Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms of MDR1 and OPN Genes with Reproductive Traits in Different Breeds of Sows

PJZ_53_2_493-500

Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms of MDR1 and OPN Genes with Reproductive Traits in Different Breeds of Sows

Yifan Ni1, Jian Liu1, Fen Wu1, Jianfeng Cai1, Jinzhi Zhang1*, Jianqing Hua2 and Jiping Fu2

1College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

2Zhejiang Jiahua Pig Breeding Company Limited, Jinhua 321053, China

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to investigate the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of the Multiple Drug Resistance Gene 1(MDR1) and the Porcine Osteopotin (OPN) gene and their association with reproductive traits in Landrace, Large Yorkshire and Jinhua sows. A total of 316 sows of three different breeds were used to examine the genotypes, and DNA sequencing method was employed to detect the potential SNPs in this study. There were two SNP loci found in these genes totally. One mutation (G→A) was detected in exon 1 of MDR1 gene, which caused a synonymous mutation of amino acid (Leu→Leu), the other one (T→A) in exon 7 of OPN gene, resulting in a non-synonymous mutation (His→Gln). The association analysis indicated that the GG genotype of MDR1 gene and the TT genotype of OPN gene had the highest values for the total number of piglets born (TNB), the number of piglets born alive (NBA), piglet weight at birth (PWB) and litter weight at birth (LWB) in both primiparous and multiparous sows of the three breeds. These results suggested that the SNP locis of MDR1 and OPN genes can be used in Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) programs for rapid improvement of the reproductive traits in sows.


Article Information

Received 22 August 2019

Revised 13 October 2019

Accepted 30 October 2019

Available online 28 January 2021

Authors’ Contribution

JL and FW conceived and designed the experiments. YFN and JFC performed the experiments. JQH and JPF analyzed the data. JL and JFC contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. YFN and FW contributed to the writing of the manuscript. JZZ revised the manuscript.

Key words

MDR1, OPN, Single-nucleotide Polymorphism, Reproductive traits, Sows

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20190822030826

* Corresponding author: zhangjzs@zju.edu.cn

0030-9923/2021/0002-0493 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2021 Zoological Society of Pakistan



INTRODUCTION

Reproductive traits, especially litter traits, are one of the most economically important parameters in pig production (Linville et al., 2001). As the same time, reproductive traits are highly complicated, however, with rather low heritability which is only about 0.1, among various characteristics (Johnson et al., 1999; Campbell et al., 2003). It is not obviously effective to apply conventional breeding methods to improve these traits. With the development of molecular biology, it has become possible to find genetic markers and to carry out marker-assisted selection (MAS).

The human Multiple drug resistance gene 1(MDR1) is located on the long arm of chromosome 7 andcontains 28 introns (Pauli-Magnus et al., 2004), while the pig MDR1 is located on chromosome 9. The length of the MDR1 is 4.7 kb, less than 5% of the entire genome, encoding P-glycoprotein (P-gp) weighed 40 ku which consisting of 1280 amino acids in total. The P-gp is an ATP-dependent transmembrane outward transporter protein which can actively pump out chemical substances and drugs that are passively diffused into cells, leading to multiple drug resistance (Brambila-Tapia, 2013). As early as 1989, P-gp was reported to exist in tissues known to have blood-tissue barriers, such as the placenta (protecting the fetus), ovaries and testes, which were associated with reproduction (Sugawara et al., 1988; Cordon-Cardo et al., 1989). Later, Lankas et al. (1998) had found the importance of placental P-gp in protecting the fetus from potential teratogens, and the results showed that the fetus was more sensitive to teratogenic substances in pregnant mice lacking the MDR1 transporter in the placenta. There was confirmed that multiple drug resistant gene1 was closely related to treatments of many human diseases (Obata et al., 2006; Pauli-Magnus et al., 2004). Pappas et al. (2014) had also found that MDR1 gene expressed in placenta of human and guinea pig. However, the information on the association between polymorphism of MDR1 gene and reproductive traits of sows is poorly unknown. Based on the relationship between the MDR1 gene and the reproductive system diseases such as ovarian cancer (Obata et al., 2006) discussed above, we can speculate that the MDR1 gene may be closely related to animal reproductive organs and the polymorphism may be related to animal reproductive performance.

