Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Outbreaks of PPR-FMD among Sheep and Goats in Hail, Saudi Arabia

VSRR_3_2_38-44

 

 

 

Outbreaks of PPR-FMD among Sheep and Goats in Hail, Saudi Arabia

Ahmed Zein Elabdeen Mahmoud1, Muaz Magzob Abdellatif2* and Mohamed Abdelsalam Abdalla3

1Veterinary Laboratories, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Biology (Microbiology), Faculty of Arts and Science, Northern Borders University, Saudi Arabia; 3Sudan University of Sciences and Technology, Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Sudan.

Abstract | Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is a viral disease which primarily affects small ruminants, causing significant economic losses for the livestock industry. Clinical investigation was carried out during the suspected outbreaks of PPR/FMD in sheep and goats in Hail. Saudi Arabia. During the outbreaks 271 (20.6%) died out of 648 (49.3%) of affected animals, the overall morbidity in goats (33.3%) was higher as compared to sheep (12.3%), with a case fatality rate in goats reached 74.69% in the 2nd outbreak. Affected animals exhibited fever, stomatitis, mucopurulent to bloody nasal/ocular discharges, watery to bloody diarrhea and lameness. The major gross lesions were erosive stomatitis, hemorrhages in lung, liver, abomasum, small and large intestine. PPRV NP was detected in sheep (n=20) and goats (n=18), anti-PPRV NP was also detected among sheep and goats (n=162) by ELISA, 3ABC-FMD enzyme immunoassay were positive (n=6) when ovine sera were tested. The study revealed that PPR-FMD viruses were circulating in the region and warrants proper control measures.


Editor | Muhammad Abubakar, National Veterinary Laboratories, Park Road, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Received | April 17, 2017; Accepted | June 19, 2017; Published | June 25, 2017

*Correspondence | Muaz Magzob Abdellatif, Department of Biology (Microbiology), Faculty of Arts and Science, Northern Borders University, Saudi Arabia; Email: muazm20@gmail.com

Citation | Mahmoud, A.Z.E., M.M. Abdellatif and M.A. Abdalla. 2017. Outbreaks of PPR-FMD among sheep and goats in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Veterinary Sciences: Research and Reviews, 3(2): 38-44.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.vsrr/2017/3.2.38.44

Key words: Outbreaks, PPR, FMD, ELISA, Hail, Saudi Arabia



Introduction

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is a highly contagious often fatal viral disease of domestic and wild ruminants caused by PPR virus (PPRV) of the family Paramyxoviridae (Venkataramanan et al., 2005; Diallo et al., 2007; Banyard et al., 2010). PPR is transmitted by direct contact with infectious animals shedding the virus in both ocular-nasal discharges and in fecal matter (Munir et al., 2013). Fomite contamination with the virus from infected animals such as feed troughs and bedding is an additional source of infection (Lefèvre et al., 1990). The disease is characterized by pyrexia, purulent mucous nasal/ocular discharges, necrotizing and erosive stomatitis, gastroenteritis, diarrhea and bronchopneumonia (Balamurugan et al., 2014). Geographically, PPR has been reported in the Middle East, South Asia, China and sub-Saharan Africa (Shaila et al., 1996), serological evidence has been documented in Uganda, Sudan, Tanzania and Ethiopia (Waret-Szkuta et al., 2008; Luka et al., 2011). In Saudi Arabia, it was first reported in 1990 (Abu Elzein et al., 1990), the disease has since spread to different parts of the country (Housawi et al., 2004; Al-Afaleq et al., 2004; Boshra et al., 2015; Mahmoud et al., 2016, 2017).

Foot and mouth disease (FMD) is one of the most serious transboundary animal diseases. It is a highly contagious viral disease, and may have rapid and unanticipated national and international spread and is characterized by fever and vesicular eruption in the mouth and on the feet and teats (Radostits et al., 2000; Alexandersen, 2005; Wernery and Kinne, 2012). The virus was classified under the genus aphthovirus of the family Picornaviridae (Radostits et al., 2000). Mild or unapparent infections in sheep and goats may hinder control programs (Kitching and Hughes, 2002). Outbreaks of FMD was repeatedly documented among sheep and goats in various regions of Saudi Arabia (Hafez et al., 1993a; Hafez et al., 1993b; Hamada et al., 2008; Alsayeqh and Fathi, 2012).

The current investigation was aimed at describing the pathology and epidemiology of PPR-FMD infections in four mixed flocks (sheep, goats and camels) in Hail district. Saudi Arabia.

Materials and Methods

Epidemiological investigation

Outbreaks occurred among four mixed farms (sheep, goats and camels) in Hail district. Saudi Arabia were investigated during February to May 2016 (Table 1).

Sample collection

Nasopharyngeal, ocular and rectal swabs (n=46) were collected from affected goats (n=18), sheep (n=20) and clinically healthy camels (n=8). Sera were collected from goats (n=38), sheep (n=124) and camels (n=8), samples were preserved at 4ºC until tested.

P.M Examination

Autopsy were performed on recently dead sheep (n=26) and goats (n=20), gross pathology was recorded.

PPR-NP ELISA

Immune capture ELISA kits for detection of PPR-NP antigen was used (ID Screen®PPR Antigen Capture- CIRAD, Montpellier, France) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The absorbance was read at 450nm with an ELISA reader (BioTek ELX800). The results were calculated as sample positivity (S/P%) and the level of PPRV was expressed as percentage of the positive control. If S/P ˃20% it was considered negative, S/P ≥20% it was considered positive.

Anti-NP ELISA

The NP-epitopes based competitive ELISA kits (ID screen®PPR competition, ID vet, Grabels, FRANCE) was used for screening of anti-PPRV nucleoprotein antibodies in serum according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The absorbance was read at 450nm with an ELISA reader (BioTek ELX800). Samples were presented as S/N%, S/N ≤ 50% - positive, >50 - ≥60%- doubtful and >60% were considered negative.

Table 1: Epidemiological data of outbreaks in Hail, Saudi Arabia

Outbreak

(Date)

Species Vaccination No. affected (%) No. dead (%) Case fatality rate (%) Total
1st Outbreak

(February 2016)

Goats X 130 (65) 57 (29) 43.8 200
Sheep X 150 (50) 37 (12) 24.7 300
Camels X 0 0 0 0
Total   280 94 33.6 500
2nd Outbreak

(April 2016)

Goats X

83 (63.8)

62 (47.7) 74.69 130
Sheep 0 0 0 70
Camels X 0 0 0 9
Total   83 62 24.53 209
3rd Outbreak

(April 2016)

Goats X 35 (70) 7 (14) 20 50
Sheep X 150 (50) 47 (16) 31.3 300
Camels X 0 0 0 4
Total   185 54 29.19 354
4th Outbreak

(May 2016)

Goats X 0 0 0 0
Sheep X 100 (40) 61 (24.4) 61 250
Camels X 0 0 0 0
Total   100 61 61

250

 

Table 2: Morbidity& mortality rates according to age

  Age group No. affected (%) No. dead (%) Case fatality rate (%) Total

1st Outbreak

Young 150 (73.5) 54 (26.5) 36 204
Adult 130 (76.5) 40 (23.5) 30.8 170
Total 280 (74.9) 94 (25.1) 33.8 374

2nd Outbreak

Young 44 (52.4) 40 (47.6) 90.9 84
Adult 39 (63.9) 22 (36.1) 56.4 61
Total 83 (57.2) 62 (42.8) 74.7 145

3rd Outbreak

Young 75 (80.6) 18 (19.4) 24 93
Adult 110 (75.3) 36 (24.7) 32.7 146
Total 185 (77.4) 54 (22.6) 29.2 239

4th Outbreak

Young 100 (62.1) 61 (37.9) 61 161
Adult 0 0 0 0
Total 100 (62.1) 61 (37.9) 61

161

 

Table 3: Morbidity& mortality rates according to sex

    Male Female  
No. affected (%) No. dead (%) No. affected (%) No. dead (%) Total

1st Outbreak

Goats 37 (19.8) 13 (6.9) 93 (49.7) 44 (23.5) 187
Sheep 23 (12.3) 7 (3.7)

127 (67.9)

30 (16) 187
Camels 0 0 0 0 0
Total 60 (16) 20 (5.3) 220 (58.8) 74 (19.9) 374

2nd Outbreak

Goats 35 (24.1) 24 (16.6) 48 (33.1) 38 (26.2) 145
Sheep 0 0 0 0 0
Camels 0 0 0 0 0
Total 35 (24.1) 24 (16.6) 48 (33.1) 38 (26.2) 145

3rd Outbreak

Goats 3 (7.1) 0 32 (76.2) 7 (16.7) 42
Sheep 23 (11.7) 4 (2) 127 (64.5) 43 (21.8) 197
Camels 0 0 0 0 0
Total 26 (10.9) 4 (1.7) 159 (66.5) 50 (20.9) 239

4th Outbreak

Goats 0 0 0 0 0
Sheep 100 (62.1) 61 (37.9) 0 0 161
Camels 0 0 0 0 0
Total 100 (62.1) 61 (37.9) 0 0

161

 

3ABC-FMD ELISA

Enzyme immunoassay kits (IDEXX FMD 3ABC Ab test. IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.Westbrook, Maine 04092.USA) was used for detection of nonstructural polyprotein (NSP) 3ABC of FMD antigen, it was performed in accordance to the manufacturers’ instructions. Samples with percentage values >30% - positive, >20% -negative and samples between 20 and 30% were considered suspicious.

Results

Epidemiological investigation

During the four outbreaks 271 (20.6%) died out of 648 (49.3%) of affected animals, with a case fatality reached 41.8%, no record of vaccination, the overall morbidity in goats (33.3%) was higher as compared to sheep (12.3%) (Figure 1 and Table 1). The disease affected all age groups (Table 2), morbidity and mortality rates were high among female animals (Table 3).

Clinical signs

Affected animals exhibited fever (up to 41˚C), loss of appetite, stomatitis, hyper salivation, respiratory distress, mucopurulent to bloody nasal/ocular discharges, watery to bloody diarrheaand lameness (Figure 2).

Necropsy findings

Dissection of animals revealed erosions on the soft and hard palates, hemorrhages in lung (evidence of pneumonia), iver, abomasum, small and large intestine (Figure 3).

Sandwich ELISA

The presence of PPRV-antigen was detected in 38 swabs (82.6%) from sheep (n=20) and goats (n=18). Camel swabs were non-reactive.

c-ELISA

Screened sheep and goat sera were positive, camels were seronegative for anti-PPRV nucleoprotein antibodies.

FMD ELISA

Six ovine sera (30%) were positive for anti-NP antibodies while goats were negative.

Discussion

PPRV is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases among sheep and goats and is considered an emerging economically important disease in Saudi Arabia (Abu-Elzein et al., 1990; Al-Dubaib., 2009; Banyard et al., 2010; Mahmoud et al., 2016, 2017). In the present study, outbreaks occurred in four mixed farms were investigated, PPRV-NP, anti-PPRV-NP were detected from sheep and goats and FMD-NSP were positive from sheep sera. During the outbreaks 271 (20.6%) died out of 648 (49.3%), the overall morbidity in goats (33.3%) was higher as compared to sheep (12.3%), a case fatality rate was high in goats (74.69%), other authors found a mortality of 23 – 100% (Abu Elzein et al., 1990; Taylor et al., 1990; Chowdhury et al., 2014). Mahmoud and Galbat (2017) reported high susceptibility of sheep flocks to the infection with FMD and PPR viruses, with positivity rates of 76% for FMD and 64% for PPR antigen, the susceptibility of sheep and goats can vary with the breed of animal and strain of virus (Kitching and Hughes, 2002). Previous studies indicated that more severe disease results from mixed infection of bacteria and viruses (Osman et al., 2009). We did not take any attempt to isolate bacteria from these cases.

Young animals (6–12 months) were more susceptible than the aged, which are inconsistent with the findings of Taylor et al. (1990). This may be due to maternally derived PPR antibody that persists up to 4 months (Libeau et al., 1992). It is likely that antibody derived from sub-clinical infection in aged goats protected themselves as well as their young progenies. This observation was in accordance with reports of Taylor et al. (1979).

Foot and mouth disease (FMD) is considered one of the enzootic diseases in Saudi Arabia (Al-Mezaini et al., 1985; Aidros, 2002; Yousef et al., 2012). Sheep infections are frequently mild or in apparent (Geering, 1967; Donaldson and Sellers, 2000), often been implicated as disseminators of the virus (Krystynak, 1987; Barnett and Cox, 1999). Saudi Arabia imports annually millions of live ruminants for slaughter. The majority of these animals are imported from countries where FMD is enzootic, importing either carrier animals which might act as potential source of infection or subclinical infected animals which might actively excrete FMD virus (Hafez et al. 1994).

The present investigation detected mixed PPR-FMD infections among small ruminants in Hail. Saudi Arabia, large-scale sero-prevalence and molecular identification of the circulating strains will help in implementing proper control measures.

Authors’ Contribution

Mahmoud, A.Z., M. Abdellatif investigate the clinical picture of the outbreaks, test samples and wrote the manuscript. M. Abdalla supervised the study and revised the manuscript, all read and approved it for submission.

References

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Veterinary Sciences: Research and Reviews

June

Vol. 9, Iss. 1, Pages 1-86

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe