The results showed that each traditional market in Sleman District, Bantul District, and Jogja City had high potential based on the vegetable variety.
The chemical composition analysis showed that vegetable waste protein content reached 19%, and fiber lower than 30% would support livestock growth.
Pb contamination in vegetable waste was still lower than the maximum level of Pb feed contamination.
Traditional market vegetable waste in the Special Region of Yogyakarta is potentially utilized as a ruminant feed based on the variety and chemical composition.
Selected from the article's own text.
Abstract
Muhsin Al Anas1*, Himmatul Hasanah2, Ali Agus1
1Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 2Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Math and Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Abstract | The relatively high-volume of vegetable waste in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province causes environmental problems. Although it contains high nutrients, vegetable waste potential as ruminant feed is yet optimally utilized due to the possible presence of heavy metals such as Pb, Cu, and Hg, which can reduce livestock productivity. This study aimed to determine the nutrients and heavy metals content of vegetable waste from 11 traditional markets in Yogyakarta. The results showed vegetable waste contains protein (>20%) and fiber (<30%). It was also noted that the heavy metal concentration is below the maximum tolerable limit for ruminant feed ingredients. The nutrient and heavy metal content showed no difference between Sleman District, Bantul District, and Jogja City. This study concludes that vegetable waste from traditional markets in the Special Region of Yogyakarta has prospective as ruminant feed due to its high nutrient content with a low level of heavy metal.
Keywords | Ruminant feed, Heavy metals, Nutrients, Vegetable waste, Yogyakarta
INTRODUCTION
The Special Region of Yogyakarta has a relatively high potential for vegetable waste due to the presence of many traditional markets as places for high-intensity vegetable transactions. Vegetables and fruit waste in traditional markets reaches 84% of total market waste . This waste was not optimally utilized and had an impact on environmental pollution. Processing vegetables and fruits waste into alternative feed can increase livestock productivity with low costs. Besides, it can reduce the pile of vegetable waste that pollutes the environment.
The problem with vegetable waste as ruminant feed is the high heavy metal content. Heavy metals consumed by ruminants decrease rumen fermentation performance and feed digestibility. Heavy metals become enzyme inhibitors in the gastrointestinal tract cause feed degradation was not optimal. Inhibited nutrient utilization causes a decrease in livestock productivity ; ; . Heavy metals such as Pb, Cu, and Cr in vegetables exceed the maximum limit ; . Based on this description, this study aims to determine the potential and heavy metal contamination of traditional market vegetable waste in the Special Region of Yogyakarta.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Samples collection
Vegetable waste samples were collected from 11 traditional markets in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Three traditional markets in Sleman District include Demangan, Condong Catur, and Gamping, three traditional markets in Bantul District covering Piyungan, Barongan, and Bantul. Meanwhile, five traditional markets in Jogja City include Kranggan, Beringharjo, Kotagede, Prawirotaman, and Giwangan. From each traditional market, a total of ±12 kg of vegetable waste was collected at three different points as replications, with ±4 kg of the sample at each replication. Vegetable waste samples were stored in plastic bags for laboratory analysis.
Identify the type of vegetable waste
A total of 1-2 kg of collected vegetable waste was used for identification. Vegetable waste was separated based on the variety and weighed to get the percentage of each vegetable waste.
Vegetable waste drying
The unsorted vegetable waste sample (1 kg), divided into three parts and wrapped in a weighed paper bag. The wrapped samples were heated in a 55°C oven for 3-5 days to obtain air-dried samples. The dry waste samples were ground into powder using a Wiley 2 mm grinding machine. Vegetable waste samples were analyzed proximate (crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, dry matter, and organic matter) using the AOAC (2005) and heavy metals (Pb, Cu, and Hg) through the atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) method .
Data analysis
Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a completely randomized design, followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) to determine the difference between mean values .
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The potential of traditional market vegetable waste in the Special Region of Yogyakarta is presented in Table 1. The results showed that each traditional market in Sleman District, Bantul District, and Jogja City had high potential based on the vegetable variety. Each traditional market has an average of 12 types of vegetable waste and was dominating by vegetables such as cabbage, spinach, water spinach, mustard greens, Chinese cabbage, green beans, chayote, cucumber, carrots, tomatoes, long beans, and jackfruit peels. A variety of waste will have various types of nutrients and potential as ruminant feed. According to some researchers, vegetable waste such as carrots, cabbage, spinach, cauliflower, tomatoes, banana leaves, corn husks, onion peels, cassava leaves, taro, jackfruit, cucumbers, potatoes, pumpkins, leek, celery, lettuce, broccoli, bananas, oranges, grapes, melons, pears, and plums have the potential as feed for ruminants ; ; ; .
There are many traditional markets in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. According to Statistics Indonesia (2019), the Special Region of Yogyakarta has 357 traditional markets. The number of traditional markets is due to the high people’s preference for purchases in traditional markets. People choose vegetables at an affordable price. Vegetables were mostly produced in rural areas in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, which affected the variety of vegetables in traditional markets. Furthermore, the supply of vegetables also comes from other producer areas, such as Magelang and Boyolali, which have vegetable production centers.
The chemical composition analysis of traditional market vegetable waste in the Special Region of Yogyakarta is shown in Table 2. The chemical composition of traditional market vegetable waste in Sleman District, Bantul District, and Jogja City were no different (P>0.05). It was due to the high percentage of aste variety in each district almost same.
The chemical composition analysis showed that vegetable waste protein content reached 19%, and fiber lower than 30% would support livestock growth. The protein and the fiber content of vegetable waste are almost equivalent to elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum S.) at 13.47-19.43% and 29.60-35.50% , and Setaria grass (Setaria sphacelata) about 20.31-23.44% and 24.02-30.41% . According to Bakshi et al. (2016), vegetable waste is a good source of crude fiber and energy, especially for ruminants. Sheep requires about 9.8-16.7% protein (National Research Council, 1985), vegetable waste as an alternative feed can increase productivity at an economical cost. According to research by Retnani et al. (2014), the utilization of 100% vegetable waste as wafers feed-in sheep has the highest body weight gain and a final weight of 25.6% higher than conventional feed.
The result of the analysis of heavy metal content in vegetable waste is presented in Table 3. The results showed that the contamination of heavy metals Pb, Cu, and Hg in Sleman District, Bantul District, and Jogja City did not show a significant difference (P>0.05). Pb contamination in all traditional markets is below 0.01 mg/kg. The maximum level of Pb contamination in forage for feed is 10-50 mg/kg ; . Pb contamination in vegetable waste was still lower than the maximum level of Pb feed contamination. The maximum Hg
Table 1: The potential of traditional market vegetable waste in the Sleman District, Special Region of Yogyakarta
No.
Market Name
Vegetable Type
Botanical Name
Total (g)
Percentage (%)
1.
Demangan
Basil leaves
Ocimum basilicum
1033
18.384%
Jackfruit peels
Artocarpus heterophyllus
534
9.503%
Grated coconut
Cocos nucifera
453
8.062%
Papaya
Carica papaya
444
7.902%
Cucumber
Cucumis sativus
393
6.994%
Banana leaves
Musa paradisiaca
373
6.638%
Water spinach
Ipomoea aquatica
345
6.140%
Others
330
5.873%
Spinach
Amaranthus spp.
279
4.965%
Eggplant
Solanum melongena
263
4.681%
Bamboo shoots
Dendrocalamus asper
235
4.182%
Young jackfruit
Artocarpus heterophyllus
206
3.666%
Mustard greens
parachinensis
170
3.025%
Chinese cabbage
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
144
2.563%
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
140
2.492%
Ridge gourd
Luffa acutangula
107
1.904%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
42
0.747%
Chayote
Sechium edule
34
0.605%
Green beans
Phaseolus vulgaris
22
0.392%
Celery
Apium graveolens
21
0.374%
Long beans
Vigna cylindrica (L.)