There was found that the porcine osteopotin gene (OPN) could increase the mRNA and protein expression of P-gp in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, and their results indicated that OPN was a potential therapeutic target for cancer therapy to reduce drug resistance in sensitive tumors (Hsieh et al., 2013). The osteopontin is a secreted glycosylation protein isolated from bone matrix by Bernards et al. (2008) which is rich in arginine-glycine-aspartate (Arg-Gly-Asp, RGD) structures. It plays an important role in mediating the connection between bone matrix and bone tissue cells and that’s why it’s called osteopontin. The binding of osteopontin and CD44 receptor plays a vital role in mediating the interaction between cell matrix and cell signal transduction (Stier et al., 2005). Meanwhile, osteopontin was also found to be involved in regulating embryonic growth and development, initiating and maintaining pregnancy (Garlow et al., 2002; Goncalves et al., 2007; Monaco et al., 2009). There are also an increasing number of studies showing that the Porcine Osteopontin (OPN gene) is expressed in humans and other mammals. It has been found that osteopontin expressed in various tissues such as bone, liver, testis, ovary and placenta (Pines et al., 1995). OPN gene, expressed abundantly in uterine epithelium and immune cells that were key contributors in pig embryo attachment and placentation, may interact with receptors and uterus to improve conceptus development and be the signaling between these tissues (Garlow et al., 2002). OPN mRNA expression in the ovine uterus was induced by progesterone and led to the secretion of OPN gene into the uterine lumen by endometrial glandular epithelium (Johnson et al., 2000). Given that OPN gene was detected in the uterus of humans, as well as pigs, Johnson et al. (2003) believed that the OPN gene had the potential to profoundly impact pregnancy. It has also been reported that the OPN gene expressed in both mature and immature oocytes and follicular cells (Monaco et al., 2008). Moreover, Kapelański et al. (2013) found the marker genotypes characterized by OPN gene had an important influence on the weight of the uterus, the weight and volume of the ovary and other reproductive system indicators in both breeds (Polish Large White and Polish Landrace gilts). However, while the studies on OPN gene polymorphism and porcine fertility is available in artificial insemination boars (Lin et al., 2006), Tibet pigs (Niu et al., 2008), Polish Landrace and Polish Large White sows (Korwin-Kossakowska et al., 2013) and other pig breeds, the literatures concerning OPN gene and prolificacy of Landrace, Yorkshire and Jinhua sows were limited. And we guess that the SNP of the OPN gene may be closely associated with reproductive traits of these sows through the above summary.

In this study, three sow breeds including Landrace, Large Yorkshire and Jinhua sows were selected as the research objects. Direct sequencing of DNA was applied to detect SNPs in exon 1 of MDR1 gene and exon 7 of OPN gene, we analyzed the associations between the SNP sites of MDR1 and OPN genes, and productive traits such as total litter size, alive litter size and litter weight at birth in both primiparous and multiparous sows. The goal of the study was to provide useful information for marker-assisted breeding to improve reproductive performance of sows.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement

All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with Chinese guidelines for animal welfare and approved by t the Laboratory Animal Center of Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China).

Animals and DNA extraction

In the present experiment, ear tissue samples were collected from 316 sows, including 70 Landrace (18 primiparous sows and 52 multiparous sows), 140 Large Yorkshire (21 primiparous sows and 119 multiparous sows) and 106 Jinhua (17 primiparous sows and 89 multiparous sows), all from Zhejiang Jiahua Breeding Company Limited. All of these sows were provided same feed and water and kept under natural temperature conditions. The reproductive performance records of corresponding sows from 2011 to 2015 were analyzed and sorted out, including the total number of piglets born (TNB), the number of piglets born alive (NBA), piglet weight at birth (PWB) and litter weight at birth (LWB). 150 mg of pig ear tissue was cut into an EP tube, and DNA was extracted according to the instructions of the Tiangen Genoic DNA Extraction Kit. The extracted DNA was detected by 1.0% electrophoresis agarose gels, the DNA concentration was measured by Nano 2000 and diluted to 50ng L-1, and then stored them at 20°C for subsequent experiments.

Primer design and PCR amplification

In this experiment, primer sequences based on the pig MDR1 (GenBank NO. NC_010451.4) and OPN gene (GenBank NO. NC_010450.4) were designed by Primer 5.0 and synthesized by Invitrogen (Shanghai) Trading Company Limited. Taking the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure into account, the primer sequences for MDR1 were as followings: forward 5’-GCGGTCTGGCTGATTGGC-3’ and reverse 5’-CCTCGGGCTTTCCCTCTG-3’; and the following were those for OPN gene: forward 5’-TGGATGCCACAGAGGAAG-3’ and reverse 5’-CATTCGAGATATTTTATTCACA-3’. The PCR was performed in a reaction volume of 25 μL containing 12.5 μL 2×Taq Master Mix, 1μL of forward and reverse primer respectively, 2 μL DNA template and 8.5 μL ddH2O. PCR amplification was performed using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, 35 amplification cycles including denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 4 min. The PCR amplification products were examined by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose gel.

PCR product purification and sequencing

The PCR products were sent to Shanghai Shenggong Biotechnology Company Limited for purification and sequencing. Sequencing peak maps and sequences were analyzed using BioEdit and DNA star software.

Statistics analysis

Allele frequency, genotype frequency, χ2 Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium estimations, polymorphism information content (PIC), population heterozygosity (He) and effective allele number (Ne) were calculated using POPGENE1.31. According to fixed effect model, General Linear Model (GLM) procedure in SAS 8.2 software was used to compare the reproductive performance of the four sow breeds among different genotypes of the 2 genes respectively. The following was the statistical models used in the analysis: Yijk=μ+Gi+Pj+Sk+eijk. Where Yijk is observation of reproductive traits; μ is the population mean; Gj is effect of gene; Pi is effect of parity (j=1, 2, 3…8); Sk is environmental effect (k=1, 2, 3, 4); and eijk is random error.

 

RESULTS

PCR amplification of MDR1 and OPN genes

Taking genomic DNA of different pig breeds as templates, the gene fragments of exon 1 of MDR1 gene and exon 7 of OPN gene were amplified, and the amplified products were detected by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose gel. The amplified fragments were 280 bp and 780 bp, respectively (Figs. 1, 2), which can be used for subsequent studies because of the consistence with the expected fragment sizes, better amplification effects, better banding specificity, and higher brightness. The positions of amplified fragments on chromosome 9 of MDR1 and chromosome 8 of the OPN gene were from 93050045 to 93050281 and from 131077789 to 131078590 in accordance with Sscrofa11.1, respectively.

SNPs identification of MDR1 and OPN genes and its genotyping

The peak maps and sequences obtained after purification and sequencing of the PCR products were compared and analyzed by software such as BioEdit and DNA star (Figs. 3, 4). In the examined population of the three sow breeds, exon 1 of MDR1 gene was mutated at 154 bp (G→A), thus, leading to appearance of the three genotypes, namely, GG, AA and AG. There was no amino acid change at the location, which caused a synonymous mutation (Leu→Leu) (Fig. 3). For OPN gene, one mutation was detected in exon 7 of which at position 288, and the two alleles (T and A) with three genotypes (TT, AA, and AT) were determined (Fig. 4). Mutations at this site was a nonsynonymous mutation (His→Gln).


 

 

 

 

Genotypes and allele frequency of MDR1 and OPN genes and sample genetic characteristics

In Landrace, Large Yorkshire, and Jinhua sows, the major alleles of MDR1 and OPN genes were G and T, respectively. The allelic frequencies of MDR1 and OPN genes of the three population were shown in the Tables I and II. It could be seen from Chi-square test that MDR1 and OPN genes reached the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in all four populations (p>0.05). By analyzing the PIC, He and Ne of MDR1 and OPN genes in the three populations, it could be found that the PIC of MDR1 and OPN genes were more than 0.25 and less than 0.5 in the populations, indicating that MDR1 and OPN genes were in a moderate polymorphism in the study.

Association analysis of genetic polymorphism with reproductive performance

According to the two gene mutations for individual genotype, the least squares method was used to analyze the effects of different genotypes on traits (TNB, NBA, PWB and LWB) of the primiparous and multiparous sows of the three breeds in this experiment. From Tables III and IV, both MDR1 and OPN genes had significant effects on reproductive traits of the three sow breeds (P<0.05). Interestingly, in the primiparous and multiparous Landrace, Large Yorkshire and Jinhua sows, the reproductive traits (TNB, NBA, PWB and LWB) of the different genotypes of MDR1 gene all showed a trend of AA>GG>AG. The primiparous and multiparous sows with GG genotype had higher TNB, NBA, PWB and LWB values than AA genotype (P<0.05), although the AG genotypes were not significantly different from the GG and AA genotypes (P>0.05). The OPN gene also showed a similar trend that the TNB, NBA, PBW and LWB values of the TT genotype individuals were significantly higher than those of the AA genotype individuals (P<0.05); the difference between AT genotype individuals and TT genotype individuals was not significant; and either of AT genotype individuals or AA genotype individuals (P>0.05).

 

Table I. Genotype and allele frequencies at each locus of MDR1 gene.

Breeds

No.

Genotype frequency

Allele frequency

χ2

PIC

He

Ne

GG

AG

AA

G

A

Landrace

70

0.3857(27)

0.3571(25)

0.2571(18)

0.5643

0.4357

0.2760

0.4905

0.4917

1.9673

Large Yorkshire

140

0.4500(63)

0.3643(51)

0.1857(26)

0.6321

0.3679

3.1450

0.3569

0.4651

1.8695

Jinhua

106

0.4057(43)

0.2830(30)

0.3113(33)

0.5472

0.4528

1.2360

0.3727

0.4955

1.9821

 

χ20.05(2)=5.99. PIC, polymorphism information content; He, heterozygosity; Ne, effective number of alleles.

 

Table II. Genotype and allele frequencies at each locus of OPN gene.

Breeds

No.

Genotype frequency

Allele frequency

χ2

PIC

He

Ne

TT

AT

AA

T

A

Landrace

70

0.4143(29)

0.4571(32)

0.1286(9)

0.6429

0.3571

3.4760

0.3537

0.4592

1.8491

Large yorkshire

140

0.4500(63)

0.2571(36)

0.2929(41)

0.5786

0.4214

3.8750

0.3687

0.4876

1.9516

Jinhua

106

0.3962(42)

0.2547(27)

0.3491(37)

0.5236

0.4764

3.0550

0.3606

0.4893

1.9581

 

χ20.05(2)=5.99. PIC, polymorphism information content; He, heterozygosity; Ne, effective number of alleles.

 

Table III. Reproductive traits in relation to MDR1 gene.

Breeds

Genotype

Primiparous sows

Multiparous sows

TNB

NBA

PWB

LWB

TNB

NBA

PWB

LWB

Landrace

GG

13.45 ±0.21a

12.51 ±0.77a

1.71 ±0.27a

21.41 ± 0.23a

13.96 ± 0.35 a

13.21 ± 0.88a

1.78 ±0.28a

23.52 ±0.87a

AG

13.09 ±0.42ab

12.11 ±0.38ab

1.62 ±0.08ab

19.62 ± 0.41 ab

13.52 ± 0.53 ab

12.73 ± 0.16ab

1.68 ±0.18ab

21.38 ±0.44ab

AA

12.51 ±0.26b

11.37 ±0.24b

1.52 ±0.15b

17.28 ± 0.56b

13.05 ± 0.25b

11.99 ± 0.27b

1.58 ±0.16b

18.93 ±0.37b

Large Yorkshire

GG

11.51 ±0.21a

10.53 ±0.23a

1.47 ±0.28a

15.48 ± 0.24a

12.13 ± 0.14a

11.25 ± 0.26a

1.51 ±0.43a

16.97 ±0.18a

AG

10.94 ±0.23ab

10.07 ±0.24ab

1.35 ±0.18ab

13.61 ± 0.25ab

11.58 ± 0.33ab

10.74 ± 0.31ab

1.41 ± 0.28ab

15.15 ±0.18ab

AA

10.31 ±0.34b

9.42 ±0.33b

1.29 ±0.13b

12.17 ± 0.37b

10.89 ± 0.19b

10.13 ± 0.45b

1.31 ± 0.12b

13.28 ± 0.11b

Jinhua

GG

12.78 ±0.24a

12.01 ±0.31a

1.06 ±0.04a

12.74 ± 0.34a

13.49 ± 0.22a

12.68 ± 0.34a

1.08 ± 0.23a

13.82 ± 0.14a

AG

12.15 ±0.33ab

11.28 ±0.29ab

0.91 ±0.02ab

10.27 ± 0.22ab

12.94 ± 0.22ab

12.27 ± 0.19ab

0.99 ± 0.06ab

12.18 ± 0.13ab

AA

11.51 ±0.31b

10.79 ±0.36b

0.82 ±0.03b

8.85 ± 0.34b

12.15 ± 0.23b

11.71 ± 0.66b

0.88 ± 0.15b

10.31 ± 0.24b

 

For the same trait among the same group of sows, values with different letter superscripts in the same line mean significant difference (P<0.05); with the same or no letter superscripts in the same line mean no significant difference (P>0.05). TNB, total number of piglets born; NBA, number of piglets born alive; PWB, pig weight at birth; LWB, litter weight at birth.

 

Table IV. Reproductive traits in relation to OPN gene.

Breeds

Genotype

Primiparous sows

Multiparous sows

TNB

NBA

PWB

LWB

TNB

NBA

PWB

LWB

Landrace

TT

13.54 ±0.23a

12.46 ±0.47a

1.70 ±0.17a

21.26 ±0.51a

14.11 ±0.35 a

13.31 ± 0.68a

1.75 ± 0.18a

23.31 ± 0.87a

AT

13.06 ±0.32ab

12.09 ±0.36ab

1.61 ±0.07ab

19.51 ±0.85 ab

13.62 ±0.23 ab

12.77 ± 0.19ab

1.65 ±0.17ab

21.06 ± 0.44ab

AA

12.61 ±0.26b

11.42 ±0.19b

1.51 ±0.17b

17.25 ±0.41b

13.09 ±0.24b

12.05 ±0.25b

1.56 ±0.15b

18.76 ± 0.37b

Large Yorkshire

TT

11.29 ±0.22a

10.34 ±0.14a

1.48 ±0.48a

15.31 ±0.25a

11.89 ±0.24a

11.03 ±0.27a

1.53 ±0.49a

16.88 ±0.15a

AT

10.98 ±0.24ab

10.03 ±0.09ab

1.36 ±0.28ab

13.65 ±0.26ab

11.49 ±0.33ab

10.72 ±0.33ab

1.41 ±0.26ab

15.11 ±0.11ab

AA

10.54 ±0.33b

9.75 ±0.32b

1.31 ±0.01b

12.76 ±0.38b

11.12 ±0.21b

10.41 ±0.43b

1.33 ±0.11b

13.85 ±0.41b

Jinhua

TT

12.59 ±0.14a

11.81 ±0.11a

1.05 ±0.11a

12.42 ±0.14a

13.57 ±0.21a

12.81 ±0.31a

1.11 ±0.21a

14.23 ±0.14a

AT

12.01 ±0.23ab

11.08 ±0.19ab

0.96 ±0.05ab

10.65 ±0.34ab

12.72 ±0.62ab

12.03 ±0.13ab

1.01 ±0.06ab

12.13 ±0.13ab

AA

11.27 ±0.21b

10.69 ±0.33b

0.87 ±0.12b

9.42 ±0.31b

12.05 ±0.23b

11.31 ±0.46b

0.91 ±0.15b

10.33 ±0.24b

 

For the same trait among the same group of sows, values with different letter superscripts in the same line mean significant difference (P<0.05); with the same or no letter superscripts in the same line mean no significant difference (P>0.05). TNB, total number of piglets born; NBA, number of piglets born alive; PWB, pig weight at birth; LWB, litter weight at birth.

 

DISCUSSION

The reproductive traits of sows, including TNB, NBA, PWB and LWB, are important economic characteristics in modern pig production. The reproductive performance affects the production efficiency and economic benefits of farms directly. However, the heritability of reproductive traits is extremely low, and it is occurred at a low efficiency and rate about improvement of these traits (Bidanel et al., 2008). Thus, it is meaningful to study the genes related to reproductive traits of pigs and reveal the genetic mechanism affecting the reproductive performance and the prolificacy of high-breeding pigs. At present, many reports on MDR1 gene polymorphisms are related to its relationship with genital diseases. Compared to Landrace, Yorkshire, Duroc and Jinhua sows, studies on OPN gene polymorphisms have mainly focused on ruminants, avian animals and other pigs. Therefore, this study analyzed MDR1 and OPN genes of the three sow breeds to investigate the polymorphisms of the two genes in the pig populations. In the present study, we found that the polymorphisms of MDR1 and OPN genes impacted reproductive traits of the sows and could be markers.

In the present study, the MDR1 gene was used as a candidate gene to explore the reproductive performance of sows. The results showed that one mutation (G→A) occurred at 154 bp of exon 1 of MDR1 gene; among the three genotypes presented (GG, AA, AG), the sows with GG genotype had higher values about reproductive traits. We found that the mutation in the MDR1 gene had the same effect on the reproductive performance of different sow populations selected in this study. Previous studies have shown that MDR1 gene widely expressed in the fetal placenta and played pivotal roles in protecting the fetus from insults of drugs and xenobiotics, which might explain why MDR1 gene could prevent drugs from reaching the litter through the placenta (Pappas et al., 2014; Han et al., 2018). In view of low immunity of litters, MDR1 gene played an important role in protecting litters if the drug reached the body of the dam and mighty cause the death of litters. This may explain that the MDR1 gene polymorphism has a significant effect on reproductive traits in sows. This is also consistent with our results, thus, these findings could suggest that MDR1 gene may be a candidate gene associated with sow reproductive performance and that the mutation site detected in this gene may be a useful genetic marker for reproductive performance in pigs.

The studies on OPN gene have become increasingly popular these years, and many of them are the ones on the polymorphisms at present. In pregnant sows, OPN gene was induced by conceptual estrogen in the uterine luminal epithelium and was regulated in the glandular epithelium in a manner consistent with placental progesterone production (White et al., 2005). Extracting the samples of the sow ovary and fallopian tube tissue, Goluch et al. (2009) detected two mutations (A→G) occurring at positions of 617 and 608, respectively. Nevertheless, it could be found that the major alleles and their frequencies of the OPN gene mutations varied from one study to the next. Lin et al. (2006) by investigating mutations in the OPN gene intron of the purebred Pitland boars, crossbred Hampshire Pietrain boars in northwestern Germany, found the frequencies of the B allele were 0.54 and 0.75, respectively. Niu et al. (2008) used the DNA mutation in the OPN gene to determine the associations between the genotype and litter size in Tibet pigs, and their data showed that B allele was dominant in Tibet pigs with a frequency of 0.804. Three different genotypes (AA, AB, BB) were found in the mutation of the intron 6 of the OPN gene in 71 sows (46 in the luteal and 25 in the follicular phase) in the Korwin-Kossakowska et al. (2013) ’s experiment, and the frequency of major allele B was 0.61. However, Oztabak et al. (2008) found that the OPN gene had a mutation (T→G) and the frequency of T allele was higher. And in our study, the mutation (T→A) occurred at 288 bp of exon 7 of OPN gene, which caused the frequencies of major alleles in the four populations were 0.64, 0.58 and 0.52, respectively. Many studies have found that the OPN gene was closely related to the reproductive traits of pigs. Southwood et al. (1998) suggested that it was possible to use the microsatellite sequence in the OPN gene locus as a marker of the reproductive traits TNB and NBA. They found 13 alleles, five of which were related to litter size in the synthetic line. And the polymorphism of OPN gene had a significant effect on boar fertility traits such as NBA (Lin et al., 2006). Meanwhile, previous studies by Zhang et al. (2010) showed that the genotype of AA and AB of OPN gene could increase the LWB, but did not reach the significant level. The expression level of the OPN gene was significantly associated with LWB (Korwin-Kossakowska et al., 2013). Among the mutation sites found in this study, three genotypes, TT, AA and AT, were detected, and TT was the dominant genotype. In the primiparous and multiparous sows of the 3 populations texted, the reproductive performance of the TT genotype was significantly better than the AA genotype (P<0.05). However, considering that the reproductive performance of livestock is affected by many factors, and the genetic background of different varieties is very different, the effects of each genotype on reproductive performance can be different. Therefore, it is also necessary to expand the sample size to conduct further systematic studies on different breeds of pigs.

 

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our results found that polymorphisms of the MDR1 and OPN genes were associated with reproductive traits in Landrace, Large Yorkshire and Jinhua three sow breeds. The present study showed that sows with the GG genotype of MDR1 gene or the TT genotype of OPN gene had the highest values for reproductive traits (TNB, NBA, PBW and LBW) in both primiparous and multiparous sows of the 3 breeds. We indicate that MDR1 and OPN genes may be possible markers of reproduction traits. However, it is also necessary to conduct further systematic studies on other different breeds of pigs, as there may be different results for different breeds.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0500503), the Program of Breeding of New Species of Agricultural (Livestock and Poultry) Program in Zhejiang (2012C12906-6) and (2016C02054-3).

