ResearchersLinks

Short Communication · Volume 54, Issue 4, 26 April 2022 · Open Access

Cholecalciferol and Formic Acid Synergistically Enhance Digestive Enzymes Activity and Bone Mineralization in Ctenopharyngodon idella

· · · · · ·

Affiliations & Notes ⌄
  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Tropical Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China 2Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan 3Department of Zoology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan 4Department of Zoology, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan 5Department of Zoology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan * Correspo
Article Info ⌄
Journal:
Pakistan Journal of Zoology
Published:
26 April 2022

From the article

  • The fish group fed with formic acid significant showed increase in calcium, magnesium and potassium; however vitamin D3 significantly increased the iron and manganese contents (µg/g) in the bones of C. idella fingerlings (Table II).
  • The amylase and protease activities were maximum in intestine of fish fed with formic acid followed by fornic acid: vitamin D3 (500:2), vitamin D3 (control diet).
  • The observed formic acid and vitamin D3 (interactions) were synergistically enhanced bone mineralization of phosphorous (13.13±0.04a), sodium (2.11±0.03a), copper (14.3±0.04) and also showed enhanced results for the activity of amylase (2.75±0.00), protease(0.95±0.01) and lipase (0.30±0.01).

Selected from the article's own text.

Abstract

This study was planned to determine intestinal digestive enzymes activity and bone mineralization of Ctenopharyngodon idella. Four type food were prepared by using formic acid (%) and vitamin D3 (IU/Kg) in experiment viz, FD1, FD2, FD3 and FD4, respectively. Fish fed with formic acid showed considerable increase in calcium, magnesium potassium, however vitamin D3considerably increase iron and manganese contents (µg/g) in the bones of C. idella. Amylase and protease activity was maximum in fish intestine fed with formic acid followed by fornic acid × vitamin D3, vitamin D3 = control diet. Activity of lipase enzyme was reduced by formic acid supplementation as well as vitamin D3. The observed formic acid and vitamin D3 (interactions) were synergistically bone mineralization of phosphorus, sodium, copper and also showed positive result for the activity of amylase, protease and lipase. Finally, formic acid and vitamin D3improves bone mineralization and digestive enzymes activity in the C. idella.

Materials and methods

The present research work was conducted in Fisheries research Farmstead, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. Four earthen ponds (19m×6m×1.5 m) were covered well with mesh net to avoid numerous undesired animals to enter in the specific ponds. Ponds were filled by tube well water. C. idella (grass carp) (n=25) was added to each pond after measuring the weight and length. In each earthen pond, inorganic compost containing urea and superphosphate was added on weekly basis for one month. During this one month duration, no fertilizer was added to ponds. Fish were then nourished with about 2 % body weight of fishes twice a day. In each pond, water level was kept constant throughout the study period. After duration of fourteen days, sampling was done and feed ratio was set accordingly. Finally, after feeding duration of 90 days, the fishes were harvested.

Four different experimental diets (FD1, FD2, FD3 and FD4) comprising formic acid (%) and vitamin D3 (IU/Kg) by following the levels 0, 0; 2, 0; 0, 500 and 500, 2, respectively. The time period for the whole experiment was about three months. For the formulation of experimental diets, instruments like, cereal grinding machine (FFC-45, JIMO, China) was used for the purpose of screening (0.05 mm) as well as grinding the diet ingredients. After electrically grinding the ingredients, mixture of mineral samples of fish oil and vitamins were added. For better texturing of dough, good quantity of watter was used for pellet construction, and also the experimental extruder (Model SYSLG30-IV) was used for formulation of pellets (3.5 mm). Pellets were dried with about 10% of moisture contents and stored at 20°C during the whole nourishing trial and then packed in plastic bags.

For bone mineralization, bone samples were digested in boiling nitric acid and perchloric acid mixture (3:1) for the estimation of minerals. Calicum, magnesium, zinc, iron, copper and manganese were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Hitachi Polarized Zeeman AAS, Z-8200, Japan) after appropriate dilution. Phosphorus content was analyzed at 720 nm wavelength using UV/VIS spectrophotometer (U-2001, Hitachi). Flame-photometer (Jenway PEP-7, UK) was used for sodium and potassium estimation.

Table I. Diet formulation n for experimental treatments.

Ingredient

%

Fish meal

20

Soybean meal

25

Sunflower meal

20

Rice polish

15

Wheat flour

10

Fish oil

7

Minerals mixture*

2

Vitamin mixture**

1

*Each kg of mineral mixture contains; Ca (Calcium) 155 gm; P (Phosphorus) 135gm; Mg (Magnesium) 55mg; Na (Sodium) 45gm; Zn (Zinc) 3000 mg; Mn (Manganese) 2000 mg; Fe (Iron) 1000 mg; Cu (Copper) 600 mg; Co (Cobalt) 40 mg; I (Iodine) 40mg; K (Potassium) 2000 mg. **Each g of vitamin mixture contains; Vitamin A (Retinoic acid) 5.0mg; Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) 0.5mg; Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) 3.0mg; Vitamin B3 (Niacin) 5.0mg; Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine) 1.0mg; Vitamin B7 (Biotin) 0.05mg; Vitamin B9 (Folic acid) 0.18mg; Vitamin B12 (Cobalamine) 0.002mg; Vitamin C (Ascorbic acid) 5.0mg; Vitamin. E (Vitamin E) 6.0mg; Cellulose 874.26mg; Choline 100mg.

For digestive enzymes assays, eight fishes were randomly collected, anaesthetized and dissected from each replicate for the collection of intestines. The tissue homogenizer (Wisd HG-15D, DAIHAN Scientific) was used for homogenization of sample in cold sucrose (0.25 M) solution. The homogenate were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 15 min in a cooling centrifuge (5ºC), supernatant was collected, frozen in sample vials, and stored at -20ºC until use. The dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) methods were used for the estimation of amylase activity . In reaction mixture starch (0.5Ml) and enzyme extract (0.5mL) were incubated at 37ºC for half an hour. For stopping reaction dinitrosalicylic acid was added and placed in boiling water for five minutes. After cooling, distilled water was added for dilution and absorbance were taken at 540nm. Activity were observed by maltose standard curve. Kunitz (1947) describes the casein digestion method for analyzing the protease activity.

Table II. Minerals content (µg/g) in the bones of C. idella.

Diet

FA (%)

VD3 (IU/ kg)

Phos-phorus

Calcium

Mag-nesium

Sodium

Potassium

Zinc

Copper

Iron

Menganese

FD1

0

0

12.51± 0.03d

15.29± 0.01d

0.34± 0.02d

1.76± 0.02d

0.19±0.02d

113.90± 0.07d

13.76± 0.02d

36.83± 0.02d

30.59±0.02d

FD2

2

0

12.77± 0.03c

15.35± 0.03c

0.39± 0.02c

1.86± 0.04c

0.28±0.01c

114.08± 0.04a

14.14± 0.04a

37.04± 0.02c

30.74±0.02c

FD3

0

500

13.09± 0.04b

15.73 ±0.03b

0.44± 0.02b

2.07± 0.02b

0.36±0.01b

113.91± 0.04c

14.2± 0.04c

37.2± 0.02b

30.98±0.02b

FD4

500

2

13.13± 0.04a

15.76± 0.03a

0.49± 0.03a

2.11± 0.03a

0.47±0.02a

113.97± 0.03b

14.3± 0.04b

37.3± 0.03a

31.14±0.02a

Values sharing similar letters in a column are non-significant at P<0.05. FA, Formic acid; VD3,Vitamin D3

In reaction mixture casein as substrate (1%), phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) and tissue homogenate were added and kept at 37ºC for fifteen minutes. Reaction was stopped after addition of trichloroacetic acid (5%). The reaction mixture was filtered and obsorbance taken at 280nm. The activity of lipase was analysed by using p-nitrophenylpalmitate as the substrate . In reaction mixture p-nitrophenylpalmitate solution (0.9 mL), phosphate buffer (0.5 M) and enzyme extract were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. p-nitrophenol values were calculated at 410 nm expressed as μmol/min (one unit of activity).

Two-way analysis of variance under RCBD was applied for data analysis . For comparison of means Student-Newman-Keuls test was used for determining significant differences . For analyzing statistical data CoStat computer package (Version 6.303, PMB320 Monterey, CA, 93940 USA) was used.

Results

The fish group fed with formic acid significant showed increase in calcium, magnesium and potassium; however vitamin D3 significantly increased the iron and manganese contents (µg/g) in the bones of C. idella fingerlings (Table II). Table III shows the intestinal digestive enzyme activities of C. idella fingerlings. The amylase and protease activities were maximum in intestine of fish fed with formic acid followed by fornic acid: vitamin D3 (500:2), vitamin D3 (control diet). The activity of lipase enzyme was reduced by supplementation of formic acid as well as vitamin D3. The observed formic acid and vitamin D3 (interactions) were synergistically enhanced bone mineralization of phosphorous (13.13±0.04a), sodium (2.11±0.03a), copper (14.3±0.04) and also showed enhanced results for the activity of amylase (2.75±0.00), protease(0.95±0.01) and lipase (0.30±0.01).

Discussion

In the present research work, the supplementation of formic acid exhibited noteworthy effect on calcium, potassium and manganese absorption during the development of bones of C. idella. The phytate hydrolysis alters the physiological condition which enhances the utilization of minerals . Similar results were reported by Khajepour and Hosseini (2010) who described that phosphorous and calcium content were enhanced in muscle tissue by the supplementation of 2% and 3% citric acid in the diet of beluga. In our research work the vitamin D3 supplementation significantly affected the iron and manganese in bones of C. idella. Likewise, Zhu et al. (2015) stated that addition of vitamin D3 in fish diet considerably enhanced the retention of sodium, potassium, phosphorous, calcium, magnesium and zinc in whole body of yellow catfish. Connell and Gatlin (1994) described that blue tilapia fed with dietary vitamin D3 considerably condensed the mineralization in hard tissues as compared to soft tissue, because dietary vitamin D had partial participation in calcium metabolism and mineralization of the hard tissues of tilapia.

Table III. Digestive enzymes activities (units/mg protein) in the intestine of C. idella.

Diet

FA (%)

VD3 (IU/kg)

Amylase

Protease

Lipase

FD1

0

0

2.65±0.01c

0.92±0.01c

0.34±0.01a

FD2

2

0

2.84±0.01a

1.01±0.01a

0.32±0.01b

FD3

0

500

2.65±0.01c

0.95±0.01b

0.30±0.01c

FD4

500

2

2.75±0.00b

0.95±0.01b

0.30±0.01c

Values sharing similar letters in a column are non-significant at P<0.05. FA, Formic acid; VD3,Vitamin D3.

In the current research work, it was concluded that the activity of amylase, lipase and protease considerably improved in the intestine of C. idella fed with formic acid supplemented diets. The activity of enzymes was perhaps due to release of trace element by supplementation of organic acid in fish diet . The results are in line with those of Shah et al. (2015) who stated that supplementation of 3% citric acid in the diet of Labeo rohita fingerlings improved the activities of protease, lipase and amylase. Likewise, the tilapia fed with 1% citric acid supplemented diet improved the activity of amylase. When citric acid was added in diet, metal ion present in diet increases the activity of amylase in intestine of tilapia . Furthermore, according to Agouz et al. (2015) supplementation of organic salts (malic+oxalic acids blend and Na-acetate+Ca-lactate blend) in the diet of Nile tilapia considerably increased the activity of protease enzyme.

The conclusion is dietary formic acid and vitamin D3 improves the bone mineralization and digestive enzymes activity in the C. idella juveniles.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agouz, H.M., Soltan, M.A. and Meshrf, R.N., 2015. Egyptian J. Nut. Feeds, 18: 443-450.
  2. Anthony, W.H., 1979. Vitamin D. The calcium home-static steriod hormone. Academic Press, New York.
  3. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), 1995. Official methods of analysis. (16th Ed.). AOAC, Inc., Arlington, Virginia, USA.
  4. Baruah, K., Norouzitallab, P., Debnath, D., Pal, A.K. and Sahu, N.P., 2008. Aquacul. Hlth. Int., March 2008. pp. 4-6.
  5. Browdy L., Ei, O., Minh, P. and Bharadwaj, S., 2011. Abstract CD-ROM. World Aquaculture Society, Natal, Brazil.
  6. Correll, D.L., 1999. Poult. Sci., 78: 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.5.674[CrossRef]
  7. Connel, P.O. and Gatlin, 1994. Aquaculture, 125: 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)90287-9[CrossRef]
  8. Dalsgaard, J., Ekman, K.S., Pedersen, P.B. and Verlhac, V., 2009. Aquaculture, 286: 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.09.007[CrossRef]
  9. Hossain, M.A., Pandey, A. and Satoh, S., 2007. Fish Sci., 73: 1309-1317.
  10. Khajepour, F., and A.Hosseini, S., 2010. World appl. Sci. J., 11: 682-686.
  11. Kunitz, M., 1947. J. Gen. Physiol., 30: 311-320.
  12. Laining, A., Traifalgar, R.F., Thu, M., Komilus, C.F., Kader, M.A., Koshio, S., Ishikawa, M. and Yokoyama, S., 2010. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 41: 746-755. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2010.00416.x[CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.S., Li, J.L. and Wu, T.T., 2009. Aquacult. Nutr. 15: 415-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2008.00606.x[CrossRef]
  14. Li, A.J., 1994. Aquaculture nutrition and feed. China Agricuture Press, Beijing.
  15. Luckstadt, C., 2006. Int. Aquafeed, 9: 21-26.
  16. Lunger, A.N., McLean, E., and Craig, S.R., 2007. Aquaculture, 264: 342-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.12.012[CrossRef]
  17. Mahadik, N.D., Puntambekar, U.S., Bastawde, K.B., Khire, J.M. and Gokhale, D.V., 2002. Process Biochem., 38: 715-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00194-2[CrossRef]
  18. Rick, W. and Stegbauer, H.P., 1974. Meth. Enzym. Anal., 885–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-091302-2.50074-8[CrossRef]
  19. Shah, S.Z.H., Afzal, M., Hussain, S.M., Fatima, M., Muhammad, B., Ahmed, T. and Habib, R.Z., 2015. Biologia (Pakistan), 61: 63-68.
  20. Shaikh, H.M., and Kamble, S.M., 2011. J. Fish. Aquacult., 2: 08-10.
  21. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. and Dickey, D.A., 1996. Principles and procedures of statistics, 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill International Book Co. Inc., New York. USA. pp. 336-352.
  22. Sugiura, S.H., Roy, P.K. and Ferraris, R.P., 2006. J. exp. Biol., 209: 3719-3728. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02436[CrossRef]
  23. Snedecor, G.W. and Conhran, W.G., 1991. Statistical methods. 8th Ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, USA, pp. 503.
  24. Toko, I., Fiogbe, D.E. and Kestemont, P., 2008. Aquaculture, 275: 298-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.11.038[CrossRef]
  25. Vielma, J. and Lall, S.P., 1997. Aquacult. Nutr., 3: 265-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.1997.00041.x[CrossRef]
  26. Wood, R.J. and Serfaty-Lacrosniere, C., 1992. Nutr. Rev., 50: 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1992.tb02510.x[CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, Q.C., Tan, B.P., Mai, K.S., and Liu, Y.J., 2004. Aquaculture, 241: 441-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.08.044[CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, Y., Ding, Q., Chan, J., Chen, P. and Wang, C., 2015. Aquaculture, 436: 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.11.006[CrossRef]
  29. Zyla, K., Ledoux, D.R., Garcia, A., and Veum, T.L., 1995. Br. J. Nutr., 74: 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19950102[CrossRef]

Services

Article usage statistics

Loading…