ResearchersLinks

Research Article · Volume 55, Issue 4, 23 June 2023 · Open Access

In Silico Analysis of Genome Wide Non-Synonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Indigenous Cattle Breeds of Pakistan

· · · · · · · ·

Affiliations & Notes ⌄
  1. 1National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Park Road, Islamabad, Pakistan 2Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Park Road, Islamabad, Pakistan 3Animal Biotechnology Program, Animal Sciences Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Park Road, Islamabad, Pakistan * Corresponding author: mrkhan@PARC.gov.pk
  2. 2naeemriaz@parc.gov.pk
Article Info ⌄
Journal:
Pakistan Journal of Zoology
Published:
23 June 2023

From the article

  • In this study, we investigated whole genome sequence data of four different purpose cattle breeds in Pakistan (Cholistani, Sahiwal, Bhagnari and Red Sindhi) to identify genetic variations which lead toward deleterious effect on protein structure and functions.
  • Analysis of missense variations revealed several genes with deleterious variation, involved in different biological and cellular functions.
  • Go enrichment analysis revealed that genes harboring deleterious variations are significantly enriched in important biological processes, such as metabolic processes, development, transport, and homeostasis processes.
  • The findings of this study can further be used as significant resource for further research on genomic characteristics to find variations in economically important traits and to develop precise genomic tools for cow breeding.

Selected from the article's own text.

Abstract

Genomic selection programs for yield enhancement and disease resistance have become a reality with the availability of highly detailed genomic information. This information is critical to highlight genetic polymorphisms related with economically important traits including milk and meat yield, development, and resistance against diseases. In this present study, our main objective was to identify the deleterious SNPs and their associated genes which possibly disrupt protein’s structure and function, as well as lead to genetic disease. We performed genome wide reference-based sequence alignment and functional annotation to identify deleterious non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) in cattle breeds of Pakistan. For this purpose, genomic data of four different purpose cattle breeds including Bhagnari, Cholistani, Sahiwal and Red Sindhi was analyzed. Comparison with taurine reference genome ARS-UCD.1.2.99 discovered 29,032,662 genomic variations of which 25,469,157 were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 3,563,505 were Insertion/Deletions (InDels). Functional annotation identifies 122,943 missense SNPs that may possibly affect economically important traits. Using sequence and structure based computational tools SIFT, we identified 154 deleterious variants in 134 genes. Gene enrichment highlighted the presence of these genes in different biological processes including developmental, signaling, transport, metabolic and homeostasis. These findings are useful resource for further exploration into the molecular processes associated with these variances.

INTRODUCTION

Livestock have traditionally played important part in development of human societies for a long time. According to a rough estimate, livestock supports the livelihoods of approximately 0.6 billion farmers in underdeveloped nations . Domestication of cattle has a major role in development of a country’s agriculture economy. They contribute more than milk, meat, fiber skin and fuel productions. Based on their physical appearances nearly 800 cattle breeds are divided into two categories, Bos taurus (taurine) and Bos indicus (indicine) . Beside many other reported differences, the appearance of a hump over the shoulders is one of the major phenotypic characteristics used to distinguish indicine breeds form taurine breeds . Indicine cattle grow in tropical and subtropical climates such as Africa, Southeast Asia, Brazil, northern Australia, southern China, and sections of the United States thanks to its physiological characteristics. Taurine, on the other hand, is typically found in more developed European countries, North America, and Australia, where it has a greater metabolic rate and dietary requirements. There are collectively 35 recognized cattle breeds in Pakistan and India which make considerable contribution to the agriculture economy. After goats, cows are the second most common animal species in Pakistan with an estimated 51.5 million animals , accounting for 3.2% of world cattle population . According to environmental conditions, most cattle breeds are created as drought breeds like Bhagnari, while Red Sindhi and Sahiwal are milk breeds and Tharparkar, Achai, Gabrali, and Cholistani are dual-purpose cattle breeds .