 

Competing interests

All the authors declared no conflict of interests.

 

REFERENCE

Bernards, M.T., Qin, C. and Jiang, S., 2008. MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion to hydroxyapatite with adsorbed bone sialoprotein, bone osteopontin, and bovine serum albumin. Colloids Surface B., 64: 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.01.025

Bidanel, J.P., Rosendo, A., Iannuccelli, N., Riquet, J., Gilbert, H., Caritez, J.C., Billon, Y., Amigues, Y., Prunier, A. and Milan, D., 2008. Detection of quantitative trait loci for teat number and female reproductive traits in Meishan x Large White F2 pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 2: 813-820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108002097

Brambila-Tapia, A.L.J., 2013. MDR1 (ABCB1) polymorphisms: functional effects and clinical implications. Rev. Invest. Clin., 65: 445-454.

Campbell, E.M., Nonneman, D. and Rohrer, G.A., 2003. Fine mapping a quantitative trait locus affecting ovulation rate in swine on chromosome 8. J. Anim. Sci., 81: 1706-1714. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8171706x

Cordon-Cardo, C., O”Brien, J.P., Casals, D., Rittman-Grauer, L., Biedler, J.L., Melamed, M.R. and Bertino, J.R., 1989. Multidrug-resistance gene (P-glycoprotein) is expressed by endothelial cells at blood-brain barrier sites. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 86: 695-698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.2.695

Garlow, J.E., Ka, H., Johnson, G.A., Burghardt, R.C., Jaeger, L.A. and Bazer, F.W., 2002. Analysis of osteopontin at the maternal-placental interface in pigs. Biol. Reprod., 66: 718-725. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.3.718

Goluch, D., Korwin-Kossakowska, A., Prusak, B., Pierzchala, M., Urbanski, P., Michaluk, A. and Sender, G., 2009. The study of polymorphism within the promoter region of the osteopontin (OPN) gene in sows. Neuro-Endocrinol. Lett., 30: 525-529.

Goncalves, R.F., Wolinetz, C.D., Killian, G.J., 2007. Influence of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD), integrins (αV and α5) and osteopontin on bovine sperm–egg binding and fertilization in vitro. Theriogenology, 67: 0-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.08.013

Han, L.W., Chunying, G. and Qingcheng, M., 2018. An update on expression and function of p-gp/abcb1 and bcrp/abcg2 in the placenta and fetus. Expert Opin. Drug Met., 8: 817-829. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2018.1499726

Hsieh, I.S., Huang, W.H., Liou, H.C., Chuang, W.J., Yang, R.S. and Fu, W.M., 2013. Upregulation of drug transporter expression by osteopontin in prostate cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol., 83: 968-977. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.112.082339

Johnson, G.A., Burghardt, R.C., Bazer, F.W. and Spencer, T.E., 2003. Osteopontin: roles in implantation and placentation, Biol. Reprod., 69: 1458-1471. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.020651

Johnson, G.A., Spencer, T.E., Burghardt, R.C., Taylor, K.M., Gray, C.A. and Bazer, F.W., 2000. Progesterone modulation of osteopontin gene expression in the ovine uterus. Biol. Reprod., 62: 1315-1321. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1315

Johnson, R.K., Nielsen, M.K. and Casey, D.S., 1999. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 541-557. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.773541x

Kapelański, W., Eckert, R., Jankowiak, H., Mucha, A., Bocian, M. and Grajewska, S., 2013. Polymorphism of ESR, FSHß, RBP4, PRL, OPN genes and their influence on morphometric traits of gilt reproductive tract before sexual maturity. Acta Vet. Brno, 82: 369-374. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201382040369

Korwin-Kossakowska, A., Goluch, D., Kapelański, W., Bocian, M. and Sender, G., 2013. Polymorphisms of the osteopontin gene and level of its expression in the reproductive tract of sows. Annls Anim. Sci., 13: 241-252. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2013-0006

Lankas, G.R., Wise, L.D., Cartwright, M.E., Pippert, T. and Umbenhauer, D.R., 1998. Placental P-glycoprotein deficiency enhances susceptibility to chemically induced birth defects in mice. Reprod. Toxicol., 12: 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6238(98)00027-6

