Short Communication · Volume 53, Issue 6, 16 October 2021 · Open Access
Length-Weight Relationship of Four Fish Species from Liujiang River, China
· · · ·
Affiliations & Notes ⌄
- 1Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Guangzhou 510380, China , * Corresponding author: liyuefei815@163.com
Article Info ⌄
- Journal:
- Pakistan Journal of Zoology
- Published:
- 16 October 2021

From the article
- In this present study, four species belonging to Cyprinidae family were collected, and the length and weight data used to analyze length-weight relationships.
- Descriptive statistics and estimated LWR parameters are given in Table I. The numbers of individual fish specimens varied from 13 to 47 (Table I).
- New maximum standard lengths for Ptychidio longibarbus was presented in this paper, and the LWRs for two species: Bangana decora and Ptychidio longibarbus is reported for the first time.
- In conclusion, this study provides basic biological information on LWRs for four fish species that will be useful for fishery management and conservation in Liujiang River.
Selected from the article's own text.
Abstract
Materials and methods
According to the fish breeding seasonal pattern, the investigations were carried out twice in July and December 2018 in Liujiang River. Fishes were collected from local fish markets that using various fishing gears such as drifting gillnets, castnets and shrimp cages. Specimens were identified to species level according to Chen (1998), Zhou et al. (2005), Zhang (2016) and Zheng (1989). Fish were measured for standard length (SL) to the nearest 1mm and total weight (TW) to the nearest 0.1 g. All scientific names, authors and years were checked against FISHBASE (www.fishbase.org). The length-weight relationship was established using linear regression analysis, W vs. L (natural logarithms-transformed): ln W = ln a + b ln L; where, W is total weight (TW g), L is standard length (SL cm), a is the intercept and b is the slope . The power of the relationship was calculated r2 (coefficient of determination). Within species, log-log plots were constructed to remove outliers. The 95% confidence limits for b (CL 95%) were calculated to determine if the hypothetical value of isometry fell within these limits . In all cases, a significance level (a) of 5% was adopted. All statistical analysis was performed in the software R 3.6.3.
Results
In this present study, four species belonging to Cyprinidae family were collected, and the length and weight data used to analyze length-weight relationships. Descriptive statistics and estimated LWR parameters are given in Table I. The numbers of individual fish specimens varied from 13 to 47 (Table I). The r2 values ranged from 0.901 to 0.996; values of b varied from 3.041 (Spinibarbus hollandi) to 3.367 (Ptychidio longibarbus), and all species except for Ptychidio longibarbus fell within the range 2.5<b<3.5 recommended by Froese (2006). Intercept value (a) ranged between 0.008861 for Distoechodon tumirostris and 0.02018 for Spinibarbus hollandi.
Table I.- Descriptive statistics and length-weight relationship parameters for four fish species from Liujiang River, China.
| Family | Species | N | SL range (cm) | TW range (g) | Length-weight relationships (LWR) | ||||||
| Min | Max | Min | Max | a | b | r2 | a CL 95% | b CL 95% | |||
| Cyprinidae | Spinibarbus hollandi Oshima, 1919 | 43 | 6.0 | 32.2 | 4.2 | 771.4 | 0.02018 | 3.041 | 0.996 | 0.01708-0.02384 | 2.969-3.114 |
| Distoechodon tumirostris Peters, 1881 | 47 | 5.8 | 34.5 | 2.0 | 903 | 0.008861 | 3.238 | 0.988 | 0.006757-0.01162 | 3.133-3.343 | |
| Bangana decora Peters, 1881* | 13 | 7.6 | 24.8 | 12.2 | 640.0 | 0.01266 | 3.298 | 0.975 | 0.004990-0.03213 | 2.961-3.636 | |
| Ptychidio longibarbus Fang, 1981* | 14 | 10 | 19.5 | 27.6 | 230 | 0.01133 | 3.367 | 0.901 | 0.002227-0.05762 | 2.751-3.984 | |
N, number of individuals; SL range, standard length range; TW range, total weight range; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; a, intercept; b, slope; CL, confidence limits; r2, coefficient of determination. Bold, maximum standard lengths exceeding those in FISHBASE; *No LWR reference in FishBase.
Discussion
For studying relationship between length and weight of fishes is widely considered to be an important way to understand fish growth and reproduction . The LWRs of four species in Liujiang were highly significant, with r2 values > 0.9. The values of parameter b remained within the expected range of 2.5-3.5 . The difference of b-values might be related with several factors, such as species, gonad maturity, season, or environmental conditions .
The numbers of some fish species examined in the present study is relative small. For example, Bangana decora and Ptychidio longibarbus only 13 and 14 individuals were collected, which because of its limited suitable habitats. Population of four fish species is relatively scarce in Liujiang River, China, and there were no available data of LWRs for two of them in FishBase . New maximum standard lengths for Ptychidio longibarbus was presented in this paper, and the LWRs for two species: Bangana decora and Ptychidio longibarbus is reported for the first time.
In conclusion, this study provides basic biological information on LWRs for four fish species that will be useful for fishery management and conservation in Liujiang River.
Acknowledgements
Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Fishery Resources and Environment in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Pearl River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs provided support for the investigation. And this study was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0900903) and Pearl river fishery resources investigation and evaluation innovation team project (2020TD10, 2020ZJTD-04).
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Chen, Y.Y., 1998. Fauna Sinica, Osteichthyes, Cypriniformes II. Science Press, Beijing, China.
- Froese, R., 2006. J. appl. Ichthyol., 22: 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x[CrossRef]
- Froese, R. and Pauly, D., 2019. FishBase, version 06/2019. World Wide Web electronic publication. Retrieved from https://www.fishbase.org
- Kimmerera, W., Aventa, S.R., Bollensa, S.M., Feyrerb, F., Grimaldob, L.F., Moylec, P.B., Nobrigaa, M. and Visintainera, T., 2005. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 134: 481-495.
- Le Cren, E.D., 1951. J. Anim. Ecol., 20: 201-219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540[CrossRef]
- Li, L., Wei, Q.W., Wu, J.M., Xie, X., Ren, L. and Du, H., 2015. J. appl. Ichthyol., 31: 242-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12622[CrossRef]
- Lleonart, J., Salat, J. and Torres, G.J., 2000. J. Theoret. Biol., 205: 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2043[CrossRef]
- Yin, M.C., 1995. Fish ecology. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, China.
- Zhang, C.G., 2016. Species diversity and distribution of inland fishes in China. Science Press, Beijing, China.
- Zheng, C.Y., 1989. Fishes in Pearl River. Science Press, Beijing, China.
- Zhou, J. and Zhang, C.G., 2005. Freshwater fishes of Guangxi, China, 2nd edition. Guangxi People’s Publishing House, Nanning, China.
Services
Article usage statistics
Loading…