The process of natural and human driven selection has changed the cattle genotypes leading to diverse genetic and phenotypic profiles, and adaptation to temperature and tropical environments ; . Since the completion of the taurine cattle genome , thousand bull genome project , the worldwide bovine genome sequencing, and the HapMap project , a considerable number of genetic variants including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and InDels (Insertions/ Deletions) that have been recorded in a publicly available database ; ; ; ; .

Due to the advancements and cheap cost of next-generation sequencing (NGS), it is now feasible to simultaneously generate sequence data and estimate SNP allele frequencies in a range of reference populations . Whole genome SNP genotyping analysis detected genomic regions targeted by selection, which, for example, contain immune and environmental adaptation related genes. This has opened new doors for studying the genetic variation and processes which help in adaptation to different biogeographic regions ; . SNPs are the most prevalent type of genetic variation that are stable, have a low mutation rate, are inherited in a mendelian manner, and are relatively inexpensive to genotype . As a result, they are routinely utilized as biomarkers in genetic research. Advances in bioinformatics and statistical tools have also improved our understanding of demographic evolution, the possible role of genomic structural variations, adaptation during domestication and selection, and the biological functions of these genomic variations in livestock breed ; ; .

Regardless of these recent breakthroughs, there is a severe gap in whole-genome investigations of Asian cow breeds and European bovine breeds that are commonly employed for meat and dairy production ; . In this study, we analyzed the whole genome sequence data for four different purpose cattle breeds of Pakistan. Our main goal was to identify and analyze the missense variants resulting from nsSNP and predict their effect on resulting amino acid sequence, their structure, functionality, and stability. Missense variations not only modify the tertiary structure of proteins, but also lead to formation of deleterious phenotypes. Results of this study will be useful in furthering research into the genetic pathways underpinning features of interest in Indian cattle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data collection

The whole genome sequences of Pakistani Bos indicus cattle samples included in this study were recently made available in public domain . Sequence data is available in China National GenBank Sequence Archive under project accession number CNP0000189. Total genomic DNA was extracted form whole blood (10 mL) samples and were sequenced using BGISEQ-500. For this study, we choose four different purpose breeds including Sahiwal (CNS0014619), Bhagnari (CNS0014606), Cholistani (CNS0014604), and Red Sindhi (CNS0014620).

Reads alignment and mapping

Quality check of sequence reads was performed using fast QC tool to identify low quality reads and adapter sequences. Raw sequences were first subjected to filtering process to identify and remove low quality reads and adapters using trimmomatic software . Burrows-Wheeler Alignment (BWA) algorithm was used with default parameters to create index files for reference genome ARS-UCD1.2 Btau5.0.1Y accessed from the 1000 Bull Genome project resources . Short reads of each selected cattle sample were mapped to reference genome using BWA with option “bwa-mem”. SAM files generated as result of alignment were converted to their binary equivalent (BAM) files and sorted using SAM tools . PCR duplicates were removed using Picard tools “Mark Duplicate” command line utility from aligned reads (Picard tools by broad institute https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Base Quality Score Recalibration (BQSR) was performed on mapped reads to resolve high or low base quality scores estimation. Final BAM files were used for downstream variant calling.

Variant calling

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) along with insertion and deletions mutations (InDels) were identified using “Haplotype Caller” tool of genome analysis toolkit (GATK) which performs local de-novo assembly of haplotypes in genomic variation regions . GATK was used according to guidelines of 1000 Bull Genome Project available at http://www.1000bullgenomes.com/doco/1000bullsGATK3.8pipelineSpecifications_Run8_Revision 20191101.docx . GATK “Select Variants” mode was used to separate SNPs and InDels into separate files. All variants including SNPs and InDels were discovered as difference from the reference genome ARS-UCD1.2 sequence. To remove the false positive calls, variants were filtered with GATK “Variant FIltration” argument using hard-filters with the following exclusion criteria: (1) quality by depth - QD<2.0; (2) Fisher Strand test - FS>60.0; (3) root mean square of the mapping quality score - MQ < 40.0; (4) and SOR > 9.0. SNPs and INDELS of autosomal chromosomes + X were left after filtration process.

Annotation of variations

Genetic variants were annotated using SnpEff program with annotation database ARS-UCD1.2.99 . SnpEff software assigns each SNPs and InDels to a functional class and provide several fields of information describing the affected transcripts and proteins, if applicable. SNPs and InDels were assigned to different functional classes including exonic, intronic, intergenic, splice site acceptor, splice site donor, splice site region, downstream, upstream, UTR 3 prime and UTR 5 prime region. InDels were also allocated to the in-frame deletion and insertion, disruptive in-frame deletion, and insertion functional classes whereas functional classes stop lost, stop retained, initiator codon were assigned to SNPs only. Variants were categorized into missense, nonsense, and silent variants. Missense or non-synonymous single base pair substitution result in amino acid substitution which affects the proteins phenotypically and functionally.

Detection of deleterious SNPs and go enrichment

SIFT tool was used to predicts the genes with tolerated and deleterious SNPs from the missense variants. This program identifies the tolerated and deleterious SNPs to predict the impact of amino acid substitution on phenotypic and functional alterations in protein molecules. SIFT program to identifies tolerance score (TI) for each in range from 0.0 to 1.0. The SIFT score ≤ 0.05 labels the non-synonymous variant as deleterious to protein function ; . Gene enrichment analysis was performed to identify over-represented biological processes using genes with deleterious SNPs. This gene lists comprising was submitted to the ClueGO , a Cytoscape plug-in that combines Gene Ontology and KEGG pathways to produce a well-organized GO/ pathway annotation network, allowing researchers to see if these genes are linked to key pathways.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Sequence data and alignment

Genomic sequences data of 4 different cattle breeds of Pakistan was analyzed which included dairy breeds Sahiwal and Red Sindhi, dual purpose breed Cholistani and drought tolerant breed Bhagnari. Individual sample sequence reads ranged from 754,986,078 to 1,605,207,524. Mapping of each sample to cattle reference genome ARS-UCD1.2 using BWA software yielded 83% to 99% alignment or sample reads (Table I). SAM alignment files were sorted and then converted to their binary format (BAM) files. Flow diagram depicts the bioinformatics analysis performed on the new generation sequence data (Fig. 1).

Identification and annotation of variants

Alignment BAM files (including Bhagnari, Sahiwal, Cholistani and Red Sindhi) were pooled together to perform variant calling. Total ~25.46 M SNPs and ~3.56 M InDels were identified in the 29 autosomes and X chromosome against bovine reference genome ARS-UCD1.2 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S1). Among the 3,563,505 InDels, 1,87,986 were deletions. Number of SNPs present per individual samples were 13.19, 18.96, 15.63, and 15.21 million in Bhagnari, Cholistani, Sahiwal, and Red Sindhi, respectively. The transition to transversion (Ts/Tv) ratio was pretty much similar across the samples, 2.27 in Bhagnari, 2.3 in Cholistani, 2.28 in Sahiwal and 2.3 in Red-Sindhi (Table II). This is indicative of high quality of our SNPs identified. Number of SNPs and Indels depend on the length of chromosomes. Out of total SNPs and InDels, only 104152 (0.41%) SNPs and 409 (0.01%) InDels matched to previously reported variations in dbSNP build 150.

Table I. Number of raw reads and aligned reads in each sample.

Breed

Sample ID

Read length (bp)

Total reads

Mapped reads

Total reads aligned %

Unmapped reads

Cholistani

CNS0014604

50

1,262,644,830

1,238,899,685

98.11

23,745,145

Bhagnari

CNS0014606

50

754,986,078

633,661,223

83.93

121,324,855

Sahiwal

CNS0014619

50

1,605,207,524

1,594,140,047

99.31

11,067,477

Red Sindhi

CNS0014620

50

1,579,398,030

1,568,961,018

99.33

10,437,012

Table II. Summary statistics of variants in each sample.

SNP Stats

Bhagnari

Cholistani

Sahiwal

Red Sindhi

Total SNPs

13,196,027

18,967,415

15,634,144

15,215,012

Total InDels

1563914

2263706

2028795

1850518

Singleton SNPs

1376894

3039282

2163090

1960479

Het/Hom

0.53

2.21

0.77

0.75

Ts/Tv Ratio

2.27

2.3

2.28

2.3

Genome wide annotation of variants

Variant sets including SNPs and InDels were functionally annotated them to their attribute and genes using SnpEff tool. In our dataset of total SNPs identified, 16,750,695 (41.53%) were discovered in between genes. 1,785,969 (4.43%) SNPs were in thousand base pair (bp) upstream region of genes and 1,826,857 (4.53%) were in thousand base-pair downstream region of genes (Table II). Due to distinct isoforms or overlapping genes, multiple functional effects were identified when compared the total number of SNPs and InDels used for variant. 58,970,854 transitions and 25,313,817 transversions were detected with Ts/Tv ratio of 2.3296 in SNPs. SnpEff identified 2,909 high impact (disruptive), 122,494 moderate and 239,647 low impact SNPs in all sequenced samples (Supplementary Table SII). Functional Annotation of InDels predicted the presence of 2,331,013 (40.78%) and 2,779,680 (48.63%) InDels in intergenic and intronic regions, respectively. Moreover, 285,210 (5.00%) and 273, 913 (4.80%) indels were located within thousand base pair upstream and downstream genic regions (Table III). 5,155 high impact (disruptive), 2,359 moderate and 5,730 low impact InDels were identified in all sequenced samples (Supplementary Table SII). SnpEff categorized the identified SNPs as missense, nonsense and silent according to their functional class (Table V). Missense variations (nsSNPs) can possibly cause amino acid substitutions which phenotypically and functionally effect important traits of cattle. For further downstream analysis, missense variants were carried forward.

Identification and enrichment of functional SNPs in coding region

Phenotypic effects of the missense variants were identified by SIFT tool. SIFT uses sequence homology-based approach to characterize the effect of amino acid substitution on protein function. SIFT analysis predicted 154 deleterious missense variants overlapping 134 genes in coding sequence regions with a score between 0.00-0.04. Moreover, 325 missense variants in coding sequence regions were predicted as tolerated (Table VI and Supplementary Table S3). Even though a small number of deleterious SNPs were identified, all these variants overlapped protein coding genes. Gene list comprising deleterious SNPs was submitted in ClueGO to identify the functional gene ontology (GO) biological processes (BP). Gene ontology (GO) network is represented in Figure 3. Enrichment analysis revealed presence of these genes in several biological processes. Highlighted biological processes in gene interaction network included lipid transport (GO:0010876), transmembrane transport (GO:0055085), response to organic cyclic compounds (GO:0014070), response to endoplasmic reticulum stress (GO:0034976), negative regulation of transport (GO:0051051), detection of chemical stimulus (GO:0009593), skin development (GO:0043588), endomembrane system organization (GO:0010256), cytoskeleton organization (GO:0007010), response to growth factors (GO:0070848) and DNA conformation change (GO:0071103). List of all biological pathways and genes related is present in Supplementary Table S3.

CONCLUSION

In silico approach to characterize genetic variations can assist us in predicting the consequences of mutations and explain their affecting role in biological mechanisms. In this study, we investigated whole genome sequence data of four different purpose cattle breeds in Pakistan (Cholistani, Sahiwal, Bhagnari and Red Sindhi) to identify genetic variations which lead toward deleterious effect on protein structure and functions. This analysis led to the discovery of 25,469,157 SNPs and 3,563,505 InDels in these breeds.

Table III. Annotation of SNPs.

