Z, H., Ji, Z., Zhang, J. and Shui, B., 2010. Analysis of composition and diversity of catches by stow net. J. South China Fish. Sci., 6: 46-53.

Lin X., 1987. Biological characteristics and resources status of three main commercial fishes in offshore waters of China, J. Fish. China, 11: 187-194.

Ma, Y., 1989. Catch change pattern of hairtail in the East China Sea. Mar. Sci., 5: 37-39.

Pauly, D., 1980. On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. J. Cons. CIEM, 39: 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/39.2.175

Ricker, W.E., 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 191: 1-382.

Sparre, P. and Venema, S., 1992. Introduction to the tropical fish stock assessment, Part 1-Manual. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap., 306/1 Rev. 1.

Wu, C., 1991. Distribution of young Hairtail in Zhejiang coastal waters, J. Zhejiang Coll. Fish., 10: 21-29.

Wu, C., 1985. Age and growth of Trichiurus lepturus on the off-shore fishing ground of Zhejiang province. J. Zhejiang Coll. Fish., 4: 9-24.

Wu, H., Guishu C., Jiankui, Z. and Jianfei, W., 1985. Study on the growth of the hairtails, Trichiurus haumela (Forskal). Oceanol. Limnol. Sin., 162: 156-168.

Xu, H., Lin Z., Ding Y. and Xu, Y., 1994. Resource condition and management countermeasure of largehead hairtail in the East China Sea. J. Zhejiang Coll. Fish., 13: 5-11.

Xu, H., Liuzi, X. and Zhou, Y.D., 2003. An elementary study on quota catch of hairtail, Trichiurus haumela in the East China Sea. J. Zhejiang Ocean Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 22: 1-6.

Xue, and Luo, Xue, P. and Luo B., 1993. Dynamics management of the hairtail Trichiurus japonicas (Pisces, Trichuridae) stocks in the East China Sea and the study of its optimal harvesting strategies, Oceanol. Limnol. Sin., 24: 72-78.

Yan, L., Hu, F., Li, S.F., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y.D. and Liu, Z.F., 2007. The effect of summer closed fishing and the reasonable utilization on hairtail (Trichiurus japonicus) resources in the East China Sea Region. J. Nat. Resour., 22: 606-612.

Yan, L., Liu, Z., LI, S., Ling, J., LI, J. and Li Z., 2010. Effects of new summer closed season of trawl fisheries on fishery ecology and resource enhancement on East China Sea. Mar. Fish, 32:186-191.

Yongjun, M. and Jinlin, X., 1989. Catch changes pattern of hairtail in the East China Sea. Mar. Sci., 5: 37-39

Zhou, Y.D., Xu, H.X. and Liu, Z.F., 2002. A study of stock structure of hairtail Trichiurus haumela in the East China Sea. J. Zhejiang Ocean Univ., 21: 315-320.

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

June

Vol. 50, Iss. 3, Pages 799-1198

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe