Phosphorus (P), foliar zinc (Zn) and its time of application plays an important role in crop productivity. To study its effect on maize, field experiment was conducted at Fodder and Forage Crops Section Harichand- Charsadda, Pakistan. The field experiment was conducted on 7 July 2021. Two levels of P (90 and 120 kg ha-1) and three levels of Zn (0 i.e., water spray only, 2.5 and 5 kg ha-1) were applied at three growth stages, full at vegetative stage (V6), full at reproductive stage (R2) and ½ at V6 and ½ at R2 stage along-with an overall control were used in the experiment. Randomized complete block design was used with three replications. The studied parameters were significantly affected by P, Zn and AT. Ear length (17.8 cm), ear weight (115.8 g), grains ear-1 (390) and thousand grains weight (257 g) had significantly affected when 120 kg P ha-1 was applied. Similarly, ear length (18.4 cm), ear weight (129.6 g), grains ear-1 (407) and thousand grains weight (258.33 g) were significantly affected in plots treated at the rate of 5 kg ha-1 with Zn. In case of growth stages, Zn applied half at vegetative and half at reproductive stages significantly enhanced the ear length (18.2 cm), ear weight (127.4 g), grain ear-1(391) and thousand grains weight (255.5 g). It is concluded from the experiment that application of 120 kg P ha-1 significantly improved ear length, ear weight, grains per ear and thousand grain weight. In case of foliar application of 5 kg Zn ha-1 improved ear length, ear weight, grains per ear and thousand grain weight of cob. Similarly, in case of Zn application stages, ½ at vegetative and ½ reproductive stage will improve productivity of maize crop. Therefore,120 kg P ha-1, 5 kg Zn ha-1 along with its application timing ½ at vegetative and ½ reproductive stage is recommended for the agro climatic conditions of Peshawar.
Research Article · Volume 38, Issue 3, 14 July 2022 · Open Access
Efficacy of Soil Applied Phosphorus and Foliar Zinc Application on Different Growth Stages to Improve Productivity of Maize (Zea mays)
· · · · · · · ·
Affiliations & Notes ⌄
- 1Livestock Research and Dairy Development Department, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar, Pakistan
- 2Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan
- 3Institute of Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering (IBGE), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan
- 4Department of Agriculture, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
- 5Senior Scientific Officer, Crop Science Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan. *Correspondence | Sajid Ali, Livestock Research and Dairy Development Department, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar, Pakistan
- 6Email: drsajidali692@gmail.com
Article Info ⌄
- Journal:
- Sarhad Journal of Agriculture
- Published:
- 14 July 2022

Abstract
Introduction
Fertilizers play an important role in crop production and also enhanced quality of crop . Balanced fertilizers are very important because it’s improved and enhances plant development and also increases yield . Among the essential nutrients, phosphorus (P) is the second essential nutrient. Phosphorus (P) is important nutrient in the cropping system of agriculture ; ; . It plays a role in crop development and in its metabolism . Phosphorus is the part of nucleic acids, structural proteins and of enzymes . After nitrogen, phosphorus increases yield of crop . Most of the cereal and vegetable crops require phosphorus in large quantity . It has two different forms in soil i.e. H2PO4-1 and HPO4-2 and plant takes it in these two forms. The absorption of HPO4-2is very rapid and faster as compare to H2PO4-1 . Application of phosphorus give strength to straw of cereal crop and as a result crop lodging decreases. It also increases resistance to many diseases. It plays a crucial role in cell division, nucleus formation, helps in DNA and RNA formation (Kolodiazhnyiet al., 2021). Deficiency of phosphorus limits development and growth of plant . Phosphorus decreases yield in maize crop when applied in low amount .
Micro-nutrients though are as important as macro-nutrients . However, as compared to macronutrients, micronutrients are required in very small amount. Generally, in most cases, both the plants and soils have very small amounts of micro-nutrients . Micro-nutrients play a key role in plant growth and its development, improve crop phenology and also involve in various physiological processes (Hassan et al., 2019). Similarly, in case of micro-nutrients, Zinc (Zn) is an important micro-nutrient and plays a key role in plants . Zn is necessary for biosynthesis of chlorophyll . In general, Zn has major role in activating enzyme, proteins synthesis, revival and oxidation reactions and carbohydrates metabolism . The deficiency of Zn may lead to photosynthesis decline and destruction of RNA, decreased protein synthesis, carbohydrates solution and thus affecting performance and quality of crop . Foliar application of both Zn and Fe also enhances the phenological development and yield component of wheat crop . Application of Zn enhances height of maize crop when applied at split doses. Foliar Zn also significantly enhances size of maize leaf .
