ResearchersLinks

Research Article · Volume 6, Issue 1, 28 March 2020 · Open Access

Effect of Nutrition During the Last Stages of Pregnancy on Lamb Birth Weight and Growth Performance in Balkhi Ewes

· · ·

Affiliations & Notes ⌄
  1. 1Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
  2. 2Research Officer at Veterinary Research and Disease Investigation Center Abbottabad, Pakistan
  3. 3Veterinary Officer at Remount Veterinary Farm Corps
  4. 4Research Officer at Directorate of Livestock and Research and Development, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. dr.msohail@ymail.com
Article Info ⌄
Journal:
Veterinary Sciences: Research and Reviews
Published:
28 March 2020

Abstract

The present study was designed to examine the weight gain and growth performance of Balkhi lambs and pregnant Balkhi ewes at The University of Agriculture, Peshawar Dairy Farm Malakandair. Balkhi sheeps (n=30) were purchased from the market. They were kept for ninety days including 10 days for adaptation. Animals were divided into three groups such that each group contain ten animals i.e. group A (NRC recommended diet), group B (4% more CP and 2% more TDN), and group C (conventional grazing). Weekly body weight changes were recorded on digital balance and body condition score was calculated (1-5) on weekly basis. Bodily changes of ewes were significantly higher in group B (1.73±0.13 kg/week) followed by group A (1.22±0.07 kg/week) and group C (0.85±0.03 kg/week). The similar pattern was found for birth weight of lambs (group B > group A > group C). Least growth rate of lambs was observed in group C (0.46±0.02) followed by group A (0.75±0.042) and B (0.94±0.06). The effect of different level of diets was significant (P<0.05) on body condition score (BCS) of pregnant ewe before and after lambing. It was concluded that higher Crude Protein (CP) and Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) supplementation to pregnant ewes improves the birth weight, growth rate of lambs and body condition scoring of ewes. 

Introduction

Pakistan is an agricultural country. Livestock is sub-sector of agriculture. Livestock having share of 60.54 percent in agriculture and 11.22 percent in GDP, recorded the growth at 4.0 percent against the target of 3.8 percent during the Financial Year 2018-19. About 59759 thousand tons of meat was produced, of which 40 thousand tones was contributed from sheep meat (Economic Survey of Pakistan, 2018-19).

Sheep and goats are mostly owned by rural subsistence smallholder producers and are used for milk, meat and wool production. They are mostly landless and graze their flocks on communal ranges. Usually they live in sedentary or transhumant system of living; however, nomads are also found (Ahmed, S. 2007). Nomadic herders native to the tribal belt of Pakistan and Afghanistan, solely depend for livelihood upon their flocks, are responsible for conservation and development (breed improvement) of the present day Balkhi sheep. There are more than 30 sheep breeds in Pakistan . The annual population of goat and sheep is increasing at the rate of 4.5% and 1.2% respectively (Davendra, 2000). The population of sheep is 30.9 millions. (Economic Survey of Pakistan, 2018-19). Balkhi is a heavy muttonous fat-tailed sheep breed, originated in the continental climate of Balkh area in Afghanistan and are found in the adjacent areas of central valley of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province of Pakistan and primarily raised for mutton production . Small ruminants can play important role in fulfillment of daily protein requirement of humans .

Nutrition has a direct effect on reproductive performance . Nourishment affect total life span yield of sheep by influencing body size. The last six weeks of gestation is the most crucial phase in ewe food. 70 per cent of fetal growth occurs at this time . If protein level is low in feed of pregnant ewes, it will result in low birth rates and underweight lambs .

Keeping in view the above facts the current study was carried out in order to investigate the effect of feeding regimes on pregnant Balkhi Sheeps and birth weight, survival rate and growth performance of lambs in order to facilitate the farmers of the area.

Materials and Methods

This study was carried out at The University of Agriculture Peshawar Dairy Farm Malakandair. Total 30 advance pregnant Balkhi sheep were selected for this study. Experiment lasted for 90 days including 10 days for adaptation period.

Housing and feeding

Ewes were kept under closed housing system. The ewes were dewormed and vaccinated as per standard protocol. Before feeding the experimental animals, either conventional or with treatments the composition (nutritional value) of the diets were determined by proximate analysis according to Association of Official Analytical Chemists, . Experiment was started 30 days before lambing and continued till 50 days after postnatal period (Munoz et al., 2009).

Experimental animals and dietary treatments

All the sheep were divided into three groups randomly (each group consist of 3 animals) named A, B and C. The sheep were assigned three different dietary treatments in which one group was NRC recommended level, other group had 4%more CP and 2% TDN and third group was given conventional nomads people feeding and that was grazing. The design of the experiment was completely randomized design. The Design used for this experiment was Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Concentrate ration were formulated from available concentrates ingredients in dairy farm. While formulating the ration changes were made in concentrate ingredients and their level.

Table 1: Proximate composition of the concentrate ration.

Components Concentrates
A (NRC level) B (above NRC)
Dry matter(%) 91.65 91.42
Crude protein (%) 12 16
Ether extract (%) 5.32 5.78
Crude fiber (%) 14.26 11.81
Ash (%) 5.21 4.99
Nitrogen free extract (%) 46.1 47.3

Metabolizable energy

(KJ/kg)

2.32 2.38

Table 2: Mean weight gain in ewes for 3 weeks before lambing treated with different diets.

  Weight gain (Kg) Mean± SE  
Group Week 3 Week2 Week1 Mean
1

0.97b±0.07

1.20a,b±0.21

1.45b±0.03

1.21c±0.06

2

1.66a±0.26

1.59a±0.10

1.92a±0.00

1.72a±0.13

3

0.72b±0.15

0.81b±0.09

0.94c±0.16

0.85c±0.03

Mean with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different at α=0.05.

Weighing of the animals: Weight of the animals was recorded at morning with empty gut using electrical balance. Weekly data were collected before and after parturition and weight change during nursing and lactation were recorded till the last week of experiment.

Body Condition Scoring (BCS): Scoring was performed by feeling the fat deposition i.e. the level of muscling over and around vertebrae in the loin region. Spinous and transverse process of loin vertebrae were felt along with central spinal column and used to assess an individual body condition score (1-5) as described by .

Statistical analysis: Data was arranged in Microsoft excel 2007 and were analyzed by using the general

Table 3: Effect of diets on weekly body weight (Kg) gain of lambs.

Group Weight gain (Kg) Mean± SE Mean
Week1 Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Week7
1

0.95a±.0

1.02a±.01

0.95a±.01

0.90a±.02

0.93a±.02

0.93a±.01

0.92a±.02

0.94a±.04

2

1.18a±0.01

1.19a±0.11

1.17b±0.02

1.16b±0.02

1.15b±0.03

1.11b±0.02

1.11b±0.01

1.1b±0.06

3

0.44b±.02

0.48b±.02

0.45c±0.02

0.50c±0.01

0.45c±0.02

0.49c±0.02

0.44c±0.03

0.45c±0.02

Mean with different superscript in the same column are significantly different at α=0.05

linear model (GLM) SAS-2000 ANOVA Jason Roy (2007). Significant level was considered at P<0.05.

Results and Discussion

The study was performed to evaluate the performance of pregnant ewes and their new born lambs when subjected to three different types of feeding. The results obtained are elaborated in the following sub-headings.

Effect of diets on ewe weight before lambing

There was no significant difference between group-1 and group-3 in the start of week (Table 2). Overall the weight gain is increasing in all groups but group-2 mean value (1.72±0.13) is greater followed by group 1(0.94±0.16) and group 3(0.85±0.03). Highest mean weight gain in 3rd week before lambing was in group 2(1.6633±0.26) followed by group 1(0.9767±0.07) and group 3(0.7233±0.15).

As animal entered in the 2nd week their weight gain values shows marked increase. In week 1 before lambing group B shows statistically significant difference (1.9200±0.00) kg/week in body weight gain followed by treatment A (1.4567±0.03) and C (0.9433±0.16).

Lamb birth weight

NRC recommended group get more weight (3.6b±.158) than keeping just on grazing. Mean values of birth weights for all three groups shows that there is difference in conventional and NRC recommended group but significant difference is present in (4.20a±.113) above NRC recommended group. Analysis of variance shows significant effect of different feeding on lamb birth weight (P value =0.004).

Lamb weekly growth

There is no significant difference (P>0.05) on growth of lamb in group-1 and group-2 in the first week as shown in Table 3. However, significant difference was present among all the groups after 1st week. In week 2 and 3, average mean values of weight gain is numerically increasing in all groups but higher significance (<0.05) is present in group 2 compared to group 1 and group 3. In week 4, group B shows statistically significant difference (1.160±0.02) kg/week in body weight gain followed by group 1 (0.900±.020) and 3(0.5000±0.0173). For week 5 group B shows statistically significant difference (1.156 ±0.035) in body weight gain followed by group1 (0.933±.020) and 3 (0.4500c±0.0231) and this group was continued for week 6 and 7.

Overall group 2 weight gain (1.1±0.0612) is significantly higher (P<0.05) followed by group1 (0.9448±.0426) and then group 3 (0.4578±0.0250). ANOVA shows significant difference among three different types of diets.

Body condition scoring (BCS) of ewes

BCS before lambing: No significant difference was found in group 1 and 3 at beginning of experiment as shown in Table 4, but difference is significant for group 2 (3.35±.0.0473). Highest body condition scoring (3.38±.0593) was observed in group 2 followed by group 1(3.14a±.0593) and then group 3 (2.95±.034). Significant difference (P<0.05) is present in BCS of pregnant ewe before lambing.

Table 4: Body condition scoring of ewes before lambing.

Group Beginnings BCS Lambing BCS Mean
1

3.11b±.05

3.18a±.06

3.14a±.05

2

3.35a±.0.04

3.42b±.06

3.38b±.05

3

2.93b±.02

2.97c±.01

2.95c±.03

Mean with different alphabetic superscript in the same column are significantly different at<0.05

BCS after lambing: Huge reduction in body condition scoring was observed in the ewes that were just on conventional grazing and no supplementary ration was allowed (1.4700b±.000) (Table 5). Highest lost in body condition scoring (1.4700b±.000) was observed in treatment 3 followed by treatment 1 (2.6567a±0.0395) and then treatment 2 (2.745a). Analysis of variance showed significant effect (P<0.05) of different level of diets on BCS of pregnant ewe after lambing.

Table 5: Body condition score of ewes before and after lambing.

Group Week 1 Week2 Week3 Mean
1

2.72a±0.04

2.65 a ±0.04

2.64a±0.04

2.65a±0.03

2

3.01b±0.03

2.99 b±0.04

2.96b±0.06

2.7a±.04

3

1.68c±0.04

1.55 c±0.09

1.45c±0-14

1.47b±.00

Mean with different superscript in the same column are significantly different at α=0.05

The findings of the study are discussed in this chapter. Significant difference in weight gain was observed in NRC recommended feed group (P<0.05). Radunz et al. (2011) found that sheep given (25.3% on DM basis CP) had greater BW gain (P < 0.001) than (14.3% on DM basis CP) group. In late gestation when increase protein diet and same energy diet is given ewes increased their live body weight ; . These studies coincides with our results that greater the gain in BW of that pregnant ewes which had been fed more protein diet.

In agreement with our studies Dawson et al. (2005) found positive relationship of increase herbage and concentrate allowance with live weight gain. Kerslake et al. (2008) found no satisfactory result of weight gain by protein supplementation when enough roughage was provided.

Present study revealed that different level of feeding regime has their effect on birth weight of lambs. Ewes that had been given above than NRC requirement diet had more birth weight (4.200a±.113) than that just kept on conventional grazing (3.200b±.104). Previous studies demonstrate that low nutrition in pregnancy negatively effects on growth of the foetus , 2008).

Furthermore low nutrition in late gestation badly affects the lambs metabolic control postpartum, up to 18 weeks of age and the ewes live weight during late pregnancy .

Meyer (2010) found that different nutritional plane of pregnant ewes and their effect was studied on offspring BW. He found positive relationship of good nutrition with live body weights of lambs. Sormunen-Cristiana and Jauhiainen (2001) studied that there is positive effect of more protein and energy levels in late pregnancy on growth rate of lambs during the first six weeks of their life. The findings of Thomson et al. (2004) suggested that heavier lambs at birth are heavier till 12 weeks of age. Results of Kerslake (2008) revealed that concentrate supplementation within the height of 6 cm increased birth weight of lambs from 4.8 to 5.3 kg and concentrate addition increased lamb growth by 30 g/day. Nørgaard et al. (2008) identified decrease in colostrum output with feed restriction.

Study showed that ewes maintain body condition with adequate or supplemental CP in late gestation ewe diets. Similar to our results, Munozn et al. (2009) found an increase in BW and BCS in ewes before parturition and his result showed that ewes supplemented with CP during late gestation gain more weight. Late pregnancy supplementation directly effects on Ewe weight and BCS, . Ewes lose their body weight before than body condition if controlled feed is given. .

Present study revealed that different level of feeding regime has their effect on birth weight of lambs. Ewes that had been given supplemented protein ration (group B) than NRC requirement diet had significantly higher birth weight (4.2±.113) than those just kept on conventional grazing (3.2±.1). Previous studies showed effect of insufficient nutrition in pregnancy on growth of the fetus ; . Both ewe weight and BCS can be affected by supplementation of the ewe in late pregnancy .

Conclusions and Recommendations

Findings of the study revealed that daily feeding supplementary concentrates having high energy and protein concentration to pregnant ewes along with grazing improve birth weight and growth rate in terms of live body weight gain and body condition scoring.

Authors Contribution

SM conceived the idea of this study. SM and SA executed the research trial and data collection. MS and MN analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed and coordinated in finalization of this manuscript.

References

  1. Ahmad, S. 2007. Performance and phylogenetic position of Kari sheep in Pakistan. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet. Univ. Agric. Faisalabad, Pak.
  2. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th eds. Association of official analytical chemists, Washington, DC.
  3. Dawson, L.E.R., Carson, A.F., Kilpatrick, D.J. and Laidlaw, A.S., 2005. Effect of herbage allowance and concentrate food level offered to ewes in late pregnancy on ewe and lamb performance. Anim. Sci., (81): 413-421. https://doi.org/10.1079/ASC41950413[CrossRef]
  4. Devendra, C., 2000. Strategies for improved feed utilization and ruminant production systems in the Asian region. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci., pp. 51-58.
  5. Engel, C.L., Patterson, H.H. and Perry, G., 2008. A. Effect of dried corn distillers grains plus solubles compared with soybean hulls,in late gestation diets, on animal and reproductive performance. J. Anim. Sci., (86): 1697–170. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0206[CrossRef]
  6. Frutos, P., Buratovich, O., Giráldez, F.J., Mantecón, A.R. and Wright, I.A., 1998. Effects on maternal and foetal traits of feeding supplement to grazing pregnant ewes. Anim. Sci., (66): 667-673. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800009231[CrossRef]
  7. Gardner, D.S., Buttery, P.J. and Symonds, M.E., 2007. Factors affecting birth weight in sheep: Maternal environment. Reprod. (1)133: 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-06-0042[CrossRef]
  8. GOP. 2006. Pakistan livestock census 2006; 2006. Available from: http://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/pakistan-livestockcensus- 2006.
  9. Husted, S.M., Nielsen, M.O., Blache, D. and Ingvartsen, K.L., 2008. Glucose homeostasis and metabolic adaption in the pregnant and lactating sheep are affected by the level of nutrition previously provided during her late fetal life. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. (34): 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2007.12.002[CrossRef]
  10. Husted, S.M., Nielsen, M.O., Tygesen, A., Kiani, A., Blache, D. and Ingvartsen, K.L., 2007. Programming of intermediate metabolism in young lambs affected by late gestational maternal undernourishment. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. (293): 548-557. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00441.2006[CrossRef]
  11. Ibrahim, M., Ahmad, S., Swati, Z.A. and Ullah, G., 2011. Fat-tailed sheep production systems in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43(7): 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9867-4[CrossRef]
  12. Kerslake, J.I., Kenyon, P.R., Morris, S.T., Stafford, K.J. and Morel, P.C.H., 2008. Effect of concentrate supplement and sward height on twin bearing ewe body condition and the performance of their offspring. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. (48): 988-994. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08041[CrossRef]
  13. Khan, M.S., Khan, M.A., Ahmad, S. and Mahmood, S., 2007. Genetic resources and diversity in Pakistani sheep. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 9(6): 941–944.
  14. Kenyon, P.R., Maloney, S.K. and Blache, D., 2014. Review of sheep body condition score in relation to production characteristics. N. Z. J. Agric. Res., 57: 38-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2013.857698[CrossRef]
  15. Jason Roy (2007) SAS for Mixed Models, Second Edition. R. C.Littell, G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, R. D. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenberger. J. Biopharmaceut. Stat., 17:2, 363-365. “https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400601001600” 10.1080/10543400601001600[CrossRef]
  16. Martin, J.L., Vonnahme, K.A., Adams, D.C., Lardy, G.P. and Funston, R.N., 2007. Effects of dam nutrition on growth and reproductive performance of heifers calves. J. Anim. Sci. (85): 841-847. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-337[CrossRef]
  17. Meyer, A.M., Reed, J.J., Neville, T.L., Taylor, J.B., Hammer, C.J., Reynolds, L.P., Redmer, D.A., Vonnahme, K.A. and Caton, J.S., 2010. Effects of plane of nutrition and selenium supply during gestation on ewe and neonatal offspring performance, body composition, and serum selenium. J. Anim. Sci., (88): 1786-800. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2435[CrossRef]
  18. Ibrahim, M., Ahmad, S., Durrani, I.S., Iqbal, A., Munir, I. and Swati, Z.A., 2017. Genetic polymorphism and bottleneck analysis of Balkhi, Hashtnagri and Michni sheep populations using microsatellite markers, Anim. Biotechnol., (29): 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2017.1366340[CrossRef]
  19. Muñoz, C., Carson, A., McCoy, M., Dawson, L., O’Connell, Niamh, and Gordon, A., 2008. Nutritonal status of adult ewes during early and mid-pregnancy. 1. Effects of plane of nutrition on ewe reproduction and offspring performance to weaning. Anim. Int. J. Anim. Biosci., 2: 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107001048[CrossRef]
  20. Muñoz, C., Carson, A.F., McCoy, M.A., Dawson, L.E.R., Wylie, A.R.G. and Gordon, A.W., 2009. Effects of plane of nutrition of ewes in early and mid-pregnancy on performance of the offspring: Female reproduction and male carcass characteristics. Anim. Sci., 11(87): 3647-3655. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1842[CrossRef]
  21. Nørgaard, J.V., Nielsen, M.O., Theil, P.K., Sørensen, M.T., Safayi, S. and Sejrsen, K., 2008. Development of mammary glands of fat sheep submitted to restricted feeding during late pregnancy. Small Rumin. Res., (76): 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.11.001[CrossRef]
  22. Ocak, N., Cam, M.A. and Kuran, M., 2005. The effect of high dietary protein levels during late gestation on colostrum yield and lamb survival rate in singleton-bearing ewes. Small Rumin. Res., (56): 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.02.014[CrossRef]
  23. Pakistan Economic Survey. 2018-19. GoP, Minist. Natl. Food Secur. Res. pp. 46.
  24. Radunz, A.E., Fluharty, F.L., Zerby, H.N. and Loerch, S.C., 2011. Winter-feeding systems for gestating sheep I. Effects on pre- and postpartum ewe performance and lamb progeny preweaning performance. J. Anim. Sci., (89): 467-477. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3035[CrossRef]
  25. Sormunen-Cristiana, R. and Jauhiainen, L., 2001. Comparison of hay and silage for pregnant and lactating Finnish Landrace ewes. Small Rumin. Res., (39): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00167-X[CrossRef]
  26. Thomson, B.C., Muir P.D., Smith, N.B. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 2004; (66): 233–237.
  27. Vinoles, C., Meikle, A. and Martin, G.B., 2008. Short-term nutritional treatments grazing legumes or feeding concentrates increase prolificacy in Corriedale ewes. J. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 113(1-4): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.05.079[CrossRef]
  28. Wu, G., Bazer, F.W., Wallace, J.M. and Spencer, T.E., 2006. Board-Invited Review: Intrauterine growth retardation: Implications for the animal sciences. J. Anim. Sci., (84): 2316-2337. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-156[CrossRef]

Services

Article usage statistics

Loading…