18
0.320%
Carrot
Daucus carota
12
0.214%
Corn husk
Zea mays
8
0.142%
Grape
Vitis vinifera
7
0.125%
Cassava leaves
Manihot utilissima
6
0.107%
2.
Condong Catur
Chinese cabbage
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
1755
34.574%
Chayote
Sechium edule
1142
22.498%
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
670
13.199%
Water spinach
Ipomea aquatica
606
11.939%
Cassava leaves
Manihot utilissima
244
4.807%
Mustard greens
parachinensis
242
4.768%
Tomato
Solanum lycopersicum
157
3.093%
Eggplant
Solanum melongena
135
2.660%
Green beans
Phaseolus vulgaris
51
1.005%
Spinach
Amaranthus spp.
35
0.690%
Long beans
Vigna cylindrica (L.)
15
0.296%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
11
0.217%
Onion peels
Allium cepa
9
0.177%
Chili
Capsicum annuum
4
0.079%
3.
Gamping
Water spinach
Ipomea aquatica
1448
32.701%
Spinach
Amaranthus spp.
627
14.160%
Kenikir leaves
Cosmos caudatus
527
11.902%
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
384
8.672%
Mustard greens
Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis
362
8.175%
Cucumber
Cucumis sativus
319
7.204%
Carrot peels
Daucus carota
234
5.285%
Guava
Syzygium aqueum
89
2.010%
Pumpkin
Cucurbita moschata Durch
70
1.581%
Eggplant
Solanum melongena
67
1.513%
Others
64
1.445%
Chayote
Sechium edule
53
1.197%
Radish
Raphanus sativus
42
0.949%
Long beans
Vigna cylindrica (L.)
42
0.949%
Corn
Zea mays
31
0.700%
Green beans
Phaseolus vulgaris
23
0.519%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
16
0.361%
Chili
Capsicum annuum
15
0.339%
Daun melinjo
Gnetum gnemon
8
0.181%
Klutuk banana leaves
Musa balbisiana
5
0.113%
Cassava leaves
Manihot utilissima
2
0.045%
Table 2: The potential of traditional market vegetable waste in the Bantul District, Special Region of Yogyakarta
No.
Market Name
Vegetable Type
Botanical Name
Total (g)
Percentage (%)
1.
Piyungan
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
2338
58.877%
Spinach
Amaranthus spp.
587
14.782%
Mustard greens
Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis
505
12.717%
Bay leaves
Syzygium polyanthum
312
7.857%
Bamboo shoots
Dendrocalamus asper
131
3.299%
Bitter melon
Momordica charantia
98
2.468%
2.
Barongan
Cucumber
Cucumis sativus
958
19.740%
Bitter melon
Momordica charantia
753
15.516%
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
689
14.197%
Tomato
Solanum lycopersicum
560
11.539%
Eggplant
Solanum melongena
261
5.378%
Water spinach
Ipomea aquatica
257
5.296%
Klutuk banana leaves
Musa balbisiana
235
4.842%
Carrot
Daucus carota
180
3.709%
Long beans
Vigna cylindrica (L.)
175
3.606%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
161
3.318%
Cassava leaves
Manihot utilissima
143
2.947%
Banana
Musa paradisiaca
138
2.844%
Taro
Colocasia esculenta
112
2.308%
Others
83
1.710%
Celery
Apium graveolens
55
1.133%
Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. Botrytis
44
0.907%
Mustard greens
Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis
44
0.907%
Bay leaves
Syzygium polyanthum
5
0.103%
3.
Bantul
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
1592
41.394%
Carrot
Daucus carota
771
20.047%
Long beans
Vigna cylindrica (L.)
495
12.871%
Cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. Botrytis
290
7.540%
Mustard greens
Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis
205
5.330%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
173
4.498%
Water spinach
Ipomea aquatica
163
4.238%
Potato
Solanum tuberosum
80
2.080%
Green beans
Phaseolus vulgaris
35
0.910%
Ridge gourd
Luffa acutangula
27
0.702%
Eggplant
Solanum melongena
8
0.208%
Chili
Capsicum annuum
7
0.182%
Table 3: The potential of traditional market vegetable waste in the Jogja City, Special Region of Yogyakarta
No.
Market Name
Vegetable Type
Botanical Name
Total (g)
Percentage (%)
1.
Kranggan
Green beans
Phaseolus vulgaris
1178
27.796%
Red apple
Malus domestica
424
10.005%
Long beans
Vigna cylindrica (L.)
348
8.211%
Spinach
Amaranthus spp.
324
7.645%
Chinese cabbage
Brassica rapa subsp. Pekinensis
287
6.772%
Mustard greens
parachinensis
272
6.418%
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
269
6.347%
Bamboo shoots
Dendrocalamus asper
219
5.168%
Star fruit
Averrhoa carambola
179
4.224%
Corn husk
Zea mays
162
3.823%
Celery
Apium graveolens
144
3.398%
Orange
Citrus reticulata
115
2.714%
Carrot
Daucus carota
91
2.147%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
89
2.100%
Banana
Musa paradisiaca
49
1.156%
Eggplant
Solanum melongena
31
0.731%
Tomato
Solanum lycopersicum
30
0.708%
Chili
Capsicum annuum
12
0.283%
Mangosteen peels
Garcinia mangostana
9
0.212%
Rambutan peels
Nephelium lappaceum
6
0.142%
2.
Beringharjo
Mustard greens
Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis
924
28.839%
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
907
28.308%
Eggplant
Solanum melongena
322
10.050%
Madeira vine
Anredera cordifolia
300
9.363%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
259
8.084%
Celery
Apium graveolens
243
7.584%
Carrot
Daucus carota
221
6.898%
Parsley
Petroselinum crispum
28
0.874%
3.
Kotagede
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
3222
74.774%
Potato
Solanum tuberosum
339
7.867%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
308
7.148%
Mustard greens
Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis
148
3.435%
Long beans
Vigna cylindrica (L.)
130
3.017%
Bay leaves
Syzygium polyanthum
66
1.532%
Celery
Apium graveolens
54
1.253%
Others
32
0.993%
Chili
Capsicum annuum
4
0.093%
Klutuk banana leaves
Musa balbisiana
4
0.093%
Carrot peels
Daucus carota
2
0.046%
4.
Prawirotaman
Sweet leaves
Sauropus androgynus
1619
37.827%
Jackfruit peels
Artocarpus heterophyllus
783
18.294%
Water spinach
Ipomea aquatica
530
12.383%
Spinach
Amaranthus spp.
475
11.098%
Cabbage
Brassica oleracea
435
10.164%
Chayote
Sechium edule
136
3.178%
Carrot
Daucus carota
102
2.383%
Orange
Citrus reticulata
71
1.659%
Banana peels
Musa paradisiaca
33
0.771%
Kenikir leaves
Cosmos caudatus
26
0.607%
Scallion
Allium fistulosum
24
0.561%
Tomato
Solanum lycopersicum
19
0.444%
Cassava leaves
Manihot utilissima
18
0.421%
Bay leaves
Syzygium polyanthum
7
0.164%
Green beans
Phaseolus vulgaris
2
0.047%
5.
Giwangan
Mustard greens
Brassica rapa subsp. parachinensis
3268
85.438%
Tomato
Solanum lycopersicum
378
9.882%
Eggplant
Solanum melongena
105
2.745%
Corn husk
Zea mays
74
1.935%
Table 4: Chemical composition of traditional market vegetable waste in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (%)*
District
Dry Matter
Organic Matter
Crude Protein
Crude Fiber
Ether Extract
Total Digestible Nutrient
Sleman
93.19
19.43
19.03
20.66
2.13
63.00
Bantul
89.79
22.96
18.90
23.42
1.69
68.80
Jogja City
91.04
22.30
22.73
20.11
1.47
68.33
Average
91.06
21.81
19.98
21.76
1.75
67.09
SE
1.913
1.189
0.966
1.110
0.191
1.713
P-value
0.802
0.507
0.235
0.434
0.478
0.230
*dry weight
Table 5: The heavy metal content of traditional market vegetable waste in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (dry matter sample)
District
Lead (Pb, mg/kg)
Copper (Cu, mg/kg)
Mercury (Hg; µg/kg)
Bantul
<0.01
18.39
23.46
Sleman
<0.01
18.50
33.12
Jogja City
<0.01
12.54
14.52
Average
<0.01
16.84
25.41
SE
0.000
1.740
5.414
P-value
1.000
0.352
0.397
contamination in the feed is 0.1 mg/kg. The Hg content in vegetable waste is still lower than the contamination limit based on Adamse et al. (2017). The standard of Hg content in ruminant feed is 0.1 mg/kg. Hg contamination in vegetable waste is below the maximum contamination limit.
The heavy metals content in vegetables was affected by several factors, such as pesticides and herbicides application, fertilizers, air pollution, soil and irrigation water contaminated with waste, and poor handling during the distribution process ; . The problem of utilizing vegetable waste as feed is high heavy metals contamination causes risks to livestock. Heavy metals such as Pb, Cu, and Cr, contained in vegetables, exceed normal permissible limits. Heavy metals consumed by ruminants will reduce rumen fermentation performance and decrease feed digestibility. Heavy metals become enzyme inhibitors in the digestive tract caused less feed degradation. Low nutrient utilization decreased livestock productivity ; .
The consumption of heavy metals through the feed can become a residue in meat and is dangerous if consumed by humans. Research by Sudiyono (2011) shows that cattle that consume heavy metals lead heavy metal contamination of meat to exceed the maximum limit, causing humans health problems. Sheep that grazing in landfill area contains heavy metals on lamb meat over the permissible limit . Consuming heavy metals causes damage to the brain, lungs, kidneys and liver function, blood composition, and other essential organs. Long-term exposure can lead to physical, muscular, and neurological degenerative processes that imitate diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, muscular dystrophy, hypertension, cancer, and may even cause death ; (Table 4 and 5).
CONCLUSION
Traditional market vegetable waste in the Special Region of Yogyakarta is potentially utilized as a ruminant feed based on the variety and chemical composition. Heavy metal contamination of Pb, Cu, and Hg in vegetable waste was still below the permissible limit for ruminant feed.
acknowledgements
Laboratory of Nutritional Biochemistry, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
authors contribution
Muhsin Al Anas designed, performed the experiment and wrote the manuscript. Himmatul Hasanah collected the samples and analyzed the data. Ali Agus supervised all the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.
References
• Adamse P, van der Fels-Klerx HJ, de Jong J (2017). Arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury in animal feed and feed materials; Trend analysis of monitoring results collected in the Netherlands. Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.18174/416680[CrossRef]
• AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. 20th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA.
• Bakshi MPS, Wadhwa M, Makkar HPS (2016). Waste to worth: Vegetable wastes as animal feed. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 11: 1 – 26. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201611012[CrossRef]
• Cahyari K, Sahroni A (2015). Effect concentration of Chili pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and Tabasco pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) on biogas production from organic waste. J. Bahan Alam Terbarukan 4: 8 – 15.
• Ezeldin I, Massaad O, Omer SA (2016). Evaluation of some vegetable wastes as feedstuff for ruminants. Int. J. Sci. Res. 5: 628 – 631. https://doi.org/10.21275/v5i3.NOV161789[CrossRef]
• Fitriana PR, Akbarillah HT, Supratman JWR, Limun K, Fax BT (2017). Quality of the nutrition of Setaria spacellata grass harvested based on cutting intervals. J. Sain Peternak. Indonesia. 12: 444 – 453. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.12.4.444-453[CrossRef]
• Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, USA.
• Haryani H, Norlindawati AP, Norfadzrin F, Aswanimiyuni A, Azman A (2018). Yield and nutritive values of six Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars at different cutting age. Malaysian J. Vet. Res. 9: 6 – 12.
• Hina B, Rizwani GH, Naseem S (2011). Determination of toxic metals in some herbal drugs through atomic absorption spectroscopy. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 24: 353 – 358.
• Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN (2014). Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 7: 60 – 72. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0009[CrossRef]
• Latif A, Bilal M, Asghar M, Azeem M, Ahmad MI, Abbas A, Ahmad MZ, Shahzad T (2018). Heavy metal accumulation in vegetables and assessment of their potential health risk. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 5: 1000234. https://doi.org/10.4172/2380-2391.1000234[CrossRef]
• Mahgoub O, Kadim IT, Eltahir Y, Al-Lawatia S, Al-Ismail AM (2020). Nutritional value of vegetable wastes as livestock feed. Sultan Qaboos Univ. J. Sci. [SQUJS] 23: 78 – 84. https://doi.org/10.24200/squjs.vol23iss2pp78-84[CrossRef]
• Marounek M, Joch M (2014). Effects of heavy metals and arsenate on the Ovine rumen fermentation in vitro. Agric. Trop. Subtrop. 47: 106 – 108. https://doi.org/10.2478/ats-2014-0014[CrossRef]
• Mudgal V, Madaan N, Mudgal A, Singh RB, Mishra S (2010). Effect of toxic metals on human health. Open Nutraceuticals J. 3: 94– 99. https://doi.org/10.2174/18763960010030100094[CrossRef]
• Mudhoo A, Kumar S (2013). Effects of heavy metals as stress factors on anaerobic digestion processes and biogas production from biomass. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10: 1383 – 1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0167-y[CrossRef]
• National Research Council (1985). Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
• Onakpa MM, Njan AA, Kalu OC (2018). A review of heavy metal contamination of food crops in Nigeria. Ann. Glob. Heal. 84: 488 – 494. https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2314[CrossRef]
• Rahayu P, Munawaroh IS, Elok K (2016). Comparison of heavy metal residues on sheep that grazing in landfill area before and after elimination process. Pages 319–326 in Proceedings of International Seminar on Livestock Production and Veterinary Technology 2016. https://doi.org/10.14334/Proc.Intsem.LPVT-2016-p.319-326[CrossRef]
• Reis LSLS, Pardo PE, Camargos AS, Oba E (2010). Mineral element and heavy metal poisoning in animals. J. Med. Med. Sci. 1: 560 – 579.
• Retnani Y, Saenab A, Taryati (2014). Vegetable waste as wafer feed for increasing productivity of sheep. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 8: 24 – 28. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajas.2014.24.28[CrossRef]
• Ruzaidy NIM, Amid A (2020). Heavy metal contamination in vegetables and its detection: A review. Sci. Herit. J. 4: 01 – 05. https://doi.org/10.26480/gws.01.2020.01.05[CrossRef]
• Statistics Indonesia (2019). Market and Trade Center Distribution By Classifications 2019. Available at https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/173/1875/1/sebaran-pasar-dan-pusat-perdagangan-menurut-klasifikasi.html (verified 2 February 2021).
• Sudiyono S (2011). Efforts of elimination of residual heavy metals in beef cattle from the waste disposal site locations with conventional maintenance. Sains Peternakan. 9(1): 1 – 7.
• Wadhwa, M., and S. P. M. Bakshi. 2013. Utilization of fruit and vegetable wastes as livestock feed and as substrates for generation of other value-added products (HPS Makkar, Ed.). FAO, Bangkok.
• Yue ZB, Yu HQ, Wang ZL (2007). Anaerobic digestion of cattail with rumen culture in the presence of heavy metals. Bioresour. Technol. 98: 781 – 786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.03.017[CrossRef]
• Zhou H, Yang WT, Zhou X, Liu L, Gu JF, Wang WL, Zou JL, Tian T, Peng PQ, Liao BH (2016). Accumulation of heavy metals in vegetable species planted in contaminated soils and the health risk assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 13: 289 – 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030289[CrossRef]