SNPs

Count

Percent

3 prime UTR variant

121,002

0.30%

5 prime UTR premature start codon gain variant

6,728

0.02%

5 prime UTR variant

43,109

0.11%

Downstream gene variant

1,826,857

4.53%

Initiator codon variant

18

0%

Intergenic region

16,750,695

41.53%

Intron variant

19,403,911

48.11%

Missense variant

122,494

0.30%

Noncoding transcript exon variant

27,818

0.07%

Splice acceptor variant

388

0.00%

Splice donor variant

684

0.00%

Splice region variant

36,706

0.09%

Start lost

239

0.00%

Stop gained

1,410

0.00%

Stop lost

192

0%

Stop retained variant

136

0%

Synonymous variant

202,961

0.50%

Upstream gene variant

1,785,969

4.43%

Table IV. Annotation of InDels.

InDels

Count

Percent

3 prime UTR variant

22,164

0.39%

5 prime UTR variant

6,639

0.12%

Bidirectional gene fusion

15

0%

Conservative in frame deletion

497

0.01%

Conservative in frame insertion

509

0.01%

Disruptive in frame deletion

867

0.02%

Disruptive in frame insertion

546

0.01%

Downstream gene variant

285,213

4.99%

Frameshift variant

4,395

0.08%

Gene fusion

15

0%

Intergenic region

2,331,013

40.78%

Intragenic variant

3

0%

Intron variant

2,779,680

48.63%

Noncoding transcript exon variant

3,020

0.05%

Noncoding transcript variant

86

0.00%

Splice acceptor variant

439

0.01%

Splice donor variant

432

0.01%

Splice region variant

6,277

0.11%

Start lost

36

0.00%

Start retained variant

5

0%

Stop gained

55

0.00%

Stop lost

54

0.00%

Stop retained variant

7

0%

Transcript ablation

14

0%

Upstream gene variant

273,913

4.79%

Table V. Number of effects by functional class.

SNPs

Count

Percent

MISSENSE

122,943

37.55%

NONSENSE

1,410

0.43%

SILENT

203,097

62.02%

Table VI. Result of nsSNP analysis by SIFT.

SIFT Prediction

Count

Total

648

CDS Region

516

Non-Coding

132

Nonsynonymous

344

Synonymous

155

Stop-Gain

13

Deleterious

154

Tolerated

325

Numerous SNPs, InDels and genes were found that have not been annotated yet. We annotated each variant’s possible functional role, allowing us to find numerous functionally significant candidate variants. Functional annotation revealed 122,943 missense (non-synonymous) SNPs in all samples 2,909 and 5,155 high impact (disruptive) SNPs and InDels in were also predicted by annotation. Analysis of missense variations revealed several genes with deleterious variation, involved in different biological and cellular functions. Go enrichment analysis revealed that genes harboring deleterious variations are significantly enriched in important biological processes, such as metabolic processes, development, transport, and homeostasis processes. Because this whole-genome sequencing study used just one animal of each breed, more research is needed to understand the exact dynamics of each gene–trait combination. The findings of this study can further be used as significant resource for further research on genomic characteristics to find variations in economically important traits and to develop precise genomic tools for cow breeding.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are highly grateful to Director NIGAB and NARC for providing all the necessary facilities.

Supplementary material

There is supplementary material associated with this article. Access the material online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20211221081250

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1..

Bioinformatics workflow for analyzing whole genome sequencing data.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2..

Number of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distribution by chromosome (A) and number of insertion/deletions (InDels) distribution by chromosome (B).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3..

ClueGO gene ontology analysis of 134 genes with deleterious nsSNP identified in all samples. ClueGO identifies the enriched go terms and visualizes them in grouped annotation network. This network shows the relationship between the terms based on the similarity of their associated genes. Each node represents a gene ontology term and the associated genes.

References

  1. Andrews, S., 2010. Fastqc: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  2. Bindea, G., Mlecnik, B., Hackl, H., Charoentong, P., Tosolini, M., Kirilovsky, A., Fridman, W.H., Pagès, F., Trajanoski, Z. and Galon, J., 2009. Cluego: A cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics, 25: 1091-1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101[CrossRef]
  3. Bolger, A.M., Lohse, M. and Usadel, B., 2014. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30: 2114-2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170[CrossRef]
  4. Choi, J.W., Liao, X., Stothard, P., Chung, W.H., Jeon, H.J., Miller, S.P., Choi, S.Y., Lee, J.K., Yang, B. and Lee, K.T., 2014. Whole-genome analyses of korean native and holstein cattle breeds by massively parallel sequencing. PLoS One, 9: e101127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101127[CrossRef]
  5. Cingolani, P., Platts, A., Wang, L.L., Coon, M., Nguyen, T., Wang, L., Land, S.J., Lu, X. and Ruden, D.M., 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, snpeff: Snps in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly, 6: 80-92. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19695[CrossRef]
  6. Eck, S.H., Benet-Pagès, A., Flisikowski, K., Meitinger, T., Fries, R. and Strom, T.M., 2009. Whole genome sequencing of a single bos taurus animal for single nucleotide polymorphism discovery. Genome Biol., 10: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-8-r82[CrossRef]
  7. Elsik, C.G., Tellam, R.L., Worley, K.C., Gibbs, R.A., Muzny, D.M., Weinstock, G.M., Adelson, D.L., Eichler, E.E. and Elnitski, L., 2009. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: A window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science, 324: 522-528.
  8. Felius, M., Beerling, M.L., Buchanan, D.S., Theunissen, B., Koolmees, P.A. and Lenstra, J.A., 2014. On the history of cattle genetic resources. Diversity, 6: 705-750. https://doi.org/10.3390/d6040705[CrossRef]
  9. Felius, M., Koolmees, P.A., Theunissen, B., Consortium, E.C.G.D. and Lenstra, J.A., 2011. On the breeds of cattle historic and current classifications. Diversity, 3: 660-692. https://doi.org/10.3390/d3040660[CrossRef]
  10. Fernandes Júnior, G.A., de Oliveira, H.N., Carvalheiro, R., Cardoso, D.F., Fonseca, L.F.S., Ventura, R.V., and de Albuquerque, L.G., 2020. Whole-genome sequencing provides new insights into genetic mechanisms of tropical adaptation in nellore (Bos primigenius indicus). Sci. Rep., 10: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66272-7[CrossRef]
  11. Finance Division, 2021. Pakistan ecnomic survey. Accessed on 15 November, 2021.
  12. Gibbs, R.A., Taylor, J.F., Van Tassell, C.P., Barendse, W., Eversole, K.A., Gill, C.A., Green, R.D., Hamernik, D.L., and Kappes, S.M., 2009. Genome-wide survey of snp variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds. Science, 324: 528-532. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167936[CrossRef]
  13. Gutenkunst, R.N., Hernandez, R.D., Williamson, S.H. and Bustamante, C.D., 2009. Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional snp frequency data. PLoS Genet., 5: e1000695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000695[CrossRef]
  14. Hayes, B.J. and Daetwyler, H.D., 2019. 1000 bull genomes project to map simple and complex genetic traits in cattle: Applications and outcomes. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci., 7: 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115024[CrossRef]
  15. Iqbal, N., Liu, X., Yang, T., Huang, Z., Hanif, Q., Asif, M., Khan, Q.M. and Mansoor, S., 2019. Genomic variants identified from whole-genome resequencing of indicine cattle breeds from pakistan. PLoS One, 14: e0215065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215065[CrossRef]
  16. Iso-Touru, T., Tapio, M., Vilkki, J., Kiseleva, T., Ammosov, I., Ivanova, Z., Popov, R., Ozerov, M. and Kantanen, J., 2016. Genetic diversity and genomic signatures of selection among cattle breeds from siberia, eastern and northern europe. Anim. Genet., 47: 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12473[CrossRef]
  17. Jacob, K.K., Radhika, G. and Aravindakshan, T., 2020. An in silico evaluation of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms of mastitis resistance genes in cattle. Anim. Biotechnol., 31: 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2018.1524770[CrossRef]
  18. Kawahara-Miki, R., Tsuda, K., Shiwa, Y., Arai-Kichise, Y., Matsumoto, T., Kanesaki, Y., Oda, S.I., Ebihara, S., Yajima, S. and Yoshikawa, H., 2011. Whole-genome resequencing shows numerous genes with nonsynonymous snps in the japanese native cattle kuchinoshima-ushi. BMC Genom., 12: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-103[CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, S., Banks, T.W. and Cloutier, S., 2012. Snp discovery through next-generation sequencing and its applications. Int. J. Pl. Genom., 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/831460[CrossRef]
  20. Li, H. and Durbin, R., 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 25: 1754-1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324[CrossRef]
  21. Li, H., and Durbin, R., 2011. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature, 475: 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10231[CrossRef]
  22. Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G. and Durbin, R., 2009. The sequence alignment/ map format and samtools. Bioinformatics, 25: 2078-2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352[CrossRef]
  23. MacHugh, D.E., Shriver, M.D., Loftus, R.T., Cunningham, P. and Bradley, D.G., 1997. Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics, 146: 1071-1086. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/146.3.1071[CrossRef]
  24. McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., and Daly, M., 2010. The genome analysis toolkit: A mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res., 20: 1297-1303. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110[CrossRef]
  25. Ng, P.C. and Henikoff, S., 2003. Sift: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucl. Acids Res., 31: 3812-3814. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg509[CrossRef]
  26. Porto-Neto, L.R., Sonstegard, T.S., Liu, G.E., Bickhart, D.M., Da Silva, M.V., Machado, M.A., Utsunomiya, Y.T., Garcia, J.F., Gondro, C. and Van Tassell, C.P., 2013. Genomic divergence of zebu and taurine cattle identified through high-density snp genotyping. BMC Genom., 14: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-876[CrossRef]
  27. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N.S., Wang, J.T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B. and Ideker, T., 2003. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res., 13: 2498-2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303[CrossRef]
  28. Sherry, S.T., Ward, M.H., Kholodov, M., Baker, J., Phan, L., Smigielski, E.M. and Sirotkin, K., 2001. Dbsnp: The ncbi database of genetic variation. Nucl. Acids Res., 29: 308-311. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.1.308[CrossRef]
  29. Sim, N.L., Kumar, P., Hu, J., Henikoff, S., Schneider, G. and Ng, P.C., 2012. Sift web server: Predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucl. Acids Res., 40: W452-W457. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks539[CrossRef]
  30. Singh, U., Deb, R., Alyethodi, R.R., Alex, R., Kumar, S., Chakraborty, S., Dhama, K. and Sharma, A., 2014. Molecular markers and their applications in cattle genetic research: A review. Biomark. Genom. Med., 6: 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bgm.2014.03.001[CrossRef]
  31. Snelling, W.M., Casas, E., Stone, R.T., Keele, J.W., Harhay, G.P., Bennett, G.L. and Smith, T.P., 2005. Linkage mapping bovine est-based snp. BMC Genom., 6: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-74[CrossRef]
  32. Thornton, P.K., Jones, P.G., Owiyo, T., Kruska, R.L., Herrero, M.T., Kristjanson, P.M., Notenbaert, A.M.O., Bekele, N. and Omolo, A., 2006. Mapping climate vulnerability and poverty in Africa.
  33. Vaser, R., Adusumalli, S., Leng, S.N., Sikic, M. and Ng, P.C., 2016. Sift missense predictions for genomes. Nat. Protoc., 11: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.123[CrossRef]
  34. Weldenegodguad, M., Popov, R., Pokharel, K., Ammosov, I., Ming, Y., Ivanova, Z. and Kantanen, J., 2019. Whole-genome sequencing of three native cattle breeds originating from the northernmost cattle farming regions. Front. Genet., 9: 728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00728[CrossRef]
  35. Zeder, M.A., Bradley, D.G., Smith, B.D. and Emshwiller, E., 2006. Documenting domestication: New genetic and archaeological paradigms. Univ of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007[CrossRef]

Supplementary material

Services

Article usage statistics

Loading…

In Silico Analysis of Genome Wide Non-Synonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Indigenous Cattle Breeds of Pakistan · ResearchersLinks