Materials and Methods
Field experiment
The experiment entitled “efficacy of soil applied phosphorus and foliar zinc application on different growth stages to improve productivity of maize (Zea mays) was performed at Fodder and Forage crops section Harichand, Charsadda, Khyber Pakthunkhwa; Pakistan. The field experiment was conducted on 7 July 2021. The experiment comprised of the following factors along with their respective levels. Two levels of P (90 and 120 kg ha-1) were applied at the time of sowing and three levels of Zn (0 i.e., water spray only, 2.5 and 5 kg ha-1) were applied at three growth stages i.e., full at vegetative stage (V6), full at reproductive stage (R2) and½ at V6 and ½ at R2 stage along with an overall control were used in the experiment. The experiment was conducted in randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatment combinations of all the three factors along with a control were randomly allotted to the experimental plots in each block. Plot size was 4.9 × 4.0 m. Jalal variety was used for sowing. Planting was made on flat beds in rows spaced 0.70m. For application of Zn, 10% solution of ZnSO4.H2O was prepared. Keeping in view the treatments and volume to wet the subplot area completely, the solution was further diluted with water. Control plots were sprayed with equivalent quantity of water. First irrigation was given on 19 July 2021after sowing and subsequent irrigation was adjusted according to the need of crop. For all the treatments, other agronomic practices were kept uniform.
Locality of the experimental site
The experimental field is placed at 34.020 N, 71.470 E and 331 m above the level of sea. The mean annual rainfall of the location is 360 mm. The mean maximum summer temperature is 40 oC and the mean minimum is 25 oC while in winter minimum mean temperature is 4 oC and mean maximum temperature is 18.34 oC.
Soil sample collection and laboratory analysis
The soil characteristics as evaluated in laboratory and classified the soil as texture silty clay loam having 51.3% silt, 40% clay and 8.7% sand, 14.4% CaCO3, 8.08 pH and having low organic matter of 0.58% g kg-1. Similarly, the mineral contents of soil were i.e. 0.21 ppm zinc, 66.38 ppm iron, 2.86 ppm nickel, 1.07 ppm lead, .085 ppm chromium and 0.937 ppm was copper.
Statistical analysis
The data noticed on different parameters was analyzed statistically according to the procedure relevant to randomized complete block design as described by little and Hills (1978). Least significant difference (LSD) test were used for mean separation when the F test was significant.
Results and Discussion
Ear length (cm)
Data of ear length showed in Table 1. Maximum ear length (17.8 cm) was noticed when 120 kg P ha-1was applied while minimum (16.8 cm) was noticed when 90 kg P ha-1was applied. The reason for increased of ear length of maize might be that phosphorus could translocate assimilation to ears has accrued and have been resulted in to increased ear length . Similarly, in case of Zn, maximum ear length (18.4 cm) was observed when 5 kg Zn ha-1was applied while minimum (16.1 cm) was noticed with water spray only. Ear length and weight increased with higher rate of Zn . In case of Zn application timing, maximum ear length (18.2 cm) was recorded when Zn was applied all at AT3 stage while minimum (16.5 cm) was noticed when applied all at AT1 stage.
Ear weight (g)
Data concerning ear weight are accessible in Table 2. Maximum ear weight (115.8 g) was noticed when 120 kg P ha-1was applied while minimum (109.4 g) was observed when 90 kg P ha-1was applied. Ear weight of maize crop increased with higher rate of phosphorus because phosphorus increases the amount of endosperm in grain . Similar in case of Zn, maximum ear weight (129.6 g) was noticed when 5 kg Zn ha-1was applied while minimum (113.4 g) was noticed with water spray only. Increase of ear weight is due to the heavier grain weight, because zinc provided adequate amount of carbohydrates to source. Therefore, ear weight increases with the application of Zn . In case of Zn application timing, maximum ear weight (127.4g) was shown when all Zn was applied at AT3 stage while minimum (111.4 g) was noticed with all at AT2 stage. In such away in case of P x AT interaction, the maximum ear weight (124.1 g) was noticed in plots when 120 kg P ha-1 and Zn applied half at V6 and half at R2 stage while minimum (97.9 g) was noticed in plot that received 90 kg P ha-1 and all Zn at AT2 stage.
Table 1: Ear length (cm) of maize as affected by phosphorus, foliar Zn and its application timing.
| Phosphorus (kg ha-1) | Zn (kg ha-1) application | Growth stages | Mean | ||
| V6 | R2 | 50% at V6 + 50% at R2 | |||
| 90 | 0 | 13.3 | 17.0 | 16.7 | 15.7 |
| 2.5 | 16.3 | 17.1 | 17.2 | 16.9 | |
| 5.0 | 17.5 | 17.3 | 18.8 | 17.9 | |
| 120 | 0 | 15.8 | 16.7 | 17.2 | 16.6 |
| 2.5 | 17.0 | 17.4 | 19.0 | 17.8 | |
| 5.0 | 19.0 | 17.3 | 20.3 | 18.9 | |
| - | 0 | 14.6 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 16.1 c |
| - | 2.5 | 16.7 | 17.2 | 18.1 | 17.3 b |
| - | 5.0 | 18.2 | 17.3 | 19.6 | 18.4 a |
| 90 | - | 15.7 | 17.1 | 17.6 | 16.8 b |
| 120 | - | 17.3 | 17.1 | 18.8 | 17.8 a |
| Mean | 16.5 b | 17.1 b | 18.2 a | ||
| Control | 13.0 b | ||||
| Rest | 17.3 a | ||||
Table 2: Ear weight (g) of maize as affected by phosphorus, foliar Zn and its application timing.
| Phosphorus (kg ha-1) | Zn (kg ha-1) Application | Growth stages | Mean | ||
| V6 | R2 | 50% at V6 + 50% at R2 | |||
| 90 | 0 | 93.0 | 101.0 | 117.3 | 103.8 |
| 2.5 | 110.3 | 96.7 | 110.3 | 105.8 | |
| 5.0 | 141.3 | 96.0 | 118.3 | 118.6 | |
| 120 | 0 | 107.3 | 118.0 | 143.7 | 123.0 |
| 2.5 | 111.3 | 129.0 | 143.3 | 127.9 | |
| 5.0 | 138.0 | 141.7 | 142.0 | 140.6 | |
| - | 0 | 100.2 | 109.5 | 130.5 | 113.4 b |
| - | 2.5 | 110.8 | 112.8 | 126.8 | 116.8 b |
| - | 5.0 | 139.7 | 118.8 | 130.2 | 129.6 a |
| 90 | - | 114.9 | 97.9 | 115.3 | 109.4 b |
| 120 | - | 119.7 | 103.6 | 124.1 | 115.8 a |
| Mean | 117.0 ab | 111.4 b | 127.4 a | ||
| Control | 94.3 b | ||||
| Rest | 119.9 a | ||||
V6: Vegetative stage leaf 6th; R2: reproductive stage.
Grains ear-1
Data concerning grains ear-1 are obtainable in Table 3. In case of P, maximum grains ear-1 (390) was shown when 120 kg P ha-1was applied while minimum (369) grains ear-1 was noticed when 90 kg P ha-1was applied. Phosphorus is responsible for the growth of root which directly affects the overall plant performance . It has also reported that grains per ear also increase with phosphorus fertilization . Similarly, in case of Zn, maximum grains ear-1 (407) was noticed when 5 kg Zn ha-1 was applied while minimum (353) was shown with water spray only. This is because that Zn is essential for pollen grain development and pollen viability; as a result, number of grains increases in ear (Sonal et al., 2022). In case of Zn application timing, maximum (391) was noticed when Zn was applied half at V6 and half at R2 stage while minimum (372) was noticed when all applied at AT2 stage.
Table 3: Grains ear-1 of maize as affected by phosphorus, foliar Zn and its application timing.
| Phosphorus (kg ha-1) | Zn (kg ha-1) application | Growth stages | Mean | ||
| V6 | R2 | 50% at V6 + 50% at R2 | |||
| 90 | 0 | 313.3 | 343.0 | 386.7 | 347.7 |
| 2.5 | 356.7 | 351.3 | 390.0 | 366.0 | |
| 5.0 | 416.7 | 381.3 | 382.7 | 393.6 | |
| 120 | 0 | 360.0 | 356.7 | 359.7 | 358.8 |
| 2.5 | 386.7 | 388.7 | 400.7 | 392.0 | |
| 5.0 | 414.7 | 416.7 | 430.3 | 420.6 | |
| - | 0 | 336.7 | 349.8 | 373.2 | 353.2 c |
| - | 2.5 | 371.7 | 370.0 | 395.3 | 379.0 b |
| - | 5.0 | 415.7 | 399.0 | 406.5 | 407.1 a |
| 90 | - | 362.2 | 358.6 | 386.4 | 369.1 b |
| 120 | - | 387.1 | 387.3 | 396.9 | 390.4 a |
| Mean | 374.7 b | 372.9 b | 391.7 a | ||
| Control | 341.0 b | ||||
| Rest | 379.8 a | ||||
V6: Vegetative stage leaf 6th; R2: reproductive stage.
Thousand grains weight (g)
Data regarding thousand grains weight are obtainable in Table 4. Statistical analysis of the data show that maximum thousand grains weight (257 g) was seen at 120 kg Pha-1and minimum (233.7 g) thousand grains weight were seen at 90 kg p ha-1 application. Heaviest grain weight with higher P level probably may be due to higher P translocation in to the fruiting area which results in highest grain weight. Increasing in P levels increased grain weight . Similarly, in case of Zn, highest (258.3 g) thousands grain weight was noticed when 5 kg Zn ha-1was applied while minimum (220.5 g) was noticed with water spray only. When the supply of carbohydrates to grain is high then the filling of grain will be high and as a result weight of kernels will be more . In case of Zn using timing, maximum thousands grain weight (255.5 g) was shown when Zn was applied half at V6 and half at R2 stage while minimum (228.6 g) was noticed when applied all at V6 stage.
Table 4: Thousand grains weight (g) of maize as affected by phosphorus, foliar Zn and its application timing.
| Phosphorus (kg ha-1) | Zn (kg ha-1) application | Growth stages | Mean | ||
| V6 | R2 | 50% at V6 + 50% at R2 | |||
| 90 | 0 | 195 | 208 | 203 | 202 |
| 2.5 | 200 | 220 | 253 | 224 | |
| 5.0 | 240 | 233 | 260 | 244 | |
| 120 | 0 | 206 | 250 | 260 | 238 |
| 2.5 | 250 | 266 | 263 | 260 | |
| 5.0 | 280 | 243 | 293 | 272 | |
| - | 0 | 200 | 229 | 231 | 220 b |
| - | 2.5 | 225 | 243 | 258 | 242 a |
| - | 5.0 | 260 | 238 | 276 | 258 a |
| 90 | - | 211 | 220 | 238 | 223 b |
| 120 | - | 245 | 253 | 272 | 257 a |
| Mean | 228 b | 236 b | 255 a | ||
| Control | 206 b | ||||
| Rest | 240 a | ||||
V6: Vegetative stage leaf 6th; R2: reproductive stage.
Conclusions and Recommendations
It is concluded from the experiment that application of 120 kg P ha-1 significantly improved ear length, ear weight, grains per ear and thousand grain weight. Similarly, foliar application of 5 kg Zn ha-1 improved ear length, ear weight, grains per ear and thousand grain weight of cob. In case of application timing of zinc, when applied ½ at vegetative and ½ reproductive stage will improve productivity of maize crop. Therefore,120 kg P ha-1, 5 kg Zn ha-1 along with its application timing ½ at vegetative and ½ reproductive stage is recommended for the agro climatic conditions of Peshawar.
Novelty Statement
This study conducted to find out the impact of phosphorus, Zinc and its application stages to improve maize yield.
Author’s Contribution
Sajid Ali: Carried out research and drafted the manuscript.
Shahen Shah: Provided technical guidelines
Muhammad Amin: Helped in data analysis
Asad Ali Khan: Helped in editing and draft improvement
Dawood Ahmad and Ikram Ullah: Helped results and discussion interpretation
Faiq Ahmad and Sajjad Khan: Helped in data collection
Sikandar Azam: Helped in format setting
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
- Adeyemi, O., R. Afshar, E. Jahanzad, M.L. Battaglia, Y. Luo, and A. Sadeghpour. 2020. Effect of wheat cover crop and split nitrogen application on corn yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy, 10: 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081081[CrossRef]
- Alamnie, A. and Misganew. 2021. Effects of organic amendments on phosphorus sorption characteristics of nitisols of Pawe district, Northwestern Ethiopia. Diss. Bahir Dar University, 2021.
- Ali, S., S. Shah and M. Arif. 2021. Agronomic biofortification with zinc and iron for the improvement of wheat phenology and yield. Sarhad J. of Agric., 37(3): 901-914. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2021/37.3.901.914[Full text][CrossRef]
- Amjadian, Elham, A. Zeinodini, and H. Dogan. 2021. Effect of fertilizer management systems on growth and balance of nutrients in wheat cultivation. Cent. Asian J. Plant Sci. Innov., 1.2(2021): 56-69.
- Bing, M., Y. Wang, T.H. Zhao, Q. Zhao, Y. San, and S.S. Xiao. 2022. Response of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentration and stoichiometry of plants and soils during a soybean growth season to O3 stress and straw return in Northeast China. Sci. Total Environ., pp. 153573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153573[CrossRef]
- Cengiz, K., M. Senbayram, N.A. Akram, M. Ashraf, M.N. Alyemeni, and P. Ahmad. 2020. Sulfur-enriched leonardite and humic acid soil amendments enhance tolerance to drought and phosphorus deficiency stress in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci. Rep., 10(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62669-6[CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, M., D. Chakraborty, P. Mondal, and P.R. Paul. 2021. Micronutrient deficiency stress in soils of India: Tackling it to alleviate hidden hunger. In soil science: Fundamentals to recent advances, pp. 801-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0917-6_40[CrossRef]
- El-Sobky, E.S.E., and A.I. Abdo. 2021. Efficacy of using biochar, phosphorous and nitrogen fertilizers for improving maize yield and nitrogen use efficiencies under alkali clay soil. J. Plant Nutr., 44(4): 467-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1845369[CrossRef]
- Guignard, M.S., A. Leitch, R. Acquisti, C., Eizaguirre, J.J. Elser, and D.O. Hessen. 2017. Impacts of nitrogen and phosphorus: From genomes to natural ecosystems and agriculture. Front. Ecol. Evol., 5: 70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00070[CrossRef]
- Hamza, Z.K., A.S. Hathout, G. Ostroff, E. Soto, B.A. Sabry, M.A. ashash, and S.E. Aly. 2022. Assessment of the protective effect of yeast cell wall β glucan encapsulating humic acid nanoparticles as an aflatoxin B1 adsorbent in vivo. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol., 36(1): 22941. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22941[CrossRef]
- Hassan, U., L. Mahmood, R. Tassaduq, C. Iqbal, A. Arshad, M. Abrar, M.M. Abrar, M.H. Rahman, M.A. Noor, A. Sher and S. Fahad. 2021. Linking plants functioning to adaptive responses under heat stress conditions: A mechanistic review. J. Plant Growth Regul., pp. 1-18.
- Hisham, A.A., H.Y. Ching, M.M. Rahman, K. Mat, and A.K. Zulhisyam. 2021. Effects of zinc on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated in a tropical acid soil using different application techniques. Earth Environ. Sci., 756(1): 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/756/1/012056[CrossRef]
- Hitha, S., V. Chandran and L. Mathew. 2021. Organic fertilizers as a route to controlled release of nutrients. Controlled release fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Acad. Press, 2021: 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819555-0.00013-3[CrossRef]
- Jake, C., I. Ortiz-Monasterio, D. Guerena, D.B. Lobell. 2022. Evaluating maize yield response to fertilizer and soil in Mexico using ground and satellite approaches. Field Crops Res., 276: 108393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108393[CrossRef]
- Juan, H., B. Ren, S. Dong, P. Liu, B. Zhao and J. Zhang. 2021. Poor development of spike differentiation triggered by lower photosynthesis and carbon partitioning reduces summer maize yield after waterlogging. Crop J., 2021.
- Kadyampakeni, D.M., and T. Chinyukwi. 2021. Are macronutrients and micronutrients therapeutic for restoring performance of trees affected by citrus greening? A discussion of current practices and future research opportunities. J. Plant Nutr., 44(19): 2949-2969. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1927079[CrossRef]
- Ketterings, Q., and K. Czymmek. 2020. Removal of phosphorus by field crops, agronomy fact sheet series; fact sheet #28; Nutrient Management Spear Program, Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA., (accessed on 25 July 2020).
- Kewei, Z., H. Liu, P. Tao and H. Chen. 2014. Comparative proteomic analyses provide new insights into low phosphorus stress responses in maize leaves. PLoS One, 9(5): 98215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098215[CrossRef]
- Khan, A., G. Lu, M. Ayaz, H. Zhang, R. Wang and F. Lv. 2018. Phosphorus efficiency, soil phosphorus dynamics and critical phosphorus level under long-term fertilization for single and double cropping systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 256: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.006[CrossRef]
- Kolodiazhnyi and I. Oleg. 2021. Phosphorus compounds of natural origin: Prebiotic, Stereochemistry, Application. Symmetry, 13(5): 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13050889[CrossRef]
- Liu, D.Y., W. Zhang, Y.M. Liu, X.P. Chen and C.Q. Zou. 2020. Soil application of zinc fertilizer increases maize yield by enhancing the kernel number and kernel weight of inferior grains. Front. Plant Sci., 11: 188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00188[CrossRef]
- Natasha, N., M. Shahid, I. Bibi, J. Iqbal, S. Khalid, B. Murtaza, H.F. Bakhat, A.B. Farooq, M. Amjad, H.M. Hammad and N.K. Niazi. 2022. Zinc in soil plant human system: A data-analysis review. Sci. Total Environ., 808: 152024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152024[CrossRef]
- Nazia, H., S. Irshad, M.S. Saddiq, S. Bashir, S. Khan, M.A. Wahid, R.R. Khan, and M. Yousra. 2019. Potential of zinc seed treatment in improving stand establishment, phenology, yield and grain biofortification of wheat. J. Plant Nutr., 42(14): 1676-1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1630429[CrossRef]
- Perkins, A.C., and J.P. Lynch. 2021. Increased seminal root number associated with domestication improves nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition in maize seedlings. Ann. Bot., 128(4): 453-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab074[CrossRef]
- Raheela, R., M. Asif, I. Cakmak and L. Ozturk. 2021. Differences in uptake and translocation of foliar-applied Zn in maize and wheat. Plant Soil, 462(1): 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04867-3[CrossRef]
- Roberts, T.L., and A.E. Johnston. 2015. Phosphorus use efficiency and management in agriculture. Res. Cons. Rec., 105: 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.013[CrossRef]
- Sonal, K., G. Verma, and S.S. Dhaliwal. 2021. Zinc phasing and fertilization effects on soil properties and some agromorphological parameters in maize wheat cropping system. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 4: 1-10.
- Wenxin, L., Z. Zhang, X. Wen, Y. Liao, and Y. Liu. 2017. Effect of non-structural carbohydrate accumulation in the stem pre-anthesis on grain filling of wheat inferior grain. Field Crops Res., 211: 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.016[CrossRef]
- Yadav, H., R. Fatima, A. Sharma and S. Mathur. 2017. Enhancement of applicability of rock phosphate in alkaline soils by organic compost. Appl. Soil Ecol., 113: 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.02.004[CrossRef]
- Yao, Q., Z. Li, Y. Song, S.J. Wright, X. Guo, S.G. Tringe and C. Pan. 2018. Community proteogenomics reveals the systemic impact of phosphorus availability on microbial functions in tropical soil. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2(3): 499-509. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0463-5[CrossRef]
Services
Article usage statistics
Loading…