Lin, C., Tholen, E., Jennen, D., Ponsuksili, S., Schellander, K. and Wimmers, K., 2006. Evidence for effects of testis and epididymis expressed genes on sperm quality and boar fertility traits. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 41: 538-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00710.x

Linville, R.C., Pomp, D., Johnson, R.K. and Rothschild, M.F., 2001. Candidate gene analysis for loci affecting litter size and ovulation rate in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 79: 60-67. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79160x

Monaco, E., Gasparrini, B., Boccia, L, Rosa, D.A., Attanasio, L. and Killian, G., 2009. Effect of osteopontin (OPN) on in vitro embryo development in cattle. Theriogenology, 71: 0-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.012

Monaco, E., Lima, A., Wilson, S., Kim, D., Bionaz, M., Hurley, W.L. and Wheeler, M.B., 2008. 182 Osteopontin gene expression in immature and mature swine cumulus cells and oocytes. Reprod. Fert. Develop., 20: 171-171. https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv20n1Ab182

Niu, S.Y., Wang, X.P., Hao, F.G. and Zhao, R.X., 2008. Effect of the polymorphism of RBP4 and OPN genes on litter size in Tibet pigs. Acta Agric. Scand. Sec. A-Anim. Sci., 58: 1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064700802054170

Obata, H., Yahata, T., Quan, J., Sekine, M. and Tanaka, K., 2006. Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of drug resistance-associated genes and response to chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res., 26: 2227.

Oztabak, K., Un, C., Tesfaye, D., Akis, I. and Mengi, A., 2008. Genetic polymorphisms of osteopontin (OPN), prolactin (PRL) and pituitary-specific transcript factor-1 (PIT-1) in South Anatolian and East Anatolian Red cattle. Acta Agric. Scand A-AN., 58: 109112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064700802357771

Pappas, J.J., Petropoulos, S., Suderman, M., Iqbal, M., Moisiadis, V., Turecki, G., Matthews, S.G. and Szyf, M., 2014. The multidrug resistance 1 gene Abcb1 in brain and placenta: Comparative analysis in human and guinea pig. PLoS One, 9: e111135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111135

Pauli-Magnus, C. and Kroetz, D.L., 2004. Functional implications of genetic polymorphisms in the multidrug resistance gene MDR1 (ABCB1). J. Art Pharm. Res-Dordr., 21: 904-913. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000029276.21063.0b

Pines, M., Knopov, V. and Bar, A., 1995. Involvement of osteopontin in egg shell formation in the laying chicken. Matrix Biol., 14: 765-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0945-053X(05)80019-8

Southwood, O.I., Short, T.H. and Plastow, G.S., 1998. Genetic markers for litter size in commercial lines of pigs. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Armidale, 11-16 January, pp. 453-456.

Stier, S., Ko, Y., Forkert, R., Lutz, C., Neuhaus, T., Grunewald, E., Cheng, T., Domobkowski, D., Calvi, L.M., Ritting, S. and Scadden, D., 2005. Osteopontin is a hematopoietic stem cell niche component that negatively regulates stem cell pool size. J. exp. Med., 201: 1781-1791. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20041992

Sugawara, I., Kataoka, I., Morishita, Y., Hamada, H., Tsuruo, T., Itoyama, S. and Mori, S., 1988. Tissue distribution of P-glycoprotein encoded by a multidrug-resistant gene as revealed by a monoclonal antibody, MRK 16. Cancer Res., 48: 1926-1929.

White, F.J., Ross, J.W., Joyce, M.M., Geisert, R.D., Burghardt, R.C. and Johnson, G.A., 2005. Steroid regulation of cell specific secreted phosphoprotein 1 (osteopontin) expression in the pregnant porcine uterus. Biol. Reprod., 73: 1294-1301. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.105.045153

Zhang, D.J., Liu, D., Yang, G.W., Fu, X.K. and He, X.M., 2010. Impact of the NCOA1, OPN and RBP4 genes on individual weight at birth and individual weight at 30 days in hybrid pig. Acta Agric. Scand. Sec. A – Anim. Sci., 60: 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064701003605166

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

February

Vol. 53, Iss. 1, Pages 1-400

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe